Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


AQ wants to outdo 9/11 in new attack on US

posted at 8:25 am on November 10, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | regular view

An Arab newspaper in London has reported that al-Qaeda intends on launching an attack on the US that would “outdo by far” the 9/11 attacks.  Al-Quds al-Arabi also reported that their Yemeni contact within AQ, a “former senior operative”, says the terrorist network has already begun consolidating its networks in preparation for the attack:

OSAMA bin Laden is planning an attack against the United States that will “outdo by far” September 11, an Arab newspaper in London has reported.

And according to a former senior Yemeni al-Qaeda operative, the terrorist organisation has entered a “positive phase”, reinforcing specific training camps around the world that will lead the next “wave of action” against the West.

The warning, on the front page of an Arabic newspaper published in London, Al-Quds Al-Arabi – and widely reported in the major Italian papers – quotes a person described as being “very close to al-Qaeda” in Yemen.

The paper is edited by Abdel al-Bari Atwan, who is said to be the last journalist to interview Osama bin Laden in 1996. According to the report, bin Laden is himself closely following preparations for an attack against the US and aims to “change the face of world politics and economics”. The operative is quoted as saying that “this will be shown by the fact that we now control a major part of the south of Somalia”.

The Australian newspaper The Age accepts this at face value, despite the hardships AQ has faced over the last few years.  They have had difficulty recruiting ever since the collapse of their effort in Iraq, and the financing for their network has become far more problematic since 9/11.  The claim to control significant territory in Somalia sounds like a gross exaggeration, but even if they did, Somalia hardly gives them funding or strategic positioning.  Most damning is the lack of any real action from AQ over the last two years as they watched their organization get destroyed in Iraq.

That doesn’t make them dead, though, and they may still have enough resources to at least attempt a major action against the US.  It only took 19 men to make the 9/11 attacks succeed, after all.  We’re now much more vigilant about security and counterterrorism than we were before the attacks, but they’ve also had time to adapt.

What targets would “change the face of world politics and economics”?  That sounds like a renewed focus on either New York City or Washington DC, or perhaps both.  They could be looking at Wall Street, the UN, or perhaps a strike at Capitol Hill.

Still, this sounds more like empty bravado than an imminent threat.  Osama wants to make himself relevant after hitching his wagon to the war in Iraq and losing badly.  Talking up his plans for world domination may win him a few more recruits, but he’s too busy hiding from Predators to do much else.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Sure, or Mexico. The point is that it ain’t inconspicuous.

LimeyGeek on November 10, 2008 at 9:59 AM

They just scuttle the ship and commit suicide. That doesn’t seem out of character.

DarkCurrent on November 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM

During the primaries, Obama, Clinton, Richardson and Edwards were debating in New Hampshire and Charlie Gibson asked them what they would do if a U.S. city was nuked.

Everyone one of them pretty much should have disqualified themselves for presidency with their answers, especially Edwards. I can’t find the transcript of the clip, but at the time thought that should have been used as a GOP attack ad during the presidential race.

CanadianGuy on November 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM

Before or after the cake cutting? – High

After, using the same knife :-)

Tony737 on November 10, 2008 at 9:50 AM

Haha, I’m reminded of the 2nd Battle of Fallujah. When the Marines took the city, it happened over the course of the USMC Birthday. One anecdote was that Marines were in a multi-story building and using it as a strongpoint in a street battle. During the fight, they would take turns and head downstairs so they could have cake and sing Happy Birthday Marine Corps!

:D

Kai on November 10, 2008 at 10:03 AM

Sure, or Mexico. The point is that it ain’t inconspicuous.

LimeyGeek on November 10, 2008 at 9:59 AM

But to whom would it be inconspicuous? Maybe the folks at Cheyenne mountain and other nations, but you would be screwed. There is so much that is controlled by computer that it would disrupt civilization. You do realize that even the civilian power grid would be susceptible to this, since it is all computer controlled.

Marine_Bio on November 10, 2008 at 10:05 AM

I thought Barry was going to buy the world a some coke and we would all sing on a hillside together?

Where do you think he would get all that money to buy all that coke?

rightside on November 10, 2008 at 10:05 AM

They just scuttle the ship and commit suicide. That doesn’t seem out of character.

DarkCurrent on November 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM

Whatever they do, their mission will have a giant neon sign. Forensics will retrace their mission, and very bad things will happen to all accomplices.

LimeyGeek on November 10, 2008 at 10:08 AM

Marine_Bio on November 10, 2008 at 10:05 AM

I am intimately knowledgeable about such things. At no point did I suggest that it wouldn’t be a big deal, only that it is something you cannot do stealthily. It’s too big to hide.

LimeyGeek on November 10, 2008 at 10:10 AM

Whatever they do, their mission will have a giant neon sign. Forensics will retrace their mission, and very bad things will happen to all accomplices.

LimeyGeek on November 10, 2008 at 10:08 AM

Likely true, but would they care? What if their primary support came from Iran and the intent was to bring forth the 12th Imam? I’m not saying it’s likely to happen, but still a serious threat that has to be considered seriously, and no doubt is being considered seriously, at least until Jan 20.

DarkCurrent on November 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM

Obama will apologize

Bevan on November 10, 2008 at 10:18 AM

DarkCurrent on November 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM

Hey, I’m not debating their incentives, or likely supporters, or probability, or seriousness…..only that it is an act that cannot be hidden.

If they do such a thing, we will put the pieces together, identify the guilty, and decide their fate. In the case of such a nuclear attack, I doubt there will be much scope for debating ‘proportionality’.

LimeyGeek on November 10, 2008 at 10:18 AM

During the fight, they would take turns and head downstairs so they could have cake and sing Happy Birthday Marine Corps! – Kai

That’s what’s so cool about the Marines, they’re so into their history. I was in the Air Force and couldn’t tell you when our birthday is, but I know the Corps’ b-day.

Semper fi all HotAir Marines!

Tony737 on November 10, 2008 at 10:19 AM

This is a job for community organizers!

irishspy on November 10, 2008 at 10:19 AM

If they do such a thing, we will put the pieces together, identify the guilty, and decide their fate. In the case of such a nuclear attack, I doubt there will be much scope for debating ‘proportionality’.

LimeyGeek on November 10, 2008 at 10:18 AM

Agreed

DarkCurrent on November 10, 2008 at 10:21 AM

LimeyGeek on November 10, 2008 at 10:10 AM

No, I didn’t get the impression that you were thinking it wouldn’t be a huge deal. The point that I’m trying to make is that this is no small thing, and the folks who would be willing to do something in response will not be able to. If you affect peoples’ access to their money, things go very bad very quickly…and that will be where the energies are devoted instead of kicking someone’s tail.

Then there is the will of those in power to do something about it. Obama isn’t the same caliber of person as say Harry Truman, and I do believe I would have a minor coronary if he started to show some spine.

That was the most frightening component of Biden’s moment of lucidity when he warned of the testing that would occur. He warned that there would be unrest and people rising up against Obama and it wouldn’t immediately be apparent that he was right, so he was asking the group to be ready to support Obama with their influence, not their money. This is what they called a “Rhetorical Fluorish”? Astounding that the people of America are that mind numbed.

Marine_Bio on November 10, 2008 at 10:24 AM

Bin Laden is deathly afraid. Now that there isn’t a neocon in office and there’s going to be a gradual pull back of American imperialism abroad he is going to lose thousands and thousands of potential recruits. Bin Laden desperately needs the war on terror to continue as is if he’s going to bring about amargeddon, which is his goal. I hope our intelligence community can stop this before another Alqaeda attacks leads to a further escalation in violence. I’m a little squicked out by people on this board who seem to be wishing for such an attack because:
1. It will validate their negative opinion of Obama
2. They really enjoy perpetual war.

DeathToMediaHacks on November 10, 2008 at 10:26 AM

Marine_Bio on November 10, 2008 at 10:05 AM
I am intimately knowledgeable about such things. At no point did I suggest that it wouldn’t be a big deal, only that it is something you cannot do stealthily. It’s too big to hide.

LimeyGeek on November 10, 2008 at 10:10 AM

Wrong. Getting fissile material into the US has been done in the past by our own agencies testing the system. They did it by hiding it in large shipments of granite shipped from over seas. Also the southern border is so porus anyone can bring anything through it with out notice. If they broke it down in small shipments it would be undetectable. If they had people in place, which they do, then reassembling a TNW here in the states would be the easy part.

0321_GUY on November 10, 2008 at 10:27 AM

All this talk about nukes, bioweapons and other WMDs misses the point of terrorism. Terrorism has as its sole objective to cause terror..what would be more terrifying to the general popultaion then a series of violent attacks across the nation at the height of the holiday season. I don’t remember the name of the movie off the top of my head but there was a Chuck Norris movie about a group of Russian terrorist committing a series of terrorist attacks across the southern portion of the US, Tom Clancy also used this concept as a baseline for one of his books. And this would not require any major attack planning. Simply sneak terrorist cells into the country through our porous borders and bingo. Look at the panic the DC Sniper case caused and that was localized..imagine the panic if shopping malls around the country were attacked over a random period of a month or so. The actual death toll may not even equal the level of 9/11 but the terror value would be tenfold.
Now this is easily doable by even a very weakened AQ..for the most part if requires manpower not major cash or high end weaponry

Kidd on November 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM

I studied the Katrina aftermath carefully. What interested me most were the enclaves of rich folks who refused to leave their homes and businesses in the lawless aftermath. These people had generators, secured their possessions from looters and when Mayor Nagin tried to evacuate the city, they refused to go. Since the police had a lot more on their mind than engaging in a gun and lawyer battle with these people, they abandoned the attempt.

This is the model we have to use in the coming days. Whether this is an Al-Queda attack or merely lawless looting in the aftermath of blackouts when Obama’s energy policies kick in, we need to have a plan for our families to survive and keep our hard-earned possessions and businesses.

My community can be easily gated with two trucks and a couple of tough guys with shotguns. There are people who did this during Katrina, and they succeeded brilliantly. We can do it too.

bonnie_ on November 10, 2008 at 10:29 AM

I’ll chime back in only because it doesn’t look like anyone’s brought up Barry’s preacher yet; the one ranting from the pulpit about “America’s chickens coming home to roost.”

saint kansas on November 10, 2008 at 10:30 AM

Maybe President Elect Dipstick should buy Osama a puppy. You know — one of those shelter mutts that the President Elect identifies with.

My collie says:

Please leave us dogs out of it. Besides, if Osama launches a major attack (like a nuclear strike), President Elect Shelter Mutt has the perfect plan to nullify the impact of such an attack. That’s right. He’ll just ignore it and pretend that it didn’t happen.

CyberCipher on November 10, 2008 at 10:32 AM

0321_GUY on November 10, 2008 at 10:27 AM

This is not what I am referring to. You’re talking at cross-purposes.

LimeyGeek on November 10, 2008 at 10:33 AM

In the context of the threat, this is even more puzzling, and actually more frightening.

Marine_Bio on November 10, 2008 at 10:48 AM

This is a job for community organizers!

irishspy on November 10, 2008 at 10:19 AM

Uh… Osama is an Islamic Community Organizer…

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 10, 2008 at 10:48 AM

The irony is that, whatever form the attack may take, it will almost certainly be made against a solid-Blue urban area. And, God forgive me, I will have much less empathy for the victims than I did with respect to 9/11.

I wonder just what it will take before the Hope & Change (TM) people realize that radical Islam hates their values as much as it hates Israel?

Venusian Visitor on November 10, 2008 at 10:51 AM

I wonder just what it will take before the Hope & Change (TM) people realize that radical Islam hates their values as much as it hates Israel?

Well more or less a nanosecond will change everything and all their(those who voted for our dear leader) hope will be up in dust.

0321_GUY on November 10, 2008 at 11:01 AM

I’m sorry, but the word “Waziristan” makes me laugh.

PattyJ on November 10, 2008 at 11:08 AM

Off topic a little- Obama has sent an advisor to engage in talks with Syria and Egypt, telling them he will give their view more consideration in future. The man he chose to send is Robet Malley- who Obama allegedly sacked during the campaign when it emerged he was in regular contact with Hamas. At the time Obama’s spokesman said that “he will not play any role in the future”.

Jay Mac on November 10, 2008 at 11:21 AM

There are literally hundreds of ways that Al Qaeda or any other terrorist group could wreak havoc in the United States. One reason they haven’t done anything since 9-11 is because they know George Bush will destroy any nation he finds is in cahoots with them. Bin Laden, or whoever is pulling his strings, knows that a President Obama is not going to commit the military to new conflicts so soon after taking office. It is not in his DNA to send the US military to the other side of the planet to kill other humans.

I fully expect some sort of terrorist attack in 2009. It may not be planes flying into buildings but don’t be surprised to see NY’s water supply effed with or a nuclear plant attacked. Biden was right — this guy is going to be tested early.

grdred944 on November 10, 2008 at 11:31 AM

I don’t think who our president is means much to Bin Ladin and his ilk. They are always planning attacks on us–and Bin Ladin has proved himself to be a good general. He is an engineer and parlayed the $13 million (I think) his dad left him into $200 million or more with good business / organization skills. He (and / or his advisors) scaled back the 9/11 attack from 10 planes to 4 planes to get a better operational plan–and showed how cheaply and simply he could damage us.
***
His next attack will probably be with small A-BOMBS–the lightweight types used on the Tactical Ballistic Missiles North Korea and Pakistan have now. Iran is probably designing / building similar warheads–only a big country like the U.S.A. can sustain an air force capable of carrying really big nukes.
***
The targets will be the same–NYC and Washington D.C. The bombs will be backpacked over the porous Northern or Southern borders. Coming soon to U.S. cities–when the patient Bin Ladin finally gets his bombs and plans together.

John Bibb

rocketman on November 10, 2008 at 11:34 AM

Obama will apologize

Bevan on November 10, 2008 at 10:18 AM

Osama will accept, and then hit us again…and again…and again…and again…good bye America.

labrat on November 10, 2008 at 11:44 AM

Happy 233rd.

unclesmrgol on November 10, 2008 at 12:00 PM

Semper Fi.

Venusian Visitor on November 10, 2008 at 12:10 PM

So far all from Osama has been talk, fortunately.

I just worry if some of the counter-measures that Bush has put up over the past seven years are removed, if we open ourselves. There’s a reason we’ve been safe so long and the President-Elect should not undermine it. Were any future attack do to his policies, we should not be afraid to mention it.

amazingmets on November 10, 2008 at 12:30 PM

1. It will validate their negative opinion of Obama
2. They really enjoy perpetual war.

DeathToMediaHacks on November 10, 2008 at 10:26 AM

How about 3. You can’t defeat an enemy without confrontation. Barry is expected to be an appeaser, and unless the issue is thrust in front of him, he can continue to vote “present.” We deserve answers, and we can’t tolerate weakness.

Greek Fire on November 10, 2008 at 12:40 PM

They could be looking at Wall Street, the UN, or perhaps a strike at Capitol Hill.

Why would they attack their home base on American soil?

BKennedy on November 10, 2008 at 1:31 PM

Makes no sense. With Hussein Obama in office they will get all their issues without lifting a finger. Israel will be thrown under the bus. Gitmo will be closed. US troops out of Iraq.

Why bother blowing up cities and pissing Americans off?

angryed on November 10, 2008 at 1:43 PM

Because militant Islam’s problem with the U.S. isn’t just Israel and our mideast involvement. They hate our values – or absence of – as depicted by Hollywood. They aren’t keen on lewdness and dissolution, and they despise atheists even more than they despise Christians who are, after all, “people of the book” who should be alklowed to maintain a limited religious freedom if they submit to Islamic rule.

Sooner or later the libs will figure that out. ‘Course, by then, Israel will be a smoking hole in the ground.

Venusian Visitor on November 10, 2008 at 2:12 PM

Because militant Islam’s problem with the U.S. isn’t just Israel and our mideast involvement. They hate our values – or absence of – as depicted by Hollywood

No they don’t. They want what everyone else wants…power. That means power to control all of the mid-east (no Israel to get in the way, no US in Iraq). And without Gitmo, they get back a lot of their soldiers. I highly doubt OBL gives a rat’s ass what Hollywood says or does.

angryed on November 10, 2008 at 2:53 PM

How about DC Jan 20 at noon? Please Mr. bin Laden. Seriously though, why would they attack us when our Dear Leader is a sympathizer?
bill30097 on November 10, 2008 at 8:45 AM

Obambi is not only a sympathizer he’s an anti-war pacifistic appeaser (read useful idiot) and they know he will be a weak president so what better time to strike us when they know Kumbaya-Obambi won’t do a damn thing!

I don’t think our enemies will hit Obambi, he’s too useful to them for now, but there is no doubt they are going to do something to the US to test Kumbaya-Obambi’s resolve.

Interesting times indeed….

Liberty or Death on November 10, 2008 at 3:14 PM

We’ll see. Looks like Obama will completely cave in and they’ll have the power. If they stop there, then your theory is correct.

But, if it were correct, how do you explain the disproportionate reaction to Zionist occupation of a small amount of marginal, non-oil producing land? If no religious zealotry were involved, it would seem a lot more sensible to expand in a direction that yeilded more profit for less effort.

Venusian Visitor on November 10, 2008 at 3:15 PM

Obama makes Al Qaida’s job much easier. He will simply give terrorists asylum in the US.

Guardian on November 10, 2008 at 3:59 PM

We’re in trouble

http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2008/11/al-qaeda-planning-huge-attack-for-obama.html

Used HotAir as a source

orfannkyl on November 10, 2008 at 4:49 PM

If there is anything to it, it will be “soft targets”.

ricelchew on November 10, 2008 at 5:40 PM

A plane hitting the UN building and collapsing it (when closed for the day, of course) might not be so bad if the plane were full of terrorists (maybe even with Ayers at the controls).

Big John on November 10, 2008 at 6:57 PM

Obama will meet Osama without preconditions

Jamson64 on November 10, 2008 at 7:13 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.