CUDA!!!!!!!!!!
the_nile on November 10, 2008 at 12:45 PM

See, I knew you could do it.

Dear I’m still in the_denile Knucklehead,
Your implication is that the right wing media are always right. What exactly separates you from the moonbats you despise? both sets run off talking points they read on the internet like a bad case of diarrhea.
If it hurts your brain too much to consider differing viewpoints save us all some time and just type Cuda! and let it go. I’ll get the picture believe me.

Bradky on November 9, 2008 at 5:06 PM

Try to read what i wrote and not the inside of your empty skull. When the media are so obviously deranged you have to defend the attacked, you saw how they attacked “Joe the plumber” when he was a threat to Obama.

Fool me once , shame on you . You will not fool me again.

Lawyers pretty much ended that.

Oh well.

like Reagan

the_nile on November 9, 2008 at 12:59 PM

Dear I’m still in the_denile Knucklehead,
Your implication is that the right wing media are always right. What exactly separates you from the moonbats you despise? both sets run off talking points they read on the internet like a bad case of diarrhea.
If it hurts your brain too much to consider differing viewpoints save us all some time and just type Cuda! and let it go. I’ll get the picture believe me.

Defending Sarah is about defending democracy.

No it is not. It is about defending your choice for the next election – nothing more nothing less.

It’s the political elite ( msm and the self selected party machines ) trying to get rid of one from the people.

Perhaps you missed the quote from George Will above:

But note the argument that the manipulation of Americans by “the mainstream media” explains the fact that the more Palin campaigned, the less Americans thought of her qualifications. This argument portrays Americans as a bovine herd — or as inert clay in the hands of wily media, which only Palin’s conservative celebrators can decipher and resist.

Objectivity is the cornerstone of critical thinking.

Bradky on November 9, 2008 at 8:55 AM

Dear Moonbat Bradky Trollinsky, even media does now admit they were biased , after they screwed the election.

I’m not an American , I’m not religious.

I live in Scandinavia ,when i see our mainly left wing media ( bush bashers ) and the American media in concert having a field day on every bizarre rumor about Palin , i know she’s right and the media dead wrong.
You can still read articles that says she thinks the world is 4000years old.

driver on November 8, 2008 at 6:14 PM

Indeed. If only diaperrash was here to say ‘McCain will win’ and post that stupid story about how he generated his screen name in every other thread, all would be well in GOP land.
Look, instead of you groupies and sockpuppets posting updates and emails from exile, why don’t you just tell him to slink back here and act like he didn’t make a complete fool of himself? Nobody actually cares that he’s gone. His constructive on topic input was minimal; the only thing worse than having him here, treating the comment section like Adultfriendfinder, is having people like you yearning for him to come back. He’s not missed. Let him come back, or shut up about it.

As to Sarah, give her a little time to practice with the ever unfriendly press, keep her away from people like John McCain, and she’ll be fine in a few years. She’s a natural at reaching out to the electorate; let her tighten up her intellectual muscles on policy, and she’ll be nigh unstoppable.

Okay you want my words; Palin was a dumb choice driven in part because McCain rightly worried the base wouldn’t support him. Palin is far out of her league and two months on the campaign trail doesn’t give her the right to be the 2012 nominee.
Finally, those who can’t be objective are just fanboys and girls whose opinion is suspect. Typing Cuda! or Sara 2012! does not make me believe the writer can be objective irt Palin.

Bradky on November 9, 2008 at 9:22 AM

Thank you, Bradky. Now I can see that all is not lost on you. And you are right alluding to the facts that Mrs. Palin has several challenges ahead of her to convince enough of the electorate that she is both capable and worthy of the Presidency. (By the way, Obama escaped objective critical examination.) I believe that Sarah Palin’s character and convictions count, and that she can and will do it.

Finally, those who can’t be objective are just fanboys and girls whose opinion is suspect. Typing Cuda! or Sara 2012! does not make me believe the writer can be objective irt Palin.

Bradky on November 9, 2008 at 9:22 AM

In other words, they don’t see reality the way you see reality; ergo, they’re not being objective. Hell, I wish a little more than 48% of the electorate had been more “objective”.

gracie on November 9, 2008 at 9:05 AM

Okay you want my words; Palin was a dumb choice driven in part because McCain rightly worried the base wouldn’t support him. Palin is far out of her league and two months on the campaign trail doesn’t give her the right to be the 2012 nominee.

Finally, those who can’t be objective are just fanboys and girls whose opinion is suspect. Typing Cuda! or Sara 2012! does not make me believe the writer can be objective irt Palin.

Would we have two minority Presidents back to back you think? I am just throwing out the question.

johnnyU on November 9, 2008 at 8:34 AM

Women are the majority. ;)

Objectivity is the cornerstone of critical thinking.

Bradky on November 9, 2008 at 8:55 AM

Its just too bad that George Will ddidn’t have the objectivity to see a candidate whose candidacy was based solely on skin pigmentation.

These conservatives, smitten by a vice presidential choice based on chromosomes, seem eager to compete on the Democrats’ terrain of identity politics, entering the “diversity” sweepstakes they have hitherto rightly deplored. We have seen this movie before. Immediately after the 1972 election, some conservatives laid down the law — the 1976 Republican nominee must be Vice President Spiro Agnew.This came from George Will’s latest article at
Bradky on November 9, 2008 at 8:45 AM

Bradky: You don’t need the Philosophical One George Will stretching for his nonsequiturs to justify your beliefs.
Speak for yourself so you’ll make sense.

Defending Sarah is about defending democracy.

No it is not. It is about defending your choice for the next election – nothing more nothing less.

It’s the political elite ( msm and the self selected party machines ) trying to get rid of one from the people.

Perhaps you missed the quote from George Will above:

But note the argument that the manipulation of Americans by “the mainstream media” explains the fact that the more Palin campaigned, the less Americans thought of her qualifications. This argument portrays Americans as a bovine herd — or as inert clay in the hands of wily media, which only Palin’s conservative celebrators can decipher and resist.

Objectivity is the cornerstone of critical thinking.

There is one other strange thing about the ‘leakers’. If they are just mercenaries looking out for themselves then why are there no John McCain rumours floating about? He was at the top of the ticket and if they are just looking for a scapegoat, he makes a lot more sense than Sarah Palin for that purpose.

sharrukin on November 9, 2008 at 5:26 AM

Not that strange ,in this game she’s just expendable.

You don’t ever sell out your customer , Mccain.
But you can scapegoat the sidekick.

Defending Sarah is about defending democracy.

It’s the political elite ( msm and the self selected party machines ) trying to get rid of one from the people.

Maybe they realized that “cleaning up Washington” just wasn’t empty words coming out of her mouth.

These conservatives preen as especially respectful of regular — or as Palin says, “real” — Americans, whose tribune Palin purports to be. But note the argument that the manipulation of Americans by “the mainstream media” explains the fact that the more Palin campaigned, the less Americans thought of her qualifications. This argument portrays Americans as a bovine herd — or as inert clay in the hands of wily media, which only Palin’s conservative celebrators can decipher and resist.

These conservatives, smitten by a vice presidential choice based on chromosomes, seem eager to compete on the Democrats’ terrain of identity politics, entering the “diversity” sweepstakes they have hitherto rightly deplored. We have seen this movie before. Immediately after the 1972 election, some conservatives laid down the law — the 1976 Republican nominee must be Vice President Spiro Agnew.

This came from George Will’s latest article at
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/11/irony_abounds.html

Words of wisdom the Palinmaniacs would be wise to consider.

And Palin will lead the way to our victory in 2012 with Jindal at her side.

ErinF on November 9, 2008 at 3:09 AM

LOL – now that is funny. Have you let Bobby know he needs to wait on the sidelines for Sara’s coronation?

she is the future of the GOP.

for whoever thinks she talks funny, listen to the blue bloods in the Hamptons.. now that’s a funny accent..

I said Obama’s win was effectively a landslide, in the specific sense that it was the most decisive Democratic non-incumbent victory in long time. And what do you do? You give me a list of all the past elections with your definition of landslides that were either an incumbent or Republican victory. It’s not my fault you can’t fucking read a sentence.

Personality worship isn’t the GOP I know.

haner on November 9, 2008 at 12:14 AM

His victory is just about the same as Clinton’s, in terms of electoral college and percentage win over the Republicans. If you compare the voting shift since 1992, you’ll see the country was much more Republican this time around.

In that desire they are joined by GOP/RINO’s who don’t want to lose their place at the country club either.

The Rockefeller Republicans would rather see a Republican defeat than a conservative victory. John McCain is a case in point. He seems pretty comfortable with losing with honour.

There is one other strange thing about the ‘leakers’. If they are just mercenaries looking out for themselves then why are there no John McCain rumours floating about? He was at the top of the ticket and if they are just looking for a scapegoat, he makes a lot more sense than Sarah Palin for that purpose.