<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBS considered Rush, Coulter for Rather fiasco oversight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:44:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBS considered Rush, Coulter for Rather fiasco oversight &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1745177</link>
		<dc:creator>CBS considered Rush, Coulter for Rather fiasco oversight &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1745177</guid>
		<description>[...] Read about it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read about it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nationspatriotcom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1626105</link>
		<dc:creator>nationspatriotcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1626105</guid>
		<description>Bernie&#039;s my HERO!

I have his book in paperback and Hardcover, and have bought several for friends as gifts a few years back (when it came out)...

It sure opened some eyes, and those who read it were so overwhelmingly &lt;em&gt;shocked&lt;/em&gt; at the enlightenment, they didn&#039;t know what to do with themselves.

At least people ARE starting to see through the web of lies...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernie&#8217;s my HERO!</p>
<p>I have his book in paperback and Hardcover, and have bought several for friends as gifts a few years back (when it came out)&#8230;</p>
<p>It sure opened some eyes, and those who read it were so overwhelmingly <em>shocked</em> at the enlightenment, they didn&#8217;t know what to do with themselves.</p>
<p>At least people ARE starting to see through the web of lies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aslans Girl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1625028</link>
		<dc:creator>Aslans Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1625028</guid>
		<description>Can I just say that this isn&#039;t a good picture of Bernie Goldberg? It looks photoshopped around the chin and neck. He&#039;s much handsomer, really. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming ;-)

-Aslan&#039;s Girl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I just say that this isn&#8217;t a good picture of Bernie Goldberg? It looks photoshopped around the chin and neck. He&#8217;s much handsomer, really. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming ;-)</p>
<p>-Aslan&#8217;s Girl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snaggletoothie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1623943</link>
		<dc:creator>snaggletoothie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1623943</guid>
		<description>Anyone can make a list.  There is no proof that any of these people was ever seriously considered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone can make a list.  There is no proof that any of these people was ever seriously considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainster</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1623383</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1623383</guid>
		<description>Sullivan hadn&#039;t gone completely looney tunes back then; although he supported Kerry he was harshly critical of Rather and Heyward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sullivan hadn&#8217;t gone completely looney tunes back then; although he supported Kerry he was harshly critical of Rather and Heyward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amendment X</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1623261</link>
		<dc:creator>Amendment X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1623261</guid>
		<description>Ed-
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;DRAT!!!!!!!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; You and I &lt;strong&gt;still&lt;/strong&gt; haven&#039;t made the list.
I need to seek a different strategy here...
Wait...I have it!
Seeing how Joe the Plumber is treated for a simple question and then comparing that singular inquiry with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.savagerepublican.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my blog&lt;/a&gt;, well, I&#039;m believe I&#039;m up up for &quot;Enemy of the State&quot; and &quot;Heresy Against the Selected One&quot; lists.
See you &lt;a href=&quot;http://lh5.ggpht.com/_n_44qAUrJaU/R4WIh0SwETI/AAAAAAAABXU/6zdpXl7mSeI/P1010070.JPG&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;!
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Let&#039;s roll!&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed-<br />
<strong><em>DRAT!!!!!!!</em></strong> You and I <strong>still</strong> haven&#8217;t made the list.<br />
I need to seek a different strategy here&#8230;<br />
Wait&#8230;I have it!<br />
Seeing how Joe the Plumber is treated for a simple question and then comparing that singular inquiry with <a href="http://www.savagerepublican.com" rel="nofollow">my blog</a>, well, I&#8217;m believe I&#8217;m up up for &#8220;Enemy of the State&#8221; and &#8220;Heresy Against the Selected One&#8221; lists.<br />
See you <a href="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_n_44qAUrJaU/R4WIh0SwETI/AAAAAAAABXU/6zdpXl7mSeI/P1010070.JPG" rel="nofollow">here</a>!<br />
<strong><em>Let&#8217;s roll!</em> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes Online</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622487</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622487</guid>
		<description>The sad thing is that, I&#039;m sure that I could walk up to 25 random people this afternoon and ask them about the Rathergate Memos and get blank stares in reply from at least 24.  A major network tries to take down a sitting President running for re-election with poorly sourced and unverified information and nobody really cares.

We are our own worst enemies...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad thing is that, I&#8217;m sure that I could walk up to 25 random people this afternoon and ask them about the Rathergate Memos and get blank stares in reply from at least 24.  A major network tries to take down a sitting President running for re-election with poorly sourced and unverified information and nobody really cares.</p>
<p>We are our own worst enemies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedwagon82</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622465</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedwagon82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622465</guid>
		<description>LOL Andrew Sullivan? The only thing he would say is that CBS should have made more forgeries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Andrew Sullivan? The only thing he would say is that CBS should have made more forgeries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622464</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622464</guid>
		<description>It would have been &lt;em&gt;awesome&lt;/em&gt; to have the Rathergate report written by PJ O&#039;Rourke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have been <em>awesome</em> to have the Rathergate report written by PJ O&#8217;Rourke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdubya</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622439</link>
		<dc:creator>jdubya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622439</guid>
		<description>Andrew Sullivan 
Christopher Hitchens 

These people?  A who&#039;s who among the right?

Am I late on this?  When were they considered right? That is in both senses of the meaning...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Sullivan<br />
Christopher Hitchens </p>
<p>These people?  A who&#8217;s who among the right?</p>
<p>Am I late on this?  When were they considered right? That is in both senses of the meaning&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Dumbo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622430</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Dumbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622430</guid>
		<description>MSM is still dead to me.   I long for the day when my grandchildren ask me, Grandpa what was CBS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSM is still dead to me.   I long for the day when my grandchildren ask me, Grandpa what was CBS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hump1201</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622331</link>
		<dc:creator>hump1201</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622331</guid>
		<description>If journalists were to run the world, I&#039;d want Thomas Sowell as President.  I&#039;d probably put Krauthammer as Defense Sec.  Jonah Goldberg as the WH press secretary?  This doesn&#039;t have much to do with the thread, but it was a fun conversation I had with my dad the other day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If journalists were to run the world, I&#8217;d want Thomas Sowell as President.  I&#8217;d probably put Krauthammer as Defense Sec.  Jonah Goldberg as the WH press secretary?  This doesn&#8217;t have much to do with the thread, but it was a fun conversation I had with my dad the other day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlander</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622325</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622325</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Watching the media attempt to gloss over all the ills of a nation in crisis UNDER A COMPLETE DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED GOVERNMENT will be a comedy.
Rovin on November 7, 2008 at 10:58 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Sean Hannity&#039;s quote about the media dying in 2008 is exactly right.  Republicans have got to better harness the power of blogging, vlogging, social networking (facebook, myspace, twitter), talk radio, and Fox News to open up an avenue of communication to your voters.

Republicans also need to learn how to use the MSM more to their advantage.  Yes, they are going to be biased, but: (i) all news organizations love to report leaks, so use that; (ii) some shows and formats lend themselves to bias more than others (e.g., edited interviews with Katie and Charlie and live appearances on &quot;The View&quot; are bad;  a live interview on Meet The Press is less bad); and (iii) better message discipline can blunt the media&#039;s attack.  The Bush strategy of ignoring the media backfired famously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Watching the media attempt to gloss over all the ills of a nation in crisis UNDER A COMPLETE DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED GOVERNMENT will be a comedy.<br />
Rovin on November 7, 2008 at 10:58 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sean Hannity&#8217;s quote about the media dying in 2008 is exactly right.  Republicans have got to better harness the power of blogging, vlogging, social networking (facebook, myspace, twitter), talk radio, and Fox News to open up an avenue of communication to your voters.</p>
<p>Republicans also need to learn how to use the MSM more to their advantage.  Yes, they are going to be biased, but: (i) all news organizations love to report leaks, so use that; (ii) some shows and formats lend themselves to bias more than others (e.g., edited interviews with Katie and Charlie and live appearances on &#8220;The View&#8221; are bad;  a live interview on Meet The Press is less bad); and (iii) better message discipline can blunt the media&#8217;s attack.  The Bush strategy of ignoring the media backfired famously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Corky</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622321</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Corky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622321</guid>
		<description>I appreciate some of Bernie&#039;s other books. The 100 people who are screwing up America is amusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate some of Bernie&#8217;s other books. The 100 people who are screwing up America is amusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: landlines</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622317</link>
		<dc:creator>landlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622317</guid>
		<description>Without a prompt formulation and aggressive execution of a plan for reform, this entire exercise is nothing more than a feeble CYA for CBS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without a prompt formulation and aggressive execution of a plan for reform, this entire exercise is nothing more than a feeble CYA for CBS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldwarrior</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622307</link>
		<dc:creator>coldwarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622307</guid>
		<description>Of all the phenomena of the past two decades, the conspiracy theory has triumphed above all others.  

If no clear answer can be found...it is a conspiracy to cover up.  If a plausible answer can be found, Occam&#039;s Razor being evident, then it is a conspiracy to mislead the public.

The 9/11 &quot;truthers&quot; are not all the unusual these days...still.  Cynthia McKinney&#039;s statement of &quot;fact&quot; that thousands of New Orleans residents were systematically murdered by the federal government is not all that unusual as well.  Maxie Power&#039;s still very much alive &quot;fact&quot; that CIA-imported crack to commit genocide against Blacks is still a popular widely-held &quot;truth.&quot; 

And Dan Rather?  He still clings to the notion, his fixed belief, that his reportage was unimpeachable and there was/is a conspiracy to oust him because he was too outspoken.

Any person who ever served in the military and paid a modicum of attention, could see readily that the memos, in format alone, were fake.  The blogs made it more clear when we got into the technical aspects of their production.  They were fake.  The purveyor of these memos...a proven liar.

Rather&#039;s claim of &quot;fake but accurate&quot; was accepted by shockingly large segment of the population...which is no surprise.

Conspiracy?

No.  Stupidity.

Stupidity, pure and simple.      

Rather has friends, fellow travelers and a stupid segment of the public who still to this day insist that the Bush Air National Guard &quot;memos&quot; were 100% accurate and beyond reproach.

The Thornburgh report (regardless of who was on the staff) should have made this clear...and did a poor job of it along the way...and the conspiracy theories will be with us for decades to come.  Guess it was that mistaken desire to appear &quot;non-partisan&quot; that turned what should have been hard-driven fact-based investigation into a politically acceptable pan of mush.  Not at all surprisingly similar to the the 9-11 Commission Report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the phenomena of the past two decades, the conspiracy theory has triumphed above all others.  </p>
<p>If no clear answer can be found&#8230;it is a conspiracy to cover up.  If a plausible answer can be found, Occam&#8217;s Razor being evident, then it is a conspiracy to mislead the public.</p>
<p>The 9/11 &#8220;truthers&#8221; are not all the unusual these days&#8230;still.  Cynthia McKinney&#8217;s statement of &#8220;fact&#8221; that thousands of New Orleans residents were systematically murdered by the federal government is not all that unusual as well.  Maxie Power&#8217;s still very much alive &#8220;fact&#8221; that CIA-imported crack to commit genocide against Blacks is still a popular widely-held &#8220;truth.&#8221; </p>
<p>And Dan Rather?  He still clings to the notion, his fixed belief, that his reportage was unimpeachable and there was/is a conspiracy to oust him because he was too outspoken.</p>
<p>Any person who ever served in the military and paid a modicum of attention, could see readily that the memos, in format alone, were fake.  The blogs made it more clear when we got into the technical aspects of their production.  They were fake.  The purveyor of these memos&#8230;a proven liar.</p>
<p>Rather&#8217;s claim of &#8220;fake but accurate&#8221; was accepted by shockingly large segment of the population&#8230;which is no surprise.</p>
<p>Conspiracy?</p>
<p>No.  Stupidity.</p>
<p>Stupidity, pure and simple.      </p>
<p>Rather has friends, fellow travelers and a stupid segment of the public who still to this day insist that the Bush Air National Guard &#8220;memos&#8221; were 100% accurate and beyond reproach.</p>
<p>The Thornburgh report (regardless of who was on the staff) should have made this clear&#8230;and did a poor job of it along the way&#8230;and the conspiracy theories will be with us for decades to come.  Guess it was that mistaken desire to appear &#8220;non-partisan&#8221; that turned what should have been hard-driven fact-based investigation into a politically acceptable pan of mush.  Not at all surprisingly similar to the the 9-11 Commission Report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuckeyeSam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622296</link>
		<dc:creator>BuckeyeSam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622296</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s with the photo of Bernie? 

He looks like The Great Gazoo from &lt;em&gt;The Flintstones&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with the photo of Bernie? </p>
<p>He looks like The Great Gazoo from <em>The Flintstones</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgharris</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622292</link>
		<dc:creator>tgharris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622292</guid>
		<description>Goldberg&#039;s name caught my eye....But I think a better choice might have been Krauthammer.

I like to listen to Goldberg, but Krauthammer strikes me as being better at verbal evisceration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goldberg&#8217;s name caught my eye&#8230;.But I think a better choice might have been Krauthammer.</p>
<p>I like to listen to Goldberg, but Krauthammer strikes me as being better at verbal evisceration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tantor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622291</link>
		<dc:creator>Tantor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622291</guid>
		<description>The fake memos of Rathergate really opened my eyes.  When you saw the fake memo juxtaposed over the identical memo written on Word and their fonts were identical, the game was up there.  There is no way that a squadron typewriter from the 1970s could have produced a document identical to Word.

I was just astonished when I flipped through Mary Mapes book and she wrote with a straight face that the typewritten document had been converted into the Word Times New Roman font by faxing it.  WTF?  Not only was it a lie, it was an obviously bad lie.

That was a turning point for me.  Before I read that sentence, I thought that the media got things wrong because their perspective was different and so they interpreted things differently, kinda like the blind men and the elephant.  However, after I read Mapes alibi, I realized that they were simply lying.  Worse yet, they had been lyingo for years and I never knew it, believing it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fake memos of Rathergate really opened my eyes.  When you saw the fake memo juxtaposed over the identical memo written on Word and their fonts were identical, the game was up there.  There is no way that a squadron typewriter from the 1970s could have produced a document identical to Word.</p>
<p>I was just astonished when I flipped through Mary Mapes book and she wrote with a straight face that the typewritten document had been converted into the Word Times New Roman font by faxing it.  WTF?  Not only was it a lie, it was an obviously bad lie.</p>
<p>That was a turning point for me.  Before I read that sentence, I thought that the media got things wrong because their perspective was different and so they interpreted things differently, kinda like the blind men and the elephant.  However, after I read Mapes alibi, I realized that they were simply lying.  Worse yet, they had been lyingo for years and I never knew it, believing it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hening</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622287</link>
		<dc:creator>Hening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622287</guid>
		<description>If Krauthammer ever had an army, I would be the first to enlist.  

The resistance grows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Krauthammer ever had an army, I would be the first to enlist.  </p>
<p>The resistance grows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clnurnberg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622286</link>
		<dc:creator>clnurnberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622286</guid>
		<description>Well the shamsters will be happy that you were pleased by their impressive list of immediately discounted people they &quot;considered&quot; I suspect it was a &quot;Wouldn&#039;t it be fynny if we considered....&quot; list and they laughed their asses off as they tossed another honest voice onto the scrap heap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the shamsters will be happy that you were pleased by their impressive list of immediately discounted people they &#8220;considered&#8221; I suspect it was a &#8220;Wouldn&#8217;t it be fynny if we considered&#8230;.&#8221; list and they laughed their asses off as they tossed another honest voice onto the scrap heap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tacitus_SGL</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622283</link>
		<dc:creator>Tacitus_SGL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622283</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sold on that book. Getting a copy today.

Also, I&#039;m impressed that CBS managed to put this list together - Buckley (Sr.) and Safire would have surely had some interesting things to say about Mr. Rather&#039;s conduct during the memogate scandal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sold on that book. Getting a copy today.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m impressed that CBS managed to put this list together &#8211; Buckley (Sr.) and Safire would have surely had some interesting things to say about Mr. Rather&#8217;s conduct during the memogate scandal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Punchenko</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622281</link>
		<dc:creator>Punchenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622281</guid>
		<description>LOL. Lou Dobbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. Lou Dobbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VanPalin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622254</link>
		<dc:creator>VanPalin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622254</guid>
		<description>Good thing CBS has gotten rid of its bias.
/sarc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing CBS has gotten rid of its bias.<br />
/sarc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/07/cbs-considered-rush-coulter-for-rather-fiasco-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-1622250</link>
		<dc:creator>Torch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=33724#comment-1622250</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen the media in the same light since reading &quot;Bias&quot;. It&#039;s a wonderful book that really opened my eyes to how the media truly is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the media in the same light since reading &#8220;Bias&#8221;. It&#8217;s a wonderful book that really opened my eyes to how the media truly is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
