A bright spot for Republicans: governors
posted at 2:20 pm on November 7, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Chris Cillizza notices that the Republicans managed to avert disaster at the gubernatorial level on Tuesday, re-electing the Republican governors targeted by the DNC in key states. Despite losing Indiana and Vermont to Barack Obama, the GOP managed to hold onto the executive positions. The Republican Governors Association recommends that the party look outside the Beltway for its future leadership:
One of the few bright spots for Republicans on Tuesday came at the state level where all four incumbent GOP governors won reelection, including Indiana’s Mitch Daniels and Vermont’s Jim Douglas, who were targeted by national Democrats. (Not all was hunky-dory for Republicans at the gubernatorial level, however, as they lost open seat races in Missouri and North Carolina and failed to out Washington Gov. Christine Gregoire.)
In the wake of Tuesday’s election Republican Governors Association executive director Nick Ayers insisted that the best — and perhaps only — way for the GOP to rise again was to look to the states.
“For two years I’ve said we will not win back control on the House or Senate or maintain control of the White House until we first re-establish our party at the state level and build it around governors,” said Ayers. “Today that’s never been more clear.”
If that’s true, then who are the nascent leaders that the GOP needs to tap? Cillizza picks five, in ascending order:
- Haley Barbour
- Mark Sanford
- Sarah Palin
- Tim Pawlenty
- Bobby Jindal
I’m a little surprised to see Mitt Romney’s name off of this list. He’s not a governor now, but Mark Sanford won’t be governor for much longer, either. Romney has the economic savvy to speak to the crisis facing the US now, and while he may not have excited the base had he been nominated, Romney would have provided a trustworthy figure on economic policy in the aftermath of the collapse.
Having said that, this does look like a line-up that Republicans can enthusiastically support. In 2012, Jindal might be on his second term with a solid record of reform in a state that desperately needs it. If he can clean up the political sewer that is Louisiana state politics in four years, he could be a formidable candidate against Barack Obama, especially if Obama keeps appointing people like Rahm Emanuel to high-ranking positions.
Sarah Palin can also come back strong in 2012. Right now, she has to shake off the small-minded idiots who think they can protect themselves from criticism over McCain’s losing campaign through catty gossip. Once that’s accomplished and the gossips exposed for what they are, she can take a leadership position in national politics, especially on energy and reform. The Republican base clearly loves Palin, and she will have the name recognition needed to run as the first woman in either party to top a national ticket.
Sanford will have to find something significant to do after 2010 if he wants to remain relevant. He’s terrific, as I have experienced first-hand, at espousing real libertarian-conservative values. He probably should have run this year, being in his second term as Governor in South Carolina, but decided against it. Too bad; I think he could have won the nomination.
Barbour is a mystery to me on this list. He’s a good governor, but he hasn’t really asserted himself as a party leader outside of his state. His skillful work during Hurricane Katrina went largely unnoticed because of the disaster in New Orleans, and maybe Barbour missed his shot. If the GOP wants national leadership, it looks like Jindal, Palin, and Romney have passed Barbour in those sweepstakes.
One other name might arise during the next four years: Matt Blunt. The young governor of Missouri decided against a run for re-election, but he remains popular and also does a good job in campaigning for conservative values. If the GOP can get him back from his “sabbatical” in the private sector, they will be pleasantly surprised.
Update: I know that Sanford is governor of South Carolina, not NC, and still has two years left — just had a strange combination of brain fade this afternoon. Thanks to Brian for correcting me. And Barbour was RNC chair at one time, but that was more than ten years ago.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Palin and Jindal FTW
or Huck in there somewhere.
YellowDawg on November 7, 2008 at 2:24 PM
Sanford is Gov of South Carolina, not NC which is a Dem state.
but since you brought it up. one of the tragedies of the Obama wave and increased black vote was Pat McCrory running for Gov. in NC. Most years he would’ve won
jp on November 7, 2008 at 2:24 PM
If it’s true that Mitt owns a home in CA, and if Pres-Elect The One taps Arnie for his Cabinet, then Mitt can walk the walk that Arnie only talked in CA…
ocbrat on November 7, 2008 at 2:25 PM
The name Republicans have to watch out for is Crist. His name will absolutely come up and he’ll be another McCain.
bj1126 on November 7, 2008 at 2:25 PM
My Man Mitch should could be a poster child for fiscal conservatism. He turned Indiana around after decades of Dem disaster. Though he gets trashed repeatedly here by the media.
Right Tracker on November 7, 2008 at 2:26 PM
I guess Sonny Purdue (R-GA) is a bit of a middle-of-the-road Gov., plus he has one of those funny names.
Techie on November 7, 2008 at 2:26 PM
Go Sarah! Go Bobby!
HuskerNate on November 7, 2008 at 2:26 PM
Like our country. The GOP needs to also rebuild it’s infrastructure. We need the visible people like Palin and Jindal. But we also need some strong behind the scenes people.
No more of the trash that just work for campaigns but don’t really believe in the candidates.
CableDude on November 7, 2008 at 2:26 PM
No more DemLites!!
AubieJon on November 7, 2008 at 2:27 PM
Executive experience will be important next time around.. many/most senators just don’t have any. If Obama will be the disaster we all think, Gov.s or executives will be the ticket.
beththebaker on November 7, 2008 at 2:27 PM
Maybe if R’s spent more time on state races (Sec of State, etc and trying to get people cons into teaching positions) and less time worrying about ‘the next time’ they wouldn’t have to struggle so much.
GOP problems come from the ground up as well as the bottom down.
lorien1973 on November 7, 2008 at 2:28 PM
I think this is the opposite of true. Who broadcasted “Slick Wall Street Executive” more than Mitt Romney? I have very serious doubts that this is the kind of image blue-collar populists were ripe to respond to in the economic crisis.
Lehosh on November 7, 2008 at 2:28 PM
Huckabee should stay with the television gig. Or start a band. Or do just about anything other than run for office.
myrenovations on November 7, 2008 at 2:29 PM
Pssst, Ed. Sanford’s in South Carolina. Not North.
rbj on November 7, 2008 at 2:29 PM
Economic conservatives were the ones who stayed home last Tuesday.
Vashta.Nerada on November 7, 2008 at 2:29 PM
I like Sonny, but after Obama (Jimmy Carter on steroids) the last thing people will do is elect another Gov from GA.. much to my dismay…
beththebaker on November 7, 2008 at 2:29 PM
Not being picky, but it’s “Perdue”, which ironically enough is French for ‘lost’.
AubieJon on November 7, 2008 at 2:30 PM
Uh, Barbour was the RNC Chairman from 1993-1997 when they regained control of the House & Senate.
tgibson1962 on November 7, 2008 at 2:30 PM
well yeah I really doubt that Huck is a national player anymore. You know that if ciliza thought he was Huck would have been near the top of this list.
ousoonerfan15 on November 7, 2008 at 2:30 PM
Ed -
Haley Barbour was RNC chairman, some years ago.
capricorn on November 7, 2008 at 2:31 PM
Palin-Jindal 2012
Firebird on November 7, 2008 at 2:32 PM
Huck for Television Talk Show Host 2012.
BKennedy on November 7, 2008 at 2:33 PM
Romney/Jindal 2012.
awake on November 7, 2008 at 2:33 PM
Uh huh. 8 million fiscal cons stayed home dreaming of Romney.
Lehosh on November 7, 2008 at 2:34 PM
I kinda fail to see how Crist is any more of a squish than Romney. And he’ll probably get a second term. I don’t care for him that much, but I never got why Romney was da bomb.
McLovin on November 7, 2008 at 2:35 PM
We’ll have to see how Obama does in the next year or so. If the economy improves (due to him or not. Most likely not), he will have a strong chance of being reelected.
If the economy continues to tanks, they should be a shoe in to beat him.
The problem is that, as an American, I’m torn. I don’t want the economy to tank and I don’t want Obama……
Scary, isn’t it….
CableDude on November 7, 2008 at 2:37 PM
I like the hell out of Bobby Jindal and I think he is absolutely going to be a player in the coming years.
Texas74 on November 7, 2008 at 2:37 PM
From Rasmussen,
If Palin runs in 2012, she will win. McCain lost because he was for the bailout. Simple as that. GOP stayed home in colossal numbers this year because of that.
Also expect more attacks on Palin as she is a real threat now from both Dem and GOP leaders.
MrX on November 7, 2008 at 2:37 PM
I didn’t stay home; but I certainly wouldn’t have voted for McCain if he didn’t select someone who wasn’t an fiscal conservative.
lorien1973 on November 7, 2008 at 2:37 PM
What about Bob Riley of Alabama…
cptthumper on November 7, 2008 at 2:37 PM
Another guy to look at: John Hoeven of ND…anybody know anything about him?
Very successful and very popular.
joepub on November 7, 2008 at 2:37 PM
He’s giving a speech in Iowa on 11/22. I’m curious if we’ll have video of that.
lorien1973 on November 7, 2008 at 2:38 PM
Romney? Isn’t one RINO nominee enough?
jacrews on November 7, 2008 at 2:38 PM
I have my doubts about Romney. He made a mess of Massachusetts healthcare. I think he would be another Bush in the White House. Forget about anybody who ran this year and look to the new blood.
jerryofva on November 7, 2008 at 2:39 PM
Those five governors are very STRONG.
Our future is bright – we just have to weather a very bumpy four years to get there
gophergirl on November 7, 2008 at 2:39 PM
A name I am all too familiar with as a Floridian I can not stand him.
I miss Jeb, as I will miss George too when he is out of office.
PiggieSez on November 7, 2008 at 2:40 PM
Romney only looked strong because of the weak competition. Think about it. Rudy was a fiasco. Fred apparently didn’t really want the job. Huckabee is sorta kinda conservative, but not enough to get excited about. McCain… ug.
I love Palin. Really I do. But I’d have to go with Jindal on the top of that ticket. And how would Sarah ever run for VP again?
Sugar Land on November 7, 2008 at 2:40 PM
From what I understand; it was democrats fiddling with Romney’s plan that made it a mess.
Which, really, should say everything you need to know about government getting involved in anything.
lorien1973 on November 7, 2008 at 2:40 PM
I don’t want to see Romney or Huckabee. I like both and I think they both have a place in the party. But not as president. Besides, if Huck pulls off being a successful TV personage, he won’t want to run.
Let’s bring in the new blood.
CableDude on November 7, 2008 at 2:40 PM
So far the brightest star.
beththebaker on November 7, 2008 at 2:41 PM
He’s done a good job here, attracting lots of business and new industries, including agriculture related business.
AubieJon on November 7, 2008 at 2:41 PM
Barbour’s problem is that he was a (very successfull) lobbyist before returning to Miss to run for Governor. He can probably have a Senate seat if he wants it in 6 years (Thad Cochran is 71), but because of the lobbyist taint he’ll never be a strong candidate for Pres or VP.
BuzzCrutcher on November 7, 2008 at 2:41 PM
Agreed, and Lindsey Graham. Alan Colmes repeatedly quoted Lindsey Graham singing the praises of Rohm Emmanuel last night.
Renae on November 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM
wasn’t he already in the house or senate at one point?
lorien1973 on November 7, 2008 at 2:43 PM
I still think Romney has a place in the upper echelon of GOP management. He’s just too competent not to be used in some substantial capacity.
spmat on November 7, 2008 at 2:43 PM
AubieJon on November 7, 2008 at 2:41 PM
beththebaker on November 7, 2008 at 2:44 PM
isn’t jindal a creationist
Tim Pawlenty knows more than all of them put together.
tomas on November 7, 2008 at 2:45 PM
You are just up I-85 from me!
AubieJon on November 7, 2008 at 2:46 PM
We already know he’s smart. Thanks for reminding us.
AubieJon on November 7, 2008 at 2:47 PM
kids in private school in LaGrange… I shop in Valley alot :)
Howdy, neighbor!
beththebaker on November 7, 2008 at 2:48 PM
It’s really important that we do. I’m really concerned about Bobby Jindal’s ability with retail politics/ speechmaking. I’m afraid that he’ll come off to wonky and unable to explain his ideas without using incredibly technical jargon. We definitely need to kick the tires a few times before we proclaim him the Messiah.
Illinidiva on November 7, 2008 at 2:48 PM
But Pawlenty is sort… dull. Not in a bad way but in a way that makes him easily overlooked.
If Obama hasn’t turned off his cult-like appeal by 2012, we’re really going to need someone more inspirational than in years past.
myrenovations on November 7, 2008 at 2:49 PM
Ugh. Repulicans/conservatives really need to let Sarah Palin go. If you love her, you’ll set her free. I happen to like her, but she’s just not politically savvy and sharp to run for President and she’s way too polarizing. She is not what we need right now. I would much rather see her run for Congress.
Republigal on November 7, 2008 at 2:49 PM
And that hurts him how?
I like Jindal. But he’s only been governor for just about a year. I know 2012 is 4 years away, but let’s let him do some things first. He is probably more of 2016 or 2020 material. He’s young (37). He was the youngest governor ever elected in the US.
I know that Obama proves that you don’t need experience to be POTUS, but I would still prefer it.
CableDude on November 7, 2008 at 2:51 PM
I really like Bobby Jindal, but you think the media (and the party elite) went after Palin, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.
His religious views will be more savaged than Mitt’s were.
Any Conservative candidate will get ripped to shreds if we don’t have our ground game built up.
50 States, 50 Campaigns.
ChrisM on November 7, 2008 at 2:52 PM
Also, while some of us are going to prefer one candidate over another, it might be a good idea not to shoot our party in the foot with the “he’s a creationist” “he’s a mormon” “she handles snakes” “he’s a freaky televangelist” stuff.
myrenovations on November 7, 2008 at 2:52 PM
Sarah Palin at the top of the ticket with a national security heavyweight, someone with military credentials. Her knowledge of energy, a little more experience, and I think the war will be a big issue in four years… sad to say it.
chunderroad on November 7, 2008 at 2:53 PM
Here is a video of Jindal. Its long but he’s a good talker.
goldeagle11 on November 7, 2008 at 2:53 PM
Gingrich / Jindal
James on November 7, 2008 at 2:53 PM
Just let her be the governor of Alaska for a couple of more years and then judge her political skills
Her record shows that she is a great politician
joey24007 on November 7, 2008 at 2:54 PM
Here is a video of Jindal. Its long but he’s a good talker
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3293277670200435039&ei=eJwUScfbEIL8rAK9gY3PDQ&q=bobby+jindal&hl=en
goldeagle11 on November 7, 2008 at 2:54 PM
You can probably tell from my moniker where I’m located. I used to teach accounting at the Southern Union campus in Valley.
AubieJon on November 7, 2008 at 2:54 PM
Give up on Romney already! He’s another McCain – a rebranded Democrat.
angelat0763 on November 7, 2008 at 2:57 PM
Agreed there….. He and Palin have a similar background, but I really couldn’t see Pawlentry giving Palin’s speech at the convention.
The only one that has any sort of rock star status is Sarah Palin.. I guess Jindal could surprise, but he strikes me as being only slightly less boring than Pawlentry.
Illinidiva on November 7, 2008 at 2:57 PM
I don’t care who as long as:
1) They have hair and it isn’t white.
2) They have executive experience.
3) They are under the age of 60.
4) They are not a sitting Senator.
5) They are strong conservatives.
6) They can speak extemporaneously.
7) They have something resembling charisma.
8) They can articulate the conservative vision (The Obamacan in my office says he was most attracted to Obama’s vision).
I was one of those who thought running a centrist Republican was our only way to win this year. I was wrong. Seven million Republicans stayed home to prove it to me. No more RINOs for me.
I’d like to think Romney’s religion wouldn’t be a factor, but I don’t want seven million religious conservatives to stay home to prove me wrong on that one, either. Give him a cabinet post in charge of the economy.
Kafir on November 7, 2008 at 2:57 PM
The economy will, on its own, contract a bit before growing again after a few quarters, just like it did in 2001. However, it will take another hit is about a year when the Bush tax cuts expire (only the highest tax rate matters for this), if not sooner if Obama signs his tax plan into law. The rest of Obama’s plans will also push the economy down if he gets them through. The fed may not be stupid enough to let us fall into a deflationary depression, but stagflation seems likely. Count on the press to spin it in Obama’s favor.
The bottom like is, Carter II is the best case scenario, FDR II (possibly complete with its own world war) a worst case scenario.
Count to 10 on November 7, 2008 at 2:58 PM
What is “vision”?
All Obama had was a grab bag of wish lists.
Count to 10 on November 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM
I am a Sanford woman.
angelat0763 on November 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM
Huckabee’s problem is that economically, he is very nearly as left-wing as Obama. His only conservative credentials are of the religious variety.
kiltedscotsman5 on November 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM
WATCH THIS.
I’m sold on him after 2 minutes!
I had seen him on tv before, and while clear speaker, seemed kinda monotone an wonky.
But he has good charisma and his voice actually. changes. tone.
Isn’t he like a rhodes scholar or something? I remember hearing he had some major academic record.
I think that’s important. We are coming across as the ANTI-learning party, not just anti-elites.
oh, and i like how some moron changes the channel to msnbc/andrea mitchell after 4 minutes (dont worry, it goes back to bobby!)
battleoflepanto1571 on November 7, 2008 at 3:01 PM
Ed, I’d be really careful here. From my thinking…
If the Republicans don’t clean house and get their act together within the next few months, I’d happily go with a new Conservative 3rd Party if Palin / Jindal would switch.
Republicans better watch themselves. I know a few conservatives, and this was the last compromise straw. No more bi-partisanship, no more reaching across isles, no more moderates leading the party with no direction!
If the RNC leadership wants to get lost in the jungle with no moral compass… I say let them get lost and die.
dominigan on November 7, 2008 at 3:01 PM
Hey, did Michelle ever fully vet Ed? :)
SAZMD on November 7, 2008 at 3:01 PM
This is why we don’t elect Senators who live in their own DC, horse-trading, elitist cocoon. Governors are actually responsible to their people and know how conservative principles work.
lodge on November 7, 2008 at 3:02 PM
count me in with the “jindal 2016″ crowd…. not next time
i fear wasting him against obama in 2012 where we face another tsunami of youth/blacks.
put up palin or someone that would be great witha win, but that probably wont win, in 2012. then let jindal do it in 2016
battleoflepanto1571 on November 7, 2008 at 3:02 PM
Its time to get behind Newt Gingrich. Enough playing around. He is the one person alive with the ability to be a Lincoln-level President. Look into his think tank work, watch his speeches on youtube, get to know him more if you don’t already. We need to unite around him.
Gingrich – Jindal in 2012. Palin is great, let her gain experience as governor and maybe in the Senate. Jindal has already resurrected a damaged state and served in congress, and Newt’s experience is obvious. Plus he was “above the fray” before Obama made it kewl.
Its time to get behind Newt Gingrich now. Now.
Brains on November 7, 2008 at 3:02 PM
I agree. The Dems and the RINO’s both recognize her potential, and that’s why they’re so terrified of her. They’ll be doing everything they can to try and destroy her politically.
AZCoyote on November 7, 2008 at 3:04 PM
I think Palin should wait until 2016 or later to go on any ticket. Jindal won’t want her as a VP, she will still be “tainted” – like it or not (I don’t) she induces such a viceral reaction from the stupid left that Jindal doesn’t need it. Jindal by himself will energize the base, as much as Palin does. There probably isn’t really any other Republican women to partner with Jindal, so maybe a Jindal/Sanford or Sanford/Jindal. I like Romney but man, he seemed to take such a hit for being Mormon, and for moving to the left to become Governor of the most LEFT state in the Country.
As for Huckabee, keep him AWAY from the capaign trail. That guy is horrible. I’m even okay if he stays on weekend Fox News when I don’t watch. He behaved so poorly and immature towards Romney, I hold Huck partly responsible for our loss this year, he kept votes from Romney deliberately by staying in the race.
mngirl on November 7, 2008 at 3:04 PM
I have one suggestion. The need for a REAL 3rd party is now. My suggestion–Constitution Party. Which I dub the NEW Republican Party. You see the Republicans today are Democrats and the Dems today are Marxist/Leninist/Socialists driven by corporate fascists like Soros and Move On. Just remember, Obama chastised the Constitution.
I suggest to the Obamabots and members of Hot Air to read the platform of the party.
BobAnthony on November 7, 2008 at 3:05 PM
Maybe some of the Louisiana parish presidents will have an inside scoop on Governor Jindal and can testify to his leadership style and accomplishments. What do you think?
Christien on November 7, 2008 at 3:06 PM
That’s right! The only bipartisanship we should accept in the future is when the left/moderates agree with US!
AubieJon on November 7, 2008 at 3:08 PM
Yeah … I’m sure they can draw the tinfoil hat crowd nicely
joey24007 on November 7, 2008 at 3:08 PM
Jindal/Steele
Discuss.
Christien on November 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM
No, because there’s no reason Newt Gingrich shouldn’t be running in 2012. Let people like Steele and Palin gain more experience first.
Brains on November 7, 2008 at 3:12 PM
Bobby is my guy for 2012.
If it is Palin, so be it.
These two will be the front-runners for the nomination.
jencab on November 7, 2008 at 3:12 PM
I LOVE Jindal. He is so eloquent and clearly brilliant. Now, if he had Paul Ryan along as VP, he’d get every woman left of center and to right to vote for him. (I know this is so incredibly shallow, but he is so HOT!)
Republigal on November 7, 2008 at 3:13 PM
Not only that, he has the right ideas.
Count to 10 on November 7, 2008 at 3:14 PM
I’m not clear on the “…especially if…” part. I fully expect Obama to continue making such appointments.
whitetop on November 7, 2008 at 3:15 PM
OT – Liebermann is now rejecting Reid and may caucus with republicans
Vashta.Nerada on November 7, 2008 at 3:20 PM
Let them fight it out (as civilly as this year) in the Republican primaries.
Gingrich might be a good RNC chair.
Count to 10 on November 7, 2008 at 3:20 PM
Ed, if Our Dear Leader stumbles into a (reasonably) successful first term, do we throw a sacrificial lamb onto the altar in 2012 and save The Great GOP Hope for 2016? I would hate to waste a good pick if he/she does not have a chance to win. Maybe President Beyond My Pay Grade could run unopposed in 2012…
Mr_Magoo on November 7, 2008 at 3:21 PM
After the beating Jindal took during the legislative pay fiasco in Louisiana, I will need convincing that he has reformed his ways and isn’t just an opportunist.
Not Air jumped on his bandwagon and couldn’t figure out what everyone was clamoring about until the commenters spelled it out directly. I’d think Hot Air’s contributors would have learned a lesson from that…
Vatican Watcher on November 7, 2008 at 3:22 PM
Romney doesn’t come off as authentic, and probably never will. That’s why he was left off.
It's Vintage, Duh on November 7, 2008 at 3:24 PM
Pawlenty barely survived ’06 because he tends RINO. That dog won’t hunt.
hpb on November 7, 2008 at 3:24 PM
Ed, having seen Sarah for a “full 9 weeks,” do you think she would be a better appointed “worker bee” than an elected official? How about Energy Czar or Homeland Security Chief? Just askin’
Mr_Magoo on November 7, 2008 at 3:24 PM
I really don’t see that. He might energize David Brooks and Peggy Noonan. I think that the base was energized by Palin because of the Mrs. Smith Goes to Washington factor. I don’t see Bobby Jindal (Rhodes Scholar policy wonk) having the same effect. I’ve seen a few interviews with him, and he comes off more as a college professor than a plausible President. That’s really not going to fly against Hope! and Change!
Illinidiva on November 7, 2008 at 3:26 PM
I’d love to see Jindal/Steele in the next election
CookeyD on November 7, 2008 at 3:26 PM
Look outside the beltway…didn’t Palin prove that? Didn’t Reagan prove that, and didn’t Bush the insider prove that beltway in noway.
right2bright on November 7, 2008 at 3:28 PM
Perdue from Ga is a definite “NO”. Switched parties a few years back. Glad to see a Republican exec. for us in GA, but he would not have been my first pick. Besides, given the embarassing fact that Jimmy Carter is the sacred son of GA, we’ll never have another POTUS from here. No telling how many generations we’ll have to go through to erase that pox on our house!! Newt would be as close as we could get and he’s got some marital baggage (on his 3rd wife, cheated on 2nd wife, crappy treatment of 1st wife rumors, etc.). I have really been impressed with Steele and must give a second to Riley from AL.
ellenb on November 7, 2008 at 3:29 PM
Gov. Sanford is the real deal…we just need to find something for him between 2010 and 2012 after his 2nd term expires. I wish he could somehow get Lindsey’s seat.
He is just too much of a conservative treasure to be unemployed for 2 years.
MechEng5by5 on November 7, 2008 at 3:31 PM
We need Superstars on our team. Bobby Jendal is a good guy with a future, but what we need is personality. Maybe Ted Nugent and Hank Williams Jr.
I seriously think J.C. Watts has a great personality too. Mitt is still too wooden. Sara Palin is fun, but I’m thinking more of a easy going-smoothy agreeable fellow.
One that can talk right to you through the TV. A charmer with a brain is what we need.
saiga on November 7, 2008 at 3:34 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »