Who will be the token Republican?
posted at 9:50 am on November 6, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Over the last few administrations, presidents have chosen a token appointment to their cabinets in order to put a veneer of bipartisanship on their policies. Ronald Reagan appointed then-Democrat Bill Bennett as Secretary of Education. Bill Clinton gave William Cohen the substantial portfolio of Defense, but only in his second term. George W. Bush had Norman Mineta at Transportation for over five years. Now speculation begins as to whether Barack Obama will appoint a Republican to his Cabinet, and who it might be:
President-elect Barack Obama will reach to the middle and offer more than just-for-show appointments to Republicans in his administration, friends and colleagues predicted Wednesday.
An Obama administration “will be reasonable and logical, not ideological,” Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine told The Washington Times in an interview. “It will be about results, not rhetoric.” Mr. Kaine is a longtime friend of Mr. Obama’s and an early backer who campaigned extensively for the Illinois Democrat and has advised him informally on economic matters.
Mr. Kaine speculated that Mr. Obama would run “a very progressive administration,” but also one that will try to find “pragmatic” solutions to problems.
“Much of it will be centrist, but it will be the smart center, using technology and new ideas and creativity to find common ground,” he said.
One possibility broached before the election was Robert Gates. Obama’s team gave hints that they would like to see Gates continue at Defense, which would keep continuity in the war effort. It could also suggest a great deal more flexibility in Obama’s thinking on Iraq, as Gates replaced Donald Rumsfeld in order to plan and execute the so-called “surge” strategy.
Other than that, though, the possibilities seem limited. In his first appointment, Obama selected a hard-nosed partisan cheap-shot artist as his Chief of Staff. It’s difficult to see Rahm Emanuel playing in the sandbox with Republicans well enough to give many of them a comfort level in joining his team. That appointment sets an unfortunate tone for the future of postpartisanship in the incoming Obama administration.
I’d expect to see no more than two Republicans in the Cabinet, and Gates would likely be one of them. Candidates for other positions would probably be limited to outright “Obamacans” or those hostile to the Bush administration:
- Colin Powell – His endorsement could give him Defense if Gates leaves.
- Chuck Hagel – He’s retiring from the Senate and available; potential Defense or Ag post.
- Michael Bloomberg – Vacillates from Democrat to Republican to independent, but could make a good candidate for Treasury
- Olympia Snowe or Susan Collins – Either would help reduce the Republican contingent in the Senate, as Democrat governor John Baldacci would appoint their replacement. HHS, perhaps?
Don’t expect to see any conservatives on the short list of Republican candidates for appointment, but hey, you already knew that much. When Obama says Republicans, he means Republicans who support Democrats … just as Bush, Clinton, and Reagan defined bipartisanship in their across-the-aisle appointments.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Lugar nixes Obama cabinet question
(for now)
Brat on November 6, 2008 at 9:54 AM
I will believe it when I see it.
flyawaybird on November 6, 2008 at 9:54 AM
Tokens? Just about any Republican will do these days.
Fletch54 on November 6, 2008 at 9:55 AM
Um….John McCain?
seejanemom on November 6, 2008 at 9:55 AM
Who cares? The issue is who will be in leadership in congress, and how well will they stall EVERY item in Obama’s agenda?
Vashta.Nerada on November 6, 2008 at 9:56 AM
McCain?
darwin on November 6, 2008 at 9:56 AM
Chuck Hagel at defense is my guess. Both Collins and Snowe supported McCain pretty strongly, so I think they’re out. Emmanuel will want an Obamacon, not a McCain supporter.
Slublog on November 6, 2008 at 9:56 AM
Take McCain. He is a closet democrat anyway.
volsense on November 6, 2008 at 9:56 AM
TIM KAINE IS A BOOB of monumental proportions..
He has REALLY done a JAM UP job of SCREWING UP our highway system and our Virginia budget…but at least he’s done SOMETHING. More than his boss…
seejanemom on November 6, 2008 at 9:57 AM
Slightly OT, but less so here than on the other thread where I posted.
Serious question.
What happens if a President-elect, or even better, a new sitting President tries to appoint someone to a government post and the appointee fails the needed security clearances? Has it ever happened? Does a new commander-in-chief mean new, different, security levels? Can the President overide the failure to grant security clearances?
riverrat10k on November 6, 2008 at 8:53 AM
Any takers?
riverrat10k on November 6, 2008 at 9:57 AM
Let’s hope it isn’t Hagel . . . the man is as dumb as a rock.
rplat on November 6, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Peggy Noonan?
Ponz on November 6, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Please make Scott McClellan the Press Secreatry.
gumble on November 6, 2008 at 10:00 AM
The big story that will not be told is at the Justice Department. During most administration changes with a different party in power a ton of attorneys from the last party gets the heave-ho. The media made it a big story during the first Bush term and made it look like a new “ominous” sign. I’d be real interested to how gets big and little jobs in there.
hawkdriver on November 6, 2008 at 10:01 AM
I agree.
a capella on November 6, 2008 at 10:01 AM
I’d go with McCain at Defense, if Gates doesn’t stay on. It’s his best issue anyway.
rbj on November 6, 2008 at 10:02 AM
“who” gets
hawkdriver on November 6, 2008 at 10:02 AM
Hegel at Defense – after all, Hegel was an Iraq skeptic and traveled w/ the ObamaMessiah to Iraq on his publicity tour. Noonan, Buckley the son, et al as the main speech writers…
esperpento on November 6, 2008 at 10:02 AM
Chris Matthews = Press Sec and then run for Senate in PA in two years.
hawkdriver on November 6, 2008 at 10:03 AM
Condi Rice is perfect. She’s a she, she’s a minority, she’s pro-abortion, she’s Black, she’s a dem at heart (as her S.of S.resume shows) and she’s avialable!!!
Betcha a dollar!
katy on November 6, 2008 at 10:03 AM
Condi looked like she was creaming in her pantyhose on tv yesterday.
riverrat10k on November 6, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Instead of Tim Kaine how about Jim Gilmore? He’s a Republican, “Snort”. I’m sure he could screw somehting up. He hasn’t disappointed yet. Education, Interior maybe I would say Homeland Security but I hear Ray Nagin has that sewed up./sarc
Oldnuke on November 6, 2008 at 10:05 AM
I’m sure the elctorate supercedes the concerns of a security clearance screener in the DOJ.
hawkdriver on November 6, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Please pick Kathleen Parker as Ambassador to Somalia or Yemen. With no ahem, “staff.”
That would rock.
PimFortuynsGhost on November 6, 2008 at 10:06 AM
If Gates was retained as SecDef 2010 would be in the bag for us because the of al the liberal heads exploding.
We would definitely need a mop and bucket though to clean up the bong-resin laden brain matter.
Mr Snuggle Bunny on November 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Don’t forget Creigh Deeds (the future Democratic nominee for Governor) too. Right in Kaine’s pocket. He needs defeatin’ in 2009.
Abby Adams on November 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM
I think it’s pretty obvious he’s gonna pick Colin Powell. He needs the street cred since he’s really only half black.
YellowDawg on November 6, 2008 at 10:08 AM
I heard O was thinking about Spike Lee.
BuckeyeSam on November 6, 2008 at 10:08 AM
I agree with Slublog. It’s Hagel. Obama is going to want someone a little more sycophantic.
Just a wild guess here but Obama’s cabinet is going to be as feckless if not more so than Bill Clinton’s. The lawyer types get threatened if they aren’t the smartest one in the room.
Iran coulkd not be in a worse position with oil cratering, ridiculous inflation, and an unhappy populace. Iran has to be drooling over John Kerry and the new batch of incentives they are sure to receive.
Theworldisnotenough on November 6, 2008 at 10:08 AM
riverrat10k,
One name; Craig Livingstone
He was Hillary’s thug who was turned down by the Fibs but they were told too bad. The White House makes that call and the pres. is the White House.
thomasaur on November 6, 2008 at 10:08 AM
Exactly!!
katy on November 6, 2008 at 10:09 AM
BTW,
One GREAT positive from Obama winning.
America is no longer racist (except against whites, mexicans and asians). woo hoo!
YellowDawg on November 6, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Yankee White will be granted to anybody Obama designates.
If only the foolish retards who gave over the keys to our country had realized what they were doing.
Its over, man.
seejanemom on November 6, 2008 at 10:10 AM
I thought Nagin was going to head FEMA.
BuckeyeSam on November 6, 2008 at 10:11 AM
He’ll appoint Ted Stevens, then fill in his position with a liberal once the Tubes goes to prison.
MadisonConservative on November 6, 2008 at 10:11 AM
It ain’t going to be the ‘Cuda…
right2bright on November 6, 2008 at 10:11 AM
CHECK. CHECK. CHECKCHECK.
seejanemom on November 6, 2008 at 10:12 AM
You’re kidding right? Barry couldn’t pass a background investigation! Think that will stop him?
rightside on November 6, 2008 at 10:12 AM
I coulda sworn Stevens was a deep cover Lib sent to destroy the GOP.
YellowDawg on November 6, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Ayers is a shoe-in for DHS.
thomasaur on November 6, 2008 at 10:13 AM
True. But skating the razor on utterly distasteful.
***but then, it is ME pointing this out, so um… nevermind***
seejanemom on November 6, 2008 at 10:14 AM
That won’t work, you can’t have a press secretary humping the presidents leg every time they get together.
right2bright on November 6, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Colonel Sanders for White House Chef…
DamnYankee on November 6, 2008 at 10:15 AM
How about Steve Forbes for Treasury secretary?
Dreaming, I know.
playblu on November 6, 2008 at 10:15 AM
I’m guessing Hagel.
crr6 on November 6, 2008 at 10:17 AM
I am dead serious. Maybe naive.
Based on the responses so far, I am now very, very, scared.
Leaving to stock the bunker….now.
riverrat10k on November 6, 2008 at 10:17 AM
If he’s really slick, he’ll offer it to a Republican Senator from a state with a Democratic Governor.
ClintACK on November 6, 2008 at 10:17 AM
Token Republican?
I’ll bet. How about The Red Skull?
dinobalz on November 6, 2008 at 10:17 AM
Their are many layers of security. Just because you are cleared for “Top Secret” in one area, doesn’t mean true for all areas.
You are vetted for specific areas of knowledge. Someone with a Top Secret rating for the middle east political events, doesn’t mean he can walk in and have access to Top Secret military plans, or that he can walk into the Pentagon and request Top Secret info on missile defense.
right2bright on November 6, 2008 at 10:18 AM
DamnYankee,
Raaaaaaaacist
thomasaur on November 6, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Romney gets Secretary of the Treasury as payback for dropping out of the race and leaving republicans stuck with the loser McCain.
fogw on November 6, 2008 at 10:19 AM
How about John McCain? He’s about ast token a republican as you can get and his staff will be delighted to sling mud at the rest of the GOP.
clnurnberg on November 6, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Good call, that would make it 59, and they can always find one liberal Republican that needs a bridge.
right2bright on November 6, 2008 at 10:20 AM
This guy’s head is so far up his corn chute, he can see what he had for lunch yesterday.
whitetop on November 6, 2008 at 10:20 AM
Ya may think I’m a nutter but if O brings any of his old commie buddies to the White House even for
dinner, It will be the nail in the coffin for me in terms of him being a 007 for the Red Star. Why is everyone giving this man so much room and grace concerning his entire past associations. You don’t spend a lifetime reading, writing, mentoring with and associating with communists and then think he does not have these ideals engrained in every fiber of his being. Listen to his words. Watch what he has done and who he knows. MY GOD! We just don’t want to believe it and that will be our downfall.
katy on November 6, 2008 at 10:20 AM
That is the funniest, saddest thing I have read in a long, long time. I will be flabbergasted if even one (non-obama-voting) republican is within 10 miles of this administration.
bilups on November 6, 2008 at 10:22 AM
If he asks Gates to stay on at the Pentagon, I would be very happy about that. We need to stay the course in Iraq and give Gen. Petraeus’ new strategy in Afghanistan time to germinate. Stability at Defense would be very key to successfully concluding operations in both countries.
Come on, Barry. You may have campaigned on changing course in Iraq, but if you actually do, you’ll be the one that goes down in history as the President that lost Iraq, not George W. Bush. President Bush may not have always had the right strategy for winning, but he sure did fix it before he leaves office. I know you don’t want to be that guy.
Since the Cabinet is going to be mostly Dems, has anyone give thought as to which Dems might actually be the best fit for some of these cabinet positions given our current situation? You know, the realist approach?
Red Cloud on November 6, 2008 at 10:22 AM
We just elected a black President. there is no more racism in America
YellowDawg on November 6, 2008 at 10:23 AM
I fully expect a scenario like this to play out.
1. Appointment of a Republican Senator from a state with a Dem governor.
2. A directive to said Senator which is so far out of left field that they either have to voice opposition to the course of action or resign (if they voice opposition, they’re fired).
3. Appointment of another Republican Senator to fill the slot (in the quise of “keeping bipartisanship”).
4. Baby steps to the filibuster-proof dem majority.
The GOP needs to be wary of any appointments of sitting elected officials.
They can have all the out-of-work RINO’s they want as far as I’m concerned, but I think every Republican should oppose any of our Senators moving into an Obama administration.
Jason Coleman on November 6, 2008 at 10:24 AM
Agree about the commies katy.
Sorry about the Condi, thing. It just blogged right out. She looked like she was squirming in her chair.
Back to bunker re-supply mode.
riverrat10k on November 6, 2008 at 10:24 AM
According to this, Lincoln Chaffee would help Obama live up to his claims of bipartisanship!
Pam on November 6, 2008 at 10:25 AM
YellowDawg, my bad
thomasaur on November 6, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Obama will usher in a new era. He will be an historic figure. He will re-define communism as more paletable. Give it a new name. re-package the concept that males it workable within the boundaris of democracy and he will create the global model of utopia. He will be bigger than any figure in humna history.
katy on November 6, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Appoint a Republican? I’ll believe it when I see it. He’s shown no ‘bipartisanship’ in the past, why should he start now?
GarandFan on November 6, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Stinkin’ Lincoln wasn’t even a RINO. He flat out-liberaled a lot of Democrats in his days in the Senate.
Red Cloud on November 6, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Hey, remember the final episode of “West Wing” when President-elect Matt Santos (Jimmy Smits) asked his former “Republican” opponent Alan Alda to serve in his cabinet as Secretary of State? It would be a kumbaya moment for Obama to appoint McCain, huh?
WV736 on November 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM
At least John McCain didn’t endorse Barack Obama. That was Colin Powell.
Looks like McCain will be the pin cushion of idiot disgruntled conservatives for the rest of his life.
wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 10:30 AM
*holding back the puke*
LimeyGeek on November 6, 2008 at 10:30 AM
Obama can prove the irony of ironies as Bush III.
maverick muse on November 6, 2008 at 10:31 AM
It’s ok, I expect that from whiteys :D
YellowDawg on November 6, 2008 at 10:32 AM
This is a ridiculous idea that Snowe would take cabinet post now. Snowe is far too loyal a Republican to even think of resigning the Senate now. I suspect that the same is true for Collins.
thuja on November 6, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Wow, glad to see that denial from Lugar. Obama brought him up so many times during the campaign.
Don’t be surprised to see Colin Pwell as Secretary of Education. Many people do not know that since 1997 he has been chairing America’s Promise, a privately funded non-profit that is promoting improvement in education, prevention of dropouts, better health and nutrition for kids, safe schools and after-school programs, and community service. It’s a great organization.
http://www.americaspromise.org
rockmom on November 6, 2008 at 10:32 AM
How do you use technology to find new ground?
nano-probes?
YellowDawg on November 6, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Condi or Powell, this way there will be one less Uncle Tom on the list that the Dems created.
patrick neid on November 6, 2008 at 10:34 AM
What? You don’t believe he’ll put together a Lincoln-esque Team of Rivals? He said he wanted to!
I have loved Powell in my lifetime, but Obama selects him, the Republicans in the approval hearing need to hammer him about hiding the Armitage/Plame stuff from Bush. No President wants that going on behind his back.
MayBee on November 6, 2008 at 10:35 AM
Meanwhile, Obama will appoint McCain to some position, perhaps even Sec.State (barf) claiming McCain’s foreign experience. Face it, McCain would have been a better commander in chief than Obama. But otherwise, McCain is convoluted as can be on every position, and is NOT a “conservative”.
America supports the conservative movement to counter the radical left. The Republican membership want the leadership purged of “compassionate” saboteurs from Bush, progressive RINOs and self-serving elitists. Secure American founders’ first principles today, the heritage legacy for posterity, and secure the urtext of our Constitution. THAT secures rule of law which enforces Constitutional obligations which the progressive leftists circumvent and dissolve.
McCain will get the axe, having proven himself to be at best a DUD extraordinaire to any Republican effort. JD Hayworth should run for McCain’s senate seat this coming election cycle.
maverick muse on November 6, 2008 at 10:04 AM
maverick muse on November 6, 2008 at 10:35 AM
As a Virginian, I regret the elections of Tim Kaine and B. Hussein Obama to high political office by my fellow Virginians.
Sic Semper Tyrannus
“So always to tyrants” Virginia State Seal with the minor Roman goddes Virtus (virtue) standing on a dead king.
riverrat10k on November 6, 2008 at 10:38 AM
Cabinet appointments have to pass security clearance, but the President doesn’t? Honestly, would Obama gain clearance if he were not president? Anyobody know what the checklist is for this? Would be great to get a hold of it, match it up to Obama’s “career” to date and release it to the media.
AmericanUnderground on November 6, 2008 at 10:40 AM
If the republican count in the senate is reduced, bet heavily on a senator ( Olympia Snow) to be named. Obama and Pelosi do nothing if it doesn’t benefit power acquisition. Oh, and I’ve used small case in the words senate and republican consciously and will continue to do so.
MNDavenotPC on November 6, 2008 at 10:41 AM
The problem is, a large number of the voters weren’t Virginians…..they were NoVA imports.
LimeyGeek on November 6, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Colin Powell
We “might” see a Kmiec nomination for SCOTUS. I know there are those of you who have argued against that, but I’m staying hopeful. He was dean of my law school when I was there and despite his misplaced endorsement, I think he would make a fantastic SC justice. He never had a chance being chosen by Bush, but I think he would have a chance by a Obama.
tmq on November 6, 2008 at 10:47 AM
Somebody wants to get Paid…who isn’t paying their campaign workers? Are they not sitting on like 600 Million dollars?
http://sarah-palin-2008.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-campaign-workers-angry-over.html
Dr Evil on November 6, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Pick Hagel…. Please…
Stay away from the Senate RINO’s… at least until after we re-win Alaska’s senate seat
phreshone on November 6, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Yes, another invasion of my sacred home from the North (starting about 1980. Land and homes were much cheaper here since the Socialist Revolution had not yet come to our State.) I am now waaay OT and will quit :)
riverrat10k on November 6, 2008 at 10:56 AM
I would say John S. McCain but he will be of much more use to them in the Senate if you know what I mean.
Valiant on November 6, 2008 at 11:02 AM
McCain for defense would be a great pick. It is the one area where McCain is conservative. It would send a message that Obama is a centrist. Makes a lot of sense and would make lots of conservatives happy. Which is why it will never happen.
angryed on November 6, 2008 at 11:03 AM
If this is true – When Obama says Republicans, he means Republicans who support Democrats – he could appoint McCain to some position.
katiejane on November 6, 2008 at 11:04 AM
Bloomberg for Treasury!? OMG, no! He is a nut.
PattyJ on November 6, 2008 at 11:06 AM
I’ll get hate for this but look for it to be J.C. Watts. I listened to numerous interviews with the congressman and he was never critical and often overly fawning of BOBO.
thomasaur on November 6, 2008 at 11:06 AM
You just need to remit your user name and password before someone gets hurt. Talk about zero credibility.
John McCain is like a terrorist attack. They are horrible but largely preventable. We had your RINO failure “terrorist attacks” of Ford, Dole, Bush 41. McCain was our 9-11 and like all terrorist attacks, memories fade quickly. Your ilk will be back pushing a GOP nominee who “can win” in 2012 because he will get moderate and independent votes. Go away.
Valiant on November 6, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Carry Condi over
tomas on November 6, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Naive?
NO…PRUDENT, riverrat.
I ***heart*** you rivverat…. and OBTW….AFFIRMATIVE ACTION is over…didn’t you hear?
seejanemom on November 6, 2008 at 11:09 AM
Thanks right2bright. I feel a little bit better now. Not much, though. Will now do my research now and try not to ask any more ignorant questions.
riverrat10k on November 6, 2008 at 11:10 AM
TRU DAT.
You should see the “imports” in NoVA…it is DISGUSTING.
seejanemom on November 6, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Good morning Mr.President. Here is your copy of the daily breifing. Since you have no security clearence please see you copy of “the enquirer”
UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on November 6, 2008 at 11:15 AM
Fixed.
riverrat10k on November 6, 2008 at 11:16 AM
Oh are all those people metioned republicans? I must have gotten them confused I thought they were all democrats
ldbgcoleman on November 6, 2008 at 11:17 AM
UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST,
That was worth a very hearty guffaw.
thomasaur on November 6, 2008 at 11:18 AM
C’mon people, let’s come up with a logical list of most likely appointments based on Bo’s (pbuh) track record. He is most likely to name Dems or Rino, and as such they would have meet The One’s ethical standards.
1. Most importantly, they would have had to have committed a crime of some sort. This will be needed for gravitas with the base. 2. The successful candidate should view the Constitution as nothing more than historical toilet paper. 3. Has to view the rest of the world as smarter and better than us.
I’ll start the list – add to and update.
1. Justice Dept – William Jefferson(D)-LA
2. HUD – Charlie Rangel(D)-NY
3. Treasury Sec’y – Franklin Raines
Sporty1946 on November 6, 2008 at 11:30 AM
Hagel huh! I long suspected him to be a spy in the Republican party.
grapeknutz on November 6, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »