Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Palin on the leaker: A “small, evidently bitter type of person”

posted at 1:41 pm on November 6, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Frum thinks he knows who that small, bitter person is, but the fact that he has his own issues with her colors the assessment. Meanwhile, an important footnote to last night’s fingerpointing speculation: Randy Scheunemann, Palin’s chief loyalist within Team Maverick, apparently was not fired by the campaign for leaking, contrary to CNN’s report yesterday. From today’s Times piece on the “civil war”:

Advisers in the McCain campaign, in suggesting that Palin advisers had been leaking damaging information about the McCain campaign to the news media, said they were particularly suspicious of Randy Scheunemann, Mr. McCain’s top foreign policy aide who had a central role in preparing Ms. Palin for the vice-presidential debate.

As a result, two senior members of the McCain campaign said on Wednesday that Mr. Scheunemann had been fired from the campaign in its final days. But Rick Davis, the McCain campaign manager, and Mr. Salter, one of Mr. McCain’s closest advisers, said Wednesday that Mr. Scheunemann had in fact not been dismissed. Mr. Scheunemann, who picked up the phone in his office at McCain campaign headquarters on Wednesday afternoon, responded that “anybody who says I was fired is either lying or delusional or a whack job.”

More from CNN:

Scheunemann, who was widely viewed as a supporter of former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, admitted people were trying to push him out of the campaign. But he said that [Michael] Goldfarb, his ally, was incorrect when he told CNN that Scheunemann’s blackberry had been taken away — although he does admit that his e-mail account had been “temporarily” cut off.

Michael Goldfarb, a McCain press aide and Scheunemann ally, said that senior McCain aides were mad at Scheunemann — and wanted to fire him — but he insisted they stopped short of that, and instead simply turned off his campaign communication.

Goldfarb said Scheunemann was in the office on Saturday. He was, however, noticeably missing on election night when top aides to John McCain and Sarah Palin gathered in Phoenix, Arizona.

CNN claimed no fewer than three senior McCain advisors as sources for the original story; if you’re inclined to point the finger at Nicolle Wallace and her husband, Mark (who also worked for the campaign), that still leaves one other leaker; Steve Schmidt would be a prime suspect, assuming the rumors about him being sour on Palin are true. Now that the leakers’ story about Scheunemann being canned has been debunked, why doesn’t CNN burn them and out them?

O’Reilly offered the ‘Cuda half an hour on Monday’s Factor today to answer the charges. Judging from what she says below about having nothing to say, I’m guessing he’ll be turned down. Good news, though: If you need your daily Palin fix going forward, the Atlantic’s most famous blogger is promising to stay on the case, doubtless until the shocking true story of Trig’s matrilineage can finally be told.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

Nicole Wallace is a coward.
I hope she never works again.

But I’m sure she’ll just go back to CBS or some other lib media outlet and become the “conservative Republican” on display for the edification of the LIBS.

ExTex on November 6, 2008 at 2:11 PM

Wallace
Wallace
and Schmidt

Even if these folks are not the leakers, can we agree that we will turn on any future state or national GOP campaign that hires them just because of the miserable campaign they ran this year.

That being said, I’m totally convinced it’s Nicolle Wallace.

CanadianGuy on November 6, 2008 at 2:11 PM

McCain and his camp barely knew about Palin and it showed during the campaign.

What, they didn’t know her sizes? They didn’t know that she didn’t do anything wrong even though her former brother-in-law was a monumental screwup? They didn’t know what she doesn’t have a psychic link to Google in case of ambush interviews? Please elucidate, my politically adept friend.

Jim Treacher on November 6, 2008 at 2:11 PM

With all this sniping from supposed advisors, no wonder Sarah didn’t use them for interview prep. If this is what a McCain presidency would have been like, the next four years won’t be so bad after all.

pedestrian on November 6, 2008 at 2:11 PM

Simply a case of losers trying to blame Palin for their craptacular campaign.

CDeb on November 6, 2008 at 2:11 PM

LOL,…she’s good! The media hates when you wont give some dirt back. MSM wants to take Gov Palin down before 2012 because they have to live with the shock of knowing NOTHING about obama…I mean come on,they have to do something, obama wont let them in the door.

christene on November 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM

I’m not sure she will be the nominee in 2012. How often is it that people reliably predict the nominee 4 years before (other than an incumbent, or course)? Did we think Dole? GWB? McCain? Anyone remember George Allen? Heck, Phil Gramm?

Having said that, I do think she will be a power player in the GOP if she wants. I guess we’ll see.

SAZMD on November 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM

Oh ya.

26 hours and counting since these leaks first came out and not a peep from McCain or anyone associated with the campaign.

CanadianGuy on November 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM

That’s “Suntanned Lord,” to you, Y-Not.

Grow Fins on November 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM

Jindal is too young (and nerdy)to be prez yet(41 in 2012) but a perfect VP for Palin.

Firebird on November 6, 2008 at 2:03 PM

Jindal is a prodigy. Age will not be an issue. He has served in Congress, run a large federal government agency, and in 2012 will be in his second term as a wildly popular governor of a major state. And he may be the smartest person in politics, yet he also has the common touch. He is the son of immigrants. He is a Catholic.

I would not even mind a Palin vs. Jindal primary in 2012. Whoever wins takes the other as VP.

rockmom on November 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM

OT: I think Rev Wright is speaking tonight…

Firebird on November 6, 2008 at 2:13 PM

Jim Treacher on November 6, 2008 at 2:03 PM

Jim T.,
I sent McCain an email, per your suggestion.
Good blog, btw.
Cheers.

Dear Senator McCain,
Thank you for running with Governor Palin for the leadership of our country. I appreciate your efforts, and that of your terrific wife, Cindy, these past months.
I proudly cast my vote for you on November 4th.
I was also a donor to your campaign. Although I was a larger donor to Fred Thompson in the primary, I was pleased to support you in the general election. I did so after you selected Governor Palin as your running mate.
Knowing how important honor and civility are to you, and watching you try to lead us all by example by not criticizing your Democratic opponents with personal attacks, I am surprised and disappointed that you have not come out publicly to reprimand the anonymous staffers from your campaign who are attacking your running mate.
I think it would send an important message to the country, particularly to the members of your party, if you were to make a very strong statement in defense of Governor Palin.
You have served this country admirably well for decades, but Gov. Palin represents the future of this party.
Respectfully yours,
XXXXX X. XXXXX, Ph.D.
XXXXXX, CA

Y-not on November 6, 2008 at 2:14 PM

Anyone remember George Allen?

there’s a reason George Allen wasn’t the nominee this year…its because of pricks in the MSM/DNC sent out to destroy him pre-emptively. Exactly what is going on now with Palin.

any true Reagan conservative is to be destroyed. That is the MO of the MSM/DNC

jp on November 6, 2008 at 2:14 PM

Aurvant on November 6, 2008 at 2:09 PM

The reference to Africa is even more out-of-context than that. Frum implies that a reference was made to souther Africa and she mistakenly took it that the person meant South Africa, which IS a country. This is apparently the root of the statement that she didn’t understand Africa is a continent not a country. This is a case of an understandable miscommunication being used in a dirty way.

Hawthorne on November 6, 2008 at 2:14 PM

OT: I think Rev Wright is speaking tonight…

Firebird on November 6, 2008 at 2:13 PM

AMERIKKKA’S CHICKENNNNNNNNNSSSSS have come HOMMMMMMMMMME to ROOOOOOOOOSSSSST!!!

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 6, 2008 at 2:15 PM

I must admit, on a few occasions, I’ve misspoke and said Africa was a “country” instead of a “continent”?

Now that you mention it, I wonder if this stunning(ly vague) revelation will mean that “African-American” is no longer specific enough. Will we need to break it down by country?

Jim Treacher on November 6, 2008 at 2:15 PM

How would a George Allen Sarah Palin ticket have played this year if Macacca had never happened?

would we have won or got killed?

jp on November 6, 2008 at 2:15 PM

All of you retards who were blaming Romney and his supporters for this crap can come out now and apologize. You apologize and I’ll take back the “retards” comment. Fair enough?

cjs1943 on November 6, 2008 at 2:15 PM

rockmom on November 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM

I think that would be a great ticket, I just don’t know if Jindal by himself can defeat BO.

Firebird on November 6, 2008 at 2:16 PM

I have nothing but good things to say about Sarah, God bless her and her family.

mindhacker on November 6, 2008 at 2:16 PM

The one thing you can say that the republicans do better than any other group and they have gotten better at it over time is eat their own

KBird on November 6, 2008 at 2:16 PM

OT: I think Rev Wright is speaking tonight…

Firebird on November 6, 2008 at 2:13 PM

I thought he would be prepped for his confirmation hearings as Sec State.

pedestrian on November 6, 2008 at 2:16 PM

OT, but ROTFLMAO:

http://www.wthr.com/global/story.asp?s=9299280

Indianapolis – Lines were long and tempers flared Wednesday not to vote but to get paid for canvassing for Barack Obama. Several hundred people are still waiting to get their pay for last-minute campaigning. Police were called to the Obama campaign office on North Meridian Street downtown to control the crowd.

The line was long and the crowd was angry at times.

“I want my money today! It’s my money. I want it right now!” yelled one former campaign worker.

capitalist piglet on November 6, 2008 at 2:17 PM

That’s “Suntanned Lord,” to you, Y-Not.

Grow Fins on November 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM

Wow. Just wow. Can you kiss up any more?? I don’t think there’s much room left.

*retches*

Grue in the Attic on November 6, 2008 at 2:17 PM

Rev Wright beat out Rick Warren as the nation’s “go to” Pastor…Pastor Rick was asked to comment but couldn’t be distracted from eating a tub of ice-cream…

Nozzle on November 6, 2008 at 2:17 PM

Palin responding directly to the Africa absurdity would be a classic “I’m not a bimbo!” error. If and when anyone asks her about it directly, she should laugh it off before going in for the kill on rats and sinking ships. Most likely there’s some kernel of truth to the story that’s been blown up into an an absurdity – some minor exchange or slip of the tongue similar to Obama’s 57 states, and unlikely as bad as his holocaustic tornado or Biden’s reference to Roosevelt’s imaginary TV appearance. You can remain a hardcore fan of Palin – like, um, me – and still acknowledge that she showed a tendency to stumble verbally during early high-pressure, unexpectedly hostile exchanges. If she wants it in 2012, she should be reciting whole passages from FOREIGN AFFAIRS in Spanish by then.

CK MacLeod on November 6, 2008 at 2:18 PM

It’s almost as if someone is trying to keep the loyal opposition pre-occupied tearing itself apart. Almost…

/

Christien on November 6, 2008 at 2:18 PM

Hawthorne on November 6, 2008 at 2:14 PM

Agreed. It seems to me that the McCain staffers are trying to throw anything against the wall about Palin and hope it sticks. Looks like Palin stole their thunder and they’re gonna try and knock her down a peg.

Aurvant on November 6, 2008 at 2:18 PM

I can’t wait to see the rest of Bambi’s circus troup…This will provide entertainment for at least four years…

Nozzle on November 6, 2008 at 2:19 PM

This is so ridiculous and petty. If McCain aides and Palin aides have a beef with each other, let them hash it out behind closed doors, without the MSM listening!

For now, Sarah Palin should go back to running Alaska, then persuade Senator Stevens to resign once the absentee ballots have come in, then appoint a worthy successor, who could run again in 2010 while Palin runs for re-election as Governor.

She should otherwise keep a low profile until the Obama administration gets started, and if Obama starts governing hard-left, or sitting down with Ahmadinejad or Chavez, she can start doing interviews with the MSM saying–”I told you this during the campaign, but not enough voters believed me”, and she would be on her way.

Whatever idiot thought that Palin didn’t know the countries in the NAFTA agreement should definitely be fired, and exiled to Mexico. Sarah Palin, as Governor of Alaska, oversaw the negotiations of a $40 billion gas pipeline from Alaska through Canada to the lower 48. She probably had to read all the details of the NAFTA agreement to ensure that her negotiations with the Canadian government satisfied it, and probably knew it inside-out and backwards!

Sarah Palin is one misunderestimated lady! She’ll be back–not so sure about McCain, although he’ll probably have a Senate seat for life.

Steve Z on November 6, 2008 at 2:19 PM

“I want my money today! It’s my money. I want it right now!” yelled one former campaign worker.
capitalist piglet on November 6, 2008 at 2:17 PM

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!

AAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAH!!!

Get used to it, buddy!! You’re going to be saying that for the next four long years!!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!

The schadenfreude is so thick you could spoon-feed it.

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 6, 2008 at 2:20 PM

All of you anti-Palin people, are so easy to manipulate.
The MSM want Palin out of the picture, she devastated them, and they know she will be stronger in 4 years. Time enough to build a viable powerful women action group, along with a conservative group.
So they throw out a few bones, and you swoop down and pick off the meat…you were so easy to manipulate, so very easy…

right2bright on November 6, 2008 at 2:21 PM

there’s a reason George Allen wasn’t the nominee this year…its because of pricks in the MSM/DNC sent out to destroy him pre-emptively. Exactly what is going on now with Palin.

jp on November 6, 2008 at 2:14 PM

Exactly. Which is why I’m not as hopeful that she will be the nominee in 2012. She might not even run if this gets bad enough. It doesn’t matter what is true, only what people believe. And there are too many rubes out there for this stuff to not stick. I can’t express in words how sick all of this makes me feel. Unfair doesn’t even begin to describe it.

SAZMD on November 6, 2008 at 2:21 PM

Palin is electric, dynamic and forges the Reagan alliance on the 3 core issues. That is why they fear her, and they want to drive wedges between the factions of the GOP as they have been for years now.

jp on November 6, 2008 at 1:52 PM

Inflation, Jobs and the Soviet menace? Seeing as how those were the issues that got Ronaldus Maximus elected twice. Once for promising to fix the economy and take the commies down a peg or two. The second time for actually doing it.

Do not compare Palin with Reagan. She is nowhere near his level. Leaders like RWR come along once in a generation. Palin ain’t that leader.

Krydor on November 6, 2008 at 2:21 PM

That’s “Suntanned Lord Adonis,” to you, Y-Not.

Grow Fins on November 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM

fify

Y-not on November 6, 2008 at 2:21 PM

“daily fix” huh? That kind of language smacks of junkies and pushers!

/

Christien on November 6, 2008 at 2:22 PM

I’m not sure she will be the nominee in 2012. How often is it that people reliably predict the nominee 4 years before (other than an incumbent, or course)? Did we think …GWB? …

SAZMD on November 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM

I knew after he won the governorship in TX in 94, that the WH was next

ConservativePartyNow on November 6, 2008 at 2:22 PM

McCain has NO HONOR if he doesn’t come out IMMEDIATELY and dispell these rumors!

Pick up the phone in Sedona and call Carl Cameron and set this smugf#ck straight.

Sarah almost saved his sorry-a$$ campaign and THIS is the thanks she gets.

If not for Sarah, Barry would have won by 10+million votes and the electoral college would have been 400+ for “Thee Urkel”.

omnipotent on November 6, 2008 at 2:22 PM

the Atlantic’s most famous blogger is promising to stay on the case, doubtless until the shocking true story of Trig’s matrilineage can finally be told.

Hmm… I thing Andrew Sullivan is looking in the wrong places.

Blake on November 6, 2008 at 2:22 PM

The one thing you can say that the republicans do better than any other group and they have gotten better at it over time is eat their own

KBird on November 6, 2008 at 2:16 PM

They also are very good at losing graciously. Have you see all the Repub pundits today congratulating other Repubs on how graciously they lose?

Bush
McCain
Blunt

BigD on November 6, 2008 at 2:22 PM

there’s a reason George Allen wasn’t the nominee this year…its because of pricks in the MSM/DNC sent out to destroy him pre-emptively. Exactly what is going on now with Palin.

any true Reagan conservative is to be destroyed. That is the MO of the MSM/DNC

jp on November 6, 2008 at 2:14 PM

So, why exactly can’t we return the favor? I’d be interested in hearing any ideas that would destroy the msm (I refuse to capitalize this acronym any longer). If the msm is useless, then lets get rid of them.

CantCureStupid on November 6, 2008 at 2:22 PM

seems to me that anyone that is capable of being a true Reagan Conservative leader has one big Target on their head by the Dems and the MSM, they do not want to ever have another Reagan.

Newt, Allen, Palin….etc.

something has to be figure out here, with MSM

jp on November 6, 2008 at 2:25 PM

Except it wasn’t “Big S” – McCain wouldn’t have pulled 55M without her. You seem to think quite highly of your political acumen. Who, pray tell, were you backing for Veep? Early response: Nobody cares.

rhodeymark on November 6, 2008 at 2:04 PM

Hey, I warned early on (before she was picked, fwiw) that whe would be a disaster, for all the reasons we now see. She scared away moderates, was plagued by scandals, and does not appear ready for high office. Yes, she was bound to energize the right wing of the Republican party based on her social views and religious approach to governing – but there were never enough votes there to win a national election. It was plain to see from outside of the conservative bubble that this was going to happen. Don’t blame me because I was right.

Big S on November 6, 2008 at 2:25 PM

So, Sarah said she’s coming to Washington to shake up the good ol’ boy network… and the cronies respond by acting precisely like good ol’ boys do: hanging a “No Girls” sign on the GOP clubhouse? Geez, I’m about ready to grab her, Newt, and a couple of other keepers, and start our own third party!

VastRightWingConspirator on November 6, 2008 at 2:26 PM

Now that you mention it, I wonder if this stunning(ly vague) revelation will mean that “African-American” is no longer specific enough. Will we need to break it down by country?

Why not? Canadians don’t want to be associated as “North Americans? even though they are for more “Northier” than we Americans of the USA. Mexicans wouldn’t like being called “Central Americans” and you cant just go around calling Brazilians or Peruvians, South Americans.

If someone is going to hammer on Palin for not being specific enough or being falsely specific then why not have everyone else start being overly specific about what origin they claim?

I for one am offended that I am not referred to as an Irish-Scottish-Native American. I demand justice and proper labels. :P

Aurvant on November 6, 2008 at 2:26 PM

CK MacLeod on November 6, 2008 at 2:18 PM

Don’t know NAFTA…Obama saying he will meet with the president of Canada when discussing NAFTA.
Don’t know NAFTA is a continent…Obama stating there were 57 states, and something like 10,000 people killed in some minor disaster
Palin doesn’t know the Bush Doctrine….Krauthammer, who coined the phrase, didn’t understand the question either.
Palin and her wardrobe…Cindy wears more around her neck (her two diamond pins are worth more then that), Michelle has a personal clothing designer.
Palin is a threat, and they are digging deep to find the most insignificant items…I am a conservative, I won’t fall for it…

right2bright on November 6, 2008 at 2:26 PM

Most likely there’s some kernel of truth to the story that’s been blown up into an absurdity – some minor exchange or slip of the tongue similar to Obama’s 57 states, and unlikely as bad as his holocaustic tornado or Biden’s reference to Roosevelt’s imaginary TV appearance.

CK MacLeod on November 6, 2008 at 2:18 PM

This is almost certainly the truth. Too bad the haters or even the doubters don’t care to listen. Just goes to show how powerful the MSM is in creating a narrative that even some conservative minded people would buy it hook, line and sinker.

SAZMD on November 6, 2008 at 2:27 PM

Not NAFTA as a continent, Africa…God how easy is it to make an error.

right2bright on November 6, 2008 at 2:27 PM

Maybe these RINO yutzes are getting paid by Barry to keep everybody occupied while he prepares for his ascension.

That’s probably why the workers aren’t getting paid. Or maybe Soros hasn’t written that check yet.

Dow down 362 now. Biggest sell-off ever after an election. This should give you a clue as to what we are in for.

Howdy, Drywall! How’s the superior intellect today?

Great to see everybody else here today.

Grue, tell Manly next time you e-mail him, that we miss his optimism. Especially this Newbie

kingsjester on November 6, 2008 at 2:27 PM

Geez, I’m about ready to grab her, Newt, and a couple of other keepers, and start our own third party!

VastRightWingConspirator on November 6, 2008 at 2:26 PM

If such a party stood a chance…

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 6, 2008 at 2:28 PM

I lament the choice of Palin! She didn’t go on O’Reilly! (I hope she doesn’t now, time to move on). If only Pawlenty had been picked, or Charlie Crist, McCain might have lost with a larger margin!

What the ticket really needed wasn’t someone to rally the base, we needed a second McCain on the ticket. No, I know you are thinking, she was a second McCain – a reformer, a maverick, no, we needed a second McCain who undermined the base!

If only, if only! If we had that, we wouldn’t argue about what went wrong, because McCain never would have been close!

Spirit of 1776 on November 6, 2008 at 2:28 PM

Grue, tell Manly next time you e-mail him, that we miss his optimism. Especially this Newbie

kingsjester on November 6, 2008 at 2:27 PM

Hahahah, will do!

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 6, 2008 at 2:28 PM

that even some conservative WEAK minded people would buy it hook, line and sinker.

SAZMD on November 6, 2008 at 2:27 PM

Added a little word…

right2bright on November 6, 2008 at 2:28 PM

Inflation, Jobs and the Soviet menace? Seeing as how those were the issues that got Ronaldus Maximus elected twice. Once for promising to fix the economy and take the commies down a peg or two. The second time for actually doing it.

Do not compare Palin with Reagan. She is nowhere near his level. Leaders like RWR come along once in a generation. Palin ain’t that leader.

Krydor on November 6, 2008 at 2:21 PM

Reagan = Social Conservative Christian values leader
Reagan = Fiscal Libertarian Conservative, limited Govt., etc.
Reagan = Foreign Policy hawk

thats the 3 stools of the Reagan alliance, its exactly what Romney recognized and tried to make himself into. Problem for him is its not authentic.

Palin has the other special gift, atleast I think, that Reagan had as did Clinton and Obama. Likeability and the ability to get peoples attention and communicate to them. Take the 3 legs of Reagan Conservatism and add that and you have something special.

jp on November 6, 2008 at 2:29 PM

With this s-storm that has been raging over this it is interesting to see who comes out in public and defends Palin and who doesn’t. I can’t listen to his show in my area but did Hewitt say anything about this yesterday? I haven’t seen any posts on his site yet about this. Remember his constant refrain from the primaries, regardless of the then state of affairs. “You know who this helps?…” He had his post-mortem show yesterday and I would think that Palin would have been a topic.

I don’t say this to dump on him in particular. It’s just interesting to see where people are coming down on the whole issue of Sarah. I know I will remember who attempted to hurt her and who defended her next election season.

BrianBoru on November 6, 2008 at 2:29 PM

Yeah, I think we should throw overboard all the conservative Palin fans.
/

If you want to be buoyed with hope, go read the tributes here. Aside from a couple nitwit’s comments sprinkled through, it’ll give you hope. Sarah is not going to slip quietly into the night without a fight.

hoosiermama on November 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM

Steve Z on November 6, 2008 at 2:19 PM

It actually looks like the two most vocal people are the Wallaces. They were directly given responsibility for preparing Sarah Palin for facing the press. Nicolle Wallace and her husband are the ones directly responsible for arranging the interviews with Gibson and Couric. They screwed up.

They should have started her with safer interviews with Britt Hume, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity etc until she got her feet under her. It would have delayed the criticism about her not doing interviews. Choosing Gibson and Couric first was just idiotic.

This entire situation smacks of people trying to deflect blame for their own mismanagement in order to salvage their own political credentials. The Wallaces failed miserably in their handling of Plain and they are to blame for the fallout. But they are trying hard to make Palin look like the one who is to blame.

Hawthorne on November 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM

I always check the “other” box an applications and such and write in:

Euro-American

riverrat10k on November 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM

So, why exactly can’t we return the favor? I’d be interested in hearing any ideas that would destroy the msm (I refuse to capitalize this acronym any longer). If the msm is useless, then lets get rid of them.

CantCureStupid on November 6, 2008 at 2:22 PM

I think we are at point we have to get dirty with them, as Ace and others have suggested. Start Vetting the media, maybe completely boycott NBC.

They are the prime reason bush is as unpopular as he is. Don’t forget Rathergate either combined with how they got Obama elected, smeared Palin and turned on a dime on McCain.

Enough Americans realize it, time to make a stand against the MSM

jp on November 6, 2008 at 2:31 PM

I think Bozell and company need to launch a Cable TV Channel that is a Media Watchdog news station. Run reports everyday on Media bias, run it 24 hours a day like CNN Headline News.

jp on November 6, 2008 at 2:33 PM

Jindal is a prodigy. Age will not be an issue. He has served in Congress, run a large federal government agency, and in 2012 will be in his second term as a wildly popular governor of a major state. And he may be the smartest person in politics, yet he also has the common touch. He is the son of immigrants. He is a Catholic.

I would not even mind a Palin vs. Jindal primary in 2012. Whoever wins takes the other as VP

I second that one. Both Jindal and Palin will be second-term Governors by 2012, and if Jindal can really clean up Louisiana in the meantime, he will be considered a rising star, and Jindal and Palin could eventually campaign together during the primaries, and Palin would have four years to get “up to speed” on foreign-policy issues. Besides, if Obama screws up badly (as is very likely) on either economic or foreign policy issues, Jindal/Palin will seem wise by comparison, Bush will have been forgotten, and Jindal’s Indian ancestry will help trump Obama’s black ancestry as an ethnic issue.

Jindal and Palin have also worked together. When Hurricane Gustav was bearing down on Louisiana, Palin sent troops and equipment from the Alaska National Guard to help rescue efforts. No bull, just one Governor helping another, get ‘er done!

Steve Z on November 6, 2008 at 2:33 PM

Palin has such grace!

maverick muse on November 6, 2008 at 2:35 PM

Choosing Gibson and Couric first was just idiotic

Not only that. Gibson had two whole days with Palin. Couric had so much footage that she rolled it out over two weeks. And to make it worse, while Couric aired her the bad interviews, they had her sequestered so that the only footage of her talking that day was from the Couric interview.

Idiots! Leakers or not, these people should be like Fredo Corleone to the GOP.

CanadianGuy on November 6, 2008 at 2:35 PM

Carl Cameron sucks.

maverick muse on November 6, 2008 at 2:35 PM

As much as I hate to say it, she has a major uphill climb for 2010. The MSM attacks have poisoned a great percentage of the country, and it was done so in the most polarizing way. She needs to show that she has the ability to lead, and do so in a way that even the MSM can’t deny.

She has to hold AK above water in the upcoming economy, and if she can hold AK well above the US average it is at least a slight positive. She also needs to continue connecting with voters from the lower 48 and do so while proving that she isn’t the stereotype that is put forth. Maybe Op-Eds or interviews.

It would be nice if all of the BS from this campaign could be debunked in one central location that would allow people to see the real Palin, but I am very hesitant over how much people have put into the mud-slinging media. And this is coming from a youth who voted for Palin, not McCain (although I would have voted against Obama)

aacid on November 6, 2008 at 2:35 PM

Wallace
Wallace
and Schmidt

SCREW THEM!

NRA Lifer on November 6, 2008 at 2:35 PM

Added to the “Thank you, Sarah Palin” petition on the bosses blog:

I had the privilege of visiting your great State several years ago. Hopefully, I’ll be able to afford to do so again after the coming fiscal carnage has finally subsided. You were the only point of light in the long, dreary election cycle of 2007-08. I hope you will continue to let us hear from you. God bless you, Madam Governor.

taselba on November 6, 2008 at 2:37 PM

McCain’s campaign would not have won him a seat on the 7th grade of Wasilla Middle School student council, let alone the Presidency of the United States.

(1) When McCain had the chance to make a stand on the bailout, he cowered and accepted the neocon line of thinking by voting for the bailout that was “loaded with goodies.”

(2) McCain’s campaign became infiltrated with neoconservative Bushites who really aren’t skilled in campaign management. There was no theme except attacking Obama and not giving people a reason to vote McCain other than “country first.”

(3) As far as country first is concerned, how can you be country first when you are constantly throwing the VP under the bus and mismanaging her. Palin should not have been force-fed neocon talking points on foreign policy and should have been given a greater voice on energy, economics, and domestic issues. McCain’s weakness in the economy could have been disguised had these idiots utilized Palin more to do economic stump speeches and less of the security/palling with terrorist speeches that were being used.

(4) Palin didn’t lose the campaign as near 90% of the GOP voted for McCain…I guess the meme that Palin was a negative can be canceled out. This election was lost on the economy and McCain’s camp effectively cost themselves the election the second he voted for the bailout as it removed a potential issue that he could have railed against for four weeks.

I never want to see Rick Davis, Tucker Bounds, or Steve Schmidt near a GOP campaign ever again.

Dickie Dunn on November 6, 2008 at 2:39 PM

Big S: “religious approach to governing”

I just don’t see how that is fair, but you’re certainly entitled to it. I am comfortable with her Alaska record, and think some common sense is being lost in this debate.

rhodeymark on November 6, 2008 at 2:40 PM

McCain has NO HONOR if he doesn’t come out IMMEDIATELY and dispell these rumors!
omnipotent on November 6, 2008 at 2:22 PM

The press is reporting that some one in the McCain camp said this. What the hell is McCain supposed to do? He’s defended her for two months. He isn’t accused of this, it’s the moronic idiot staffer who is a disgruntled a*hole who is making this, not McCain. And the campaign is over. McCain has no idea who this person is, if he’s making this crap up now. McCain has nothing to do with this, and his going back to his house in Arizona and leaving the campaign and the press for 24 hours after the defeat is not any sort of support in abstention of agreeing with the claims that this ‘unnamed sourced’ turd is making.

In other words: McCain HAS ALWAYS SUPPORTED PALIN AND ISN’T MAKING ANY CLAIMS ABOUT THIS AT ALL.

Do you understand?

wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 2:41 PM

Nichole Wallace would muck it up at the bar telling tall tales to make herself look important, intelligent, ‘SMART’assed alongside her matching rumor mongering douche bag Carl Cameron. He eats her shit and calls it cuisine and forces it on us.

No way. Take it back!

maverick muse on November 6, 2008 at 2:42 PM

All of you retards who were blaming Romney and his supporters for this crap can come out now and apologize. You apologize and I’ll take back the “retards” comment. Fair enough?

cjs1943 on November 6, 2008 at 2:15 PM

If an apology has to be conditional, you can cram it. Conditional apologies are not sincere, and as such, should be completely disregared.

ICBM on November 6, 2008 at 2:43 PM

wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 2:41 PM

McCain should open up his fat head and say “These rumors are lies by petty losers that I mistakenly associated myself with.”

How effin’ hard is that?

omnipotent on November 6, 2008 at 2:43 PM

You know, DD – I agree with your take. I was comfortable with McCains decision to return to Washington – it certainly is what I would have done, but they really really mishandled that episode. Epic fail, even if McCain did stand up for the House, which was the right thing to do.

rhodeymark on November 6, 2008 at 2:44 PM

Remember Obama and the MSM are orchestrating all of this. The McCain staffers are only tools to be used by them to thwart Sarah’s chances in 2012.

technopeasant on November 6, 2008 at 2:44 PM

Now that you mention it, I wonder if this stunning(ly vague) revelation will mean that “African-American” is no longer specific enough. Will we need to break it down by country?

McCain is white. Obama is black.

Please, people, I’m all for addressing people as they see fit, but, come on, Frank Bruno is black and the black Mike Tyson kicked his black ass. I say “black” because Bruno is British. What, he’s an “african-great-britain”?

Can we kick PC to the curb, now? PLEASE?

rjwest21 on November 6, 2008 at 2:44 PM

McCain has no idea who this person is, if he’s making this crap up now.

You’re right.
But, I’m sure Sarah Palin knows who was in the room when she came in wearing a bathrobe. Thus, she knows.

rjwest21 on November 6, 2008 at 2:46 PM

In other words: McCain HAS ALWAYS SUPPORTED PALIN AND ISN’T MAKING ANY CLAIMS ABOUT THIS AT ALL.

wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 2:41 PM

McCain stood up for Obama against the North Carolina GOP when they put out an ad pointing out Jeremiah Wright.

He has not yet stood up for Palin against attacks from his own staffers and party.

That is your candidate, pal.

MadisonConservative on November 6, 2008 at 2:48 PM

Sarah Palin is one misunderestimated lady! She’ll be back–not so sure about McCain, although he’ll probably have a Senate seat for life.

Steve Z on November 6, 2008 at 2:19 PM

Glad we got McCain out of the way. I doubt he’ll try again and it was good that he honorably sacrificed himself on the alter of Obama (not that he saw it that way). Now we can move on.

I hope he doesn’t run again for Senate to make room for someone else more conservative. Arizona is turning Dem and we need someone to stop the bleeding. I would like to see Jeff Flake run but I hear he falls on the liberal side of immigration (fact check needed).

Mr_Magoo on November 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM

McCain’s returning to Washington was the right move. It was the drama of suspending the campaign and then being perceived as ineffectual to the outcome that killed him. He should have returned to DC while planning to have the debate either way, and he should have run against the bailout while offering up his own plan that he would have thought was better. Heck, I believe that he even could have eventually voted for the plan after all of that and it would not have hurt him.

Notice none of this had to do with Sarah Palin.

SAZMD on November 6, 2008 at 2:51 PM

That is your candidate, pal.
MadisonConservative on November 6, 2008 at 2:48 PM

Hey MADISONconservative, how do YOUR CANDIATE do? Did BOB BARR win the election? No? Did he get 60% of the vote? No? Did he get 50% of the vote? No? No? Did he get 40% of the vote? No? Did he get 30% of the vote? No? No? Did he get 20% of the vote? No? Did he get 10% of the vote? No?

wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 2:51 PM

Seriously. I’ve been home with the carpet cleaners ALL day- this Palin smear is all over the radio and TV; Where is McCain speaking out against it? Is it possible that he’s cool with it? I know he’s off with his pal Lindsey Shamnesty Graham, licking his wounds, but this is ridiculous. I think his future reputation is very much at stake.

anniekc on November 6, 2008 at 2:51 PM

McCain came out against the North Carolina state GOP when it ran a Rev. Wright ad faster than he is coming to Sarah’s aid now.

Ol’ boy is being quite the pussy now.

omnipotent on November 6, 2008 at 2:52 PM

omnipotent on November 6, 2008 at 2:43 PM

Rumors are not true if people don’t comment on them.

wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 2:52 PM

If not for the MSM, Bush would be around 50% approval. If he was a Democrat he’d be known as a great liberator and terrorist butt kicker who had kept us safe heroicaly since 9/11. He’d have very high approvals right now….if he was a Democrat/Liberal and did what he did.

jp on November 6, 2008 at 2:05 PM

Thank you. The real core of the problem. Obama ran against George W. Bush, not John McCain, not Sarah Palin. That only worked because a bunch of lying “journalists” spent 8 years smearing President Bush at every opportunity. They hunted high and low for a scandal, but “Chimpy” was apparently smarter than all of them put together, because they were never able to find one. They settled for accusing him of “lying us into a war” and the natural disaster of Katrina.

Not that Bush escapes blame. He failed to defend himself, just ignoring the constant attacks, until his approval rating was only twice as high as Congress. He didn’t care about his own low approval rating, but he should have cared for the sake of the country.

McCain wanted to distance himself from Bush, but Obama wouldn’t let him. He should have done a little political jiu jitsu and started defending the Bush policies where they were obviously popular and sensible. And he should have nailed him over and over again on wanting to raise taxes on anybody in an economic recession. He should have also turned the tables and run against Obama as a reincarnation of Jimmy Carter, who had the worst economic record of any president in recent memory. If he had asked people if they were comfortable with double-digit inflation and unemployment, Obama might have looked a little riskier.

tom on November 6, 2008 at 2:52 PM

Ol’ boy is being quite the pussy now.

omnipotent on November 6, 2008 at 2:52 PM

and you are being an asshole now.

wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 2:53 PM

Hey MADISONconservative, how do YOUR CANDIATE do?

wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 2:51 PM

I voted for McCain, not Barr, you worthless, lying little sack of dog vomit.

Face the fact that the guy you told other people to stop telling the truth about, the guy you told others to just shut up and vote for, the guy who was a terrible candidate, loathes conservatives, showed it numerous times, and is simply taking out his petty little aggression one last time before his career starts towards the finish line.

MadisonConservative on November 6, 2008 at 2:54 PM

But, I’m sure Sarah Palin knows who was in the room when she came in wearing a bathrobe. Thus, she knows.

rjwest21 on November 6, 2008 at 2:46 PM

Can someone please explain to me why this story matters? It is not like she strutted out naked or in her latest Victoria Secret. She got out of the shower, was wearing a towel or bathrobe and a towel on her head, and said she would be just a minute. Who cares?

SAZMD on November 6, 2008 at 2:54 PM

wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 2:51 PM

Oh, and remember how you used to accuse me of being an Obama supporter because I pointed out the bad things about McCain?

How come you’ll defend a guy who backs up Barack Obama against attacks, but not back up his own Vice Presidential candidate now that she’s no longer an asset to him?

MadisonConservative on November 6, 2008 at 2:55 PM

I also signed the petition. it is at

Thank You, Sarah Palin!

Hawthorne on November 6, 2008 at 2:56 PM

jp on November 6, 2008 at 2:29 PM

Here’s the thing with Reagan: he would NEVER have been so hellishly unprepared when in the public eye in front of a hostile media. Never, ever, ever. The media hated him, the public loved him.

Behind his folksy “aw shucks” public persona was a man of morals, dignity and keen intelligence. He saved California and used that formula to save the USA. He never, in my recollection, played the God card, called his political opponents “unamerican” or anything of the sort.

In his final address, he implored the generation coming up to learn their history, learn what it was to be an American. He was proud of his administrations contributions to science, for heaven’s sake. Palin has no idea what science is and mocks it.

As much as the Gipper energized the religious wing (whilst doing precisely zero for it) he energized the entire country. Hell, he changed the freaking world. Eastern Europe still loves the man.

Palin isn’t fit to walk in his shadow. Her lack of preparation for Couric is evidence enough that she is unfit. Good lord, Reagan would have mopped the floor with any of the actual newspeople of his day. Couric is just a creation with no substance. She lost a battle of wits to a sham news anchor more suited to talking about the latest Christmas toys.

That’s your saviour? Hardly. Find someone who doesn’t wear the bible on their sleeve, likes science and understands that the core of conservatism centers around finances.

Krydor on November 6, 2008 at 2:56 PM

Rumors are not true if people don’t comment on them.

wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 2:52 PM

Let’s say someone from McCain’s campaign told Carl Cameron on background “I can’t believe we lost to a black dude.”

And this has been played on Fox News and radio station updates for 24 hours now. You can bet if this happened Maverick would be on the phone to his staff and issuing a statement apologizing.

What do we have right now. Crickets. 27 hours since this first broke.

CanadianGuy on November 6, 2008 at 2:56 PM

rhodeymark on November 6, 2008 at 2:44 PM

I thought it was a great idea to go back to Washington — might have been silly to “suspend” the campaign — but I thought that going to DC and trying to work this out was a great idea. I think he could have had a press conference and said that he did his best but that the legislation that was put together is not supportive of what he believed in nor what he wanted and thus, he isn’t supporting it.

It would have given him a clear compare/contrast issue against Obama…and he could have railed as a populist against a relatively unpopular bailout.

Dickie Dunn on November 6, 2008 at 2:56 PM

McCain was a crappy candidate and has never been a friend to conservatives. Now his silence on these smears makes him just as complicit as the schmucks spreading these smears. It’s his way of continuing to stick it to conservatives, which has been his hobby the last 8 years.

BillyRayValentine on November 6, 2008 at 2:57 PM

The McCain campaign sabatoged Palin from the beginning. Why is this such a shock? Why can’t McCain manage his own campaign? We all know that McCain’s employees, didn’t care about him or him winning.

Who could have spent even 10 minutes with Palin, and then decided it would be best for her to be interviewed, interrogated, and quizzed by the vicious, lying, hostile liberal media? Why would McCain have gone along with this?

Anyone with a brain would have focused on her strengths, speeches and friendly interviews. No one knows anything about Obama, he was never vetted by the media, so it would have been fair in that sense. The choice by McCain and the so-called “handlers” and Palin herself to not foresee any of this will never be explained.

I think there are numerous questions for McCain and his judgment as well as his staff, but unfortunately we will never know the truth (unless there are lie dectector tests and/or video). It’s one’s word against another’s.

nottakingsides on November 6, 2008 at 2:58 PM

MadisonConservative on November 6, 2008 at 2:55 PM

You’re an idiot. Eat sh*t and die.

wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 2:58 PM

omnipotent on November 6, 2008 at 2:52 PM

yep, how did that work out for him in North Carolina?

Hawthorne on November 6, 2008 at 2:58 PM

wise_man on November 6, 2008 at 2:53 PM

Cheers mate!

Don’t hate me ‘cuz I’m right.

Where is his courage now? Hmmmmmm?

omnipotent on November 6, 2008 at 2:59 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4


You must be logged in to post a comment.