Comments on: Video: Nadler says Obama “not politically courageous”

By: DasObamaReich

DasObamaReich — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 06:57:56 +0000

test

By: Kevin in Southern Illinois

Kevin in Southern Illinois — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:40:23 +0000

– Yeah he should have left 20 years ago, after the first sermon.

It’s all about character, the one feature Obama does not have.

tarpon on November 3, 2008 at 10:21 AM

Amen!

By: Democratic Congressman” Yes, Obama has no political balls « The Daley Gator

Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:33:56 +0000

[...] Congressman” Yes, Obama has no political balls Yes! We all knew this but it is nice to hear a Liberal Congessman confifm [...]

By: jordy2009

jordy2009 — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 22:28:18 +0000

I have always tought that with his jowls……Nadler only needs to stuff an apple in his mouth to look like a banquet-pig

By: tamtam20

tamtam20 — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 22:24:42 +0000

well mr nadler demonstrated that he
had some NADS………….. but hold
the show…….. he’s now retracting
it……… nadless nadler

By: On the Right

On the Right — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:29:05 +0000

Crazy Uncles And Pusillanimous Nephews…

Video: Nadler says Obama “not politically courageous”
My friend Pam at Atlas Shrugged
got this video over the weekend of Rep. Jerrold Nadler telling
Floridians what has been blindingly obvious all along. It shows both
why the……

By: chiefeditor

chiefeditor — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:38:40 +0000

I don't know why the McCain campaign ever dropped the Wright issue.

By: the_nile

the_nile — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:36:22 +0000

A man with no accomplishments , has to be judged by his associations.

By: Dem NY Congressman Video Infers Obama Chicken « Mcnorman’s Weblog

Dem NY Congressman Video Infers Obama Chicken « Mcnorman’s Weblog — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:28:49 +0000

[...] Yesterday 11-02-08 a NY Congressman Jerrold Nadler stumping in Florida for Obama let’s it rip: Obama “not politically courageous.“ [...]

By: Dee2008

Dee2008 — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:23:38 +0000

Obama’s affiliation with Wright and the TUCC reveals serious problems with Obama’s world view. This story has also revealed the truly frightening aspect of black liberation theology. It’s shown us that racism is still alive and very well in our society. But it’s thriving a place where we least expected to find it–churches.

By: Christine

Christine — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:18:03 +0000

Barry needed the street cred of belonging to that church, but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t agree with the ideology spewed forth by Wright, Flay-grrr and even Farakan.
For once, i don’t hate Nadler. Amazing.

By: Tmac52

Tmac52 — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:36:58 +0000

Who is actually surprised that a dem pol would label Obama a coward? He is what he is. God help America!

By: slp

slp — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:47:03 +0000

jerryofva on November 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM

Remember, the answers to the really tough questions are above Obama’s pay grade.

By: jerryofva

jerryofva — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:28:53 +0000

I think I am dense. Was Nadler sending a message to Jewish voters not to vote for Obama? Tell voters that one candidate, the candidate of your party, lacks political courage is hardly an endorsement. It is more of “the I come to praise Caesar not to bury him” (reverse reference intended).

Whenever a controversial vote came up Obama passed the buck, a sure sign that he lacks political courage. We are on the verge of electing a man who passes the buck to an office where the buck stops moving.

By: tarpon

tarpon — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:21:04 +0000

– Yeah he should have left 20 years ago, after the first sermon.

It’s all about character, the one feature Obama does not have.

By: fogw

fogw — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:14:12 +0000

The question is, if Obama gets elected will the current White House staff remove all of the 1′s from their computer keyboards?

By: Murf76

Murf76 — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:07:41 +0000

Either way, it doesn’t reflect well on Obama. Either he’s a political opportunist who uses faith as a tool to win votes, or he’s a true believer in Wright’s message who got offended at Wright’s attack on him and dumped him only for that reason. I’d call it a combination of the two.

I'm in agreement... it's a combination of both. I've thought all along that Jeremiah Wright tells us everything we need to know about Obama. There's nothing so telling as an examination of that relationship and it's alleged demise. But I don't think it's not an even split between Obama's opportunism and his ego. There's a lopsided slant here, IMO. Frankly, there were LOTS of other churches Obama might have joined for the purpose of "networking". In fact, if memory serves, in his autobiography Obama tells us he was initially warned off from Wright, who already had a reputation for controversy. Obama is certainly an opportunistic politician, but when push comes to shove, he's all about his ego. In an article in August, Sam Vaknin suggests that Obama might be a Pathological Narcissist. I'm not a psychiatrist, but when you've spent some time looking closely at Obama, Vaknin makes a pretty good case. A scary one too.

By: Red Bennet

Red Bennet — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:02:08 +0000

Where did the rest of this guy go?

By: JiangxiDad

JiangxiDad — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:58:59 +0000

and don’t forget nebbish and meshugana.

By: Texas Gal

Texas Gal — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:58:25 +0000

Either he’s a political opportunist who uses faith as a tool to win votes, or he’s a true believer in Wright’s message who got offended at Wright’s attack on him and dumped him only for that reason. I’d call it a combination of the two.

I’d agree that it’s both Ed, but I think using the word faith is a bit of a stretch.

By: JiangxiDad

JiangxiDad — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:56:27 +0000

and probably a gonif.

By: JiangxiDad

JiangxiDad — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:56:01 +0000

and a putz.

By: Seixon

Seixon — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:55:49 +0000

Obama pointed out how campaign financing is broken – by demonstrating how to use every loophole to fraudulently finance a campaign.

Change you can believe in!

By: JiangxiDad

JiangxiDad — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:55:35 +0000

Hey, ex-Democrat… where’s your proof Nadler is an anti-Semite? That’s a serious charge.

Christoph on November 3, 2008 at 9:46 AM

He can’t be an anti-semite, he’s a schmuck.

By: VanPalin

VanPalin — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:49:58 +0000

He was a senator from my state, Illinois, and I cannot remember one particular thing he did for downstaters (that’s everyone NOT in Chicago and collar counties)

He didn’t do a thing- to Chicago politicians like Obama and Blagojevich, people in Peoria or Carbondale or anywhere south of I-80 might as well not exist.