This is the kind of idiocy that the people who are not voting for McCain/Palin will help put into office:

Genocide is only a problem for Obama if it fits into his
political narrative.

(via The Captain)
posted at 10:10 am on October 8, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/08/obamas-180-on-genocide/

Though most of the debate dealt with domestic issues, it was a foreign-policy question that sent me flying to my files. Moderator Tom Brokaw asked the candidates what their “doctrine” would be “in situations where there’s a humanitarian crisis, but it does not affect our national security,” such as “the Congo, where 4.5 million people have died since 1998,” or Rwanda or Somalia.
In such cases, answered Obama, “we have moral issues at stake.” Of course the United States must act to stop genocide, he said. “When genocide is happening, when ethnic cleansing is happening . . . and we stand idly by, that diminishes us.”

But not if you are an Iraqi.Then it is okay for you to be slaughtered.

But that wasn’t how Obama sounded last year, when he was competing for the Democratic nomination and was unbending in his demand for an American retreat from Iraq. Back then, he dismissed fears that a US’t a good enough reason to keep US forces there,” the AP reported on July 20, 2007 (my italics). withdrawal would unleash a massive Iraqi bloodbath. “Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn’t a good enough reason to keep US forces there,” the AP reported on July 20, 2007 (my italics).

UNBELIEVABLE THIS IDIOT GETS AWAY WITH THIS LIBERAL CRAP!!!

Here’s some more super intelligent logic that our local ron
paul supporter wants to help put into office:

Obama on the surge(that has brought us victory in Iraq)

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, on January 10 2007 predicted that the surge of troops in Iraq would fail. “I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there,” he told MSNBC. “In fact, I think it will do the reverse.”
Four days later he told CBS’s Face the Nation that “we cannot impose a military solution on what has effectively become a civil war. And until we acknowledge that reality — we can send 15,000 more troops, 20,000 more troops, 30,000 more troops, I don’t know any expert on the region or any military officer that I’ve spoken to privately that believes that that is going to make a substantial difference on the situation on the ground.”

Then the success of the surge could not be ignored by Obama
and his cheering section the main stream media.

The troop surge in Iraq has been more successful than anyone could have imagined, Barack Obama conceded Thursday in his first-ever interview on FOX News’ “The O’Reilly Factor.”
As recently as July, the Democratic presidential candidate declined to rate the surge a success, but said it had helped reduce violence in the country. On Thursday, Obama acknowledged the 2007 increase in U.S. troops has benefited the Iraqi people.
“I think that the surge has succeeded in ways that nobody anticipated,” Obama said while refusing to retract his initial opposition to the surge. “I’ve already said it’s succeeded beyond our wildest dreams.”

So what does Mr. super intelligent,Mr. supreme judgment say
about his decision making regarding the most important issue
he has had to deal with since being in politics?

When asked by Katie Couric if he would still vote against the Surge knowing what he knows today,Obama replied “YES”

So our little ron paul supporter is more scared of Palin in
dealing with foreign policy than this idiot,great thinking
there genius.

Here is how the guy you want to help elect and his cabinet
view the incredibly dangerous situation we now have in Iran
because of the failure of the EU,Un,and their appeasement policies:

Obama’s ‘Key’ Foreign Policy Adviser: “Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.”
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWViNzMxZTBhYzg4Y2NlZDc3MGI4NzUyYWMxNmY4MGU=

Richard Danzig, who served as Navy Secretary under President Clinton and is tipped to become National Security Adviser in an Obama White House, told a major foreign policy conference in Washington that the future of US strategy in the war on terrorism should follow a lesson from the pages of Winnie the Pooh, which can be shortened to: if it is causing you too much pain, try something else.
Mr Danzig told the Centre for New American Security: “Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.”
(Lest anyone suspect that the Telegraph is exaggerating Danzig’s role in the campaign, note Obama called Danzig “one of our key foreign policy advisers” in November 2007.)

Yea right,Palin is the one we have to worry about.

Baxter Greene on November 2, 2008 at 10:15 PM

The GOP foreign policy is causing more people in the Middle East to hate us, planting the seeds for another 9/11. Al Qaeda will grow larger because of our intervention in the Middle East. If we bomb Iran, we’re only going to make more enemies. We have had aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines parked in the Persian Gulf for decades. No wonder the Iranians hate us. Imagine if China had its battleships parked outside of California. No American would tolerate that.

This is just left wing bullsh!t.Apparently ron paul lover
here does not read any of the fatwa’s or declarations of war
issued by the jihadist they want to kneel down too.
Their quest is the second Caliphate,when they say they want us off their land,it also includes Spain and France as well as many other nations that radical muslims refer to as their
land.Indonesia,Philippines are just a few that have suffered
major jihadist attacks,they occupy no muslim land.Pakistan has lost thousands to jihadist terrorism and they are a muslim nation.

The War on Terror has reduced terrorist attacks across the world and recruitment has diminished dramatically.

Cheer up. We’re winning this War on Terror
Al-Qaeda and the Taleban are in retreat, the surge has worked in Iraq and Islamism is discredited. Not a bad haul
Gerard Baker
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/gerard_baker/article4221376.ece

Until the US-led invasion in 2001, Afghanistan was the cockpit of ascendant Islamist terrorism. Consider the bigger picture. Between 1998 and 2005 there were five big terrorist attacks against Western targets – the bombings of the US embassies in Africa in 1998, the attack on the USS Cole in 2000, 9/11, and the Madrid and London bombings in 2004 and 2005. All owed their success either exclusively or largely to Afghanistan’s status as a training and planning base for al-Qaeda.
In the past three years there has been no attack on anything like that scale. Al-Qaeda has been driven into a state of permanent flight. Its ability to train jihadists has been severely compromised; its financial networks have been ripped apart. Thousands of its activists and enablers have been killed. It’s true that Osama bin Laden’s forces have been regrouping in the border areas of Pakistan but their ability to orchestrate mass terrorism there is severely attenuated. And there are encouraging signs that Pakistanis are starting to take to the offensive against them.
The third and perhaps most significant advance of all in the War on Terror is the discrediting of the Islamist creed and its appeal.
But it has spread way beyond Iraq. As Lawrence Wright described in an important piece in The New Yorker last month, there is growing disgust not just among moderate Muslims but even among other jihadists at the extremism of the terrorists.
Deeply encouraging has been the widespread revulsion in Muslim communities in Europe – especially in Britain after the 7/7 attacks of three years ago. Some of the biggest intelligence breakthroughs in the past few years have been achieved from former al-Qaeda supporters who have turned against the movement.

B.C. researchers find decline in global terrorism, question previous data
1 day ago
http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5iJciaxCBODpiOZKXuLS73Q0gpaBA

VANCOUVER — A group of researchers from Simon Fraser University says global terrorism is on the decline, despite previous data and public perceptions that suggest otherwise.
The university’s Human Security Report Project says fatalities from terrorist attacks around the world have, in fact, decreased by 40 per cent since 2001.

There are many, many, many examples of the success that the War on Terror is having but like Bush and our military have said the whole time since we started on the offensive,is that this is going to be a long battle fought on many fronts.
You can either make a stand against terrorism and the murder,rape,and all out war that it brings or you can be
like the Obama’s and ron paul’s who think that isolationism
and appeasement will just make all of this go away.

Baxter Greene on November 2, 2008 at 10:45 PM