Video: New Obama ad goofs on Palin; Update: Ad remixed
posted at 12:05 pm on October 29, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
A little something to stoke the GOTV fires six days out. Their ad team’s laid off her until now as far as I know; the only spot I can remember her appearing in was one released after she was named, the point of which was to claim that Bush, not Palin, is McCain’s real running mate. The fact that they’re now arguing the opposite shows you how poisonous they think she is to swing voters, backed by the WSJ poll released last week claiming she’s a bigger drag on the ticket than even Dubya. If they’re running this, they can’t be worried about her luring away PUMAs, either. That’s also in line with recent polls showing McCain’s support among Democrats either the same as or only negligibly bigger than The One’s support among Republicans.
Exit question: Time for an 18-minute highlight reel of Biden gaffes as retaliation from Team Maverick?
Update: A reader points to this by way of response.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Obama waaarrriiioorrsss…. come out and plllaaaayy…*
*Sorry, just felt like making a 70s pop-culture reference today.
Pasalubong on October 29, 2008 at 12:07 PM
McCain could do the exact same ad with “Change”. he
Obama made many statements that he wanted a ticket that represented change and the future, not the past. His choice? Joe Biden. 36 years in Washington. NOT the change we need.
rockmom on October 29, 2008 at 12:08 PM
Just run an ad with non-stop BHO and Joe O’Blunder gaffes.
If you can afford a four hour ad buy.
DeweyWins on October 29, 2008 at 12:08 PM
That was pretty lame for a guy with Bazillion dollars to spend on advertising…
Wyznowski on October 29, 2008 at 12:09 PM
You know, considering how much they’ve been spending, shouldn’t ads like this be unnecessary, what with the election having already been decided and all?
Viewtifulgare on October 29, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Mac knows that he does not know. That humility will inspire him to seek out advisors with solid track records of knowing, and rely on their counsel.
Obama is arrogant enough to think that he does know. That makes him dangerous.
The Monster on October 29, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Nah, you let her go out Agnew-Goldwater style…
If Team McCain would have pivoted hard on kitchen table issues(health care) right after the convention and had her lead on those in her speeches and varied up those speeches to get a lot of free tv time then they would be in the lead right now…
ninjapirate on October 29, 2008 at 12:10 PM
You betcha.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on October 29, 2008 at 12:11 PM
Attacking Palin will not win him the election…she is the VP.
Internal polling must show she is his biggest threat…
right2bright on October 29, 2008 at 12:11 PM
BTW, the reason why Palin may be a drag is because she’s not seen as offering anything new… that’s why the damn policy pivots were so important…
ninjapirate on October 29, 2008 at 12:11 PM
Load up the GaffMeister 5000.
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 29, 2008 at 12:11 PM
Has Obambi taken the gloves off now? Surprise! He’s Michael Jackson.
AubieJon on October 29, 2008 at 12:12 PM
I can’t get this video at work. Can someone summarize it?
SAZMD on October 29, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Visit places like Hillary Clinton Forum and you get the impression that (a) either the PUMAs are lying through their faces about their plans; (b) the pollsters are not hitting PUMAs; or (c) the PUMAs are in the hanging-up crowd that the pollsters now appear to be worried about.
Hubris, anyone?
either orr on October 29, 2008 at 12:12 PM
The issue is whether McCain has the judgement to choose advisors who will properly advise him on the economy. A man can’t be an expert on all things, unless you’re “The One”.
More people like Sarah than are admitting in the polls. They should tread lightly on that ground.
sheesh on October 29, 2008 at 12:12 PM
LOL! Who is the economic genius on the Dem ticket? The guy who can’t count how many letters in the word JOBS? Or the guy who wasted millions on improving education in Chicago??
ctmom on October 29, 2008 at 12:12 PM
+1
Mr_Magoo on October 29, 2008 at 12:13 PM
I’ve got my buck on “you won’t see a damn thing. Again.”
ChipDWood on October 29, 2008 at 12:13 PM
Wow.. am I the only one who sees this as a Pro McCain/Palin ad?
DaveC on October 29, 2008 at 12:13 PM
Whatever. I like the winks. Unless Biden starts winking that would just be creepy. Shudder.
sammypants on October 29, 2008 at 12:13 PM
His choice?
A governor of a state who oversaw a budget of 60 billion dollars.
So what’s the problem?
MadisonConservative on October 29, 2008 at 12:13 PM
What did someone post a long time ago, at least it seems like a long time ago!!
Flipfloparamadamadingdong???
OT NC voters beware of voting straight ticket….
And you just thought the “hanging chad” was bad….This is a total outrage….
Subject: DON’T VOTE A STRAIGHT TICKET!
I heard about this on the news the other night. I guess it’s really true.
Snopes says it is. I can’t believe such a glitch exists in the system.
Subject: Don’t Vote a Straight Ticket!
I have been informed by an Obama supporter, that if one votes straight Democrat or Republican ticket at the polls, BEFORE you have voted for the President, your vote for President WILL NOT be counted. If you go to snopes.com, you will see that this is true and it tells you that it’s a good idea to vote for each candidate individually, in any case.
I’m happy to get this info and want to pass it along, since it’s already circulating among Obama supporters.
We need all our Republican votes to count, so I owe a debt of gratitude to the Democrat who “mistakenly” sent the email my way. Thanks!
Even if you know this, others may not, so please pass it on! I think everyone’s vote should count, but ONCE, only!
snopes.com: Voting a Straight Ticket
http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/straightticket.asp
http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/straightticket.asp
reshas1 on October 29, 2008 at 12:14 PM
French President Nicolas Sarkozy is very critical of U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama’s positions on Iran.
Sarkozy views the Democratic candidate’s stance on Iran as “utterly immature” and comprised of “formulations empty of all content.”
….Sarkozy told Obama at that meeting that if the new American president elected in November changed his country’s policy toward Iran, that would be “very problematic.”
…..Sarkozy fears that Obama might “arrogantly” ignore the other members of this front and open a direct dialogue with Iran without preconditions.
*Where is this sort of Sarkozy response ad that hits Obama on Iran and meeting with no preconditions.
moxie_neanderthal on October 29, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Use the clip with the higher IQ, top of the class, full scholarship claims.
Yeah, that’s it!
drjohn on October 29, 2008 at 12:16 PM
And yet, in spite of all the brilliant insights you have offered Team McCain, they consistently ignored your pearls of wisdom and will nevertheless win on November 4.
ManlyRash on October 29, 2008 at 12:16 PM
End the ad with Joe Plugs waving and grinning and driving off in his 60’s Corvette (yes he drives one).
Mr_Magoo on October 29, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Ive been saying all along Palin doesn’t rub centrists/independents the right way. But with regards to the ad, its really McCain’s goof for hinting that he’d pick a VP who was strong on the economy…instead he picked a VP who’s strong on…hmm…what were her strengths again?
o rite, running a successful statewide campaign in a state with 250,000 less people in it than my suburb of Westchester County…then running said state awash in money with no urban centers or agricultural policy…and the highest per capita rape numbers in the country.
Now, i wouldn’t consider my governor the black blind paterson an expert on finance just because he governs wall st…thus i wont consider Palin an expert on energy because she governs a producing state.
Palin’s fine for hard-right conservatives…but middle of the road types have precious little to see in her, except maybe style. She projects middle america averageness, but i thought style over substance was only how democrats felt about their candidate…
ernesto on October 29, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Wow what a well run campaign. /sarcasm
Cardiganfox on October 29, 2008 at 12:18 PM
I’ve been trying to get the point across for weeks, their object is to not just win. Their object is not just humiliate us. Their object is to completely destroy us as a political entity.
Nancy Peloski says her Congress will be more bi-partisaned? What was up with the last two years then?
hawkdriver on October 29, 2008 at 12:18 PM
Yeah, B.O., that’s right.
McCain’s choice was Sarah Palin.
Your choice was Joe “Gaffes ‘r Us” Biden.
’nuff said.
pilamaye on October 29, 2008 at 12:18 PM
Uh, no. This was not an effective add.
How do I know? Because this thread has attracted ninjapirate who says with a straight face that Palin doesn’t offer anything new and that’s why this ad is effective.
That’s a pretty moronic statement.
Editor on October 29, 2008 at 12:18 PM
He’s right about this people…if you use a touchscreen on tuesday for the LOVE OF GOD DONT HIT STRAIGHT TICKET!
Better yet lobby your state governments to reinstate the level system that we have in NY, we’re the last state to use it, and they’re cumbersome machines…but they freakin work. period
ernesto on October 29, 2008 at 12:18 PM
Palin is not a drag. She’s an asset, as the crowds who mob her appearances clearly demonstrate. You need to pivot from fellating yourself to observing reality.
ManlyRash on October 29, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Allow me to tranlate from Libspeak:
“My Congress will not have arguments. We’ll have such a majority that we won’t have to bother arguing with the Republicans. They’ll be allowed to vote however they please and we’ll just ignore them, because they won’t have enough votes to do anything about it.”
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 29, 2008 at 12:19 PM
If they took my wisdom they would be winning…
1. Policy pivots right after the convention when they were ahead to solidify the lead with people just looking at the ticket…
2. Let Palin lead on those new issues in controlled speeches so she could prep on the rest of the stuff
ninjapirate on October 29, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Saw this this morning. Pissed me off, frankly.
As if a woman couldn’t handle her purse strings.
Abby Adams on October 29, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Weak.
CP on October 29, 2008 at 12:21 PM
totally got it (beer bottles and all)
okonkolo on October 29, 2008 at 12:22 PM
I swear to god Sarah is winking at me specifically.
I love her.
redshirt on October 29, 2008 at 12:22 PM
Palin managed budget of the State of Alaska.
What’s 49 more states?
Or using Obama’s math, 56.
Kini on October 29, 2008 at 12:23 PM
And just how is Barry and Joe any better on economic policies? Last I checked the checkbook for a community organizer was pretty small and other then all the money Joe channels from lobbyists and puts into earmark spending he ain’t exactly no Wall St whiz kid either.
Pretty lame ad.
Of course I guess figuring a way around doing any sort of identity verification on campaign contributions does give us a clue as to how he would fund his $4.3 TRILLION in additional spending he is proposing.
How is Barry going to pay back all that money he spent when the banks come looking for their money from all those fraudulent donors?
Just A Grunt on October 29, 2008 at 12:23 PM
That was weird.
I felt better about McCain after watching this.
Is this really supposed to work for Obama?
Count to 10 on October 29, 2008 at 12:23 PM
It is always dangerous to pick on the chick. Also it lowers any presidential candidate to run against the VP on the opposite ticket. I don’t think this is helpful.
Dirthead on October 29, 2008 at 12:24 PM
You know, this crap pisses me off. Its not even that good an ad, but the very idea that she’s some moron is absolutely ridiculous, especially considering the guy on THEIR ticket. If McCain doesn’t get an ad up soon with the Biden gaffes, then that is tantamount to throwing Palin under the bus. She’s the one I’m voting for in the first place!
changer1701 on October 29, 2008 at 12:25 PM
You betcha! It’s true! How many of us got excited ONLY after McCain chose Palin? I was always going to vote for the GOP nominee, but now I can do it with a grin on my face.
Oink on October 29, 2008 at 12:25 PM
Close, but I’d include his history of being downright dishonest, (plagiarism in law school/Neil Kinnock’s speech), pattern of exaggerations (helicopters forced down/shot at). arrogance (I’ve forgotten more than most of my colleagues know) misstatements (forced Hezbullah out of Lebanon), petty/childish (I can tell you my IQ is a lot higher than yours)
Media has given this guy a total pass.
Note to Dems: I’ll see your Palin “I read them all” and raise you a “gird your loins”
moxie_neanderthal on October 29, 2008 at 12:25 PM
Lame.
And besides, Palin is doing a better job of turning off independents all by herself.
She’s an albatross.
Dave Rywall on October 29, 2008 at 12:25 PM
I’d hardly call it a ‘goof’. Usually with the idea of ‘goofing’, there is a comedic aspect.
Palin as veep is hardly funny.
http://thepajamapundit.com/
thePajamaPundit on October 29, 2008 at 12:25 PM
It’s hilarious that they’ve been doing that this whole campaign. Always compare Obama to Palin, never to McCain, when it comes to experience.
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 29, 2008 at 12:25 PM
Sexiiiiissstt!!!!
csdeven on October 29, 2008 at 12:25 PM
Dude..
she is so not winking at you..
it’s me she is winking at.
DaveC on October 29, 2008 at 12:26 PM
The only thing anyone needs to know about Joe Biden is this:
He’s been in the US Senate for 35 years; he was in the US Senate when John McCain was in the Hanoi Hilton, getting the crap tortured out of him every day.
Joe Biden is now in the Top 20 of Longest-serving US Senators…in our entire History!
And you know what his fellow Democratic Senators thing of old Slo-Joe?
He has been selected for NOT ONE “Leadership” position in the US Senate by his peers, in his entire 35 year career!
NOT ONE!
What type of distinguished “leadership” track-record is that?
Why the McCain camp hasn’t hammered that home, is beyond me; but it speaks volumne about what his very own Peers thing about him, doesn’t it?
Dale in Atlanta on October 29, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Operative: “That girl is an albatross.”
Malcolm Reynolds: “Well, last I figgered it, an albatross was a ship’s good luck – ’til some gorram fool went and killed it.”
Thanks Dave!!!
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 29, 2008 at 12:27 PM
She may a drag… but if Team McCain didn’t want her to be a drag they should have let her actually lead with some innovative policy while people were looking… even before this stock market crash I was easy to see that this ticket would tank without changes… people were looking for something new… not a puppet…
This election will be won or lost on policy… it’s just stupid to blame Bush, the economy, the media, palin, etc… if there’s anything to blame is is the McCain, his top advisors, and insular republican consultant culture… there’s a total lack of forward looking innovation and the policy that’s good they suck at selling…
ninjapirate on October 29, 2008 at 12:28 PM
Ah, didn’t see you there.
Add me.
I think this is a clear indication of how Obama would spend federal money.
Count to 10 on October 29, 2008 at 12:29 PM
My wife could be described as a blue dog dem. Never voted (R) before but is this year because she despises Obama.
She likes Palin. A lot.
I think Palin works with swing state independants, people in places like PA and OH who usually vote Dem but don’t much care for Obama.
BadgerHawk on October 29, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Have you read the poem?
The albatross was showing the way to safety, and was hung around the neck of the one that killed it to show his guilt.
Count to 10 on October 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM
Time for McCain to purchase a half hour in primetime featuring Gaffemaster J.
NoFanofLibs on October 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM
I tuned into Air America one day and they were telling all their listeners DO NOT VOTE STRAIGHT TICKET. They brought up NC, and said that might be the case in a couple other states as well.
DO NOT VOTE STRAIGHT TICKET. Vote for your (R)s one at a time. It’ll prolong the happiness.
BadgerHawk on October 29, 2008 at 12:32 PM
I’m not overwhelmingly impressed with Sarah. But I think the wink was very endearing. I’m not sure it sends the message Obama thinks it does.
And yeah, Obama knows everything about everything. Just ask him. The all knowing Dear Leader O.
petunia on October 29, 2008 at 12:32 PM
I might have back in Jr. High/High School, but I don’t remember much of it. I was quoting Serenity.
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 29, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Yeah…. Where’s Romney when you need him.
Seixon on October 29, 2008 at 12:33 PM
What budget has Obama ever managed? As a community organizer? How does that compare to Wasilla much less the entire state of Alaska?
csdeven on October 29, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Ok. That has got tto be the lamest ad by any campaign this cycle. I think this ad is actually a net gain for McCain
ConservativePartyNow on October 29, 2008 at 12:33 PM
How STUPID. They post her winking? What no gaffes to post, no situations where she said something stupid about the economy or economics? Pitiful.
ihasurnominashun on October 29, 2008 at 12:34 PM
There you go again Allah, believing in polls that are now looking very tainted, biased or completely wrong. What no Al Jazeera a.k.a CBS/NYT polls? I am shocked I say, shocked! LOL!
Funny how I have read from articles that say Obama campaign people saying they ARE AFRAID OF PALIN. Redstate had one on how they believe they will not know her full impact until it is too late. Another article elsewhere was saying she has been a strong unifier for bringing the Base together with McCain. This according to Dems. You might say big deal, but McCain cannot win without us.
Also, Palin does have good economical and business sense. She has run a state budget and managed to give money back to Alaskans. She also was at one time a Mayor. Is there not a saying that all politics are local? I believe this could apply to this race in that she has owned a business, been a Mayor and Governor and yes, I will even throw in a PTA member. It is the local politics that has given her solid common sense when it comes to knowing how government should work both on a local level, and on a state level, and now on a national level. Just imagine how things nationally might be if the U.S. functioned like the state of Alaska or any town U.S.A. that balances their budget and only spends what they take in!
Attacking Palin is also going to make them look like the MSM that has been treating Palin as a stooge, or village idiot. You might want to consider what the SNL people had to say about Palin when you think about how there might be something to the Democrats actually being afraid of Palin, and quit placing so much stock in those Swiss cheese polls you LOVE so much. LOL!
freeus on October 29, 2008 at 12:34 PM
I do. All that the McCain/Palin campaign has to do is list off the myriad ways that Palin has been a good steward in Alaska, demonstrating economic chops that saved the taxpayers and delivered energy and services. Follow all of those visuals with a Palin wink.
onlineanalyst on October 29, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Palin’s strengths were reform and energy. Energy is much less of an issue now than when McCain picked her. Of course, Biden was supposed to be a foreign policy guru, and that is less of an issue as well. So both VPs best aspects have been diminished.
And could anyone please summarize this ad? I can’t see it at work.
SAZMD on October 29, 2008 at 12:35 PM
For most people, that’s a pro McCain/Palin ad
To commited Obama supporters this must look pretty smart, but to most normal people the fact that McCain says he doesn’t understand economics just makes him human, humble, and sane.
Lets hope they show this everywhere!
Paul Murphy on October 29, 2008 at 12:35 PM
I’m seeing a lot more McCain/Palin signs and bumper stickers. What I would like to see is some Palin/MaCain signs and bumper stickers. The lady should always go first.
On a serious note: I think Palin has been good for McCain. He’s articulating his ideas better, hitting harder, and sounding more conservative. A good woman by your side always brings out the best in you.
Tommy_G on October 29, 2008 at 12:36 PM
I got an e-mail from him asking me to donate. Too bad all his advisors are trying to hurt McCain’s chances.
BadgerHawk on October 29, 2008 at 12:36 PM
What he doesn’t realize as many dems don’t is that more conservatives are voting for Paline then they are voting for McCain.
lwssdd on October 29, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Water, Water, everywhere,
and all the boards did shrink.
Water, Water, everywhere,
but not a drop to drink.
Honestly, I don’t remember much of it either. The movie “White Squall” also brings it up, as the featured sailing ship is the “Albatross.”
Count to 10 on October 29, 2008 at 12:36 PM
I certainly haven’t seen where she is a drag on the ticket and I really question the folks who think she is. Sure are a lot people attending rallies where she is speaking.
Liberals wishing and hoping she was a drag are about the only people saying this.
My new rule of thumb in reading newspaper stories about the McCain/Palin ticket is to just mentally substitute Barack/Joe in my mind. They make so much more sense that way.
Just A Grunt on October 29, 2008 at 12:36 PM
I can’t tell if that was an ad for Obama or McCain? After seeing it, I feel even more compelled to vote McCain. Keep up the great work, Obama.
Texas Rainmaker on October 29, 2008 at 12:37 PM
That’s it?
She can just brag about turning a deficit into a surplus if asked about this.
lodge on October 29, 2008 at 12:37 PM
Since when does Palin not understand the economy?
What credentials does Barry have exactly? Other than being well-versed in Marx and Mao, of course.
Buy Danish on October 29, 2008 at 12:37 PM
Shiny!
(and Mal was right about the albatross…)
Darksean on October 29, 2008 at 12:39 PM
No narration, just a couple of lines from McCain being humble on the economy (you’ve probably seen them before), and one saying he will probably get help from his VP. Then a text shot “His choice” and then Palin winking. After that, its just the standard “this is an Obama ad” lines.
Count to 10 on October 29, 2008 at 12:40 PM
A review for Joe Biden:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7RJAnefJKA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NrQ36Djf2E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=597YG23mAWs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDVUPqoowf8
And just for good measure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yYlzX2ZOLM
:-)
Abby Adams on October 29, 2008 at 12:40 PM
That one is likely to backfire on barry. My bet is that when they do a focus group after running it a couple of times it disappears quickly.
peacenprosperity on October 29, 2008 at 12:42 PM
Dang. I tried to post a coupl eof youtube links to McCain ads (about Joe the Clown), and it gobbled my post. Alas.
Abby Adams on October 29, 2008 at 12:43 PM
Oh, I forgot the “This November, you get to make yours” before “I’m Barak Obama, and…”
Actually, the only spoken words are Obama at the end.
Nice little folksy acoustic guitar for music.
Count to 10 on October 29, 2008 at 12:43 PM
They show a few quotes of McCain (in text, not spoken) saying he’s better on foreign policy than he is on the economy, and he’ll choose a solid economic VP. Then they show a clip of Palin winking.
There’s no words, just some background music to go with the pictures of McCain and Palin. I don’t think it’s terrible, but it’s not a good use of money either.
BadgerHawk on October 29, 2008 at 12:44 PM
I hope they give this ad the widest possible release. Kristol at TWS is right that it also gives the McCain camp an opportunity to counterattack through Palin herself.
It shows you how deranged the reaction to her on the left is that they wouldn’t immediately recognize how misogynistic this ad plays: They don’t even give Palin the chance to speak for herself – she’s just “the female,” as though that’s what disqualifies her.
That horrible Obama corporate muzak is really something, too. They used it on a Health Care ad that was playing constantly in California and therefore I would expect nationwide. It’s frightening to think that people who find that stuff appealing are hoping to run the country.
CK MacLeod on October 29, 2008 at 12:44 PM
D’oh. Just took it a minute to appear. Please just go on about your business as I wallow in self-pity.
Abby Adams on October 29, 2008 at 12:44 PM
The next line made the scene though – “Yes, I read a poem, try not to faint.” :D
Also loved “Hell, I’m fond of all Seven [Sins], but for now I think I’m gonna go with Wrath.”
Classic. :)
>_> Aaaaaand now I’m off topic again.
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 29, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Thanks. That does sound lame. And that wink resonates more than people think. IYKWIMAITYD.
SAZMD on October 29, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Fixed it fer ya.
peacenprosperity on October 29, 2008 at 12:45 PM
LOL We’ll pity you too if you like :)
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 29, 2008 at 12:45 PM
The two largest fears inside the Obama campaign are the Bradley Effect and the Palin impact. According to an article I read last week, they are particularly concerned with the fact she is reaching people across the spectrum and in numbers “they can’t measure”. Much fear there for team Obama. Obviously they now consider that impact larger than the PUMAs. I disagree with AP. I don’t think they consider the PUMA damage small… I think they consider it unfixable. I also think from their internal polling, they obviously aren’t falling for the “Palin’s a drag on the ticket” pablum that AP does. Consequently, there is no danger in trying to knock Palin down… only perceived potential gain.
CC – BHO: “my Muslim faith”
CapedConservative on October 29, 2008 at 12:46 PM
They’ve seen what it took in Alaska to get their finances in order, so, they’re shaking in their boots.. HAHA.
(no more graft/good old boys networks !!)
pambi on October 29, 2008 at 12:47 PM
No, Firefly SHOULD be the topic. Always.
Darksean on October 29, 2008 at 12:47 PM
Three words. “GOD DAMN AMERICA”
marklmail on October 29, 2008 at 12:48 PM
Hu!,..that was it?
Ok,..now back to the car chase on Fox News!
christene on October 29, 2008 at 12:48 PM
Where’s the “not without my teleprompter” commercial?
bloghooligan on October 29, 2008 at 12:49 PM
So I guess that means McCain will lose, right Dave?
Dave? You there, Dave?
ManlyRash on October 29, 2008 at 12:49 PM
Thanks, Abby….
GOP should be running this one, 24/7 !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=597YG23mAWs
pambi on October 29, 2008 at 12:50 PM
BTW-Good News!…both of the men in the car chase have been caught,..and that’s two less votes for obama..Florida.
christene on October 29, 2008 at 12:55 PM
I can live with that. :D
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 29, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »