Video: Palin talks clothes
posted at 4:58 pm on October 26, 2008 by Allahpundit
Jonathan Martin wonders why she’d broach this subject, thereby keeping it alive for another news cycle. The likely answer, per his colleague: Because she had nothing to do with the RNC clothes purchases and is boiling about what it’s done to her image.
[T]he final straw for Palin and her allies was the news that the campaign had reported spending $150,000 on her clothes, turning her, again, into the butt of late-night humor.
“She never even set foot in these stores,” the senior Republican said, noting Palin hadn’t realized the cost when the clothes were brought to her in her Minnesota hotel room.
“It’s completely out-of-control operatives,” said the close ally outside the campaign. “She has no responsibility for that. It’s incredibly frustrating for us and for her.”
McCain defended her this morning on MTP but doubtless he’d like to change the subject. Maybe tomorrow.
The video I really wanted to give you was of her warning Obama not to pop the champagne just yet — “You kinda get the feeling that the Obama campaign thinks this whole election process is just a formality” — but I can’t find it. If you see it somewhere, I’d be grateful for the tip. In lieu of that, you’ll find Hasselbeck’s intro of Palin today below. Exit quotation: “This is deliberately sexist.”
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
The unwashed masses of America trying to make ends meet…
Um… the masses of America are a lot less unwashed than anywhere else in the wold, dude. And they are making ends meet a lot better, are a lot better educated, and by the way, a lot less racist. You basically don’t know WTF you are talking about, but then you are a Dem (BIRM).
drunyan8315 on October 26, 2008 at 8:02 PM
You know – Rywall – it seems like you didn’t get your wish in Canada either.
If Sarah had been kerry’s wife (yuk!) no one would have to buy her clothes, she has a billion dollar wardrobe. (Oh, gosh it was her money after all). Hillary took everything out of the White House and has gazillion pant suits and no one asked how much was spent on her wardrobe. Sarah buys her clothes from consignment shops and of course you and the msm and the feminists would have gone crazy about her cheap clothes. She can’t win! She’s a smart, intelligent, hard working woman, married to one man, who hasn’t had an abortion and the feminists hate her for it. Just so you know about obama and the money they are spending, and I’d like to know where all of this is coming from.
BULLETIN: NBC News is reporting that in the first two weeks of October, Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign spent so much money on TV advertising in the key battleground states that their spending averaged out to be $293,000 PER HOUR!
Eh gads!!!
Bambi on October 26, 2008 at 8:02 PM
Dave Rywall on October 26, 2008 at 7:36 PM
You do realize that of the four (McCain, Obama, Biden & Palin), Palin is the only one who isn’t a millionaire.
BTW, any idea how much those fugly pant suits that Hillary wears cost?
$160k between the two of them? Wow. Filthy rich bastards.
Some GOP employees spend a reported $150k for clothing that she and her family won’t be keeping because the clothes will be donated to charity when this is over and they never told her how much was spent.
Any idea how much those fugly pant suits that Hillary wears cost?
Yeah. She and the GOP deserves to be condemned by the likes of you, Dave. At least they paid for them. Not sure I can say the same about your friends at the DNC.
GT on October 26, 2008 at 8:03 PM
Roger:
So Palin is not good enough for you either. It would seem to me that a smart guy like you would be running things in the RNC rather than running your mouth at Hot Air.
Terrye on October 26, 2008 at 8:03 PM
Hmmmmm…..If Obama “has it in the bag”, how about donating the remaining funds to charity? Anyone want bet what he does with those millions of dollars after the election?
GT on October 26, 2008 at 8:05 PM
So Cindy makes John live on what he makes, and they don’t share any of her money? Must have missed that somewhere.
trailboss on October 26, 2008 at 8:05 PM
He’s another Cliff Clavin – minus the charm and sex-appeal.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:06 PM
Well, well, well ……….. not to get back on track or anything, but look at this little gem……
Seven Percent Solution on October 26, 2008 at 8:06 PM
After he loses, he may need it for his legal defense. Odds are Rezko will chirp like a canary. We may yet be treated to the spectacle of the The One being frog-marched into federal court.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:07 PM
Sorry, had to fix that… many Males today are not MEN… Just as many Females today are not Real Women, or especialy Ladies…
Romeo13 on October 26, 2008 at 8:07 PM
I saw these same speeches from Tampa, FL today at Kissimmee, FL. Elizabeth Hasselbeck gave her Tampa speech word-for-word. Sarah had a slightly different take on the clothes nonsense, mentioning her favorite consignment store in Anchorage, AK, then continuing on with a very tightly argued speech on the issues.
This was an excited and motivated crowd. It was a welcome change from the whining of some on HA. I realize we can’t all be ManlyRash, but it’s time to buck up and get out the [legal] votes for McCain.
Right_of_Attila on October 26, 2008 at 8:07 PM
Andrew Sullivan of The Atlantic has posted this disgusting video at his blog, calling it the “New Face of Republicanism”.
I call it the new face of ‘journalism’.
Buy Danish on October 26, 2008 at 8:07 PM
Repeating yourself.
trailboss on October 26, 2008 at 8:08 PM
trailboss:
I was talking about the individual incomes of the people involved in the race. McCain’s income is about $380 grand a year. I never said he did not have access to any other money, but McCain signed a prenup and Cindy’s money is not his money.
I am not saying the man lives in poverty. But then again there are all sorts of millionare Democrats out there, Pelosi and Reid to name a couple. If you really want to go down this road, 17 of the top 20 wealthiest people in the Senate are Democrats.
Terrye on October 26, 2008 at 8:10 PM
Sometimes it’s necessary when the Cliff Clavins of the internet spring up from the woodwork.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:10 PM
*smirk*
Granted.
Count to 10 on October 26, 2008 at 8:11 PM
I really do think most people do not care, nor do they expect a presidential candidate to be wearing clothes from WalMart.
Is anyone else really caring about this other than the media?
Forgive me,, I don’t watch the MSM news, so, maybe I’m out of the loop.
JellyToast on October 26, 2008 at 8:12 PM
Or when you spend most of your day busily typing comments at Hot Air, you’re bound to repeat yourself at times.
trailboss on October 26, 2008 at 8:13 PM
Shaved…au naturel…*raises a glass to toast* as long as they are women. A toast to our wives and lovers…may they never mee!
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:13 PM
I think I’ve lost the thread of this thread. Wealthy dems in the Senate? I thought they were all socialists!
trailboss on October 26, 2008 at 8:14 PM
I wasn’t aware that you were tracking my activity. How…creepy…of you to notice.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:15 PM
Jelly:
I think most people think it is an idiotic topic of discussion. War, the economy, the deficit and the press is wasting time on this. No wonder papers are going under and network news is losing viewers.
Terrye on October 26, 2008 at 8:15 PM
In case I forgot to say it before, tks.
JiangxiDad on October 26, 2008 at 8:15 PM
If the face of ‘journalism’ reflects that of a Fidel Castro’s anus that fell out…………. I agree.
Seven Percent Solution on October 26, 2008 at 8:16 PM
Don’t have to track, you show up everywhere and anywhere. I can’t find a thread without you being in the middle of it. Creepy.
trailboss on October 26, 2008 at 8:16 PM
No need to say it, JD. It’s understood. :-)
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:17 PM
Please provide (1) the location of the homes, (2) the owner of each home, and (3) who uses each home.
I’ll help. Starting with (2), it’s my understanding that McCain owns none of them. Do you know any differently?
Continuing with (1), I’m aware of (a) a DC-area home where he lives while working there; (b) an AZ-area home where Cindy maintains the homestead; (c) the Sedonia ranch; (d) a condo in La Jolla, CA, that Cindy bought and used when rehabbing from a stroke; (e) a Phoenix-area condo that Cindy’s aunt lives in; and (f) another Phoenix-area condo (?) where Cindy and John’s daughter lives.
By my count, I see six. Where’s the seventh? It may exist; I’ve just never seen it reported.
Concluding with (3), McCain uses the DC-area residence, the Phoenix-area residence, and the Sedonia ranch.
Conclusions: First, Cindy McCain is wealthy. Second, Cindy McCain, trusts that she has created, or trusts for her benefit created under her parents’ estate planning documents own six (maybe seven) residential properties. Third, McCain uses only three of the residential properties; and, fourth, as a practical matter, I suspect that McCain can “use” the aunt’s residence and the daughter’s residence only if they invite him over for coffee.
I can’t say whether he’s ever used the CA condo, but I doubt that he has.
So can we logically limit the discussion to three residences? Or should we continue debating the Obama talking points?
And if we’re going to talk about residential properties, when are Obama and Biden going to reveal to the public their secrets for getting significant discounts on home-purchase prices from their sellers? Now, that’s information that I’m confident middle-class voters would like to know.
Obama:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/16/AR2006121600729_pf.html
Biden:
http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080906/NEWS02/809060343&template=printart
Anyone? Anyone?
BuckeyeSam on October 26, 2008 at 8:17 PM
And yet…you are the only one who has said anything. Or appears to be bothered by it. Yes, it is creepy.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:18 PM
“Unwashed masses of America trying to make ends meet”–either talking about the filthy rich, or else being a real asshole calling the economically challenged dirty people.
The only critics of Sarah Palin dressing well are elitists who reserve the right to dress well themselves, but repudiate the come-uppance of an outsider wearing their fashion better than they do.
These same asshole critics repudiate the act of charity, donating fine clothes to “unwashed masses of America trying to make ends meet” since no one has the right to wear nice threads except Ivy League inspired elitist snobs.
Get over the fact that someone shopped for some clothes that Palin is wearing first before giving away to a working mother without the means to buy a wardrobe so nice. Republicans are generous contributors to charities.
Whereas, Democrats like Obama take all the pieces of pie and all of the pies for themselves, PROMISING to spread the wealth. Obama’s brother didn’t get any of Obama’s wealth spread. We see how well Stalin spread the wealth. We see how well African Marxist governments spread the wealth. We see how well Castro spread the wealth.
maverick muse on October 26, 2008 at 8:18 PM
trailboss:
Who says socialists are all poor? Especially once they have made the money. They develop this I got mine now screw you attitude.
Look at Soros, billionare hedge fund operator railing about the injustices of capitalism.
In fact their attitude is that if they can just increase the size of those welfare checks and pacify the peasants then they can go their merry way. And once they have made sure that they can sit on their fortunes like old royalty, they will be fine.
Terrye on October 26, 2008 at 8:19 PM
Nicely done, Sam. Nicely done.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:19 PM
Sure, I don’t see a lot of difference between 3 and 7, or 3 and 50 for that matter. World of difference between 1 and 3.
trailboss on October 26, 2008 at 8:20 PM
Of course they are. Liberals have one set of rules and beliefs for the masses and a completely different set for themselves. How many leaders of communist states live in the poverty that their subjects do? How many liberals are as willing to spread their own wealth as they are to spread everyone else’s?
neuquenguy on October 26, 2008 at 8:20 PM
ManlyRash is an asset to Hot Air and I am sure I am not the only one who feels this way. If you have some sordid jealousy or something why don’t you just grow up and get over it.
carbon_footprint on October 26, 2008 at 8:20 PM
Manly:
trailboss is stalking you.
Terrye on October 26, 2008 at 8:22 PM
*locks and loads* Kewl.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:23 PM
Yes, they call them caviar socialists for a reason. It is like Al Gore living in his mansions, flying private jets around, hanging out on his luxury houseboat..lecturing me about the demise of the planet earth.
Terrye on October 26, 2008 at 8:24 PM
LearJet Liberals is what I believe they are called these days.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:25 PM
Evidence would most likely show that most socialists are comfortably wealthy, as public servants, college professors, politicians, or pundits.
Count to 10 on October 26, 2008 at 8:26 PM
Thanks. But I damned serious about those secrets about discounts on purchase-prices for homes. And I want to know why Obama is making $64,000 gifts to Rezko’s wife and not filing a federal gift tax return to reflect it. Obama’s the guy who wants to preserve the federal estate tax at a top rate of 45%. The federal gift tax and the federal estate tax are part of a unitary transfer-tax system. Taxable gifts made during life affect the amount of estate tax ultimately payable at death.
Obama needs to report the gift.
BuckeyeSam on October 26, 2008 at 8:28 PM
Creepy. Got any better defense, or should I say, obfuscation and misdirection in order to deflect attention from your creepy habits?
What is it that keeps you glued to your keyboard, day in and day out? Surely you have better things to do with your time, no?
trailboss on October 26, 2008 at 8:28 PM
All of this dirty laundry will come tumbling out of the hamper after McCain is elected. Let us slay one dragon at a time, my friend.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:29 PM
Nice response–the non-response. You framed the debate; you’re not entitled to change the subject.
BuckeyeSam on October 26, 2008 at 8:30 PM
Someone sounds…dare I say it? Obsessed.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:30 PM
Still no answer to the question, ManlyFungus? Embarrassed?
trailboss on October 26, 2008 at 8:32 PM
Manly, you might want to run some spy software blocker there, looks that there are some people very interested in your every move out there :)
neuquenguy on October 26, 2008 at 8:32 PM
FTR I know neither yours nor ManlyRash’s HotAir habits, nor could I care less, but, just to point out the obvious…if you see a person all over threads it means you’re reading at least quite a few of them.
Some people read fast. Some people type fast. Some people can do both fast. Some people have personal situations that allow them time on the computer, and think it worth their time to spend it as they like.
*shrugs*
All due respect, I don’t think my spending time thinking about how another chooses to spend computer time is a productive use of my time, if it doesn’t affect me.
inviolet on October 26, 2008 at 8:33 PM
It’s driving him nuts. This is fun to watch.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:33 PM
Did Andrew Sullivan really post that?? That is the most disgusting thing I have ever seen regarding a put down of a veep. The woman is a mother for Chrissake. these people have no shame. I would like to put a hit on that guy.
If Andrew Sullivan still claims to be a conservative or a republican…well, we need to clean house before we can be successful again. We lost our common decency.
Hey WomanlyRush, why would I bet with you? You have already made that bet many times. So, if McCain loses, which he obviously will, you will already be forced to leave the forum (and use your other name, Mr. Right2Bright). So, since you have to leave once (not if) McCain loses embarrassingly bad, why would I risk my posting privileges since YOU have nothing to bargain for??
Got it? Easy, isnt it? Or, am I typing too fast, genius?
Roger Waters on October 26, 2008 at 8:39 PM
I didn’t see it as an attack on campaign staff, but as a riposte to the media who’ve made an issue of it to distract from the very real problems with their favorites.
Jim Treacher on October 26, 2008 at 8:41 PM
Not questioning anyone’s rights to use their time as they please, just wondering why MR seems to spend so much time on HA, but he seems too embarrassed to give a direct answer. c’est la vie.
trailboss on October 26, 2008 at 8:42 PM
Salon communists = caviar socialists = Lear Jet liberals = trouble for any free people.
profitsbeard on October 26, 2008 at 8:42 PM
OT: Over two dozen homes vandalized in Gainesville, FL, with satanic messages and “F**k McCain” written on nearly all of them.
MadisonConservative on October 26, 2008 at 8:43 PM
My dear Mr. Rash, you’ve created a visual that may have me laughing so hard I…well, you get the picture…
uncivilized on October 26, 2008 at 8:45 PM
Yes, your nonchalance is really coming through loud and clear, trollboss.
MadisonConservative, I’m really starting to like the PUMAs.
Jim Treacher on October 26, 2008 at 8:45 PM
*theme from the Good, the Bad & the Ugly abruptly stops; Manly holsters his six-shooter, turns around in disgust and walks away*
Just what I figured…a loudmouth chickensh!t coward.
*spits on the ground*
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:45 PM
No way. If Rezko was going to turn state’s evidence on Obama, he already would have done so. He’ll probably take down the governor, but that’s it. And once Obama is elected, rest assured, Mr. Rezko will be disappeared if he starts singing ANYTHING about Obama.
Outlander on October 26, 2008 at 8:46 PM
It’s a gift…*sigh*…and a curse.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:46 PM
YES, Andrew Sullivan really did post that at The Daily Dish, his vile, perverted gossip site for The Atlantic.
Buy Danish on October 26, 2008 at 8:48 PM
Rezko is only mumbling now. He’s holding off on any arias until November 4 – when he HOPES the Messiah will be elected. Oh man, is he going to be one disappointed jailbird. On November 5 the opera begins.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:49 PM
Yeah, I agree. More broadly, though, the GOP needs to develop a comprehensive media strategy going forward to make sure this kind of crap never happens again. I have never in my adult life seen the media so transparently in the tank for a candidate as I have seen this election cycle. The bias is absolutely rank, and the media conspired with Obama in implementing the politics of personal destruction against Palin.
Outlander on October 26, 2008 at 8:49 PM
A most peculiar fellow, this trailboss.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:50 PM
I agree, and I’m wondering how the media paradigm will shift after McCain takes office. Their credibility will have been severely diminished.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:52 PM
Dont let it bother you Madison, at least they didnt yell “kill Obama” at a rally which is what really got the MSM upset…even though it didnt really happen. The fix is in.
I guess you werent able to understand my point. Why would I bet with a guy that has nothing to lose…you are already gone? too hard for you to understand I see…now I understand why you still think McCain is going to win the election.
But, if it makes you feel better….OK, sure thing, tiger, you got me there…good work tiger…wow…grrrrrr.
Roger Waters on October 26, 2008 at 8:52 PM
‘scuse me???
Oh…I get it…I was supposed to be OFFENDED!!!
Look here, big boy – I AM a real 6 pack woman. I hunt, I fish, I work in the mean ol’ “man’s world” of aircraft maintenance…and it sits just fine with ME.
uncivilized on October 26, 2008 at 8:52 PM
Dave is not so much a big boy as he is a very small man *wink*
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:56 PM
That was nothing. Did you hear some right-wing nut “reporter” went insane and started asking Joe Biden questions that didn’t focus on whether his chair was comfortable? Good lord, what a psycho!
Hopenchange.
MadisonConservative on October 26, 2008 at 8:57 PM
HUH???
Lemme see – Sarah Palin’s wardrobe will be donated to organizations that provide suitable business attire for poor women who are trying to enter the workforce. Obama’s styrofoam Tinker Toy set will be donated to – whom? The homeless? The styrofoam – deprived?
Honey, please tell me – what color is the sky on your home planet?
uncivilized on October 26, 2008 at 8:59 PM
I wonder when she begins her new stint as special correspondent to Bumfark, Idaho.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 8:59 PM
Nice response–the non-response. You framed the debate; you’re not entitled to change the subject.
BuckeyeSam on October 26, 2008 at 8:30 PM
Crickets from trailboss.
Conclusion: trailboss relegated to persona non grata.
I’ve learned my lesson. G’night all.
BuckeyeSam on October 26, 2008 at 9:00 PM
“HAIL SATAN” eh? Why should we be surprised? After all, Saul Alinsky dedicated Rules for Radicals to Lucifer:
Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins – or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer.
Buy Danish on October 26, 2008 at 9:01 PM
Re: Wedding rings
Neither my wife nor I wear ours’ anymore. It does bother me when writing (we’re both left handed) and I have my hands in electrically sensitive equipment on a daily basis, so conductive metal not only gets in the way, but is not safe around the equipment. Rather than risk losing it when setting it down, I’d rather just keep it at home in my dresser and wear it on special occasions (formal outings).
Re: Palin’s clothes, purchased by RNC members.
People are expected to look professional and the job of aides is to take care of matters that the candidates don’t have time to address. I imagine that it a common occurrence for any candidate that doesn’t have the personal means to be provided an appropriate wardrobe for the office. Its perfectly OK with me. As far as John Edwards spending $400 on haircuts; I’m not bent out of shape about that, if he can afford it. I just don’t think its that manly (not a ManlyRash) to be spending so much time on your hair. But, considering Edwards’ lack of faithfulness to Elizabeth, perhaps it isn’t his public appearance his worried about?
Re: Palin as a true “common person”. First, the MSM calls her a naive’ hick from the woods, and then they try to peg her as elitist for the wardrobe that the RNC bought for her to wear at her appearances…kind of like how they make Bush out to be some kind of evil genius that tricked the whole nation with some lie while simultaneously calling him a buffoon that couldn’t think his way out of a paper bag. Liberals are like the Greaes (the Greek mythic figures) that have to share a single eye between them, except that libtards end up sharing a few sparse braincells and often forget which invective they are utilizing on a conservative at the time.
Re: Peggy Noonan; everytime I hear her last name, I think of CaddyShack…noonan….noonan….NOONAN. Anyway, throw that rat (Peggy) overboard and good riddance.
Re: Hasselbeck; I don’t give any weight to what those ultra-liberal morons/entertainers that live in California/NY think and there are hundreds of them. So, why should I give her opinion any weight? I suppose I feel a little sorry for her that she has to live and work in that environment, so I guess I can cut her a break.
Fred Thompson for SCotUS
Palin for PotUS
Geministorm on October 26, 2008 at 9:01 PM
Actually its:
*theme from the Gay Men on Parade abruptly stops; Manly eats another twinkie, turns around in excitement and walks towards his “partner” David.*
* Manly says to David, I need another manly rush, David*
*10 minutes later, Manly spits on the carpet*
theme from Theme from Gay Men on Parade abrubtly ends. ManlyRush turns to his partner and asks for another “manly rush”. grrrrrrr
Roger Waters on October 26, 2008 at 9:01 PM
Sarah Palin is just what this country needs right now. Someone to cut through the bull, someone to fight for all Americans, and someone to get rid of the Washington insiders who are doing a lousy job. She may not have the foreign policy experience that McCain has, but she has more executive experience than Obama and Biden put together.
Vote McCain/Palin!!!
texasconserv on October 26, 2008 at 9:03 PM
g’night, Sam.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 9:03 PM
Yes, that was horrible.
Actually, it gave me a tad of hope that after a long drought, the American spirit MIGHT come back.
Roger Waters on October 26, 2008 at 9:04 PM
For a family of six??? (Now SEVEN, with Trig)
Crap, I’m not sure I could raise my three kids on that kind of money today…
uncivilized on October 26, 2008 at 9:06 PM
Revolting. I killed it after the first courus.
So that’s what sexism looks like these days.
Count to 10 on October 26, 2008 at 9:07 PM
Buy Danish on October 26, 2008 at 9:09 PM
Given the source, I’d say it’s more like vaginaphobia.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 9:09 PM
That’s not true. There are borderline socialist countries in Europe in which the unwashed masses are way better off than the unwashed masses in the US are. Of course, their nations are basically parasites who would die if their host died, but for now they’re better off than we are.
Darth Executor on October 26, 2008 at 9:13 PM
Why bother posting? It’s like advertising a mars bar on a mars bar.
Darth Executor on October 26, 2008 at 9:14 PM
…and this is a bad thing because…?
Endlessly entertaining – kind of a whine and cheese party, Dave brings the whine…
uncivilized on October 26, 2008 at 9:15 PM
Wow. Audio of Obama talking about how best to administer the redistribution of wealth, in a 2001 radio interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck
capitalist piglet on October 26, 2008 at 9:16 PM
How do you define “better off”?
Buy Danish on October 26, 2008 at 9:18 PM
Perhaps to counter those who enjoy advertising for Hershey’s Chocolate on a Mars Bar.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 9:20 PM
trailboss on October 26, 2008 at 8:42 PM
No answer should be given, as that would be none of your business. Truly weird that you would attack one’s character because of how they choose to spend their time. Makes me question your motive.
Keemo on October 26, 2008 at 9:21 PM
You know, it just occurred to me (I’m a bit slow…) – Rezko is waiting for the Messiah to win so he can slip him a full pardon under the table…(lightbulb comes on)
uncivilized on October 26, 2008 at 9:22 PM
Fiat Lux!
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 9:27 PM
That’s okay, Keemo. Something tells me that boy just ain’t right in the head.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 9:28 PM
He does his income redistribution thing in such a soft, sweet, seductively reassuring voice.
Here’s a very short video for you. :)
Buy Danish on October 26, 2008 at 9:30 PM
What a better reason to vote for McCain, than annoy the UN
ConservativePartyNow on October 26, 2008 at 9:30 PM
Um…I’ll take your word for it, BD. I just ate supper.
ManlyRash on October 26, 2008 at 9:31 PM
Man o’ man, she’s getting better and better every day. This is PRECISELY the cockey Sarah that we all love, and want in this campaign.
Does ANYONE THINK FOR A MINUTE THAT SHE WILL NOT BE OUR NOMINEE IN 2012???
I like Mitt Romney, but gosh darn, he doesn’t hold a candle to Sarah. She’s the BEST REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN OF ALL TIME!!
And Reagan? She’s 10 times better.
ericdondero on October 26, 2008 at 9:33 PM
Salon just published an interesting article by a GOP operative. He compares polling on black vs. white candidates and concludes that late undecideds break in greater numbers for the white candidate, regardless of the black candidate’s party.
Terrie on October 26, 2008 at 9:36 PM
Palin is really trying to win. It’s almost like she’s alone in her battle. She’s the huge draw, she gets Hasselbeck as another celebrity draw, she’s speaking her mind more now. If only she had a couple more months she might do it. I really can’t fault her for anything she’s done. Even the Couric questions were really convoluted. She could have skipped the interview, or treated her with disrespect and basically ignore her stupid questions.
McCain really stood up for her on Meet the Press this morning. He even said she doesn’t need defending, she’s doing great. Her image is tarnished, and I don’t know if she has time to repair it. She’s better qualified to be Prez than Obama is. I don’t know why more people don’t point that out.
Paul-Cincy on October 26, 2008 at 9:36 PM
Well, I just heard a report that early voting in Georgia is huge, with blacks voting in huge numbers, like 98% of blacks, and 98% of that 98% are voting for Obama. That is huge.
Paul-Cincy on October 26, 2008 at 9:38 PM
So, he thinks that is the hotest Halloween costume this year? When I first moved to LA, on Halloween, in broad day light, a guy, not unlike Andi Sullivan, decided his costume would be a dildo up his a$$ and secured by a string around his waist. He, of course, was arrested. The strange thing was this idiot could not see what was so offensive with the way he was dressed and acted totally indignant. That guy was Andrew Sullivan.
Blake on October 26, 2008 at 9:44 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »