Palin: Yes, of course Muslims are welcome in the party
posted at 3:45 pm on October 25, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
New from the American News Project, which earned enough goodwill from me for that clip of McCain supporters chasing away a crank that I’m willing to post this heavy-handed attempt to crank-ify the entire party just for the Palin footage. Normally this wouldn’t qualify as news, but such is the demonization of the campaign generally and of the ‘Cuda in particular that it’s worth flagging now for easy reference the next time she’s compared to a Nazi.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 Next »
Sweet little ride that, um, “reporter” is tooling around in.
KelliD on October 25, 2008 at 3:50 PM
well maybe not.
KelliD on October 25, 2008 at 3:51 PM
Not in my party.
KSgop on October 25, 2008 at 3:52 PM
People just aren’t going to get it until the first European nation is ripped apart and destroyed as Lebanon was.
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 3:53 PM
The fact that this is newsworthy is unbelievably depressing…..but the comments will be even worse.
crr6 on October 25, 2008 at 3:54 PM
I reject the premise of the question.
This is the problem with our ticket this year; they never challenge the premises of the questions they’re asked. Answering a bogus question without challenging the premise, no matter what your answer is, affirms the premise.
Lehosh on October 25, 2008 at 3:55 PM
As long as they are conservatives.
Valiant on October 25, 2008 at 3:55 PM
Good for Palin.
V15J on October 25, 2008 at 3:55 PM
Golly Allah- did you happen to post this because it appealed to you as an……atheist?
You know, let’s get the religion out of the GOP?
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 3:56 PM
Right, no moderates in this party anymore…good luck winning a national election with no moderates/moderate viewpoints.
The center decides our elections. Reagan democrats were centrists…Clinton won on a centrist approach…Bush was supposed to be a “compassionate conservative” (centrist)…
The first party to kick out moderates/muslims/whathaveyou is the first to lose
ernesto on October 25, 2008 at 3:57 PM
LOL! Wanna bet?
Muslim Republicans and the GOP
Fletch54 on October 25, 2008 at 3:57 PM
Exactly.
The premise of the question is purely from the Left.
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 3:58 PM
Mikey Moore style “reporting”.
jgapinoy on October 25, 2008 at 3:58 PM
And Americans.
AZCoyote on October 25, 2008 at 3:58 PM
Reagan democrats may have been centrist, but he wasn’t. It was the full blown conservative message that pulled the Reagan Democrats right and not Reagan’s centrism.
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 3:59 PM
Smart cookie, that Sarah Palin. The U.S. is still about freedom of religion, like it or not. It’s always safest, although sometimes uncomfortable, to stick with the facts.
Scotsman on October 25, 2008 at 4:01 PM
More than that. Reagan pulled the Republican party to the right. For the forty years before that, Republicans had been Democrats, only they promised better administration of the Great Society.
Lehosh on October 25, 2008 at 4:02 PM
Here’s my take:
1. Political parties in the U.S. are not religious parties. Separation of church and state (yes, I know that phrase is not in the Constitution) means absolute individual religious freedom, but no established state religion, including Christianity.
2. Islam is not Christianity and never will be.
3. If it is to be taken seriously, Islam desperately needs a Reformation so that its 14th Century interpretations no longer hold sway.
4. As a social and fiscal conservative, I can work with any other social and fiscal conservative without needing him/her to be of my faith.
Bottom line, the Republican party should open its arms to all conservatives.
Funny, except for Sarah Palin, the interviewers didn’t find a single conservative who was even thoughtful on the topic. Nicely biased selection!
MochaLite on October 25, 2008 at 4:02 PM
There’s no reason you can’t be a muslim and support the party platform. Freedom and low taxes is an appealing message.
lodge on October 25, 2008 at 4:03 PM
Not all Muslims are Islamofascists. The Muslim in the video seemed cool–I’d work with him…but if our conversation turned to religion, I’d tell him, in a polite way, that Muhammed was a false prophet.
jgapinoy on October 25, 2008 at 4:03 PM
This is the attitude that costs the GOP elections and support. Dear gawd…
JetBoy on October 25, 2008 at 4:03 PM
Those conservative Muslims any relation to these conservative Muslim groups in the UK?
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 4:03 PM
The American political backlash against Muslims, where it exists, in both parties, is a symptom of the great propaganda success of the World’s Muslim extremists (e.g. Osama bin Laden, Hamas, Hezbollah, etc.) who would say that you can’t have Islam without Sharia Law, and you can’t have Islam without theocratic religious government. It would help a lot if American Muslims would be more vociferous in saying, “none of that is true. We don’t want Sharia Law and we don’t want Mullahs in our government.” Americans only hear one Muslim viewpoint, and it’s not the good kind.
RBMN on October 25, 2008 at 4:04 PM
All are welcome.
Cindy Munford on October 25, 2008 at 4:07 PM
I bet the large Christian majority that once existed in Lebanon thought the same thing. We should ask one provided we can find a Christian.
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 4:07 PM
COUNTER QUESTION:
ARE TRUE CHRISTIANS WELCOME IN THE DEMOCRAT PARTY?
Or do they only welcome “christians in name only” who do not believe that Christ is The Truth The Way And The Life?
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:07 PM
OT: If any Twin Cities area Minnesotans are interested in talking to or questioning Norm Coleman, he is going to be at a restaurant in St. Michael on Monday.
Bishop on October 25, 2008 at 4:09 PM
It’s a stupid question and Palin should have kicked the guy in the teeth for asking it.
Bishop on October 25, 2008 at 4:11 PM
Muslim extremists, just like Christian extremists should not be welcome in any party. This country was founded on religious freedom and those who practice Islam, Christianity, or Atheism for that matter shouldn’t be excluded as long as they treat people with respect and equality.
whtabtbill on October 25, 2008 at 4:12 PM
How can you really gauge a muslim’s true intent? Islam teaches and encourages the act of taqiah (lying/misleading)for their cause. How do you know truth from lies when koranic prescribed deceit embedded in the belief system is in play? I assume every muslim is a serial liar, or at least has the capacity to be one if pressed to make a choice between their religion and the nation they calim citizenship to.
Fletch54 on October 25, 2008 at 4:12 PM
That’s the first time I have heard of mass murder referred to as propaganda. You might also take the time to explain to me in what way the extemists deviate from Islamic doctrine?
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 4:14 PM
To be fair, I think KelliD was replying to her own post, not to Palin.
RINO in Name Only on October 25, 2008 at 4:14 PM
A Muslim extremist wages jihad against all infidels.
What exactly does a “Christian extremist” do?
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:14 PM
***the DEMOCRATIC PARTY told voters to vote against Memphis rep Steven Cohen because he “is an anti-CHristian JEW!”
***the DEMOCRATIC PARTY’S DNC WEBSITE told voters to fear potential eric cantor vp because “He is Jewish”
***the DEMOCRATIC PARTY attacked Norm Coleman because he is a “jew”
ah yes, but let’s blame the party whose voters sent million$ in clothing, money, and food to MUSLIM indonesian tsunami victims back in december 2004
i swear, palin could throw herself on the ground and pray eastward to mecca and the MOO-(love the ‘correct’ pronunciation, sheesh, palin didnt even understand him), and the MOOslim interviewer would still think the GOP is a bunch of “CHRISTIANISTS”
its no wonder b.o. is going to be elected, look at this crazy citizen interviewer.
where was he with the DNC’s Jew-bashing all summer long?
oops! tolerance for me, not for you, huh?
battleoflepanto1571 on October 25, 2008 at 4:15 PM
making that distinction with regards to political affiliation is frankly disgusting. take your faith based dichotomies to the 12th century. freak.
ernesto on October 25, 2008 at 4:16 PM
Fletch54 did you read the linked article, and if you did then I’m not sure what our difference of opinion is?
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 4:16 PM
Writes letters to the newspaper editor about local movie theaters letting 14 year olds into “R” rated movies.
battleoflepanto1571 on October 25, 2008 at 4:16 PM
FiveWays, I have to say that several good friends of mine are real, heart Christians and Democrats at the same time. They just honestly think more of Jesus’ teachings about caring for the poor than they do about individual salvation; and they think that government is the better administrator of society’s care for the poor than are individual citizens.
As a sister in Christ, I can’t argue with their belief that following Jesus means caring for the poor. The only argument that makes any headway with them is the efficiency argument: $1.00 sent from me to Washington returns to the poor in my state as $0.60. Government really does suck at administering charity! Further, government employees (Pelosi, Reed, Frank, Biden, Obama) end up taking our money to ensure their own power. It’s that simple.
MochaLite on October 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 4:14 PM
Although I probably agree with RBMN that the few are speaking for the many but somebody better start talking. It’s kind of hard to support anonymous.
Cindy Munford on October 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM
They actively court the religion nuts on a national scale. People like Gingrich, McCain, and Lieberman cozy up to jackasses like Hagee. Their black strategy has always been through the megachurches. This born again craze has actively helped the dumbing down of Republican values and instead of fervently supporting limited government values it has become a cult of personality approach to politics just like the New Progressives on the left are with Obama. Some Republican strategies of late, with Hagee being a great example, makes Huckabee’s exploitation of his “faith” look harmless. Compassionate conservatism appears to be incoherent and rambling statism.
LevStrauss on October 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM
Why don’t you give give us some examples of Christian extremists, and how the government, and society their efforts?
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM
This is just another sad attempt to portray the GOP as a party of racists. Thay are trying to create a characture of your “typical” conservative and in turn are attempting to turn that characture against Palin. To me this just demonstrates how fearful they are of Sarah Palin and the way she connects with a broad range of the american people and the positive momentum she’s bringing to the party.
lwssdd on October 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM
So that would be a….NO?
“faith based dichotomies to the 12th century”?
Does Christianity have a “new” meaning in the 21 century?
Did they just add a Gospel recently?
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM
As I said before. I know many Muslims. Four friends are for McCain. Then there is my Christian friends from Iraq, a few from Iran. They want McCain. Then a few for third party. They feel NObama is not ready for this job. That is all they said. Which is how I feel, but other reasons also. So, who knows. Our Country gives us all freedom of Religion, speech, and so on. That will change if NObama gets in office.
sheebe on October 25, 2008 at 4:19 PM
Talking about parties not letting in “true christians” or parties being the party of “true christians” is the exact kind of division that the phrase “separation of church and state” is meant to curtail. its disgusting to see these sorts of definitions thrown around when talking about party affiliation or governance. Its my biggest beef with the republican party…that its somehow the party of “christians” and the other isnt. It leads to terrible choices and bad government. its disgusting.
ernesto on October 25, 2008 at 4:21 PM
This thread isn’t here to debate the vagaries of fundamentalism or the comparative merits of Islam and Christianity. Please stay on topic.
Allahpundit on October 25, 2008 at 4:21 PM
Ya, these people who are wouldn’t vote for a muslim are the same people we saw who were anti Mitt Romney because of his religion.
Is it easy to find these people? Yes. Do they really represent the majority of conservative thought? No.
Good job to Sarah, but you can tell the reporter already had his report written before he asked people the questions.
Conservative Voice on October 25, 2008 at 4:22 PM
Sorry fixed it.
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 4:22 PM
LevStrauss on October 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM
That seems pretty broad. I am a believer in Christ but not of Church. And pretty soon the only people who will have any idea of our founding history will be the religious nuts who decide they can no longer support the lies of the public school system. I think attacking their intelligence is a little harsh.
Cindy Munford on October 25, 2008 at 4:24 PM
Did Rome have a welfare system that focibly took money from the population to assist the “poor” in Christ’s time?
Would Christ agree to a State ran welfare system that is wracked by corruption?
Would Christ agree to a nanny-state whose taxation without representation CREATES more poverty than it cures?
Would Christ agree that the most innocent of life- are those whose lives began at conception and who cannot speak for themselves?
What do your “christian Democrat” friends say to these questions?
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:24 PM
Great example!
LevStrauss on October 25, 2008 at 4:24 PM
I have nothing against Muslims. I have muslim friends. I’m also a Christian, and turned down attending Friday prayers at a mosque because I didn’t think it was right for me to do that. No hard feelings either way, and surprise, surprise, life goes on between us just fine.
However, I have an overwhelmingly negative view of “ISLAM”. That’s not a problem, and I can separate the two.
I’d vote for any Muslim who I agree with on policy (I really want McCain to pick Zalmay Kalizad to be SecState — hes an afghan, current UN ambassador from USA… smart as a whip, and yes, Muslim), but it’s hard because I am anti-sharia, and the Keith Ellisons of the world are too ambiguous about the role of Sharia, the place of CAIR, the “cultural uniqueness” of honor killings (as oppposed to being plain mass murder), and so on.
If that makes me “Racist” (funny becuase I didn’t know “muslim” was a racial box you check when you take the SAT), so be it!
battleoflepanto1571 on October 25, 2008 at 4:25 PM
I didn’t bring Christian fundamentalists into this. He did:
I simply replied to his statement, but you addressed me. Is it unacceptable to defend Christians?
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 4:25 PM
“Is there something wrong with being a Muslim…?” wonders Colin Powell.
Asked by the man who clearly never read the Koran. (A ‘book’ shorter than the New Testament.)
And a guy who chooses race over any other qualification for President.
Powell, and the interviewer for this clip, might want to know that Islam is an anti-Constitutional subversive movement to establish a global theoractic tyranny.
That is Mohammadism’s self-declared Goal: A One World ‘Holy’ Despotism.
But then who expects our politicians to be anything but willfully and woefully uninformed about the most dangerous Ideology our nation ever faced.
They’re too busy smiling to learn.
profitsbeard on October 25, 2008 at 4:26 PM
So Christ said upon this rock I build my “………”?
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:26 PM
Better yet, look at the records of the people you vote for and see where they fall on the issue. That’s better than “just words”.
LevStrauss on October 25, 2008 at 4:27 PM
How is this off topic?
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:28 PM
It never ends,
they bash Mitt,
they bash Christians!
The Liberal leftards just don’t give up,they play the
Race Card,they play the Religion Card!
———————————————————–
Here’s the bottom line,at this present time of this election
the left,the Obama Team,want to DIVIDE the Republican Team!
All say it again,Team Republican is UNITED,and they know it!
Team Liberal campaign is in a mess,they are not UNITED,
they weren’t in unity before DNConvention in Denver,and
they certainly are not in unity now!!!!
Don’t fall into their trap!!!!
canopfor on October 25, 2008 at 4:28 PM
They’d say Jesus himself said more about being humble and giving up all your worldly possessions to others. loving everyone (gays, muslims, liberals) and giving up everything you can for them.
Jesus said, “blessed be the meek, for they shall inherit the earth”
Has Rush been meek? or Dobson? or Fallwell or Robertson?
Jesus himself would be telling us to lay down all our weapons and turn the other cheek to Osama Bin Laden. Jesus would pray to his Father to forgive Osama.
And this is why religion has no place in government or policy or politics…because when you actually look at it…running government on biblical principles is pretty much impossible. Republicans ignore the 1/2 of the bible (sermon on the mount, great commandment) and Democrats ignore the other 1/2.
religion has no place in government. none.
ernesto on October 25, 2008 at 4:29 PM
freedom of religion. Gov Palin answered it well. We do not discrimate on the basis of race, religion, sexual orientation. We may not agree with what you say or with what you pray or who you sleep with but we will defend your right to say it, screw it and to pray to it with our life while at the same time argueing with you that you are wrong.
unseen on October 25, 2008 at 4:29 PM
Goodbye forever, Hot Air. It was fun while it lasted.
I am sick of the defeatism in every single post by Morrissey and Allahpundit. See ya…..
indythinker on October 25, 2008 at 4:29 PM
It’s extremist Muslims we’re worried about here, not all Muslims.
Don’t let the door hit ya on the way out, bud.
malan89 on October 25, 2008 at 4:32 PM
Gee wiz,10 days before D-Day,and the Muslim angle pops up!!
The Left are waiting for some really stupid people,
on certain blogs,to make some really stupid,and dis
parging remarks about Muslims!!!!
Don’t get suckered!
canopfor on October 25, 2008 at 4:33 PM
Oh the irony. Sick of defeatism, so you “give up”…
JetBoy on October 25, 2008 at 4:33 PM
LoL.
Ignore my earlier comment. Judging from this thread, Mrs. Palin didn’t need to challenge the premise of the question. The premise is entirely valid.
P.S. – I like where this thread is going: on a bullet-train to Rethuglikkkan Stereotype Land.
Lehosh on October 25, 2008 at 4:34 PM
I can give you that, but it’s the attempt to remove Christian values from the society that is disturbing.
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 4:35 PM
Really? When will the Christian, Barrack Obama be giving up his worldy possessions to others?
And we are required to love everyone. But we are NOT required to love their beliefs nor their actions.
Is Obama “meek” ?
Jesus would be telling us to lay down our weapons to Bin Laden? He would tell us to let Islam slaughter us? Really?
Is NO WAR justified?
Religion hasn’t invaded government; Government has invaded religion.
Would Christ tell us to turn the other cheek on abortion?
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:35 PM
Backlash for Sarah saying that Muslims are welcome in the Republican Party? What backlash?
I tell you, just the way that libs go about asking questions proves their view of conservatives is a caricature.
Queen0fCups on October 25, 2008 at 4:35 PM
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:26 PM
I mean a specific church. Non-denominational Christian church is my preference. To much experience with one faction bad mouthing another over stupid stuff that doesn’t make any difference.
Cindy Munford on October 25, 2008 at 4:36 PM
go to:
http://www.hedgehogreport.com (the comments)
and read
http://www.stolenthunder.blogspot.com
they perk me up… most of these polls are TRASH… assuming that historical turnout (usually R+1 point or even D+1 point, got so bad it was D by +3 points turnout in 2006, the best year for dems in forever), these state polls are using spreads like… D+15 for state polls.
WTF! that assumes like TEN MILLION REPUBLICANS said “yeah, i’ll stay a republican even after mark foley text messages little boys, and stay a gop after conrad burns and abramoff, and stay a gop after iraq and bush and macaca and pork and corruption and immigration……..BUT, i will magically become an ‘O’-voting dem in the last nine months”
BOGUS!
lots of egg on the faces of media early am nov 5th. mac will win!
battleoflepanto1571 on October 25, 2008 at 4:37 PM
I love it when dumbass atheists pretend to know what they’re talking about. Thanks for continuing to remind me why I don’t take you people seriously.
Darth Executor on October 25, 2008 at 4:38 PM
Is it? I count maybe four or five commenters here who are sympathetic to it. Everyone else is against.
Allahpundit on October 25, 2008 at 4:38 PM
Excuse me sir, but Conservative does NOT mean Bible believer. Being a Conservative has nothing to do with religion; it has to do with ideology and which principles you believe this nation should be governed under. Are there more Christians who are Conservative than Liberal? Of course, but that doesn’t mean if you’re not a Christian, you’re not a true Conservative.
For the record, I’m a Christian Conservative Republican.
nickj116 on October 25, 2008 at 4:38 PM
Perhaps, but that four or five are certainly the loudest.
It is easy to see where the stereotype comes from in any case. I suppose I still believe the premise is basically false, but it’s clearer now that it’s not an unreasonable one.
Lehosh on October 25, 2008 at 4:40 PM
huh?
***the DEMOCRATIC PARTY told voters to vote against Memphis rep Steven Cohen because he “is an anti-CHristian JEW!”
***the DEMOCRATIC PARTY’S DNC WEBSITE told voters to fear potential eric cantor vp because “He is Jewish”
***the DEMOCRATIC PARTY attacked Norm Coleman because he is a “jew”
ah yes, but let’s blame the party whose voters sent million$ in clothing, money, and food to MUSLIM indonesian tsunami victims back in december 2004
i swear, palin could throw herself on the ground and pray eastward to mecca and muslim interviewer would still think the GOP is a bunch of “CHRISTIANISTS”
where was he with the DNC’s Jew-bashing all summer long?
battleoflepanto1571 on October 25, 2008 at 4:42 PM
Ok, now that someone has brought it up, I would like to discuss this very saying. What do you think is being said here? I’m not so sure that inheriting the earth is necessarily a good thing. Isn’t our treasure to be in heaven? Why would we want to inherit the earth?
Just asking.
Queen0fCups on October 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM
If any party wants to play the “Labeling Game”,it the
Liberal Democratic Party!
Good Lord,Obama is still stuck in the past,and he wants to remind every American,every day they are to!
At this stage of the election,the angle of Religion in
who’s party has already been dealt with!
This will be another ‘Socialist Tactic’ to distract,
and impune another party during this election!
I really thought that the poisonous venom of politics
wouldn’t go this far!!
Attack politically where it should be,Team Obama for
this kind of sh#t!!
canopfor on October 25, 2008 at 4:44 PM
If Nazism were just beginning today, and it hadn’t broken the borders of Germany yet, or committed mass murder. Could you call it evil? Could you resist it or would that just be stereotyping because not all Nazis wanted to kill jews.
Islam is easier to judge than Nazism. It has already committed genocide in India and around the world.
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 4:46 PM
But why were the Pharisees and Herodians hypocrites?
Because they belonged to a state who’s head (Ceasar) was also a “god”. They embraced the “god” of the state, and rejected the Son of God.
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:47 PM
Aren’t they always, though?
Yeah, no question the right (like the left) has its share of cranks. Ed and I must get 10 e-mails a day about the Obama birth certificate stuff. It’s sad, but it’s not majority opinion. This site wouldn’t have the traffic it does if it was.
Allahpundit on October 25, 2008 at 4:47 PM
Listen, I have problems with the people who propagate this nonsense, the leaders of these movements. Cattle are harmless animals. If people take offense when one says that people do not rise from the dead after being killed and crucified, or “God” did not give Moses little stone tablets, or “Allah” did not speak to Mohammad unless he was on something then that is their own problem. Alcoholics use alcohol to drink away their insecurities and anxieties, cattle use ghost stories and as long as people keep it to themselves I don’t care.
LevStrauss on October 25, 2008 at 4:48 PM
Good for her. Moderate, normal Islam is quite conservative in nature, and the fact that they’re Americans indicates that they appreciate capitalism and freedom. Why not reach out to them and welcome them, when we’re their natural party?
We need all the Muslims and Jews and anything else we can get. We can’t win with only Christians, unless someone can get half the Christians to stop voting Democrat.
Tanya on October 25, 2008 at 4:48 PM
Godwin in… 81 posts? Good going.
Lehosh on October 25, 2008 at 4:48 PM
Allahpundit on October 25, 2008 at 4:47 PM
If Gov Palin is the head of the party in 2012 will you do a Buckley. Please say you will.
unseen on October 25, 2008 at 4:50 PM
Wouldn’t I be required to call you a Nazi, for Godwin to be in effect? I asked a question. The question was, if you lived in a time when Nazism existed but had committed no overt acts of agression would it be discriminatory to consider the ideology evil?
DFCtomm on October 25, 2008 at 4:52 PM
Yes. Because I could point to Mein Kampf, which is to Nazism what Das Capitalis to Marxism.
ManlyRash on October 25, 2008 at 4:52 PM
For you? Anything, pal.
Allahpundit on October 25, 2008 at 4:52 PM
Cf Psalm 37:11,”. . . the meek shall possess the land.” In the psalm “the land” means the land of Palestine; here it means the kingdom.
Psalm 37:11 “But the poor will possess the land, will delight in great prosperity.”
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:53 PM
Allahpundit on October 25, 2008 at 4:52 PM
Good, your extreme moderation is annoying.
unseen on October 25, 2008 at 4:56 PM
Is that your version of “Freedom of Religion”?
Or is that “Freedom FROM Religion”?
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:56 PM
LevStrauss on October 25, 2008 at 4:48 PM
I have no problem with you being a non-believer but you can’t deny that our founders were. And they did a remarkable job of making sure that all people would be included. Maybe it isn’t you intent but instead of debating whether there should inclusion you want to insult those already here. Can you not stand with believers and fight for the Constitution?
Cindy Munford on October 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM
Pish-posh. You will do the right thing and stay here and continue to challenge conventional wisdom. Too many dullards here don’t understand that muscle cannot increase in bulk unless it pushes against something.
ManlyRash on October 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM
Ha. As an epitaph, one can do worse than that.
Allahpundit on October 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM
Want to know why the Liberals are running away with this election?
Just look at this “Right-Wing” thread.
Christians are being told to shut up.
Enough said………
FiveWays on October 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM
Good for her…..
Tanya on Oct 25,2008 at 4:48PM.
Tanya:Of course Muslims are welcome in the Republican Party!
What Team Obama wants is a negative comment from
SarahCuda,or any high-ranking Republican,so they
can have a political ad as to how much the party
dissilikes that said religion!
Things must be getting desperate for Obama!
canopfor on October 25, 2008 at 4:58 PM
ManlyRash on October 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM
You can not increase muscle bulk by pushing against jello
unseen on October 25, 2008 at 4:58 PM
That man at the end, scares the living crap out of me. Contrary to what he might believe, the Republican Party had zero to do with any particular religion at all.
Using his Methods, we’d have to exclude Catholics, Jews, and any other sort of Religion.
Kinda of reminds me of a video, that I posted to my Blog.
Click here to watch “Crawford“.
It’s an hour and 15 minutes long. It almost made me cry.
I highly recommend it.
I guess with this comment, I’m letting the cat outta the bag, of who I really am.
*meow*
LibertarianConservative on October 25, 2008 at 4:58 PM
Queen0fCups on October 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM
Translation: Yeah, when you’re dead your going to get all this great stuff so stay docile while your on this side.
LevStrauss on October 25, 2008 at 4:58 PM
Another day, another angry atheist. *yawn*
ManlyRash on October 25, 2008 at 4:58 PM
Allahpundit on October 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM
Well we can always say you cut a mean figure on the fence post.
unseen on October 25, 2008 at 5:00 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 Next »