Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Pakistan aims for an Awakening

posted at 11:00 am on October 23, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

The Pakistani government has taken a new step in asserting itself in the lawless tribal regions on its border with Afghanistan.  They have armed anti-Taliban tribal fighters, known as lashkars, with AK-47s and given them free rein to conduct operations against the Islamist radicals.  The Gilani government in Islamabad wants to emulate the Awakening movement in Iraq by building a grassroots effort against terrorism:

Pakistan plans to arm tens of thousands of anti-Taliban tribal fighters in its western border region in hopes — shared by the U.S. military — that the nascent militias can replicate the tribal “Awakening” movement that proved decisive in the battle against al-Qaeda in Iraq.

The militias, called lashkars, will receive Chinese-made AK-47 assault rifles and other small arms, a purchase arranged during a visit to Beijing this month by Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari, Pakistani officials said.

Many Bush administration officials remain skeptical of Pakistan’s long-term commitment to fighting the Taliban, al-Qaeda and other extremist groups ensconced in the mountains near the border with Afghanistan. But the decision to arm the lashkars, which emerged as organized fighting forces only in the past few months, is one of several recent actions that have led the Pentagon to believe that the Pakistani effort has become more aggressive.

Undoubtedly, this will help in the federally-administered tribal areas (FATAs) like the Waziristans and the NWFP.  The lashkars already have almost 30,000 men ready to fight, and the Taliban has already taken notice of them.  They have begun to conduct suicide operations against the lashkars and have beheaded eight of them in the last few weeks.  Until now, the lashkars used old weapons with little firepower, but the AK-47s will help close the firepower gap with the Taliban and al-Qaeda.

There are some significant differences between Iraq and Pakistan on this issue, though.  The central government has almost no presence in the FATAs, and the tribal mix is more complicated.  In Iraq, most of the destruction came from outsiders brought into the Sunni areas by AQ, whereas in Pakistan, most of the combatants are natives.  This Awakening will look less like a grassroots police action than a civil war, or perhaps more accurately, a tribal war pitting Pashtuns against everyone else in the region.

Pakistan needs to assert its sovereignty in the FATAs if it hopes to end the fighting, and not just militarily.  People in the FATAs have grave concerns about food and infrastructure security, which tends to create more radicals.  Unfortunately, as in Afghanistan, this becomes a vicious-cycle problem, because one cannot build food security and infrastructure while radicals target everything in sight, and the lack of food security creates more radicals.

In Iraq, we broke the cycle by putting a dominant military presence on the ground.  Pakistan eventually will have to do the same thing, or have someone else do it for them.  Given the mountainous terrain and the isolation of the tribes in these regions, that’s going to be a very difficult proposition.  Until then, perhaps the lashkars can get lucky and take out the Taliban/AQ leadership by reaching where government troops cannot.  A similar strategy worked for us in 2001 with the Northern Alliance.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

BO says forget all the “Awakening” stuff. Just send a bunch of Tomahawk missiles, drop some smart bombs, & invade.

jgapinoy on October 23, 2008 at 10:39 AM

I think a virus has been injected into the BORG

tomas on October 23, 2008 at 10:39 AM

The word ‘token’ springs to mind for some reason.

Vashta.Nerada on October 23, 2008 at 10:39 AM

It gets easier to put in a “dominating military presence” if you have gotten both sides to kill each other off before hand.

MarkTheGreat on October 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM

But if ACORN registers AQ members as tribesmen….?

AubieJon on October 23, 2008 at 10:46 AM

When does America put all the lashkars on paycheques?

Dumbasses believing Mohammedans.

BL@KBIRD on October 23, 2008 at 10:51 AM

Feh. I think we should follow Teh One’s plan on this one.

/sarc

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on October 23, 2008 at 10:51 AM

Cavemen with modern weapons.

Bishop on October 23, 2008 at 10:54 AM

Best of luck to them, but it still doesn’t solve the problem of Pakistan’s ISI in part helping the Taliban. Gawd what an ugly mess that is. The only thing that could make it worse is a large, overt attack on the area by the US. Good thing Dear Leader Obamassiah doesn’t advocate that. Oh, wait, he does.

rbj on October 23, 2008 at 10:54 AM

I think they are culturally predisposed to the type of government they have. Making Pakistan like, lets say Turkey would take a generation. A generation of concerted effort and consistent leadership.

Theworldisnotenough on October 23, 2008 at 10:54 AM

A similar strategy worked for us in 2001 with the Northern Alliance.

The radio network? Holy moly, Ed, I didn’t think NARN reached all the way into Pakistan. :-)

ManlyRash on October 23, 2008 at 11:01 AM

**rubs eyes**

Heck I am not awake as of yet, and Pakistany people have been up for hours.

As for Pakistan doing much if anything…. that will be something to wait and see about. I say NO U.S. Military allowed, unless we are allowed to go after the Terrorists. Period!

upinak on October 23, 2008 at 11:15 AM

This seems like a terribly bad idea. We will all regret this a few years down the road, I think.

This is nothing like the dynamic that existed in Anbar with the Sunni Awakening. In that case, the militias were slowly drawn closer to the central government and the rule of law. They were utilized as a civilian police force.

In Pakistan, there appears to be no attempt to bring the Lashkars closer in alignment to the rule of law. The government is simply passing out weapons to raise the level of chaos. No wonder Washington is not leaping to help out.

blueguitarbob on October 23, 2008 at 11:15 AM

Terrrain is the only difference between Iraq and Pakistan.

tomas on October 23, 2008 at 11:20 AM

The Awakening wouldn’t have worked without the Surge and vice versa. Too bad That One doesn’t believe in surges. Oh wait, he’s all for a surge in the Hindu Kush? Oh, OK.

Kafir on October 23, 2008 at 11:21 AM

upinak on October 23, 2008 at 11:15 AM

Mornin’ sunshine!

ManlyRash on October 23, 2008 at 11:22 AM

ManlyRash on October 23, 2008 at 11:22 AM

Whats sunshine?

upinak on October 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM

Whats sunshine?

upinak on October 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM

That’s the bright thing in the sky that you see for a couple of hours each year during the summer.

MarkTheGreat on October 23, 2008 at 11:27 AM

That’s the bright thing in the sky that you see for a couple of hours each year during the summer.

MarkTheGreat on October 23, 2008 at 11:27 AM

Oh that is BOB… Big Orange Ball.

upinak on October 23, 2008 at 11:28 AM

This is a “teachable” moment about Islam……

Pakistan, the Land of the Pure, was partitioned from India to allow the noble Muhammadans freedom from the kaffir Hindus to grow an Islamic paradise. The “inferior to Muslim” Hindus have just sent a rocket to survey the moon. The creatures of wonder have just bought Chinese rifles to arm their hillbilly headchoppers. The same people, two different beliefs. It is what Islam does to people.

BL@KBIRD on October 23, 2008 at 11:39 AM

upinak on October 23, 2008 at 11:28 AM

You have mail.

ManlyRash on October 23, 2008 at 11:42 AM

It gets easier to put in a “dominating military presence” if you have gotten both sides to kill each other off before hand.

MarkTheGreat on October 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM

True, but I’m not sure where the results on that fall when one injects military hardware into the equation.
But, perhaps…

Count to 10 on October 23, 2008 at 11:47 AM

The Awakening wouldn’t have worked without the Surge and vice versa. Too bad That One doesn’t believe in surges. Oh wait, he’s all for a surge in the Hindu Kush? Oh, OK.

Kafir on October 23, 2008 at 11:21 AM

Doesn’t quite work both ways: X would not have happened at all without the declaration of Y, but Y would only have been less effective without X.

Count to 10 on October 23, 2008 at 11:51 AM

Heck I am not awake as of yet, and Pakistany people have been up for hours.

upinak on October 23, 2008 at 11:15 AM

I’m not sure about the time zones, but I think the people of Pakistan may have been asleep for several hours by the time you got up.

Count to 10 on October 23, 2008 at 11:54 AM

Cavemen with modern weapons.

Bishop on October 23, 2008 at 10:54 AM

…a very nifty idea from the comfort of a swivel chair, but a very scary thing on the ground….

hard to manage, this arming tribesmen to kill off other tribesmen….

…the old saw about “He may be a son-of-a-bitch, but he’s our son-of-a-bitch” grows thin and wrinkly, and gets both embarrasing and costly unless you’ve got someone with the morals of a car thief and the smarts of an ace pimp to keep an eye on things…I’m not sure we’ve got that anymore….

…and I’m certain that Mr. Obama’s not going to bring anyone or any ones of that caliber into the fight…his background would suggest that he’s of the Clinton mold, which states that lawyers can protect us from the nasty man, should he rear his ugly head (or head his ugly rear)….

…it’s a bad business. Ho Chi Minh was somebody’s proxy at one point….

America’s just not as good at guerilla war as it thinks that it is…remember Mr. Stinson’s idiotic pronouncement that gentlemen don’t read eachother’s mail….

…every time we mount an unconventional op, some conventional bozo — in uniform or some suit somewhere — wants ‘em to shave their beards, start wearing uniforms, and bristles at the sloppy paperwork….

Still, if it’s handled even half-assed well, it’s better to have bad guys killing bad guys.

General Crook learned in the 1880’s that it takes an Apache to catch and Apache. General Nelson Miles — the ultimate ring-knocking conventional military type and a throughgoing self-promoting moron — replaced Crook, threw out his successful methods, and went after Apaches with loads of troops, communicating using heliographs and equipped with latest gear…and stumbled back into garrison torn up by the terrain and whipped. One quarter of the standing US Army was chasing, effectively, about 35 warriors with about 70 dependents, oldsters, and kids.

In the end, we need to manage this thing…or enable it in such a way that we have some oversight.

It always sounds like a nifty idea, but unconventional warfare is about as hard to manage as shovelling sand…with a pitchfork.

Puritan1648 on October 23, 2008 at 12:02 PM

Not to worry, President Obama will take care of this once in office – - he told us so.

Rick on October 23, 2008 at 12:20 PM

I’ve been thinking about just this sort of thing for a while (see here, and more recently, here). I agree that, while a promising sort of development, there is a large number of things which have to go just right for the Lashkars to evolve into anything Awakening-like.

As AQI continues to be decimated, its cause shown again and again to be hopelessly lost, then we may see more and more Jihadi-wannabes heeding the call to flock to the Af-Pak theater rather than Iraq. Naturally, this would be a boon to the Iraqi people, who would finally have the breathing space to grow their economy and solidify their government. This in turn could very well create the conditions for a more rapid redeployment of US troops to pursue other missions.

At the same time, though, the relatively massive influx of foreign fighters who would suddenly rush to support the Taliban/AQ axis could help to create the conditions for the COIN operations which could defeat them. The tribes of the rugged lands bordering Afghanistan and Pakistan are a fiercely independent and notoriously xenophobic lot. If recent history is any indication, these newly-arrived Jihadis will, in fairly short order, conduct themselves in as abominable a manner as they have wherever they have planted their blighted feet. I cannot imagine that, over time, this will sit well with the indigenous tribes. More Lashkars may form, which could over time become a more organized (and well-armed) set of “friendly” militias, given the presence of a more well-manned, concerted force, ably directed by Gen. Petraeus from his new perch atop CENTCOM.

I know, “I’m smelling a lot of ‘if’ coming off this plan.” Much depends on the predominantly Arab foreigners streaming into the Tribal lands conducting themselves in a sufficiently horrid way as to override the powerful hospitality mores and traditional respect for Arabs (as the progenitors of Islam) which prevail in the region. But it strikes me as a plausible scenario, if the situation is as adroitly read and exploited as our pre-eminent warrior-scholar was able to do in the Land of the Two Rivers.

Noocyte on October 23, 2008 at 12:40 PM

I don’t really care how lawless and chaotic the Taliban controlled areas are as long as there is an armed group to keep their focus away from Afghanistan.

I like this move by Pakistan, for the short term anyway.

BadgerHawk on October 23, 2008 at 12:48 PM

A similar strategy worked for us in 2001 with the Northern Alliance.

While it’s true the Northern Alliance helped us in Afghanistan in 2001, I still seeth over the fact the Northern Alliance struck a deal with OBL/AQ and let them slip out the back door into the Pakistan tribal regions when we had them over a barrel in Tora Bora!

I will never forget this and neither should our military commanders and political leaders!

Liberty or Death on October 23, 2008 at 1:20 PM

Which Mohammedans are the good ones to trust again?

BL@KBIRD on October 23, 2008 at 2:45 PM

The Northern Alliance worked?? What are you smoking Ed?

The US made sure the NA went first on everything. So many of our special forces had to sit on the sidelines in the name of a “unified” front. That’s how we lost the war in 2001 and let bin ladin and his minions escape.

Another delusion of yours: Pakistan is going to control Warizistan and the tribal areas. They couldn’t do it in the past, they aren’t going to do it now, and the sending of a couple of copied 1950s soviet rifles sure as hell won’t change a thing.
Pakistan is in the pocket of violent islamicists, and has a nuclear bomb. Stop deluding yourself that they are an ally.

Xolom on October 23, 2008 at 3:51 PM

Ummm … do I have my history wrong or did arming the crap out of Afghani warlords in the 80s to beat the Russians not come back to haunt us? I realize that was Afghanistan, not Pakistan, but you’ll take my point. I am all for an ‘Awakening’ but let’s not ‘drop the ball’ when the fighting is over and they have won.

syg6 on October 23, 2008 at 4:32 PM

The Lashkars need support from the air to clear their immediate areas and quick reaction forces air and land to help defend them when attacked. Otherwise they will generally be outgunned even when on offense and will suffer defeats when the Taliban concentrate and overrun them in revenge attacks. This is the kind of clear, hold and overwatch we provided in Iraq during the surge.

Can Pakistan do this alone, I doubt it. With our air power, Pakistani helicopter borne forces and limiting actions to small areas until you slowly grow the security areas, this approach may work; but it will take a lot of time. Will we be patient?

KW64 on October 23, 2008 at 5:54 PM

Re the numberous comments saying the Northern Alliance let OBL go– Remember we recruited other militias to support the attack into Tora Bora. I would not call those forces the real Northern Alliance.

KW64 on October 23, 2008 at 5:58 PM

I supported these wars for freedom in Iraq and Afganistan, but the more I hear about Shira law in their constitutions, the less I support it. What kind of monsters can kill children (yes, Iran), but sentence a journalist to death and then commute it to 20 years in prison for talking about women’s rights? These people are so wrong it is scarry, and I don’t think I want any more of America’s finest young men to die for these people.

TimothyJ on October 23, 2008 at 8:25 PM

There are some significant differences between Iraq and Pakistan on this issue, though.

That’s an understatement. I think there are many Pashtuns who hate the Taleban but the days of unruly frontiers for nations need to come to an end. Time to roll out the modern world to these regions and it is up to the Pakistani nation to do that. Anyone else attempting this will be a setback to that goal. This does not mean that the US should not continue targeted killings of known terrorists or their camps but civilian deaths make the goal harder to achieve.

lexhamfox on October 24, 2008 at 1:45 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.