Huckabee, Giuliani cite Obama’s drug use in attacking media double standards
posted at 5:05 pm on October 20, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
They’re playing “the drug card,” writes Halperin, confirming my suspicion that there’s now a card for everything. See his post for links to both stories; Huck’s target is the press’s creepily thorough vetting of Joe the Plumber whereas Rudy’s after the Times for this weekend’s hit piece on Cindy McCain. (He went on to say he didn’t think Obama’s drug use was relevant.) In both cases, they’re following the lead of Maverick lawyer John Dowd, who dropped this on the NYT yesterday:
These allegations and efforts to hurt Cindy have been a matter of public record for sixteen years. Cindy has been quite open and frank about her issues for all these years. Any further attempts to harass and injure her based on the information from Gosinski and Clark will be met with an appropriate response. While she may be in the public eye, she is not public property nor the property of the press to abuse and defame.
It is worth noting that you have not employed your investigative assets looking into Michelle Obama. You have not tried to find Barack Obama’s drug dealer that he wrote about in his book, Dreams of My Father. Nor have you interviewed his poor relatives in Kenya and determined why Barack Obama has not rescued them. Thus, there is a terrific lack of balance here.
The left’s chattering today about something Rick Davis said to Hewitt in passing last week about having to “rethink” their position on verboten subjects like Wright in light of John Lewis’s racial demagoguery. Hewitt followed up by asking if that meant there are any surprises coming, to which Davis said this:
HH: Are there any surprises for McCain-Palin coming from the opposition research department about Barack Obama, stories we haven’t seen, video we haven’t heard, audio that has not been played?
RD: You know, Hugh, I don’t think it’s so much what you haven’t heard, I think it’s a good concentration on the kinds of things you’ve talked about on this show, is that why don’t we talk about the things we do know about? They’re damaging enough, and there’s serious questions to be answered. And I think only at the time when we can actually get Barack Obama to address these issues and start telling the American public what’s really going on with his life and experience in politics are we going to know what kind of president we’re going to have. And I think it’s time for people to start demanding answers.
Whether that’s a hint that the drug stuff is a case of coordinated messaging by the campaign or just a coincidence, and whether this is more likely to help Obama by humanizing him than to hurt him (as seemed long ago to be the case), I leave for you to judge. Exit question: Which nutroots all-star will be the first to pronounce this attack racist? Smart money’s on TPM, as always.
Update: Yeah, it’ll probably be TPM.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
I’m sure they’ll gladly release more information on Senator Government’s background once he’s locked into the presidency.
The fact that they’re screaming “landslide, landslide!” and still keeping stuff hidden is all the more support for the fact that “it ain’t over ’til it’s over”!
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:09 PM
I finally read the NYT Cindy piece. At least half of it. It would be a treat to see an equally indepth, personal probe of Michelle Obama. I’m sure they can find a friend or two from her past who has some interesting stories to tell about the Obama’s.
ctmom on October 20, 2008 at 5:10 PM
Once Senator Government is elected, there will be no investigations into his past.
carbon_footprint on October 20, 2008 at 5:12 PM
Since Obama publicly admitted this in front of high-schoolers when he tried to look “cool”, why not bring it up. Some of that stuff running around in his head might cloud his famous “Judgment to Lead”.
It was OK to bring up GWB’s DUI from 1976 in 2000, why not Obama’s public admission of drug use?
Steve Z on October 20, 2008 at 5:14 PM
Oh don’t tease me! I think the drug stuff is probably a coincidence actually, but hopefully people will stop wondering why the big 3 aren’t helping John out. (Mitt was on Cavuto today).
As far as cards: The Obama camp has only two, and they play them over and over – the ‘race’ card, and the ‘get out of jail free’ card.
Spirit of 1776 on October 20, 2008 at 5:14 PM
I am just looking forward to the press coverage in 6 months on what went wrong in the election. How did such an inexperienced, and frankly a little lazy, person get elected? The MSM will look at its role and determine that a little more due diligence in the future will be necessary.
bopbottle on October 20, 2008 at 5:14 PM
Senator Gummint will not be elected president. Make book on that.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:14 PM
Why hasn’t this irrelevant garbage been made into an ad already?
Because desperate times call for desperate smears.
Dave Rywall on October 20, 2008 at 5:15 PM
How that Bastard Johnny Stole My Election by Barry Obama, release date 2/01/09!
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:16 PM
My favorite card is the “You’re not qualified to be President because you have no experience card”. Can you believe these people?
bloggless on October 20, 2008 at 5:17 PM
Welcome back. Good to see your absence hasn’t changed you at all ;)
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:17 PM
Would it be a deal breaker if The Messiah still owed money to his dealer? HOw do we know he is in good standing?
bloggless on October 20, 2008 at 5:19 PM
Wouldn’t it be nice if the hit piece on Cindy was the straw that broke the camels back and the Wright issue went right on the table?
csdeven on October 20, 2008 at 5:20 PM
Please forward your concern to the NYT.
Spirit of 1776 on October 20, 2008 at 5:20 PM
You think a little drug use is gonna stop the Obama worship? He could be selling heroin out of the back of his airplane to orphans and the press would say he’s only doing it because Bush has let these poor unfortunates down.
Sugar Land on October 20, 2008 at 5:20 PM
I said months ago I could not vote for someone who has admittedly abused cocaine. That was a deal breaker for me w/any candidate. That just goes to the poorest judgement of the individual. Such an addictive drug has no place in anyone’s life.
I can accept pot even though I know it is addictive. I cannot accept anything harsher. I hope they hit him seriously on this b/c most Americans have never “done” cocaine and never would.
JAM on October 20, 2008 at 5:20 PM
Obama going for the “legalize pot” vote?
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:21 PM
Sort of like the Dubya DUI or the Todd Palin DUI…right, Dave? But I’m sure you voiced your opposition to those smears. Didn’t you?
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:21 PM
Wait for the MSM to say how the evil GOP is throwing the kitchen sink.
lodge on October 20, 2008 at 5:23 PM
Yeah, precisely. Obama’s drug use has been known for years; have you seen or heard much conservative banter about it during the election, Rywall? No one thinks it’s a huge deal, but the press does think Joe Wurzelbacher’s tax lien is. Why the contradiction?
Allahpundit on October 20, 2008 at 5:23 PM
I wonder what Barry thinks of this………..
……………. sauce for the goose?
Seven Percent Solution on October 20, 2008 at 5:23 PM
The Obama campaign accused Barack’s drug dealer of an extortion threat to “make up stories” when he asked for a few bucks, probably in lieu of selling his real life story to the Enquirer so he could move out of his car.
No wonder Obama’s shanty town brother in Kenya doesn’t ask for money and lives on one dollar a month.
econavenger on October 20, 2008 at 5:23 PM
Speaking of Sen. Government’s carbon footprint, did you observe the location of his office with Bill Ayers, 115 S. Sangamon Street, Chicago? There’s this HUUUUGE Smokestack on it. Was that operational when Obama was renting his office there? How much carbon did that thing put in the atmosphere? Obama is talking about forcing the EPA to impose regulations on carbon emissions down to your lawn mower, in the first months of his administration. Shouldn’t he be purchasing those credits now and paying fines for his prior emissions before he starts taxing the life out of everyone else?
eaglewingz08 on October 20, 2008 at 5:23 PM
What’s funny is that Chris Rock said that about coke and GWB. I imagine his stance is ‘nuanced’ now with respect to Obama.
Spirit of 1776 on October 20, 2008 at 5:23 PM
Hey Manly, I don’t suppose you remember which thread that big long question I presented to crr6 was, do you? I want to present it to Dave as well, and though I can retype it I’d rather save the effort if at all possible :P
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:24 PM
Once he’s elected and snug in the White House anyone attempting to find anything out will be dealt with swiftly and severely. You will never question the Chosen One.
UnEasyRider on October 20, 2008 at 5:24 PM
After that NYT hit-piece on Ciny McCain, there are still people on the McCain campaign “worrying” about what’s of limits? Nothing’s of-limits!
RMR on October 20, 2008 at 5:24 PM
Then be prepared for disappointment, JAM. Back in the wild 80’s (best years of my life) I wallowed in cocaine. A near death experience changed that and I never looked back, per Don Henley’s advice (Boys of Summer).
I saw hell firsthand and to this day I am an unwavering advocate of capital punishment for drug dealers.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:25 PM
DING DING DING…
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:25 PM
yep, and don’t let that infuence your vote either because that would be racism.
Roll Palin out more and lets beat this clown.
johnnyU on October 20, 2008 at 5:25 PM
Yeah, Dave, Shipley, Nonfactor, GrowFins have all called this recycled hit piece on Cindy McCain a smear, right? They believe that the hits on Joe the Plumber are over the top too, right? The front page story about a non-existent affair by McCain w/a lobbyist was a smear that should have never happened, right? John McCain and the Republicans are trying to scare you away from ME (Obama) b/c I don’t look like everyone else. Oh and I’m black smear was wrong, right? Right? Right?
JAM on October 20, 2008 at 5:25 PM
Brat on October 20, 2008 at 5:25 PM
At this point, it is best to just start hammering them with all of this information. Obama log rolling for Ayers book. Obama’s family. Where the eff are they and how come his closest relatives are in some Kenyan sh%7hole?
This constant crying over media treatment is so spineless. Yes, the media hates you. They hate Palin. The absolute best you can hope for is to go over their heads and make sure people know that Obama was a druggie. And that the neighborhood guy he knew nothing about got him to endorse his book on how to turn our children into socialist robots. And that he only disavowed his preacher’s teachings on hating America and hating whitey AFTER he decided to run for Presdient.
grdred944 on October 20, 2008 at 5:26 PM
Sort of like the Dubya DUI or the Todd Palin DUI…right, Dave? But I’m sure you voiced your opposition to those smears. Didn’t you?
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:21 PM
——
Dubya DUI = relevant
Todd Palin DUI = irrelevant
Dave Rywall on October 20, 2008 at 5:27 PM
Obama cocaine use = relevant. Checkmate.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:28 PM
‘Mystery’ man lends support to Obama
Brat on October 20, 2008 at 5:29 PM
You can’t humanize a narcissist like the One. Go for it.
Badger40 on October 20, 2008 at 5:30 PM
Let’s see, it was perfectly allright for the MSM to drop the October surprise on GWB for having a DUI 20 years before, but to bring up Obama’s drug use is not okay or racist?
If he were using CRACK, would that be relevant? NO?
Neither is palling around with a terrorist, Bernadine Dohrn.
Neither is taking money from TONY Rezko
Neither is being part of the Chicago political machine
Neither is NOT EVER, NEVER standing up to his own party.
Neither is his very little charitible contributions.
Neither is his CHOICE of a goofball for VP.
Neither is his taking 20 years to toss the Rev under a bus.
Neither is his NOT being his brother’s keeper.
Neither is his wanting to eliminate the 2nd amendment.
Neither is his campain manager’s tax leins, while JTP’s is.
Neither is his NOT releasing his medical records.
Neither is his NOT releasing his Columbia transcripts.
Neither is his NOT LEADING the way for our economic recovery
Neither is his wanting to spread the wealth.
But, according to Colin Powell, he speaks well, so we should vote for him?
I’m ORIGINAL Pechanga and I APPROVED this message
originalpechanga on October 20, 2008 at 5:31 PM
I’m thinking twofer here.
Ayers was probably his drug dealer.
….. “not that there’s anything wrong with that” – Colin Powell
fogw on October 20, 2008 at 5:31 PM
so if it hits that Obama is one big liar and been covering up his relationship with Ayers, from Baby sitting to Michelle O. working with Dohrn, to Obama working with Ayers in same office, etc.
How will it play in media? what day this week does it hit the fan?
jp on October 20, 2008 at 5:31 PM
You there, Dave?
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:32 PM
Manly-
It’s not that I don’t know people who’ve done coke, I do, and they all regret it. They are not running for POTUS, thank God. He speaks about his drug use so nonchalantly that it terrifies me. “…and a little blow, when I could afford it.”
I like my alcohol. I know that I could never try anything more addictive. I would like it too much. I know my limits. I really don’t believe that Obama does. I don’t think he sees a problem w/his past drug use or his associations. This is all just everyday standard operating procedure for him. He scares the sh*t outta me!
JAM on October 20, 2008 at 5:32 PM
There were plenty of rumors of Billy Jeff having a nose like a Hoover, the media didn’t care at all.
The only ones to point out that Billy Jeff was a fairly crazy person were writers at SNL…
Everyone else had better things to do.
benrand on October 20, 2008 at 5:32 PM
cocaine? but but but Palin owns a tanning bed!!!!!
SDarchitect on October 20, 2008 at 5:32 PM
That’s almost as good as TheBigOldDog’s list. Almost. :)
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:32 PM
I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama’s drug use criticism is being used to set the table for the 2004 video of Obama while running for the Senate calling for the decriminalization of drugs. The media wouldn’t touch that subject, but they’ll address the drug topic to hammer McCain’s campaign for out of bounds Obama criticism. That gives the GOP the opportunity to play the too liberal too socialist drug legalizer card, which is racist, naturally.
rw on October 20, 2008 at 5:32 PM
I actually agree.
McCain FTW!
Those lefties are going to be so sore.
carbon_footprint on October 20, 2008 at 5:33 PM
McCain is wondering what went wrong…where was the “honor” of not attacking a spouse, or child.
Palin and Trig, Palin and Bristol, it goes on and on…no Obama never says these things, it is always a surrogate…but then a crime boss never pulls the trigger…
right2bright on October 20, 2008 at 5:33 PM
Allah talked directly to him. I think he ran.
No offense, Allah :)
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:33 PM
Knowing what you know about me based on what I have posted here, would you vote against me?
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:33 PM
carbon_footprint on October 20, 2008 at 5:34 PM
You’re alright, kid. I like you. :-)
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:34 PM
Did not mean to strike!
carbon_footprint on October 20, 2008 at 5:34 PM
Just a question, did you or have you ever thought about writing a book about it?
Mcguyver on October 20, 2008 at 5:34 PM
Time for “God DAMN AMERICA”. STAT!
marklmail on October 20, 2008 at 5:35 PM
basically Obama is a coke-head, Commie and Terrorist allied, Baby killing, two-faced lawyer that the United States is about to elect simply because the media refuses to do its job.
jp on October 20, 2008 at 5:35 PM
“I’m here as a representative of the
CorleoneObama family…”*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:36 PM
If Barack is elected, don’t worry. Everything will be fine. With his health care plan, you will get your daily ration of hopium.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on October 20, 2008 at 5:36 PM
I wonder how far you’d get with “So did Barack Obama, and you guys didn’t have any problem with his drug days of the past” on such a campaign…
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:40 PM
Speaking of double standards, I saw Halperin on CNN yesterday. It was on Howard Kurtz’s show. Two chickies on there, Gloria Borger and another named Fouhy just giggled and then Kurtz went to commercial.
****GIGGLES FROM THE CHICKIES****
Brat on October 20, 2008 at 5:40 PM
Manly-
Probably not, b/c you have renounced that lifestyle. He has renounced nothing. Unless of course, it becomes suddenly inconvenient for him. Then of course, he will suddenly morph into Nancy Reagan and say that he has advocated “just say no” all along now…
I can forgive if someone asks for forgiveness. Ayers has not. That is why he is still an issue. Obama has not condemned his own past associations until he was running for President. He to my knowledge has not condemned his own behaviour about doing “blow.” I have a real problem w/that.
JAM on October 20, 2008 at 5:40 PM
Christ, Mac, I’m trying to write so much other stuff, including two novels. Please don’t distract me. Unless, of course, you are a publisher or know a publisher. In that case, let’s chat.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:41 PM
Probably not BECAUSE I have renounced it? I’m confused.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:42 PM
NO. I probably would not vote against you.
JAM on October 20, 2008 at 5:43 PM
Obama cocaine use = relevant. Checkmate.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:28 PM
——
A DUI is significantly more serious than college drug use.
But you’re entitled to your opinion.
Dave Rywall on October 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM
If he came out and said what I just said, it would be non issue for me. I still think it’s a non-starter. McCain is better off going after Ayers or Wright or Rezko.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM
Either he’s afraid of Allah or he finally managed to get the wrapper off his lollipop and has lost focus for now.
a capella on October 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM
How so? They’re both illegal – one is using an illegal drug period, the other is using a legal drug in an illegal manner (while driving). I fail to see why one is relevant but not the other.
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:46 PM
I agree, but I’m pretty sure the lefties/the media would make an issue of it ;)
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM
Smears? You mean like those brown streaks in your BVDs when you think about all those skeletons bursting out of Obama’s closet?
rokemronnie on October 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM
The principle difference being that alcohol is legal (and Bush was caught using it while driving) while cocaine was and still is an illegal narcotic(and Obama admitted to using it).
In another thread you said you spent the last two weeks of your exile at “debate camp.” If I were you, I’d ask for a refund. Looks like you got ripped off.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:48 PM
Then you must retract what you said earlier, JAM, when you said you would neveer vote for anyone who used cocaine.
I’d much rather you said you would vote against me. At least you would be consistent.
Please don’t mistake me, sir/madam. I don’t wish to shit on you. Just pointing out a discrepancy in the Socratic fashion! :-)
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 5:51 PM
You almost got it all into one sentence, but you left out Rev. Wright, ACORN, and Fannie Mae. Makes a big mouthful when you put it all together.
a capella on October 20, 2008 at 5:52 PM
Methinks it’s more that his previous post was badly worded…
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:52 PM
Obama’s drug use admission paired with an entirely not-safe-for-work segment from Chappelle’s stand-up. Did I mention NSFW? NSFW.
Cuffy Meigs on October 20, 2008 at 5:53 PM
My only point is they could have brought this up months ago.
They didn’t because things weren’t so desperate.
Now they are. So they’re starting to use it now.
I could give a shit. It won’t change anything.
Dave Rywall on October 20, 2008 at 5:53 PM
Are you people saying that Obama is BI…? Oct Surprise?
marklmail on October 20, 2008 at 5:58 PM
I agree it’s irrelevant. But so is Joe’s personal information. Where’s your denouncement of that scheme, Davey?
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 5:58 PM
The correct term is “I don’t give a shit” just as the correct term is “I could NOT care less.” The fact is that in both instances you do. It won’t change anything because Obama is sinking. Even his own people know it. It will get worse between now and November 4.
How confident are you in Obama’s victory, Dave? Wanna make another bet…this time for the whole pot o’ gold? Whaddya say, big guy?
Feeling lucky? Or are you just desperate?
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 6:00 PM
It’s still my view that the McCain camp should have opened up with both barrels on Obama’s character and fitness to serve about a whole thirty seconds after congratulating him on the nomination. The issue isn’t Ayers, it’s all his past associations and behavior, a twenty-year history of associating with and embracing the worse scum in Chicago.
JEM on October 20, 2008 at 6:01 PM
I’m personally more curious as to WHY Dave is pulling so hard for Obama. I get the impression he doesn’t even live here, if the calling him “Canuck” is true. Or did ACORN register him? (I keed, I keed)
Or, as I asked crr6, why he’s even here in the first place?
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 6:03 PM
Manly-
I should have qualified the cocaine use argument. I cannot vote for someone who has abused coke, and sees nothing wrong w/doing it, as is the case w/BO. I most certainly have voted for people who have made poor choices in life, but have turned away from those choices and repented those decisions. Lived, learned and walked away from those bad things and individuals who assisted them in their poor decision making.
I do still believe that most Americans have never even tried blow and never would, therefore this transgression should at least be aired to the masses. Unlike Rywall, I do not think this old news, b/c the people who just started paying attention most certainly do not know about Obama’s past drug use.
JAM on October 20, 2008 at 6:04 PM
Liberals, by nature, are busybodies. And the worst of the lot are Canadian Liberals.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 6:05 PM
Liberals are so cute…forever missing the point.
Grafted on October 20, 2008 at 6:06 PM
Well said, JAM.
Are you are sir or a madam? I like to know who I’m adressing insofar as I am an unrepentant chauvanist.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 6:07 PM
Barry only used those drugs (cocaine, weed, etc) to keep them out of the hands of “disadvantaged youths”.
/loonbat
omnipotent on October 20, 2008 at 6:07 PM
T-T-T-T-Too much time on my hands, its ticking away with my sanity;
I’ve got too much time on my hands, its hard to believe such a calamity!
I’ve got too much time on my hands and its ticking away from me -
Too much time on my hands, too much time on my hands
Too much time on my hands…
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 6:07 PM
I wish I could say, “Miss”, but have firmly passed into the “Madam” category sometime ago…
JAM on October 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM
Great shot, kid. Now don’t get cocky…
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM
Now I know the reason for the OCD re your planned revolution you keep going on about. You are stoned.
Bradky on October 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM
I don’t know about that. Most of the pot heads I’ve known from high school on are either still pot heads or worse. I have heard the argument that weed isn’t addictive, but behavior patterns and habits don’t always change. That’s more relevant then JTP tax liens and ‘Cuda’s tanning bed…
liquidflorian on October 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM
Obama admitted the drug use in his first memoir so that, if anyone tried to make it an issue, he could say “yeah, that’s old news.” And to be honest, it isn’t fair to hold Obama’s drug use 25 years ago against him today — any more than it would be fair to hold McCain’s infidelity against him from 30 years ago.
The comparison to Bush, though, is interesting. Bush admitted a substance abuse problem and talked about it. As part of that history of his life, he got a DUI in 1976 that had been expunged and sealed. Three days before the election, the media ran headline news reporting that “Bush had a secret DUI,” which caused the polls to violently jerk in Gore’s direction and probably caused the election to be as close as it was. I thought part of media ethics included not running salacious stories in the days before an election because you don’t want to unfairly influence the outcome….
Rest assured the MSM will NOT run any damaging stories from Obama’s childhood in the days before the election. That kind of stuff is awful whether it happens to Republicans or Democrats, but unfortunately, the media checks its ethics at the door when it comes to attacking Republicans.
Outlander on October 20, 2008 at 6:09 PM
*bowing in a courtly fashion*
The pleasure is all mine, madam.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 6:09 PM
Case in point
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on October 20, 2008 at 6:09 PM
Not quite, BradTroll. I don’t do drugs. Nor do I plan a revolution. But thanks for amusing us.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 6:12 PM
Your dodging my question, did you or did you not write (a novel perhaps), that has some wandering script illustrating that experience?
I’m reading your comments realizing that your online personality sounds like a book I bought and had signed by the author… :)
I’m not trying to fish you out.. I’m just having fun here!!
I’m always try to figure out who these personalities are just for the sake of fun.
You know that self-publishing is an option as sort of a advertising scheme, don’t you?
Mcguyver on October 20, 2008 at 6:17 PM
I wonder what Barry thinks of this………..
……………. sauce for the goose?
Seven Percent Solution on October 20, 2008 at 5:23 PM
____________________________________________________________
By Lois Romano
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, January 3, 2007; Page A01
Long before the national media spotlight began to shine on every twist and turn of his life’s journey,(obama)
____________________________________________________________
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL-Best laugh I’ve had all day!
christene on October 20, 2008 at 6:18 PM
angelodomini@aol.com. If you are interested.
ManlyRash on October 20, 2008 at 6:20 PM
Obama needs to be hammered on everything like this.
The constant rebuttal to his lack of experience is that he has good judgement.
His history proves that the exact opposite is true.
reaganaut on October 20, 2008 at 6:35 PM
Just sent you an email.
Mcguyver on October 20, 2008 at 7:15 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »