WSJ: Fear the coming liberal revolution
posted at 2:55 pm on October 17, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
What will a Barack Obama presidency mean? It will almost certainly give Democrats an undivided government, their first since 1993. In that period, Democrats tried nationalizing the health-care industry — and that was under the direction of a DLC-sponsored moderate President. Under Barack Obama, the Wall Street Journal predicts a return to 1965 … or 1933:
If the current polls hold, Barack Obama will win the White House on November 4 and Democrats will consolidate their Congressional majorities, probably with a filibuster-proof Senate or very close to it. Without the ability to filibuster, the Senate would become like the House, able to pass whatever the majority wants.
Though we doubt most Americans realize it, this would be one of the most profound political and ideological shifts in U.S. history. Liberals would dominate the entire government in a way they haven’t since 1965, or 1933. In other words, the election would mark the restoration of the activist government that fell out of public favor in the 1970s. If the U.S. really is entering a period of unchecked left-wing ascendancy, Americans at least ought to understand what they will be getting, especially with the media cheering it all on.
Some will say that the Democrats deserve a shot at undivided government again, since the Republicans had four years of control over both chambers of Congress and the White House in the Bush years. (Democrats controlled the Senate from 2001-2, thanks to Jumping Jim Jeffords.) Many Republicans, myself included, would gladly agree that the GOP didn’t use its opportunity to change the governing philosophy in Washington, but merely adopted its worst power-hoarding practices. That lost opportunity doesn’t mean the Democrats would make the same mistake.
Read the entire WSJ editorial. They note that in 1933 and 1965, liberal Democrats fundamentally abused the nature of government and its relationship to the economy in ways we still have not corrected. What changes can we expect in an Obama administration?
- Nationalized health care
- Union supremacy and a boost of cash to the Democratic Party
- Massive tax increases and redistributionism
- Curtailed free-speech protections
It’s not a pretty picture.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
I am personally going to vote against every congressional incumbent regardless of party affiliation. I am encouraging all of my friends to do the same.
Boot the bastards out.
crosspatch on October 18, 2008 at 3:14 AM
I am personally going to vote against every congressional incumbent regardless of party affiliation. I am encouraging all of my friends to do the same.
Boot the bastards out.
crosspatch on October 18, 2008 at 3:14 AM
In most cases, that wouldn’t be a bad thing.
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 3:23 AM
And So It Begins
aquaviva on October 18, 2008 at 3:43 AM
House Democrats Contemplate Abolishing 401K’s and Tax Breaks
aquaviva on October 18, 2008 at 3:46 AM
aquaviva on October 18, 2008 at 3:46 AM
Add to that one of the first priorities in the new Congress will be the passing of the ‘card check law’ that will rapidly increase union membership resulting in more money available to unions through dues and more backing for dems.
Exit question…Will this new money to be administered by the SSA go into Al Gore’s “lock box”?
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 4:01 AM
Good bye free talk radio. I’m Sirius.
GREENTURTLE on October 18, 2008 at 4:05 AM
Basically, it’s a choice between socialism and riots in the blue states.
I’ll take the riots.
Ronnie on October 18, 2008 at 4:12 AM
Ronnie @ 4:12
Nice stuff at your site…
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 4:26 AM
Thank you.
Ronnie on October 18, 2008 at 4:28 AM
Ronnie,
I think after John McCain is declared the winner Nov. 4th that I will switch over to msnbc to watch the carnage that surely will take place amongst their ‘analysts’. It will be like watching the Martian’s heads exploding in “Attack from Mars” when Eddie Arnold starts crooning his “Cattle Call”…
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 4:45 AM
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 4:45 AM
You catch McCain’s comedy routine on the subject of MSNBC? Good stuff.
Olbermann, mission accomplished sign, padded room, …
(Slim Whitman)
Ronnie on October 18, 2008 at 4:52 AM
I just happen to be moving to a small town in Texas (Tyler) on Nov 6th. I think I will also be buying a gun (or 2) after I get there. If the coming liberal apocalypse does happen I will be in the best place possible….
well…. it’s a dry town so Maybe not the BEST… but I will be well stocked on “cold ones” at all times.
twoarmman on October 18, 2008 at 6:05 AM
Nothing would please me more than seeing Olbermann in a padded room—-with a recording device provided for historical/medical journals on “Classic Derangement Syndromes”
Rovin on October 18, 2008 at 7:45 AM
And the complete elimination of voting integrity.
drjohn on October 18, 2008 at 8:48 AM
I’d like to know why it’s acceptable for concern about allowing illegals, felons and non-citizens to override the sanctity of my vote.
The voting process in Iraq has more integrity than it does in the US.
drjohn on October 18, 2008 at 8:54 AM
Question: when is the entitlement issue going to “crash sown”? The first Baby Boomers have just begun to retire this year.
Wait a sec: the year in which the first wave reaches 65 is in… 2012.
Can a Democrat supermajority handle the entitlements crash? It can’t, and they know it. They know that their children, who have now become accomplices to their scheme by supporting Obama, and their grandchildren, are going to pay for this. Those in Generation X have been very aware of this, for a long time. And they will probably pay the heaviest price of a Baby Boom Generation that never quite “grew up.”
It’s going to get very interesting when the generational war commences, beginning 2012. A McCain defeat this November could well become the Republican’s “blessing in disguise.”
newton on October 18, 2008 at 10:01 AM
If it starts in 2012 then it will not be Obama who has to deal with it but whoever gets elected in 2012, no? Also, people that close to retirement are more likely to vote for entitlements. I would think the 2012 and 2016 vote will be dominated by the senior population, the same ones who have been blocking any attempt to fix social security and vote predominantly for democrats.
neuquenguy on October 18, 2008 at 10:13 AM
That was “Mars Attacks” and the song was “Indian Love Call” by Slim Whitman,
Pelayo on October 18, 2008 at 10:34 AM
I AM JOE!
JellyToast on October 18, 2008 at 10:43 AM
“It’s not a pretty picture”, you wrote. And you and I, as small time blogger, will get hit early in The One’s reign. Our country has gone through what may happen before with President Adams and the Alien and Sedition Act and President Wilson and his misused Sedition Act., but the times are much different and technology offers more avenues to control our citizenry.
I suggest that if elected Mr. Obama will rule as an authoritarian socialist with the Patriot Act firmly under his control; I fear that Mr. Obama, if elected, will take advantage of the fear in America and go Chavez like to the determent of our republic; all the while having the media and elites applaud the need for such actions and encouraging compliance. Sort of like most of those who have seized unlimited power in the past have had their civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded as the military available as Mr. Obama showed he wanted when he ad-libbed that statement during a June, 2008 speech.
I don’t believe Americans would have the stomach for opposing such a perversion of our country; that would require sacrifice. They would be willing to relinquish freedom for security. It would not be the first him in the world’s history.
amr on October 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM
apparently you enjoy displaying your ignorance. there was no attack…he was hung before it happened…bible 101…oh and with this ‘attack’ you say happened, what army from the north joined this ‘attack’? and how could they ‘attack’ israel, when it didn’t even exist at that time? oh and tell me about how they burned the supplies for 7 years…after that ‘attack’
laughable.
right4life on October 18, 2008 at 11:50 AM
already happened with the ‘credit crisis’ you know, how we were all gonna die unless they passed that bill…
inject fear and panic, and watch the markets fall….and they did…and watch obama get elected, because he ‘cares’
right4life on October 18, 2008 at 11:52 AM
The WSJ is 180 degrees wrong. The conservatives will take a super majority and we won’t like that much either.
dogsoldier on October 18, 2008 at 11:55 AM
What leads you to conclude that conservatives will take a super-majority in Congress this November?
Who won’t like it that much? The liberals? If so, who cares?
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 12:31 PM
I’m trying to help “spread the wealth” around a little more, so I spent a little more time on my project this morning for all of you.
Use it wisely “grasshoppers”.
I am Joe!
Over.
1GooDDaDDy on October 18, 2008 at 12:36 PM
I am doing the same thing here. Unfortunately, there are too many sheep and in the Peoples Republic of California for the change to be widespread here, but I keep working and hoping
gstrickler on October 18, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Allah & Ed, many people are questioning YOUR BIAS BY NOT GIVING THIS A FULL AIRING!
.
THE POSSIBILITY WE ARE HEADED FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IS NOT SOMETHING YOU SHOULD NOT HIDE.
.
.
Gohawgs,
There are several posters besides you & I (ADRIAN comes to mind & others) have written extensively on that same topic. There was one headline thread “API claims it’ll release audio of the alleged Michelle Obama phone call” is a dead thread now- not even on the headline page anymore. THE RESISTANCE BY HOTAIR TO GIVING THIS MAJOR STORY ITS OWN THREAD IS BEYOND UNDERSTANDING. Even if Ed, Allah, Michelle think that multiple stories and MORE THAN ONE LAWSUIT re OBAMA’S UNWILLINGNESS TO PRODUCE PROPER PAPERWORK TO VERIFY HIS ELIGIBILITY may need further research into their veracity, IT IS STILL A MAJOR STORY THAT DESERVES TO BE READ/DISCUSSED/ACTED UPON by HA readers. .
.
~Papers regarding HIS FORMAL ADOPTION (by Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian national)
.
~HIS “VAULT”/LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE- NOT THE Certificate of Live Birth COLB that is online
.
~HIS INDONESIOAN/KENYAN/AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP PAPERS &/or any docs to CONTRADICT HIS DUAL CITIZENSHIP
.
~ANY ONE THESE MAKE HIM INELIGIBILE
.
There are so many new developments that HotAir not giving it its own thread is DISTURBING. THIS IS WHERE PEOPLE GO TO SEE WHAT THEY CAN’T SEE IN MSM.
.
This STORY INVOLVES SO MANY OTHER ASPECTS OF OUR GOVERNMENT – LET US HAVE A CHANCE TO SORT IT OUT.
.
.What’s the worse that happens? It turns out to be without merit AND PUTS DOWN ALL THE RUMORS? That alone would make it WORTHWHILE.
.
OR just keep posting MORE IMPORTANT TOPICS like: LIB BABY STOMPS OFF F&F and NBA player loses to Brit….
.
Allah & Ed, many people are questioning YOUR BIAS BY NOT GIVING THIS A FULL AIRING. AND IF YOU DON’T BURY THE STORY IN THE TITLE (like with the API/MICHELLE O story above) AND SIMPLY CALL IT “THE QUESTION OF OBAMA’s ELIGIBILTY TO BE PRESIDENT”, I’D BET THE FARM YOU’D GET LOTS OF TRAFFIC AT THE VERY LEAST.
.
THE POSSIBILITY WE ARE HEADED FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IS NOT SOMETHING YOU SHOULD NOT HIDE.
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 1:03 PM
The short and sweet of the 2008 election.
Dark-Star on October 18, 2008 at 1:04 PM
that’s better
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 1:12 PM
TNT has been replaying the movie “Signs” with Mel Gibson and Joaquin Phoenix. Freaky deaky movie, but for some reason I’m drawing a parallel with that movie and what our country is facing.
We might as well face it, we’re in for the fight of our lives. Not just our lives, but the vitality of our nation and capitalism as we know it.
Oink on October 18, 2008 at 1:48 PM
Signs and wonders of things to come: Sen. Boxer pressures banks for the Community Reinvestment Coalition, a left wing advocacy group that believes people have a right to credit. CRC
Here we go again, blowing up the next bubble.
PattyJ on October 18, 2008 at 2:02 PM
If it was all built on a house of cards, then why did the economy take a dive now? It was all part of a plan. Who pulled the plug?
Oink on October 18, 2008 at 2:02 PM
Signs and wonders of things to come: Sen. Boxer pressures banks for the Community Reinvestment Coalition, a left wing advocacy group that believes people have a right to credit. CRC
Here we go again, blowing up the next bubble.
PattyJ on October 18, 2008 at 2:03 PM
Quite possibly. All bubbles have to burst sometime…but the timing on this one is pretty funny for it to be a coincidence.
I doubt we’ll ever know for sure this side of eternity. Any person or persons with enough economic and political muscle to pull the plug at will were surely smart enough to hide their tracks and hide them good.
Personally I suspect a big connection to Obama; someone who either personally wants him elected for their own gain or wants the big 0 in so the US will be too impotent to interfere in something else they’ve got cooking.
Dark-Star on October 18, 2008 at 2:15 PM
NIghtmareOnKStreet at 1:12PM
I don’t think people understand the story. It takes quite a bit of digging to get the context because the API site organizes their articles by most-viewed rather than by chronology, and posts sometimes have the same format as actual API articles.
When I was following the Kenya riots API was one of the few sources of eyewitness accounts. There were articles and comments from both sides of the conflict. As of a little over a week ago, the articles were mostly pro-Obama.
Then last Tuesday Jerome Corsi was detained by what had to be Odinga people (because Kibaki folks knew of his planned press conference and had OK’ed it)That was a widely-aired news story and I think API wondered what was up.
On Oct 14th API posted an article from israel e news, askikng whether the Berg suit would really matter. Within half an hour another post by texasdarlin gave even more documentation showing the reasons why Obama’s eligibility for being president is suspect.
At the same time, Frank Gaffney of the WAshington Times published information about Berg’s suit. He said he had never even heard of it before then.
Somebody in Nairobi contacted Michelle asking her to intervene because API was giving legitimacy to Corsi’s claims about Obama. Who in Nairobi would have instant access and influence with Michelle besides Raila Odinga?
Odinga would have reason to want Corsi’s story quiet because Corsi was about to come out with documents showing that “stolen election” charges and violence were part of Odinga’s election plan and that Obama provided about a million dollars to Odinga’s campaign. Corsi was also making rumblings about possible Odinga strategy if Obama would win the presidency.
Mchelle must have called the afternoon of the 14th or morning of 15th. The first questions API had for Michelle were about Corsi’s arrest. What role had Odinga and Barack played in it? Michelle’s first concern was that Black reporters in Kenya cover for America’s potential first Black president. Circle the wagons. Michelle knows that if the Berg suit gets traction in the MSM through the WAshington Times, the attetion would necessarily go to Kenya for birth records. She was accusing API of aiding racists if they encouraged objective research and documentation for Obama.
She did that by focusing on the adoption issue. Should a patriotic Black man be ineligible for the presidency just because his stepdad adopted him? It’s all just a racist ploy to keep a Black from becoming president. And the Blacks who are against Obama are doing it out of envy (hint-hint, Back reporter – this is you). There was apparently a conversation about how Obama could straddle the fence between his Muslim supporter in Kenya and an American public that distrusts Muslims and Obama’s deceptions regarding his Muslim connections.
On the 15th API reported Michelle’s phone call. They got over 10,000 responses immediately and realized that what Michelle had said could cost Barack the presidency. In the meantime the Obama campaign called API liars and API’s credibility was on the line.
They also were informed that Obama has run an intimidation campaign full of lawsuits against those who expose information he doesn’t want known. And they probably thought that the information they have could start riots in America similar to those in Kenya. They consulted their lawyers and say they are in the process of clearing the tapes for release in such a way that they can’t be sued.
I don’t know if their weekend respects Muslim (Friday) holy day, Jewish (Saturday), or Christian(Sunday). I’ve been pulling my hair out waiting for the tape, but I suspect it will be Monday at the earliest, which might be best considering the news cycles. We’ll see.
But the story on its face seems credible to me IF Odinga was the person who didn’t want Corsi’s or Berg’s stories to get out and called Michelle – and if Michelle knew that Berg’s story had already broken into the MSM through The Washington Times so she wanted to silence those with potential access to the witnesses in question (i.e. Obama’s grandma, who could potentially ask to see Obama’s Kenya birth certificate if there is one.
I’ve been thinking of Berg’s suit as Frodo – never more than a fool’s hope, but the one which could possibly kill Obama’s candidacy if it could connect with the Crack of Doom – a judge or court who would require Obama to prove his eligibility.
Yesterday, when the SCOTUS ruled that the only party with standing to require Ohio’s Secretary of State to do her job, my hope died. The courts are not prepared to protect the process. We the people are not qualified to require our officials to follow the Constitution. If we elect a crook in a crucial position, none of us can do a darned thing to protect the Constituton. America is screwed.
I still want the tape released because it shows Michelle for the scum she is. But the courts will never allow one of us Joe the Plumbers to question Obama on which hospital he was born in (something the COLB never said)or whether a person loses their “natural born citizen” status if they lose their American citizenship later in life.
I think the coup to replace America with an oppressive regime has already happened. We the people are powerless in every sense of the word EXCEPT (so far) the ability to talk to our neighbors about what we know. This is the last chance we may have to ever do that, because if we don’t use that power now, Obama and his communist Chicago mob will take it from us. Frodo can’t save us. Only the Joe the Plumbers of the world, like you and me, can do it.
justincase on October 18, 2008 at 2:19 PM
I believe nothing is so sinister to be unbelievable!
Oink on October 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM
PattyJ on October 18, 2008 at 2:02 PM
Thx for the link. That is unbelievable although, I am not the least bit surprised…
kareyk on October 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM
How far back do you want to go?
Article EXCERPT:
According to our Indonesian sources, “officials” who accompanied (U.S. Congressman Eni) Faleomavaega were interested in acquiring any and all documentation or photographs of a young Barry Soetoro for America’s “national archives” and they were offering cash, lots of it. In a show of faith, Barack Obama’s childhood school would be one of the very first beneficiaries of this outpouring receiving thousands of dollars to upgrade the school and for the purchase of computer equipment, thanks in part to the benevolence of this visiting junket.
The challenge of course was securing Indonesian goverment records potentially damaging to Barack Obama’s candidacy for the US presidency as well as other records pertaining to a young Barry Soetoro and his family wouldn’t be so easy to acquire and secure, and for this, the visitors would need the assistance and cooperation of the Indonesian government.
It’s not that getting Indonesian government help is difficult, it’s not. It’s no secret that Indonesia is one of the most corrupt countries on the planet… Convincing the Indonesian government that an Obama presidency will be able to deliver that “change” and that it was in the interest of both countries to see that Barack Obama was elected was nothing more than a fait accompli for Faleomavaega’s entourage…
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 2:21 PM
ATTEMPTED MANIPULATION BY SEN. CLAIRE McCASKILL, OBAMA, ETC TO CHANGE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
.
2nd ARTICLE EXCERPT:
“2d Session S. RES. 511: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.: In the Senate of the United States.” was Sponsored by Senator McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy, Obama, Coburn, Clinton and Webb. Why? Why were Democratic Senators trying to pass a Resolution making Senator McCain undoubtedly Legally Eligible when this issue had already been cleared up in 2000 and again in 2004? And why did Senators McCaskill and Obama reportedly insert the following Clause?
.
*****“Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President”*****
.
This Clause has no particular relevance to McCain and the following Clause, which it is reported McCaskill and Obama attempted to REMOVE shows that:
“; and Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936:”
It seems clear that McCaskill and Obama were attempting to create a blanket Resolution covering ALL Foreign Born candidates. Why do that if not to benefit a Foreign Born Democratic Candidate, who did not have a US Military background?
McCain & Richardson did not need this resolution… nobody needed this Resolution unless somebody in the race was born outside the USA and was “Covering his/her Ass” and the only individual in the race that that could apply to was Senator Obama! This in turn would show that the Senator is a liar who has been peddling untruths about his birth for at least 16 years!
***********************************.
.
When there’s a fire, you’re supposed to aim the EXTINGUISHER at the BASE of the fire, right? WHY, then, are LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS OF OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY NOT ALL OVER THIS BLOG? BIAS, MUCH?
THERE’S SO MUCH MORE…
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 2:22 PM
Which is why these stories NEED THEIR OWN THREAD. PLEASE, ALLAH, ED, MICHELLE??
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 2:26 PM
Personally I suspect a big connection to Obama; someone who either personally wants him elected for their own gain or wants the big 0 in so the US will be too impotent to interfere in something else they’ve got cooking.
Dark-Star on October 18, 2008 at 2:15 PM
>>>>>>>>>
I suspect George Soros. I didn’t know his history of this kind of crap, but David Horowitz has a bunch about it. I read China’s plan for all-out warfare, including cyerspace, financial, satellite, chemical, etc warfare, and it kept referring to George Soros and his economic sabotage of them – a strong source of their desire to annihilate us economically. See particularly the appendix (halfway down) at http://rtwp.blogspot.com/2007/05/george-soros-media-matters-richard-poe_09.html
(more detail at http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID=C787962B-2E7D-4345-BAE6-B40B0974B6F6)
Examples are Russia, Yugoslavia, Ukraine, and Georgia. Russia’s opposition now began with their distrust of America as a result of Soros screwing them badly through corruption. We need Russia to be with us, but right now they are against us – partly because our own George Soros has showed them we can’t be trusted.
justincase on October 18, 2008 at 2:37 PM
Could Obama have been born in Kenya?
We know that the birth announcement in the Hawaii paper was just that, an announcement.
Could there be documentation proving that Obama was born in Kenya? Would the hospital have those records?
Notice that Obama STILL will not produce the evidence to prove beyond any doubt that he was born in Hawaii. All we got was the forged paperwork based on his sister.
What happens if he gets elected and during his first term evidence pops up that he was NOT born in the USA but in Kenya?
Think about that. It COULD happen.
If I had to bet, I’d say he WAS born in Kenya, and his mother took him to Hawaii, and then there was the announcement but NO birth certificate.
Would Obama resign if it was proven he was born in Kenya?
Or, would he use the military to prop up his regime?
Interesting isn’t it?
Sapwolf on October 18, 2008 at 2:46 PM
scales on eyes
BL@KBIRD on October 18, 2008 at 2:54 PM
Yes. And academic after November 4, insofar as Obama will lose the election.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 2:56 PM
More points:
1. Regardless of where he was born, Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian national and placed into Indonesian schools that only accepted Indonesian citizens. Records from the school show: Citizenship: Indonesian, Religion: Muslim
.
2. Obama says he traveled to Pakistan in 1981. US citizens were prohibited from traveling to Pakistan at that time therefore he couldn’t have used a US passport. Probably used his Indonesian passport.
.
3. The Certificate of Live Birth (COLB)/short form he put on his website and a curiously different version of the same document that can be found on dKos IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FORM OF PROOF OF BIRTH SUCH THAT YOU & I NEED TO APPLY FOR A REPLACEMENT SOCIAL SECURITY CARD- because it is not a “VAULT” or long form which is the ONLY BIRTH CERTIFICATE MY STATE’S DMV ACCEPTS AS PROOF OF ID FOR A DRIVER’S LICENSE
.
SINCE THESE QUESTIONS ARE SO PREVALENT AS TO BE A DISTRACTION (2 LAWSUITS HE IS FIGHTING TOOTH & NAIL WITH HIS C.A.I.R. LAWYERS) He COULD EASILY PUT AN END TO IT BY ALLOWING HIS DOCS TO BE PUBLIC JUST LIKE JOHN McCAIN DID.
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 3:14 PM
Crystal balls aside, when you are in rough waters and someone throws you a lifeline, you don’t say, “Nah, it doesn’t matter because in 10 minutes the Coast Guard will be patrolling the area.”
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 3:19 PM
And Obama WON’T make the docs. public because he doesn’t have them. We already know the dKos one is a forgery.
WHY does Obama keep dodging the issue? I would just dig up my US birth certificate and post it.
What am I missing here? Why is he still not proving he is a citizen to put all this to rest?
If I was him, I long ago would have got the legitimate paperwork and proved it, end of story.
My guess is that he really was born in Kenya and this is why Corsi has had some difficulties out in Kenya.
Sapwolf on October 18, 2008 at 3:21 PM
a) It’s not a lifeline, but a single tread of dubious probity
b) The waters are rough, but I’m not drowning and neither is the nation – just yet
c) McCain will win the election. Period. That is not an opinion, it is a fact.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 3:35 PM
Americans think Obama will “fix” the economy?
Yeah, like a mob boss fixes a race.
What lunacy beholds us that such a term is so badly misunderstood.
Saltysam on October 18, 2008 at 3:40 PM
Agreed. We’ve got 17 days before the election. We get McCain across the finish line in first, then the whole question becomes moot and we’ve bought ourselves four more years. If worse comes to worse, then it will be time to consider options. But ’til then, let’s concentrate our efforts on the election–better to avoid the Plague than to have to try to cure it.
Matt Helm on October 18, 2008 at 3:43 PM
How has McCain failed to say?-:
“Senator Government, at our second debate, quoted the famous line of Ronald Reagan, (who I’m sure he loves): ‘Are you better off that you were four years ago?‘ But what Barry is conveniently forgetting is that the Democrats… his Party… took control of the House and Senate 1n 2006.
So the real question is: ‘Are you better of now than you were TWO years ago, when the Democrats took control of Congress?‘
And, if not, then, my friends, isn’t it time to throw these bums out!?”
Team McCain needs to tie the millstone of the economy around the correct Democratic necks.
And sink them with the mess they made.
profitsbeard on October 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM
Here is what has been happening to the you. It’s old but from someone who should know.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k6KUDv1wzraWhwlBt1
This should be viral.
BL@KBIRD on October 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM
They are sinking already – at least Obama is. You will be very surprised when you see the results of state and local elections on Nov 4. Very surprised.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 3:51 PM
How is it that there isn’t SOMEONE who can demand that he present his birth certificate? It would seem that a Presidential candidate should be fully vetted (birth certificates, questionable associations…etc.) before being accepted as a candidate.
dmarie on October 18, 2008 at 3:57 PM
.
Go use some of your superior psychic abilties on the lottery or something. YOU REPEATED ATTEMPTS TO SQUASH THIS TOPIC ARE QUITE TELLING, AND VERY BORING.
.
MANLY, YOU ARE MUCH MORE ATTRACTIVE WHEN YOU ARE DOING WHAT YOU DO BEST:
~~~~~~~~~PLAYING “TOILET”~~~~~~
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 4:06 PM
Ordinarily, that is something the so-called Fourth Estate does. This year, the Fourth Estate abdicated its role as the watchdog of the republic and thrown its lot in with Obama, figuring that once The One is in power, the Alternative Media (talk radio, the conservative blogosphere and Fox News) will be crushed and eliminated.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 4:08 PM
What kind of a world will we live in when the media has Democrats in control of all branches of Government? As it is, Democrats and the media hold more contempt for an ambitious plumber than they do for William Ayers. Woe be to those who challenge liberal orthodoxy in the New Age.
Angry Dumbo on October 18, 2008 at 4:09 PM
And you are a one-note samba.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 4:12 PM
.
Project much, MOBY?
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 4:30 PM
How is it that there isn’t SOMEONE who can demand that he present his birth certificate? It would seem that a Presidential candidate should be fully vetted (birth certificates, questionable associations…etc.) before being accepted as a candidate.
dmarie on October 18, 2008 at 3:57 PM
Because we, the people, assume that those running for such a high office have at least some integrity. That and as Manly says above “the Fourth Estaste” in the past has done the vetting for us. This election cycle, the MSM has acted as BHO’s PR firm, spinning stories questioning BHO off into oblivion. We have all seen what happens when one “assumes”…
For far too long the Republicans in Congress, and a few dems, have remained silent as the dems poured tax payer money into ACORN and other similar groups; slept with high ranking Fannie Mae employees; accepted bribes; infected society with their socialist agenda; and created a situation through legislation where 1 trillion dollars in American wealth vanished in one day. Yes, there were those who raised objections but they were soon quiet again.
I would think that after the Florida fiasco of 2000 that President Bush would step up and order the DOJ to vigorously investigate any and all fraud effecting this election. I guess he hasn’t been taking his Geritol. When will someone in the Federal gov’t. stand up and say NO!!???
As for my earlier, and I do mean early — it was 4 am here — misstatements, yes it was Slim and not Eddie and the correct title is “Mars Attacks”….
I hope that playing Sarahcuda rather loudly will have the same effect…
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 4:34 PM
As I understand it, Berg originally filed a suit against Obama only and was told it was none of his business (he had no standing to file suit). So he filed it against Obama AND the DNC because he gave money to the DNC to help them come up with an eligible candidate and they failed to do the job. Now the issue, as always, comes down to whether it’s any of his business to care whether Obama is eligible.
How can a government of the people, by the people, and for the people say it’s not a citizen’s business if that government is corrupt? People lament the fact that nobody cares. I hold the exact opposite. There are millions just like me who care deeply – but we are told by our courts that “it’s none of our business” – we have no legal standing to demand that our government follow its own law.
The Cloward-Piven Plan is a way to convince people that they can’t trust their government. The fastest way to achieve that is by making the government untrustworthy. Congratulations to them. They’ve succeeded. The question now is how we DEMAND our nation’s integrity to be OUR business.
The American Revolution was a response to (among other things) taxation without representation. Angry Joe the Plumbers threw tea into Boston Harbor in protest. Do we need to write to our judges and let them know that when they tell us our government is no longer our business it calls for revolution? That if they won’t protect our Constitution, then we will at the shooting end of a gun?
Freedom is never more than a generation away from extinction, according to Ronald Reagan. Is our “generation” totally represented by lawyers who consider the sanctity of this nation to be nobody’s business but their own?
justincase on October 18, 2008 at 4:35 PM
Angry Dumbo, there are currently at least 3 people are suing Obama to produce the CORRECT DOCS AS OPPOSED TO THE ONES HE HAS HANDY. The suit that has garnered the most attention is Phillip Berg vs Barack Obama see case file here and video here
IF YOU THINK THIS DESERVES ITS OWN HotAir THREAD WITH ITS OWN TITLE TO DRAW MORE ATTENTION, PLEASE VOICE YOUR OPINION AS SEVERAL OF US HAVE:
michelle@hotair.com
allah@hotair.com
ed@hotair.com
THE RESISTANCE TO AIRING THIS HERE IS DISTURBING
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 4:43 PM
Per the Berg lawsuit…IF BHO and the DNC wanted to shut down a lot of speculation of him, they could have simply produced the documents in question. The case would’ve been dismissed and all other “hanging by a string” questions would have just gone away. Instead, BHO and the DNC are spending money to fight and delay the lawsuit. WHY? Anybody?
Now, their actions have spawned another lawsuit in the state of Washington. A lawsuit to force the Washington Secty of State to verify BHO’s eligibility. Maybe this is the tact to take, sue individual state officials…
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 4:44 PM
API says the Michelle Obama story will be updated tomorrow, Oct 19th.
justincase on October 18, 2008 at 4:53 PM
Gohawgs, before this whole financial catastrophe I don’t think this “oversight” would have continued. The majority of voters never pay much attention before the debates begin so that would have been the time people would’ve begun to “notice” that
The Messiah has been COCKBLOCKING the Constitution.
.
Now with the mood of the country so preoccupied, having been mugged by the Dems, it seems like the country has Post Traumatic Stress Disorder or just went for a walk in the poppy field with Dorothy from “The Wizard of Oz”!
.
BUT MOST OF ALL, I AM SHOCKED THIS HASN’T BEEN ON THE TOP LEFT OF HotAir’s Home Page. What is up HERE?
If you haven’t already seen it, here is a glimpse of what is going on in this country now. Yuri Bezmenov lays it out nicely in this video
.
It will help pass the time until MOBY THE DICK (ManlyRash) comes back and starts his McCain-is-going-to-win-MOVE-ALONG-PEOPLE-THERE’S-NOTHING-TO-SEE-HERE SAMBA.
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 5:14 PM
Hold it right there!
I’m a staunch conservative of the three-legged-stool variety, and I’m offended by the misuse of the term “liberal”.
It is a Coming Marxist Revolution, and with it, come all its tyrannical, repressive underpinnings. We may find ourselves in a bit of a pickle in the future when liberalization during this type of regime would mean “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
If we seek a revitalization of the American way, we should be wary of abusing the liberal tag. We may want it for ourselves in the not-so-distant-future.
Saltysam on October 18, 2008 at 5:20 PM
justincase, (great name. we used to joke around that if I picked Justin for our son’s name, his middle name had to be Case. Thankfully, “Justin” turned out to be “Jenna”)I’m not getting too worked up over that until and unless I hear that tape with my own ears, are you?
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM
Which brings up the question of … What the heck ever happened to Passportgate? It seems that everyone has forgotten about that one. A few Obama tools rummaging through passport records ….
progressoverpeace on October 18, 2008 at 5:33 PM
Moby?????!!! ROTFLMAO. You and your little jeremiad are just too funny. Now run off and conference with Dave Berg about Obama’s secret “other wife” in Kenya.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 5:37 PM
Damn…you stumbled on the dark secret. Michelle, Ed and Allah are actually code names for Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the Messiah. They secretly control this site.
Unfortunately, this means you know too much.
To HotAir Special Agents Blumflerg and Sippowicz: The order is Klaatu, Barada, Nikto. Proceed as directed…CONDITION RED.
I repeat…CONDITION RED.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 5:44 PM
Manly, JSM is gonna be mad at you for bringing up Jeremiad Wright…LOL
Couldn’t you have used something other than the Sci-Fi classic, “The Day the Earth Stood Still” for your derision?
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 5:49 PM
“Listen to me, people,” he screamed.
“I read the book. I read The Audacity of Hope.
It’s a cookbook! It’s a cookbook! Aaaauuughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh…”
LOL. Geez…this stuff practically writes itself.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 5:50 PM
How about a Twilight Zone episode? That’s where N.O.K.S. belongs.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 5:51 PM
NOKS is a concerned citizen, like many of most of us here on HA. Like those that flooded the Univ. of Nebraska system with emails, letters and phone calls when it became known that the unrepentant terrorist/college professor known as Bill Ayers was scheduled to speak at one of their campuses.
Sometimes it only takes a normal tone of voice to be recognized. Other times it takes someone yelling at the top of their lungs ala “I’m mad as hell and I’m not gonna take it anymore!”
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 5:59 PM
I’ll have you know that McCain is going to win is, in fact, a waltz – not a samba. Obviously you have no ear for music.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 6:00 PM
I know that NOKS means well. It’s just that I’m bored and picking on the deranged amuses me at the moment.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 6:02 PM
To: ManlyRash=MOBY-THE-ONE-NOTE-DICK
.
MANLY, YOU ARE MUCH MORE ATTRACTIVE WHEN YOU ARE DOING WHAT YOU DO BEST:
~~~~~~~~~PLAYING “TOILET GAMES”~~~~~~~
.
BA-WOOOOOOOOOOSH, THEN RINSE & REPEAT! LOL!
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 6:11 PM
Maybe keeping your powder dry for when lgm or chappy inevitably crawl out from under rocks would be better…
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 6:12 PM
You, too NOKS
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 6:12 PM
Obama’s TV ads keep claiming the Tax Policy Center finds in favor of Obama vs. McCain plans, though that Center’s abstract finds that McCain will reduce taxes 4.2 trillion to Obama’s 2.9 trillion cut. Obama claims he’s going to help more people than McCain. Doesn’t stand to reason from either the tax cut figures or from their personal lives. Obama won’t even send his own brother a dollar a month, nor any of his Kenyan family any money or buy them any homes. But McCain adopted a child in need of survival, and houses his extended family without sending anyone to ask the government for a subsidy or welfare benefit.
maverick muse on October 18, 2008 at 6:13 PM
I am well past fearing the liberal revolution including a filibuster proof senate. I fear a congress which can pass constitution amendments at will about 2010 or 12. Then we will have Obama brand supreme court packing backed up by the constitution. Maybe, we will get professor Ayers and reverend Wright as the tenth and eleventh justices.
I fear two generations of people who are currently illegal aliens who will vote Democrat till long after I am dead. I think the country will be lucky if the Democrats do not control the White House for the next sixteen years. Two years ago when the Democrats took control of congress and Ed was posting about what we would need to do to win this time, I commented that we would be lucky to get congress back in eight years.
I fear for my grandchildren who will be paying taxes when the government consumes 50% of GDP.
burt on October 18, 2008 at 6:21 PM
As per what Obama did actually vote FOR, whether or not it passed, Obama DID vote to allow the Bush tax cuts to expire (including the death tax to return into effect), and at that point raise taxes on people earning between $40K (single) to below $45K (married joint). Right, it was a resolution, and it did not pass. But for ALL OF THE PRESENT VOTES THAT OBAMA CAST, hiding his true nature, Obama actually DID VOTE TO RAISE TAXES ON THOSE EARNING ABOUT $40K/annually.
Anyone whose parents or selves are approaching that age, what your parents want to be able to leave you after they die as YOUR INHERITANCE should not be swiped by the government who already raked in taxes upon taxes on that same inheritance already.
It doesn’t matter if your parents have $20K or $200K or $2million to leave you in their Will. It isn’t the government who should inherit your inheritance via death tax.
Yes, there are legal ways to avoid some of that difficulty via trusts. But the government is not excused for overextending their “right” at the cost of the citizens “rights” of inheritance.
maverick muse on October 18, 2008 at 6:25 PM
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM
Until the tape comes out I don’t know if API is telling the truth. But if the tape comes out, it wil put the Berg case at the front. If Odinga was the one who called Michelle it could bring the relationship with him into daylight as well.
justincase on October 18, 2008 at 6:28 PM
ARTICLE 3 EXCERPT
Senator Obama needs to produce his Paperwork, all of it,(”VAULT” COPY OF BIRTH CERTIFICATE), not just a Certification of Live Birth from the State of Hawaii, but all his other Paperwork too (Official Indonesian adoption papers, school records, ALL passports, travel records, Citizenship papers from every country he was ever a citizen of, no matter the circumstances, his applications to college, Columbia & Harvard along with ALL TRANSCRIPTS AND RECORDS OF STUDENT LOANS, A COPY OF HIS WILL AND THE RESULTS OF HIS LAST PAP SMEAR- whatever it takes to PROVE his case BEYOND DOUBT.).. (emphasis mine)
.
So, the Senator WAS a Dual National. That is now an admitted fact, admitted by his own Campaign and by Annenberg. The Senator is a Constitutional Lawyer which means that he knows, and has always known, that he is probably Ineligible to Hold the Office of POTUS, or that, at the very least, there is a strong Legal Argument that that is the case. In turn, that means that as he lied about his Kenyan and British Citizenships he is probably lying about his Indonesian Citizenship.
.
I do not suppose that it was ever his intention to give up his US Citizenship and it does not matter to me one bit. It doesn’t matter to Indonesia either. If Lolo Soetoro adopted him he ceased to be a US Citizen in the mid 1960s, BY INDONESIAN LAW. He also ceased to be a Kenyan Citizen, BY INDONESIAN LAW. By Kenyan and US Law he retained his Original Citizenships, until his 21st Birthday. By Indonesian Law he could have given up Indonesian Citizenship at age 18, but did he? If he didn’t he was, albeit accidentally, displaying a Legal Intention to void his US Citizenship, since he knew he could not Legally hold both Citizenships.
.
If a Naturalized Citizen cannot hold the Office of POTUS because they previously held another Citizenship it is egregious, so far as I am concerned, that a Dual Citizen/Former Dual Citizen should claim to have a Legal Right to do so. I refer the reader to my Articles on Dual Citizenship and ask you to read the quotes from Blackstone.
.
This new material at “Fight the Smears” displays arrogance, hubris and bad faith, in my opinion. It is the Senator’s reaction to Phillip Berg’s Law Suit, and, basically, it amounts to an open admission of mens rea. He is flaunting his bad faith and in so doing destroys his own case.
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 6:28 PM
LOL. I feel your pain.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 6:31 PM
.
maverick, thanks for the clarification of O’s votes.
.
I wish there was one centralized open thread that we could post these bits of info for us all to cut, paste & share. Kind of like a “Quick Response” election thread.. If this were the “old days”, left to our own devices, we’d be the ones with the dinky printing press in our basement, trying to get the word out.
.
Do you think that kind of thread would be a good idea?
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 6:35 PM
Ask Mchelle. Or Ed. Or Allah. I’m sure they would approve.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 6:40 PM
Maybe they should fear the coming severe fracture a far left gov would cause …
Benjamin9 on October 18, 2008 at 6:51 PM
.
Um, MOBY-ManylyRash-DICK…………………. A.C.O.R.N. IS GOING TO FIRE YOU IF YOU DON’T MAKE YOUR QUOTA TODAY!
NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 6:58 PM
I really shouldn’t respond…what with all the politically correct gospel about not teasing the mentally defective…but I can’t resist.
Please tell me how you deduced that I work for ACORN.
This I have GOT to hear.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 7:03 PM
Boys, don’t make me have to get the ruler out!!!
Gohawgs on October 18, 2008 at 7:11 PM
.
MOBY-Manly says, “Oops.” //walks away whining for his Mommy-MOBY//
.
.
U can read, right MOBY-Man? It’s nothing to be ashamed of if you can’t. Here’s a link to the nearest “Literacy Volunteers of America” in your area
.
“Now, off you go…play with your
nutsA.C.O.R.N.s. Good MOBY-Man.”NightmareOnKStreet on October 18, 2008 at 7:21 PM
This thread sure brought out the crazies.
Nonfactor on October 18, 2008 at 7:24 PM
Poke them only once and they rave on and on. Jolly good fun. Give it a shot. Tell him that you don’t believe Obama is a crypto-Muslim whose birth certificate is hidden in a jar of mayonnaise under Funk & Wagnall’s porch.
Then sit back and wait for the fireworks.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 7:30 PM
LOL
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 7:32 PM
Come to think of it, a straightjacket might be more appropriate. Or, perhaps, some holy water and an exorcist.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 7:38 PM
I must say I haven’t had time to read through ALL of the comments here, but when Manly Rash says “McCain’s going to win, period,” it makes me feel better. Obviously no one knows, but I read nothing more into it than reassurance when I need it.
Oink on October 18, 2008 at 7:38 PM
Of course McCain will win. They couldn’t even beat Bush. Obama will do no better than Kerry did.
Ronnie on October 18, 2008 at 7:42 PM
A little optimism does go a long way. McCain should be firing on the “growth versus stagnation” theme as much as time permits. This is the difference. People want to grow.
progressoverpeace on October 18, 2008 at 7:46 PM
I won’t click on your name but, instead will savor the fantasy that you are the electronic ghost of Ronald Reagan.
ManlyRash on October 18, 2008 at 7:48 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »