Sistani supports Iraq-US military agreement

posted at 9:05 am on October 17, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

Nouri al-Maliki won support from Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani for a continuing military alliance with the United States.  Sistani endorsed Maliki’s plan for the status-of-forces agreement, support that will help Maliki with key Shi’ite constituencies in the National Assembly.  Al-Sabaah reported the development yesterday, and note the mention of American concessions (via TMV):

Informed sources revealed yesterday to Al-Sabaah that the government received a new draft of the convention on security with the United States two days ago. President Jalal al-Talabani along with the Prime Minister were very clear in pointing out that the United States had made concessions on several points of contention in the agreement. At a press conference in Najaf after his meeting with Grand Ayatollah Sistani, al-Maliki said that talks on the security agreement with the United States are in their final stages, but he acknowledged that there are still points that need research and deliberation, and that “the final review still isn’t complete.”

Regarding the religious authority’s opinion on the agreement, al-Maliki said: “Grand Ayatollah Sistani entrusts Iraqis and their political leaders to decide on what to agree to and rely upon.” Al-Maliki stressed that Ayatollah Sistani, “had no objections to anything we achieve through the efforts of Iraq’s officials and institutions, provided that all segments of the Iraqi people participate and that it is constitutional. In addition, he said that it mustn’t be something imposed on the Iraqi people.”

The Prime Minister revealed some of the progress and positive points that have been made in the ongoing discussions with the United States, notably in regard to limiting the duration of the presence of American forces in Iraq. This will be completely terminated by the end of 2011, and in addition, American forces will be completely withdrawn from Iraq’s cities and towns by the middle of next year [2009].

The need for American concessions became obvious when the Iraqis rejected out of hand the first US proposals on the SOFA.  The nature of those concessions aren’t apparent from this report, but it obviously doesn’t include the American insistence on immunity from Iraqi prosecution for US military personnel.  Maliki mentioned that as an open question while calling the status of the SOFA negotiations “final stages”.

Maliki predicted that an agreement would be reached by the end of the year, and his meeting with Sistani clearly intends to achieve that.  In order to mollify Shi’ite political leaders, who don’t want American troops in Iraq any longer than necessary after our partnership with the Sunnis, Sistani would have to approve of the policy Maliki intends to follow.  He’s plowing the ground, pre-empting any potential opposition to the SOFA at least enough to ensure its passage in the National Assembly once complete.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

It is just the hooker diplomacy. Take what you want and send us on our way.

volsense on October 17, 2008 at 9:11 AM

Can’t wait for the idiot comment from Hopey!!!

canopfor on October 17, 2008 at 9:16 AM

Hopey Sez: I opposed the Iraq War from the beginning. There were no WMDs. I enjoy talking about 5 years ago.

BKennedy on October 17, 2008 at 9:18 AM

Wow more good news that doesn’t make the news.

koolbrease on October 17, 2008 at 9:24 AM

WAIT – I thought Obama told those Iraqi’s to wait until he get’s in office before making any agreements???????????

pherrman on October 17, 2008 at 9:24 AM

WAIT-I thought……

pherrman on Oct 17,2008 at 9:24AM.

pherrman:After Obama does a re-do on NAFTA in Canada,
Iraq is next!:)

canopfor on October 17, 2008 at 9:30 AM

Al-Maliki stressed that Ayatollah Sistani, “had no objections to anything we achieve through the efforts of Iraq’s officials and institutions, provided that all segments of the Iraqi people participate and that it is constitutional

What a novel thought. Wonder where they developed this concept?

Rovin on October 17, 2008 at 9:31 AM

“All infidels that saved our sorry butts and have created a greater Iraq than ever existed before must remove their contaminated selves from this super-special land …death to America!”

Signed
Hit man for Allah

Hening on October 17, 2008 at 9:34 AM

Who purpled their finger for Sistani? Strange democracy that bows to unelected religious figures. Oh yeah, I forgot, it’s a sharia state wearing democracy as a disguise, just like Iran.

BL@KBIRD on October 17, 2008 at 9:57 AM

I thought Iraq didn’t have a functioning government. Isn’t that Mr. Obama’s party line? Now I find that the titular head of that nonfunctioning government is doing some form of internal diplomacy.

This has to be fake!

But the internal diplomacy is with a religious leader. Shouldn’t we now be concerned that religious considerations are infiltrating this nonfunctioning government? Isn’t that something that goes completely against the grain of the concept of separation of church and state?

Do we even want to consider supporting a nonfunctioning government which imposes its will via fatwa?

unclesmrgol on October 17, 2008 at 10:33 AM

I thought Iraq didn’t have a functioning government. Isn’t that Mr. Obama’s party line? Now I find that the titular head of that nonfunctioning government is doing some form of internal diplomacy.

Jalal Talabani is the President (i.e. titular head) of Iraq.

aengus on October 17, 2008 at 1:20 PM