http://www.nextgenerationcorp.com/NextGenBlog/?p=68

Poll finds American reject redistribution of wealth as suggested by Barack Hussein Obama.

PRINCETON, NJ — When given a choice about how government should address the numerous economic difficulties facing today’s consumer, Americans overwhelmingly — by 84% to 13% — prefer that the government focus on improving overall economic conditions and the jobs situation in the United States as opposed to taking steps to distribute wealth more evenly among Americans.

Read: http://www.gallup.com/poll/108445/Americans-Oppose-Income-Redistribution-Fix-Economy.aspx

Americans Oppose Income Redistribution to Fix Economy

[Note: Elect John McCain for a free America and economic growth.]

McCain can still win this thing. Joe the Plumber gave him a gift that is priceless and he needs to drive it home.

Fannie and Freddie love Senator Government.

Senator Government will raise your taxes

Senator Government wants to take over your health care

Senator Government wants to redistribute wealth.

Senator Government wants to increase spending even with a huge defecit

Just keep hammering on Senator Government until every time somebody sees and Obama picture that is what comes into their heads.

Obama lost as bad as the Dodgers.

ManlyRash on October 16, 2008 at 4:28 PM

Pardon me, if I don’t take your word for it.

btw. How many mccain points do you get for your quality insights?

For Conservatives, Fairness=Justice.
For the left, Fairness=Egalitarianism.

Fairness= Some pigs are more equal than others…

neuquenguy on October 16, 2008 at 2:41 PM

fixed it for ya!

Angry Dumbo on October 16, 2008 at 4:17 PM

Spare yourself the keystrokes and us the agita of having to read your whiny bilge. McCain is going to win. Period. Get used to it.

Badger40 on October 16, 2008 at 1:22 PM

We agree that McCain is the better candidate, I would disagree that McCain can point to his service record alone and get elected. Although I most definitely did not support him in the primaries (Rudy and/or Romney were preferable candidates), I have come to accept McCain as the best of the alternatives. The candidate is not the problem here. With apologies to Don Rumsfeld, you have to go into the general election with the candidate you have, not the candidate you would prefer.

The McCain campaign has been rudderless and defensive since the primaries.

- McCain’s life experience shoud be an asset, but has been effectively turned because McCain doesn’t like to talk about his service. Since when? McCain’s service was front and center in the primaries.

- Hillary’s protracted primary battle with Obama was a gift that the McCain camp squandered. He could have been hammering Obama’s inexperience and youthful naivete along with Hillary back in June.

- Refusing to touch Rev. Wright this Spring effectively precluded McCain from bringing up Ayers, Rezko, Odinga, and Soros. Buying into the Obama narrative that to challenge Rev. Wright’s liberation theology was racist, it follows that discussions of avowed Marxists and domestic terrorists was likewise coded racism.

- McCain’s style of Senatorial civility was not shared by Obama when he ran ads insinuating that McCain was too old to operate a computer.

The McCain camp’s reluctance to go on the offensive calls into doubt not only their will to win but their competence as potential party leaders.

judicial nominations: …Obama said he would look for “fairness”…

That is what I don’t understand. What is the “fairness” litmus test?

According to whose standards?

Sir Napsalot on October 16, 2008 at 2:24 PM

For Conservatives, Fairness=Justice.
For the left, Fairness=Egalitarianism.

judicial nominations: …Obama said he would look for “fairness”…

That is what I don’t understand. What is the “fairness” litmus test?

According to whose standards?

To me it illustrated the smoothness and skill of Obama’s lying and how foreign that is to McCain.

On a side note Schieffer was MUCH better than the other moderators. He made the debate about the candidates, not himself.

I think McCain closed the gap. He got back to basics. He needs to start hitting the Dems over Fannie Mae and ACORN and he really can pull it off. And if he does it right, he can take Congress back too. Let’s not forget they’ve got a 10% approval rating. On what planet do they get a bigger majority? He doesn’t have to stay on Ayers, let Sarahcuda handle that. He needs to stay on the economy and national security.

Joe the Plumber is the real game changer.

I disagree. McCain jabbed at issues. He telegraphed his punches and threw 0.0 combination punches. I agree with Rod Dreher that McCain looked at all times to be irritated and off his game. He appeared to me to have a punch list of “must cover” topics and he was just checking boxes. In the work place we call this minimum competence. McCain tonight was better than the McCain of the first two debates. Yet his performance was minimally competent, he was raising issues and painting narratives he should have raised and painted 3 months ago. McCain has been dining out on his war hero status for over 30 years now, the bill has finally come due.

If nothing else, last night established the Republican Party needs new YOUNGER leadership.

Angry Dumbo on October 16, 2008 at 10:56 AM

Well I guess I don’t see it that way. I am not impressed by how well a person can ‘perform’ during a debate. I like to hear what they say. I look for substance, not a ‘performance’. We are not talent scouting here.
It would be great to have all in one package:the smooth speaker, confident in appearance at all times, knowledgeable, knowledgeable at the drop of a hat, surrounds themselves with principled, hardworking, & those with upright character, etc…
McCain is not my 1st choice, but he does tell the truth. He is a principled man who sticks by his guns & will fight for what he knows is right, even if it’s unpopular. I respect that about him.
So the ‘performance’ is all showmanship. I could tell he was angry and anxious last night, but I read it as “I’m frustrated with the lies & misrepresentations about me & what he says he has said”. I would have felt the same tension.
I could also care less if McCain needs a walker or not. It’s his wisdom & experience we need, not his legs or arms.

There were several times that he was caught off guard, stumbled, and at least once where he was just plain stumped, unable to respond for several seconds.
That’s composed?

Count to 10 on October 16, 2008 at 10:29 AM

Yes, McCain put him on the ropes several times, specially with abortion, Ayers, ACORN and school vouchers. But the problem is that once he had him on the ropes he did not finish him off, he let Obama slither off with some lame comeback and moved on to another subject. If McCain had kept retorting on these issues he would really have left Obama stumbling badly.

Obama:

Snake-oil salesman.
Snake charmer.
Snake in the grass.

Did he dispel those notions last night? No.

JiangxiDad on October 16, 2008 at 8:37 AM

As Tom Anderson said in 1878,

“The best way to see a snake in the grass is to cut the grass.”

It’s about time McCain got out the lawn mower and did some serious cutting. He’s only got a few weeks left to expose Obama for what he truly is.