Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


McCain’s new economic plan

posted at 8:50 am on October 14, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

John McCain has new proposals to soften the blow for Americans rocked by the financial instability of the past few weeks — especially for seniors.  McCain offers both lowered capital-gains taxes and higher deductions for stock losses, both of which will help retirees managing their 401(k) and other investment vehicles for their income.  The lowered capital-gains rate will also help boost re-investment:

Republican presidential nominee John McCain will unveil proposals Tuesday aimed at helping Americans cope with a sharp plunge in the stock market, including tax relief for senior investors.

The proposals, to be outlined by McCain in Pennsylvania, come as the Arizona senator tries to close a gap with Democrat Barack Obama, who leads in national polls and in several key states with three weeks to go until election day on November 4.

McCain economic adviser Doug Holtz-Eakin told Reuters that McCain would outline an estimated $52.5 billion in new proposals.

The cost estimate comes from a static analysis of the various proposals.  We’ve talked about static analysis before; it assumes that tax policy has no effect on the market and therefore doesn’t take into account any economic stimulus or slowdown that results from the policy.  Tax increases therefore overestimate revenues, while tax cuts overestimate revenue shortfalls, and this estimate does the same thing.

McCain will propose the following, from his press release this morning:

  • John McCain Proposes That Withdrawals From Tax-Preferred Accounts - IRAs And 401(k)s - Should Be Taxed At The Lowest Rate - 10 Percent - In 2008 And 2009. This policy will apply to the first $50,000 withdrawn from these accounts each year and will affect the accounts of nearly nine million Americans over the age of 60, permitting them to devote more of their income to retirement needs.
  • John McCain Has Called To Suspend The Tax Rules That Force Seniors To Sell Their Stocks In The Midst Of The Most Grave Financial Crisis Of Our Lifetime. Under current law, Americans with tax-preferred IRA and 401(k) accounts must begin to sell off their equities when they reach age 70½ – unless they continue to work, in which case they must sell when they retire. Forcing seniors to sell at this time guarantees less to live on during retirement and could affect over four million seniors. John McCain believes this should be immediately waived.
  • John McCain Will Not Penalize Those Forced To Sell Off In Today’s Tough Markets. John McCain believes that we should increase the amount of capital losses which can be used in tax years 2008 and 2009 to offset ordinary income from $3,000 to $15,000.
  • John McCain Will Strengthen Incentives To Save, Invest, And Restore The Liquidity Of Markets. John McCain proposes a reduction in the maximum tax rate on long term capital gains to 7.5 percent in 2009 and 2010.

These proposals make a lot of sense, both in the short term and in the long term.  With the turmoil in the markets at the moment, the forced sale of stock from retirement portfolios could be disastrous for retirees.  Raising the capital-loss ceiling to $15,000 will keep the failure from hitting the small investors as hard.  The drop in in the capital-gains tax rate will do the most, though, in encouraging more investment in the economy and discourage people from sheltering capital from the current storm.  That could fuel a boost to the economy that would help buffer us from recession, or at least shorten a recession that has probably already begun.

Team McCain also includes the mortgage purchase strategy they announced during the last debate.  We’ve already covered this, but the release puts a little more meat on the bone:

The McCain Resurgence Plan Would Purchase Mortgages Directly From Homeowners And Mortgage Servicers, And Replace These Mortgages With Manageable, Fixed-Rate Mortgages That Will Keep Families In Their Homes. By purchasing the existing, failing mortgages the McCain resurgence plan will eliminate uncertainty over defaults, support the value of mortgage-backed derivatives and alleviate risks that are freezing financial markets.

The McCain Resurgence Plan Would Be Available To Mortgage Holders Who Live In Their Primary Residence And Can Prove Their Creditworthiness At The Time Of The Original Loan. The new mortgage would be an FHA-guaranteed fixed-rate mortgage at terms manageable for the homeowner.How The Program Works:

· An American buys a house that is his or her primary residence for $250,000 with a conservative, 20 percent downpayment ($50,000 down).

· His or her community property values fall by 30 percent, leaving him or her with a home worth $175,000 and a mortgage still worth $200,000.

· Under the McCain Plan, their mortgage would be retired, and they would receive a new, FHA guaranteed, 30-year fixed mortgage, at a low interest rate that reflects historical norms and the current market value of his home.

The Direct Cost Of This Plan Would Be About $300 Billion And Will Represent A Portion Of The $700 Billion Provided By Congress In The Recent Financial Market Stabilization Bill. The purchase of mortgages would relieve homeowners of “negative equity” in some homes. By stabilizing mortgages it will likely be possible to avoid some purposes previously assumed needed in that bill.

That would direct much of the funding for the bailout of mortgage-backed securities to the actual homeowners rather than the investors who bought the securities.  That would indirectly stabilize the MBSs while not providing a direct bailout to the speculators who built derivatives on derivatives.  It’s not a great solution — there simply isn’t any “great solution” to be had — but if the bailout exists, it’s not a bad direction in which to take it.  Keeping it limited to primary residences (no investment properties) and only those homeowners who would have qualified for the mortgage under normal lending rules helps weed out the people who took unnecessary risks, while supporting those who got victimized by the government-created housing bubble.

All in all, not bad — a plan designed to fix the economy as well as rescue individuals by lowering the tax burden.  Now McCain needs to communicate just that in his rollout.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Do you understand the concept of “Binary,” High Hopes?

It’s on or off. Zero or One. This or the other. It’s one of two choices.

While the republican primary was ongoing, people were discussing which candidate ideological was their best ideological match. Now that the republican primaries are over, we are now at the phase of the general election.

And I feel I need to point this out to you – where most people are capable of understanding this without any outside help whatsoever. And that is this:

You get one vote. Millions of people will be voting. The choice is Barack Obama and Joe Biden. OR. John McCain and Sarah Palin.

You get to pick one, because one of the two will be the next president. And yo useem to feel compelled in living in the past when the republican primary was still going on. What other illusions are you under? That there is a santa claus? That there is a tooth fairy? How much of reality do you reject, and substitute your own for? I;d like to know.

wise_man on October 14, 2008 at 11:43 AM

. In either case, your posts are a waste of everybody’s time because they don’t represent opinion, they represent RNC propaganda
highhopes on October 14, 2008 at 11:36 AM

And what do your posts represent? Trashing McCain? To what end? Who do you want to see become the next president?

wise_man on October 14, 2008 at 11:45 AM

Where do you get the idea the government has the right to step in and cancel contracts between people?

Vashta.Nerada

Yes, this is the most frightening part of the various plans. Scrappleface nailed it. It’s a bloodless coup. The Rule of Law is gone. We will spend the rest of our lives trying to figure out who we can bail out next to make life “fair and reasonable and equal.”

If McCain really wants to restore confidence, he could use another bullet point:
In order to restore trust in the financial system, we will prosecute those in government and business who used fraud and deception to enrich themselves and will repeal the laws and regulations that gave them the right to do it.

PattyJ on October 14, 2008 at 11:49 AM

The Rule of Law is gone. We will spend the rest of our lives trying to figure out who we can bail out next to make life “fair and reasonable and equal.”

thats right! thats whats happens when you abandon principles.

will repeal the laws and regulations that gave them the right to do it.

oh no, that would be RAACIST…its pathetic isn’t it? we’ve ’solved’ the problem, by throwing money at it and hoping it goes away….I think we’ve just set ourselves up for a bigger fall later…I’m at the point where I say let it fall…government isn’t my savior…

right4life on October 14, 2008 at 11:51 AM

If McCain really wants to restore confidence, he could use another bullet point:
In order to restore trust in the financial system, we will prosecute those in government and business who used fraud and deception to enrich themselves and will repeal the laws and regulations that gave them the right to do it.

PattyJ on October 14, 2008 at 11:49 AM

Of the four, Obama, Biden, McCain, Palin, I think there is only one that would really pursue prosecution…

CC

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 11:59 AM

All this is well and good intentioned, but how the hell do you pull it off with a democrat controlled congress??

N4646W on October 14, 2008 at 12:10 PM

10/14/2008 8:36:00 AM Email this article • Print this article

This is what my sister sent me from Australia this morning.

U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan speaks to the Sidney Rotary Club at Dorothy Love Retirement Community in the Amos Center on Monday. SDN Photo/Lucas Merrill

Jordan: U.S. economy still greatest in world

By Michael Everman
Staff Writer

Despite the stock market’s volatility in recent weeks and a $700 billion bailout for the financial sector approved by Congress, the United States is still the greatest economy in the world and will continue to be, according to U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Urbana.

Jordan was the guest speaker at the Sidney Rotary Club’s meeting held Monday at the Amos Center of Dorothy Love Retirement Community.

Despite being approved by Congress, Jordan said he felt there are fundamental problems with the bailout, which led him to vote against it twice. The two main problems with the bailout go against the principles of capitalism – using taxpayer dollars to help private companies and hurting those companies’ competitors in return by bailing them out, Jordan said.

“Using a big federal government approach was not the way to go,” he said. “With the exception of the military, the federal government doesn’t do anything very well.”

While he is a fan of President Bush’s stance on national defense, tax cuts and traditional-family values, there is one area Jordan said Bush has not handled well.

“When it comes to spending, (Bush) has failed miserably,” Jordan said. “We have to get a handle on federal spending.”

After 22 months in office, he has seen quite a bit of change on what issues are important. Currently, the economy is the No. 1 issue, but when he first started, immigration was getting all of the attention, he said. Then the surge brought the war in Iraq back into focus. About four to two months ago, energy was on everyone’s mind.

“We are still the greatest economy in the world,” Jordan said, “but you can’t be the No. 1 economy without energy and you can’t be the No. 1 military in the world without the No. 1 economy. The U.S. needs to continue to be the world leader.

“America always figures out how to win, we’ll do that with terrorism and now with the economy.”

Not sure what to think of his plan. He still is the best man that we have to choose from. Better this then to have to redistribute our money to lazy ignorant fools that want a free ride. Also, think of all the illegals we will be supporting also. Is that fair?

sheebe on October 14, 2008 at 12:12 PM

rockmom on October 14, 2008 at 9:06 AM

Great post. We must and cannot give up!

sheebe on October 14, 2008 at 12:15 PM

wise_man on October 14, 2008 at 11:43 AM

The only people who want you to believe it is ONLY a binary decision set, are the Reps and the Dems.

There is NOTHING in the Constitution that says this is ONLY a two party system.

As a Registered Independent, I reserve the RIGHT to vote for whoever the heck I want, and all your yelling and accusations will not change that.

I also reverve my RIGHT to Freedom of Speech, which says I can say what I want about any candidate running. Last time I checked this was a Conservative leaning Blog, not a McCain Campaign Website.

YOUR type of rhetoric, is why reasonable people stay out of politics… you’ve got 10% of the extremes on BOTH sides who yell and scream so much, that they drown out any reasonable discourse.

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 12:28 PM

I also reverve my RIGHT to Freedom of Speech, which says I can say what I want about any candidate running. Last time I checked this was a Conservative leaning Blog, not a McCain Campaign Website.

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 12:28 PM

And it follows that if this is a conservative leaning blog and there are TWO (2) candidates for President, you might expect the support would tend towards the more conservative of them. To go to a “conservative leaning blog” at this point and knock the more conservative of the two is simply to astroturf.

CC

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 12:34 PM

The Fair Tax program would be ideal also. I don’t think McCain likes it. He doesn’t understand it. Just like Capps of Ca. I wrote her a year ago about The Fair Tax. Of course as greedy as she is. She did write back. But that would take her pork away. It has been tested for a long time. Proven to work. I think the percentage might be a tad high. But that is my opinion. Would still be a great tool to use. All I know is that I am very worried and have trouble sleeping at nights. McCain has to win this. We have no choice. We need to save our Country.

sheebe on October 14, 2008 at 12:42 PM

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 12:34 PM

Excuse me, but your conservative leaning candidate is now openly espousing and supporting some very Socialistic ideas.

And if these are not talked about NOW… if its not somehow made clear NOW that there is opposition to his stance, it will continue, and get worse.

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 12:45 PM

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 12:34 PM

And once more, just for the sake of clarity, there WILL be more than two candidates on the ballot…

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 12:47 PM

There is NOTHING in the Constitution that says this is ONLY a two party system. Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 12:28 PM

For the 2004 election, 62,040,610 people voted for Bush. 59,028,444 people voted for John Kerry. Bush’s 286 electoral votes defeated Kerry’s 251.

When I say that either McCain or Obama is going to be the next president, I am not lying to you. When you claim that this is not the case, you are denying reality. You need to pick one. And one of the two will win. And the other will lose. You have the freedom to vote for whoever you want. In that same election, the largest number of votes for an independent candidate was 465,650. And got zero electoral votes. He was and continues to be a laughing stock by everyone in politics.

You can say whatever you want, You can claim that I am trying to stop your freedom of speech, but nothing could be further from the truth.

wise_man on October 14, 2008 at 12:47 PM

And once more, for the sake of your sanity, voting for them will remove you from the political process as much as if you decided to stay home on election day and watch cartoons, Romeo13.

wise_man on October 14, 2008 at 12:48 PM

And once more, just for the sake of clarity, there WILL be more than two candidates on the ballot…

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 12:47 PM

Yep. There certainly will. But only two with a chance of winning. As you have expressed your concern for your rights, your fears are (currently) misplaced. You are (currently) free to vote for Barr or Nader or ?????. The central fact reamains that is UNDENIABLE, to not vote for McCain is to help put Obama in office.

CC

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 12:50 PM

Offering socialist money to you and me
Just makes McCainie look as silly as can be
Rearranging deck chairs on the McTitanic
Just shows that he is in a full surge panic
For 2008, scroomed are we

MB4 on October 14, 2008 at 12:58 PM

And once more, for the sake of your sanity, voting for them will remove you from the political process as much as if you decided to stay home on election day and watch cartoons, Romeo13.

wise_man on October 14, 2008 at 12:48 PM

Ah… please continue the personal attacks, they sooooo help you make your point.

The fact of the matter is that the two political partys are part of the problem, and not the solution. You give me NO reason to vote FOR McCain, but just want me to vote AGAINST Obama.

System is broken, and until people are given a third, or fourth, alternative to the current two partys, it will continue to remain broken.

Bush is BLATANTLY putting forward Socialist policys, and McCain is supporting him on them. So you give me the choice of voting for a GREATER Socialist (Obama) or a lesser Socialist (McCain).

Voting is the ultimate expression of Freedom of Expression… giving my vote to someone is supporting THEM and their POLICIES. Your binary decision set has given us the largest increase in Government Spending and Power ever, and BOTH candidates running now will continue in that.

Sorry, you may not like it, but McCain is part of the problem, not the solution, and his current stances on the economy are not CONSERVATIVE. Its McCain/Kennedy and McCain/Feingold all over again… and I will not support him with my vote if he continues.

The power structure in this country will not change until enough American voters make it clear to the politicians that we want another direction… Both Candidates talk about change, but neither want to change us BACK to what made America great in the first place…

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 1:01 PM

And here’s another one. It’s amusing to watch as so many arrive from the clown car.

wise_man on October 14, 2008 at 1:03 PM

Voting is the ultimate expression of Freedom of Expression… giving my vote to someone is supporting THEM and their POLICIES. Your binary decision set has given us the largest increase in Government Spending and Power ever, and BOTH candidates running now will continue in that.

Sorry, you may not like it, but McCain is part of the problem, not the solution, and his current stances on the economy are not CONSERVATIVE. Its McCain/Kennedy and McCain/Feingold all over again… and I will not support him with my vote if he continues.

The power structure in this country will not change until enough American voters make it clear to the politicians that we want another direction… Both Candidates talk about change, but neither want to change us BACK to what made America great in the first place…

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 1:01 PM

Not very pragmatic, are we. I was a “true believer” in voting strictly according to principle in ‘92. How could Bush say “Read my lips! No new taxes!” and then raise taxes. Well, I showed him… I voted for Perot. That worked really well. I have since learned that keeping my head above water, no matter how slightly above the surface, is always better than drowning. Stated more plainly, I grew up.

CC

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 1:09 PM

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 1:09 PM

You do realize that Perot, getting 15% of the vote, FORCED both political partys to the center, and forced them to balance the budget for a few years?

It was not on either party’s agenda UNTIL Perot became a threat to the status quo.

And once he was no longer a threat? The balanced budget and fiscal conservatism went the way of the Dodo.

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 1:29 PM

Ross Perot’s defeat at the polls and siphoning votes from Bush to Bill Clinton’s benefit “forced them to balance the budget for a few years?”

Wow. You really are amazing. Some psychiatrist should study you. Might be able to write a book on what he finds.

wise_man on October 14, 2008 at 1:34 PM

wise_man on October 14, 2008 at 1:34 PM

Nice snark…

So, please, in your infinite wisdom, please take the way back machine back to that time, and tell me which political party made the balanced budget an issue?

The Reps and Dems did not even have it on their Radar until Perot showed up with his charts.

When he had a strong showing, the Republicrats saw that there was an existential threat to their two party monopoly on power, and saw the way the wind was blowing. They were forced to balance the budget to rid themselves of the threat.

Clinton even said afterwards that he was forced to Govern as a moderate….

But please, continue to disparage those of us who actualy pay a bit of attention to history… especialy history we lived through.

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 1:42 PM

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 1:29 PM

You do realize that Perot made a man President that only got 43% of the vote? History is clear… no Perot… President Bush. The country was forced the direction it went by Newt’s House and the Contract With America (that should have been renewed every two years!) period.

CC

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 1:45 PM

Hey here’s an idea, how about LOWERING THE CORPORATE TAX RATE!

rattrap47 on October 14, 2008 at 1:53 PM

Clinton even said afterwards that he was forced to Govern as a moderate….

Clinton has a habit of saying a lot of things that are complete fabrications.

wise_man on October 14, 2008 at 2:02 PM

Clinton has a habit of saying a lot of things that are complete fabrications.

wise_man on October 14, 2008 at 2:02 PM

like…. “I worked harder than I’ve ever worked but I just have to raise your taxes”… yeah, that was his immediate dash to the “center”.

CC – BHO: “My Muslim faith”

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 2:05 PM

If the Dems lowered the Corporate tax rate. We might get companies to come back. But they want to deprive us. Make us beg. Just think of the crime that decent people will probably do now. Many women will do acts that they never would have thought about. It is survival. This redistribute sh*t is going to put us in another third world. I sure the heck hope not. Having more than two parties won’t do any good. This time every vote for Rep. is very important. It is dire.

sheebe on October 14, 2008 at 2:05 PM

This time every vote for Rep. is very important. It is dire.

sheebe on October 14, 2008 at 2:05 PM

Exactly we have all the trolls/astroturfers trying to suppress turnout.

CC – BHO: “My Muslim faith”

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 2:07 PM

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 2:07 PM

ah… the new Islamophobe/BDS type of comment…

or… I will come up with a snarky name for you because you disagree with me…

How… interesting.

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 2:25 PM

ah… the new Islamophobe/BDS type of comment…

or… I will come up with a snarky name for you because you disagree with me…

How… interesting.

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 2:25 PM

Do that… of all the things Obama has said and done, it has just struck me lately that the most curious was on that George S. interview…. George immediately corrected him, but I am completely open to ANY explaination of how a “practicing Christian” that has attended a specific church for over 20 years could say that. I’m certainly as guilty of the next of slips of the tongue, but this seems to have blown completely over and I STILL don’t understand how you make that particular slip of the tongue.

’splain it to me? I don’t know of any other Christian that has made that particular slip. My mind is completely open to any plausible explaination.

CC

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 2:31 PM

oops…

CC – BHO: “My Muslim faith”

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 2:32 PM

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 2:31 PM

“Exactly we have all the trolls/astroturfers trying to suppress turnout.”

Sorry if I was not clear, but my comment was about YOUR use of the troll/astroturfer name to try to belittle those who have a different view.

IE, troll/astroturfer is the new BDS/Islamophobe/Chickenhawk meme…

Same tactic… different day…

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 2:40 PM

Sorry if I was not clear, but my comment was about YOUR use of the troll/astroturfer name to try to belittle those who have a different view.

IE, troll/astroturfer is the new BDS/Islamophobe/Chickenhawk meme…

Same tactic… different day…

Romeo13 on October 14, 2008 at 2:40 PM

And that those slamming McCain don’t really want to suppress turnout, it just falls under the category of collateral damage. I can see that Nov 5 is tooooo far away to hold back… sort of like kids and Christmas.

CC

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 2:45 PM

forgot again…

CC – BHO: “My Muslim faith”

CapedConservative on October 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM

McCain could hit a home run and maybe just pull of a stunning upset if he would come out full force for the FairTax.

I’d agree, except that all the MSM has to do is suggest that “homeowners would lose their tax deduction for home interest” and the concept is toast. Even those that are in homes and aren’t paying any interest (wink: one of those “special” loans that Frank/Dodd love so much) will buy into the idea that the FairTax is a bad idea.

I’ve been ready for the FairTax for years, but when you have the current tax code and the IRS to enforce it, why would any socialist want to kill off their glorious primary mechanism for the redistribution of wealth? Just ask Barry about his “tax cuts for 95% of Americans”, a crown jewel in his Marxist schemes.

electric-rascal on October 15, 2008 at 12:10 AM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.