Shelby on October 13, 2008 at 5:00 AM
First, I understood your complaint to one of general terms. Well, I’m glad to see you support the thinning of baby seals.

But you totally missed the point. Why do you think these wolves are being thinned out? Because there are too many of them and they are decimating other species. They are the top of the food chain and have no natural enemies.

It’s too bad you put more focus on wolves and less on humans. A vote against McCain is a vote for Oslime-a. He happens to be the guy who approves of the practice of leaving babies to die on ash bins.

How utterly humane of you. You must be so proud to be part of a movement to push people away from McCain.

csdeven on October 13, 2008 at 8:54 AM

Let me try once again to help you understand, okay?! High numbers of voters, Indies, Repubs and Dems are moving over to Obama because of Sarah Pain! Got it yet????!!!! The public does NOT support the cruelty she endorses by hunting down wolves to exhaustion by low-flying planes and riddling them with bullets! THIS IS NOT A HUMANE WAY TO KILL WOLVES AND BARRACUDA SUPPORTS IT! Regardless if there are too many of them [can’t let them be free preying on their natural diet because this takes away from tourists being able to kill the caribou instead!], this is NOT THE HUMANE WAY TO DEAL WITH IT! Polar Queen polls in the net minus 20s. If you folks had brains you would care about this!

My conscience is completely clear because I did not, and will not, in the GE vote for any of these losers. Those of you who did, well do a moral conscience check of your own!

And there will be no babies left on shelves to die BECAUSE CONGRESS PASSED A BILL AGAINST THIS YEARS AGO, and Obama, not being that stupid, has surely learned his lesson that having this horrible baggage did not and will not help him win votes!

Now if only the extreme-righties could learn needed lessons!

http://www.nick.com/kpp/

(The last two presidential elections, they did this, and of course Gore and Kerry both won in landslides.)

Rudy Gulliani wouldn’t be bad as VP only because he can REALLY kick some a** on the trail.

Goodeye_Closed on October 13, 2008 at 12:21 PM

Is being pro-life important to you?! If so, why would you support Gulliani whom is pro-choice and dresses up in woman’s clothes and has martial affairs?

Romney is pro-life, does not wear girly clothes and can certainly kick some a** cuz he knows what he’s talking about!

Are you a bigot?

Ok…I only needed Shelby to endorse that ticket before I post anything against it (proof positive of my correct assesment)

Romney should NOT be our candidate in 2012….at least for true conservatives who won’t be shaped by popular opinion and fluffy, get-along GOP main streamers.

Romney went from being a liberal RHINO to a hardened conservative when he decided to run for prez (sound familiar…ahem,.. McCain) These types ALWAYS fold under pressure from our marxist media and career liberal politicians. I just don’t trust anyone with two distinctively different set of ideals depending on what they are running for.

My list to head the ticket includes Fred Thompson or Newt Gingrich for the time being.

Rudy Gulliani wouldn’t be bad as VP only because he can REALLY kick some a** on the trail.

(I wonder if a ticket flip is legal, since it’s unprecedented.)

So what’s with the latest shift in the pols? I thought McLame was getting trounced, and now it appears the gap is closing? WTF?

Wyznowski on October 13, 2008 at 10:31 AM

There’s an interesting post on HillBuzz about “internals” showing McCain leading in FL, IN, OH, NC, VA, and PA, as of October 10. Here’s the link:

http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/page/4/

Republicans and centrist Democrats are joined together on this effort to get the truth out about Obama before the November election. We firmly believe in McCain’s victory and do not believe it hinges on any developments with RICO. The polls, in our opinon, are wrong, and the internal numbers we see coming out of NC, VA, PA, OH, IN and FL show McCain wins in all of those states (there is no mathematical possibility for Obama to win without taking PA, OH, or FL).

H/T Hillbuzz.wordpress.com

I have no idea whether the claims of “HillBuzz” are correct regarding internals–Hillbuzz seems to think there will soon be some action by prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald on a RICO case against ACORN and the Obama campaign for thuggish behavior during the Democrat primaries.

But if the McCain campaign has “internal” (non-public) polling showing they are leading in the six states mentioned above (PA would definitely be a surprise!!!), that might explain their campaign strategy. Palin has been in Florida a lot lately, then went to PA. McCain has been in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Ohio, and Iowa!!! Why is he going there? Is he barking up the wrong tree, or does his campaign know something we don’t know, and is trying to steal an unexpected state from Obama, just in case he loses Colorado? Don’t know for sure, but food for thought.

Besides, the ACORN shenanigans in Ohio are public knowledge, with a judge issuing a restraining order on the Ohio Secretary of State, so McCain might know that some middle-of-the-road Ohioans are turning against Obama over voter fraud.

As for Palin wanting McCain to get tougher, Palin has publicly stated (to Sean Hannity) that she admires the woman who said,

“Now is no time to go wobbly, George!”–Margaret Thatcher.

He could be right it certainly is a new style but then this is a very different election season.

The old way was way more fun and I would have preferred Romney, a real fighter. We will have Mel Martinez and the RNC to thank if this gambit doesn’t pan out. Now we have to drag the stubborn DONKEY across the finish line most likely kickin and screamin.
Go Sarah!

Shelby on October 13, 2008 at 5:00 AM

First, I understood your complaint to one of general terms. Well, I’m glad to see you support the thinning of baby seals.

But you totally missed the point. Why do you think these wolves are being thinned out? Because there are too many of them and they are decimating other species. They are the top of the food chain and have no natural enemies.

It’s too bad you put more focus on wolves and less on humans. A vote against McCain is a vote for Oslime-a. He happens to be the guy who approves of the practice of leaving babies to die on ash bins.

How utterly humane of you. You must be so proud to be part of a movement to push people away from McCain.

Sure wish he would have told his voters he wasnt going to fight hard in the primaries.

After all “honor” to McCain now is “losing gracefully”.
Okay McCain you are a good loser – satisfied?

It worked for BJ Clinton, getting Buddy, as a media distraction at the onset of the Monica scandal.

Well it kinda helped. The libs loved seeing him playing with his new puppy and that gained some sympathy for him, but of course, the Monica BJ thing failed to deflate for years.

Shelby on October 12, 2008 at 4:41 PM

Spare us your inability to deal with the facts of life. You want to save seals? Then go get their parents to practice birth control.

csdeven on October 12, 2008 at 4:58 PM

csdeven, I fear for your reasoning abilities. Save baby seals? Where in my post did I say anything about baby seals?! My post was regarding Sarah Pain’s support for a barbaric method of killing wolves. Here it is again to help your understanding:

The TV ads showing the barbaric chasing to exhaustion and shooting of wolves, which Ice-Princess supports?

Go ahead and bury your head in the sand and just write off the votes from Indies (like myself), Repubs and Dems who see that ad and the pics of Barracuda with the bloody moose she killed, and are repulsed by her. These are the only images we have of her with God’s creatures. She seems to have no use for any animal other than to kill it or have it killed. She’s one mean-cold b*itch, and yeah, I know she did not abort either her first child out of wedlock or her special needs baby. Yippee! That’s admirable, but many women, such as myself, are BOTH pro-life and pro-humane treatment of God’s creatures.

Barracuda is nothing special or unique by not having aborted her babies–millions and millions of other women in this world have also chosen life under difficult circumstances. You extreme-righters need to get a clue that there is a lot more to a candidate’s character than whether she pops out kids, has abortions, or does not.

Now, I’ll laugh if suddenly we see a “softer, more appealing” Sarah with a new little doggy in the desperate days before the election! It worked for BJ Clinton, getting Buddy, as a media distraction at the onset of the Monica scandal.

But Ice-Princess would have a hard time convincing the public when we’ve seen no sign of her EVER having had any use for a live animal other than to kill it.

PalinRomney/Jindal….2012…oh, and wouldn’t it be nice to have a hardhittting, articulate conservative for once? God Bless America

texaninfidel on October 12, 2008 at 5:20 PM

A Romney/Jindal ticket would be awesome and very coherent!

Shelby is a girl-fag. Please stop responding to it.

Fortunata on October 12, 2008 at 10:40 PM

Ooooooh, classy Fortunata! That’ll bring voters over to the McCain/Pain ticket!

Some of you really are beyond pathetic in that all you can do is respond with vile comments when someone makes a legit point about your beloved Sarah Pain. Low intelligence on display…

If the MSM is so successful in leading sheep to vote for the zero Obummer, there will still be sheep in 4 years that will believe the Democratic mammoth lie that “All of this was leftovers from the Bush administration”/”We didn’t know it was this bad until we got into office”

The sheep will give Barry 4 more years to make perfect his socialist utopia of Amerika, which will take 30 to 50 years to nullify.

“We’re gonna spread happiness,
we’re gonna spread freedom,
Obama’s gonna change it,
Obama’s gonna lead, em.”
“We’re gonna change, it!”
“And rearrange it!”
“We’re gonna change the world.”

I wonder, how these “conservatives, who don’t have a dog in the fight” will yelp, when they’re having Socialized Medicine shoved up their tail-end?

franksalterego on October 12, 2008 at 4:21 PM

They’ll be able to steel themselves during their 6-month wait for the procedure.

trailboss-

Anyone read any good books lately?

“Causacus- Mountain Men and Holy Wars” by Nicolas Griffin, “Creative Minds In Desperate Times” by Webb Garrison, and “Slabs of the Sunburnt West” by Carl Sandburg.

Not in that order.

GD-it McCain, FIGHT for the free market and our national economy because an Obama win will further cripple it with taxes, spending and regulations!

FIGHT for free speech since an Obama win will lead to the Fairness Doctrine and the death of Talk Radio and conservative blogs and the advancement of intimidation and suppression of our free speech rights!

FIGHT for our national security since an Obama win will mean an accomomdationist globalist agenda that will embolden our adversaries and harm our nation!

FIGHT dangit, fight, enough of this “My Friends” guff and “loss with honor.” The other side has no honor, and honors you not, McCain. They liked you when you were not a threat, and were a thorn in the GOP’s side as the “Maverick.” Now they hate you as they always have, and act on it as they did not until you threatened their power. Step it up, fight for me ’cause I’m not in a position to take it to them and resist them. That’s what YOU are supposed to do with my support. But if you won’t fight for it, the heck with you!!