Open thread: Wall Street; Update: Dow finishes down — slightly
posted at 9:19 am on October 10, 2008 by Allahpundit
It’s going to be a long, interesting, excruciating day, so let’s open a thread for chatter. Reading stuff like this and this feels like being told there’s a giant asteroid headed towards Earth and it’s probably going to hit but maybe not, so, you know, cross those fingers. For context:
“The closest I have seen to this in the last 10 to 20 years is the spike after 9/11,” said Richard Chaifetz, chief executive of ComPsych Corp., a Chicago-based company that coordinates mental health referrals for employers. “But this is more geographically dispersed and is not going to get better in a month.”
The Dow’s not the barometer of the underlying problem but it probably is a reasonably fair barometer of public panic, so that’s what we’re watching. The bell rings in 10 minutes. Exit question: Where will it close today?
Update: I’m guilty of this myself: “A second key factor is that some small investors in the US are throwing in the towel. It is thought that a lot of the overnight sell-off on Wall Street was driven by small investors cashing in mutual funds — the US equivalent of unit trusts — and forcing selling by fund managers in order to return cash to investors.”
Update: Down 521 in the first five minutes. Quote:
“We aren’t dealing with a fundamental economic issue any longer,” said James Paulsen, chief investment strategist for Wells Capital Management. “We are dealing with fear. And that doesn’t respond to economic medicine.”
Update: Much-needed optimism from Hugh Hewitt. I’m assuming that the bottom is approaching and that big investors are ready to go bargain hunting, but given that the underlying problem is with liquidity, who’s willing to sink cash back in?
After the first wave of panic selling, 10 minutes after the opening bell, it’s bounced back to -350 from about -700.
Update: In case you’re wondering. I feel faintly dizzy at the realization that we’re at the point of having to talk about this:
The Dow Jones industrial average would have to fall 1,100 points in a day to trigger the first halt [in trading]. Based on Thursday’s Dow close of 8,579, the threshold number to cause the market to stop on Friday would be 7,479. If that point is reached before 2 p.m., the market will shut down for an hour. If the threshold is breached between 2 p.m. and 2:30 p.m., the halt will last 30 minutes. No trading stops would take place if the plunge occurs after 2:30 p.m.
If the index were to fall 2,200 points before 1 p.m., the market would close for two hours. If such a decline took place between 1 p.m. and 2 p.m., there would be a one-hour pause. The market would close for the day if stocks sank to that level after 2 p.m.
In the event of a 3,350-point decline, the market would close for the day, regardless of the time.
It’s actually all the way back up to even at the moment.
Update: Tom Maguire expects a late afternoon rally in anticipation of good news from the G7 summit this weekend. Let’s hope; late afternoons haven’t been kind this week.
If you’re wondering where the bottom is historically for massive corrections, we’re pretty much there. But past results are no predictor of future etc etc etc.
Watch CBS Videos Online
Update: Maguire almost called it. The Dow was down around 450 at 3 p.m. when a monster rally broke and pushed it to +200 about five minutes before the closing bell. Whereupon it promptly dropped hundreds of points again. The exact number’s not set yet but it finished at around -120. Not good, but no crash, thank god.
This weekend’s task: Canned goods!










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 4 5 6
I believe that was bottom my friends. Now to rebuild this mess.
johnnyU on October 10, 2008 at 4:19 PM
johnnyU on October 10, 2008 at 4:19 PM
I hope you’re right.
kareyk on October 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM
I have 1500 dollars ready to invest. Anyone got any good stock tips and willing to handle my cash for me?
Vatican Watcher on October 10, 2008 at 4:28 PM
OK, now the big question…
The stock market was origionaly intended to allow companies to sell a part of their ownership, to raise capital.
It has now become one huge Vegas, where stock prices often have nothing to do with the company itself, but whether the guys with huge amounts of money to play with BET on the up/down.
There is NO way todays swing was caused by actualy investors… it was all institutional traders… and all done via computer.
Is it time to get the Stock market back to its origional intention, by instituting a Rule that once you buy a stock, you have to own it for at least 24 hours? And get rid of the short selling type of betting going on?
We need to get a handle on this Vegas, as the institutional Gamblers in the market are impacting main street… as 50% of people now own at least some stock.
Romeo13 on October 10, 2008 at 4:28 PM
I’m a financial adviser and have told my clients to move into cash and Treasurys on some long positions (owning the stock). Some stocks such as Apple, BofA, etc. have been hammered; however they are also valued cheap with respect to their future. This market isn’t being driven by reason, but by panic, and the endless media cycle screaming bloody murder.
We are seeing that the credit default swaps that supposedly did in Lehman had NOTHING to do with their bankruptcy. I really wish the mainstream media would shut their damn mouths. Half the country that has 401(k) investments see 5 minutes of CNN and immediately call their broker and demand to sell. Stupidity.
FLcapitalistthug on October 10, 2008 at 4:36 PM
Oh and Romeo13, you are completely wrong. Valuation has a lot to do with, and while I agree with you that there has been skittish trading based primarily on emotion, calling investing “Vegas” is one of the dumbest things I have heard in a while. My college degree and what I do all day have nothing to do with gambling.
FLcapitalistthug on October 10, 2008 at 4:38 PM
I disagree. Short sellers are a hint to management that they are on the wrong track. Buying and selling, no matter how long or short term, is about the only unfettered capitalism we have left. Buy and hold, don’t speculate, and you won’t get burned.
Vashta.Nerada on October 10, 2008 at 4:38 PM
Excellent point! The only money “made” on most stock transactions is between the paper-shufflers, and doesn’t benefit the company that issued the stock.
Likewise, it might be time to consider some of the strange practices designed solely to offer profit possibilities for market insiders. Stock “futures” and various devices (the names of which escape me) that deal with profiting from the profit/loss in stock sales have nothing to do with productivity or real money.
I think the vastly out-of-sync P/E ratios on many “hot” stocks have twisted things to the point that a major correction would have been necessary anyway. Reality always wins in the end.
Seems like the right moment to go back to the fundamentals: buy stock as a long-term investment, and because the corporate dividends make it profitable in the short-term.
MrScribbler on October 10, 2008 at 4:41 PM
If this is the beginning of the rally, you don’t need to rush in. There will most likely be a major pullback before things really take off.
I did great on banks today. I have lost so much in last year I think I have ice water in my veins now. There is an ebb and flow to the market and somehow, you have to believe that stocks will rally back. During the downturn today, I was buying as fast as I could. Small amounts, but bringing my average costs down.
Now I just have to hope nothing bad happens over the weekend.
huckleberryfriend on October 10, 2008 at 4:52 PM
Really? then please explain to me how todays market fluctuations happend?
And if P/E has so much to do with the market, then WHY is the WHOLE market tanking? Especialy companies that are fundamentaly strong?
Explain to me, with your College given knowledge, how the stock market can lose 40% of its worth, when the VAST majority of companies that make it up are NOT going out of business, or even loosing money?
Its become Vegas… and its based on whether you bet correctly on the money flow in and out of the market…
Romeo13 on October 10, 2008 at 4:57 PM
Sorry, but any CEO who runs their company based on the short term gains and losses of their stock, instead of business fundamentals, should be tossed out on their ears.
Short sellers don’t give a crap about how good the company is doing, its all about the up/down bet… just like betting Red and Black at Roulette.
Romeo13 on October 10, 2008 at 5:00 PM
Yeah. I seem to be thinking right too…..up 70% on a few experimental plays. Just dipping my toe in to get a taste.
LimeyGeek on October 10, 2008 at 5:10 PM
I am not an economist and have been doing my very best to try and understand all that is going on. Like reading Greek unfortunately. I ‘thought’ I was pretty broke a month or so ago. Just got my financials in the mail today…..holy shit! I am really really broke at the moment. Pray for no big emergency!!
dustoffmom on October 10, 2008 at 5:12 PM
Romeo13 on October 10, 2008 at 4:57 PM
The market fluctuations are unprecedented. By and large, the companies that have struggled are FUNDAMENTALLY HURTING. Case in point: GM, the worst performing DJIA component since last year, is in serious, serious trouble.
Their sales are projected to fall 25% in the next year.
I never said P/E is the reason why companies’ stocks do well or not. It’s a good indicator, but not the be-all end-all. Balance sheet health is a much better indicator of how the stock will perform in the future.
There’s no need to be reproachful about my “college given knowledge”, perhaps you were too busy balancing your afternoon shift at Pacific Sunwear and community college classes to finish college, both of which aren’t my fault.
The market has lost 40% because IT MAKES SENSE. Call Sens. Dodd, Schumer, et al. about why these toxic mortgages have become a cancer in our economy. Consumer spending is 2/3 of the American economy, thus it’s significantly affected when home values and bank balance sheets depreciate how they have.
Your comment about short sellers “betting” on the up/down movement of a stock evidences your lack of knowledge on the subject. Short sellers are, by definition, thinking that the stock will go down. I have shorted stocks for companies which I generally like, but have made bad moves and which I can make profits for my clients.
Keep thinking stocks are like Vegas and you will be vacationing in Newark, NJ for the rest of your life.
FLcapitalistthug on October 10, 2008 at 5:15 PM
Watching Ford made me wince
LimeyGeek on October 10, 2008 at 5:20 PM
Sorry dude… have a Bachelors myself… so your shot goes VERY wide of the mark… but then again, I went BACK to College after Retiring from the Navy, so I guess I wasn’t so much with Pacific Sunwear, as in the Pacific FLEET back then…
But please continue with your personal attacks, they are very amusing.
And my comment on short sellers show that I DO understand what they do, you are just looking for fault. A Short seller makes money on the down, not on the up… so they are betting on whether the stock goes up or down. Up they loose, down they win, thats the bet.
Oh, and just as an aside… I’ve never been to Newark, just around the world… TWICE… 6 out of 7 Continents…5 out of 7 Seas…. but please, continue your snark… as I said earlier… its amusing.
Romeo13 on October 10, 2008 at 5:29 PM
Romeo, thanks for informing me that short sellers make money on the way down. You should send me your resume, the portfolio managers that manage billions in my office could use perceptiveness like that. I admire your service to our country, but not your smugness. Stick to traveling the world, and leave the investing up to the ones that think finance is a rational industry, rather than the plaything of the rich.
Good luck in
Caesars Palacethe NYSE.FLcapitalistthug on October 10, 2008 at 5:39 PM
Dude, I am NOT the one who started the personal crap…
And I might add YOU accused me of not understanding what short sellers do… so now defending myself is considered being smug? Interesting…
And Good luck to you in you Office, as the portfolio managers continue to play in
VegasWallStreet with OPM (other peoples money).Being told by an Insider, someone who makes a living off the market, that everything is Fine, is like the Capt. of the Titanic bragging about his unsinkable ship….
Romeo13 on October 10, 2008 at 6:05 PM
I’m having a hard time squaring that with the reality of the the bankruptcies of many iconic institutions. The more we find out, the less likely it is that these people are rational.
csdeven on October 10, 2008 at 6:08 PM
I appreciate what someone wrote today.
“Why would anyone trust either candidate to help dig us out of this if they can’t speak frankly about what got us into it?
One had the sense this week that our entire political class is playing Frisbee on the edge of a precipice, that no one is being serious enough, honest enough, that it’s all too revved, too intense, and yet too shallow. I have grown impatient with the strategists from the campaigns, the little blond monsters who go on cable TV to give us their bouncy, aggressive, tendentious talking points. They are like the men on the plane, the gargoyles with BlackBerrys who think the race is about them and their personal win/loss ratio, who think history is their plaything, who stay up with the press in the bar sipping Perrier and calling it seltzer, and who advise their candidates, in essence, to talk down to the voters, to the American people. They treat every crisis as if it is a political fact to be used for gain or loss, and not as a real crisis, something that deserves a response of gravity and seriousness.
It is asking a lot to ask a political animal to be thoughtful, because they find meaning in action. They are propelled through life by the force of their hunger. But now and then you want to see them think. You want to see them speak the truth. This is one of those times.”
Though she’s not liked among many here, she does speak a bit of truth. The author’s name: Peggy Noonan.
Send_Me on October 10, 2008 at 6:24 PM
I have never seen anything like today’s trading. In the end, it was way better than I expected.
Terrye on October 10, 2008 at 6:26 PM
Yea, but massive shorting also helps make the stock go down – it would be like being able to continuously bet BLACK on the roulette wheel, which would modify the wheel to cause BLACK to come up more often.
Shorting, with some limits in place, is OK, but permit a free-for-all?
Why did they do away with the “you can only short on an uptick” rule? Why are people still allowed to do naked shorts even though it’s supposed to be a prohibited practice? Somebody (the politicians) wanted to favor the snatch-n-grab gamblers, that’s why, and it stinks.
If shorting is so great, why not just keep shorting a stock until it reaches zero, then move on to the next company and start shorting it?
electric-rascal on October 10, 2008 at 7:17 PM
We’re from the government and we’re here to take over
MB4 on October 10, 2008 at 7:44 PM
Romeo – I never said the market is fine; far from it. I said it’s rational, and is based on logic, not that the market is doing fine, which is obviously not the case. If you think the people that play with Other People’s Money as you call it, aren’t doing their job, by all means: trade your own stocks. Investment professionals possess a wealth of knowledge that the common investor does not possess. It’s analogous to trying to diagnose your own symptoms; you can probably get close, but wouldn’t you want to trust a doctor?
Csdeven – This whole mess has been the government’s fault. Stay with me here: the mortgage-backed securities, many of them backed by Fannie & Freddie, that are killing the market (thanks to ACORN and the democrats). They were graded as safe investments by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, and other ratings agencies that are approved by the government. It’s all based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the value of these securities, thanks to the ratings agencies. The institutions that bought these are unfortunately holding the bag, misunderstanding the damage that could be done to their balance sheets.
Electric-rascal – Naked shorts are not allowed, but it’s very hard to track that with millions (8 billion yesterday) of shares being traded daily. People get caught doing it EVERYDAY. I’m not advocating shorting every company til they go broke, I do it occasionally when I see companies making mistakes.
Whew! I still say the USA will bounce back, as we have the best and most resilient economy on Earth.
FLcapitalistthug on October 10, 2008 at 7:56 PM
This picture pretty much sums up my feelings:
cannonball on October 10, 2008 at 8:16 PM
We’re probably in for another volatile week next week, but probably the worst is over. People have probably woken up to the fact that these companies are not really broke, their profits might be down next year, but they do have intrinsic value, and their P/E ratios are extremely low, and could be good buying opportunities.
Even the mortgage-based securities are not totally worthless–many of the mortgages in them are actually GOOD mortgages (people making their payments), and even a bad mortgage is still secured by a house, which could be sold at foreclosure. It will take time to sort this out, but this looks more like 1987 than 1929. In 1987, the market dropped about 30% in a week, but had rebounded within a year.
Except, of course, if Obambi gets elected, and pushes the New Socialist New Deal through Congress, taxing the h*ll out of everything, nationalizing health care, cutting energy supplies, and leaving no room for growth. Which is why McCain has to clearly state the case that the subprime loan mess is the Democrats’ fault, and that he is the man who can fix it.
Steve Z on October 10, 2008 at 8:19 PM
It isn’t. Now the economy will catch up with the stock market.
Bad idea. You would get rid of people who make markets in stocks. The market makers bid and offer hoping to make the difference between the the bid and offer-known as the spread. They are the ones that provide liquidity and who, therefore, keep volatility down. Decimalization has forced a lot of market makers out of the business and you have seen an increase in volatility.
Bill C on October 10, 2008 at 11:11 PM
Too sick of Obamamania to read HotAir much anymore. But did anyone see this sad/funny summary of the socialist economic voodoo of the leftist Democrat from Hyde Park?
Strassel nails it.
Jaibones on October 10, 2008 at 11:16 PM
They aren’t fundamentally strong. Our Federal Reserve has pumped up our economy with cheap credit and now all the asset prices that reached the sky will have to come down to a place where they have historically corresponded to income.
I have been saying this on this blog for so long but I will say it again. Easy money will ruin the US. Our economy is weak and we need a period of detox and no bailout will make any damn difference other than to maybe ease the pain and, of course, prolong the recovery. (See Japan.)
Bill C on October 10, 2008 at 11:19 PM
No, no and no. The govt has done their thing. The markets need to do their thing. Sorry, no easy fixes. The good part of a recession is all the fat cats get the boot and they go out and build new businesses. That’s why you invest in the Russell 2000 coming out of one of these.
pc on October 10, 2008 at 11:50 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 4 5 6