PALIN GUILTY!! except she was within her rights to dismiss Monegan

Barack Obama was involved with Project Vote in a leadership role. According to Chicago Magazine,
a 31 year old rising star literally changed Chicago’s electoral landscape in 1992:

http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/January-1993/Vote-of-Confidence/

Now – suppose I told you that research has established original documents that place the
mailing address of:

ACORN
PROJECT VOTE
THE NEW PARTY

all at the same location. Do you think that would be enough to get so-called professional journalists
to maybe square the Messiah circle? I am not holding my breath …

ACORN: http://tinyurl.com/4hodkn (scroll down to “ACORN fall close to tree”) = 88 3rd Ave
PROJECT VOTE: http://tinyurl.com/3l7jh2 (WHOIS domain registration) = 88 3rd Ave
THE NEW PARTY (proven front for the Democatic Socialists of America): http://tinyurl.com/4hm4d9
= 88 3rd Ave

Again – how bad does it have to smell? When will the media do their job? After the election – maybe?
————————————————-

Ayers beat the rap, became a teacher and has an alliance running for President.

Scary Halloween huh ! ! Boo ! !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA77kpXm3HE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONfJ7YSXE5w

Instapundit reports! Good stuff and lots of it, link and keep scrolling.

Feel free to go on at length being “more precise” about what O’bama wants for this country and how he intends to go about it.

Feel free…only until Obama’s goons get their tentacles around you.

Fine, so Mr. ZerO doesn’t explicitly say it.
Fine, so he doesn’t want the government to take over everything right away.

HE IS THE PATH (I’ll avoid “Road To Serfdom”) TO SOCIALISM – and NOTHING LESS. I grew up visiting relatives in Eastern Europe every year, and you don’t need to see hammer-and-sickle signs to understand the difference between our freedom and that “system” of tyranny.

Unless there is a specific circumstance (i.e. among a certain audience) in which indeed it would devalue an argument by using that term, I consider labeling Obama – and at a minimum his policies – SOCIALIST appropriate.

(I mean, geez…just last weekend there was a page 1 article in the WSJ which had an avowed Socialist claiming that Obama’s policies “weren’t really socialist”…I mean, c’mon, folks…just because the extremists say “he isn’t extreme like us”…is that supposed to make him “mainstream”?!)

Please read from today’s American Thinker:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/why_obamas_communist_connectio.html

Ah, I see you’re throwing either the change up or split finger. Good idea.

a capella on October 9, 2008 at 9:29 PM

Please pardon my obtuseness (obtusity? obtusion?) but I don’t get your point. Are you saying I’m taking a slightly different direction on the Ayers topic than the straight-down-the-middle “bad judgment” fastball?

FWIW, I’m definitely in Phillies Heaven this morning, which is a region seldom visited…

Ditto. I copied and saved it in my Obambi reference folder.

MrLynn on October 10, 2008 at 7:47 AM

http://www.plumbbobblog.com/?p=215
http://www.plumbbobblog.com/?p=396

However, Spain is run by a socialist party. I don’t think anyone in America would consider Spain “evil.” Do you?

terryannonline on October 9, 2008 at 2:48 PM

This is an argument from impressions, not from facts. Most of us don’t know enough about Spain, good or bad, to actually make an assessment like that. We only have impressions from a lifetime of Rick Steves episodes and Zoro flicks.

Check out the Spain of Pan’s Labyrinth or The Devil’s Backbone, or even of Volver, and you get a different image, but even those are just media images, not facts. It’s not enough to make a reasoned guess; but “reason” is not really your goal here, is it?

Here’s a fact about Spain that most people don’t know, however. Spain has the lowest birth rate in Europe, running at somewhat less than half of replacement level. I don’t know about Spain’s policies, but something has infected the nation that’s causing it to die off. If that’s not evil, it’s at least stupid and self-destructive, and I’m not inclined to imitate it. Are you?

Dale in Atlanta on October 9, 2008 at 2:30 PM

Excellent post… I knew all that individually, but have never seen it laid out so plainly and nicely in one spot. Than you.

LegendHasIt on October 10, 2008 at 3:23 AM

Ditto. I copied and saved it in my Obambi reference folder.

I guess that belief is reserved for the Bush/Paulson Pelosi/Reid crowd.

What a stupid comment.

Ballot Access Expert Richard Winger has confirmed to Libertarian Republican blog that the New Party, which was an arm of the Democrat Socialists of American, changed its name in 2000 to the New Families Party. They still have affiliates in many states under that banner, and do run ad endorse candidates.

Oddly, some of the affiliates endorsed Obama this year, and at least one, the New York Chapter, had their endorsement accepted by Obama.

This means that Obama accepted the endorsement of the heir of the original New Party of which he was a member of, in at least one State Chapter. This is a very recent connection between Obama and the Democrat Socialists of America.

What buffonery. Ed, wake up. If you don’t think Obama is a socialist, your clearly not paying attention.

While I have read some interesting stuff from Ol’ Rick before, I’m pretty sure that his name is misspelled and that a is supposed to be another o.

Dale in Atlanta on October 9, 2008 at 2:30 PM

Excellent post… I knew all that individually, but have never seen it laid out so plainly and nicely in one spot. Than you.

According to US commentator and former leftist, David Horowitz’s website, Discover the Network, DSA seeks to increase its political influence not by establishing its own party, but rather by working closely with the Democratic Party to promote leftist agendas. . .

from this website,

The Socialists Behind the “Progressive Caucus

link posted on the Power LIne Forum, here:

Barack Obama, Socialist? (post no. 69).

(Post-hypnotic mantra of the fatally incurious.)

When I asked him if he had heard anything about 1) Ayers, 2) Annenberg, or 3) ACORN. He hadn’t. Not a thing. And he found the information very disturbing.

.
Umm – that’s why I assemble and bcc: link filled emails to all the Democrats I know (plus the Providence NBC ombudsman, who asked me why I thought the media was biased). Nobody yet has asked me to stop. Get busy – there are plenty of cut n’ paste opportunities to inform non-lefty Dems.

philwynk on October 9, 2008 at 7:39 PM

Ah, I see you’re throwing either the change up or split finger. Good idea.

Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis

please do so. It may change your thinking. It demonstrates an ideological linkage among radical socialist Columbia University professors, Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox, Barack Obama, ACORN, Saul Alinski, and others, all working toward a common goal: the creation of economic and social crises that will undermine and ultimately destroy America.

If Obambi is a willing and eager participant in this movement, or simply an ambitious tool? Either way, he is dangerous, now that he is so close to the center of American power, and every bit of evidence we can put before the American people before the election might help stop him.

He won’t call himself a ‘socialist’, but we can. Personally, I suspect he’s a Communist.