McCain goes full frontal on Obama-Ayers connection
posted at 7:09 am on October 9, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | regular view
Team McCain has a new ad out this morning called “Ayers”, a comprehensive attack on Obama on his relationship with former Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers. This isn’t just a suggestive 30-second spot. It’s one minute and forty seconds that detail the kind of work the two did together, Ayers’ early political partnership, and Obama’s obfuscation of the nature of their political partnership in Chicago:
Barack Obama and domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. Friends. They’ve worked together for years. But Obama tries to hide it. Why?
Obama launched his political career in Ayers’ living room. Ayers and Obama ran a radical “education” foundation, together. They wrote the foundation’s by-laws, together. Obama was the foundation’s first chairman. Reports say they, “distributed more than $100 million to ideological allies with no discernible improvement in education.”
When their relationship became an issue, Obama just responded, “This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood.” That’s it?
We know Bill Ayers ran the “violent left wing activist group” called Weather Underground. We know Ayers’ wife was on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted list. We know they bombed the Capitol. The Pentagon. A judge’s home. We know Ayers said, “I don’t regret setting bombs. …. I feel we didn’t do enough.”
But Obama’s friendship with terrorist Ayers isn’t the issue. The issue is Barack Obama’s judgment and candor. When Obama just says, “This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood,” Americans say, “Where’s the truth, Barack?”
Barack Obama. Too risky for America.
The length of the spot would normally indicate that this is intended for web viewing only. However, John McCain gives the standard broadcast endorsement at the end, which strongly suggests that they will do ad buys in 90-second chunks in some battleground states for this. Recent reports had Obama outspending McCain 3-1 since the conventions, but perhaps Team McCain wanted to conserve its cash for this attack.
I suspect this is not the end of this subject, either. I’d expect at least one more ad featuring John Murtaugh, the son of the judge whose home got bombed by the Weather Underground. Murtaugh, who is running for the New York state legislature, has already released a statement through the McCain campaign attacking Obama for associating with an unrepentant leader of the terrorist organization that tried to kill him as a boy. I’m certain he will happily participate in an ad to put a human face on Ayers’ terrorism.
This ad demonstrates that McCain has no intention of nibbling around the edges on Ayers. He will go after Obama with everything he has on this subject. This also puts pressure on McCain to “say it to his face” in the next debate, as Obama will certainly challenge him to do after this ad airs. Bob Schieffer, the next debate moderator, may already be writing the question for it now.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Did anyone see Bill Burton have a near meltdown while Gretchen was grilling him this AM? He wouldn’t let her speak and was almost screaming his BS lies and spin about Oslime-a’s continued obfuscation of the truth concerning Ayres.
Typical Rosie O’fatpiggo tactic of screaming it as loud as possible in the desperate belief that it will magically become truth.
I tell you, it was a joy to watch! lol
csdeven on October 9, 2008 at 8:33 AM
No. The Clintons are pretty much doing all they can to help McCain and hurt Obama without endangering their party standing. Notice the lack of enthusiasm both have for actively campaigning for Obama. Yes, they’ve made some perfunctory speeches, but you can tell their heart isn’t in it. Also, who knows what’s going on behind closed doors…
Matt Helm on October 9, 2008 at 8:33 AM
Yep, I do. Does she want to be tarred with the coming radical Washington administration, the financial mess, the gun grabbing, the implosion of SS? Or does she want to be the paladin and ride in and restore the party of Harry Truman? I’m betting on the later.
Limerick on October 9, 2008 at 8:33 AM
McCain absolutely has to underline the idea that he and Palin are the only thing between safety and insanity. Show the facts of an entire Democratic gov’t! It’s the equivelent of handing Pelosi and Reid a blank check, not to mention the socialistic “fairness doctrine” the politicism of our public schools, there will be NO transparency, and you’ll just have to take it. It’ll be almost impossible to get rid of them. America! wake up!
anniekc on October 9, 2008 at 8:33 AM
What are you referring to?
Blake on October 9, 2008 at 8:34 AM
Fox just played the McGovern ad about private elections in labor unions. Nice ad.
A vote for Obama is a vote against democracy–McGovern ad, Acorn stealing elections, Missouri truth squads, Stanley Kurtz persecuted for reviewing Obama’s CAC record, etc.
Hey, earlier on Fox, Burton of Obama’s campaign argued that this story had been looked at by the media and all questions had been answered. What? Kurtz started writing articles based on his review of Obama’s work with Ayers only two weeks ago. The media is like a group of 5-year olds with hands over their ears screaming.
Obama can call this a desperate distraction, but McCain needs to get on this and get his act together on his own domestic agenda.
Pull the trigger, McCain.
BuckeyeSam on October 9, 2008 at 8:34 AM
This could be HUGE in the debate. They need to drill McCain on ALL potential comebacks from Obama. If he says, “Why did you said, “he’s a guy who lives in my neighborhood”, why did you need to cover it up?” GOTCHA moments can be defining moments.
marklmail on October 9, 2008 at 8:36 AM
What anniekc said.
Fox reported that Brady Quinn, QB of the Cleveland Browns, introduced McCain in Cleveland. His dad is a Vietnam vet gold.
I said this weeks ago. McCain-Palin need to do some coin tosses at some Big Ten home games: Ohio State, Penn State, Pennsylvania. Obama can’t do this kind of thing because he’s not comfortable with this stuff.
BuckeyeSam on October 9, 2008 at 8:38 AM
There may be breaking news on another front, although related. There’s a new revelation about the Obama-Socialist New Party connection, which may be confirmed this morning. Seems, the Socialist New Party didn’t really go defunct in 2000, and has current affiliates, one of whom may have…
Well, I’ll let that go until we get 100% confirmation.
I suspect later this morning.
Eric Dondero, Publisher
Libertarian Republican blog
ericdondero on October 9, 2008 at 8:38 AM
Fox is replaying the McCain ad segment.
I really wish that they had tied in their waste of all that money on radical educational theories. That will get through to parents.
BuckeyeSam on October 9, 2008 at 8:40 AM
I’n not so sure this is “way late” drjohn. If the McCain camp had gone this route even a month ago, it might not have the legs to last at the greatest moment to impact the voters fickle minds. This issue was most likely calculated for a time slot when McCain would need to stem a tide like now. Even with the “change” mantra, I still don’t understand how the electorate thinks Obama’s economic plans will bring “us” back to prosperity.
McCain needs to frame Obama’s complete economic plan as THE ULTIMATE BAILOUT. The electorate hates the word bailout more than the hate George Bush.
Couldn’t believe my ears this morning: Joe Scarbough: “Is it George Bush’s fault when Americans go out and buy a $4500 dollar flat screen tv when they can’t afford it?……Is it George Bush’s fault when Americans go out and buy a home when they can’t afford it?”
Joe was basically scolding “the folks” for their judgement and spending practices.
Rovin on October 9, 2008 at 8:40 AM
I really don’t want to picture McCain going full frontal on anything.
e-pirate on October 9, 2008 at 8:41 AM
That’s absolutely wrong, of course. But I’m still thrilled to see them fire both barrels on this. Even if it doesn’t change the election dynamic, I’m betting that it will give conservative Republicans some ammunition for future purposes, when things go sideways, and certainly for the 2012 election, after we’ve seen the kinds of judges that this leftist pos appoints.
And speaking of which, how about a huge media blitz following the Ayers commercial, which connects the dots, and finally asks -
“what kind of Supreme Court Judges do you suppose a guy like this will appoint? If infanticide in the Illinois General Assembly is within Barack Obama’s philosophical reach, and people who bombed the Capitol and the Pentagon are his fiends and professional associates, then who will his judges be?”
Jaibones on October 9, 2008 at 8:41 AM
Uh…you mean like that?
Jaibones on October 9, 2008 at 8:43 AM
This Ayers stuff is important. However, if it was in fact THAT important, McCain would have been on this story 6 months ago, when it could have done some good. McCain has always tried to run as a respectable loser so he can slink back to his Senate seat and still have lunch with Democrats next session. Hey Mac, we cared about this issue (along with the Rev. Wright connection) months ago and you were silent. Too late now.
John McCain is like a painful kidney stone the Republican party must pass before we can move on as a united “conservative” voice of the people.
Angry Dumbo on October 9, 2008 at 8:44 AM
I don’t like that risky line. Let viewers draw it themselves, but don’t force it on them. It’s almost playing into Obama’s claims. I’d prefer to see them stick with the whole “Judgement to lead? No.” thing.
BadgerHawk on October 9, 2008 at 8:47 AM
Do you remember the speech to protest Ahmadinejad at the UN when the group invited both Hillary and Sarah Palin? When Hillary discovered that Palin was invited, she withdrew. Afterward, the group un-invited Sarah to speak.
csdeven on October 9, 2008 at 8:50 AM
#$*& yeah! ’bout #&$ing time!
This is huge. You’re worried about the economy? Remember what 9/11 did to the economy? And you think a guy who pals around with a Communist nailbomber is going to be good for the economy?
Look at Chicago schools. You want this guy pushing “Afrocentrism” over education nationwide?
You want continual “revisions” of SNL skits to meet, um, “standards?”
The Weathermanchurian Candidate™
saint kansas on October 9, 2008 at 8:50 AM
Amen.
Let’s all donate a few bucks to the RNC to help out the cause.
This ad needs to be repeated in all battleground states.
carbon_footprint on October 9, 2008 at 8:51 AM
And then he finishes up by saying that when Obama found out about Ayers past he condemned his actions. He seems to do that a lot. I would run an ad showing Obama throwing all of his past associates under the bus one after the other to get the point across.
yakwill83 on October 9, 2008 at 8:52 AM
Ayers is definitely fair game, but so is McCain’s funding of actual terrorists in Central America who raped, killed, tortured, and robbed thousands of innocent people. Right guys?
Typhonsentra on October 9, 2008 at 8:53 AM
Really? What were the issues 6 months ago? No one remembers them. This is very clever because when people go into the privacy of their voting booth, they have the vision of Oslime-a consorting with terrorists and doling out millions to groups whose sole purpose is to radicalize youth rather than teach them skills that will benefit them in the workplace.
csdeven on October 9, 2008 at 8:54 AM
For all of you saying this is too late: no way. With the attention span of this country this is perfect timing. Allow it to stew into the nation’s consciousness for the next 3 1/2 weeks. Little time for Obama to refute. Perfect timing.
carbon_footprint on October 9, 2008 at 8:55 AM
This line of attack simply isn’t working, though the McCain campaign thinks the reason for that is that they aren’t doing enough of it.
News flash: people care about their wallets, not bill ayers.
Seven Seas on October 9, 2008 at 8:56 AM
Every Obama defender should be asked if they would ever attended a political event, or sit on a board with a known terrorist. McCain also needs to get specific with the radical groups that Obama gave education money to, and exactly what they did with that money.
mtbunji on October 9, 2008 at 8:57 AM
Its not too late and what I’d like to see McCain do in this last debate is take it over like Palin did in hers. Talk directly to the people via the camera, announce halfway through, if the questions are as inane as the other night, that he’s done having the media shape the questions and here is what we all need to know to make an informed decision at the polls in November. Then attack Obama on Ayers, the dems on the housing crisis, his ridiculous 95% plan, go after him on Acorn the truth squads and other attempts by his campaign to shut down free speech – and by contrast use that opportunity to blast his supporters for spreading lies about Palin banning books as a cover for Obama’s real attempts at censorship. McCain has to put Obama on the defensive from here on out in order to win this race. Forget the moderates and undecideds, he has to go for the jugular, show leadership and pronounce conservative principles (especially in this economic mess) and the race is his.
smfoushee on October 9, 2008 at 8:58 AM
Many have wanted to mention the “M”-word in reference to Obama.
But they have the wrong “M”-word.
It is not Muslim, it is Marxist.
The thread that ties Obama to Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright and the others in his past political circle of associates is they all believe in a Marxist-type politic.
albill on October 9, 2008 at 9:01 AM
You are an idiot.
wise_man on October 9, 2008 at 9:03 AM
Everyone should read Quin Hillyer in The American Spectator today. McCain needs to buy 15-30 minutes on Fox, promote the hell out of it, and blast this out on the last weekend of the campaign.
kflynn on October 9, 2008 at 9:05 AM
They have to make clear that Obama LIED about his funding of ACORN.
And for God’s sake, the next time Obama says that McCain has been for deregulation would someone PLEASE tell McCain to make Obama specify WHAT deregulation????
PLEASE????
drjohn on October 9, 2008 at 9:06 AM
The next ad writes itself:
[Picture of Ted Kasczynski (sp)]
Ted Kasczynski – Domestic terrorist, [insert clarifying blurb here; multiple bombings, etc.]
Eric Rudolph – Domestic terrorist, [insert clarifying blurb here; multiple bombings, etc.]
Timothy McVeigh – Domestic terrorist, [insert clarifying blurb here; worst terrorist attack in U.S. history]
Williams Ayers – Domestic terrorist, among other atrocities, attempted to bomb a U.S. Army base, the Pentagon and the U.S. Capital
One presidential candidate was completely comfortable forming a close professional relationship with and starting his political career with the aid of one of these domestic terrorists that were dedicated to hurting the country that we love. [Picture of Barack Obama]. One presidential candidate went to the front lines to defend the country that we love. [Picture of John McCain in uniform]
On November 4, you will be asked to select a presidential candidate whose judgement you trust to defend our country in times of crisis. What will your choice be? [Note: do NOT answer the question for the viewer.]
I’m John McCain and I approve…..
Tongueboy on October 9, 2008 at 9:07 AM
Did anyone see Bill Burton have a near meltdown while Gretchen was grilling him this AM?
Sure did! Gretchen’s little and cute but she sure stands her ground. I’d kill myself if Fox News didn’t exist!
Anyway that is what little people do when they can’t win an argument do THEY SCREAM AND SHOUT THE PERSON DOWN.
They won’t shut us all up though. The truth will get out.
lisalj on October 9, 2008 at 9:09 AM
You are always so optimistic, aren’t you, Ed?
Tzetzes on October 9, 2008 at 9:09 AM
I think that at next week’s debate, McCain should make a point about saying something about Ayers and then telling Obama: “Senator Obama, I just said that in your face.”
carbon_footprint on October 9, 2008 at 9:10 AM
IT’S THE ECONOMY, STUPID.
IT’S THE ECONOMY, STUPID.
IT’S THE ECONOMY, STUPID.
IT’S THE ECONOMY, STUPID.
IT’S THE ECONOMY, STUPID.
RICK DAVIS!
WOULD YOU PLEASE RUN COMMERCIALS AND PIN THE TAIL ON THE DONKEY???????
WOULD YOU PLEASE SHOW AMERICA WHO IS TO BLAME FOR THIS ECONOMIC MESS??????
WOULD YOU PLEASE SHOW DEMOCRATS SHIELDING FANNIE AND FREDDIE AND BLOCKING REFORM?????
PLEASE??????
drjohn on October 9, 2008 at 9:10 AM
I’m sure he is. “Senator McCain, is it fair to attack Senator Obama for something a stranger was doing when Senator Obama was eight years-old?”
Akzed on October 9, 2008 at 9:11 AM
OBAMA IS NOT THE SOLUTION.
HE WAS PART OF THE PROBLEM.
drjohn on October 9, 2008 at 9:11 AM
“Well, Bob, Senator Obama was 40 years old when Mr. Ayers took this picture here in my hand. As you can see, Mr. Ayers is trampling the flag of the United States, and he is Senator Obama’s friend.”
drjohn on October 9, 2008 at 9:13 AM
3 1/2 weeks is a loooooong time for the MSM to try and kill all of these stories. If Americans (the non-Kool Aid Obamaphiles) really take a look at BHO, they are turned off. McCain needs to get these issues said at a debate, where the MSM HAVE to talk about it and needs Drudge to run wild with headlines. The MSM read Drudge more than any other site and have a hard time ignoring his “red siren” stories.
Sugar Land on October 9, 2008 at 9:17 AM
Who is going to see this…nobody. You gotta have a 30 or a 60.
Frankly I think a bookend around another spot would be kick ass.
tomas on October 9, 2008 at 9:18 AM
I’m with Hillary… I’m voting for McCain!
Abby Adams on October 9, 2008 at 9:20 AM
Me too. He was very defensive – as if he knew there was something to hide. That kind of reaction won’t help Obama’s cause when casual observers see it.
The best way to handle attacks is to calmly deny and calmly refute the claims. The problem the Obama surrogates have is that there’s no way to refute the claims, so they have to try to shout over people and make counter accusations as a distraction technique.
forest on October 9, 2008 at 9:21 AM
Are you kidding?
Have you seen Obama surrogates on TV this week?
Did you see Gibbs accuse Hannity of being an anti-semite or Bill Burton’s meltdown today?
Even Chris Matthews says this will raise doubts with swing voters.
CanadianGuy on October 9, 2008 at 9:22 AM
William Ayers is the .22 for some reason known only to him McCain took the thermo nuclear device off the table, Jeremiah Wright. Why he did that I cannot understand or agree. That was beyond weird.
Jeremiah Wright is the key to this. Not only is Wright a racist pig, but he also took federal money to spread his “black theology”.
When the country’s economy is in the tank “black theology” is alive and well.
Jdripper on October 9, 2008 at 9:23 AM
Senator McCain, Why do you run negative attack ads on a professor of education in Illinois? Do you feel this will close the gap or have you abandoned your role as a maverick that works in a bipartisan manner?
Herb on October 9, 2008 at 9:24 AM
To me, though, this goes hand-in-hand with the B.S. that is “Change.” How is throwing up our hands and handing everything over to the decaying hangers-on of the ’60s anti-American radical left “change?”
They couldn’t get elected into power then, so they blew 5hit up instead. But now they have a proxy candidate on the ballot who’s green enough to do just what they say.
I suppose this is the fruit of implementing leftist social and educational policies 40 years ago. Enough people are just out there wondering, “Where’s my check? Too many people have more than I do, and that’s not fair.”
saint kansas on October 9, 2008 at 9:28 AM
If anything it will force Obama to answer comprehensively.
Dash on October 9, 2008 at 9:28 AM
At least they’re getting more specific. All of their ads need more specificity.
CP on October 9, 2008 at 9:35 AM
Regarding Ayers, they need to highlight the fact that Obama/Ayers on the Annenberg board were directing the funds at groups trying to radicalize students against their parents, and denying funding to groups promoting real improvement in education, such as math and science.
They also need to go after Obama’s “training” of ACORN thugs to intimidate bankers into giving risky loans (tying Obama to the economic crisis), his representation of ACORN as a lawyer, and the fact that ACORN is now accused of voter fraud in many states.
Also point up that Obama’s self-proclaimed experience as a “community organizer” is the “CO” in ACORN.
Web ads are nice as far as they go, but do swing voters look at political ads on the Internet, or do they only watch TV?
Steve Z on October 9, 2008 at 9:37 AM
You rang? Well I’ve learned two good lessons in the past few months.
Don’t pay attn to pres. politics until October.
Don’t sweat the mortgage.
JiangxiDad on October 9, 2008 at 9:39 AM
Agreed. Just not sure what good it will do. The media will spin his answer into “what incredible political skills he has to have maneuvered around that issue.” They said similar things about Bill Clinton when Conservatives had him dead to rights on an issue. The media just resigns to the info being out there and even if they can’t deny it for him, they simply praise his political skills. Not their first choice mind you, but anything will do in a pinch when they’re in the home stretch to getting their guy elected.
Overall, the news in the last couple of days has been having the effect of beating me up in a way. It seems there is nothing the media thinks worthy of reporting about this man. As a matter of fact, a story about William Ayers turns into a story about Sarah Palin being a racist. Huh? ACORN is getting caught all over the country getting a single person to register 10-15 times? Multiply that times a couple thousand people. There are some days when I feel like we are bucking the entire world.
hawkdriver on October 9, 2008 at 9:42 AM
“Will America hold to the principles of capitalism and free enterprise or will it embrace elements of socialism, Marxism and communism? Those are our choices.
In his 1982 book, “The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism,” Michael Novak noted that many who have lived under socialism would find it hard to believe “that other human beings would fall for the same bundle of lies, half-truths and distortions. Sadly, however, illusion is often sweeter to human taste than reality. The last Marxist in the world will probably be an American nun.”
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism,” said Norman Thomas, a U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate in the 1940s. “But under the name of ‘liberalism,’ they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day, America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.”
If it is to be, let’s do it with our eyes open, aware of every ponderous step.
I understand why a person wouldn’t look a gift horse in the mouth when promised “entitlements” or income redistribution or care whether it is called liberalism, progressivism, socialism, Marxism, communism or “change.” We at least should know whether it is a gift horse or a Trojan horse, or a combination of the two.“
Star20 on October 9, 2008 at 9:43 AM
I strongly suspect Rev. Wright will be the subject next week or the week after. I believe (based on no inside information whatsoever) that this is part of a carefully planned 4-week attack to release damaging information about Obama in waves. While Obama is still busy lying and spinning about the first attack, the next one comes and blindsides him. Later, rinse, repeat.
doppelganglander on October 9, 2008 at 9:44 AM
Sorry, that should be lather, rinse, repeat.
doppelganglander on October 9, 2008 at 9:46 AM
I see some 527 ads running in Florida on the Dodd democrats corruption on the FM-FM scandal.
Right_of_Attila on October 9, 2008 at 9:46 AM
Personally, I’m more than disappointed. I don’t think this is enough to punch through the MSM fog protecting 0bama.
p0s3r on October 9, 2008 at 9:46 AM
(From Hugh Hewitt)The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza is a regular and very welcome guest on the program. Prompted by Ace of Spades, I asked Chris on Tuesday prior to the presidential debate about MSM’s treatment of Joe Biden’s serial misstatements at last week’s VP debate. The transcript is here.
At the conclusion of the interview I inquired if Chris knew of Rashid Khalidi, and Khalidi’s friendship with Bill Ayers and Khalidi’s long association with Barack Obama. Chris didn’t, which didn’t surprise me as I hadn’t know about it either until an interview with Stanley Kurtz on Monday.
Khalidi is a Columbia professor and strong advocate for the Palestinians. He is a man of the left, and he is close to Obama and Ayers. Obama’s friendship with Khalidi would be unsettling to many supporters of Israel –if it was well known, which it isn’t. How close have Obama and Khalidi been? Here’s the opening of a Los Angeles Times article from 2007:
It was a celebration of Palestinian culture — a night of music, dancing and a dash of politics. Local Arab Americans were bidding farewell to Rashid Khalidi, an internationally known scholar, critic of Israel and advocate for Palestinian rights, who was leaving town for a job in New York.
A special tribute came from Khalidi’s friend and frequent dinner companion, the young state Sen. Barack Obama. Speaking to the crowd, Obama reminisced about meals prepared by Khalidi’s wife, Mona, and conversations that had challenged his thinking.
His many talks with the Khalidis, Obama said, had been “consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases. . . . It’s for that reason that I’m hoping that, for many years to come, we continue that conversation — a conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashid’s dinner table,” but around “this entire world.”
Today, five years later, Obama is a U.S. senator from Illinois who expresses a firmly pro-Israel view of Middle East politics, pleasing many of the Jewish leaders and advocates for Israel whom he is courting in his presidential campaign. The dinner conversations he had envisioned with his Palestinian American friend have ended. He and Khalidi have seen each other only fleetingly in recent years.
And yet the warm embrace Obama gave to Khalidi, and words like those at the professor’s going-away party, have left some Palestinian American leaders believing that Obama is more receptive to their viewpoint than he is willing to say.
Their belief is not drawn from Obama’s speeches or campaign literature, but from comments that some say Obama made in private and from his association with the Palestinian American community in his hometown of Chicago, including his presence at events where anger at Israeli and U.S. Middle East policy was freely expressed.
What Kurtz explained to me is that Bill Ayers and Rashid Khalidi are very close:
HH: Tell us about Khalidi. Tell us who he is and his role in Obama’s life.
SK: Rashid Khalidi is really, in a sense, the American successor of Edward Said, a very strong advocate for the Palestinians, extremely radical in his views and his opposition to American foreign policy. He was a friend and colleague of Obama. Apparently they used to get together and discuss world affairs. And he’s practically the best friend of Bill Ayers. Bill Ayers features Khalidi in some of his books about how to politicize the teaching for students. So actually, the more you look into it, the more you see that this is not just people running into each other. And again, I object to the idea of just simply counting the times people were together in a room. When you fund Bill Ayers education projects, with hundreds of thousands of dollars, when you as Bill Ayers publish Rashid Khalidi’s essay in your book of collected essays, they might have gone on. That’s a lot without meeting once.
What all of this suggests is that the Hyde Park community of hard left intellectuals was tightly knit, and that Obama was at the heart of it. MSM’s indifference to this community and its impact on Obama is nothing short of astounding, like leaving Harvard and Hyannis Port out of story after story on Kennedy’s run for the presidency in 1960, or his Vietnam experiences out of Kerry’s bio in 2004.
Keemo on October 9, 2008 at 9:47 AM
Democrats triggered the economic meltdown 60-days before an election and Democrats are benefitting from said meltdown in the polls immensely.
Obama would NOT…I repeat…WOULD NOT be leading at all, much less by a wide margin had it not been for the crisis.
This Ayers connection, his promise to raise taxes, reverend Wright, most liberal senator in the history of mankind, etc. would have sunk him long ago if the economy hadn’t tanked. The ONLY reason people want Obama is because President Bush is a republican presiding over what the media keep insisting is the next great depression (I thought liberals detested using fear in politics).
Goodeye_Closed on October 9, 2008 at 9:49 AM
The question is, when did Obama find out about Ayers past?
True_King on October 9, 2008 at 9:49 AM
The one problem with the gradual release of the Ayers info, (considering the idea of connecting further to racial school curriculums) the Obama people do a gradual morph on the story in general as new stuff comes out. And then America gets burn out because to them none of it is earth shattering in small bits. It would have been better to have a big, every detail we know all at one time moment at the debate or in a commercial. Then they would have had to address the entire mess all at one time.
hawkdriver on October 9, 2008 at 9:50 AM
hopefully there will be a series of new Ads, communicating what Stanley Kurtz reported
jp on October 9, 2008 at 9:50 AM
I’ve wasted whole bottles of shampoo in a single shower because of those instructions.
hawkdriver on October 9, 2008 at 9:51 AM
drjohn on October 9, 2008 at 9:10 AM
The ad is out tying Dodd, Frank to the mess and Dems refuseing oversight of Fannie and Freddie, The ad is out. I saw it in Iowa. The timing is great the undecideds are just starting to pay attention and there is one debate to go not much time for “That One” to lie his way out of this. Hit him from all sides before the last debate piss “That One” off then go for the kill.
Go John, Go Sarah some of us have your backs!
dhunter on October 9, 2008 at 9:52 AM
When I saw Palin v. Biden, and McCain v. Obama debates, I was struck by how much each side wanted to claim Joe Six-Pack and his family.
As others have often pointed out, the Reps can’t out-promise the Dems. They’re the masters at that.
Instead, the Republican candidates and writers ought to slowly, methodically, and patiently explain the virtues of capitalism and traditional liberal democracy, and the dangers and pitfalls and failures of socialism. This would be for an audience that hasn’t previously ever received such an education.
The life of every class of people in the US is markedly better than their counterparts elsewhere due to our democratic/capitalistic system. The proof is widely available in statistics, pictures, home ownership rates, per capita income, etc. etc.
This is a Newt Gingrich type of project–THE CASE FOR AMERICAN STYLE CAPITALISM.
Remember the movie Why we Fight? The aim would be the same. To re-instill some fundamental beliefs that have been battered and torn, or in many cases, lost.
JiangxiDad on October 9, 2008 at 9:53 AM
Rush brought up some good points concerning this topic as well: even in recent speeches Ayers and Dorn have not given up their radical ideology. AND Ayers went to Venezuela to meet with Chavez about overhauling their school system to indoctrinate the kids over to socialism. That one would tie in very nicely with the Annenburg Project.
Queen0fCups on October 9, 2008 at 9:54 AM
I couldn’t find McCain’s name anywhere in that article.
DarkCurrent on October 9, 2008 at 9:56 AM
It’s silly season in politics again. While Americans are wondering how they’re going to pay their mortgages John McCain is using divisive and untruthful Rovian tactics. Americans deserve better. They want to know how who’s going to bring the change they need, and John McCain and George Bush know they have no answers. It is time George Bush and John McCain answer to the American people about their 8 years of failed policies.
/sarc
El_Terrible on October 9, 2008 at 9:56 AM
I know I’m being a pedant, but can we stop spelling Murtaugh like Danny Glover’s character from Lethal Weapon? It’s Murtagh.
LibTired on October 9, 2008 at 9:58 AM
not going to go over with the soccer moms
the economy is complicated to people. forming lifelong friendships and working partnerships with violent communists? real simple.
that’s why the Obama campaign is going apes*it over this stuff
funky chicken on October 9, 2008 at 9:58 AM
LAME.
I just don’t see this going anywhere.
John_Locke on October 9, 2008 at 10:00 AM
I see the /sarc tag, but the sad thing is that if you remove it, this statement rings true.
If John McCain and Sarah Palin are TRULY the better candidates, then they should be talking about REAL issues. If your home has been foreclosed upon, how is talking about Bill Ayers going to help you? It’s not.
Americans DO deserve better.
thePajamaPundit on October 9, 2008 at 10:01 AM
I thought I read some time ago that Obama had a pretty radical guy sponsor him into Harvard? Was that Rashid?
Queen0fCups on October 9, 2008 at 10:01 AM
The McCain campaign has got to stop whining that Obambi’s radical-left, Marxist connections are just examples of ‘bad judgment’ in choosing the people he associates with. That is just trivial.
The issue is not “guilt by association”; as someone said (sorry I can’t remember who), it is guilt OF association.
The campaign has got to come out and speak the truth: Obambi is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He is a far-left, radical extremist, a member of the New Party (a branch of the Democratic Socialists of America), who has chosen to hobnob, fraternize, work with, and sit at the feet of Communists, Socialists, Marxists, Black Liberationists, Black Muslims, and every other anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-democratic fringe he could find.
Obambi is the tip of a Communist spear pointed directly at the heart of the American Republic.
MrLynn on October 9, 2008 at 10:02 AM
We need to connect the dots. Ayers shows not that Barack was a terrorist, but that he coddled and snuggled to former terrorists and radicals in order to climb the ladders of success in Chicago Democratic Politics. Similarly, McCain needs to connect the dots on Obama’s tax policy:
Mr. Obama intends to raise the top personal income tax rate from 35 percent to 39.6 percent, raise the 15 percent tax rate on capital gains and dividends to between 20 percent and 28 percent, levy higher tax rates on corporations, and increase the Social Security payroll tax on upper-income Americans.
Mr. Obama will be raising taxes on the very parts of our economy that have been the wellspring of its venture capital investment pool that is now on life support.
Exactly how Americans worried about the economy can truly believe we can tax our way out of a recession is a mystery, but that is what Mr. Obama is peddling and that is what Mr. Obama voters are buying hook, line and sinker.
But not everyone. Listen to what University of Maryland economist Peter Morici, a sharp critic of the Bush administration’s economic policies, says about Mr. Obama’s plan: “Obama’s tax and redistribute policies will not resurrect jobs, wages or the price of stocks in American retirement accounts. … Obama’s policies may make economic conditions worse,” he said this week. “His platform is full of platitudes and generalizations but not enough substance.”
What McCain Needs To Do
Mr. Joe on October 9, 2008 at 10:03 AM
These people are PROUD of their past. Obama has been very close to them for at least 13 years. So, yet again, the American people are being asked to believe that Obama has worked and socialized with somebody for decades but he never realized what they were all about?
It brings back Jeremiah Wright without ever having to say his name.
And you want to see ads featuring Jeremiah Wright? Put your money where your mouth is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW2iZ1pD2G4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6E0ycYEGtqU
https://www.completecampaigns.com/FR/contribute.asp?campaignid=OCDBPac
funky chicken on October 9, 2008 at 10:03 AM
IT’S THE LYING, STUPID.
I know we are all verklempt about who Bill Ayers really is, but the BIG issue here is that we have Barack Obama on video lying through his teeth about his relationship with the guy. Why? Why did he lie about it? Why did he cancel the last two debates that were scheduled with Hillary Clinton after Ayers came up in that Philadelphia debate? WHAT IS HE HIDING?
We know almost nothing about this man. Highlighting things like Ayers and ACORN, where he is flat out lying, is important.
If he lies about his past, why should we trust him with our future? Why should we believe anything he says, about cutting taxes, about saving our economy, or keeping America safe and strong?
rockmom on October 9, 2008 at 10:06 AM
You forgot to call us all “racists.”
S on October 9, 2008 at 10:07 AM
I agree 100% – unfortunately, we have McCain, and it’s like any other war – you go with the army you have.
Rush does a lot of it as do some of the other conservative radio guys. I think Newt has done some of it – I wish we saw more of Romney doing it. I wish the campaign were more organized in this direction, but they are not.
And as for Ayers not being relevant, I think he is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Chicago politics – he is merely one of the gatekeepers… if the rest of America could see what goes on in IL politics, knowing that Obama is smack dab in the middle of it (not with his actions, because he really doesn’t have many of those – in the IL senate, Emil Jones, his sponsor, wrote most of his stuff, so Obama could stay clean)they’d be running for the hills!
Queen0fCups on October 9, 2008 at 10:08 AM
This is great but way late. What they need to do is connect Obama, Ayers and ACORN and show the grand plan.
drjohn on October 9, 2008 at 7:19 AM
Oink on October 9, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Americans deserve to have other Americans only buy things that they can pay do so the rest of us don’t have to.
America deserves to know that Republicans tried to regulate FM/FM and were blocked by Frank, Dodd, Waters and Pelosi, all with the big D after their name.
Americans deserve to know who is guiding the ideology of man who may be our next presidents.
Americans deserve to know that one party is almost lock step with the tenents of Marxist movement tactics in out country.
Americans deserve better.
hawkdriver on October 9, 2008 at 10:09 AM
It’s a good thing no one is worried about the economy.
And that the democrats have a lot of complicity there.
Or we might a real issue to talk about.
Oh wait….
lorien1973 on October 9, 2008 at 10:11 AM
Did you know…
Ayers and Dohrn’s two sons are named Zayd and Malik? It’s here -
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE6D7123BF93BA25752C1A965958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
Also: Did Ayers move into the upscale neighborhood in Chicago during or after the Chicago Annenburg Challenge? After Obama funneled money into his radical indoctrination school ‘reform’?
Very lucrative. Viva la revolucion!
rishika on October 9, 2008 at 10:11 AM
Yep. Americans DO care about who their potential next President might have as acquaintances because those people could end up as advisers or cabinet members.
Quit pretending that the economy and ONLY the economy is what is interesting Americans right now; we are smart enough and willing enough to be able to analyze the candidates beyond economic concerns.
Bishop on October 9, 2008 at 10:11 AM
CNN has coverage of a new Obama ad on their front page but no mention of McCain’s. How surprising.
johnt on October 9, 2008 at 10:15 AM
…OK…Ayers is in play…segway to Wright…and Pflegger…and then segway to Raines…and Johnson…and then shift to ACORN…hammer, hammer, hammer…hang his treasonous party around his neck…hammer, hammer, hammer…take the shine off’n that apple, folks….
…after all, who better to link him with than Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and a Congress with a 9% approval rating…responsible for a $700Bil chunk of Uncle Sugar’s wallet…?
Puritan1648 on October 9, 2008 at 10:15 AM
Yes, it was Rashid.
S on October 9, 2008 at 10:16 AM
I mocked this doofus in an earlier thread, but once I realized he was repeating the words of Joe Biden, and by extension the Obama campaign…
this is serious stuff, and a breathtaking attempt to completely and totally destroy free speech in the political arena.
Am I the only one who hadn’t seen this stuff? I’m just completely freaked out that they have now started saying that any criticism of Obama’s checkered past is an incitement to violence against him. The race card is played out, so now it’s the lynching card?
This is so beyond the pale as an effort to silence criticism that I’m just…stunned and frightened by it.
Sweet merciful heavens, can you imagine what this guy would do if he actually got elected and was in control of the US Justice Dept?
funky chicken on October 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Yes I can, which is why I’m about 100 times more nervous about this guy than I was for Kerry.
McLovin on October 9, 2008 at 10:21 AM
I’d agree. Given that “Financial Crisis” is on the front pages of newspapers and leads newscasts, McCain seems out of it if he himself focuses much time on this Ayers issue. To most people it seems as tangental as two senators arguing over who voted for which version of a bill.
McCain needs to make the case that his solution to the financial crisis is different than Obamas and is more in line with the American ideals of free enterprise and individual responsibility. He also needs to make the case that Fannie and Freddie were the faults of a corrupt Democrat culture.
McCain has one debate left, which is probably the last time he’ll have a large national audience. He better pick his topics carefully and be crystal clear and forceful.
dedalus on October 9, 2008 at 10:21 AM
CNN’s Crowley: Obama Team Wanted ‘Horrific’
Have to expose the probable reality of “Obama Team”’s “need” for financial crises. Dems blocked solutions persistently for years, Obama needed “horrific” headlines as to coerced results…
S on October 9, 2008 at 10:22 AM
exactly
funky chicken on October 9, 2008 at 10:23 AM
I thought that the concept of the story fit my fears for Sarah Palins well being much more than anything that might happen to Obama because of what was being said about him. I have seen the most de-humanizing rhetoric about that poor woman; from bloggers and main stream media “journalist”. They have repeatedly written that they “hate” her. They “hate” her family. Where the fusk was the Obama campaign when their surrogates were trashing this poor womans life?
hawkdriver on October 9, 2008 at 10:25 AM
benrand on October 9, 2008 at 8:26 AM
Somebody should give McCain a list of the people associated with The New Party and the things they’ve written and said. These are the warthog-faced buffoons who spat on our returning soldiers. These are the people who planned to explode our Pentagon and destroy our economy. These are the miserable vomitous masses who even now protest in places like Berkeley.
There was a huge outcry against the Code Pinkos for what they were saying and doing about our military.
These people are garbage. Show them spitting on our troops and burning our money and then air the footage of Palin at her debate saying, “Never again.”
justincase on October 9, 2008 at 10:26 AM
Ding ding ding!
This is just flat out lame. It’s fairly clear that no one cares about this.
John_Locke on October 9, 2008 at 10:26 AM
Sorry, I thought I heard a complete version on TV this morning. I still think an added sentence or two on details of those programs furthers the message that Obama is not the right leader for the future. I’m a partisan, so I welcome the attacks. But they need to address the middle 20% of the country. Sure, they can work to scare them (”too risky”), but, more important, they need to paint Obama as a candidate with an ideological bent that will be running us off into all kinds of nonsense when we have serious economic problems.
Just a couple of sentences more of details allows them to segue into other things in other ads: federal funds for sex ed for kindergarten kids, the Global Poverty Act. People have no idea what we’re getting with Obama.
BuckeyeSam on October 9, 2008 at 10:27 AM
One minute and forty seconds? You know who this ad is being targeted at?
– People who visit Hot Air.
– People who visit Lucianne.com.
– People who go to NRO, the Weekly Standard website, the American Spectator, etc.
You know who it’s not targeted at?
– Undecided voters.
– People who don’t already know about the Ayers-Obama connection or other questionable associations, like ACORN.
– People who don’t tune into the campaign until the weeks just prior to the election, and who are not going to actively either seek out a website just to click on a 100 second campaign video, or watch an all-news channel where discussion of that video might come up (and odds are Fox will be the only one who plays any clips of this video to begin with).
If John McCain wants this charge to stick with the voters he needs to sway in the next 3 1/2 weeks, John McCain is going to have to say it to Barack Obama’s face in Debate No. 3, no matter where Bob Schieffer steers the questioning, and John McCain is going to have to approve 30 second and one minute ads for the spots on entertainment shows that swing voters in swing states would be watching.
That means not some YouTube video cut to a length that will never be used on regular TV, and it means not sending Sarah Palin out there to do McCain’s heavy lifting, while he tries to play Mr. Bi-Partisan during the debate. If Maverick won’t do that, he’s simply running a campaign that will allow him to regain his media darling status in the Senate in 2009, after he loses the general election.
jon1979 on October 9, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »