Ifill: Palin “blew me off” during the debate
posted at 5:48 pm on October 5, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
And there wasn’t a blessed thing she could do about it — except maybe say, “Governor, with all due respect, you haven’t addressed my question.” Why didn’t she?
Full transcript here. Some interesting comments from Peggy Noonan about Palin’s brand of identity-politics populism, too.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »
Boo freaking hoo…Palin pwned her and Biden.
PierreLegrand on October 5, 2008 at 5:50 PM
she didnt worship at the altar of ifill :(
lorien1973 on October 5, 2008 at 5:51 PM
This is breaking my heart.
James OK on October 5, 2008 at 5:52 PM
Gwen Ifill is a disgrace. For agreeing to do that debate with her forthcoming to be released on inauguration day she should be shunned by her fellow journalists. The problem of course is that there aren’t any journalists left. Journalism is dead.
D0WNT0WN on October 5, 2008 at 5:52 PM
Blowing off the age of Obama book author and addressing the camera to speak the the American people was the appropriate action to take by Palin. I’m glad she did.
wise_man on October 5, 2008 at 5:53 PM
I thought this was one of the worst MTP’s I’d ever seen. For Tom Brokaw to introduce his panel and start his program with the SNL skit and NOT show the one of Queen Latifa hawking Ifil’s book, was completely wrong. After that he still did not mention the “elephant in the room” – Ifil’s book bias. It wasn’t until half way through the show that Ifil brought up her book, as a means to criticize those who questioned her.
Brokaw lost me, he’s not good enough to talk about the Greatest Generation anymore. The loser.
mngirl on October 5, 2008 at 5:53 PM
Translation: Waaaaaah! You should have been paying attention to me!!!!
NoFanofLibs on October 5, 2008 at 5:53 PM
And the nation will blow off you and your colleagues in a month.
Mark1971 on October 5, 2008 at 5:53 PM
I believe Sarah Palin passed her “make or break” debate with flying colors.
John McCain’s “make or break” debate is upcoming Tuesday to be moderated by this idiot, Tom Brokaw. Might I suggest when he begins with a SNL clip, that John “blow him off”?
Marcus on October 5, 2008 at 5:53 PM
She did kinda blow her off…and I’m glad she did. She probably could have given a few more direct answers to some of the questions, but I kinda liked how she did her own thing.
No. The idiot in McCain’s camp that allowed Ifill to moderate that debate should be fired. It’s not her fault they picked her.
malan89 on October 5, 2008 at 5:54 PM
I gotta say, the release of the Ifill book story was masterfully timed. She knows why she couldn’t press Palin. Muahaha
lodge on October 5, 2008 at 5:55 PM
Because she was restricted by her own conflict of interest. If she started being pushy with Palin, she risked being labeled as biased due to her financial interest in Obama winning. So, she had to sit there and take it.
TheBigOldDog on October 5, 2008 at 5:55 PM
Ifill has less shame than Ayers has regrets.
profitsbeard on October 5, 2008 at 5:56 PM
“The debate is about ME! MEEEEEEE!”
fossten on October 5, 2008 at 5:57 PM
What are you talking about?
fossten on October 5, 2008 at 5:57 PM
That idiot is named Lindsey Graham. And I completely agree. But there used to be this thing called journalistic ethics. She should have declined to accept.
D0WNT0WN on October 5, 2008 at 5:57 PM
And I thought I couldn’t get any more tired of Peggy “Thousand Points of Light” Noonan.
Disturb the Universe on October 5, 2008 at 5:58 PM
It’s hilarious to me that MTP thinks SNL is relevant to the elecotrate.
Ifill is an idiot.
VolMagic on October 5, 2008 at 5:58 PM
Interesting how David Gregory equates talking directly to the American people as lacking in substance. I guess substance means mollifying third-rate journalists and political hacks.
She really got under their skin. Which begs the question: Don’t the David Gregories of the world realize that Palin’s disdain for the media is a bit of welcome wholesomeness? No one likes the MSM!
EMD on October 5, 2008 at 5:58 PM
What she means is that Palin failed to whine about her book deal… which would have dramatically increased sales. In other news, the failure on Palin’s part to mention the Ifill book is one of her more racist actions to date.
CC
CapedConservative on October 5, 2008 at 5:58 PM
Hey, at least Peggy is saying what she believes now. I guess
lodge on October 5, 2008 at 5:58 PM
OFF-TOPIC: Besides the front-page coverage in the Denver Post about McCain “pulling even” (i.e., probably ahead) in the state of the styrofoam Greek columns, here’s another poll that doesn’t merit a gulp, so you might miss it around here, as McCain
leads it 68 percent to 23 percent, and as opposed to Gallup’s 600 people sample and CNN’s 700 people sample, here they sampled over 4,000.
http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2008/10/military_poll_100508w/
Marcus on October 5, 2008 at 5:59 PM
Why did I know you were going to bring this up?
I haven’t watched MTP since Tim Russet (RIP) died. I was about to puke listening to the bias they were spewing. Not one mention of Biden’s lies. And that fat slug from Des Moines….”Snap~on” was his name I think, if he were any more full of crap, little balls of doo-doo would come rolling out of his mouth.
I made it all the through and realized that even though Tim was biased also, he didn’t hold a candle to those clowns.
I have never listened to Noonan before, but she didn’t come off as knowledgeable, but rather like someone speaking to hear themselves pontificate profound and enlightened pearls of wisdom.
Does she always come off as such an elitist snob?
csdeven on October 5, 2008 at 5:59 PM
I’m sorry. I lost track. When did the SNL skit begin and end?
Star20 on October 5, 2008 at 5:59 PM
Ms. Ifill,
Bitten by the ‘cudah, yea?
Now you know what it’s like to work in an environment free from Affirmative Action quotas.
bloviator on October 5, 2008 at 6:00 PM
“Um, it’s an honor to give ten thousand dollars [to PBS]. Especially now, when the rich mosaic of cable programming has made public television so very, very unnecessary.”
/homer
saint kansas on October 5, 2008 at 6:00 PM
Ifell is a racist
Wade on October 5, 2008 at 6:01 PM
I think it’s too late in the game to suggest that she didn’t answer the questions and there was nothing anyone could do. Ms. Ifil could have asked another question in the same vein as what she wanted clarification on. Victim or hostage to the debate rules seems more than a little weak to me.
Cindy Munford on October 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM
Exactly, profitsbeard. It’s like they can look into their mirror and see an unbiased journalist when it is a democrat shill looking back at themselves.
wise_man on October 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM
I googled “snow machine road kill” and Ifill’s Wiki page popped up.
T J Green on October 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM
It was soooo sweet when Governor Palin said that she was going to talk directly to the American people, and not through the MSM filter. That was my turning point during the debate.
Someone call Ifill a Waahmbulance.
We’re Screwed ‘08;
Palin 2012!
rmgraha on October 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM
Palin should have said, “Gwen, I know that you know that if John McCain and I win this election, your book sales will suck. So how about that, Gwen? Whose side are you on anyway, Gwen? Tell the American people.”
Travis1 on October 5, 2008 at 6:05 PM
While I disagree with the Ifill selection, saying something about it before the debate would cause a self inflicted wound. The left is just waiting for a complaint and twist things around to use it against us. Sarah’s bring it on attitude demonstrates courage and a fighting spirit. Let me give you a for instance, how many times has our friend Sean Hannity invited Obama on his show? Has Obama ever been on Hannity’s show? No, Obama is a coward. We know that Obama will not face tough decisions and he avoids confrontation. He only wants the public to see only one side, and if anyone speaks against him, he becomes a victim.
mindhacker on October 5, 2008 at 6:05 PM
malan89 on October 5, 2008 at 5:54 PM
No but is her fault that she was less than honest with the Commission. Besides no one in the McCain camp has complained about the way the debate was handled.
Cindy Munford on October 5, 2008 at 6:05 PM
Gwen
She snubbed you because you are in the tank for Barry and everyone knows it.
RobCon on October 5, 2008 at 6:05 PM
Ifill: Palin
“blew me off”“didn’t genuflect before me” during the debateflipflop on October 5, 2008 at 6:06 PM
Queen Latifa did a good Ifill, she was better than the real Ifill.
Mr. Joe on October 5, 2008 at 6:07 PM
Sucks when your credibility is shattered. Actually it was back in 1992 when she was spending so much time on Bill Clinton’s campaign bus, but why bring up the past?
JammieWearingFool on October 5, 2008 at 6:07 PM
Ifill doesn’t care that Biden rolled her like a drunk, I suppose.
I’ll be looking for her book in the remainder bins after Jan. 20.
MrScribbler on October 5, 2008 at 6:08 PM
I must admit, that SNL debate take-off had me chuckling.
flipflop on October 5, 2008 at 6:08 PM
D0WNT0WN on October 5, 2008 at 5:57 PM
I think Ms. Ifil was picked well before many people had much knowledge of her book. Let’s face it if MM hadn’t busted on her I doubt it would known by much of the general public.
Cindy Munford on October 5, 2008 at 6:08 PM
If Palin didn’t bow and scrape to Ifill, it’s Ifill’s fault. She’s the one that wrote the book about Obama and she’s the one with the conflict of interest. She went into that debate knowing she couldn’t open her mouth to Palin or look crossways at her because of what critics would say. She did it to herself. She couldn’t touch Palin and Ifill had only herself to blame.
Boo freakin’ hoo is RIGHT!
Oink on October 5, 2008 at 6:09 PM
They are playing a comedy program at length?
This is supposed to be a “serious” news show, right?
Hey Tom, why not just have a Obama poster behind you already?
RobCon on October 5, 2008 at 6:09 PM
After watching Republicans prostrate themselves before the MSM for so damn long, I found it quite refreshing for Palin to effectively say, “I’m not going to play that.”
hpb on October 5, 2008 at 6:10 PM
Hmmm… not a single mention of Biden’s Gaffs and outright lies during the debate…
How predictable.
Romeo13 on October 5, 2008 at 6:10 PM
Gwen Ifill lost all credibilty by even showing up, and deserved to be blown off.
ctmom on October 5, 2008 at 6:11 PM
It’s their way to play the SNL clip that demeans Palin, and then laugh about it as they cut back to the studio where they basically agree with SNL’s take on Palin. If ever Tom Brokaw can’t do the sunday morning show, then they can ask any SNL member to fill in.
wise_man on October 5, 2008 at 6:11 PM
AAHHHHHHHHH… Aunt Esther again.
redrock on October 5, 2008 at 6:12 PM
All these “journalists” at the table and not one question about Gwen’s book? Or David Gregory’s wife involvement in Fannie and Freddie. The news business is sleeze.
RobCon on October 5, 2008 at 6:13 PM
Peggy Noonan is an elegant writer, but her reign as the executrix of the Reagan legacy is just about over. Palin may take that mantle from her with a wink, a smile and a crowbar.
Margaret, as her chum Chris Matthews calls her, has become the political straw man that Reagan ran against so successfully — the Washington media elite insider. Even when she seems to compliment Palin, her heart isn’t in it. Her comment about Palin’s debate performance — “She killed.” — became a WSJ opinion piece decrying Palin’s provincial populism.
Terrie on October 5, 2008 at 6:14 PM
It was intellectually dishonest.
The funniest part of Queen Latifah’s impersonation was the booking schilling.
CanadianGuy on October 5, 2008 at 6:14 PM
They continue to misrepresent what Palin said though. She did not say she wouldn’t answer Ifill’s questions. She said she wouldn’t answer them the way they wanted her to.
Big difference.
powerpro on October 5, 2008 at 6:15 PM
Once again, Ifill must inject herself into the news instead of reporting the news.
As to this Yepson person:
It most definitely about Ayers and Obama’s poor judgment in aligning himself with domestic terrorists. How can he perform the job when he has exhibited this type of poor judgment through out his adult life? As to this being about the future — spare me. And to quote Joe Biden, the “past is prologue”, baby! Didn’t hear you criticize him.
If it’s about putting gas in the tank, Palin’s your candidate.
One, there are no longer reputable news organizations, and two, not one criticism of the numerous lies Biden told. As someone else said, it’s easy to win a debate when you just make shit up.
Blake on October 5, 2008 at 6:15 PM
Ifill can kiss my whitey ass for all I care. I can’t stand Liberal weenie journalist’s, and a journalist that stands to profit from this election I can’t stand even more than the rest of them.
White, Black, Brown, or Yellow; a Liberal is a Liberal is a Liberal… Dumb, stupid, narrow minded, and close minded people who are the modern day zombies of the world.
Keemo on October 5, 2008 at 6:15 PM
Talk about chutzpah — from the lady who should have recused herself but didn’t and stands to benefit financially from one party’s victory — she should be considering herself lucky she didn’t get fired from her (taxpayer funded) job and shut up already.
wordwarp on October 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM
Quit whining, Ifill, you racist Obama shill. You should be shunned by the journalism community for your ridiculous conflict of interest and blatent pandering. If we could only find a journalist on MSNBC, CNN or PBS…
Philly on October 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM
Queen Latifa’s portrayal of Ifill was a very subtle dig at her. Watch her reactions to Biden’s idiotic remarks and then watch how she reacts to Sarah. She was playing Ifill as “in the tank” for Biden.
That’s how I see it anyway.
csdeven on October 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM
Does Brokaw really think that people care about what their take is on the debate? They are doing stories about themselves covering the debates now? Who gives a shit about Ifill and what she thinks?
echosyst on October 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM
Noonan is – and always has been – an insufferably pompous pundit, hopelessly in love with the lilt of her own preening prose.
And I should know, because most days I am as insufferably preening as she is.
Difference is that she, at least, has parlayed it into a decent living while I manage only aggravate the locals at HotAir.com
C’est la vie.
ManlyRash on October 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM
Terrie on October 5, 2008 at 6:14 PM
Another no so conservative to add to the round table to keep it “balanced”. Mr. Gergen must have been unavailable.
Cindy Munford on October 5, 2008 at 6:17 PM
Has any presidential debate moderator ever gone on television the Sunday after and been critical of one of the candidates before? This just seems to me to be unprecedented.
No mention of Gwen Ifill’s personal agenda in this clip, either – was there a mention of it on the program? (I admit to forwarding past the SNL nonsense.)
capitalist piglet on October 5, 2008 at 6:19 PM
I like Noonan, but she clearly has been in Washington too long. I not much for populism…but I am not so sure that Palin is the ragin’ populist that Noonan assumes she is.
Dirthead on October 5, 2008 at 6:19 PM
There was one and only one veep debate and Sarah Palin needed to maximize her presence. And she did.
The so called “journalists” can go lick their wounds because she whipped them good.
Kini on October 5, 2008 at 6:21 PM
Palin blows off Gwen while Gwen blows Barry. Seems fair to me.
SouthernGent on October 5, 2008 at 6:21 PM
Mr. Man, your charming prose is worth the aggravation. You are too funny. Please don’t stop.
Terrie on October 5, 2008 at 6:21 PM
I was breathlessly awaiting Ifill’s question on energy policy, but instead got some crap about gay marriage.
Of course, Palin would have crushed Biden on any energy issue, since she is by far the only knowlegeable candidate on the issue between the four of them (the others, McCain included, being dumb as crap on energy issues), so if that isn’t being in the tank, what is?
TexasJew on October 5, 2008 at 6:21 PM
Ifill’s next book in the making: Politics and Gender in the Age of Palin.
I expect royalties, Gwen….
locomotivebreath1901 on October 5, 2008 at 6:21 PM
Because you would whine about her being “biased”.
crr6 on October 5, 2008 at 6:21 PM
I wish I had a larger vocabulary. That is EXACTLY how she comes off.
csdeven on October 5, 2008 at 6:22 PM
A bit of humor for my pals here at HA…
My wife and I were in Billings this morning for our once a month shopping spree (fill up the pantry and freezer). We went by Big Bear Sports to get a new scope for my rifle (deer season is coming soon). At the front entrance to the store, they had a big table set up & filled to the brim with T-Shirts that read “Allergic to Obama” on the front and back, with some kind of photo also. Nothing on McCain or Palin, just the Obama shirts. While we were having some fun with these shirts, we noticed a lady giving an employee hell while calling the store “racist”. This Liberal bi*** was out of control beyond description.
We each bought one of the shirts on principle alone!
Keemo on October 5, 2008 at 6:22 PM
Amen, Mr. S! If nothing else, I will greet a McCain victory with delight for no reason other than the knowledge that Ifill’s dream of a literary killing will die at the bottom of the Amazon sales list. If schadenfreude is a sin, then Hell will have to prepare the penthouse suite for my arrival.
ManlyRash on October 5, 2008 at 6:22 PM
At least Noonan took off the palin beer goggles and admitted the whole nu-populism bit is kind of a sham. unless of course palin actually buys that stuff…in that case,
palin/huckabee, huckabee/palin 2012!
ernesto on October 5, 2008 at 6:22 PM
I’d have used her for target practice. Just saying…
ManlyRash on October 5, 2008 at 6:23 PM
I think they’re shocked that someone doesn’t give them what they consider the proper respect. The pound and pound on Palin like a bunch of tabloid gossips, and then expect her to try to impress them.
God, I hate the media. They are supposed to be the guardians of truth and freedom – and look what they’ve done with that responsibility. Look what they have become.
capitalist piglet on October 5, 2008 at 6:24 PM
Don’t skew the conversation. for the sake of….well whatever the reason is you are trying to…..
The point is that Ifill is complaining when she certainly could have followed up.
csdeven on October 5, 2008 at 6:25 PM
Keemo on October 5, 2008 at 6:22 PM
Maybe you should have tried out your new deer rifle’s scope alignment there, before hunting season.
TexasJew on October 5, 2008 at 6:25 PM
Biden overwhelmingly won the debate, and by that we mean that 52% of our independent voter panel thought Palin won.
Seixon on October 5, 2008 at 6:25 PM
Meh. I’m a bullsh!tter. You want to improve your vocabulary? Read anything and everything ever written by Bill Buckley. That man could think and he could write. God, I miss him.
ManlyRash on October 5, 2008 at 6:26 PM
Oh too bad . . . old ” in the tank for Obama” Ifill wasn’t pandered to by Palin. Ifill’s job was to ask her question then shut up and try to become invisible. She was a fixture not a participant and nobody gives a rat’s backside what she thinks.
rplat on October 5, 2008 at 6:26 PM
crr6, yes, that’s the problem with being biased. :-)
dtestard on October 5, 2008 at 6:26 PM
Gwen Ifill shoud not have been the moderator in the first place. Ifill had a clear financial conflict of interest favoring Obama that she did not report to the Presidential Debate Commission. She acted unethically and dishonestly. Her complaints now should be viewed as evidence of a character defect and as the sour grapes of a frustrated political hack. Ifill’s apparent intention was to prejudice Palin. It did not work because Palin went over Ifill’s head to the American people. Great for Sarah. Gwen deserves rebuke, contempt and retirement.
Phil Byler on October 5, 2008 at 6:27 PM
You guys didn’t cite the END of Ifill’s comments about the VP debate. She talked about being “part of the story” and blamed Republicans for trying to create a distraction from Palin.. And then she mock apologized for “getting in the way” of “an agenda.” It was absolutely insane.
Mix that with Charlie Gibson’s comment that it was necessary for the media to “expose” Palin, and I think we see that the fix truly is in.
Outlander on October 5, 2008 at 6:27 PM
But you already knew that…din’t you?
ManlyRash on October 5, 2008 at 6:27 PM
Who is this Gwen Ifill person? I recall someone with a similar name enjoying their fifteen minutes of fame the other night, are they the same person?
Bishop on October 5, 2008 at 6:29 PM
Ifill hasn’t written the Oslime-a chapter because she doesn’t know what the results will be. If he wins, she has four months to write it from the perspective that his is “The One”. If he loses, she has four months to write a chapter on how racist America destroyed “The One”.
And she’ll have lots and lots and lots of direct quotes from Oslime-a and his whitey hating militant wife.
She’s gonna make a killing.
csdeven on October 5, 2008 at 6:30 PM
Noonan is still a loser.
Hey Palin, want Noonan to like you? (I know you don’t care, neither do we) Just sprinkled vapid little phrases like hope and change.
Spirit of 1776 on October 5, 2008 at 6:30 PM
Oh good heavens, I missed that one. He said that?
Hey Charlie – I have an idea. How about you “expose” Barack Obama? Or is that just too much work?
capitalist piglet on October 5, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Agreed. Everything Obama has done in his life has been to feed his colossal, narcissistic ego and sense of superiority (it goes beyond mere entitlement), and to bring him wealth and power, exactly none of it earned. As a President, I would expect him to be at once self-indulgent and brutal toward those he regards as his personal enemies. He would literally resent anyone disagreeing with him on anything, on the principle of “Do you not perceive my greatness?”
This is why his call for a national “Volunteer Corps”, which would be little more than a modern Sturmabteilung, should worry any rational person.
But the flip side of this is even more worrisome. You see, people with this sort of personality tend to be personal cowards along with it. They seek to render others subservient because they fear them. And when confronted by determined, actual enemies, in the military/geopolitical sense of the word, they react in a cowardly manner. If they cannot co-opt, they will appease. Faced with a truly aggressive adversary, they will seek to “cut a deal” that allows them to retain their own “local” status at the expense of everyone else on their “own” side. (Think Vichy France, or the Quislings in Norway.)
If even that doesn’t work, they collapse. Completely. Because their minds cannot grasp the reality of their own fundamental unimportance, especially from a determined adversary’s point of view.
Biden is another one cut from the same cloth, as is Pelosi. Both are “creatures of the deal”, who are perfectly willing, in fact eager, to oppress their own people at the behest of any foreign influence which is, in their minds, more “enlightened”. And both believe, like Obama, that they are so transcendentally important, that they, personally, matter so much, that in such a situation, the aggressor will fall all over themselves to fulfill their wishes.
In the first months of an Obama Administration, I would expect bizarre, possibly illegal behavior on the part of the leaders that would make the Days of Rage, Nixon’s “Enemies List”, and Waco all seem like chump change by comparison.
In their first genuine foreign policy crisis, whether on the order of Cuba in October of 1962 or 9/11, I would expect them to panic, seek personal salvation from the aggressor at any cost- and when that failed, collapse like a house of cards on a table when somebody slams a door.
Remember, you heard it here first.
clear ether
eon
eon on October 5, 2008 at 6:31 PM
LOL
FTW!
funky chicken on October 5, 2008 at 6:31 PM
You more often than not amuse or fire up the team here, my friend.
Patrick S on October 5, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Please, keep crying MSM and all the other yahoo’s. Oh, Yahoo is an internet thing.
foxone on October 5, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Ie they might tell the truth. This woman irritates the piss outta me.
Spirit of 1776 on October 5, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Reading Peggy Noonan’s writing is like eating a dozen donuts in one sitting. It takes too long and puts you to sleep by the time you’re done. And if you can keep from throwing up half-way through, you’re one of the lucky ones.
capitalist piglet on October 5, 2008 at 6:33 PM
Let me understand this cause, ya know, maybe it’s me, I’m a little f***ed up maybe, but I’m funny how? I mean funny like I’m a clown, I amuse you? I make you laugh, I’m here to f*****g amuse you? You said I’m funny. How the f**k am I funny, what the f**k is so funny about me? Tell me, tell me what’s funny.
:-)
ManlyRash on October 5, 2008 at 6:33 PM
Have allergies? RACIST
lol
funky chicken on October 5, 2008 at 6:34 PM
I {HEART} YOU CAPITALIST PIGLET
funky chicken on October 5, 2008 at 6:35 PM
That’s for me (who freely confess I am a snob) the least palatable thing she has to present. Derbyshire (who is not a snob) had some good things to say about her attitude towards Wall Street “corruption”.
Tzetzes on October 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM
Ha! HaHa!HAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAAAAA!
I almost snarfed my beer when I read that!
lsutiger on October 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM
No kidding.
She’s one of those people that like to hear themselves talk. She is way over impressed with herself for someone was myopic as to think Obama is a positive force in politics. Fine, but don’t pretend to represent us, and don’t pretend to understand (and diminish) a real positive for us in politics. Ugh.
Spirit of 1776 on October 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM
I {HEART} you back, funky chicken. : )
capitalist piglet on October 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »