Youse guys,

Check out http://www.rightchange.com….it takes on the whole left-wing Obumble change meme

with a nice butt-whoopin! Also, the two newest commercials featured on the site take square aim at the Democrap hand in the economic crises….names are named

I looked at that site–those ads are GREAT!!! Short, concise, to the point! But do they plan to run them on TV in swing states?

If so, maybe we should stop giving to the RNC and send our contributions to rightchange.com–they seem to know what they’re doing!

A careful reading of the questions Gwen Ifill asked during the VP debate reveals several that displayed her bias.

The forced-choice question aims to force an answer from a choice of options defined by the interviewer.

During the VP debate, Ifill used forced-choice questions to further her biases. (2 examples)

The Bias-Premised Question (5 examples)

The Contrived Dichotomy Question (1 example)

To conclude that Gwen Ifill’s moderating efforts displayed through her questions were without bias requires a willing suspension of disbelief.

American Thinker
October 06, 2008
Gwen Ifill’s VP Debate Bias
By Lee Cary

BuckeyeSam on October 5, 2008 at 8:10 AM

I agree 100 percent. McCain needs to get off his dead ass and fight. And that doesn’t mean letting Palin do it all for him. They have to run hard hitting ads on Obama’s MANY grotesque shortcomings to drive the news cycle.

An old hippy dj in San Francisco used to have the signature line “If you don’t like the news, go out and make some of your own.” McCain needs to make the news with scorched earth attacks on Obama’s scuzzy background and associates in order to bring those into the news because, guess what, the media won’t do it! You’d think the McCain camp would have figured that out by now but apparently they haven’t.

Check out http://www.rightchange.com….it takes on the whole left-wing Obumble change meme

with a nice butt-whoopin! Also, the two newest commercials featured on the site take square aim at the Democrap hand in the economic crises….names are named

Democrats for Principle, anti-Obama ad: “Would you buy a used car from this man?”

http://tdg.typepad.com/democrats_for_principle_b/2008/09/would-you-buy-a-used-car-from-this-man.html

On the positive front, she needs to bring home the fact that McCain tried to reform Fannie and Freddie in 2005, and push the Drill Baby Drill plan!

She said that she would spread her wings and soar…now is the time for her to take off!!!

McCain, “What are you prepared to do?”

—
I agree – and I just wrote a long bit on three 90 second ads I’d love to McCain put out – on my winface.com site.
I’ll try to paste it below..:

—

1)

McCain – looking straight at the Camera. “I’m John McCain, and I approved this message – it’s about why I worked to get the bailout bill passed, and why it’s a bad bill.

The bill had to pass to protect the American home owner – this wasn’t about politics, it was about your mortgage, your bank, your credit card, and your money.

But this mess was created by politics – not by Wall Street, by Congress. We warned them it would happen, and it did – We tried to stop it, in 1999, in 2002, in 2006, and again last year but Democrats in Congress stonewalled us every time.

So the emergency happened, as it had to – and now we had to pass this bill; but make no mistake: it’s a bad bill putting the American taxpayer at risk to patch a broken system. An emergency action, not a fix.

At this point We could no nothing else -but I promise you that if Sarah and I are elected, we’ll go after the roots of this thing like you’ve never seen and clean up this mess so it’ll never happen again.

— 2) McCain – looking straight at the Camera. “I’m John McCain, and I approved this message – it’s about some of the things in the bailout bill that shouldn’t be there.

The bill responds to a real financial emergency – one with consequences that go far beyond Wall Street – to your bank, your mortgage, your credit. As passed, the bill is a compromise and to get even that passed I suspended my campaign, went to Washington, and did my job as a senator – while my opponent went to the gym and practiced his debate answers.

As a senator I sometimes have to do distasteful things. In this case, to get the votes needed to get a necessary bill passed I twisted arms, made promises, and agreed to letting Democrats put things in the bill that simply don’t belong there – like exemptions on carbon taxes and wooden arrows. But that’s the Democrat way: to them no pork means no progress, and they’re perfectly willing to screw the country to get what they want.

It has to end – but only you can end it. Take a good look at the democrats running in your district and your state: if they’re people who put themselves ahead of their country, – throw them out. Send people to Washington Sarah and I can work with.

My friends, if we work together we can fix this – Please. Do your part, vote them out – and I promise you this: we’ll do ours.

3) McCain – looking straight at the Camera. “I’m John McCain, and I approved this message – it’s about the blame game being played about the credit bailout.

I think you know I don’t agree with people like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid very often: both of them have been blaming President Bush and the Republican urge to deregulate for the credit crisis and they know that’s not right, but to them it’s not about the country, not about you: to them everything’s all about them, about politics, about taking partisan advantage no matter what.

But I’ll say this for them: when the president called a meeting at the Whitehouse, they were ready – my opponent in this election was not. When ordered to come, he came: when Pelosi and Reid gave him control of the meeting, he had nothing to say – he had to ask what the Paulsen proposal was. When he did speak, he spoke from deep ignorance – no knowledge, no depth, no understanding: partisan, leftwing, unthought through rhetoric you’d expect from his close friend and mentor Mr. Jeremiah Wright, not from a serious candidate for the office of the Presidency.

I know this sounds like a smear so I ask you this my friends: ask the other people who were there – ask Henry Paulsen, a man I think should be fired; ask Mr. Bush; ask Reid and Pelosi. Ask them what he said, how he acted – ask them if this is the man they really want answering that 3AM call.

The “grannies for peace” are starting to cuss at the Mc side now in a “walk by” assalt.

Things are winding down now at 12:01. I guess I’ll start heading back up the hill to SacTown.

I hope someone over at HA has read this.

I’ll start the vid editing tonight for all to see on YouTube.

Over

This gig was suppose to start at 11:00 am, 11:22 now. Everyone who is anyone is inside the Hotel I guess.

more in a few.

over.

lodge on October 5, 2008 at 10:01 AM

ANNCR repeats: Surrender, socialism, sub-prime mortgages. Vote Democrat.

Awesome ad idea… but I would change the last line voiceover. Instead:

“Surrender, socialism, sub-prime mortgages… is America ready for Obama’s type of CHANGE?”

Theres’ one network doing honest reporting at least!

Over here on the “side of the right” to give you all an up date.

Loony crowd, about 300.

Mc side about the same but scatered around a bit more.

Loons started to harass an older gent, got it all on vid.

I keep walking right thru the middle of them. They are wise to who I am now.

More later, things are warming up.

Over.

It is incumbant upon the man who would be the Republican representative for POTUS to not let stand the idea the Dems have stated that capitlism, the free market, deregulation
are responsible for this economic mess it goes to the heart of our society and our free market system, it must be refuted.

It is not too late in fact Tuesday may be the best place to send the message as the debate be highly viewed and unfiltered.
A bold approach would name the names, as McCain said he would, make them famous, as McMaverick said he would, hold them accountable, as Mr. Bi-Partisan said he would and state the truth as the straight talk express says it will.

The dems have walked to the end of the branch by blaming Repubs and Bush it is time to saw that branch off NOW!

If Manson’s people had murdered a prominent Republican instead of Hollywood types, maybe he could be a professor in Chicago today as well. Afer all, HE never actually murdered anyone. HE was “non-fatal”.

CC

“Sarah, the gloves are off, the heels are on, go get to them.”

during the tumultuous Vietnam War era four decades ago.

Hey… Charles Manson’s group sliced and diced way back then too but I don’t think it would be wise to pal around with him today…. even IF he fixed he Nazi scar.

CC