nonfatal explosions at the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol

What about

San Francisco Police Sergeant Brian V. McDonnell who was killed by a pipe bomb set off on the window ledge of the San Francisco Police Department Park Station on February 16, 1970.

It is suspected that Obama’s neighbor and Ayers’ wife, Bernardine Dohrn, was involved.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weatherman_(organization)#Anti-personnel_bomb_set_on_window-ledge_in_San_Francisco

And, I don’t recall Sarah Palin limiting her claim to just one terrorism friendly radical. Just for starters, Bernadine Dohrn and Mike Klonsky come to mind!

Trochilus on October 5, 2008 at 11:26 AM

Exactly. Klonsky’s role as Obama’s Communist blogger and as the recipient of the CAC’s largesse is one of the most important, yet largely untold, stories of this election.

As for Dohrn the McCain campaign should have an ad using this audio & video footage, using her own voice saying, “Hello, I’m going to read a declaration of a state of war…”

Since when is calling out Obama’s unrepentant domestic terrorist pals “racist” — pals of his who became his pals well AFTER those bombings took place, and which he knew or should have known had taken place (it was in all the papers)?

They did indeed bomb several facilities here in the United States, and tried in other instances. But Barry and his pal Ayers participated in funding them — e.g., Klonsky. Barry even gave Klonsky a “leveraged” microphone on his website!

The really egregious point about the NY Times article, is that it gives cover to the rest of the mainstream press to not only question, but to even ridicule Sarah Palin when she makes the valid connection between the two men!

For example, Jim Kuhnhenn of the AP has written a story, “Palin Says Obama “Palling Around With Terrorists,” in which he notes:

Palin’s reference was to Bill Ayers, one of the founders of the group the Weather Underground. Its members took credit for bombings, including nonfatal explosions at the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol, during the tumultuous Vietnam War era four decades ago. Obama, who was a child when the group was active, served on a charity board with Ayers several years ago and has denounced his radical views and activities.

and later, more to the point:

Palin cited a New York Times story published Saturday that detailed Obama’s relationship with Ayers. In an interview with CBS News earlier in the week, Palin didn’t name any newspapers or magazines that had shaped her view of the world.Summing up its findings, the Times wrote: “A review of records of the schools project and interviews with a dozen people who know both men, suggest that Mr. Obama, 47, has played down his contacts with Mr. Ayers, 63. But the two men do not appear to have been close. Nor has Mr. Obama ever expressed sympathy for the radical views and actions of Mr. Ayers, whom he has called ’somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8.’” (my emphasis

)
In other words, AP, which has national leverage, is directly asserting that the NY Times already disproved her “questionable” claim!

Had there been no other stories or research to the contrary, that might have been a standard press response from a lazy AP reporter.

But how does Kuhnhenn get around Kurtz, or Diamond, or any of several prominent writers who have done original research and proved otherwise? How does he get around the fundraiser alone, in saying they are nat particularly close?

I think the right word is “propaganda.”

And, I don’t recall Sarah Palin limiting her claim to just one terrorism friendly radical. Just for starters, Bernadine Dohrn and Mike Klonsky come to mind!

These guys are evil.

Mojave Mark on October 4, 2008 at 7:19 PM

Here’s more!

But, of course, John McCain’s defense is that he was performing his patriotic duty, and that’s what William Ayers would have said, too.

Just One Minute writes: Now, how about the question of whether Bill Ayers has a hard-left educational philosophy shared by Barack Obama? My guess is that soccer moms (and dads) would be interested to learn about that. Well, yes I would, thanks for thin…

The Reverend Wright controversy got tons of traction only because there were VIDEOS. Didn’t require any sort of analysis by reading, just watching.

But now we have a situation where Obama Osama really appears to be up to his neck in excrement. There is so much there, there about the Ayers relationshio. Enough to warrant call-in attacks on two occasions during Chicago radio interviews with Fedderico (sp?) and Stanley Kurtz. The Obama camp wanted those two guys silenced and put out the call-in hit. And as a result, the bots performed and verbally assaulted both the host and the guests.

Now we have the NYT cover piece, as they sense that Johny Mac may be taking the gloves off.

Unfortunately, since we don’t have Smokin’ Gun type video, the American Sheeple just won’t get the Ayers controversy. Just like they are unable to associate democratic guilt with the financial crisis.

McCain better get out that can of whoopas, unscrew the cap and let that skinny biatch boy have it.

If he doesn’t, the world is going to CHANGE and we will be screwed, beyond belief.

That’s how the Prophet Barack described William Ayers, a radical Leftist University of Illinois professor of Education and former (and unrepentant) Weather Underground terrorist. Obama has been severely criticized from the Right for his association w…

Buy Danish on October 4, 2008 at 6:21 PM

That’s an astonishing quote. Hey terrorist kill people, American military kills people, so what’s the big difference?

These guys are evil.