Palin talks gays, feminism, abortion, and evolution with Couric; Update: Video added
posted at 8:33 pm on September 30, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
I waited an hour for CBS to post the video. No luck. I’m uploading my own cut so stand by for that; when their version goes up, I’ll swap it in. In the meantime, here’s the transcript. Remember, the rap on Palin is that she’s supposedly a “Christianist” nut ready to impose theocracy at the first opportunity. Here we learn that she supports contraception; doesn’t want to punish abortion with jail time; supports teaching evolution as “an accepted principle” and may very well oppose teaching creationism (it’s ambiguous); and reaffirms that she doesn’t judge gays, partly because she’s had a close friend who’s gay for decades.
And yet. Read through it and tell me what the media will lead with tomorrow. Here’s a hint: It has nothing to do with her policy answers.
Update: Here’s the vid.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 Next »
Now THAT’s funny, Kat. Well spoken.
Subsunk
Subsunk on September 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM
…she was on national television. It was important.
Maybe, she’s human enough to have been flustered? Humans get flustered, you know.
Maybe she doesn’t rise to the level of omniscient comicbook superheroine — were she to do so, and throw x-ray vision and flight into the bargain, I’m sure you’d still not vote for her — but I can see a person when I look at her.
…I can’t say the same for Obama. I look at him, I see someone who might be able to ask your all-important question…and then play footsy with the Constitution for four dark years….
Puritan1648 on September 30, 2008 at 10:10 PM
Please, Palin would have had to tick off three dozen publications just to keep from getting the “My GOD, she doesn’t read Newsweek or Forbes or the Gay Pride Weekly!”
Bishop on September 30, 2008 at 10:10 PM
Yeah!!! PUMAs are fun! I actually started to admire Hilary during the primaries when she became a moderate. I even like her sleazy cheating husband, Billy Jeff now (although she should really ditch his cheating ass already).
Illinidiva on September 30, 2008 at 10:10 PM
LOL. THAT’s gonna leave a mark.
Subsunk
Subsunk on September 30, 2008 at 10:10 PM
You guys who are fretting are nuts. This is an interview that Ronald Reagan would give.
I do not blame her one bit for not naming what newspaper she reads or magazine. I can remember almost that exact same question being tossed at Reagan way back when and he dodged it also.
LOL I read the comments here first before watching the video clip you guys are way out of bounds and fretting too much take a deep breath. She did fine in the interview.
She will do fine Thursday night. Do not worry.
Jdripper on September 30, 2008 at 10:10 PM
FIFY – again.
Religious_Zealot on September 30, 2008 at 10:11 PM
So if she said she read the NYT or the Jerusalem Post- they would have a story on that as well.
You can’t win either way !!!
defendfaithandfamily on September 30, 2008 at 10:11 PM
Did I mention how scary it is that this moron gets to vote?
MobileVideoEngineer on September 30, 2008 at 10:11 PM
Totally agree. I have not had a subscription to a newspaper for nearly 10 years. HOTAIR gives me all the news I need :-)
ConservativePartyNow on September 30, 2008 at 10:11 PM
Or consider the Eat Shit and Die Tribune.
hawkdriver on September 30, 2008 at 10:11 PM
There’s a difference between cannot and did not. And only one is true.
Connie on September 30, 2008 at 10:11 PM
Allahpundit, I am begging you, throw this Astroturfing POS to the curb.
jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 10:11 PM
Darn right I am. Even if I commented on a “liberal State blog.” What part of PUMA do you not understand?
And don’t deflect my charge. Show me this “enthusiastic Palin support.” I’ve seen nothing from your comments over multiple threads other than your own special brand of P.D.S.
Your “concern” is noted. Some of us are more concerned with putting country first and keeping this nation out of the hands of an incredibly inexperienced hands of an Obama administration.
You say you were “an enthusiastic Palin supporter!” and to check your comment history.
I could also claim over the internet that I’m an unwed minority woman who experienced rape and had to have an abortion, and — by extension — am “OFFENDED!” by Sarah Palin’s comments. It’s the internet. You can make up anything you want.
Back your claims up with some sort of record. Not empty rhetoric. After all, that is a Barack Obama trait.
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 10:12 PM
Sarah probably didn’t want to disclose that she reads the Limbaugh Letter along with Combat Handguns.
Go Sarah!!!!
John Doe on September 30, 2008 at 10:12 PM
I have 10 windows open at any given time.
Connie on September 30, 2008 at 10:12 PM
My apologies to Religious Zealot. I remember from teh wheel that you’re not fond of profanity. But Phil wants to know what we read.
hawkdriver on September 30, 2008 at 10:13 PM
@ Vince on September 30, 2008 at 10:03 PM
I don’t get how I am naive. Katie asked a gimme easy question, and if you watch it, was taken aback at how Palin wouldnt answer. After that, she pressed HARD because she thought she could get Palin, and she did. Palin could have EASILY answered the question a multitude of ways. ie. I read a variety of sources such as … or I don’t form my worldview from newspapers and magazines … or I tend to get my news online from sites such as …
Any of those would have been fine questions and nobody would think about them again. If she was trying to avoid a gotcha moment, she walked right into one, as EVERY news outlet will be running with her non answer.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 10:13 PM
Spare me the butthurt and spin. It’s obvious she doesn’t read newspapers. Or else she would have named one, be it a local rag or something like Washington Times or Wall Street Journal.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 10:13 PM
Good Lord … This much attention over a VP candidate and what she declined to say. I wish these folks would be so aggressive asking the media about Obama, his glaring inexperience and all those issues he declines to talk about.
darwin on September 30, 2008 at 10:13 PM
FIFY – yet again.
Religious_Zealot on September 30, 2008 at 10:14 PM
Gold Star…………… you can go to the head of the class.
Seven Percent Solution on September 30, 2008 at 10:14 PM
Phil,
What do you read?
Vince on September 30, 2008 at 10:14 PM
So Allah, is this what you thought? Is the lack of specificity on the reading material what you expect the media to key in on? The Sen. Obama supporters certainly have their drawers in a wad about it. To me is seems trifling.
Cindy Munford on September 30, 2008 at 10:14 PM
Yeah … whatever. I suppose Baracky doesn’t read much either seeing as he thinks there are 57 states and didn’t know Russia is on the UN Security Council and has a veto.
darwin on September 30, 2008 at 10:15 PM
Next time………….. open the jar of mayonnaise.
Seven Percent Solution on September 30, 2008 at 10:15 PM
Sure, I get that. Humans get flustered all the time when they’re on camera.
However, this person was a television reporter and the governor of a large state, with executive duties. A person who gets flustered and “blinks” before someone as vapid as Katie Couric is not someone I want in the White House potentially representing my country in a staredown between USA and Russia.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 10:16 PM
FIFY
Religious_Zealot on September 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM
“butthurt” is a term frequently used by /b/-tards.
You know, the same /b/-tards that hacked Palin’s Yahoo! e-mail account.
The same sort that created the offensive article about Sarah Palin on their coveted Encyclopedia Dramatica (google at your own peril).
Anyone who uses “butthurt” is no friend of this ticket. AP, really, blast the astroturfer that is philnewkirk off of HotAir.
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM
I nominate philnewkirk for stupidest line of attack by a troll Evah!
darwin on September 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM
Too many people are crapping their pants over Palin sucking at interviews. She can hold her own in a debate (google clips of her in the Alaska governor debate). I for one am happy to see expectations so damn low. It’ll greatly amplify her success when she mops the floor with Biden’s arrogant smirking face.
Darth Executor on September 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 10:13 PM
Maybe she has the internet. Oh the humanity, no pages to turn.
Cindy Munford on September 30, 2008 at 10:18 PM
You’re a jerk. You spend most of your day at HuffPo and Kos, I’m sure. I can just tell by your comments.
Connie on September 30, 2008 at 10:18 PM
Again, how do you know what she does or does not read? In fact, she said the opposite that she reads a variety of sources. Do live or work with her?
terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 10:19 PM
@ lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 10:12 PM
I understand PUMA fine, its a stupid acronym. Someone who was a Clinton supporter is going to come here and question conservatives on their support for conservatives?
I have to ask, why do you support McCain for president, given your initial support for Hillary Clinton? What positions of hers do you find in McCain and not in Obama?
And if you are really interested in my comments on this site, copy this into google without the quotation marks:
“site:hotair.com muyoso palin”
That will bring up all of my comments on Palin, ever.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 10:19 PM
lol!
Spirit of 1776 on September 30, 2008 at 10:19 PM
I noticed the same thing, but didn’t feel like pointing it out. Thanks. I feel like anyone who is familiar with the inner workings of 4chan shouldn’t exactly be open about that. Its really a sick place. But yeah, it really shows that phil is remarkably immature. Next thing he’ll be calling us “f*gs”
jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 10:20 PM
Seven Percent Solution on September 30, 2008 at 10:14 PM
Thank you! And at the risk of appearing to butter you up, very fine form this evening.
Cindy Munford on September 30, 2008 at 10:20 PM
Wicked sense of humor, ma’am. Just wicked. LOL.
Subsunk
Subsunk on September 30, 2008 at 10:20 PM
Wait, we should let them scream this as loud as possible. The average American doesn’t give a crap if she reads the NYT, LAT, WaPo, ChiTrib, or Newsweek (as seen by their plunging subscriptions and their enormous layoffs and monetary losses).
The more they scream this, the more their hatred and stupidity is exposed. Go ahead idiots, take this rope and run with it.
MobileVideoEngineer on September 30, 2008 at 10:20 PM
Who was it that said “those who do not read newspapers are uninformed, and those who read newspapers are misinformed?”
And screw all this crap…the democrats have a total idiot that thinks we can solve the oil crisis by properly inflating our tires.
John Doe on September 30, 2008 at 10:20 PM
Spirit of 1776 on September 30, 2008 at 10:19 PM
Oh man … that would have gone down in history.
darwin on September 30, 2008 at 10:20 PM
It’s fair Phil that she should be able to say at least one for you. I can’t believe she didn’t just blurt out “Saturday Evening Liberals Suck”
hawkdriver on September 30, 2008 at 10:20 PM
There, fixed up right for you.
Religious_Zealot on September 30, 2008 at 10:21 PM
Game. Set. Match.
jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 10:21 PM
No, not “too many people.” Just paid, $7/hr Obama for America web trolls. This is an extension of “get in their face.”
It happened on blogs re: Hillary. It happened to the PUMA sites that emerged during the Democratic split. Places like “The Confluence” kicked the Obama trolls out pretty good.
HotAir is better than other big conservative sites because registration isn’t always open. But if it were, we’d be seeing quite a bit more of this “concern.”
Don’t buy the snake oil these “concerned Republicans” are selling. We PUMAs saw the same thing for months regarding Hillary Clinton.
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 10:21 PM
For you…………….. to cool your “butthurt”.
I wonder what newspaper he reads, or printed this……………..?
Seven Percent Solution on September 30, 2008 at 10:22 PM
Dude. She reads papers. She’s read them daily since she was a kid. You saying she doesn’t isn’t going to change that fact.
Spirit of 1776 on September 30, 2008 at 10:23 PM
Muyoso is an astroturfing pumpwielder.
Sakaki on September 30, 2008 at 10:23 PM
I loved her newspaper answer… but she had me after she whacked Johnny Macs shoulder in Maverick friendship.
Sweet!!!!!!!!!!
Shivas Irons on September 30, 2008 at 10:23 PM
@Fortunata on September 30, 2008 at 9:06 PM
woah…the economist full of shit? cmon, theres more raw fact per paragraph there than just about anywhere else.
ernesto on September 30, 2008 at 10:24 PM
I’ll defend him against this one, as much as I disagree with him sometimes. Muyoso is a real member of this blog, I’m sure he’s been here longer than I have. I’m not sure why he’s pushing this “Palin doesn’t read” thing, but whatever.
jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 10:25 PM
Obama’s tactics seem eerily familiar. Training camps, Obama youth, thug lawyers, intimidation … hmmmm, I just can’t seem to place it.
darwin on September 30, 2008 at 10:25 PM
Hmmmm Phil, it seems as if lansing quaker has figured you out. A /b/-tard eh? My question should have been how old are you not what do you read.
Vince on September 30, 2008 at 10:25 PM
No wonder PUMA’s are pissed.
darwin on September 30, 2008 at 10:26 PM
*Star Trek Sulu voice* .. Oh My.
(I’d “*” out only the “*” parts of that word, if I knew what part of the single part of that word I should “*” out. At least when you “*” out the “F” word, its pretty obvious.)
wise_man on September 30, 2008 at 10:26 PM
There, fixed up right for you.
Religious_Zealot on September 30, 2008 at 10:21 PM
Pwned the noob astroturfer. Good job.
Calm Before the Storm on September 30, 2008 at 10:26 PM
BUT Spirit,
She’s a Christian!!! She’s a Republican!!! She’s from a small town!!! Of course she’s not “worldly,” therefore, she doesn’t read the New York Times! IT’S OBVIOUS!
terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 10:26 PM
Allah’s had another good day. Well done, I can hardly wait for tomorrow. Lord knows what Nuggets Allah will
dig upprovide for us beleivers.Fuquay Steve on September 30, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Wow, when was this and why didn’t the media tell us…
Oh, never mind.
hawkdriver on September 30, 2008 at 10:27 PM
@ Sakaki on September 30, 2008 at 10:23 PM
If you are complementing my phallic prowess, let me thank you.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Folks, muyoso is a PaulTard. ‘Nuff said.
And philnewjerk is just one of the many Obambi truth squad members that have decided it would be a good thing to take up residence under the HA overpass here on the information superhighway (damn… haven’t heard that one since al-gore ivented the internet).
I find the ignorance on display amusing. Newspapers nationwide have been in a steady decline for years now. Magazines are getting thinner and thinner as readership and advertising has moved from dated printed info to continually updated electronic news sources that allow us a much richer local and global scope.
This downfall was greatly hastened by the slow choking death of objective journalism, which was thrown over in favor of saul alinski’s slow but steady strategies of socialist infiltration.
But that stuff doesn’t sell. So print media like newspapers and magazines will eventually die.
techno_barbarian on September 30, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Interesting.
You on 4chan. Huh.
You on technology.
You being anti-McCain, Romney, Thompson, and Huckabee.
You calling someone a “McCain shill.”
And that was just the first few links of that vatic google result.
My diagnosis?
You’re an elitist /b/-tard, and possibly a Ron Paul supporter since he is the only person you’ve praised out of all of these comments.
/b/ tard, thy name is muyoso.
Go back to Obama for America, or back to 4chan.
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 10:28 PM
Apparently she’s not “enlightened” enough to aborts her Downs child either. That really drives them insane.
darwin on September 30, 2008 at 10:28 PM
I absolutely love her.
Metro on September 30, 2008 at 10:28 PM
I wish to God I had never read a single newspaper in my entire life. More is the pity…
Calm Before the Storm on September 30, 2008 at 10:28 PM
@ jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 10:25 PM
No, I am not saying she doesn’t read at all. I am saying, she should have just answered the damn question. Either truthfully however one sided her reading material is, or embellished a bit and added in some liberal rags to even out her image. Not answering such an easy question is the worst thing you could do.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 10:30 PM
Yeah! So? That makes them all whiny babies. If you think I give two farts in a whirlwind what a G*d damned reporter thinks about ANYTHING, you don’t know how Momma Subsunk raised her kids to be a little bit warier of the press than the average American. Because she WAS an editor for a newspaper. And she is pissed as Hell about journalism today. As far as she, and I, are concerned, there hasn’t been an honest journalist since Huntley and Brinkley, except for Jim Lehrer and Brit Hume. And she’s right.
By the way, you’re still a whiny baby. Grow a pair. Of what I don’t know, but something’s gotta be underneath all that panic and tempest in your teapot, girlie.
Subsunk
Subsunk on September 30, 2008 at 10:30 PM
Well, muyoso? Are you a Ron Paul supporter?
wise_man on September 30, 2008 at 10:30 PM
@ techno_barbarian on September 30, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Former Paul-tard. I still support a majority of his ideas, as do a lot of people on this site, but he was a little too kooky to be viable as a candidate. And the racist newsletters didnt help much either.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 10:31 PM
Maybe. But the fact that they won’t ascribe their journalism to any particular person, i.e. name and shame them, has always bugged me. After all, you can get pure FACTS from AP or any other newsfeed. And I don’t believe that they’re so lofty, above-it-all etc etc that they couldn’t possibly be partisan.
Fortunata on September 30, 2008 at 10:31 PM
She did great. She has learned quickly and she has learned well that the MSM has an agenda against anything good. She said a lot when she was vague. She told Couric she was on to her game and went on to beat her at it. Couric wanted a gotcha. Palin was wise to see it for what it was and denied Couric her mischief. Palin’s kung-fu was stronger than Katie’s.
Palin is going to be just fine.
Guardian on September 30, 2008 at 10:31 PM
Katie has some frontbutt going on there. When Rush refers to her as “The perky Katie Couric” I don’t think that’s what he meant. That may change.
pugwriter on September 30, 2008 at 10:31 PM
lol
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 10:31 PM
Heil Obama!!
Seig!
HEIL!!!
Calm Before the Storm on September 30, 2008 at 10:32 PM
That’s all they make? Why don’t we offer them double to guard our McCain/Palin yard signs. Someone keeps stealing mine. I guess it’s because my party is so popular.
hawkdriver on September 30, 2008 at 10:32 PM
It’s a lot less than trifling, Cindy.
Like everyone else, I’m kind of wishing that the McCainiacs had doubled down on Sarah!, shopped her around to the point that by now people would be used to her and she’d be handling interviews like an old hand, but such seeminly obvious conclusions are always easier to see in retrospect – and as a matter of fact “retrospect” hasn’t arrived yet. We won’t really be able to judge until the end of the campaign how she was handled, and what seems obvious now may not seem so obvious later on.
I think we’re back almost to where we were before the Convention speech, though frankly I was feeling a lot more confident then, based on the Dayton debut, than I am now based on Gibson and Couric. I still think she has a chance to grab back a big piece of the change label from Obamabiden.
It’s easy to see how McCain lost his post-Convention lead in the polls: The disappearance of Palinmania as anything other than a base phenomenon coming at the same time as the economy and financial scandal have dominated the headlines. The two things work together, and have created a bad synergy for McCain. If Palin can personalize the economic crisis as the working class representative she is, presenting herself as the only authentic new voice on the national scene at a time that the entire national leadership has been found wanting, she can still turn this thing around.
Of course, she has to pass the bar of competency, but independents and swing voters have already demonstrated a willingness, even an eagerness to accept her that is, needless to say, largely lacking among the nation’s pseudo-intelligentsia from George Will to certain bloggers.
She doesn’t have to out-Biden Biden. She only has to out-Palin him.
CK MacLeod on September 30, 2008 at 10:32 PM
No matter if this was a lead into an attack, and I can’t imagine it is…I despise people when they refuse to just answer simple questions. If you won’t answer what newspapers or magazines you read on a regular basis, don’t offer to give an interview to begin with!
I like her, but she comes off very poorly. I read that (haven’t watched it yet) and wanted to scream.
TheBlueSite on September 30, 2008 at 10:32 PM
LITTLE BLUESHIRTS
gracie on September 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM
Hey philnewkirk, have you stopped eying little girls with bad intent yet?
csdeven on September 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM
And in the first page of results, you:
- Discuss visiting 4chan.
- Discuss and ridicule comments based on tech-know.
- Trash all Republican candidates for Pres (except Ron Paul).
So you’re either just a nihilistic /b/-tard, a Ron Paul groupie, or a combination of both. I see nothing in any of that first page of results that ever demonstrated you were enthusiastic about Palin but she has since so “disappointed” you.
$7/hr courtesy of Obama for America! Or perhaps you can go back to 4chan?
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM
I wasn’t aware being a supporter of the Palin/McCain ticket is a prerequisite for posting on HA.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM
IMPORTANT BREAKING NEWS ALERT
I know this is a Michelle owned site, but have you all seen This?
I’ve had more than my fill of this. Does anyone have any ideas about what could be done?
I know that we would never, ever, ever, under any circumstances, for any reason want to do anything that could be construed in any way whatsoever as being even the slightest bit racist.
So I guess we’ll just sit quietly while our last hope gets blindsided.
Here comes the death blow.
Dorvillian on September 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM
@ Subsunk on September 30, 2008 at 10:30 PM
Well, muyoso thinks that subsunk already had her mind made up a LONG time ago who she was voting for, and therefor doesnt matter AT ALL, for the next 30 days. The ONLY people that matter over the next 30 days are the people who don’t vote on policy, but rather appearance and fancy speeches. You don’t win elections appealing only to your base, you have to bring in the independents.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM
OMG! I would have paid to see her say, “I read the bible and get all of my inspiration from the word of God.”
Katie’s head would have exploded!
Kat_Mo on September 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM
Could be worse. You could be a McCain supporter.
wise_man on September 30, 2008 at 10:34 PM
Hey Phil, honestly, regardless of how you feel about anyone else, all this quasi-religious Obama stuff doesn’t creep you out?
Calm Before the Storm on September 30, 2008 at 10:34 PM
You know what I like about her? They can’t/don’t attack her ideas or what she represents, they just attack her style. That shows how much resonance she has with the average American.
I mean, everybody gets a good laugh out of a telepromterless Obama, but no conservative is unwilling to talk about his piss-poor policies.
Spirit of 1776 on September 30, 2008 at 10:35 PM
+ 1
DUDE
LodeStar on September 30, 2008 at 10:35 PM
What specifically are you pointing out – the lead story on that page of the debate “moderator” who is in the tank for Obama?
wise_man on September 30, 2008 at 10:36 PM
@ lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM
Oh you found me out with your investigative journalism. HOW did you ever find out all my terrible secrets, oh thats right, I told you what to search to find them.
No answer my questions about why you support McCain? Is it seriously because there is some female reproductive organs on the ticket alone?
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 10:37 PM
I’m glad to hear from her own mouth that science should be taught in science class. Now I wonder what is the real story behind the story/rumor regarding asking the librarian if they would be willing to remove books that people might find offensive. If I were in charge of hiring a librarian I might ask that question. If the answer was yes I would not hire that librarian.
So many smears………
deewhybee on September 30, 2008 at 10:37 PM
It’s not about the money. People that do this for “Obama” are of the same breed as any other college “activist”: from a higher-middle-income family and don’t need to try and get a job that pays a living salary.
They have the luxury to go and “intern” for Obama by spamming sites that criticize him. Or bias web polling. Or what-have-you. Money is no object — “it’s the issues, man!!!!”
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 10:38 PM
philnewkirk’s first comment ever. Seems he hasn’t ever been a person confined to the rules of logic and common sense.
How again does a person get to be a conservative obama supporter?
jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 10:38 PM
Anything religious creeps me out, so yeah.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 10:39 PM
Good question, JIM.
wise_man on September 30, 2008 at 10:39 PM
Yes you can. By doing what Sarah did and refusing to walk into the trap.
That this incredibly petty thing has generated so many comments is astounding.
The left? They got nuthin’.
techno_barbarian on September 30, 2008 at 10:40 PM
I stand by my statement about muyoso. And if he is a /b/-tard, then I hope someone chops his legs off and beats him with the bloody end of them.
/b/-tards were responsible for hacking into Palin’s e-mail.
Sakaki on September 30, 2008 at 10:40 PM
Because I support tax cuts for 90% of Americans.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 10:40 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 Next »