Palin talks gays, feminism, abortion, and evolution with Couric; Update: Video added
posted at 8:33 pm on September 30, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
I waited an hour for CBS to post the video. No luck. I’m uploading my own cut so stand by for that; when their version goes up, I’ll swap it in. In the meantime, here’s the transcript. Remember, the rap on Palin is that she’s supposedly a “Christianist” nut ready to impose theocracy at the first opportunity. Here we learn that she supports contraception; doesn’t want to punish abortion with jail time; supports teaching evolution as “an accepted principle” and may very well oppose teaching creationism (it’s ambiguous); and reaffirms that she doesn’t judge gays, partly because she’s had a close friend who’s gay for decades.
And yet. Read through it and tell me what the media will lead with tomorrow. Here’s a hint: It has nothing to do with her policy answers.
Update: Here’s the vid.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 ... 7 Next »
Chortle!
Bob's Kid on September 30, 2008 at 9:40 PM
Any print source she named would be criticized. As I just posted, Liberal hacks like Aravosis are spinning her comments on the “morning after pill” into a diatribe about “Palin charging residents for Rape Kits” when that law was on the books prior to her assuming office.
Anything will be spun. ANY print, online, or other media outlet explicitly named would have been scrutinized to high heaven. She avoided it.
“Sarah Palin doesn’t READ!” is a stupid meme. She didn’t flagellate herself by dignifying that question. End of story.
If someone wants to believe Palin never reads any news anywhere, then they always were in the Obama tank.
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 9:40 PM
That’s pretty scary actually.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 9:41 PM
When all is said and done, I can’t imagine Katie posing these questions to Osama Obama or Joe “Hair-in-a-Can” Biden.
And Marybel, there’s nothing I enjoy as much as a little cleavage early in the morning….
MrScribbler on September 30, 2008 at 9:41 PM
Facts will not stop the Christian-intolerant/ignorant on the left from making up stuff about Gov. Palin.
Facts don’t work when the other person isn’t interested in them.
Religious_Zealot on September 30, 2008 at 9:42 PM
Dang, you Palin/McCain supporters have your standards set really low for this woman. I guess that is to be expected from people who still support Dubya.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 9:42 PM
Cannot and chooses not to are two different things.
aikidoka on September 30, 2008 at 9:42 PM
I am sorry, but did I seriously just hear this DUMMY say she reads all newspapers and magazines? She dodged the “what do you read to stay informed?” question? Holy Sh&t thursday is going to be a bloodbath. You couldn’t just throw out newsweek, the NYT as well as the drudgereport? That was too hard to do? I want to punch my speakers and monitors. Its like she is worse at improving than Obama.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 9:42 PM
Fnerrrk….
Fortunata on September 30, 2008 at 9:43 PM
No it isn’t.
It shows that Gov. Palin knows how to handle irrelevant gotcha questions.
Religious_Zealot on September 30, 2008 at 9:43 PM
OMG! If you really think that a Governor of a state is so stupid that she’s can’t a name a single newspaper you are naive. She didn’t want to name a newspaper because she knew she was being set up. Please tell me what other candidates get asked about their reading habits. It was an extremely offensive question. I believe she was asked that question because she’s from a small town. That’s it.
terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 9:44 PM
What do you mean by scary?
Amadeus on September 30, 2008 at 9:44 PM
Seriously, if I were a McCain/Palin supporter, I wouldn’t be putting my head in the sand and crying “gotcha journalism,” I would be really worried that my guy’s VP choice is so unworldly that she cannot name a single local or national newspaper.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 9:45 PM
who the fu*k reads any of the above and cares? Trolls under dank little bridges, and people in dentists’ waiting rooms perhaps….
Fortunata on September 30, 2008 at 9:45 PM
Does Obama for America provide you health benefits (including vision and dental) and a 401k for that illustrious $7/hr you’re earning?
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 9:46 PM
Scary that someone running for VP is so unworldly and uninformed that she cannot name a single local, national or international newspaper.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 9:46 PM
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 9:42 PM
Why do you care?
Cindy Munford on September 30, 2008 at 9:46 PM
No it was a dumb and offensive question.
terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 9:46 PM
I live in Chapel Hell, NC and in this county wome who are raped were also charged for their rape kits. And this place is the Berkley of the Southeast. Really, it is the place where old hippies migrate to die.
bloggless on September 30, 2008 at 9:46 PM
One again phil, there is a difference between cannot and will not!
ConservativePartyNow on September 30, 2008 at 9:47 PM
Yeah, Obama sucks at improving! I heard his bathroom remodel was terrible. And the plot of land from Rezo? Pathetic, he made is just a long driveway.
Spirit of 1776 on September 30, 2008 at 9:47 PM
No. She refused to name what sources she personally reads for news. It wasn’t that she couldn’t name a Newspaper. It’s refusal to disclose what she reads, because that would be scrutinized.
But keep earning your $7/hr, courtesy of Obama for America, along with your cubicle-mate, muyoso.
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 9:48 PM
How do you know that it isn’t she chose now to?
aikidoka on September 30, 2008 at 9:48 PM
So really, are some of you guys so dumb that you think Palin is incapable of naming newspapers? You have bought the left’s talking points hook, line and sinker. I feel sorry for you. I could train Paris freaking Hilton to answer that question, “You know, the NYT Washington Post Newsweek blah blah blah.”
NO I’m not saying Palin is dumber than Paris Hilton. I’m saying that you guys are dumb for suggesting she is so stupid that she isn’t smart enough to simply list off newspapers.
Quit freaking out or shut the hell up.
jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 9:48 PM
Please tell me where you get you’re information that she can’t name a single newspaper!!! She did not say that.
terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 9:48 PM
lol
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 9:48 PM
No, guess where those styrofoam columns are going to end up at…!!
Fortunata on September 30, 2008 at 9:48 PM
Can you name one reputable newspaper that Biden reads??!
ConservativePartyNow on September 30, 2008 at 9:48 PM
Guys, seriously. Stop feeding the paid Obama for America trolls.
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 9:50 PM
Funny……….. I was just reading a newspaper and it said:
…… must be true, go figure.
Seven Percent Solution on September 30, 2008 at 9:50 PM
Can we get phil “astroturfing” newkirk banned?
jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 9:50 PM
Anyone ever tell you what a weasally little cocksucker you are?
ManlyRash on September 30, 2008 at 9:50 PM
Um, she was directly asked, what newspapers did you read, prior to being tapped for VP, that helped inform your world view.
She provided a non answer, “all of them.”
When pressed, she could not name a single newspaper.
Checkmate.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 9:50 PM
Up Obama’s rear end. November 4th. Bank it.
Sakaki on September 30, 2008 at 9:51 PM
COURIC: And when it comes to establishing your world view, I was curious, what newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were tapped for this — to stay informed and to understand the world?
PALIN: I’ve read most of them again with a great appreciation for the press, for the media —
COURIC: But what ones specifically? I’m curious.
PALIN: Um, all of them, any of them that have been in front of me over all these years.
COURIC: Can you name any of them?
PALIN: I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 9:51 PM
Actually, if I’d been Palin, I would have said something like, “Hey, if you want to know what I read, why don’t you ask the thirty investigative journalists and lawyers digging through my trash at the dump? I’m sure they can provide you with a list.”
Kat_Mo on September 30, 2008 at 9:52 PM
ANYWAY: to shift the debate away from the paid Obama for America staffers and their astroturfing…
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 9:52 PM
Pity that this isn’t 2004 or even 1996 and a moral values election. Sarah is really a libertarian and normal American who doesn’t judge others. (The ‘rents are much more conservative than I am and mom regularly lunches with a gay couple in her neighborhood)… Damn you JMac for screwing us out of Maggie Thatcher 2.0 in four years.
Illinidiva on September 30, 2008 at 9:52 PM
You can tell when McCain/Palin scores because the trolls come out in force. I noticed that a couple of them who critisized Palin for a non-answer wouldn’t tell what they were reading. Afraid that you will get mocked?
Vince on September 30, 2008 at 9:53 PM
Funny how you are mocking Palin but you have SERIOUS reading comprehension issues. Saying “I get my information from various sources” does not equal “I can’t name a single newspaper.” I guess only in your world it does.
terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 9:54 PM
philnewkirk, why do you presume that all of us McCain/Palin supporters are “conservatives”? Many of us are libertarians.
That’s the beauty of this ticket. It’s brought together both wings of the Right: Libertaian and Conservative.
And with that coalition, the Left is going to have a very hard time defeating us.
ericdondero on September 30, 2008 at 9:54 PM
Must be PTA meetings tomorrow and no school.
Bishop on September 30, 2008 at 9:54 PM
@ lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 9:48 PM
I am not sure what the hell you are talking about, but it seriously doesnt bother you that the person you are supporting can’t name a SINGLE paper or magazine she reads? I am a McCain supporter, reluctantly, and I was VERY excited about Palin. Now though, I have to ask, WTF? I mean, you don’t even have to tell the truth there, but when asked what you read to stay informed, you CANNOT say “Oh, I read everything”. She looks like a DUMMY, and the media will jump on that SO SO fast. Most people are already seeing her as an idiot, and she CERTAINLY isnt helping.
I really can’t believe some of you arent offended she couldnt answer such a simple question, or at least worried that she might not read ANYTHING to stay informed about national issues.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 9:54 PM
Right on, sister. And as a gay man, I appreciate that.
But I disagree with you on “screwing” Palin. She’s gonna be our next Vice President.
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 9:55 PM
…so, she doesn’t kowtow to the Grey Lady and her bastard children? The press isn’t holy enough to memorize. Good for her.
Considering the treatment she’s gotten from the press since she’s been selected, saying that news is important but that news sources are not important enough to remember might’ve been a good reply.
Puritan1648 on September 30, 2008 at 9:55 PM
Hmmmmm…
The Ugly American on September 30, 2008 at 9:56 PM
Can you imagine if she had named one, say the NY Times? The next question would have been, “really, which article in particular did you read last Thurs. morning, Sept. 25th?”
Stop being a douchebag. She didn’t say b/c it wasn’t worth another gotcha go-round. At least she saw that one coming.
JAM on September 30, 2008 at 9:56 PM
Maybe you don’t realize that anything she mentions will be scruntized for it’s content and anything … anything … be will cause for more baseless attacks. She was intentionally vague because of the media’s mission to play “gotcha” or find anything to falsely hammer her with. Who in the hell reads the NYT’s anyway except people that want their views massaged and validated? It’s a trash, treasonous rag.
Lest you still miss my point, unless she named several left leaning magazines and newspapers … she would have been hammered for being “uniformed” because as we all know, the left, in all their stupendous ignorance and self aggrandizing, think only they know anything.
darwin on September 30, 2008 at 9:56 PM
COURIC: Can you name any of them?
Should have been “would you name any of them?”
Bishop on September 30, 2008 at 9:57 PM
Come on. She grew up in a house full of books on Reagan. She’s been consuming the newspaper daily since she was in 3rd grade. Enough of this crap. She’s well read. You are grasping at straws. It’s pathetic.
Spirit of 1776 on September 30, 2008 at 9:57 PM
I’m offended that the question was asked at all. Do you really think if she wasn’t from a small town Katie Couric would have asked that question?
terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 9:57 PM
I think it’s scary that morons like this actually get to vote. I mean how stupid do you have to be to actually believe that a Governor of a state is “unworldly” (whatever that means) and doesn’t read newspapers? And these morons think that “we” are stupid. WOW
MobileVideoEngineer on September 30, 2008 at 9:57 PM
muyoso- you are so naive, or you think we are.
Vince on September 30, 2008 at 9:57 PM
The way it reads to me is that she didn’t want to single out any specific newspapers. She’s being a politician.
jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 9:57 PM
I am sorry, but did I seriously just hear this DUMMY say she reads all newspapers and magazines?
No you didn’t, though I’m sure you did hear the other person running for a VP slot ask a paraplegic man to stand.
Bishop on September 30, 2008 at 9:58 PM
Unworldly is troll-slang for she’s not had an abortion. Has nothing to do with news.
Spirit of 1776 on September 30, 2008 at 9:59 PM
@ terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 9:54 PM
The fact that she couldn’t through out a SINGLE name of a single newspaper or magazine means that either she had a full 2 minute brain fart, she is just a straight dummy, or she doesnt read ANYTHING to stay informed of national issues. I mean, she DODGED a gimme question. Its like asking her, what sorts of guns do you use to hunt moose, and her response being “All of them”. A person who answers like that has NEVER hunted a moose, let alone has even the most basic knowledge of firearms to lie their way through it. Applied back to the newspapers, its a scary thought.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 9:59 PM
@ Bishop on September 30, 2008 at 9:58 PM
No, I am fairly sure I heard both.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 9:59 PM
great great great great interview
unseen on September 30, 2008 at 10:00 PM
She should’ve just said “The New York Times”, then laughed like hell.
Next question, Katie.
The Ugly American on September 30, 2008 at 10:00 PM
@ Vince on September 30, 2008 at 9:57 PM
Well it must be the latter.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 10:00 PM
…so…she isn’t one of those “wet finger in the air” media savvy folks you seem to favor? Too bad. There’s a statist pseudo-messiah running who might answer that question creditably…vote for him.
…which interests you more? That we elect a competent person to an important executive post…or that you and those with whom you share a brain cell win the argument?
I mean that. Is it all about you winning the argument, being right, being able to dance around the campfire singing “We won, we won, we WON!”?
I suspect the latter.
Puritan1648 on September 30, 2008 at 10:01 PM
“I read articles linked from Google News.”
Conservatives bitch the she is supporting liberal Google which is in the tank for Obama.
“I read National Review.”
“Palin gets news from right-wing Obama-smearing magazine.”
“I read ‘Governing’ magazine every month.”
Has to have an instruction book for being Governor.
See how that works, trolls?
rockmom on September 30, 2008 at 10:01 PM
Lol. Since you put it that way. Yeah, it’s exactly right – Palin is unworldly!
Spirit of 1776 on September 30, 2008 at 10:01 PM
Dear phil,
If you are so easily frightened why don’t you run home and get your Mommy to make the bad lady go away? Fear of Sarah Palin and her positions just makes you more paranoid and delusional than 95% of Americans. The sight of an al Qaida beheading ceremony must make your bowels evacuate and the yellow stains in your pants lengthen. I’ll bet your head would explode and you’d cry and whine like a dog while they tape you hogtied as they prepare to separate your head from your neck. Why don’t you go hide under your bed until Sarah actually makes the boogie men go away and then you can come back out and piss all over her like the whiny baby you are?
Subsunk
Subsunk on September 30, 2008 at 10:01 PM
She couldn’t have just named a local Alaska newspaper? Shes only lived in the state practically her entire life. Where would be the embarrassment in just saying that?
Speedwagon82 on September 30, 2008 at 10:01 PM
So you really believe that a Governor of a state has NEVER read a newspaper? Are you serious?
terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 10:01 PM
Isn’t it time for your free-trade coffee break? No breaks allowed at the Obama for America cubicle? Or are they so generous that they let you “work” from home?
The question was not “Name some major American news sources”. It was “What news sources did you read that help shape your worldview?” Any identified source would be scrutinized, be it WSJ, NYT, Wa-Po, a local/state paper, or an online source.
She avoided the question. And that is more than acceptable. I care not for what “news sources” Palin listens to. Her advisors and policy record are of far more salience.
And don’t was poetic to me about being “excited for Sarah Palin” you Obama for America troll.
I AM a PUMA who supported Palin before she was selected. Here’s a link for you:
Me supporting Palin on a liberal State blog. My initial comments on this were troll-rated, and it was prior to Palin’s selection. I said I would vote enthusiastically for a McCain-Palin ticket.
Now quote me such “Palin enthusiasm” from you. Do it.
lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 10:01 PM
@ terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 9:57 PM
ITS A GIMME QUESTION!!! How can you be offended? She is an absolute unknown. Its not like Katie was asking her who the president of Uzbekistan is, she basically asked her, “Name a single newspaper or magazine?”.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 10:01 PM
LOL
Texas Gal on September 30, 2008 at 10:02 PM
@muyoso:
You know what else is scary: someone who, with MINUTES to type an entire comment couldn’t spell the word “throw.”
See how fun exaggeration is? But I’m sure you already knew that.
jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 10:02 PM
muyoso
So supposing she does read HotAir, Drudge and NRO ONLY. What do you think the headline would be tomorrow? She very adeptly avoided the gotcha. Sure it would have been funny if she had said, your show ONLY, but she just got out of it, like every politician by not answering it.
NEXT!
JAM on September 30, 2008 at 10:02 PM
ManlyRash on September 30, 2008 at 9:50 PM
I think Seven Percent Solution sort of mentioned it.
Cindy Munford on September 30, 2008 at 10:02 PM
No, I am fairly sure I heard both.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 9:59 PM
No you didn’t which is why you used the words “fairly sure”.
You definitely heard Biden ask a paraplegic man to stand, you are simply opining on what you thought Palin meant with her answer.
Next.
Bishop on September 30, 2008 at 10:02 PM
It’s easy with 20/20 hindsight to say what the perfect response would have been. Sensing that naming specific national news sources might be a trap, perhaps a good answer would have been:
(Couric demands specificity)
The Monster on September 30, 2008 at 10:03 PM
Why must it be the latter muyoso? Most of us here get it. You don’t so besides being naive you are narcissistic.
Vince on September 30, 2008 at 10:03 PM
Nobody believes it anymore then Andy believes Piper is the real mom.
She’s been reading newspapers daily, politics, not sports, since she was a kid.
Spirit of 1776 on September 30, 2008 at 10:03 PM
You see this is why it was a set up. If she named a local newspaper the MSM would have picked up a copy a local newspaper and say “LOOK! She’s been reading about silly local school events and county fairs! OMG!” They would have mocked her once again.
terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 10:04 PM
If she had mentioned any mainstream publication or website the exchange would have been edited out and we would not even know the question was asked. Haven’t we learned anything from Charlie Gibson?
rockmom on September 30, 2008 at 10:04 PM
Dear muyoso,
Why don’t you and phil hold hands under the bed while you wet yourselves over this. Saves Mommy on the cleanup. Only one place to take care of after the babies get done whining.
Subsunk
Subsunk on September 30, 2008 at 10:04 PM
My, my, my, the trolls are certainly stirred up tonight.
It’s funny that they accuse Gov. Palin of being dumb and ‘unworldly’…
…but they themselves don’t understand the difference between can’t and won’t.
Of course, we all know how rare it is for a politician to avoid a direct gotcha question from the press. /sarc
Religious_Zealot on September 30, 2008 at 10:04 PM
Nope…
http://www.slick.com/wildpics/7hillry.jpg
Calm Before the Storm on September 30, 2008 at 10:04 PM
Sure, that would have been the perfect answer. But the fact that she didn’t give it doesn’t mean she’s mentally challenged. If fumbling over an answer is grounds for disqualification, Obama never would have made it past the primaries.
jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 10:04 PM
Obviously Couric is firing out gotcha questions that she and her other twisted minded liberals love to jump on. The idea of what a person feels about a “morning after pill” is none of Couric’s damn business and it was obvious she was trying to get a hot sound bite. The newspaper question was another blatent liberal ploy. If she read Readers Digest, Saturday Evening Post, McGuffey’s readers (/s) she doesn’t fit the Beltway mold. Clearly if a person doesn’t read the LATimes or the NYT or WaPo you cannot qualify to attend cocktail parties or make decisions that affect an elitist within the Beltway. Some of the rants on this blog scare me but not like they are talking scarey. Too many Obama idiots breathing air, eating food and taking up space that responsible people on the earth need!
wepeople on September 30, 2008 at 10:05 PM
She was asked to specifically name a newspaper. She couldn’t. Can you name one?
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 10:05 PM
That was by far her best interview. She seamed by far more comfortable
KBird on September 30, 2008 at 10:05 PM
Phil, your boss called to tell you that your astroturfing has become too obvious and he wants you to stop.
carbon_footprint on September 30, 2008 at 10:06 PM
…true…good catch….
…that’s the way you ask a question of a junior clerk looking for a promotion to team leader…it’s rather condescending…but, that’s our Katie!
Why ask such a qustion like that unless you’re trying to establish what you yourself believe is the respondent’s non-answer. You’re sure she’s a lightweight and you want to prove it. That’ll get you kudos among the cocktail party set you travel with, but it’s damned dishonest journalism, Katie my dear….
Puritan1648 on September 30, 2008 at 10:06 PM
I can’t imagine that she doesn’t get a daily ‘clip sheet” put together by her press secretary. But she may not have read one of those for a while.
What Couric was looking for was what she reads that shapes her world view. I.e., what kind of Christianist Bible-thumping right-wing rags does she read? Good for her for picking it up and refusing to answer.
rockmom on September 30, 2008 at 10:07 PM
@ lansing quaker on September 30, 2008 at 10:01 PM
So YOU, who comments on a liberal state blog, is calling me, a person who comments on here for several years, an Obama supporter? Go back and read my comments. I am not going to seach out my own comments to some random on a blog who is convinced that ANYONE who criticized the ticket is working for the opposition.
The appropriate answer for ANY politician would be, I read a variety of newspapers from the NYT to the Washington Times. I like to get both sides of issues, because no one side is infallible. DONE. PERFECT ANSWER. How hard was that?
You seem to know a lot about this Obama for America thing, something which I have never heard of before your obvious trolling.
P.S. I love your brand of Oats.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 10:07 PM
Do Alaska newspapers not carry national news reports or national business news? It would be a retarded argument.
Speedwagon82 on September 30, 2008 at 10:07 PM
terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 10:04 PM
Yeppers, it was one of those dumb questions meant to launch Couric’s next set of gotcha hits, no matter what Palin said.
Bishop on September 30, 2008 at 10:07 PM
Of course I can. I have a M.A. in Journalism, you idiot.
terryannonline on September 30, 2008 at 10:08 PM
What difference would it make to you. You have already made up your mind that since she is not a mind numb liberal robot that you don’t like her. Personally phil, I think you are being sexist
ConservativePartyNow on September 30, 2008 at 10:08 PM
@ Subsunk on September 30, 2008 at 10:04 PM
Watch ANY news channel tomorrow. This will be all over it.
muyoso on September 30, 2008 at 10:08 PM
DID SHE EVER SAY, “I’m sorry, I just lied to you, I’ve never read or looked at or even heard the names of newspapers for my entire backwoods, incest-filled, country bumpkin, moose-hunting life. Remind me again, what’s a newspaper?”
NO?
Then move the hell on. She refused to name a paper, that doesn’t mean she’s incapable of doing so.
jimmy the notable on September 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM
WHO CARES????!!!!! For crying out loud, people. If she’d answered anything other than the NY Slimes or WaPo, she’d be crucified. I’d say Palin is twice as smart as some of the people here.
Connie on September 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM
It’s possible that she is unworldly. Anyone who cannot name a newspaper is obviously not someone who reads newspapers. That to me shows an insulated worldview and certainly not a worldly one.
philnewkirk on September 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM
Reading newspapers to stay informed?
That’s making me chuckle a little.
Next thing you know, taking European vacations and the act of campaigning for President will both be considered top qualifications tobe President.
forest on September 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM
Hey Phil, take a break. You don’t have to be a prick every day of your life!
Yeah, I stole it from Platoon.
Here’s my favorite paper. It’s called the Daily Shut Your Piehole.
hawkdriver on September 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 ... 7 Next »