Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Bailout deal reached; Update: ACORN, other pork removed

posted at 10:24 am on September 28, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | regular view

Negotiators on Capitol Hill finally reached an agreement on a sweeping bailout of the financial sector by the Treasury early this morning, attempting to head off bank runs and panics around the world when the Asian markets open tonight.  The plan includes options for asset insurance that House Republicans demanded, as well as broad accountability for actions taken by Treasury in purchasing assets.  The deal also allows a wider group of banks to rid themselves of the toxic assets, created in large part by Congress over the last ten years:

A summary of the tentative agreement released by Ms. Pelosi’s office said the plan “gives taxpayers an ownership stake and profit-making opportunities with participating companies; puts taxpayers first in line to recover assets if a participating company fails; (and) guarantees taxpayers are repaid in full — if other protections have not actually produced a profit.” (See Ms. Pelosi’s summary.)

Additionally, the summary said the legislation will expand the range of firms that can sell troubled assets to the government to include pension plans, local governments and community banks serving “low- and middle-income families.” …

The summary issued by Ms. Pelosi’s office said the legislation will include provisions giving Treasury the ability to work with cash-strapped homeowners whose mortgages are purchased by the federal government to refinance into a more affordable mortgage. Other foreclosure-prevention measures included in the agreement are an extension of the tax holiday for homeowners who face foreclosure, as well as a tax break for community banks who held shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The rescue plan will allow affected banks to take an immediate tax deduction on losses from investments in the two firms, which were taken over by the federal government earlier this month.

Lawmakers also included provisions allowing them to keep a close eye on the Treasury program, including a bipartisan oversight board appointed by members of both parties in Congress, an inspector general to monitor Treasury decisions, and regular audits from the Government Accountability Office. Additionally, Treasury will be required to make transactions made through the troubled asset program available publicly online. Unlike the original Treasury proposal, which would have given the department legal immunity in the program, the tentative agreement reached late Saturday allows for judicial review of Treasury decisions.

This looks like the rare occasion when Congress manages to improve an idea.  The original Paulson plan would have imposed immunity from legal action on any moves made by the Treasury, exactly the wrong direction for a crisis already caused by unchecked government manipulation.  In the new plan, Treasury officials have accountability for their management of the $700 billion plan.

The new agreement may have made the plan larger, but the politics of this probably required it.  In the original Paulson plan, the bailout focused solely on the institutions choking on the government-mandated Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) and credit swaps based on them.  Congress broadened this to give more direct relief to homeowners facing foreclosure and eviction.  While more painful in the short run, it will probably make the economy more stable in the long run, and give the securities the Treasury buys more value, as foreclosures are a severe loss for the lenders.  If we can keep people in the homes and help them to pay back the mortgages, we may not lose much money at all over the next 25 years.

Some will complain that this will bail out foreign institutions as well as American banks.  That is the result of the government’s creation and sale of MBSs as investment products to people around the world.  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac sold MBSs to anyone who would buy them, and both Americans and foreigners bought them with the implicit backing of the US government.  Congress made that grave error in the 1990s and created an entire class of junk bonds worse than anything seen in the 1980s, although with some handholding, we may get to see value out of them yet.

This will still be a painful lesson for us about government manipulation of markets.  We will have to tighten belts and cut spending to pay for the initial outlay from this bailout, and we still have another financial crisis coming on entitlements to resolve.  However, this agreement — as painful as it is — will probably make the difference between a recession and a global collapse.  Those of us with market assets will almost certainly not have to worry about Monday, and the possibility of watching them get wiped them out in a panic.

After this, we need to demand humility from Congress on economic policy.  Government-imposed “fairness” led to this catastrophe, and we’ll pay the price for the Community Reinvestment Act and the manipulations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for a generation.  Had we allowed the market to work normally, this never would have happened.

Update: The funding of the Housing Trust Fund, the slush fund that feeds ACORN and La Raza, is out.  You can thank House Republicans for enough obstructionism to get that result.  Other changes made to the final version of the bailout, according to a source on the Hill, were the removal of several provisions:

  • Provision to provide unions and other activist groups with proxy access for corporate boards
  • Provision to mandate shareholder votes on compensation issues (union priority)
  • Diversion of funds into a housing fund to support left-wing activist groups like ACORN
  • A provision to allow trial judges to arbitrarily adjust mortgages, creating bonanza for trial lawyers
  • A provision to require the government to sell to state and local governments at a discount homes the government acquires as a result of foreclosure

It also suspends mark-to-market rules and requires a study on their effects on the collapse.

Update II: Just to clarify, the bullet points are items removed from the plan.  Sorry; it was very unclear.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 5

I still think a good plan would have been for us little folk to be able to buy back our mortgages for 2cents on the dollar, like JPMorgan did with WaMu (with the aid of our Government, of course). I know — it takes money to make money, but that was ridiculous!

unclesmrgol on September 28, 2008 at 10:29 AM

Expensive in ways that we haven’t even imagined yet. Necessary? The question is to whom, specifically and why? It’s the perfect politician’s ploy. Set up the citizenry with leading presumptions centered around fear and panic, then act as if you are saving the day. Opiate for the masses and all that.

Fletch54 on September 28, 2008 at 10:31 AM

Anyone heard Mitt Romneys take on all of this?

BallisticBob on September 28, 2008 at 10:31 AM

I’d like to read the bill, will it be posted on the net before a vote is taken?

digitalintrigue on September 28, 2008 at 10:32 AM

Congratulations go out to our “new direction” congress that has managed to put their collective fingers in the whole of dam while the sides are falling in around them. While the politicians can now go home, (and attempt to explain how this bailout is a “good thing” for middle America), regular working taxpayers have to be scratching their heads over what just occurred. Two weeks ago Pelosi and Reid “took a pass”, (failed on a fourth and one for you football fans), on passing any energy legislation that could have opened up a resurgence of an industry that has been buried in environmental and special interest litigation for thirty years. Seventy percent of the folks in this nation were in favor of opening up offshore drilling and the “all of the above” inclusion of alternative energy ideas to get us off of the 700 billion a year dependence on foreign supply. Where was the outrage in the mainstream media? They were too busy wondering if Sarah Palin is not elite enough to fit their warped view of a new socialist America. With the prices at the gas pumps still sucking the hard earned dollars out of our pocket books, our government, (yes, from Bush all the way down to the last staff member in both houses) shoves another 700 billion dollar tax bill down the throats of the electorate. And now they’re coming home to ask for your vote. The “restructuring” of the financial markets should be preceded by an over-all restructuring of the mentality in Washington that has returned us to the welfare status of the Carter years. And to think it only took two years of Democrat control to get us into a condition of relying on the government for our every need. (Conservatives also have contributed to this run-away spending in the name of social equality that has put the fiscal burden on the backs of the taxpayers.) When does it end? Maybe a financial breakdown on Wall Street would be a healthy way for all of these big spenders to get back to where they can live within the means of real capital without the governments “extension of credit” / BAILOUT. When your legislators come home, let them know that you’re not very proud of any “accomplishments” they plan to brag about——there aren’t any.

Rovin on September 28, 2008 at 10:32 AM

I don’t notice any mention of Freddie and Fannie — the initial two dominoes! The Government has seized them, but their enabling legislation is still in place and, like Count Dracula, might they still rise from their coffins to again suck our life out?

unclesmrgol on September 28, 2008 at 10:33 AM

Does the plan include an option for the public to frog-march 80% of the politicians right into Gitmo?

Dodd and Franks are toasting themselves as we speak. Aholes.

Bishop on September 28, 2008 at 10:34 AM

Thank God for the democrat party and Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Without them this nation would have been insolvent and economic calamity would have been a certainty.

I am so grateful that Speaker Pelosi will permit me to remain in my home without fear of foreclosure by greedy wall street investment banks.

I am changing my party allegiance Monday, and will be supporting Barack Obama for president.

Thank the democrat party, the party of the middle class, and thank God for Nancy Pelosi.

/I genuflect before Ms Speaker.

rockhauler on September 28, 2008 at 10:34 AM

as well as broad accountability for actions taken by
Treasury in purchasing assets.

How about broad accountability for actions of Dodd, Gorelick, Frank, etc…?

HornetSting on September 28, 2008 at 10:35 AM

“After this, we need to demand humility from Congress on economic policy. Government-imposed “fairness” led to this catastrophe, and we’ll pay the price for the Community Reinvestment Act and the manipulations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for a generation. Had we allowed the market to work normally, this never would have happened.”

We also need an objective investigation into how and why it happened. We need accountability, including fines and prison sentences. We need names, dates, places. We need apologies from individuals, companies and parties. We need the media to report it fairly, without saying it was simply “greed.” We need to make sure it never happens again.

Star20 on September 28, 2008 at 10:35 AM

I still think a good plan would have been for us little folk to be able to buy back our mortgages for 2cents on the dollar, like JPMorgan did with WaMu (with the aid of our Government, of course). I know — it takes money to make money, but that was ridiculous!

unclesmrgol on September 28, 2008 at 10:29 AM

There will be thousands of ridiculous examples like this to make. Imagine you are were a shareholder in Lehman or WaMu and you lost every dime a day before the bailout would have made you whole. You’ve just made thousands of lifelong enemies who will hold a grudge against the gov’t forever.

JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 10:36 AM

My wallet started screaming after reading this, I was forced to put a bullet into it so end the suffering.

-plays TAPS-

Bishop on September 28, 2008 at 10:36 AM

How does this fix the problem? Many people bought overpriced homes w/ no money down. Why make payments on an asset that is losing value daily? Why not just default and let the government have it? How many of these homes are really ’single family homes’ as opposed to rental properties? A friend of mine has bought 5 homes to rent out. Guess which ones he defaults on if the sh*t hits the fan? Why should the taxpayer subsidize his rental properties?

I think this deal ’saves’ Wall Street and delays the needed price corrections on Main Street.

Oh yea, Repeal CRA and fire Dodd, Frank, Schumer etc….

Partisan on September 28, 2008 at 10:37 AM

This will still be a painful lesson for us about government manipulation of markets. We will have to tighten belts and cut spending to pay for the initial outlay from this bailout, and we still have another financial crisis coming on entitlements to resolve.

No lesson will be learned about the government creating chaos in the markets. There is zero chance of tightening belts or cutting spending with this congress. None whatsoever.

Pavel on September 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM

Are we sure that the ACORN provisions were stripped out?

Wine_N_Dine on September 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM

like Count Dracula, might they still rise from their coffins to again suck our life out? – unclesmrgol on September 28, 2008 at 10:33 AM

Yes. Next question.

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 10:39 AM

So the guy who was shrieking that he wouldn’t phone it in actually was the guy who phoned it in.

Dave Rywall on September 28, 2008 at 10:40 AM

Some will complain that this will bail out foreign institutions as well as American banks. That is the result of the government’s creation and sale of MBSs as investment products to people around the world. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac sold MBSs to anyone who would buy them, and both Americans and foreigners bought them with the implicit backing of the US government.

Don’t think anyone should underestimate the threat the Chinese made to our economy demanding these mortgages they own be made good. Isn’t there any lesson to be learned from that??

Also, how do we finance the money used in the bailout??

Are we expecting the Chinese to buy even more treasuries to give us the actual cash that the gov’t will pay out?

Where does this money come from?

JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 10:41 AM

Does the plan include an option for the public to frog-march 80% of the politicians right into Gitmo?-Bishop on September 28, 2008 at 10:34 AM

No. In fact, these esteemed legislators and statesmen will be hailed as heroes who saved the republic and will profit even further. Both will die peaceful, quiet deaths in bed surrounded by loved ones. The Republicans? No so much.

Next question.

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 10:41 AM

By “taxpayers”, I assume that actually is all of the people who pay zero Federal Income Tax and just a little FICA and who get “tax credits” – aka yearly welfare handouts – from the real taxpayers.
What qualifies these people as “taxpayers”, if they pay no taxes into the general revenue that is used to pay for this?

Why not just return the money DIRECTLY to the 2008 Federal Income Taxpayers (or their heirs) in proportion to their actual 2008 payments?
THEN I would believe these motherless socialist bastards..

TexasJew on September 28, 2008 at 10:42 AM

Don’t think anyone should underestimate the threat the Chinese made to our economy demanding these mortgages they own be made good. Isn’t there any lesson to be learned from that??

Yes, but no one in charge of the government will profit from the education.

Also, how do we finance the money used in the bailout??

More bucks from the Chinese – and from future generations of Americans.

Are we expecting the Chinese to buy even more treasuries to give us the actual cash that the gov’t will pay out?

Yes.

Where does this money come from?

Someone else. It always does.

Any more questions?

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 10:44 AM

Did they repeal the CRA?

Or are we going to do this again in five years?

PattyJ on September 28, 2008 at 10:44 AM

I want to read the bill . . . I believe nothing those dolts say. Frankly, I think we had all better steel ourselves because we are about to have a white hot poker inserted deep into our rectums.

rplat on September 28, 2008 at 10:46 AM

What qualifies these people as “taxpayers”, if they pay no taxes into the general revenue that is used to pay for this?

The government says they are.

Why not just return the money DIRECTLY to the 2008 Federal Income Taxpayers (or their heirs) in proportion to their actual 2008 payments?

Because that money does not belong to you…it belongs to the government.

Any more questions?

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 10:47 AM

Did they repeal the CRA?

Or are we going to do this again in five years?

PattyJ on September 28, 2008 at 10:44 AM

Five years?
Try five months…

TexasJew on September 28, 2008 at 10:47 AM

It’s been universally reported that ACORN is out.

I’m confident that Boehner et. al. have made it absolutely clear that their votes are contingent on no ACORN and no drilling constraints.

So mccain and palin need to make sure that bambi and gaffy dont succeed in stealing credit during the debates … bambi will have to wait for the last one since his next is a townhall but look for him putting it into his summary of the final debate when there is no opportunity to rebut … that’s his style

gh on September 28, 2008 at 10:48 AM

As I said in a previous thread:

It was reported yesterday that the congress received more calls on this bailout than even the amnesty bill debacle.

We need to again flood their offices with calls, faxes, emails that we want Dodd, Frank, Gorelick held accountable for their hand in this mess. Jam the phonelines, shut it down. This is our money, dammit, heads need to roll.

HornetSting on September 28, 2008 at 10:48 AM

Alright, this is checked off the list.

Next up: Medicare.

Then social security.

Aw hell, let’s just get it over with: merge with Russia and China and become a communist super-state, then rule the world.

Bishop on September 28, 2008 at 10:49 AM

Other changes made to the final version of the bailout, according to a source on the Hill:
Provision to provide unions and other activist groups with proxy access for corporate boards
Provision to mandate shareholder votes on compensation issues (union priority)
Diversion of funds into a housing fund to support left-wing activist groups like ACORN
A provision to allow trial judges to arbitrarily adjust mortgages, creating bonanza for trial lawyers
A provision to require the government to sell to state and local governments at a discount homes the government acquires as a result of foreclosure

I know this is probably a stupid question, but were these things (above) taken out of the bill?

IrishEi on September 28, 2008 at 10:49 AM

Did they repeal the CRA?

Not sure at this point. As a graduate of the Allahpundit Institute of Advanced Pessimistic Analysis, my educated guess is that CRA is on a backburner and will be revived when we the people are no longer paying attention.

Or are we going to do this again in five years?

Next question.

Yes. We will be doing this again in 5 years.

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 10:49 AM

“The private sector got us into this mess.”

Big. Brass. Balls.

BallisticBob on September 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM

Did they repeal the CRA?

Or are we going to do this again in five years?

PattyJ on September 28, 2008 at 10:44 AM

Oh hell no, the donk piggybank is “for the people”.

It sort of reminds me of a Borderline Personality Disorder suffering child who likes the toothfairy so much he happily knocks his permanenet teeth out with a pipe wrench…….at the age of 35.

sven10077 on September 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM

And all the communist organizers in America just gave each other a wink and a nod. It won’t be much longer now comrades.

genso on September 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM

Provision to provide unions and other activist groups with proxy access for corporate boards

Snuck this one past, didn’t they?

So the guy who was shrieking that he wouldn’t phone it in actually was the guy who phoned it in.

Dave Rywall on September 28, 2008 at 10:40 AM

You must have missed the part where he gave the House pubbies an actual voice in what was going on. If he had been all over the news while this was in progress, you would have accused him of doing it for political purposes. It must be awful to be Canadian and be so envious of another country.

a capella on September 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM

I think the whole ACORN/union thing was a feint, to allow the Dims to push through a bill with zero taxpayer benefits, such any attempt to lower or eliminate the Capital Gains tax.

I still hope that the 100+ conservative stalwarts in the House vote against this thing..

TexasJew on September 28, 2008 at 10:52 AM

Any more questions?

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 10:44 AM

A country can lose its freedom of action through financial mismanagement. Our ability to confront China when the occasion arises is compromised. Part of the lesson learned here is whether or not the US ought to continue to be a debtor nation beholden to the goodwill of foreigners for its economic health.

JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM

Dave Rywall on September 28, 2008 at 10:40 AM

Did someone fart in here?

HornetSting on September 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM

I’m sorry, I misspelled “community” in my earlier post.

genso on September 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM

I have seen nothing that gives any indication that Congress will address using the failure of using the mortgage industry as a de-facto welfare program. This legislation is designed to save the present system and does nothing to fix the problem.

Once the system is saved, Congress will see no need to address its failure.

Stephen Macklin on September 28, 2008 at 10:54 AM

Some nice tidbits to send you to the liquor cabinet:

* No salary caps for executives of firms that take taxpayer money.

* Vague language around taxpayers getting equity; my guess is that many firms would get taxpayer money without giving up equity.

* Automatic additional funding unless blocked by a super-majority. If this is a bipartisan solution, why not require affirmative Congressional action for additional funds?

Bishop on September 28, 2008 at 10:54 AM

Uh huh, and monkeys are going to fly out my……

HornetSting on September 28, 2008 at 10:54 AM

I’m sorry, I misspelled “community” in my earlier post.

genso on September 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM

Not to worry genso; the Grammar Police only go after trolls.

IrishEi on September 28, 2008 at 10:55 AM

As they say the devil is in the details… Maybe in the dark of night, ACORN changed its name.

Dasher on September 28, 2008 at 10:55 AM

Ed, for clarity, the update should reflect that those things were stripped from the previous version of the bill.

Pablo on September 28, 2008 at 10:55 AM

Oh sh*t.

By roughly 11:30 p.m., what Reid described as a “breakthrough” came in the form of an idea from Pelosi that was enough to advance talks.

Oh well, it’s not bambi and it’s in-print.

gh on September 28, 2008 at 10:55 AM

This legislation is designed to save the present system and does nothing to fix the problem.

Once the system is saved, Congress will see no need to address its failure.

Stephen Macklin on September 28, 2008 at 10:54 AM

You can’t have the same system without a Fannie/Freddie to gtee any and all paper.

Who runs Fannie now? What’s it’s mandate?

JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 10:56 AM

I feel PORKED!

HornetSting on September 28, 2008 at 10:56 AM

Where does this money come from?

JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 10:41 AM

Don’t you hear that whirring sound coming from Treasury? That’s them firing up the presses…

Get ready for inflation like we haven’t seen since 1980. With the minimum wage slated to increase to $6.55 next summer and ever increasing energy costs, it’s going to get ugly.

mojojojo on September 28, 2008 at 10:56 AM

Pablo on September 28, 2008 at 10:55 AM

Is that true, Pablo? (See my 10:49 AM)

IrishEi on September 28, 2008 at 10:57 AM

I suppose we should be chearing now that the massive govt bailout is on the verge of passage.

Still, the Witch did call House (R)s “unpatriotic”.

CliffHanger on September 28, 2008 at 10:57 AM

This will still be a painful lesson for us about government manipulation of markets. We will have to tighten belts and cut spending raise taxes to pay for the initial outlay from this bailout, and we still have another financial crisis coming on entitlements to resolve.

Fixed. Did you forget who was in charge of Congress, Ed?

fossten on September 28, 2008 at 10:57 AM

My takeaway from this whole thing. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Chris Dodd standing behind the lecterns and the microphones earlier this week and lying to my face. Everybody seems to have forgotten that they stood up there and said we have a deal when they had nothing. The Dems politicized the hell out of this while trying to protect their biggest campaign donors.
It wasn’t nuance, it wasn’t political doublespeak, they out and out lied to me and the American public.
Why should I believe anything they say? Why should I put my confidence in them for anything?
They lied and they should be ashamed, since tar and feathering is out of favor nowadays.
Kudos to the House Republicans who stood up to them and BIG kudos to Sen McCain who provided the impetus to make the whole sham non deal public.
The media and the Dems will continue to spin this as the Republicans fault, nothing new there since Dems never take responsibility for anything, but it is the House Republicans that the average American owes a big thank you to for preventing what was a bad situation, from getting worse.
No, I ain’t happy, but let’s see how the accountability side of this works out, and since the FBI is currently investigating 26 financial institutions right now maybe that will become a reality.

Just A Grunt on September 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM

The Headline Update does say “Other Pork Removed” so I think we can assume that those bulleted items in the post have been removed from the bill.

CliffHanger on September 28, 2008 at 11:00 AM

This is not the first time we have been sold out to socialism. But, with an Obama victory, this will mark the beginning of the end of our way of life. Just going on record here.

genso on September 28, 2008 at 11:00 AM

ED sorry for the OT, but just read this comment at ace, and it relates to a post of yours yesterday:

“Truth Squad.”

Remember the bracelet that Obama wore at the debate?

Turns out the parents of the fallen soldier have asked him to stop wearing it, but he’s pretty much telling them to go pound sand.

http://tinyurl.com/4×6hjr

‘Cause he’s the Messiah, and Sergeant Ryan David Jopek is just some dude who’s more useful dead than alive.

If the blogosphere lets Obama get away with this one, we deserve him as out president.

Spread it around.

funky chicken on September 28, 2008 at 11:02 AM

If we can keep people in the homes and help them to pay back the mortgages, we may not lose much money at all over the next 25 years.

Ed, that is simply stupid. That is the same argument that New York City makes in still allowing Rent Control to deform the housing market up there.
People who should not have ever had gotten possession of a house, where welfare payments are counted as income, or illegal immigrants who rent out their houses to other illegals as an under-the-counter business venture, should not be helped by taxpoayers anymore. They’ll be living in taxpayer subsidized housing forever.

What is not being discussed here is how the average decent homeowner will be paying higher mortgage payments for decades to keep this scam going..

TexasJew on September 28, 2008 at 11:02 AM

Went to Newsvine…a MSN outcrop, and most of the people are blaming Bush, (surprise), and whining about “bailing out Wall Street and those fat cats.” MSNBC talking points.

They are, of course, blaming Repubs..only a few mentions of Dodd and Frank….

And they are selling the youtube video about the POW that pisses on McCain.

We need Boehner, Shelby, Blunt and any other articulate, hard hitting Repub to go out and blitz the media on the REAL REASON FOR THIS DEBACLE!

Hide Sen Gregg…I don’t he has a backbone.

HornetSting on September 28, 2008 at 11:02 AM

Get ready for inflation like we haven’t seen since 1980. With the minimum wage slated to increase to $6.55 next summer and ever increasing energy costs, it’s going to get ugly.

mojojojo on September 28, 2008 at 10:56 AM

That’s exactly what I’m talking about. I haven’t seen anyone addressing the effect on prices by pumping this amt. of money into the economy, or the potential for big dollar depreciation–especially in energy costs as you say. This may cause more and more people abroad to abandon the dollar, even putting its position as the global reserve currency in jeopardy.

Maybe I’m wrong and isn’t as big a problem as I think, but I haven’t seen a discussion of this. Personally, I am less inclined to hold dollars and dollar denominated assets (Am. stocks and bonds) because of this. Won’t others react the same?

JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 11:02 AM

I don’t know about any of you, but anything that makes Harry Reid smile makes me very nervous.

pilamaye on September 28, 2008 at 11:02 AM

Acorn stuff and the rest of the earmarks were just distractions. Window dressing to distract the public that $700B is spent to clear the toxic debt, but the sink is not fixed. Bailout without reform. That was the goal and it was achieved.

Angry Dumbo on September 28, 2008 at 11:05 AM

Keep those cards and letters coming, folks.

Repeal the CRA, Now.

Don’t they get it? The people are really angry–bailouts, shamnesty…their cushy jobs are on the line for real. We are not going away this time.

PattyJ on September 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM

What is not being discussed here is how the average decent homeowner will be paying higher mortgage payments for decades to keep this scam going. – TexasJew on September 28, 2008 at 11:02 AM

It’s pretty much understood, Texas – no point in discussing it, as we’ll only make ourselves sick.

What frightens me is that my prognosis of apocalypse for this republic may very well come to pass.

More terrifying than that is the fact that – God help me – I’m actually looking forward to it.

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 11:09 AM

The media and the Dems will continue to spin this as the Republicans fault, nothing new there since Dems never take responsibility for anything, but it is the House Republicans that the average American owes a big thank you to for preventing what was a bad situation, from getting worse.
No, I ain’t happy, but let’s see how the accountability side of this works out, and since the FBI is currently investigating 26 financial institutions right now maybe that will become a reality.

Just A Grunt on September 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM

And thank John McCain for making sure those house republicans got to the table….Bush, Paulson, Pelosi, and Reid sure weren’t putting them there as of last week.

The other joke? Remember all the stupid Reid and Schumer “John McCain needs to get out of town–he ruined our perfect bill and now the world will end” statements? eyeroll

funky chicken on September 28, 2008 at 11:10 AM

I know this is probably a stupid question, but were these things (above) taken out of the bill?

IrishEi on September 28, 2008 at 10:49 AM

I surely hope so.

neuquenguy on September 28, 2008 at 11:12 AM

What frightens me is that my prognosis of apocalypse for this republic may very well come to pass.

More terrifying than that is the fact that – God help me – I’m actually looking forward to it.

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 11:09 AM

I couldn’t agree more. Sad though it is, it has to happen. There is no way our system of government can recapture its true nature without a collapse.

genso on September 28, 2008 at 11:12 AM

Waiting for the boys over at Heritage to give us their take.

Weight of Glory on September 28, 2008 at 11:12 AM

Bailout without reform.

Does anyone know what Fannie’s role is now, or will be? Is it being restructured? shuttered? what?

No longer will banks write any kind of mortgage for any borrower if they can’t offload it to Fannie.

If the problem began there, so perhaps does a future solution.

JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 11:13 AM

This is going to fix nothing, except the market opening on Monday. It’s just a bandaid, and not even a pretty “Hello Kitty” one..

Makes ya kinda proud, seeing how the elected govt. has so effectively destroyed both our Constitution and free-market economy in just a few short days.

TexasJew on September 28, 2008 at 11:14 AM

The funding of the Housing Trust Fund, the slush fund that feeds ACORN and La Raza, is out. You can thank House Republicans for enough obstructionism to get that result.

I’m very relieved to read this. I planned to contact Boehner and every other Republican I could early tomorrow about this now-removed funding.

While I’m on this issue, however, I’d like to express to what degree I believe that Congress must stop funding both these organizations and investigate the behaviors of both, also.

Also, I think that the country would be immensely well served if Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, particularly (next would be Schumer) were dismissed and various penalties applied to any/all of them…these individuals have not only failed to perform well in our Congress, it looks very likely that they’ve abused our nation, demonstratively so.

S on September 28, 2008 at 11:14 AM

What frightens me is that my prognosis of apocalypse for this republic may very well come to pass.

More terrifying than that is the fact that – God help me – I’m actually looking forward to it.

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 11:09 AM

I couldn’t agree more. Sad though it is, it has to happen. There is no way our system of government can recapture its true nature without a collapse.

genso on September 28, 2008 at 11:12 AM

Once you are on a steep slippery slope it is not easy to reverse direction, some major discontinuity is usually necessary.

neuquenguy on September 28, 2008 at 11:15 AM

House Republicans have still not signed off! A few phone calls may be in order.

huckleberryfriend on September 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM

From Fannie’s website:

News Release

September 19, 2008

Fannie Mae Announces Organizational Changes

WASHINGTON DC — Fannie Mae (FNM/NYSE) today announced that the company is realigning its organizational structure, effective immediately, as the company continues to serve the housing finance system and help to stabilize the market.

Fannie Mae’s three lines of business — Single-Family Mortgage Guaranty, Capital Markets, and Housing and Community Development — and their leadership — will report directly to the President and Chief Executive Officer, Herbert M. Allison, Jr. Technology and Operations will report to Chief Operating Officer Michael Williams. The structure and function of Government and Industry Relations is under review.

Allison also said that he would continue to review Fannie Mae’s organizational structure to make needed changes. “Fannie Mae is building a new organizational structure as we take the company in a new direction to serve a dramatically changing market,” Allison said. “The company’s organization will be flatter, with clear lines of authority and strong checks and balances, and a closer link between our businesses and top management. Above all, we will embrace and make needed changes so we can better help to stabilize and serve the market ahead.”

Fannie Mae Resource Center Telephone 1-800-7FANNIE
(1-800-732-6643)

JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM

More terrifying than that is the fact that – God help me – I’m actually looking forward to it.

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 11:09 AM

Yeah.. remember how here at HA we just used to get all worked up over evolution vs. ID or how big a RINO McCain was?
Those were the days!

TexasJew on September 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM

McCotter (R-MI) on FOX now.

Awesome.

IrishEi on September 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM

And thank John McCain for making sure those house republicans got to the table….Bush, Paulson, Pelosi, and Reid sure weren’t putting them there as of last week.

The other joke? Remember all the stupid Reid and Schumer “John McCain needs to get out of town–he ruined our perfect bill and now the world will end” statements? eyeroll

funky chicken on September 28, 2008 at 11:10 AM

I wish he would come out and tell everyone what he did, sitting next to Boehner, Blunt, and Gregg, who were there or in contact with those involved.

Chicken, I think you misunderstood me last night. McCain was not my first choice for president, but after the debate, I feel better about our candidate. I just wish he would fight back, like our congress, against nasty Dem remarks.

BTW, I think you gave me somanella last night. Thanks.
Don’t eat funky chicken, Grue.

HornetSting on September 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM

While I’m on this issue, however, I’d like to express to what degree I believe that Congress must stop funding both these organizations and investigate the behaviors of both, also.

That won’t happen in an Obama administration. The only hope of stopping the slide into socialism is to elect McCain. Sadly, even that may not be enough.

genso on September 28, 2008 at 11:17 AM

Sage advice from another site:

There is a bill in the house. There is not one in the Senate so we need to create as much doubt as we can, as soon as we can.

Do they have the votes? That is another story. They won’t if we can scare every junior member in the house, or appeal to the right few in the Senate.

Bishop on September 28, 2008 at 11:17 AM

McCotter says House Republicans will NOT back this new bill.

IrishEi on September 28, 2008 at 11:18 AM

I’m very relieved to read this. I planned to contact Boehner and every other Republican I could early tomorrow about this now-removed funding.

Don’t stop now…Call them and DEMAND that Frank, Dodd, Gorelick are held accountable….JAIL AND RESIGNATION!

HornetSting on September 28, 2008 at 11:18 AM

Republicans must make much over the pork chopping they did esp ACORN and LaRaza. This plays in to the campaign theme.

OT: I just read the NTPost articel about Palin’s clothes. They called Michelle sophisticated and talked about Hillary’s powerful pantsuits. WHat planet are these people on?

clnurnberg on September 28, 2008 at 11:20 AM

Last Thursday’s testimony to Congress by head of Fannie about it’s current mission/objectives.

It’s a pdf file. Don’t know how to cut and paste relevant parts here. sorry.

JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 11:20 AM

Timestamp the Updates! Please!

geckomon on September 28, 2008 at 11:20 AM

“The company’s organization will be flatter, with clear lines of authority and strong checks and balances, and a closer link between our businesses and top management. Above all, we will embrace and make needed changes so we can better help to stabilize and serve the market ahead.”

Fannie Mae
JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM

Fannie, how about shooting yourself in the freaking head and dying? Oh, and put one through your friend Freddie’s while you’re at it.
THAT’S the kind of stabilization we would like to see!
The flatline kind..

TexasJew on September 28, 2008 at 11:20 AM

Provision to provide unions and other activist groups with proxy access for corporate boards
Provision to mandate shareholder votes on compensation issues (union priority)
Diversion of funds into a housing fund to support left-wing activist groups like ACORN
A provision to allow trial judges to arbitrarily adjust mortgages, creating bonanza for trial lawyers
A provision to require the government to sell to state and local governments at a discount homes the government acquires as a result of foreclosure

Are these provisions in or out?

annexwcp on September 28, 2008 at 11:22 AM

OT: I just read the NTPost articel about Palin’s clothes. They called Michelle sophisticated and talked about Hillary’s powerful pantsuits. WHat planet are these people on?

Actually, not OT at all. Look at the polls about the debate. Obama WON 46/34. The media is in the tank for all of this and few on our side are even paying attention, it seems.

genso on September 28, 2008 at 11:22 AM

IrishEi on September 28, 2008 at 11:18 AM

McCotter says House Republicans will NOT back this new bill.

Hmm.. too bad but not a surprise considering:

As for Acorn and bankruptcy, they were never in the bill and even Obama has said all along that they need to come out. They were a decoy to distract conservatives. This bill is the same bill. Leadership just put lipstick on the pig.

From “another Hill aide” via Klo at the corner/NRO.

gh on September 28, 2008 at 11:23 AM

If you read the short pdf doc, you can come to your own conclusion if Fannie sounds serious about cleaning up its act, or whether the statement is self-serving BS.

JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 11:24 AM

OT: I just read the NTPost articel about Palin’s clothes. They called Michelle sophisticated and talked about Hillary’s powerful pantsuits. WHat planet are these people on?

I know why Hillary wears pantsuits. If she wore skirts, we could use her arse as a movie screen.

HornetSting on September 28, 2008 at 11:24 AM

At best, this plan is craptastic and we all know better than to have faith in any bi-partisan agreement.

I have a better plan . . . :oP

DannoJyd on September 28, 2008 at 11:25 AM

Fannie and Freddie? Still there.

Original legislation that caused this mess? Still in place.

Do the words: broken system ring a bell? How about: Good money after bad?

When will Congress finally take responsibility for its role in causing this mess? Oh, that’s right: NEVER. Expect ‘bailouts’ to now follow the ‘Feiler Faster Thesis’ and be more, more frequent, larger and have more ‘concerned groups of Congresscritters’.

ajacksonian on September 28, 2008 at 11:27 AM

O’ fer Christmas sake…FOX has some dimwit from CAP on right now, spinning that Obabo was the one who made things happen. She is also saying that even though Barky is back on the campaign trail instead of in D.C. is proof that he is in touch with America and blah freaking blah.

Bishop on September 28, 2008 at 11:27 AM

I know why Hillary wears pantsuits. If she wore skirts, we could use her arse as a movie screen.

HornetSting on September 28, 2008 at 11:24 AM

And the canckles…lol

IrishEi on September 28, 2008 at 11:27 AM

I have a better plan . . . :oP – DannoJyd on September 28, 2008 at 11:25 AM

No, you have an idiotic plan.

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 11:28 AM

JiangxiDad on September 28, 2008 at 11:24 AM

“review” “provide” “evaluate” Words like these do not make me feel better. I call BS.

genso on September 28, 2008 at 11:29 AM

Expect ‘bailouts’ to now follow the ‘Feiler Faster Thesis’ and be more, more frequent, larger and have more ‘concerned groups of Congresscritters’. – ajacksonian on September 28, 2008 at 11:27 AM

Sooner or later it will tumble like a house of cards. The tree of liberty is in dire need of watering.

ManlyRash on September 28, 2008 at 11:29 AM

This is good news. I will only be relieved once the bill is passed and the President signs it. Hopefully in the next few hours.

indythinker on September 28, 2008 at 11:30 AM

The tree of liberty is in dire need of watering.

The word you were looking for is “pruning.” Severe pruning.

genso on September 28, 2008 at 11:31 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 5


You must be logged in to post a comment.