Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Video: No, there was no deal on the bailout before McCain got there

posted at 4:13 pm on September 26, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Skip ahead to 3:00 and let Carl Cameron explain it all to you. The RNC is sending this around to shoot down the Dems’ claim that Maverick singlehandedly destroyed America’s economic recovery, but there are better spokesmen for the point they’re trying to make than a Fox News talking head. Over to you, Paul Kanjorski:

Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.) on Friday suggested Democratic leaders did not solicit enough input from House Republicans on the financial rescue package…

Asked whether House GOP lawmakers are right to believe they were slighted, Kanjorski replied, “I don’t know that we included them in enough, and that’s always a dangerous thing in politics. Remember, you’re dealing with egomaniacs. We’re all egomaniacs down here.”

Kanjorski, who faces a difficult reelection race, is a key player on the bailout package. He is chairman of the House Financial Services subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government-Sponsored Enterprises.

Kanjorski said, “Now, what we have to do is open that door for the House Republicans, bring them on in and say, ‘Guys, you know, we can’t cast your idea aside.’ Let’s listen to it … I think we have to allow them to talk their idea out. We have to be willing to listen.”

As Ed noted this morning, if by “deal” they mean mustering enough votes to pass the bill, that’s already been reached. All Pelosi has to do is pull the trigger. As it is, and as Cameron goes on to say later in the clip, McCain’s going to point to the fact that the House GOP is now fully included in the negotiations when it wasn’t before as his singular accomplishment over the past 24 hours and thus something that made the inevitable deal that’s reached more likely, not less.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Hah… I’m more a “Steel Dawn” kinda guy… more swordplay!
Romeo13 on September 26, 2008 at 5:31 PM

Get out.

Bishop on September 26, 2008 at 5:34 PM

He said basically that Obama’s negatives are around 45% and the reason for that is that he hasn’t really established any biographic image during the campaign so far. Which, incidentally was his advise to McCain during the last bit of the D’s primaries, and which I think culminated in the convention speeches – quite effectively looking at his fav/unfav. Anyway, he said that Obama hasn’t done that so the 1st debate will be when people are taking a look for themselves to hear/see that.

In short, he expects higher viewership, and he said the winner of the debate sets the expectations for the rest of the debates, etc. Ie unless something unusually significant happens, the events of the last 39 days will reinforce the images set by the first debate. He said historically 4 pt move in the polls is result of 1st debate but 00 & 04 had 9 pt move for Bush. Because of fluidity of independents, I think that is possible.

He also say he thought 80 million viewers tonight would be a lowball estimate. So comparing that will # of likely voters, I think tonight is huge.

Spirit of 1776 on September 26, 2008 at 5:35 PM

German for “link, please?”

Ah sorry, no link, just from hearing him on Fox last 1-2 days.

Spirit of 1776 on September 26, 2008 at 5:35 PM

Hah… I’m more a “Steel Dawn” kinda guy… more swordplay!
Romeo13 on September 26, 2008 at 5:31 PM

Get out.

Bishop on September 26, 2008 at 5:34 PM

Dang, banished to the Wasteland… guess I need to go join Humongeous!

Romeo13 on September 26, 2008 at 5:36 PM

I for one, hope they stick to foreign policy tonight. The talking heads are now suggesting it should be on the economy since the economy is at the forefront but this kind of reactionary bleating seems so un-Presidential. We’re all being led to believe that not pumping $700 billion + into Wall Street is somehow going to be the end of the Republic.

The best thing McCain can do is point out that his actions resulted in House Repubs being heard. Obama can’t point to anything he did as being constructive. He’ll try but hopefully the 80mil (more like 40mil — it is a Friday night afterall) will just chuckle at his attempts to act like he belongs at the grown-up’s table.

grdred944 on September 26, 2008 at 5:42 PM

grdred944 on September 26, 2008 at 5:42 PM

Concur, debating this means you HAVE to take opposing viewpoints…

Which, as the titular heads of their respective parties will pour gasoline on the fire, instead of trying to put it out…

Romeo13 on September 26, 2008 at 5:45 PM

This HA headline link shows 22% of Americans polled are uncertain of the presidential election outcome, so there could be a major shift in either direction. This Cameron report makes me more optimistic about a bailout bill passing that is not as bad as it could be. In that case, I’m betting it’s Obama that fails the “ready to lead” test in front of national audiences, not McCain. So, I’m still hopeful about the presidential election results.

Loxodonta on September 26, 2008 at 5:46 PM

Dang, banished to the Wasteland… guess I need to go join Humongeous!
Romeo13 on September 26, 2008 at 5:36 PM

That’s right. And even though you’re the enemy, I’ll give you a piece of advice: don’t try to catch any boomerangs without a chainmail glove.

Bishop on September 26, 2008 at 5:47 PM

I just wish people would treat this like the serious problem it is and come up with a compromise that makes sense to most people and that will actually help. All this finger pointing does not help. It just makes the whole thing seem kind of ridiculous.

Terrye on September 26, 2008 at 5:48 PM

Loxodonta:

I hope you are right.

Terrye on September 26, 2008 at 5:49 PM

Loxodonta on September 26, 2008 at 5:46 PM

I’m with you, Obava’s failure to really break out in the polls is because he still hasn’t convinced a huge swatch of people that he is trustworthy, though his message is mildly attractive coming on the heels of Dubya.

Mac may be a dry bone in front of the camera, but his message is steady. Obapo is a teleprompter guy, and if there are any direct exchanges between he and Mac, I don’t see him standing up well. McCain has many long years of giving speeches and press conferences, he has a mighty advantage in that respect.

Bishop on September 26, 2008 at 5:52 PM

Bishop on September 26, 2008 at 5:47 PM

No worries… its a simple parry in quarte…

/looks back at the wall, where his Matched 45 inch blade Rapiers hang…

Romeo13 on September 26, 2008 at 5:54 PM

Just to add to what others have said about how the nutroots will play Obama’s debate win/lose image, here’s my prediction:

“Obama was not prepared because McCain was playing a debate cat-and-mouse game – I will be there, no I won’t be there – on purpose to throw him off!!!!!”

That will be precious!

Mcguyver on September 26, 2008 at 5:54 PM

Terrye on September 26, 2008 at 5:48 PM

The Senate is where this issue will be decided. If they need 60 votes to close debate, McCain will have a lot to say about the outcome there.

Loxodonta on September 26, 2008 at 5:55 PM

Probably the best, and funnyest, cartoon commentary on the who’s the blame can be found at RedPlanet.

Kini on September 26, 2008 at 5:58 PM

I like Carl Cameron. He’s as eager to make sure the GOP perspective is understood as most of the media are for the Dems.

jgapinoy on September 26, 2008 at 8:22 PM

Over the last few months – and culminating in the failure of a number of financial companies last week – our economy has been experiencing a crisis created by the underwriting of loans that borrowers could not repay and the unchecked spreading of this risk across the entire financial system.

The Administration’s response to this crisis came last weekend in the form of a three-page proposal from Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson asking Congress for unlimited authority over $700 billion to buy this bad debt at taxpayer expense. Unsurprisingly, this proposal was met by stiff resistance – especially by me and my Republican colleagues in the House of Representatives who believe in smaller government and limiting taxpayer exposure.

Since its initial proposal, the press has widely reported that House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank and Senate Banking Chairman Chris Dodd have negotiated a number of changes with the Administration intended to shore up liberal support, including tax increases and giving judges new authorities that would drive up costs for homeowners who play by the rules and pay their mortgages on time.

In response, House Republicans have offered their own counter-proposal to the constantly-evolving compromise between the Administration and Democrat Leadership. The Republican proposal would insure mortgage-backed securities through the payment of insurance premiums instead of providing taxpayer-funded purchases of frozen mortgage assets as the current proposal would do. At the end of this email please find a broad outline of this Republican economic rescue plan for your review.

This proposal also includes measures to increase transparency and prevent Wall Street Executives from benefiting from taxpayer funding, as well as measures that would increase private capital involvement in the recovery and reduce taxpayer exposure while addressing the underlying issues creating the crisis in our capital markets.

As negotiations over this unfinished package proceed, I will continue to insist on the inclusion of the following principles in the final package:

- Reforming the market failures that allowed this crisis to happen;

- Protecting taxpayer assets;

- Preventing executives from personally benefiting from private sector failure, and;

- Encouraging private capital to fix the underlying problems in order to limit taxpayer exposure.

As your Congressman, I take my responsibility to the taxpayer very seriously. Rest assured that before I vote on the final proposal (whatever form it takes), I will seriously consider your comments and put the best interests of taxpayers and homeowners who play by the rules first. If you have any questions or comments that you would like to share, feel free to contact my Chief of Staff Guy Harrison or Deputy Chief of Staff Josh Saltzman at 202.225.2231.

Sincerely,

Pete Sessions

Member of Congress

paulsur on September 26, 2008 at 11:43 PM

Carl Cameron has been an unabashed shill for Juan “Z-Visa” McCain during the primaries and still is one today. He’s kinda like Andrea Mitchell is for The Dali Bama…

DfDeportation on September 27, 2008 at 12:37 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.