Video: What if Congress passed Card Check for all elections?
posted at 1:10 pm on September 25, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
This humorous take on the EFCA comes from Save the Election, the 527 opposed to the Card Check legislation backed by Democrats, especially Barack Obama and Al Franken. It mixes parody of Congress and the mainstream media with actual street interviews with people responding to the idea of eliminating secret ballots from union organizing. Voters appear to value the secret ballot much more than Democrats do:
Pretty funny, although I think the Johnny Sac ads were more effective and got to the point much more quickly. This works as well, especially with the reactions Save the Election elicited from these interview subjects.
John Motley describes at National Review the effects of removing secret ballots from organizing efforts. It’s not pretty. I emphasized the last line for a purpose:
The key offending provision of the bill provides that instead of a private election with a secret ballot that is overseen by the National Labor Relations Board, union organizers would only be required to obtain the signatures of 50 percent plus one of the employees in a workplace to certify a union. If union organizers were able to — by whatever means they can think of — collect enough signatures, the secret ballot would be unnecessary and eliminated from the process. This system is known as “card check” — a very un-American proposal.
As McGovern warned with this system: “there are many documented cases where workers have been pressured, harassed, tricked or intimidated into signing cards that have led to mandatory payment of dues.” In hearings in the House of Representatives in 2002, Bruce Esgar, an employee of MGM Grand Hotel in Las Vegas described such a case when he testified that union organizers threatened that workers who did not sign union cards would lose their jobs when the union was recognized. In testimony in 2007, Ricardo Torres, a long-time organizer for the United Steelworkers felt compelled to quit his job, according to his testimony, after “a senior Steelworkers union official asked me to threaten migrant workers by telling them they would be reported to federal immigration officials if they refused to sign check-off cards.” Jen Jason, a former organizer for UNITE-HERE also testified in 2007 to the fact that they “rarely showed workers what an actual union contract looked like because we knew that it wouldn’t necessarily reflect what a worker would want to see. We were trained to avoid topics such as dues increases, strike histories, etc. and to constantly move the worker back to what the organizer identified as his or her “issues” during the first part of the housecall. This technique was commonly referred to as “re-agitation” during organizer training sessions.”
What does that recall for Hot Air readers? Barack Obama’s days as a “community organizer”, as this is the Alinksy Method in action. Small wonder Obama likes the idea of Card Check — it fits right into his mindset.
The EFCA will set back employee rights by decades and leave them at the mercy of both union bosses and management, torn apart in tugs-of-war in every workplace targeted by organizers. Secret ballots have been the one true protection from exploitation that workers have. The party that wants this protection stripped is no friend of the working class, but instead the cronies of union bosses looking for a massive increase in dues, personal income, and political clout.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
How nice. I’m shocked!
dean_acheson on September 25, 2008 at 1:13 PM
When they lose over and over, they will constantly scream about fake disenfranchisement and fraud.
Mazztek on September 25, 2008 at 1:15 PM
See, I’d just turn this around on Democrats. I’d make ads saying that Democrats want to let companies fire workers who attempt to unionize, by making the names of those who vote for the union public.
That’s why they did secret ballots in the first place.
lorien1973 on September 25, 2008 at 1:17 PM
I was under the impression the dems wanted to implement this for all elections, especially federal ones.
Vashta.Nerada on September 25, 2008 at 1:17 PM
don’t give the dems any ideas…vote the right way or da union boyz will come and make you an offer you can’t refuse…
right4life on September 25, 2008 at 1:18 PM
In certain cities, you might not wanna stand up and say NO to the union … ya might end up swimmin’ with the fishes.
Tony737 on September 25, 2008 at 1:18 PM
If the Democrats used secret ballots in their caucuses, Obama might not be their nominee.
OF COURSE he likes Card Check. It makes the world safer for Chicago politics.
NeighborhoodCatLady on September 25, 2008 at 1:22 PM
Someone needs to do a comprehensive exposé about unions. For example, how they can make an entire political party scuttle trade agreements with Colombia.
Freddoso’s book went into detail about their mutual backscratching with Obama.
RushBaby on September 25, 2008 at 1:24 PM
First card check, then it’ll be “why have contested elections at all?” They’re messy, costly, give rise to corruption via campaign contributions, and at times the wrong people (Rethuglicans) win.
rbj on September 25, 2008 at 1:26 PM
Democratic Party…working to end democracy in a key sector of society?
Democratic but not democratic?
Puritan1648 on September 25, 2008 at 1:33 PM
Hey, I’m just glad it’ll be a short ride from Dependence to Tyranny. That way freedom might swing around quicker.
lorien1973 on September 25, 2008 at 1:34 PM
That’s not very hope-y.
CP on September 25, 2008 at 1:34 PM
I’m still confused as to how it can be possible (constitutional)at all for there to be a way for unions to force unwilling workers to join just because more than half of their coworkers want to. Can someone explain that to me?
Count to 10 on September 25, 2008 at 1:35 PM
Racist.
lorien1973 on September 25, 2008 at 1:38 PM
Not an expert, but in many states (non Right-to-work states) you must be a union member to work in a union shop. Michigan is one of these states. I am guessing that if the shop goes 51% for the union and you want to keep your job, you pay the dues.
Vashta.Nerada on September 25, 2008 at 1:39 PM
There argument is (I am not on their side, so don’t diss me on this):
Everyone benefits from the unions negotiations, they can’t have two classes of people for pay, unions and non-unions, so their argument is that the unions benefit all people. The companies would entice people not to join to bankrupt the unions, or that non-union members receive the benefits of union involvement without supporting the union. Therefore, everyone must be unionized. And the courts have gone along with this reasoning.
right2bright on September 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM
Rather, enforce CITIZEN VOTER ID.
maverick muse on September 25, 2008 at 1:49 PM
My uncle (a member of the Teamster’s Union) tells a story (proudly, I might add) about how he and another coworker were sent to spend a day following a guy that wasn’t crazy about joining the union. They never approached him and they didn’t physically harm him or his property (which is why my uncle seems to think there was nothing wrong with what they did) but the guy got the message and stopped causing trouble for the union.
That, in a shameful nutshell, is why secret ballots on union matters are absolutely necessary.
JadeNYU on September 25, 2008 at 1:55 PM
Hey, I have an idea.
Why not just hold a private election among Union Members to see if they want public ballots?
I know, there is no room for this sort of thinking in DEMOCRAT Party circles.
Elizabetty on September 25, 2008 at 1:56 PM
I was dropped into the rather farcical TA union as a grad student (or, at least, dues were taken automatically from my paycheck). I seriously would have taken a pay cut just so that the union didn’t get a cut of my pay. As it was, I completely ignored the strikes (which the university didn’t recognize as legal, anyway).
Count to 10 on September 25, 2008 at 2:00 PM
I oppose card-check for union elections, however I am totally in favor of card check for all other elections …
the check of the photo ID card before you vote, that is
DJ Dubya on September 25, 2008 at 2:05 PM
Off topic but, if Obama were a conservative how long would it take Moveon.org to use the pic on the front page in a “He’s a Nazi” ad?
srhoades on September 25, 2008 at 2:22 PM
Actually, this bill puts workers under threat from union organizers (blackmail, threats, physical intimidation), AND possible management retaliation.
Right_of_Attila on September 25, 2008 at 3:02 PM
the secret ballot problem is moot if they don’t get a vote at all…
-
only the owners of the companies should choose if they allow a union… if employees don’t like it they can leave… unions destroy businesses. just because employees don’t have the spine to demand fair pay or leave… instead they rely on the mob/union to hold the companies ransom from production or service… pushing prices ever higher… and killing our ability to compete world wide. your job is worth as much as someone is willing to pay you to do it…
-
if you find your employer will not pay you more or give you more benefits, then it’s time to start looking for a new job while you work for him… then move over into another industry or another employer who will offer you what you want. if no one will work for him, then he’ll increase his pay and probably his price… but if he’s held hostage and his prices keep going up every 1/4 3% eternally… he’s not going to keep producing….
-
no one is saying you can’t talk about how much you make and how much you want to make and share that with your profession’s peers… but a specific group ransoming specific companies one at a time, holding them hostage with law suits and work stopages… that does no one any good… it make people close shop. and move or just close shop.
Kaptain Amerika on September 25, 2008 at 3:06 PM
No private ballot, not more backdoor Congressional meetings for anything. EVER
madmonkphotog on September 25, 2008 at 3:21 PM