Palin faces the press — and both survive

posted at 1:40 pm on September 25, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

Sarah Palin held a spontaneous press availability today while touring Ground Zero, and the world did not come screeching to oblivion.  Hotline has the transcript available, courtesy of Peter Hamby at CNN, and it’s remarkable for its ordinariness.  After Palin gave a version of the “never again” mantra spoken by politicians of all stripes, she took a few questions from the press:

CNN: On the topic of never letting this happen again, do you agree with the way the Bush administration has handled the war on terrorism, is there anything you would do differently?

A: I agree with the Bush administration that we take the fight to them. We never again let them come onto our soil and try to destroy not only our democracy, but communities like the community of New York. Never again. So yes, I do agree with taking the fight to the terrorists and stopping them over there.

POLITICO: Do you think our presence in iraq and afghan and our continued presence there is inflaming islamic extremists?

A: I think our presence in iraq and afghanistan will lead to further security of our nation, again, because the mission is to take the fight over there. do not let them come over here and attempt again what they accomplished here, and that was some destruction. terrible destruction on that day. but since september 11, americans uniting and rebuilding and committing to never letting that happen again.

She also fielded questions about Ted Stevens (on which she demurred while the trial awaits) and on the bailout package, which she opposes without McCain’s changes being added.  No stumbles, no rhetorical gaffes, and no contradictions of her running mate’s policies, all of which Joe Biden produced this week alone.

We can take a couple of lessons from this interaction.  First, Palin doesn’t need protection from the media, and it’s a mistake to leave that impression.  Like it or not, politicians have to account for themselves to the media in our culture, and that’s not a bad thing — although it would be helpful for both the electorate and the media if the latter practiced that in an even-handed manner.  If Palin wants to play on the world-class stage, she has to show herself as a world-class player, and the McCain strategy of keeping her sidelined does not bolster confidence in her status.

People rightly talk about the double standard applied to Palin, and it’s there, as the media reaction to the series of stupidities coming from Biden’s mouth this week shows.  However, that misses the point.  Biden’s been around Washington for four decades and is a known quantity.  Barack Obama has been campaigning nationally for the better part of two years, doing interviews and taking questions (unhappily at times), and is also a known quantity.  Palin is the first new thing in this election cycle in two years, and she’s never played on the national stage before now.  The nation needs to see her in action, not just on the stump but also in the contentious media relationship that she will have to manage for at least the next four years if McCain wins.  That’s part of the job, fortunately and unfortunately.

Some say that Reagan took a different approach in bypassing the media to talk to the American voters directly.  That’s true, but Reagan actually used the media to accomplish that.  He talked to everyone, tangled with reporters at pressers, and skillfully used those opportunities to lift his voice past the media.  He didn’t sequester himself from the media during any part of his remarkable political career, but mastered them instead.

Let Palin be Palin.  Since Biden insists on setting the bar ever lower, she can hardly fail, and she may turn into quite a good communicator herself.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Well how many days does she need…the longer you wait the stupider the questions will be

Remember, it is only 40 days until a new president will be making decisions.

tomas on September 25, 2008 at 3:25 PM

WTF is up with that anyways? 7 years later and they haven’t even started anything? It’s pathetic.

Let’s roll!

ex-Democrat on September 25, 2008 at 3:29 PM

entrque says: “she DIDN’T say “you can certainly argue that our actions have motivated certain terrorist groups, but we’ve deposed the Taliban, defeated Al Qaeda in Iraq, and continue to fight Al Qaeda in Afghanistan-Pakistan.”

I’m impressed a**hat!! You sit at home and come up with (what you think are) devastating answers. That’s why Palin’s running for VP, and you’re blogging from your mother’s basement. Do us all a favor and free up the bandwidth on this site.

alwyr on September 25, 2008 at 3:31 PM

DaveS:

That is pretty much the most concise example of circular reasoning that I could conjure up, if my job were to conjure up a spectacularly exaggerated example of circular reasoning.

Guess it’s not necessary to dispose you of your clueless notions as ManlyRash has already destroyed your premise and argument.

JonPrichard on September 25, 2008 at 3:32 PM

WTF is up with that anyways? 7 years later and they haven’t even started anything? It’s pathetic.

Some of the larger tenants are dropping out becuase of the delays. Appears to be delays in the basebuild.

Overbudget and overdue. What else would it be in NYC?

Mr_Magoo on September 25, 2008 at 3:40 PM

entrque says: “she DIDN’T say “you can certainly argue that our actions have motivated certain terrorist groups, but we’ve deposed the Taliban, defeated Al Qaeda in Iraq, and continue to fight Al Qaeda in Afghanistan-Pakistan.”

As the General on M.A.S.H once said, “This is a press conference. The last thing we want to do is answer a lot of questions.”

Politicians never inflame the situation and she would not have done that in respect to what happened there. That would have been bragging and disrespectful to those who died there. She did the right thing.

Mr_Magoo on September 25, 2008 at 3:44 PM

I more or less agree, but there are significant differences between Reagan’s political career and Palin’s. Reagan got into politics by using his fame as an actor and SAG president to endorse other political candidates on the national stage before he actually ran for any office himself. Palin, by contrast, started her career in local politics and has only come to national prominence by virtue of someone else’s initiative. So it makes sense that for her to take some time to learn the ropes before confronting a hostile media.

Also, it is worth noting that Reagan’s first bid at the presidency (in the 1968 primaries) failed despite his name recognitiion and political experience. Not exactly the kind of parallel we are hoping for here.

JackOfClubs on September 25, 2008 at 3:47 PM

Let’s rephrase it the way most people are going to hear it, outside of the bubble you guys are living in:

I think our presence in Iraq and Afghanistan will lead to further security of our nation, again, because the mission is to fight them in Iraq in Afghanistan.

The most charitable interpretation that she will be afforded by most people is:

I think our presence in Iraq and Afghanistan will lead to further security of our nation, again, because the mission is to fight them in Iraq in Afghanistan instead of here.

In both instances, she is “begging the question”, which always feels like a fallacy even if one can’t name the fallacy.

DaveS on September 25, 2008 at 3:47 PM

In both instances, she is “begging the question”, which always feels like a fallacy even if one can’t name the fallacy. – DaveS on September 25, 2008 at 3:47 PM

That’s because it’s a fallacy only in your mind. I already demonstrated otherwise – with linguistic precision and irrefutable logic. The only people who are going to “hear it” the way you describe are the people who want to hear it the way you describe.

Game over, Dave. Thanks for playing.

ManlyRash on September 25, 2008 at 3:53 PM

DaveS on September 25, 2008 at 3:47 PM

Or maybe – shock and horror – you can just take what she said as she said it instead of reorganizing and rewording it into a way you can pick apart.

Novel concept, eh?

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on September 25, 2008 at 3:53 PM

I think in about a week to 10 days you will see Sarah off the leash and then barry and plugs will really have their hands full

oxnard777 on September 25, 2008 at 4:00 PM

I think our presence in iraq and afghanistan will lead to further security of our nation, again, because the mission is to take the fight over there. do not let them come over here and attempt again what they accomplished here, and that was some destruction. terrible destruction on that day. but since september 11, americans uniting and rebuilding and committing to never letting that happen again.

Is that a rough transcript or something? Because if she actually spoke that way…good god.

crr6 on September 25, 2008 at 4:02 PM

um..um.uummm…ummmm..uummmm.uumm.um

tomas on September 25, 2008 at 4:10 PM

let her off the leash, she will destroy the media.

unseen on September 25, 2008 at 4:13 PM

Video of Palin:

http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=5885383

powerpro on September 25, 2008 at 4:19 PM

We neede Tim Pawlenty…he is brilliant and doesn’t need hand holding.

tomas on September 25, 2008 at 3:16 PM

I take it you don’t live in Minnesota.

Sure, we need someone who loves to slap “user fees” on everything, supports the AGW hype and runs one of the largest welfare states in the country.

When he starts to make a dent in the number of buses required between Chicago and Minneapolis on the 1st and 15th of each month, then I’ll get excited.

darury on September 25, 2008 at 4:19 PM

DaveS on September 25, 2008 at 3:47 PM

Strike three.

geckomon on September 25, 2008 at 4:23 PM

crr6 on September 25, 2008 at 4:02 PM

Is that a rough transcript or something? Because if she actually spoke that way…good god.

Sadly, if you look up the thread you can see that there is no shortage of people who are convinced that this was a “good” answer.

DaveS on September 25, 2008 at 4:25 PM

ManlyRash on September 25, 2008 at 3:53 PM

That’s because it’s a fallacy only in your mind.

Explain then how she substantiated the premise that “fighting them over there” was the correct thing to do. It comes off as regurgitating talking points for the sake of regurgitating talking points.

Grue in the Attic on September 25, 2008 at 3:53 PM

Or maybe – shock and horror – you can just take what she said as she said it instead of reorganizing and rewording it into a way you can pick apart.

OK…

I think our presence in Iraq and Afghanistan will lead to further security of our nation, again, because the mission is to fight them in Iraq in Afghanistan instead of here over there.

That changed nothing and actually reduced the quality of the answer, but are you happy?

DaveS on September 25, 2008 at 4:28 PM

I love that picture of Sarah, Ed. Looks like here adoring crowd is sweeping her away to the White House!

Contrast that with grim-faced Andrea Mitchell drowning in a sea of balloons…

Mr_Magoo on September 25, 2008 at 4:33 PM

are you happy?

DaveS on September 25, 2008 at 4:28 PM

yep skippy, sure am.

Onager on September 25, 2008 at 4:34 PM

Is that a rough transcript or something? Because if she actually spoke that way…good god.

Add an “um” after every three words and you’ve got Obama.

Jim Treacher on September 25, 2008 at 5:21 PM

I agree with previous HA bloggers on different threads that if McCain is busy with something important Friday the 26th (like saving the country from financial disaster) and Obama and the MSM still insist on a debate that day, send Sarah in as a designated hitter!!!

Sarah would be more than a match for Barry, and that would make the Dems/MSM (really the same organization) rue the day that they tried to use debate scheduling to obstruct a Senator who takes his job seriously!!!

landlines on September 25, 2008 at 5:22 PM

They are holding this Pit Bull in restraint until she meets Joe and then watch her go. She is in command and folks will see juust what she is made of……


GO SARAH!!

Herb on September 25, 2008 at 5:53 PM

A reading of the transcript shows sloppy syntax….but seeing the video for the first time surprised me. She actually seemed very confident today.

nyrofan on September 25, 2008 at 6:02 PM

Add an “um” after every three words and you’ve got Obama.

Jim Treacher on September 25, 2008 at 5:21 PM

Obama can still speak in complete sentences. When Palin speaks contemporaneously baby koalas die.

crr6 on September 25, 2008 at 6:58 PM

I hope she keeps talking to the press. This is awesome.

chiefeditor on September 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM

I’m annoyed that she didn’t bother to answer the reporter’s questions in the block that was quoted. The first question was “would you have done anything differently?” and the second question was “do you think our actions over there have inflamed Islamic terrorists?” She answered the first by stating what she’d do the same and the second with a “fight them there, not here” platitude. Sure, she’s more fluent than Obama off the cuff, but she’s not putting any thought into her responses and it shows. Hopefully she changes this pattern at the debates.

Obama can still speak in complete sentences. When Palin speaks contemporaneously baby koalas die.

crr6 on September 25, 2008 at 6:58 PM

I believe you mean “extemporaneously” and “baby moose.” And her answers above are in complete sentences, so I don’t see what your problem is.

Math_Mage on September 25, 2008 at 8:41 PM

Obama can still speak in complete sentences. When Palin speaks contemporaneously baby koalas die. crr6 on September 25, 2008 at 6:58 PM

Spoken like a true liberal.

When obama speaks (as a state senator) baby humans die.

Mojave Mark on September 25, 2008 at 9:15 PM

Comment pages: 1 2