Counterstrike: Mark Levin goes nuclear on O’Reilly over bailout rant
posted at 8:56 pm on September 25, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
It’s a special man indeed who can make both O’R’s and Olbermann’s enemies lists. Courtesy of Levin’s producer, a modest response to this morning’s sneak attack reducing Bill to a bold fresh piece of humanity:
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »
score, no annoying linkin park theme
Xolom on September 25, 2008 at 8:58 PM
Levin owns.
p0s3r on September 25, 2008 at 9:00 PM
Love the Ted Baxter line. O’Reilly really needs to STFU here. Insulting your core audience isn’t exactly the track you want to go down.
He should really lose the radio gig and stop embarrassing himself further.
Vintage Levin.
JammieWearingFool on September 25, 2008 at 9:00 PM
Levin…the great one! Man doesn’t mince words…plus I like his accent!
AUINSC on September 25, 2008 at 9:00 PM
I love mark levin but he is wrong this time.
we dont need idealogues right now. we need a deal.
the free market wasnt working in this market with the quasi governmental agencies mac and may. so, a pure free market solution wont work.
do a deal and THEN fix the issue…assuming you have republicans in charge which you wont since democraps run the congress and no matter who wins the white house…its pretty much a democrat in financial policy
Roger Waters on September 25, 2008 at 9:00 PM
“…utterly unencumbered with information…”
My nomination for the quote of the day.
Unfortunately, this applies equally well to most of our politicians.
Y-not on September 25, 2008 at 9:01 PM
I heard it live. Full of win.
carbon_footprint on September 25, 2008 at 9:02 PM
You’ve seen the beginnings of this for quite some time now. Rush’s comments in the New York Times Magazine piece with Zev Chafets were like the signal that it was about to boil over.
D0WNT0WN on September 25, 2008 at 9:03 PM
Bernanke’s twin.
Cardiganfox on September 25, 2008 at 9:03 PM
Darn, I love this guy, he is on the money 99% of the time
foxone on September 25, 2008 at 9:03 PM
Agree.
MayBee on September 25, 2008 at 9:03 PM
LOL Me too! Actually, the Ted Baxter thing was originally from Rush. So true too. O’Reilly’s a pompous ass.
IrishEi on September 25, 2008 at 9:04 PM
O’Reilley is wrong more often than not. Can’t tell where he is on the ideological spectrum. On economics he comes across populist and Liberal. Certainly not Conservative. His rants against the oil companies are tiresome.
DerKrieger on September 25, 2008 at 9:04 PM
newt kickin butt on hannity and colmes.
lorien1973 on September 25, 2008 at 9:04 PM
While I was tending toward the bailout, I’m now reconsidering, thanks largely to voices like Newt, Levin, Stossel (tonight on FNC) et al.
Nationalizing the financial sector is a really bad move, and if there’s any way to relieve adequately the credit crunch without it, then it’s worth a try. Besides, free markets require the freedom to fail.
petefrt on September 25, 2008 at 9:05 PM
Wait! Now I’m conflicted about the quote of the day. This from Newt:
“…Obama is acting appropriately for a first term Senator who is a natural back-bencher…”
Y-not on September 25, 2008 at 9:06 PM
“utterly unencumbered with information.”
That EXACTLY describes O’Reilly. What a joke. What a moron indeed.
TheBigOldDog on September 25, 2008 at 9:08 PM
This attitude makes me laugh. So typical of the leftward side of the government and the financial fatcats who have been scamming huge profits over the years: “give us lots and lots of money with no strings attached so we can keep what we’ve extorted, We can talk about ‘fixes’ later. Maybe. If we feel like it.”
MrScribbler on September 25, 2008 at 9:08 PM
I agree with Jack Welch and all the business leaders. I agree with Greenspan, etc. Lets get real.
Newt Gingrich..I have NO respect for this global warming hoax believing, nancy pelosi ass kicking douche…he is wrong as usual.
M Levin: I have tons of respect for…but we need a practical solution and elect republicans to fix the underlying problems…
Now, I agree that Bill OReilly is an embarrassment…and he is wrong on all his B.S….but we need a deal not these republican house members that are not seeing the big picture and are sticking to their idealogy.
Throwing the country into a deep recession will hurt everybody.
Roger Waters on September 25, 2008 at 9:09 PM
Normally I don’t listen to Mark Levin, he’s a little to intense for me. Going to have to listen to his show tonight though. Wonder what kind of blood pressure medicine he pops like candy.
Tommy_G on September 25, 2008 at 9:09 PM
Levin is the definitive example of impotent rage. I can’t help but laugh when he throws these childish temper tantrums.
Caiwyn on September 25, 2008 at 9:10 PM
I’ve been listening to Mark Levin since he first started. I don’t think I have ever disagreed with him on anything. He’s rock solid.
IrishEi on September 25, 2008 at 9:11 PM
I love Mark but I tend to agree with you. Mark knows the Government caused the mess but he doesn’t seem to think they have a responsibility to clean up their mess. I have an open mind and can be persuaded either way at this point but I looked into the abyss last Thursday and I know what’s coming if something isn’t done.
TheBigOldDog on September 25, 2008 at 9:12 PM
“This attitude makes me laugh. So typical of the leftward side of the government and the financial fatcats who have been scamming huge profits over the years: “give us lots and lots of money with no strings attached so we can keep what we’ve extorted, We can talk about ‘fixes’ later. Maybe. If we feel like it.”
MrScribbler”
You sound ignorant dude. People who know what they are talking about say the government has a good chance at MAKING money on the deal like they did with the RTC bailout, Mexico bailout, Chrysler bailout. The “bailouts” ended up making the government money. certainly, it wont be a 700 million price tag…that is just ignorant.
get educated dude.
Roger Waters on September 25, 2008 at 9:12 PM
All Hail Levin!
dmann on September 25, 2008 at 9:12 PM
O’Reilly needs to realize his ratings are coming from Mary Katharine and Laura Ingraham’s appearances, and not because he’s as relevant as he used to be. He’s become a great big doofus.
AubieJon on September 25, 2008 at 9:12 PM
Yeah…Papa bear…populist machine…he would be more effective if he weren’t living in 1933 America…
AUINSC on September 25, 2008 at 9:13 PM
You guys pulling this line about ideology, which I keep hearing over and over again are very suspicious. Why do I get the feeling you could really give a sheet about the country and actually are looking to cover your own investments.
I am not buying into it. If you noble realists want to “save” the economy then return that 700B to the taxpayers that provided it.
ClassicCon on September 25, 2008 at 9:16 PM
“O’Reilly needs to realize his ratings are coming from Mary Katharine and Laura Ingraham’s appearances”
hopefully, you are joking. Ingraham lasted about a week. I like her but she is hard to watch, despite being a babe, because she is a live wire and has a hard time controlling herself.
And mary katherine? what are you, a hot air reader?
no, they dont give him the ratings…hopefully you were kidding.
Roger Waters on September 25, 2008 at 9:16 PM
There is a statue of Mark Levin in my heart. God Bless Mark Levin.
redneck hippie on September 25, 2008 at 9:16 PM
700 BILLION dude. Not million.
And is our federal government supposed to function like that? Where in the constitution can you find that?
Xolom on September 25, 2008 at 9:16 PM
we dont need idealogues right now. we need a deal.
You mean,, we don’t need principle, we don’t need to worry about what is right,, we just need a deal,, any deal.
JellyToast on September 25, 2008 at 9:16 PM
GetRogered likes to throw in little bits such as “democraps” to try and throw people off the trail.
Nein bissen.
Bishop on September 25, 2008 at 9:17 PM
I tell people that Fox news is the most balance news program, and they rant about O’Reilly. I read his page at Foxnews.com for a while, but he always seemed to irritate me (even when I agreed with his point).
I only recently learned what “Jumped the Shark” means. Who thinks it applies here?
Count to 10 on September 25, 2008 at 9:17 PM
I don’t like the bent O’R’s been taking for awhile now … he seems pretty ignorant to the basics of capitalism. Also … he’s not very loyal to the people who made him what he is today. Mark Levin OWNS!
HondaV65 on September 25, 2008 at 9:18 PM
“I am not buying into it. If you noble realists want to “save” the economy then return that 700B to the taxpayers that provided it.
ClassicCon ”
Thanks for proving that you dont have the foggiest idea what the hell you are talking about. What 700B are you talking about? Nobody and I mean NOBODY thinks the bailout will cost the government and the taxpayers 700b. That is the amount of money to BUY THE ASSETS THAT ARE SECURED WITH REAL ESTATE, FOOL. The government has the luxury of auctioning off the assets in such a way as to recoup most if not all if not make a profit on the assets.
Best not to type when you are talking out of your ass.
Roger Waters on September 25, 2008 at 9:18 PM
That was the bit that clicked with me too.
I don’t usually listen to Levin (inconvenient time in my market) but when I’ve tuned in the thing that strikes me about his show is the way he makes the case and backs up each and every statement with facts. Utterly unlike O’Reilly who essentially makes it up as he goes.
highhopes on September 25, 2008 at 9:19 PM
This is hotair.com, Pinky. You missed the turn when you were typing http://www.imafukingliberalweeniesobamatonguebather.com. Bye.
AubieJon on September 25, 2008 at 9:19 PM
nonfactor? I knew there was something up with that guy.
- The Cat
MirCat on September 25, 2008 at 9:19 PM
People who know what they are talking about say the government has a good chance at MAKING money on the deal
A good chance, well that’s comforting considering we’re talking about 700+ billion dollars. And of course the government is going to send everyone a rebate check when they possibly maybe make this money back.
Yah, and monkeys will fly out of my butt.
Bishop on September 25, 2008 at 9:20 PM
Whenever time I hear Levin’s name I think of that clip Hannity plays: “Get off the phone, ya big jerk!” Makes me laugh every time.
O’Reilly’s a tiresome bloviator and Levin’s right about his being jealous of Rush.
Lurking Vet on September 25, 2008 at 9:20 PM
Is there a link to an MP3 of this, or an exterior link? I can never get the embedded MP3s working in firefox.
MadisonConservative on September 25, 2008 at 9:20 PM
“And is our federal government supposed to function like that? Where in the constitution can you find that?
Xolom ”
Uh, I think you know that i meant billion. So, reagan wasnt following the constitution when he bailed out Chrysler. You purists are a joke. Get out of your basement and check out the real world.
Roger Waters on September 25, 2008 at 9:20 PM
I got it working on Linux, i;m using Firefox(However I’m using Linux at the moment not sure what plug-in it’s using..)
Hopefully AP can post a link to download the file
Chakra Hammer on September 25, 2008 at 9:22 PM
lorien1973
Yep, Newt shot down Colmes big time….Colmes had to pull back and concede ‘maybe your right’.
As for Levin, he’s spot on about OR’s latest comments.
GarandFan on September 25, 2008 at 9:22 PM
You’ve got to be patient. Most people are completely ignorant of macro economics and the financial system. Take the time to explain or just avoid the discussion. I’ve talked about it before most people here even knew it was happening. I’m done. Your turn.
TheBigOldDog on September 25, 2008 at 9:22 PM
Whenever
timeI hear Levin’s name….Sorry – PIMF
Lurking Vet on September 25, 2008 at 9:22 PM
It’s a slam–and it’s a good one. :)
Basically, he called Obama a rookie who should be warming a bench rather than playing in the big game.
Matt Helm on September 25, 2008 at 9:23 PM
And if this deal ended up making money and if there are enough inbred morons in this country to elect OBambi, your head will spin at the growth rate of the government. O will use every bit of what profit there might be to fund his social programs and all the other crap he dreams up.
AubieJon on September 25, 2008 at 9:23 PM
O’Rielly doesn’t have time to be informed because this Harvard educated bonehead is still trying to chase down that one guy out there who sets the oil prices.
He’s having as much luck as OJ is trying to find the killers of his former wife.
John Doe on September 25, 2008 at 9:23 PM
http://hotair.cachefly.net/audio/levin-or.mp3
Right click, save as.
- The Cat
P.S.
Use the source Luke!
MirCat on September 25, 2008 at 9:23 PM
“This is hotair.com, Pinky. You missed the turn when you were typing http://www.imafukingliberalweeniesobamatonguebather.com. Bye.
AubieJon ”
Its Pink, not Pinky. a bit of an assclown I see.
You guys like Newt Gingrich. even after he have us a demonstration on oral sex with Al Gore? dumb
Roger Waters on September 25, 2008 at 9:23 PM
Throwing the country into socialism will hurt for much longer. I should not be held responsible for bad decisions on either the lender or the borrower. Thats crap.
Big Orange on September 25, 2008 at 9:24 PM
Sorry, hit send before finishing my thought.
Newt also meant that all Obama is good for is sitting on the bench.
Matt Helm on September 25, 2008 at 9:24 PM
As Ed outlined here, this whole damn thing was caused by governmet intrusion, namely the Community Reinvestment Act.
This was not really the fault of the private sector. So, in the name of principle, we are not going to aid the private sector? The taxpayer is on the hook, yes, but the taxpayer let the Democrats get away with this Fannie May/Freddie Mac crapola. So the solution, albeit painful, fits.
silverfox on September 25, 2008 at 9:24 PM
Strange.
I’ve never liked O’Reilly as much as I do after hearing his rant. I liked it.
Ideologues bore me. And he’s right to call both sides on the carpet on this one.
I’m conservative because I know conservatism is generally far more effective in governance than liberalism. But unlike far to many, that doesn’t mean I check my critical thinking at the door when I listen to conservatives.
They don’t get pass because they’re on my side. If anything, they get more scrutiny. Because my side should be held to a higher standard. I expect stupidity from liberals; if they weren’t stupid, they wouldn’t be liberal, after all.
Good for Bill. I’m sort of impressed. And Bill rarely impresses me.
Here’s the irony from my perspective: 95% of the time, I think Levin would have been right with the Ted Baxter comment. Spot on, in fact.
But I don’t think its applicable here.
Professor Blather on September 25, 2008 at 9:24 PM
I love the Great One!
O’Reilly has been getting on my nerves for quite a while.
jencab on September 25, 2008 at 9:25 PM
“You’ve got to be patient. Most people are completely ignorant of macro economics and the financial system. Take the time to explain or just avoid the discussion. I’ve talked about it before most people here even knew it was happening. I’m done. Your turn.
TheBigOldDog”
HA HA Good point, bro.
Republicans are smarter than democraps, for sure on average. Put they can be just as ignorant…like these people.
Roger Waters on September 25, 2008 at 9:25 PM
Boy Oh Boy, we allowed Bush to split the party again 40 days before the election. I’m hoping for an October surprise, we can’t afford an Obama Presidency.
tdavisjr on September 25, 2008 at 9:26 PM
Really douchebag? So they don’t have to pay for these assests up front? Since you are so versed on the subject, you quote me to a fooking penny how much profit my government seeks to gain off of auctioning off these assests. I don’t want anymore bullsheet estimations, you give me the exact amount since it is such a certain good deal.
Oh, and if it is such a great deal, why does it require our government to do it?
ClassicCon on September 25, 2008 at 9:26 PM
You’ve *never* disagreed with him?
Don’t you find that a little bit frightening?
If I ever found somebody I always agreed with, I’d take a good long look in the mirror – and check my Kool-Aid supply. Critical thinking doesn’t hurt.
Professor Blather on September 25, 2008 at 9:27 PM
I know Pink, and you sir are no Pink and never will be. That’s why you’re Pinky. As far as that other stuff you tried to type, your genetics must be getting in the way.
AubieJon on September 25, 2008 at 9:28 PM
Tech bubble, Y2k
We need this bailout right away
It’s the end of the world as we know it
It’s the end of the world as we know it
Al Gore Cries
- The Cat
MirCat on September 25, 2008 at 9:30 PM
I don’t know why, but I think of O’Reilly….and if I think of Obama in the vicinity of that thought – two words pop into my head out of nowhere:
Pole…….
Smoker…..
…….I have no idea what that is…..and to think with the Olympics over now and everything……
grtflmark on September 25, 2008 at 9:30 PM
I’m a Poor Conservative Republican, i’m against the “$700Billion bailout”, I believe a “Smaller Bailout” with Huge Corporate Tax Cuts, and Capital gains tax cuts(AT the same time) and ALL in Energy Policy(Including ANWR, Implemented immediately) could do just as much IF not more to fix the problems now, and would do more in the long run to increase growth, jobs, and revenues.
Also then, obviously make it so the No Income, No asset Loans go away OR make it so that THAT RISK IS WELL KNOWN.(And some kind of oversight on it)
Chakra Hammer on September 25, 2008 at 9:30 PM
I became a Levin fan when he was a regular pundit on cable news during the Lewinsky mess. He is nothing if not loyal to Limbaugh and Hannity. In that Ted Baxter article, Rush was quoted as being dismissive of Hannity’s success, but I think Limbaugh clarified that comment on his show.
About three weeks ago Levin was on Hannity’s radio show and forced Sean to admit that the McCain campaign sent him a list of prospective veep candidates for feedback — and Palin was on that list, of course. No doubt O’Reilly is plenty envious.
Terrie on September 25, 2008 at 9:31 PM
Roger Waters on September 25, 2008 at 9:20 PM
Your a mighty arogant prick making such assumptions whilst uh, asking for a bit of slack! Maybe you need your fat pyschopathic wife to trash you within inches of your life!
dmann on September 25, 2008 at 9:31 PM
About time. Said and done.
hestrold on September 25, 2008 at 9:33 PM
Gee roger, if the government stands to make money on this deal, why the hell would we need a bailout in the first place? You might want to actually THINK before you type anything else. Thanks for playing.
runawayyyy on September 25, 2008 at 9:33 PM
Levin is the man. His only weakness is letting dog callers talk too much.
MarcusBrody on September 25, 2008 at 9:35 PM
From a purely political POV, if the Republicans blow up this deal and force something lesser through and the economy collapses, Republicans will be ousted for another couple of generations. The risks are enormous. If they are right and it works they’ll be heros for a few months.
TheBigOldDog on September 25, 2008 at 9:36 PM
marklevinshow.com puts up each day’s show within an hour or so. Today’s is up.
O’Reilly’s a real man of the people, huh?
Jim Treacher on September 25, 2008 at 9:37 PM
Levin’s got the Pesci thing goin’ on.
James OK on September 25, 2008 at 9:40 PM
Why is THIS specific deal the only one being considered. WE may need A Deal but this one is a turd. How hard is it to come up with one that doesnt SUCK.
America1st on September 25, 2008 at 9:40 PM
Either way the Republicans will be Blamed for it, George Bush is the President!
Get it right.
Chakra Hammer on September 25, 2008 at 9:41 PM
I have watched The Factor for years and I still don’t know his ideology. I’ve suspected he is a libertarian, but he is also liberal on so many issues.
What I am convinced of his that he is all about the $$$. He also knows that his audience is largely conservative but that increasingly doesn’t matter to him.
His “tough” interview with Obama was not tough at all. He doesn’t do really tough interviews with the bigs (Bush, Cheney, Clinton, Obama, etc.) cause he wants their return business.
He is motivated primarily by his ratings. Obviously that is what rings the cash register.
Captain America on September 25, 2008 at 9:42 PM
One of my most favorite actors! Joe Pesci
(My Cousin Vinny) CLASSIC!
Chakra Hammer on September 25, 2008 at 9:43 PM
I sent Bill O an email last night, wish I had heard this first…
d1carter on September 25, 2008 at 9:43 PM
UUUUGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH!
I’m probably O’Reillys last defender,but the koolaid
drinking and smacking around fellow Conservatives,
is the icing on zee cake!!!!
O’Reilly has lost it!
Say what you will about talk radio,but Rush,Shaun and
Levin are in the political trenches day in and day out,
fighten the good fight on Republican Conservative issues!!
canopfor on September 25, 2008 at 9:47 PM
He has a place in his heart for dogs ever since Sprite died.
ManlyRash on September 25, 2008 at 9:48 PM
O’Reilly was playing patty cake with Obama!
Sheesh, wheres are the Rezko stuff?
Obama’s a sell out!
Rezko didn’t heat the buildings during the winter of 1997 that the poor people were living in, in Obama’s own district and Obama still kept taking money from him and continued to do so, forever he never severed ties with him or exposed his corruption!
Then Obama did a land and House deal with Rezko AFTER he was brought up on Charges! WTF!
Chakra Hammer on September 25, 2008 at 9:48 PM
I just started listening to Mark again a couple weeks back. I have gotten over his nonsense about blaming the Republicans midterm loss on conservatives who stayed home. He sounds glorious.
V15J on September 25, 2008 at 9:48 PM
O’Reilly was playing patty cake with Obama!
Sheesh, wheres are the Rezko stuff?
Obama’s a sell out!
Rezko didn’t heat the buildings during the winter of 1997 that the poor people were living in, in Obama’s own district and Obama still kept taking money from him and continued to do so, forever he never severed ties with him or exposed his corruption!
Then Obama did a land and House deal with Rezko AFTER he was brought up on Charges!
Chakra Hammer on September 25, 2008 at 9:49 PM
Have you ever seen O-Reilly and Shep in the same room?
I’m just sayin’
Elizabetty on September 25, 2008 at 9:49 PM
This is nothing to celebrate.
I am no fan of Bill O’Reilly. He is not a conservative but a populist. And O’Reilly is wrong to blame this on Bush (but again, O’Reilly is not a conservative so what do you expect).
That much said, I am concerned about the markets going south. And that could definitely happen. Hyperbole, perhaps. But we are taking a huge chance here. I am all for going more carefully and working this deal out, but I am very worried if Obama and the Dems take over. If things melt down those idiots will mimic FDR and will drive us into a depression.
Mr. Joe on September 25, 2008 at 9:49 PM
Mark Levin is our Tyler Durden……… he serves a purpose.
For my part, and the majority of my friends, we are not the “inside the beltway government elitist main stream media, bureaucratic political class that get paid way too much for mediocre and incompetent work that affect the rest of our lives through their social engineering…………
……….. we are basically pissed of an tired of it. And now, Bill O’ objects to Rush and others actually pointing out how we got here and who is to blame?
Are you kidding me?
This is only the beginning. Thank GOD for the House Republicans and John McCain. The “fix” was stopped, time to have some accountability………..
Seven Percent Solution on September 25, 2008 at 9:52 PM
Someone’s goignt to get a talking to from the talking points memo.
Oh noes!
Billy Boy cn has vuership? No.
VolMagic on September 25, 2008 at 9:53 PM
I heard this live and it is still brilliant. There’s a reason why he is called The Great One.
powerpro on September 25, 2008 at 9:53 PM
I was born and raised in a populist third world country and I prefer 1000 times more to live in a free-market society, under a bridge, but FREE.
Ropera on September 25, 2008 at 9:53 PM
I won’t like any of it until I see Barney turning dino purple in rage. If I know he hates it, my wallet is as protected as it is going to get. Do a deal that the demagogue left doesn’t think goes far enough, and I’ll exhale a little.
rhodeymark on September 25, 2008 at 9:59 PM
Nice!
Oh BTW Bill O’reily, Bush has been trying to fix Clinton’s F Ups since he took office. Think about it before you open the idiot hole below your nose again.
jdsmith0021 on September 25, 2008 at 9:59 PM
Oh BURN! I can almost smell the scorch! haha
RushBaby on September 25, 2008 at 10:03 PM
You’ve got to be kidding. Because of him, we adopted a poor old crippled neighborhood dog a couple of years ago, and I just got two Ike refugee pound pups. Never was a dog person until I started listening to Levin.
RushBaby on September 25, 2008 at 10:06 PM
Dogs are the best. I could never understand why Limbaugh got a cat. A CAT. Let’s face it, cats are for spinsters and embittered old lesbians.
ManlyRash on September 25, 2008 at 10:09 PM
O’Reilly gets pwned by Cavuto and Levin in the space of a week or two! Perhaps BO ought to leave economics to those more knowledgeable. (I think Cavuto’s pwnage was better because of the amount of usable content and because of the look on his face while delivering a schooling.)
baldilocks on September 25, 2008 at 10:10 PM
Speaking of talking out an opening other than your mouth, ’splain this:
Total mortgage debt end of 2007 was 7.1 trillion and these bailouts total 1 trillion. I hate to inform you but, there is NOWHERE NEAR 1 in 7 mortgages in or facing foreclosure. Oh, I see! Maybe it’s just the really really really really rich people not paying so it’s only the really really really big mortgages that are being bought.
Paulson’s deal is trash. Add in Schumer’s requirement that those being foreclosed be allowed to have the courts modify their mortgage (balance and interest) and we have now tossed contract law right out the window…. And unless they want to let me go decide what my mortgage balance is and what I have to pay, then they fail the constitutional test of equal treatment. Oh, unless they want to buy out EVERYONE’s risky debt of all kinds, they also violate the constitution. They might make loans… that’s doable. The cannot buy any without buying all.
CC
CapedConservative on September 25, 2008 at 10:14 PM
You can’t make me mad at you, ManlyRash. I like you too much.
RushBaby on September 25, 2008 at 10:16 PM
Hey! I have a cat! As a matter of fact, I have more than one cat! Whaaaaaaaaa! Foul! I’m gonna tell Allah!
Wait… my cat just hissed at me and got off my lap…. never mind.
CC
CapedConservative on September 25, 2008 at 10:18 PM
Mark Levin is the man!
keepinitreal on September 25, 2008 at 10:21 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »