But beware the October surprise.

There are now hints that the McCain campaign is preparing to hit Democratic Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama on his Reverend Wright association (right in the middle of a growing national political debate over the biggest financial crisis Americ…

Obama says he’s a citizen of the world. mollymack on September 21, 2008 at 10:25 AM

Fine he can go be the president of the world. He just can’t be America’s president.

His true vulnerability is in being a major cog in the Democrat’s NO ENERGY PARTY.

They are obstructionists forcing Americans into paying absurd amounts for the vital natural resources that the DEMS have blocked us from tapping in the U.S.

Hit Barry where people hurt- energy costs- and creepy sidelight cranks like Wright, etc., will just be malignant icing on the cake of Obama’s undoing.

NightmareOnKStreet on September 21, 2008 at 5:28 AM

And the people most likely to blackmail him are those of his own party who are in power in the congress.

Don’t be a propaganda tool. Obama didnt’ support ‘talking sex with 5 year olds’. He supported a program to teach kids how to react when approached or touched in certain ways. If children aren’t taught how to respond to predatory behavior, they are completely exposed and vulnerable to predators. Many people in Illinois want to stop child molestation.

bayam on September 20, 2008 at 12:58 PM

Besides the molestation part of the bill, it ALSO included age appropriate sex education for kindergartners.

It is despicable for Oslime-a to presume that parents want schools teaching that kind of stuff to their children. There was an opt-out clause, but just the attempt to put themselves in that position is social engineering at it’s worse.

The funny thing is that in a few short years (5th and 6th grade), those children would be getting educated on the virtues of homosexuality. And Oslime-a would be pushing that bill too.

Oslime-a is an elitist sack of crap and is pushing his socialist agenda on his constituents.

Obama and his wife with their own words would make a big impact on most Americans who truly love this country.

I wish someone would pin Obama down on why he thinks we need that 500,000 civilian force.

Who will he put on that force, and for what purpose.

I don’t believe it will be 500,000 community organizers.

It could be eye opening.

*

By the way, why was it so important for Obama to hide “Frank’s” true identity in Obama’s book? Obama is not only bi, but more importantly, very dangerous to our republic.

Southern Gent, you’re saying BHO is on the down low?
NightmareOnKStreet on September 20, 2008 at 1:24 AM

Yes, I get that distinct impression. Not that there’s anything wrong with that to me. It’s his policy positions that irk me. ;)

SouthernGent on September 20, 2008 at 8:13PM

NOTHING WRONG WITH IT????????????? Before we conflate the two issues, I agree there’s NOTHING WRONG with being gay. BUT SGWM (Secretly Gay While Married) is a very different story. That’s unfair to one’s spouse to say the least. And if you’re married to Michelle Obama \\*flashback to Lorena Bobbit*// If it is true someone should “out” him because to be SGWM&POTUS Secretly Gay While Married & President of the U.S. opens the door to blackmail which would be a huge threat to our national security. Not to mention how much I’d LOVE to see how Ms-If-You-Can’t-Run-Your-Own-House-You-Certainly-Can’t-Run-The-White-House would handle the news. (I’ve always thought that remark was her way of telling her husband to clean up his act or she’d spill the beans on his infidelities.) Remember the interview she gave to Glamour Magazine a year ago? Speaking of her girls, she said, “We have this ritual in the morning. They come in my bed, and Dad isn’t there—because he’s too snore-y and stinky, they don’t want to ever get into bed with him.” After people picked up on it,and started wondering if they slept in separate beds, Glamour went back and added the word “if” (and if Dad isn’t there) to its online article. Nothing about him would surprise me, he seems to be without conscience just like Bill Clinton. No core, no conscience. Gay or straight, I just want a president with some integrity.

The other kicker is that Obama’s women staff that are paid are recompensed far less than the men. On the other hand, McCain’s women staff salaries proportionately exceed those of the men.

That’s a very legitimate and good point. In that aspect, McCain has set an example that Obama can’t touch.

Southern Gent, you’re saying BHO is on the down low?

NightmareOnKStreet on September 20, 2008 at 1:24 AM

Yes, I get that distinct impression. Not that there’s anything wrong with that to me. It’s his policy positions that irk me. ;)

If it could be slipped in, the voice-over in such ads should also ask, “Why are the media so incurious about these questions of Obama’s fitness for the presidency?”

So what’s this on Drudge about Obama in Florida attacking McCain’s policy on women?

maverickmuse: Several weeks ago, our morning talk show host,Jim Quinn, had a whole feature on the size of senatorial Obama’s staff, paid and unpaid. Given that Obama has little legislation to show for that team, the excess is laughable in itself. His staff far exceeds McCain’s, yet McCain serves on several significant committees.

The other kicker is that Obama’s women staff that are paid are recompensed far less than the men. On the other hand, McCain’s women staff salaries proportionately exceed those of the men.

I wish that I knew the source of the information that Quinn (and Rose) were citing, but I was driving at the time that tidbit was airing and didn’t pay attention to their intro.

What an amazing piece of fiction this is. You give the Dems the blame but fail to give your own party blame as well. Mr. Unregulate-Everything McCain has a track record you might want to look into. Or more likely, not want to look into.

Dave Rywall on September 20, 2008 at 1:23 PM

its the truth davey-boy. you’re lying about mccain. he’s a big guv kinda guy. seriously you libs have to lie about everything. its laughable.