What happens when the Democrats’ digital brownshirts get political political power? The same thing that always happens when brownshirts get political power: Sources say the axes were out for Palin as soon as Sen. Clinton pulled out because she……

Campaigns compete in the Twin Cities. McCain-Palin (video here) outdraws the other guys. (Meanwhile, a moose is loose in Fargo. Is it crossing into swing-state territory to that other twin city, Moorhead?):……

Will you all read what I put on there concerning 501(c)3’s. Anyone who is a 501c3, is liable and can lose their tax exempt status. Religious Institution or just a small group for Medical or Veterans.

Upinak: I have read the relevant section(s) of 501(c) 3 as they pertain to loss of tax-exempt status for political activities: As you correctly point out here is the type of activity which is prohibited:

1. Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.

2. On the other hand, voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention.

Question – Do you consider scenario # 1 above to be applicable; if so, how so? Same questions for scenario #2

why is it that the left always goes more left in the common knowledge tha th u.s. is not socialist. any one who thinks hiler was right wing is stupid. he was in fact a hate monger to control the peopel of hsi nation.

even thogh hitler killed 6 million people

More on the shameful episode: Phyllis Chesler writes: Hillary vs. Sarah, America vs. Iran, and the Film About Stonings in Iran That Ahmadinejad Needs To See The plot thickens but there is a bottom line; there always is. Obama is……

If terrorists get a nuke, NO OTHER ISSUE MATTERS. Not taxes, not health care, not the economy, NOTHING. One nuke and everything goes to hell.

If ever there existed a non-partisan issue… AARRGHHHH!!!! If this issue isn’t non-partisan, I give up.

A: The Democrats can’t intimidate Ahmadinejad.

She should show up *WITH JOE LIEBERMAN* in a show of bipartisan support for the rally.

And she should not mention Hillary or the Obama campaign AT ALL. Not a single word or insinuation.

Message: Real Bipartisanship (vs. Talking about it)

Like the “raus mit us” Jewish community leaders in the early days of Nazi Germany, the Jewish leadership believes prostrating themselves in front of anti-Semites will save the community from harm. Jews in America today are even more naive (some would day stupid) then German community in 1933. When Iran destroys Israel under an Obama administration they will become more anti-Semitic not less. Obama and his communist friends understand that as long as there are Jews to write about it History will record Obama’s role in the second Holocaust. They will not let that happen.

To get biblical today’s Jewish community is no different then the Israel of the books of Kings. Instead of worshiping the Ba’al they worship at the temple of Marx. Both lead to death and destruction

He even spoke of what he would do as President – a clear violation of IRS rules.

He got a pass.

This year I was thrilled to be able to be there with Sarah Palin.

But now forget it.

I don’t know how many times I read at the NJDC website that support for Israel is bipartisan. But that’s been the mantra there. If anyone had temerity to criticize Democrats for their lack of commitment on Israel, that’s the cliche that NJDC would t…

McCain had an invitation on his website to Obama to come in Clinton’s place:

Instead of pressuring Senator Clinton to withdraw and pressuring the event’s organizers to disinvite Governor Palin, we hope Senator Obama will consider lending his own voice to this cause. And if Senator subsequently wishes to clarify any remarks that might be misconstrued, he will have the opportunity to meet with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad without preconditions after he speaks at the UN the folllowing day.

“he will have the opportunity to meet with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad without preconditions”

Is it possible that the McCain camp couldn’t resist a dig at Obama and hinting at his promise to meet Ahmadinejad “without preconditions” and thus guaranteed this problem would not be resolved?