Pop Quiz: Guess the Presidential Adviser
posted at 12:00 pm on September 18, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
All right, class. Everyone put away their books and their Google searches. I want to test you to see whether you’ve been paying attention, and whether you’re properly prepared for your November 4th examinations. Today’s subject is economics — stop playing with that GameBoy, Cannonball! – and your assignment is to identify the presidential adviser who wrote these analyses of the subprime lending that has crashed the credit sector.
Anyone who fails this has to stay afterwards and help form and then ridicule commissions. Ready?
- March 29, 2007, New York Times: “[The Center for Responsible Lending] estimated that in 2005, a majority of home loans to African-Americans and 40 percent of home loans to Hispanics were subprime loans. The existence and spread of subprime lending helps explain the drastic growth of homeownership for these same groups. Since 1995, for example, the number of African-American households has risen by about 20 percent, but the number of African-American homeowners has risen almost twice that rate, by about 35 percent. For Hispanics, the number of households is up about 45 percent and the number of homeowning households is up by almost 70 percent.”And do not forget that the vast majority of even subprime borrowers have been making their payments. Indeed, fewer than 15 percent of borrowers in this most risky group have even been delinquent on a payment, much less defaulted. When contemplating ways to prevent excessive mortgages for the 13 percent of subprime borrowers whose loans go sour, regulators must be careful that they do not wreck the ability of the other 87 percent to obtain mortgages.”
- September 23, 2007, Slate: “If you want to make money off the housing bubble, you’ll have to do it the old-fashioned way: Buy a place with a no-money-down mortgage and then flip it.”
- September 23, 2007, New York Times: “[P]eople who refuse to sell their houses for less than they paid for them are violating a cardinal rule of the market: stuff is worth what it’s worth. It doesn’t matter what you paid for it…”(B)y being hung up about whether your condominium will sell for what you paid for it, you aren’t just driving yourself crazy trying to get a buyer. You may be threatening the very performance of the economy and driving up the unemployment rate — provided that many others behave in a similar way.”
So who wrote these defenses of the subprime market and the advice that people have to handle their own losses? Oh, let’s not always have the same hands ….
The answer, as Jake Tapper notes, is Austan Goolsbee — presidential adviser on economics to Barack Obama. This should come as no shock, class. After all, had you paid attention to your lessons over this term, you’d already know that Obama has Franklin Raines as one of his advisers, the former CEO of Fannie Mae who had to return some of the money he made by overstating Fannie Mae’s earnings. Obama also had James Johnson as an adviser, who chaired Fannie Mae and hid up to $19 million of his compensation package from regulators during his tenure — until the Fannie Mae connection got too embarrassing for Obama.
Your essay question, class, is this: Which presidential campaign represents change and reform on economic policy, and which represents more of the same?
Extra credit: Write a 100-word essay on the previous Obama double-talk scandal in which Goolsbee was involved.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Is this the poison pill for Obacko, can Mac hammer his ass into the ground at the debates with it?
Will the media do what’s proper and widely report this?
Bishop on September 18, 2008 at 12:03 PM
Ed,
I got 100 on my test.
L
letget on September 18, 2008 at 12:03 PM
And therein lies the response (via advertising and public pronouncements) to the Prince of Peace’s 2-minute commercial about how he’s going to fix the economy.
DO IT NOW, MCCAIN!
D2Boston on September 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM
OOOH OOOOH OOOOH Mr. Kotter! I know the answer!
Facts are irrelevant! Bush was president, ergo, it’s his fault.
It’s easy to be a lib!
/Sarc?
redshirt on September 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM
er, Ed. We can’t do this because someone will say it’s “raaaaaaacist.”
Cody1991 on September 18, 2008 at 12:05 PM
Ah! I thought I recognized that name…
Tengripundit on September 18, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Bishop:
The media will do the job their DNC masters tell them to do and bury this like a dog buries a bone.
TABoLK on September 18, 2008 at 12:06 PM
I did not pass the test.
However I will say Obama is more of the same, seeing as his group is made up of “more of the same”.
No extra credit, because anything that can’t fit on a bumper sticker the liberals won’t understand.
right2bright on September 18, 2008 at 12:06 PM
But it all sounds so reasonable, how can it be wrong?
Getting minority home ownership up is a good thing, right?
Why are all those mortgage derivatives worthless when more than 80% are generating cash flow?
Is this not true?
rockhauler on September 18, 2008 at 12:07 PM
Gameboy??? I’ve upgraded to a Wii, thank you very much. ;-)
cannonball on September 18, 2008 at 12:07 PM
“Obama also had James Johnson as an adviser, who chaired Fannie Mae and hid up to $19 million of his compensation package from regulators during his tenure”
So, are these “bonuses” like reparations?
Just wondering.
Cody1991 on September 18, 2008 at 12:08 PM
a Denver Professor has assigned his class to write an essay critical of Palin for class
jp on September 18, 2008 at 12:08 PM
Extra credit: Green Eggs and Ham?
Limerick on September 18, 2008 at 12:08 PM
We all know, unfortunately, the answer.
right2bright on September 18, 2008 at 12:08 PM
do i have to use propper speling punkuashun adn granma to pass this test Mr. Ed??? Do I gotta indent? first and last name on the paper? (these are common questions from my students)
robblefarian on September 18, 2008 at 12:09 PM
I’m going to ask AGAIN:
Why is McCain not going at this with a vengance ASAP?
WTF?
And if anybody is going to suggest patience, then you better have some damn solid theories to back that up.
FiveWays on September 18, 2008 at 12:09 PM
I passed, sort of. Now is somebody gonna come knock on my door and get up in my face to argue? Or maybe they will hack into my email account.
bloggless on September 18, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Memo to Sarah Palin:
An powerful ad, please.
JudetheFossil on September 18, 2008 at 12:10 PM
That guy Johnson. (I’ve been listening to Levin during my morning walk.)
baldilocks on September 18, 2008 at 12:10 PM
What? No scantron and #2 pencil…what kind of test is this?
Cannonball? Are you dragging around a generator for your Wii. Have not see the portable Wii yet. ;-)
~B
Brian on September 18, 2008 at 12:11 PM
hammer Obama on this stuff, the Dems are the real “Big Business” Crooks.
quasi Govt/Private corporations = Liberal Fascism
jp on September 18, 2008 at 12:11 PM
One Hundred word essay,piff I say!
I’ll repeat Hopey and Changey 50 times,haha!:)
canopfor on September 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM
You know? That’s how I think it will eventually be justified.
baldilocks on September 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Tapper is really doing his homework. I’m impressed. This is damaging. Good piece, Ed!
Connie on September 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM
O/T Rush is on a roll on Obama’s lying!
canopfor on September 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM
You know? That’s how I think it will eventually be justified.
baldilocks on September 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Bingo! There are all kinds of ways to exact “reparations”. Ask Jesse! ;)
Cody1991 on September 18, 2008 at 12:14 PM
13 percent failure rate? For subprime loans? Since 2005?
And this guy said that’s not a problem – all lenders need to do is look in a crystal ball to tell which of the people currently unable to afford the payments will be doing better in the future?
How in the Hell did these people stay in business as long as they did? Polyanas are saying that all it will take is a quick two trillion dollars and the problem will be all cleared up. Bull; what we’ve seen so far is the tip of the iceburg. If this much is on the surface, there’s a gigantic rat’s nest underneath.
logis on September 18, 2008 at 12:15 PM
I love how Pelosi was stomping around the Capital yesterday proclaiming in her usual shrill voice “DON’T BLAME US! IT’S BUSH’S FAULT! WE WILL INVESTIGATE! WE WILL GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS!”
Then the Congress gets ready to adjourn.
So much for getting to the bottom of things. Only thing at the bottom right now is the Congress….as in the bottom of the barrel.
pilamaye on September 18, 2008 at 12:15 PM
He is a freaking University of Chicago expert!!!! LOL!
bloggless on September 18, 2008 at 12:16 PM
These facts should at least be all over the GOP web site.
Too bad Obama hasn’t been asked these questions by, you know, a populist bloviator who interviewed him recently.
Akzed on September 18, 2008 at 12:16 PM
McCain’s camp really needs to do a commercial on FM/FM. He needs to point out that he sponsored legislation in the Senate to reign in the abuses there in 2005, while Obama did nothing. He needs to point out that Obama was the second largest recipient of FM/FM lobbying money, second only to Chris Dodd, chair of the Banking Committee. And he also needs to point out how many of the FM/FM frauds are now acting as Obama campaign officials/advisors. Then they need to play that ad in all the major markets, for the next week or so.
AZCoyote on September 18, 2008 at 12:17 PM
I swear to God, if McCain isnt ahead by 10 come Monday, its over.
Everyday we find some new tie this idiot has to some dult who was involved with this financial mess. And they are his economic advisors.
Where is the MSM on all this? This is so brutal, what the media is not reporting on Obama.
TheHat on September 18, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Isn’t this the same Austan Goolsbee who while on a trip visiting with Canadian officials assured them NAFTA would not be re-negotiated?
That Obama was merely doing a nod and a wink to a blind horse…the unions
theblacksheepwasright on September 18, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Again, like the point about McCain being out in front of the Fannie/Freddie mess and making efforts to avert it, why isn’t McCain & campaign hammering this point home?
thirteen28 on September 18, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Wow, flashbacks to my school days… gulping, sweating etc. Lucky I scored 100 on this one. *exhales* Seriously though, why is this guy back leading in the polls?
Hunt035 on September 18, 2008 at 12:19 PM
The one is the many
EricPWJohnson on September 18, 2008 at 12:19 PM
I hate school.
NotCoach on September 18, 2008 at 12:20 PM
I hope everybody here understands that the Obama campaign probably has at least one Keating Five ad teed up for whenever the McCain campaign decides to go after his associates’ ties to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Keep that in mind when you root for McCain to go after Obama on his campaign members’ corruption.
Big S on September 18, 2008 at 12:20 PM
I’ve thought that the Obama campaign is intent on losing so that Dems can continue to j’accuse and make noise from the moral high ground without dealing with the responsibilities of leading the country. But I think they might actually be trying to win, so that they can cover up their sins.
McCain has an economic team which knows business.
Obama has an economic team which fails business.
Obama wants us to ‘fear’ big business for being soulless corporations that chew up and keep down the little man.
So why does the community organizer HAVE an economic team?
Would he listen to them or would they have to listen to him?
Would Obama’s economic team have a veto over Obama’s disastrous ideas? Inquiring minds want to know.
Doug on September 18, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Just some friends from the ‘hood?
d1carter on September 18, 2008 at 12:21 PM
In class?
MarkTheGreat on September 18, 2008 at 12:21 PM
Yep, you read it right. Subprime lending was just great…until it wasn’t. Fannie and Freddie were wonderful institutions promoting the American dream of homeownership…until they weren’t.
rockmom on September 18, 2008 at 12:22 PM
“How in the Hell did these people stay in business as long as they did? Polyanas are saying that all it will take is a quick two trillion dollars and the problem will be all cleared up. Bull; what we’ve seen so far is the tip of the iceburg. If this much is on the surface, there’s a gigantic rat’s nest underneath.”
logis on September 18, 2008 at 12:15 PM
It’s amazing that this crisis did not occur sooner, imo. I worked in the mortgage business for years. During the 1990’s sub-prime lenders were popping up all over the place. When they would bundle their loans and try to sell them they often found that they could not. Underwriting guidelines would be altered, and then they would change again. It was maddening, but it was also frightening.
Many of these companies were founded by sharp guys who found that niche – a market for garbage. They made fortunes, too. And now taxpayers are paying the price.
Glad I got out. It was sickening.
Cody1991 on September 18, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Isn’t there a cable show called “Flip That House?”
Wonder how that’s doing.
Connie on September 18, 2008 at 12:26 PM
BJ Clinton, The Community Reinvestment Act, ACORN, Obama.
Those are the dots.
MSM. Why don’t you connect them?
BowHuntingTexas on September 18, 2008 at 12:26 PM
The problem is that it has to be turned into a 30 second soundbite so the undecideds (?) can grasp it.
pugwriter on September 18, 2008 at 12:27 PM
Austan Goolsbee, Franklin Raines, now all he needs to add is Jamie Gorelick (I pronounce it gore-lick in honor of her servicing the Goracle) and Urkel has hit the trifecta!
That’s if he hasn’t already added
herit.Brass Pair on September 18, 2008 at 12:28 PM
Ooh Ooh Ooh! And guess who was #3 in campaign contributions from Fanny and Freddy executives over the past decade, even though he’s only been in the Senate for 3+ years.
rbj on September 18, 2008 at 12:29 PM
The One is omnipresent, and omnipotent, and can say/do anything. The idiots will believe. Biggest among them, and crushed the hardest in Nov., the media.
Entelechy on September 18, 2008 at 12:30 PM
The problem is that it has to be turned into a 30 second soundbite so the undecideds (?) can grasp it.
pugwriter on September 18, 2008 at 12:27 PM
All that’s necessary is to flash pictures of the principles, their bonuses and reference the amount of contributions to Obama and the ultimate amount of the cost to taxpayers for this failure. It’s a bigger scandal than Enron.
Cody1991 on September 18, 2008 at 12:31 PM
Household Name Death Match: Ken Lay vs. Jim Johnson
Natalie on September 18, 2008 at 12:31 PM
This is so fustrating, I’m getting to the point where I may have to just step away from politics. In this day and age of media overload, we still can’t get anything made public about this criminal. Depressing.
anniekc on September 18, 2008 at 12:36 PM
McCain is hammering Obama again on Fannie and Freddie right now. You all need to chillax about this. Campaigns are more than what is in TV ads.
rockmom on September 18, 2008 at 12:36 PM
I’m sorry, I failed the test, but then, I’m not running for POTUS or VPOTUS. ;-) Get ads out now! Hypocrites.
kirkill on September 18, 2008 at 12:37 PM
and it’s “frustrating” too
anniekc on September 18, 2008 at 12:37 PM
a 100-word essay —Obama hates NAFTA too.
There! Where’s my credits?
Rovin on September 18, 2008 at 12:37 PM
12:30 Eastern:
Picture this: Senator McCain, BIG knife in hand. Senator Obama, throat fully exposed. Senator McCain, doing what we have been begging for.
He is RIPPING Obama. All the various points that we have said that he should say or should be in an ad… well, his speech writer must have been lurking around HA.
CC
CapedConservative on September 18, 2008 at 12:38 PM
The problem is that the national media are not reporting this, or anything else that could burst Obama’s bubble, so McCain/Palin and their supporters are forced to inform the voting public of the most basic and essential facts that we need to know.
Loxodonta on September 18, 2008 at 12:38 PM
Just listening to Palin and McCain live in Iowa;
FINALLY! They’re punching Obama right square in the damn face! They’re going after the role the Dems played in Fannie/Mac and they’re calling out Obama’s advisors Johnson and Raines!
Go Maverick! Pound these bastards!
FiveWays on September 18, 2008 at 12:42 PM
I was told there would be no
mathradioactive Obama campaign relationships on this test.Cuffy Meigs on September 18, 2008 at 12:43 PM
McCain just stammered trough a pretty good attack on BO about Fannie and Freddie.
Todd Palin was in the most prominent spot behind him on stage – not bad.
Now a moonbat flipped out and disrupted the speech. That kind of crap will do nothing but help McCain: “Americans want us to stop yelling at each other” “if they want to yell, tell them to yell at him (Obama) and we can stand together at these town halls”
forest on September 18, 2008 at 12:43 PM
Just another item not being discussed in the MSM. Even before McCain announced Palin I felt we had a shot at winning. I’m starting to doubt it. The media is just not reporting the most negative Obama stories. I hate to say Americans are stupid but let’s face it, most don’t pay as much attention to politics as us and they are not informed. It’s ironic how information is so easily obtained these days but people are still ignorant of Obama’s negatives. This Iraq policy story should be all over the news! I know how you feel Eeyore.
kongzilla on September 18, 2008 at 12:43 PM
God that was great!
An Obama heckler in the crowd and McCain goes off the cuff and calls Obama out on his refusal to have townhall debates!
THAT, MY FRIENDS WAS A GOOD-OLE FASHIONED THROW-DOWN!
Maverick brought one from the floor!
FiveWays on September 18, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Don’t forget Jamie Gorelick.
moxie_neanderthal on September 18, 2008 at 12:47 PM
Both McCain and Palin gave really good speeches. New stuff from both.
Connie on September 18, 2008 at 12:48 PM
Ed will have to give me an Incomplete on this assignment.
Yeah, Obama hangs with the wrong crowd. But frankly, he could have the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost as his advisors and I still wouldn’t vote for him. He’s too arrogant and hell-bent on socialism to listen to anyone.
I think McCain-Palin should focus on their core beliefs – low taxes, job creation, government reform, and reducing spending – and not engage a ‘guilt by association’ message. Too much negativity will suppress voter turnout imho.
Y-not on September 18, 2008 at 12:48 PM
I was wanting Mcain/Palin to get agressive- but Damn!
This was a body blow to Obama-boy!
FiveWays on September 18, 2008 at 12:49 PM
Can I just do Biden and copy/paste one of yours?
Stephen Macklin on September 18, 2008 at 12:54 PM
The campaign could be saving some of this stuff to drop at the debates. Has Obama responded to whether or not he thinks the AIG bailout was the correct move? Shep was trying to get Obama surrogates to answer the question yesterday. McCain could mention in one of the debates that Obama has yet to make a decision after a few weeks and put him on the spot to answer in the middle of the debate.
Obama has not mentioned the Keating Five yet, but has McCain brought up Obama’s call to make the assault weapons ban permanent?
rw on September 18, 2008 at 12:54 PM
If you wanted to make a movie about politics and wanted it mainly to be about how the media wielded great power to persuade and convince the country to do whatever they wanted through lies, ridiculously slanted coverage and just flat out ignoring anything that damages their anointed savior, it would be pretty easy. you could just accurately describe the current state of mainstream media. i don’t know if anyone would believe something like that could ever happen in real life but thats kinda exactly the point i guess.
hump1201 on September 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM
Not that I know of. The last I heard BO was calling for “restraint from both sides” was thinking of voting “present” on the issue.
forest on September 18, 2008 at 12:56 PM
McCain needs to square off against Obama and put Johnson,Goolsbee and Raines in the line of fire.
It is predictable that Obama will have to throw three more bodies under the bus.
The McCain camp should make the growing body count a line of attack against Obama’s center of gravity (character & judgment).
moxie_neanderthal on September 18, 2008 at 1:05 PM
Somehow the meme of hope-n-change gets lost when you tell people to argue and get in people’s faces. I think we’ve jumped the shark.
moxie_neanderthal on September 18, 2008 at 1:05 PM
There is more with Obama:
Guess who is Number 2 in getting Campaign contributions from Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac employees?
Obama.
(Nr. 1 is Senator Dodd, Obama confidant.)
————
Penny Pritzker, Obama’s national finance chair was partially responsible for one of the greater banking collapses in American history.
Penny Pritzker, Obama’s national finance chair was, with her family, the half owner of Superior Bank, which was shut down in 2001 by the FDIC after it had lost nearly all of its more than $2 billion of assets on bad loans to high-risk borrowers, federal regulators said.
Pritzker also served as finance chair for Obama’s Senate run, and supported him during his time in the Illinois state legislature.
One reason Pritzker may have been enamored with Obama was his willingness to press legislation that loosened state regulatory policies for land developers and multi-family property owners.
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13897
albill on September 18, 2008 at 1:08 PM
…let’s see….
* Lending institutions created by the federal government…
* Led by guys hip-deep in Clintonism…
* The overhead and foot-soldiers of whom give to Obama’s campaign 3-to-1 over McCain’s…
* …and they fail…
* …and the Democrat Congress, the leader of whom admits that they’re running to hide because they don’t know what to do…
* So, Obama blames McCain by tying him to Bush…whose “fault” it is…”entirely”….
…I’m no economic genius (as my resume will attest), but up until that last, we were hip-deep in party-line Leftist Democrats. Now, they’re on Obama’s staff? And the campaign numbers are close?
At what point did this nation pass through the looking glass?
Puritan1648 on September 18, 2008 at 1:08 PM
Ed, isn’t time you write commercials for McCain…?
CliffHanger on September 18, 2008 at 1:19 PM
Announcement from John McCain regarding his next pick? In a recent interview he named her as one of the 3 people he looked up to. And now…
Meg Whitman retires from Ebay
NightmareOnKStreet on September 18, 2008 at 1:23 PM
Why doesn’t the teacher EVER call on me?
saved on September 18, 2008 at 1:37 PM
I’m not taking your racist test Ed cause you’re just another ‘greedy beneficiary of the 80’s”.
:)
Sapwolf on September 18, 2008 at 1:46 PM
I’m confused ed, are you saying that people aren’t responsible for buying homes that they couldn’t afford?
viahj on September 18, 2008 at 1:54 PM
There is also this.
McCain team includes 83 Wall Street lobbyists
Didn’t find that in the MSM. They must be biased towards McSame.
Chimpy on September 18, 2008 at 4:52 PM
Comment pages: