<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread: Palin on &#8220;Hannity &amp; Colmes&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:11:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sapwolf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-7/#comment-1434989</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1434989</guid>
		<description>Perfect example of BOR SPINNING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect example of BOR SPINNING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linlithgow</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-7/#comment-1434820</link>
		<dc:creator>linlithgow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1434820</guid>
		<description>We watched it last night.

Palin had some good moments; she seems genuine and bright. Overall, I think the interview was a good one.

Disappointed that Sean had to steer her to admitting that part of the problem was Freddie/Fannie and not those mean old corporations. This is typical GOP; try to look like you&#039;re not beholden to capitalist institutions, lest the Dems call you a stooge for big business. Instead of being honest and talking about the whole high risk loan mess as well as &#039;corporate greed&#039;, it was ALL corporate greed until Sean brought up Johnson and Obama&#039;s lobby dollars from Freddie and Fannie. I noticed one of the commenters later had trouble explaining Obama&#039;s Fannie lobby money. Ha!

I think they have Palin on a bit of a leash. Really, she should have taken that opportunity to say &quot;You know, we need to have investigations, particularly in light of Sen. McCain trying to reform the system 3 years ago and there was tons of pushback, including some from those who benefited the most from the F/F lobby&quot;. The Dems like to make hay of McCain&#039;s &#039;lobbyist&#039; connections, but I&#039;ve never seen a more egregious and co-ordinated acceptance of corruption than that displayed by Dodd, Frank, et al. Where is that Fed investigation that the WSJ was calling for? 

Really sick and tired of being the party of wimps.

As for someone that makes me sick, the way O&#039;Reilly talked over and bullied Cavuto the other night just reinforced why I don&#039;t watch him. He&#039;s a total fake and didn&#039;t want Cavuto&#039;s points to get out, because O&#039;Reilly would be shown to be WRONG and couldn&#039;t set himself up as champion of the little guy. The fact is oil companies aren&#039;t part of some huge cabal to gouge; I&#039;ve heard figures all over the place about how much money it actually takes for the Saudi&#039;s to pump oil out of the ground, and it usually hovers around a few bucks. By the time they price it up (which everyone knows they do... OPEC is the cabal) and the cost of refinement and shipping (and taxes) is added on, it&#039;s an expensive endeavour. Record profits can come from one of two ways; volume or high prices. The profit margin for &#039;big oil&#039; isn&#039;t egregious, it&#039;s average, so O&#039;Reilly is dead wrong about it being all company greed, but if that&#039;s true then he doesn&#039;t have his shtick.

What a tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We watched it last night.</p>
<p>Palin had some good moments; she seems genuine and bright. Overall, I think the interview was a good one.</p>
<p>Disappointed that Sean had to steer her to admitting that part of the problem was Freddie/Fannie and not those mean old corporations. This is typical GOP; try to look like you&#8217;re not beholden to capitalist institutions, lest the Dems call you a stooge for big business. Instead of being honest and talking about the whole high risk loan mess as well as &#8216;corporate greed&#8217;, it was ALL corporate greed until Sean brought up Johnson and Obama&#8217;s lobby dollars from Freddie and Fannie. I noticed one of the commenters later had trouble explaining Obama&#8217;s Fannie lobby money. Ha!</p>
<p>I think they have Palin on a bit of a leash. Really, she should have taken that opportunity to say &#8220;You know, we need to have investigations, particularly in light of Sen. McCain trying to reform the system 3 years ago and there was tons of pushback, including some from those who benefited the most from the F/F lobby&#8221;. The Dems like to make hay of McCain&#8217;s &#8216;lobbyist&#8217; connections, but I&#8217;ve never seen a more egregious and co-ordinated acceptance of corruption than that displayed by Dodd, Frank, et al. Where is that Fed investigation that the WSJ was calling for? </p>
<p>Really sick and tired of being the party of wimps.</p>
<p>As for someone that makes me sick, the way O&#8217;Reilly talked over and bullied Cavuto the other night just reinforced why I don&#8217;t watch him. He&#8217;s a total fake and didn&#8217;t want Cavuto&#8217;s points to get out, because O&#8217;Reilly would be shown to be WRONG and couldn&#8217;t set himself up as champion of the little guy. The fact is oil companies aren&#8217;t part of some huge cabal to gouge; I&#8217;ve heard figures all over the place about how much money it actually takes for the Saudi&#8217;s to pump oil out of the ground, and it usually hovers around a few bucks. By the time they price it up (which everyone knows they do&#8230; OPEC is the cabal) and the cost of refinement and shipping (and taxes) is added on, it&#8217;s an expensive endeavour. Record profits can come from one of two ways; volume or high prices. The profit margin for &#8216;big oil&#8217; isn&#8217;t egregious, it&#8217;s average, so O&#8217;Reilly is dead wrong about it being all company greed, but if that&#8217;s true then he doesn&#8217;t have his shtick.</p>
<p>What a tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bayam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-7/#comment-1434740</link>
		<dc:creator>bayam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1434740</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Gov. Palin has shown, in short order, she is not afraid of and welcomes the tough problems facing this country. She also shows her leadership by not ducking the tough questions &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, she&#039;s agreed to 2 interviews over a period of over 3 weeks.  Now that&#039;s the kind of bravery and leadership that this country needs.  As for tough questions, in some cases she&#039;s demonstrated candid ignorance.  Only a candidate like George W. can handle a more demanding interview schedule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gov. Palin has shown, in short order, she is not afraid of and welcomes the tough problems facing this country. She also shows her leadership by not ducking the tough questions </p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, she&#8217;s agreed to 2 interviews over a period of over 3 weeks.  Now that&#8217;s the kind of bravery and leadership that this country needs.  As for tough questions, in some cases she&#8217;s demonstrated candid ignorance.  Only a candidate like George W. can handle a more demanding interview schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightwingprof</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-7/#comment-1434519</link>
		<dc:creator>rightwingprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1434519</guid>
		<description>I TiVo&#039;d H&amp;C last week -- don&#039;t remember what it was supposed to be, other than something about Palin -- and when I watched it, remembered why I hate that show so much.

I did not watch this. Until the memory fades, there isn&#039;t enough money in the world for me to put up with that show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I TiVo&#8217;d H&amp;C last week &#8212; don&#8217;t remember what it was supposed to be, other than something about Palin &#8212; and when I watched it, remembered why I hate that show so much.</p>
<p>I did not watch this. Until the memory fades, there isn&#8217;t enough money in the world for me to put up with that show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaintOlaf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-7/#comment-1434446</link>
		<dc:creator>SaintOlaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1434446</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama’s dream is to play Joshua’s trump to tumble down the walls and to bring in vast international investors purchasing gross amounts of American real estate, banks, investment firms and insurance institutions. 

Until mortgages are paid in full, the bank owns title; and who owns the bank, and who owns the insurance company? American stock holders or China, or even Russia? Democrats want a financial crisis so as to destabilize the American population, government and America’s business and political interests internationally.
maverick muse on September 18, 2008 at 1:42 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 

Spot on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Obama’s dream is to play Joshua’s trump to tumble down the walls and to bring in vast international investors purchasing gross amounts of American real estate, banks, investment firms and insurance institutions. </p>
<p>Until mortgages are paid in full, the bank owns title; and who owns the bank, and who owns the insurance company? American stock holders or China, or even Russia? Democrats want a financial crisis so as to destabilize the American population, government and America’s business and political interests internationally.<br />
maverick muse on September 18, 2008 at 1:42 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Spot on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-7/#comment-1434415</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1434415</guid>
		<description>I missed the show last night. Did Hannity ask Palin what her views were on illegal immigration? If so what was her answer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed the show last night. Did Hannity ask Palin what her views were on illegal immigration? If so what was her answer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSGTAS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-7/#comment-1434187</link>
		<dc:creator>MSGTAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1434187</guid>
		<description>Gov. Palin has shown, in short order, she is not afraid of and welcomes the tough problems facing this country.  She also shows her leadership by not ducking the tough questions and uses humor to keep followers from becoming stressed and her detractors off guard.

A good right hand/partner is able to offer solutions without demanding credit and has a sense of what their partner is thinking and has a response available and provides that response when asked, not before.

She also exemplifies her leadership by being a great follower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov. Palin has shown, in short order, she is not afraid of and welcomes the tough problems facing this country.  She also shows her leadership by not ducking the tough questions and uses humor to keep followers from becoming stressed and her detractors off guard.</p>
<p>A good right hand/partner is able to offer solutions without demanding credit and has a sense of what their partner is thinking and has a response available and provides that response when asked, not before.</p>
<p>She also exemplifies her leadership by being a great follower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-7/#comment-1434110</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1434110</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So, what can she do as the vice president to make us more “energy independent”, “more prosperous”, “safer”, etc.? &lt;strong&gt;Send_me&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


&lt;strong&gt;Send_me,&lt;/strong&gt;

Having the full weight of the executive branch behind her gives her power to do a great deal.

If you are not familiar with how the three branches of federal government work, here&#039;s a link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://bensguide.gpo.gov/3-5/government/branches.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Ben&#039;s Guide to the Branches of Government.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

If you find that site a little to simple, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa.gov/Agencies/Federal/Executive.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&#039;s another link to the executive office&lt;/a&gt;. Take a look at the Executive Departments over which the President, and by extension, the Vice President have control. I bet you&#039;ll find at least a couple there that might have something to do with &quot;energy&quot;, &quot;prosperity&quot;, and &quot;safety&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, what can she do as the vice president to make us more “energy independent”, “more prosperous”, “safer”, etc.? <strong>Send_me</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Send_me,</strong></p>
<p>Having the full weight of the executive branch behind her gives her power to do a great deal.</p>
<p>If you are not familiar with how the three branches of federal government work, here&#8217;s a link to <a href="http://bensguide.gpo.gov/3-5/government/branches.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Ben&#8217;s Guide to the Branches of Government.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>If you find that site a little to simple, <a href="http://www.usa.gov/Agencies/Federal/Executive.shtml" rel="nofollow">here&#8217;s another link to the executive office</a>. Take a look at the Executive Departments over which the President, and by extension, the Vice President have control. I bet you&#8217;ll find at least a couple there that might have something to do with &#8220;energy&#8221;, &#8220;prosperity&#8221;, and &#8220;safety&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t.ferg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-7/#comment-1434024</link>
		<dc:creator>t.ferg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1434024</guid>
		<description>Let me just get back on topic and say Palin did very well and came across as smart, relaxed, and strong. Granted it&#039;s easy to be relaxed when you&#039;re not being interrogated by the enemy (Gibson) but all in all people who liked her before will still like her and people who were undecided about her will have more reason to like her.

I do like the populist tone about reform and whatnot but I would like to hear less of this &quot;wall street corruption&quot; business and more focus on the government corruption, esp. with regard to Fannie and Freddie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me just get back on topic and say Palin did very well and came across as smart, relaxed, and strong. Granted it&#8217;s easy to be relaxed when you&#8217;re not being interrogated by the enemy (Gibson) but all in all people who liked her before will still like her and people who were undecided about her will have more reason to like her.</p>
<p>I do like the populist tone about reform and whatnot but I would like to hear less of this &#8220;wall street corruption&#8221; business and more focus on the government corruption, esp. with regard to Fannie and Freddie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-7/#comment-1434009</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1434009</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Send_me:&lt;/strong&gt;
The oil companies do not own the land. It&#039;s owned by the state, the people of Alaska. The oil companies lease the land for the right to drill.

The lease fees are based in part on barrels of oil produced, the difficulty in producing it, and the price of oil. 

Alaska does not take money from the oil companies and give it to its residents. Those refunds are based on excess &quot;profits&quot; the state has accumulated after all costs have been deducted from the revenue received from the oil production.

Most, if not all, of the money distributed to Alaskan residents last year was due to the high price of oil.

The &quot;lease&quot; arrangement that the oil companies have with Alaska is the most common arrangement that oil companies have for production of oil and natural gas. While they most certainly do own vast tracks of their own oil and gas fields, for the most part, they lease the rights to production from federal, state, county, city, and individuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Send_me:</strong><br />
The oil companies do not own the land. It&#8217;s owned by the state, the people of Alaska. The oil companies lease the land for the right to drill.</p>
<p>The lease fees are based in part on barrels of oil produced, the difficulty in producing it, and the price of oil. </p>
<p>Alaska does not take money from the oil companies and give it to its residents. Those refunds are based on excess &#8220;profits&#8221; the state has accumulated after all costs have been deducted from the revenue received from the oil production.</p>
<p>Most, if not all, of the money distributed to Alaskan residents last year was due to the high price of oil.</p>
<p>The &#8220;lease&#8221; arrangement that the oil companies have with Alaska is the most common arrangement that oil companies have for production of oil and natural gas. While they most certainly do own vast tracks of their own oil and gas fields, for the most part, they lease the rights to production from federal, state, county, city, and individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Shines, Obama &#8220;Please give it up&#8221;: &#171; Riggword Weblog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-7/#comment-1433916</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Shines, Obama &#8220;Please give it up&#8221;: &#171; Riggword Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433916</guid>
		<description>[...] From Hot Air: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Hot Air: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433815</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433815</guid>
		<description>Monday-morning quarterbacking/impressions:

The &#039;friendly&#039; environment may have done her more harm than good; she needs to watch those, since they will always give her more time to talk.  In her case, not sure if that was a good thing or not.

Personally, I thought she was too eager to talk, yet too reluctant to say anything.  That&#039;s gotta change, and soon.  I look forward to her next &quot;grilling&quot;-style interview, since she won&#039;t have a rat&#039;s chance there of running too long! ;-)

Takeaways:
. relax and feel comfortable.  Hannity&#039;s trying to help you!

. &quot;ruflle feathers&quot; - can&#039;t use that phrase more than twice in a single interview, ever again!  Get Dennis Miller&#039;s help on the thesaurus.

. needs a more thought-out answer in response to &quot;what are you going to do SPECIFICALLY&quot;.  The &quot;Change Washington&quot; phrase was wielded defensively in response to a follow-up question from Hannity, when he was trying to *help* her - not good IMHO.

It&#039;s okay if she or McCain don&#039;t know precisely what they&#039;ll do - in fact, that&#039;s a good thing, given that one has to *analyze what&#039;s wrong* first - but then SAY that; don&#039;t make it look like you&#039;re dodging the question!

&lt;em&gt;&quot;You&#039;re hiring me for my ability to come in, analyze a problem in detail, figure out what&#039;s wrong and *then* fix it, *not* for my psychic abilities.  I won&#039;t have the kind of access needed to really study the problem until you put John McCain and me in there so we can start focusing on it.  Until then, it&#039;s pointless for us (and that includes Obama!) to pontificate or speculate about things about which we know too little.&quot;

Remember, I&#039;m still the governor of Alaska.  That means I&#039;m running Alaska, solving Alaska&#039;s problems, fixing things there.  If you give me the opportunity, I&#039;ll bring all of that problem-solving experience to Washington...&quot;

&quot;I have a proven record of doing just that, at multiple levels of government.  Obama doesn&#039;t have that record, so all he *can* do is pontificate... what would you rather have, a talker or a doer?&quot;&lt;/em&gt;
Anyhow: Sarah had better hope as few people as possible base their first impression off of this thing.  She&#039;s much better than this, and it&#039;s not coming through.  I think maybe the campaign *should* have held her back a little more, give her some more time between interviews to compose herself.  Just a .0005-dollar opinion -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monday-morning quarterbacking/impressions:</p>
<p>The &#8216;friendly&#8217; environment may have done her more harm than good; she needs to watch those, since they will always give her more time to talk.  In her case, not sure if that was a good thing or not.</p>
<p>Personally, I thought she was too eager to talk, yet too reluctant to say anything.  That&#8217;s gotta change, and soon.  I look forward to her next &#8220;grilling&#8221;-style interview, since she won&#8217;t have a rat&#8217;s chance there of running too long! ;-)</p>
<p>Takeaways:<br />
. relax and feel comfortable.  Hannity&#8217;s trying to help you!</p>
<p>. &#8220;ruflle feathers&#8221; &#8211; can&#8217;t use that phrase more than twice in a single interview, ever again!  Get Dennis Miller&#8217;s help on the thesaurus.</p>
<p>. needs a more thought-out answer in response to &#8220;what are you going to do SPECIFICALLY&#8221;.  The &#8220;Change Washington&#8221; phrase was wielded defensively in response to a follow-up question from Hannity, when he was trying to *help* her &#8211; not good IMHO.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s okay if she or McCain don&#8217;t know precisely what they&#8217;ll do &#8211; in fact, that&#8217;s a good thing, given that one has to *analyze what&#8217;s wrong* first &#8211; but then SAY that; don&#8217;t make it look like you&#8217;re dodging the question!</p>
<p><em>&#8220;You&#8217;re hiring me for my ability to come in, analyze a problem in detail, figure out what&#8217;s wrong and *then* fix it, *not* for my psychic abilities.  I won&#8217;t have the kind of access needed to really study the problem until you put John McCain and me in there so we can start focusing on it.  Until then, it&#8217;s pointless for us (and that includes Obama!) to pontificate or speculate about things about which we know too little.&#8221;</p>
<p>Remember, I&#8217;m still the governor of Alaska.  That means I&#8217;m running Alaska, solving Alaska&#8217;s problems, fixing things there.  If you give me the opportunity, I&#8217;ll bring all of that problem-solving experience to Washington&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I have a proven record of doing just that, at multiple levels of government.  Obama doesn&#8217;t have that record, so all he *can* do is pontificate&#8230; what would you rather have, a talker or a doer?&#8221;</em><br />
Anyhow: Sarah had better hope as few people as possible base their first impression off of this thing.  She&#8217;s much better than this, and it&#8217;s not coming through.  I think maybe the campaign *should* have held her back a little more, give her some more time between interviews to compose herself.  Just a .0005-dollar opinion -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-Democrat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433764</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-Democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433764</guid>
		<description>Send_Me = troll

&quot;Please Do Not Feed the Troll&quot; -Zookeeper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send_Me = troll</p>
<p>&#8220;Please Do Not Feed the Troll&#8221; -Zookeeper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheSitRep</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433711</link>
		<dc:creator>TheSitRep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433711</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I would still like to know just where in the hell all of Obama’s money’s coming from.

Seriously. There is no way the grassroots crowd could even remotely raise this kind of doughage.

FiveWays on September 17, 2008 at 10:55 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I bet you he is getting it through foreign sources laundered through individual U.S. paypal accounts.

He has many friends from oil rich islamic states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I would still like to know just where in the hell all of Obama’s money’s coming from.</p>
<p>Seriously. There is no way the grassroots crowd could even remotely raise this kind of doughage.</p>
<p>FiveWays on September 17, 2008 at 10:55 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I bet you he is getting it through foreign sources laundered through individual U.S. paypal accounts.</p>
<p>He has many friends from oil rich islamic states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Helm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433703</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Helm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433703</guid>
		<description>This was a much more congenial and supportive environment for Palin and she responded accordingly.  True, her answers were coached and she probably did hold back on what she would have liked to have said, such as when Hannity set her up to knock Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac out of the park.  What we have to remember though is that she is the &lt;strong&gt;supporting&lt;/strong&gt; member of this cast--she probably felt and was probably advised--that it was McCain&#039;s role to take the lead on criticizing Freddie and Fannie--and it is.  As the &lt;strong&gt;presidential&lt;/strong&gt; candidate, &lt;strong&gt;McCain&lt;/strong&gt; has to take the lead in setting policy statements and has to show the initiative and willingness to take the helm--&lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt;the vice-presidential nominee.  She did what she was supposed to do, batted the volleyball up to set McCain up for the smash.  Now, it&#039;s up to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a much more congenial and supportive environment for Palin and she responded accordingly.  True, her answers were coached and she probably did hold back on what she would have liked to have said, such as when Hannity set her up to knock Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac out of the park.  What we have to remember though is that she is the <strong>supporting</strong> member of this cast&#8211;she probably felt and was probably advised&#8211;that it was McCain&#8217;s role to take the lead on criticizing Freddie and Fannie&#8211;and it is.  As the <strong>presidential</strong> candidate, <strong>McCain</strong> has to take the lead in setting policy statements and has to show the initiative and willingness to take the helm&#8211;<strong>not</strong>the vice-presidential nominee.  She did what she was supposed to do, batted the volleyball up to set McCain up for the smash.  Now, it&#8217;s up to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maverick muse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433634</link>
		<dc:creator>maverick muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433634</guid>
		<description>Forbes&#039; Investopedia: VOODOO ACCOUNTING</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forbes&#8217; Investopedia: VOODOO ACCOUNTING</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maverick muse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433632</link>
		<dc:creator>maverick muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433632</guid>
		<description>Is this the voodoo economics Reagan and Bush fought over?

Democrats created Fanny/Freddy. Democrats fed Fanny/Freddy to become obese. Fanny/Freddy paid Democrats to keep the growth cycle going. Democrats legislated punitive damages to banks/s&amp;l for NOT giving away mortgages to non-qualified buyers. Democrats want to perpetuate the obese feeding habits of Fanny/Freddy so as to perpetually bloat the Democrat coffers to simultaneously finance and activate their goal: The Downfall of America. Obama&#039;s dream is to play Joshua&#039;s trump to tumble down the walls and to bring in vast international investors purchasing gross amounts of American real estate, banks, investment firms and insurance institutions. 

Until mortgages are paid in full, the bank owns title; and who owns the bank, and who owns the insurance company? American stock holders or China, or even Russia? Democrats want a financial crisis so as to destabilize the American population, government and America&#039;s business and political interests internationally. 

Democrat Marxists unite and revolt to make Obama&#039;s Mean Dream to get him to his promised land of progressive desolation: TEAR DOWN EVERY WALL that constructs our Constitution and independent Free Enterprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the voodoo economics Reagan and Bush fought over?</p>
<p>Democrats created Fanny/Freddy. Democrats fed Fanny/Freddy to become obese. Fanny/Freddy paid Democrats to keep the growth cycle going. Democrats legislated punitive damages to banks/s&amp;l for NOT giving away mortgages to non-qualified buyers. Democrats want to perpetuate the obese feeding habits of Fanny/Freddy so as to perpetually bloat the Democrat coffers to simultaneously finance and activate their goal: The Downfall of America. Obama&#8217;s dream is to play Joshua&#8217;s trump to tumble down the walls and to bring in vast international investors purchasing gross amounts of American real estate, banks, investment firms and insurance institutions. </p>
<p>Until mortgages are paid in full, the bank owns title; and who owns the bank, and who owns the insurance company? American stock holders or China, or even Russia? Democrats want a financial crisis so as to destabilize the American population, government and America&#8217;s business and political interests internationally. </p>
<p>Democrat Marxists unite and revolt to make Obama&#8217;s Mean Dream to get him to his promised land of progressive desolation: TEAR DOWN EVERY WALL that constructs our Constitution and independent Free Enterprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sapwolf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433614</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433614</guid>
		<description>I just can&#039;t get enough of Palin.  Breath a fresh air.

By the way, there is nothing wrong with railing against Wall Street when those chumps drive perfectly good companies into the ground.

And, remember, the Repubs. in Congress, not just the Dems, had something to do with many problems we have financially.  Although, the Fannie/Freddie mess is 85-90% the fault of Dems over the years.

Just keep going after all the money Obama received from Fred/Fan and that McCain at least tried to do something back in 2005.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t get enough of Palin.  Breath a fresh air.</p>
<p>By the way, there is nothing wrong with railing against Wall Street when those chumps drive perfectly good companies into the ground.</p>
<p>And, remember, the Repubs. in Congress, not just the Dems, had something to do with many problems we have financially.  Although, the Fannie/Freddie mess is 85-90% the fault of Dems over the years.</p>
<p>Just keep going after all the money Obama received from Fred/Fan and that McCain at least tried to do something back in 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blatantblue</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433592</link>
		<dc:creator>blatantblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433592</guid>
		<description>this populist rhetoric is getting slightly annoying, and making McCain/Palin somewhat unattractive.  I was so amped for Sarah, but idk about all this bash wall street stuff..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this populist rhetoric is getting slightly annoying, and making McCain/Palin somewhat unattractive.  I was so amped for Sarah, but idk about all this bash wall street stuff..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canopfor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433582</link>
		<dc:creator>canopfor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433582</guid>
		<description>with both hands....

stonemeister on Sept 18,2008 12:18AM.

stonemeister: SOMEBODY IS GOING TO GO BLIND!!!!!!!!!! haah:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with both hands&#8230;.</p>
<p>stonemeister on Sept 18,2008 12:18AM.</p>
<p>stonemeister: SOMEBODY IS GOING TO GO BLIND!!!!!!!!!! haah:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trailboss</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433583</link>
		<dc:creator>trailboss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433583</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think we may have veered slightly off-topic.

stonemeister on September 18, 2008 at 12:19 &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well, it is open thread. Ok, last one.

Peter (after Lois tells him he&#039;s childish): &quot;If I&#039;m a child that means you&#039;re a pedophile, and I&#039;ll be damned if I&#039;m going stand here and take this from a pervert.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think we may have veered slightly off-topic.</p>
<p>stonemeister on September 18, 2008 at 12:19 </p></blockquote>
<p>Well, it is open thread. Ok, last one.</p>
<p>Peter (after Lois tells him he&#8217;s childish): &#8220;If I&#8217;m a child that means you&#8217;re a pedophile, and I&#8217;ll be damned if I&#8217;m going stand here and take this from a pervert.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stonemeister</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433581</link>
		<dc:creator>stonemeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433581</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;trailboss on September 18, 2008 at 12:17 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;I think we may have veered slightly off-topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>trailboss on September 18, 2008 at 12:17 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I think we may have veered slightly off-topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canopfor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433579</link>
		<dc:creator>canopfor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433579</guid>
		<description>SarahCuda should take HilRod hunting for
Moose,but for some reason,I think Hillary
would rather hunt Muscrat or beaver,or
sumpin like dat!!haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SarahCuda should take HilRod hunting for<br />
Moose,but for some reason,I think Hillary<br />
would rather hunt Muscrat or beaver,or<br />
sumpin like dat!!haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trailboss</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433576</link>
		<dc:creator>trailboss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433576</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;stonemeister on September 18, 2008 at 12:15 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can&#039;t breathe, I can&#039;t breathe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>stonemeister on September 18, 2008 at 12:15 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t breathe, I can&#8217;t breathe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stonemeister</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/open-thread-palin-on-hannity-colmes/comment-page-6/#comment-1433575</link>
		<dc:creator>stonemeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=27333#comment-1433575</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;trailboss on September 18, 2008 at 12:13 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Peter to daughter Meg:  Soon you&#039;ll be beating guys off with both hands!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>trailboss on September 18, 2008 at 12:13 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Peter to daughter Meg:  Soon you&#8217;ll be beating guys off with both hands!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
