Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


News flash (to the Left): Rosenbergs were spies

posted at 1:40 pm on September 17, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

The case of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg has for decades served as a cautionary tale told by the Left about Communist hysteria.  Executed as Soviet spies, the popular mythology paints the pair as merely ardent liberals unfairly framed and prosecuted by a paranoid American establishment.  Their family and friends have maintained this position even after the release of the Venona messages made it clear that Julius, at least, operated as a Soviet spy.

Now one of their co-defendants and close friends has finally confirmed what everyone else knew — that Julius Rosenberg spied for the Soviet Union:

Julius and [E]thel Rosenberg were executed 55 years ago, on June 19, 1953. But last week, they were back in the headlines when Morton Sobell, the co-defendant in their famous espionage trial, finally admitted that he and his friend, Julius, had both been Soviet agents.

It was a stunning admission; Sobell, now 91 years old, had adamantly maintained his innocence for more than half a century. After his comments were published, even the Rosenbergs’ children, Robert and Michael Meeropol, were left with little hope to hang on to — and this week, in comments unlike any they’ve made previously, the brothers acknowledged having reached the difficult conclusion that their father was, indeed, a spy. “I don’t have any reason to doubt Morty,” Michael Meeropol told Sam Roberts of the New York Times.

With these latest events, the end has arrived for the legions of the American left wing that have argued relentlessly for more than half a century that the Rosenbergs were victims, framed by a hostile, fear-mongering U.S. government. Since the couple’s trial, the left has portrayed them as martyrs for civil liberties, righteous dissenters whose chief crime was to express their constitutionally protected political beliefs. In the end, the left has argued, the two communists were put to death not for spying but for their unpopular opinions, at a time when the Truman and Eisenhower administrations were seeking to stem opposition to their anti-Soviet foreign policy during the Cold War.

The Meeropols have a better case with their mother, although not to dispute her own work as a Soviet spy.  Ronald Radosh notes that grand-jury testimony unsealed last week shows strong indications that the testimony of Ruth Greenglass — that Ethel had typed the messages Julius sent to his Soviet handlers — was likely concocted.  That had been suspected for decades, and represents a black mark on the prosecutors that handled the case.  The Venona messages indicate that Ethel knew about her husband’s work, but apparently do not indicate how much she participated in it.

Radosh also makes a good point about Joseph McCarthy, the demagogue who exploited the real danger of Soviet espionage for cheap political gain.  It’s true that the danger was real.  It’s equally true that McCarthy  seriously undermined the effort to defend against it by making wild, unsupportable accusations.  He turned the legitimate anti-Communist effort into a farcical witch hunt, and in doing so, made this country much less safe.  Venona gave some on the Right the hugely mistaken idea of attempting to rehabilitate McCarthy.

(An aside: Some Hollywood “historians” make McCarthy the villain not just of his jeremiads against the State Department and the Army, but also against Hollywood.  That’s not accurate.  The effort to root out Communist “sympathizers” in the entertainment industry came from the House Un-American Activities Committee, or HUACSenator McCarthy never sat on this committee, nor did the committee impose the “blacklist”; that came from studio executives, under tremendous political pressure to clean out Communists.)

It’s time for all the myths to end.  The Soviets presented a grave danger to this nation, and the Rosenbergs were a large part of their assault on America.  Their continued enshrinement as martyrs to free political thought insults both history and the intelligence of this nation.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Damn! How many times does this have to be proven until the left finally admits it…seventy times seven?

SKYFOX on September 18, 2008 at 4:36 AM

Although Zinn has written addendums to this books as recently as 2003, he could never bring himself to change his verdict of “innocent” in light of new evidence: like the 1995 release of Venona and the openning of the Soviet archives.

Zinn writes a weepy passage about Morton Sobell being thrown in Alcatraz to illustrate the lack of real justice in America–Yes, America has Show Trial and Gulag system, too, Howard.

“The case against Sobell seemed so weak that Sobell’s lawyers decided there was no need to provide a defense. But the jury found Sobell guilty, and Kaufman sentenced him to thirty years in prison.”

Most students eventually realize their textbooks were incomplete and inaccurate at best, slanted, or “full of lies” at worst…

One can only hope the students forced to read Zinn reach that conclusion sooner rather than later.

Peace_Sells… on September 17, 2008 at 2:20 PM

Sorry for inlining your entire post but I couldn’t trim a single word! Zinn owes the public an apology, the way that his book is being used uncritically in too many high schools (ugh).

By the way, Zinn’s book is not that bad if you take it with a grain of salt and have read many other history books [RD: or thinly disguised social tracts/polemics].

jim m on September 17, 2008 at 3:45 PM

What, like Mein Kampf?

Just kidding; comparing the two would be utterly wrong since one pretends to be a history book while the other one doesn’t.

At least you’re not contradicting the proposition that it’s a travesty for anyone to use the Zinn book in a high school curriculum. Good for you.

RD on September 18, 2008 at 7:30 AM

I found a site which alleges it has posted the entire trial transcript. So, when I have time, I will download and read it. However, it will not resolve the issue of whether perjured testimony was used against Ethel Rosenberg without the entire grand jury testimony.

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/FTrials/Rosenberg/RosenbergTrial.pdf

Blake on September 18, 2008 at 9:44 AM

Geeez, I must have been a CLOSET CONSERVATIVE at the age of eight years… I remember this trial and the EXECUTION… There was no doubt in my mind they were GUILTY…

pueblo1032 on September 18, 2008 at 1:03 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.