Did Obama just confirm Taheri? Update: Team McCain responds

posted at 9:02 am on September 16, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

Glenn Reynolds takes a close look at Barack Obama’s response to Amir Taheri and doesn’t see any daylight between them.  Yesterday, Taheri accused Obama of attempting to derail a status-of-forces agreement between the US and Iraq by telling the Iraqis to wait until after the American elections and stop negotiating with the Bush administration.  Obama responded by essentially confirming Taheri’s account:

In the New York Post, conservative Iranian-born columnist Amir Taheri quoted Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari as saying the Democrat made the demand when he visited Baghdad in July, while publicly demanding an early withdrawal.

“He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington,” Zebari said in an interview, according to Taheri.

“However, as an Iraqi, I prefer to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open,” Zebari reportedly said. …

Obama’s national security spokeswoman Wendy Morigi said Taheri’s article bore “as much resemblance to the truth as a McCain campaign commercial.”

In fact, Obama had told the Iraqis that they should not rush through a “Strategic Framework Agreement” governing the future of US forces until after President George W. Bush leaves office, she said.

Which is exactly what Taheri wrote.  Barack Obama went to Iraq and interfered with the diplomatic efforts of the elected United States government, in a war zone no less, by telling the Iraqis to stop negotiating with the President.  How exactly does that make Taheri’s column untruthful?

It wasn’t enough for Obama to fail at forcing the nation into a defeat in Iraq when he opposed the surge.  Now he has interfered with our efforts to stabilize Iraq and provide for its security after the surge succeeded in keeping Iraq from falling into a failed state.  And when he got caught working for failure and defeat, he tried making it into a smear against John McCain.

That’s not leadership America needs from a Senator, let alone a President.  The Senate should investigate this as a gross violation of the Constitution and the separation of powers between the branches of government.

Update: Team McCain’s response so far, given by Randy Scheuneman:

“At this point, it is not yet clear what official American negotiations Senator Obama tried to undermine with Iraqi leaders, but the possibility of such actions is unprecedented. It should be concerning to all that he reportedly urged that the democratically-elected Iraqi government listen to him rather than the US administration in power. If news reports are accurate, this is an egregious act of political interference by a presidential candidate seeking political advantage overseas. Senator Obama needs to reveal what he said to Iraq’s Foreign Minister during their closed door meeting. The charge that he sought to delay the withdrawal of Americans from Iraq raises serious questions about Senator Obama’s judgment and it demands an explanation.” —Randy Scheunemann, Senior Adviser McCain-Palin 2008

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Wow I missed that part of the Obama statement.

justinok on September 16, 2008 at 9:05 AM

Hammer him Mac.

If this were a GOP senator doing such a thing, you would need to stand four feet away from a newspaper’ front page just to read the size 700 font.

Bishop on September 16, 2008 at 9:05 AM

Well, well, well.

Spirit of 1776 on September 16, 2008 at 9:05 AM

They see no harm it what they did. The ego from BHO campaign is just mind blowing.

unseen on September 16, 2008 at 9:06 AM

Will any of the news networks pick this up? Nope. But you know, Sarah Palin can see Russia from her home.

robblefarian on September 16, 2008 at 9:06 AM

Sounds like a strong endorsement of McCain’s ads as well.

RBMN on September 16, 2008 at 9:06 AM

I don’t think they can put lipstick on this.

Mr. D on September 16, 2008 at 9:06 AM

This distraction is not helping Michelle Obama’s children.

Come on, guys. We can’t be dicking around with silly matters like this when there are unresolved issues in the Tanningbedgate scandal to work out.

Bruce in NH on September 16, 2008 at 9:08 AM

This story is the key to November but 10:1 says Johnny Mac will declare it off limits and not question Barack’s patriotism (again).

Limerick on September 16, 2008 at 9:08 AM

Iraqgate.

Annenberg-Ayersgate

Infanticidegate.

…all competing for final nail in coffin status?

Ouch!

Saltysam on September 16, 2008 at 9:08 AM

Why are we constantly told this guy is brilliant?

I have seen nothing out of Obama that makes me think he’s of even average intelligence, much less superior.

The only thing Obama has going for him is Harvard “education”, his blind ambition and his billionaire backers (e.g. George Soros).

There is absolutely nothing to this guy.

NoDonkey on September 16, 2008 at 9:09 AM

The MSM will avoid this as well as the Senate and Congress.

If the government is not investigating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, why would they investigate Obama?

There has to be a push by Americans by calling our congressman and woman to investigate this. It is unbelievable how much this guy gets away with!

jencab on September 16, 2008 at 9:09 AM

This distraction is not helping Michelle Obama’s children.

Bruce in NH on September 16, 2008 at 9:08 AM

Perhaps the Obamas might explain how delaying U.S. troop withdrawals from Iraq is going to help Sarah Palin’s son (now deployed).

ncc770 on September 16, 2008 at 9:10 AM

Me thinks,that Obama,was undermining the Government
of the United States of America,and was busy wheeling
and dealing without any offical authorization!

Maybe Obama could hold Nancy Pelosi hand,and the
both of them go around to Syria and Iran to do
some more back room deals!!

Hears the Liberal talkin point,more than likey,
he was “COMMUNITY ORGANIZING IN IRAQ!!!

canopfor on September 16, 2008 at 9:11 AM

The MSM will avoid this as well as the Senate and Congress.

If the government is not investigating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, why would they investigate Obama?

There has to be a push by Americans by calling our congressman and woman to investigate this. It is unbelievable how much this guy gets away with!

jencab on September 16, 2008 at 9:09 AM

There you have it and it has to be a sustained push not a dabbling one…

not likely “Bambi gets a pass again”.

sven10077 on September 16, 2008 at 9:11 AM

The Senate should investigate this as a gross violation of the Constitution and the separation of powers between the branches of government.

Nice comic line.

What’s next?

Reid to slash spending and take hard line on deficit and govt growth?

Never Happen.

Short of kidnapping them and leaving them in the Kalifornia desert to die, we’re all screwed.

Sedition and treason be damned.

JP1986UM on September 16, 2008 at 9:11 AM

He’s just undermining America, but he’s still a nice guy.

moonsbreath on September 16, 2008 at 9:12 AM

This is the primary reason he went to Iraq. He was hiding in plain sight undermining US foreign policy – practically on the battlefield no less. Can he not be arrested for this? Can you imagine Lincoln putting up with this? FDR?

Akzed on September 16, 2008 at 9:12 AM

What the hell is she doing? Do these people even read what they put out? Good grief. That woman is an idiot.

JAM on September 16, 2008 at 9:12 AM

Obama isn’t simply unpatriotic, he’s subversive . . . and dumb. To paraphrase his own words: You can bestow an Ivy League degree upon a fool but he will still be a fool.

rplat on September 16, 2008 at 9:12 AM

In fact, Obama had told the Iraqis that they should not rush through a “Strategic Framework Agreement” governing the future of US forces until after President George W. Bush leaves office, she said.

What did I miss?
Isn’t that what McCain said?
I am totally confused…Obama said he didn’t ask for a delay, then he stated he did.
McCain said Obama asked for a delay, and was told he was wrong, then stated that Obama actually did ask for a delay.
*
So Obama’s argument is this:
I did not ask for a decision to be delayed after the elections…however, I did ask for the decision not to be rushed through until after Bush leaves office.

right2bright on September 16, 2008 at 9:13 AM

Hammer him Mac.
If this were a GOP senator doing such a thing, you would need to stand four feet away from a newspaper’ front page just to read the size 700 font.
” – Bishop on September 16, 2008 at 9:05 AM

..or is the US Department of Justice the more appropriate source of this particular hammer?

Lockstein13 on September 16, 2008 at 9:13 AM

Obama’s national security spokeswoman Wendy Morigi said Taheri’s article bore “as much resemblance to the truth as a McCain campaign commercial.”

So I guess those McCain commercials are true.

pappy on September 16, 2008 at 9:15 AM

Didn’t they use to shoot traitors, not elect them to office. This speaks volumes about the so called democratic party and it’s mission to destory the country.

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on September 16, 2008 at 9:16 AM

This is probably big enough to get Obama tossed out of the election if pressed hard enough. My guess is that McCain won’t bother with it. Too bad.

nazarioj001 on September 16, 2008 at 9:16 AM

How does a professor of Constitutional law not know that he was violating the spirit and letter of the Constitution?

flipflop on September 16, 2008 at 9:16 AM

Wow, you guys have this all wrong. It wasn’t that he tried to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington, which would probably violate the Logan Act. What he really did was try to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington, which is just common sense. Can’t you stupid rethuglikkkans see the nuance?

trubble on September 16, 2008 at 9:17 AM

Obama’s national security spokeswoman Wendy Morigi said Taheri’s article bore “as much resemblance to the truth as a McCain campaign commercial.”

So I guess those McCain commercials are true.

pappy on September 16, 2008 at 9:15 AM

That’s what I got out of it…McCain’s telling the truth, and they are complaining about it.
Aha! We caught McCain in another truth…

right2bright on September 16, 2008 at 9:17 AM

See, they can deny it.

Article Statement says that he asked them why they would decide on their own to delay.
“He asked why we were not prepared to delay….”

Obama statement says that he told them to delay it, rather than ask them to think about it.
In fact, Obama had told the Iraqis that they should not rush through a “Strategic Framework Agreement” governing the future of US forces until after President George W. Bush leaves office, she said.

They can deny it, but it proves the overall argument: he interfered.

Samhain on September 16, 2008 at 9:17 AM

Anyone heard a word about this epic story on the news? I heard that Sarah Palin has a tanning bed in her house.

marklmail on September 16, 2008 at 9:18 AM

The most troubling aspect of this is not that Obama thinks it was his right to interfere, nor the sheer level of hypocrisy exhibited, but that the action displays a degree of arrogance which is far beyond that normally seen in such politicians.

Yoop on September 16, 2008 at 9:19 AM

Logan Act?

jp on September 16, 2008 at 9:19 AM

Anyone heard a word about this epic story on the news? I heard that Sarah Palin has a tanning bed in her house.

marklmail on September 16, 2008 at 9:18 AM

Worse then that, Todd is rated as a pilot, his plane has floats on it, so he is now a FAA criminal…he is not rated to fly a plane with floats…hang the sonofb*tch…

right2bright on September 16, 2008 at 9:20 AM

Please for the sake of my children and grandchildren, don’t leave this to the McCain campaign or the press. This is huge and every American needs to know this as well as his attempts to suppress free speech at WGN in Chicago. 49 days 7 weeks from today and so much work to do and we need each other as never before.
Hit them hard and be relentless.

amex on September 16, 2008 at 9:20 AM

I’m reminded of the Iran hostage crisis in which Regan was accused of pressuring the Iranians to wait until after the election before releasing the hostages. I like to think that they were released after the election because Regan said he’d bomb the shi. out of Iran unless they did.

Rod on September 16, 2008 at 9:20 AM

the only way the MSM will pick this up is if Palin brings it up. she should hammer him on this McCain can say it is troubling etc

unseen on September 16, 2008 at 9:20 AM

HEARINGS! NOW!

marklmail on September 16, 2008 at 9:21 AM

“Yardarm? Sherby, does the Navy still hang treasonous radical presidential candidates people from yardarms?”

\sarc

The Large Hadron Collider doesn’t have s*** on the forces produced by our Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.

Flyover Country on September 16, 2008 at 9:21 AM

I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for a Congressional investigation of any Dimocrats. They’re way too busy investigating Republicans.

GarandFan on September 16, 2008 at 9:21 AM

In another era this would have been punished severely.

brak on September 16, 2008 at 9:21 AM

unseen on September 16, 2008 at 9:20 AM

Youza!

Limerick on September 16, 2008 at 9:22 AM

this guy must be kept out of power, its bad enough he was elected Senator

jp on September 16, 2008 at 9:22 AM

Please please tell me that you are making this up. I mean no one could be this inexperienced and arrogant.

And his spokesperson confirms this.

Priceless.

DVPTexFla on September 16, 2008 at 9:23 AM

How does delaying troop withdrawls do anything to meet Obama’s promise to withdraw troops as quickly as possible?

I guess everything Obama says is just a cynical calculation to get more power.

Right_of_Attila on September 16, 2008 at 9:23 AM

Isn’t there one – just one – MSM reporter who’s ambitious enough to follow up on this potentially blockbuster story?

Seems like a career-making opportunity. The atmosphere in MSM organizations must be pretty oppressive for otherwise-competitive journalists to pass this one up.

But they will. The Obama campaign will release another weaselly obfuscatory statement and the press will unanimously pronounce the matter closed, and another example of McCain’s LYING LIES!! Oh and by the way did you hear the one about the rewiring of the AK Governor’s mansion to accommodate Sarah’s $43.6+ million vanity tanning bed? I hear she paid for it with the proceeds of Wasilla’s Victim Rape Kit sales!

Gilda on September 16, 2008 at 9:24 AM

I like to think that they were released after the election because Regan said he’d bomb the shi. out of Iran unless they did.

Rod on September 16, 2008 at 9:20 AM

There was no doubt that is why they released them. He made it in no uncertain terms that often people have to give their lives to a greater common cause. And our hostages may have to be the ones, but he made it clear that the result would be devastating to the country for a few men.
They felt (and he never tried to play it down) that he was a trigger happy American cowboy.
After the elections, they couldn’t release them quick enough…

right2bright on September 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM

As others have stated Barry was positive he was going to be the next POTUS. No ifs, ands, or buts…….and he just might be. :(

This guy is an Allen Drury novel come alive.

Limerick on September 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM

Pat Fitzgerald, call your office.

fossten on September 16, 2008 at 9:27 AM

Time to run with it…

Wow…I knew they were stupid and arrogant, but seriously. This is almost like the end of a Perry Mason episode.

Asher on September 16, 2008 at 9:27 AM

The Senate should investigate this as a gross violation of the Constitution and the separation of powers between the branches of government.

Okay I think we have some Obama Derange Syndrome going on here that is getting just as bad as the Impeach Bush people.

http://foreign.senate.gov/about.html
Yes, he is a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and can talk to other governments about foreign relations or policies, which is exactly what he did. While the President and State Department negotiate the specific foreign agreements, they must be confirmed by the Senate. Could he maybe be censor by the Senate for stepping across the line? I doubt it based on how I read the Constitution and facts. Unless someone as a smoking gun this is really a non-issue on that point and the only point people need to be hitting on is the fact he is wanting to delay the withdraw from Iraq.

JeffinSac on September 16, 2008 at 9:28 AM

As Harry Truman said, I tell the truth and other people think it’s hell. Whenever you confront most dem/liberals (and especially lib politicians) with truth they go into convulsions and cries of ‘unfairness’, especially when you dare repeat their words back to them. According to the Obamanation words have an expiration date, somewhere around twenty four hours to a week. After that, any change is ok, even to the extent of denying that you had ever made the challenged statement(s) in the first place.
As a pithy saying from Merry Ole England has it, the greater the truth the greater the libel, and no one knows this better than the dem libsocialist politicians like the Obamanation. The more you tell the truth against him and them, the more damning he/the appear. Like sunshine to a vampire, they do best in dark places.

eaglewingz08 on September 16, 2008 at 9:29 AM

trubble on September 16, 2008 at 9:17 AM

It’s nice to see how energetically you Dims try to protect that worthless piece of crap you nominated..

TexasJew on September 16, 2008 at 9:29 AM

unseen at 9:20 has the answer…this is Palin’s job as the Veep. To go after Obama on this very subject, attack him for undermining the U.S., and nothing wrong with throwing in a little “and as a mom with a soldier in Iraq, this is not the kind of man I want telling him to retreat in the face of victory” speach…

right2bright on September 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM

by the way….

turns out some of Bambi’s co-workers are saying Bambi inflated his resume a bit….

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:17 am Post subject: The Perfect Stranger or Who is Obama?

——————————————————————————–

August 29, 2008
The Perfect Stranger
By Charles Krauthammer

WASHINGTON — Barack Obama is an immensely talented man whose talents have been largely devoted to crafting, and chronicling, his own life. Not things. Not ideas. Not institutions. But himself.

Nothing wrong or even terribly odd about that, except that he is laying claim to the job of crafting the coming history of the United States. A leap of such audacity is odd. The air of unease at the Democratic convention this week was not just a result of the Clinton psychodrama. The deeper anxiety was that the party was nominating a man of many gifts but precious few accomplishments — bearing even fewer witnesses.

When John Kerry was introduced at his convention four years ago, an honor guard of a dozen mates from his Vietnam days surrounded him on the podium attesting to his character and readiness to lead. Such personal testimonials are the norm. The roster of fellow soldiers or fellow senators who could from personal experience vouch for John McCain is rather long. At a less partisan date in the calendar, that roster might even include Democrats Russ Feingold and Edward Kennedy, with whom John McCain has worked to fashion important legislation.

Eerily missing at the Democratic convention this year were people of stature who were seriously involved at some point in Obama’s life standing up to say: I know Barack Obama. I’ve been with Barack Obama. We’ve toiled/endured together. You can trust him. I do.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/obama_the_mysterious_s.html

First, Mr. Obama’s version as presented in from Dreams From My Father, pp 55-6:

CHAPTER SEVEN

… And so, in the months leading up to graduation, I wrote to every civil rights organization I could think of, to any black elected official in the country with a progressive agenda, to neighborhood councils and tenant rights groups. When no one wrote back, I wasn’t discouraged. I decided to find more conventional work for a year, to pay off my student loans and maybe even save a little bit. I would need the money later, I told myself. Organizers didn’t make any money; their poverty was proof of their integrity.

Eventually a consulting house to multinational corporations agreed to hire me as a research assistant. Like a spy behind enemy lines, I arrived every day at my mid-Manhattan office and sat at my computer terminal, checking the Reuters machine that blinked bright emerald messages from across the globe. As far as I could tell I was the only black man in the company, a source of shame for me but a source of considerable pride for the company’s secretarial pool. They treated me like a son, those black ladies; they told me how they expected me to run the company one day…

Nevertheless, as the months passed, I felt the idea of becoming an organizer slipping away from me. The company promoted me to the position of financial writer. I had my own office, my own secretary, money in the bank. Sometimes, coming out of an interview with Japanese financiers or German bond traders, I would catch my reflection in the elevator doors-see myself in a suit and tie, a briefcase in my hand-and for a split second I would imagine myself as a captain of industry, barking out orders, closing the deal, before I remembered who it was that I had told myself I wanted to be and felt pangs of guilt for my lack of resolve.

Then one day, as I sat down at my computer to write an article on interest-rate swaps, something unexpected happened. Auma called. I had never met this half sister; we had written only intermittently…

[A] few months after Auma called, I turned in my resignation at the consulting firm and began looking in earnest for an organizing job…

Barack Obama Embellishes His Resume
July 9th, 2005

[by Dan Armstrong]

Don’t get me wrong – I’m a big fan of Barack Obama, the Illinois freshman senator and hot young Democratic Party star. But after reading his autobiography, I have to say that Barack engages in some serious exaggeration when he describes a job that he held in the mid-1980s. I know because I sat down the hall from him, in the same department, and worked closely with his boss. I can’t say I was particularly close to Barack – he was reserved and distant towards all of his co-workers – but I was probably as close to him as anyone. I certainly know what he did there, and it bears only a loose resemblance to what he wrote in his book.

Here’s Barack’s account:

Eventually a consulting house to multinational corporations agreed to hire me as a research assistant. Like a spy behind enemy lines, I arrived every day at my mid-Manhattan office and sat at my computer terminal, checking the Reuters machine that blinked bright emerald messages from across the globe. As far as I could tell I was the only black man in the company, a source of shame for me but a source of considerable pride for the company’s secretarial pool.

First, it wasn’t a consulting house; it was a small company that published newsletters on international business. Like most newsletter publishers, it was a bit of a sweatshop. I’m sure we all wished that we were high-priced consultants to multinational corporations. But we also enjoyed coming in at ten, wearing jeans to work, flirting with our co-workers, partying when we stayed late, and bonding over the low salaries and heavy workload.

Barack worked on one of the company’s reference publications. Each month customers got a new set of pages on business conditions in a particular country, punched to fit into a three-ring binder. Barack’s job was to get copy from the country correspondents and edit it so that it fit into a standard outline. There was probably some research involved as well, since correspondents usually don’t send exactly what you ask for, and you can’t always decipher their copy. But essentially the job was copyediting.

It’s also not true that Barack was the only black man in the company. He was the only black professional man. Fred was an African-American who worked in the mailroom with his son. My boss and I used to join them on Friday afternoons to drink beer behind the stacks of office supplies. That’s not the kind of thing that Barack would do. Like I said, he was somewhat aloof.

… as the months passed, I felt the idea of becoming an organizer slipping away from me. The company promoted me to the position of financial writer. I had my own office, my own secretary; money in the bank. Sometimes, coming out of an interview with Japanese financiers or German bond traders, I would catch my reflection in the elevator doors—see myself in a suit and tie, a briefcase in my hand—and for a split second I would imagine myself as a captain of industry, barking out orders, closing the deal, before I remembered who it was that I had told myself I wanted to be and felt pangs of guilt for my lack of resolve.

If Barack was promoted, his new job responsibilities were more of the same – rewriting other people’s copy. As far as I know, he always had a small office, and the idea that he had a secretary is laughable. Only the company president had a secretary. Barack never left the office, never wore a tie, and had neither reason nor opportunity to interview Japanese financiers or German bond traders.

Then one day, as I sat down at my computer to write an article on interest-rate swaps, something unexpected happened…. I had never met this half sister; we had written only intermittently. …[several pages on his suffering half-sister] …a few months after Auma called, I turned in my resignation at the consulting firm and began looking in earnest for an organizing job.

What Barack means here is that he got copy from a correspondent who didn’t understand interest rate swaps, and he was trying to make sense out of it.

All of Barack’s embellishment serves a larger narrative purpose: to retell the story of the Christ’s temptation. The young, idealistic, would-be community organizer gets a nice suit, joins a consulting house, starts hanging out with investment bankers, and barely escapes moving into the big mansion with the white folks. Luckily, an angel calls, awakens his conscience, and helps him choose instead to fight for the people.

Like I said, I’m a fan. His famous keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention moved me to tears. The Democrats – not to mention America – need a mixed-race spokesperson who can connect to both urban blacks and rural whites, who has the credibility to challenge the status quo on issues ranging from misogynistic rap to unfair school funding.

And yet I’m disappointed. Barack’s story may be true, but many of the facts are not. His larger narrative purpose requires him to embellish his role. I don’t buy it. Just as I can’t be inspired by Steve Jobs now that I know how dishonest he is, I can’t listen uncritically to Barack Obama now that I know he’s willing to bend the facts to his purpose.

Once, when I applied for a marketing job at a big accounting firm, my then-supervisor called HR to say that I had exaggerated something on my resume. I didn’t agree, but I also didn’t get the job. But when Barack Obama invents facts in a book ranked No. 8 on the NY Times nonfiction list, it not only fails to be noticed but it helps elevate him into the national political pantheon.

sven10077 on September 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM

Obama’s presidential seal gave him the right to negotiate with Iraq.

Dusty on September 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM

Wow, yesterday was a really bad day for the Obama campaign, as well as the Liberal Media. While Obama is busy getting busted enforcing Chicago thuggery tactics everywhere he wanders, the MSM is busy reporting on a Palin tanning booth.

Keemo on September 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM

Oops. By ‘dark places’ I meant ‘unlit places’. I don’t want any obamabot to claim that I was using a ‘racist’ term or any reference to Obama’s or other democrat’s skin tones.

eaglewingz08 on September 16, 2008 at 9:31 AM

trubble on September 16, 2008 at 9:17 AM

It’s nice to see how energetically you Dims try to protect that worthless piece of crap you nominated..

TexasJew on September 16, 2008 at 9:29 AM

I think he was being sarcastic, no one is that stupid…

right2bright on September 16, 2008 at 9:31 AM

So…according to the Obama campaign, the article was false, yet what it said was true. Oooook.

“Remember Jerry, it’s not a lie…if you believe it.” — George Costanza

CP on September 16, 2008 at 9:31 AM

What about all those “Imperial PRES!!!” bumper stickers?

Looks like they won’t be going out of stock after all.

Techie on September 16, 2008 at 9:31 AM

Unless someone as a smoking gun this is really a non-issue on that point and the only point people need to be hitting on is the fact he is wanting to delay the withdraw from Iraq.

Your missing the point. A one year extentsion of the UN charter would put off the SOFA for a year. Which means that Obama, if elected, could just pull everyone out based on no Status Of Forces Agreement by the end of 2009.

It’s not putting it off, it’s speeding it up.

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on September 16, 2008 at 9:33 AM

Keemo on September 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM

It was a bad day for BO even though the market implosion the Democrats and media have been rooting for occurred.

These guys can botch just about anything.

forest on September 16, 2008 at 9:34 AM

the MSM is busy reporting on a Palin tanning booth.

Keemo on September 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM

What??? A tanning booth, that’s it, we pull out of Iraq right now…

right2bright on September 16, 2008 at 9:34 AM

trubble on September 16, 2008 at 9:17 AM

It’s nice to see how energetically you Dims try to protect that worthless piece of crap you nominated..

TexasJew on September 16, 2008 at 9:29 AM

Easy, trigger, I figured the /sarc tag was implied. Save it for Alphie.

trubble on September 16, 2008 at 9:35 AM

Wendi Morigi has mastered Newspeak”.

TooTall on September 16, 2008 at 9:35 AM

treason we can see

trailortrash on September 16, 2008 at 9:36 AM

Congressional investigation in 3…2…NEVER!

ronsfi on September 16, 2008 at 9:38 AM

Obama’s national security spokeswoman Wendy Morigi said Taheri’s article bore “as much resemblance to the truth as a McCain campaign commercial.”

That means so much coming from the Obama camp. /not.

4shoes on September 16, 2008 at 9:38 AM

As a concerned Christian, I question the timing…..

CBarker on September 16, 2008 at 9:38 AM

His Holeyness just didn’t want to be stuck with an agreement he couldn’t take credit for, that’s all.
After all, he couldn’t be expected to live up to a deal made by Bushitler, now, could he?
That would be below his ego grade.
Still, it’s not out of line to ask. It’s WAY over the line to tell.

either orr on September 16, 2008 at 9:39 AM

Logan Act?

jp on September 16, 2008 at 9:19 AM

The Logan Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 953 [1948]) is a single federal statute making it a crime for a citizen to confer with foreign governments against the interests of the United States. Specifically, it prohibits citizens from negotiating with other nations on behalf of the United States without authorization.

http://law.jrank.org/pages/8357/Logan-Act.html

Lincoln or even FDR for that matter would have him arrested.

CC

CapedConservative on September 16, 2008 at 9:40 AM

Ya,Obama was going to Iraq to see the troops,piff I say,
another clinton type slickster,making backroom deals
Chicago style,me thinks!!!

canopfor on September 16, 2008 at 9:40 AM

If congress and the MSM will take no action, then the Bush administration needs to announce a Justice Department investigation.

Otherwise, Bush is an irrelevant lame duck.

Right_of_Attila on September 16, 2008 at 9:41 AM

right2bright on September 16, 2008 at 9:13 AM

So Obama’s argument is this:
I did not ask for a decision to be delayed after the elections…however, I did ask for the decision not to be rushed through until after Bush leaves office.

Maybe it’s like when Obama said if anyone wins at irrelevant commericials, it’s him. In other words, maybe he or someone who speaks for him misspoke.

“I, ah, I, ah, ah, ah … Let me be clear. I’m totally opaque. That’s been my position all along. This is outrageous. If I find anyone in my administration who’s done this, they will be fired immediately. Right after my term is up. Enough is enough. Let’s move on. I will not talk about this anymore. I’ll be happy to discuss this further, any time, any place. Bring it on. I’m running a new type of campaign, without personal attacks. Have you noticed McCain is really old? No, I didn’t say that. I’m running a post-racial campaign. And did I mention I’m black? My mother is white. In a way I’m white. I’m black. White. Black. White. Black. Let me be clear. I’m clear as mud.”

Paul-Cincy on September 16, 2008 at 9:42 AM

Yes, he is a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and can talk to other governments about foreign relations or policies, which is exactly what he did. While the President and State Department negotiate the specific foreign agreements, they must be confirmed by the Senate. Could he maybe be censor by the Senate for stepping across the line? I doubt it based on how I read the Constitution and facts. Unless someone as a smoking gun this is really a non-issue on that point and the only point people need to be hitting on is the fact he is wanting to delay the withdraw from Iraq.

JeffinSac on September 16, 2008 at 9:28 AM

I don’t know what constitution you read, but individuals cannot conduct foreign policy. And even committee members cannot conduct policy “discussions” with any leader without prior approval.
As far as the smoking gun, isn’t his admittance that he did such the “smoking gun”. I don’t think you understand the term “smoking gun” usually that is something you look for absent of any other proof. In this case we have Obama admitting he actually did this.
That wasn’t even a good try…you get a D- for reasoning and F for being an obvious troll.

right2bright on September 16, 2008 at 9:43 AM

Dumb question, but who has the power to call hearings? I’d like to give that individual a call.

marklmail on September 16, 2008 at 9:43 AM

Obama is willing to lie to his followers, crap on his country and endanger our troops to win a campaign.

Yeah, I’m questioning his patriotism.

No. Actually, I am denying his patriotism.

Pavel on September 16, 2008 at 9:44 AM

Looking at it from the Iraqi perspective I can’t help but smile at the moxy and pragmatism they showed here. They have an eight year history of watching GW, against the odds, being the last man standing. Barry struts in with pomp and circumstance and they giggled.

Limerick on September 16, 2008 at 9:47 AM

Isn’t it amazing how the Obama campaign think they’re debunking something and they end up CONFIRMING it? Susan Rice did the same thing, regularly, when talking about Obama’s “Iraq position” earlier in the campaign (BTW, where is she lately?)

Moxie on September 16, 2008 at 9:47 AM

If there was ever a story to “Buzz” on yahoo….

RedBurns on September 16, 2008 at 9:47 AM

This issue is as good as dead!! With the “Bush/McCain” economy melting down the MSM will not have report to report this scandalous undermining of US policy.

CinC on September 16, 2008 at 9:49 AM

JeffinSac on September 16, 2008 at 9:28 AM

http://www.senate.gov/~foreign/jurisdiction.html

There are the articles detailing the jurisdiction of the Committee on Foreign Relations. The activities of Barack Obama in this matter, in my opinion, falls outside the jurisdiction of this committee.

covel on September 16, 2008 at 9:49 AM

1) This story really is HUGE. Think about the potential consequences of it (should the media and government actually decide to do their job). Obama is in clear violation of the Logan Act and has admitted it. Not prosecuting him for whatever reason makes it harder for us to go after others in the future (look at the lack of sedition and treason prosecutions during Vietnam). 2) The media and government will not decide to do their job on their own. It is up to bloggers and everyone who reads them to contact MSM outlets and push this story…hard.

davenp35 on September 16, 2008 at 9:49 AM

Barry really does think he is already president. What an egotistical ass.

txsurveyor on September 16, 2008 at 9:53 AM

Logan Act?

jp on September 16, 2008 at 9:19 AM

Clearly…THE most flagrant example of a violation you will find…

jerrytbg on September 16, 2008 at 9:53 AM

Ladies and Gentlemen, stand by for the ceremonial, toss under the bus, of Obama spokesperson Wendy Morigi. . .

Jason Coleman on September 16, 2008 at 9:55 AM

Dumb question, but who has the power to call hearings? I’d like to give that individual a call.

marklmail on September 16, 2008 at 9:43 AM

I believe…any member of the house…Wee just need someone with b__ls!

jerrytbg on September 16, 2008 at 9:56 AM

Who can call for a hearing on this?

marklmail on September 16, 2008 at 9:56 AM

How I know that nothing will be done about this? Because Jimmy Carter isn’t in prison.

Deanna on September 16, 2008 at 9:57 AM

just to read the size 700 font

Classic! hahahaha

btw, let’s don’t forget WoodsFoundationGate.

ex-Democrat on September 16, 2008 at 9:58 AM

No one has ever been prosecuted under the Logan Act, and there have been a few rather spectacular violations — see Pelosi, Nixon, etc. — in the past.

It’s pretty clear that Osama Obama can do anything he wants, and his cheerleaders will either lie about what he did, ignore it or turn it into some sort of twisted virtue. If lesser lights like Charlie Rangel and William Jefferson can skate on more easily provable crimes, The Messiah’s not going to break a sweat on a simple little matter like treason.

He wouldn’t be true to Ayers, Dohrn, Rezko, Wright and the rest of his pals if he suddenly grew scruples now.

MrScribbler on September 16, 2008 at 9:58 AM

This has to be the most HAM-handed thing I’ve seen him do yet. I can hear Hillary laughing from way over here in Texas….

MBuck on September 16, 2008 at 9:58 AM

If congress and the MSM will take no action, then the Bush administration needs to announce a Justice Department investigation.

Otherwise, Bush is an irrelevant lame duck.

Right_of_Attila on September 16, 2008 at 9:41 AM

Yes, President Bush could take this bull by the horns and send it charging at Obambi. All it would take is a phone call to the Attorney General.

But I’m afraid the President is determined to make himself “an irrelevant lame duck.”

MrLynn on September 16, 2008 at 9:58 AM

Sure he’s a treasonous dimwitted socialist with a spiteful, angry, racist racist wife, but he’s just so dreamy.

Alden Pyle on September 16, 2008 at 10:00 AM

This has to be the most HAM-handed thing I’ve seen him do yet. I can hear Hillary laughing cackling from way over here in Texas….

MBuck on September 16, 2008 at 9:58 AM

All fixed

Alden Pyle on September 16, 2008 at 10:01 AM

Wait, you mean having your own pseudo-presidential seal doesn’t permit you to undermine the government of the U.S.? I guarantee the media will do nothing about this unless there’s a blogstorm of epic proportions. Did you notice how little attention the agreement to reduce forces received in the MSM? Obama (and his media minions) know Bush just pulled the rug out from under Bambi’s biggest campaign promise. I doubt DOJ will prosecute him under the Logan Act, anymore than they did Jimmy Carter. But McCain should be all over this like white on rice. (Wait, is that racist? I never know anymore.)

doppelganglander on September 16, 2008 at 10:05 AM

davenp35 on September 16, 2008 at 9:49 AM

Absolutely! Should include Pelosi as well. Not the senate, should be the FBI.

burt on September 16, 2008 at 10:06 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3