Cone of Silence update: Couric to interview Palin

posted at 1:05 pm on September 16, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

Sarah Palin continues her introduction to both the American people and the media by agreeing to another broadcast network interview, this time with another female pioneer.  Katie Couric will sit down with both Palin and John McCain in prime-time interviews that will run on the entire platform of CBS News programs, much as ABC handled its exclusive with Palin last week:

Breaking: TVNewser has learned Katie Couric will interview Republican VP nominee Gov. Sarah Palin next week on the campaign trail, days before the first presidential debate.

This is a good move by the McCain/Palin team.  It shows a lack of fear in putting Palin on the hot seat after her decent but not blockbuster performance with ABC.  She appeared on Sean Hannity’s show last night [see update below], but that doesn’t count as a potentially adversarial news interview; Hannity supports the McCain/Palin ticket, obviously and explicitly, and friendly-turf chats don’t count when arguing against the supposed “cone of silence” that McCain allegedly dropped on Palin.

How will Couric handle the interview?  She could start by reviewing what didn’t work with Gibson, including the condescending, professorial tone he took with Palin.   Couric also needs to do better research on Palin’s statements and positions, and avoid “pop quizzes” and focus on Palin’s own positions on foreign policy.

Palin did well enough with Gibson, but she needs to do some work as well for this appearance.  Palin needs to understand how important this interview will be to Couric and CBS, where their news broadcast regularly runs last in the standings.   Couric will want to come across as a heavyweight and not a soft, Today-show interviewer, so Palin has to avoid underestimating Couric.  She’s had her first major interview, and she won’t get any slack for being a rookie.  Palin has to be herself and not let Couric rattle her.

Eventually, Palin will have to do an interview with NBC, either with Tom Brokaw or Brian Williams, and probably Wolf Blitzer at CNN.   These interviews will have more impact than the VP debate in terms of impact on the ticket, and gives the McCain/Palin ticket a great opportunity to extend the Palin phenomenon in the race.  With opportunity comes risk, but after handling her ABC interview as well as she did, the risks have dropped considerably.

Update: The Hannity interview got delayed until later this week; it had originally been scheduled for last night.

Also, the reason that these interviews will have a bigger impact than the debate is that Biden will probably be more careful to avoid condescension and antagonism.  The debate will probably not get as many viewers as the combined audiences of all these interviews, either, although it will certainly attract more than the Cheney-Edwards debate in 2004.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

I think Couric is going to come out guns a blazin. She took a lot of nutroots heat for challenging Obama on the surge. A lot of them blame that interview, instead of his German arrogance, on the failed trip.

BadgerHawk on September 16, 2008 at 1:08 PM

and friendly-turf chats don’t count

Too bad that every presidential debate is a friendly-turf chat for Obama. I haven’t seen the scheduled Fox debate yet.

amerpundit on September 16, 2008 at 1:08 PM

Hope Palin brings her own camera crew so she can respond to any hatchet-job editing.

Wethal on September 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM

And no garbage edits, CBS. Show the whole interview.

BadgerHawk on September 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM

wait — when did this become a prerequisite to holding office? she has to “check the box” with each network?!

had biden been subjected to that many interviews? [granted, would anyone have given two craps if he was, but that's beside the point ... ]

Buckaroo on September 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM

Oh brother. I can already see the smirky half smile on Katie’s face. I don’t see her as a woman who enjoys seeing other women, (esp. republican women) do well.

anniekc on September 16, 2008 at 1:10 PM

Like I said in the headlines: bring your own camera crew, Mrs. Palin.

Lehosh on September 16, 2008 at 1:10 PM

I think we can pretty much bet the house on Couric being hostile, and an advocate for the other side. She often argues the leftist side of an argument when she’s interviewing a conservative.

I just hope it’s not hacked up like the ABC interview was. If we get to see Governor Palin’s entire answers, she’ll do great. Some of the better parts of her responses to Gibson ended up on the cutting room floor.

capitalist piglet on September 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM

Also- Why did they go with Sean Hannity instead of Brit Hume? No one will take Hannity seriously.

anniekc on September 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM

Perky Katie has a choice, because she WILL ne watched because of Palin’s popularity….be fair and get a new batch of viewers….or go into Carry Barry mode and alienate the people who already had given her their back.

sven10077 on September 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM

Sarah will do well. She doesn’t need to let perky Couric get her off on smears and garbage like that. Sarah-Barracuda needs to hit the details of what she and McCain plan to do and she needs to be very clear on what changes will be made.

AubieJon on September 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM

“And no garbage edits, CBS.”

riiight, ’cause cbs news has NO history of misconduct during presidential campaigns …
[!]

/sorry for being a downer here, but these interviews are lose-lose all the way down the line — have her appear at campaign stops, mebbe a handful of prssers on the plane etc., but we’re jus’ asking for trouble with these …

Buckaroo on September 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM

She appeared on Sean Hannity’s show last night…

She did? I know she’s supposed to do an interview that will air starting Wednesday, but I don’t remember seeing or hearing her on Hannity…

powerpro on September 16, 2008 at 1:12 PM

Has Katy interviewed Obama yet?

Beto Ochoa on September 16, 2008 at 1:12 PM

Palin did well enough with Gibson, but she needs to do some work as well for this appearance. Palin needs to understand how important this interview will be to Couric and CBS, where their news broadcast regularly runs last in the standings. Couric will want to come across as a heavyweight and not a soft, Today-show interviewer, so Palin has to avoid underestimating Couric. She’s had her first major interview, and she won’t get any slack for being a rookie. Palin has to be herself and not let Couric rattle her.

Did that remind anyone else of the Princess Bride ‘poison’ conversation?

dc84123 on September 16, 2008 at 1:12 PM

Well considering Katie’s sliding numbers she has to put on a massive attack just to get the ratings.

If I was the McCain campaign I would treat this interveiw like it was being given by the DailyKos.

William Amos on September 16, 2008 at 1:13 PM

Don’t worry, she’ll be perky as ever.

Kokonut on September 16, 2008 at 1:13 PM

Hey, Allah. Got a question for you.

Do you know if the McCain-Palin campaign managers ever read Hot Air, Michelle Malkin, and other blogs to get some ideas from their loyal constituents?

Kokonut on September 16, 2008 at 1:15 PM

another female pioneer. Katie Couric “?

Not really. There was Barbara WahWah and a few others. OK, they weren’t made anchors of the nightly news, but it’s difficult to think of anything Katie has done that was truly original.

She sounds like a chipmunk (a snarky one at that), so maybe that makes her unique as a news anchor.

Cody1991 on September 16, 2008 at 1:15 PM

Maybe Palin should apologize for Team McCain’s ad team for using her statements in their ad…

Team McCain needs to shake up and sexy up their domestic policy… they need to make nudge hard on exercise and recreation and make their health care policy one of their top draws… email me yarrrr@mail.com

ninjapirate on September 16, 2008 at 1:16 PM

She appeared on Hannity?

lodge on September 16, 2008 at 1:16 PM

Eventually, Palin will have to do an interview with NBC, either with Tom Brokaw or Brian Williams, and probably Wolf Blitzer at CNN.

Why?

These interviews will have more impact than the VP debate in terms of impact on the ticket …

Who says?

Blake on September 16, 2008 at 1:17 PM

Do you know if the McCain-Palin campaign managers ever read Hot Air, Michelle Malkin, and other blogs

I know McCain reads Drudge everyday

lodge on September 16, 2008 at 1:17 PM

Palin wasn’t on Hannity last night. They had to delay the interview a day due to the hurricane. It won’t air until Wednesday and Thursday.

Enoxo on September 16, 2008 at 1:17 PM

Count on Couric to ask about diaper changes and quality time. I’d expect nothing less from CBS. Hard hitting claptrap.

Limerick on September 16, 2008 at 1:17 PM

Kokonut on September 16, 2008 at 1:15 PM

Ed wrote this post…

Lehosh on September 16, 2008 at 1:18 PM

Also- Why did they go with Sean Hannity instead of Brit Hume? No one will take Hannity seriously.

anniekc on September 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM

intelligent people do even if you libtards do not

bill30097 on September 16, 2008 at 1:18 PM

Until, and unless, the McCain campaign wises up and insists on a live interview or no edits the Obama media will continue to chop up Palin’s answers to make her look stupid.

I’m beginning to think the campaign’s approach to media is what’s stupid. It’s maddening.

Lynn2008 on September 16, 2008 at 1:18 PM

I think Katie Couric is a decent. I’m sure she will be as fair as possible for someone working at CBS News.

She appeared on Hannity?

I was wondering the same thing. The video is no up at FoxNews.com

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:19 PM

“Kokonut on September 16, 2008 at 1:15 PM”

the JSM camp has stated they read some blogs & news sites [rcp among them, iirc], not sure if HA has ever been explicitly identified by a campaign operative tho …

Buckaroo on September 16, 2008 at 1:19 PM

Uh-oh.

Isn’t Katie a big Chevy Chase fan???

pherrman on September 16, 2008 at 1:19 PM

Hey, Allah. Got a question for you.

Do you know if the McCain-Palin campaign managers ever read Hot Air, Michelle Malkin, and other blogs to get some ideas from their loyal constituents?

Kokonut on September 16, 2008 at 1:15 PM

Someone in the campaign reads NRO Corner; a few times in the past there has been a quick response to something posted on McCain that they wanted to correct or clarify.

Wethal on September 16, 2008 at 1:19 PM

Blah, who cares. Couric is now a wannabe morning show has-been.

Need I say more?

upinak on September 16, 2008 at 1:20 PM

“Blake on September 16, 2008 at 1:17 PM”

2 very good questions!

Buckaroo on September 16, 2008 at 1:20 PM

These interviews will have more impact than the VP debate in terms of impact on the ticket, and gives the McCain/Palin ticket a great opportunity to extend the Palin phenomenon in the race.

I don’t understand the reasoning behind this statement. The VP debate will likely have a huge audience, and can easily reverse all but the most egregious gaffes or most boffo performances in media interviews. Of course, the most likely result is that Palin will be Palin – at best marginally affecting the quickset view of her which I would argue is, fairly or unfairly, that right now she’s slightly less qualified than the Dems’ #1 to be “President on Day One” (more experienced as an executive, less familiar with the topics). Since “Day One” for her is at absolute earliest a few months from now, and quite possibly never going to occur at all, the argument doesn’t count for much.

What’s left over is 1) trench warfare on base mobilization and the like, 2) the altered structure of the race, with Palin helping McCain stake a claim in the most flippable Democratic and independent constituencies, and McCain-Palin competing with Obama-Biden for the “change” mantle, something which prior to the VP picks and the conventions hardly seemed possible. Most everything else strictly on the level of campaigning (i.e., excluding potential game-changing exogenous events) is noise or at most battlefield preparation. Whether or not Couric cuts Palin a break or Palin shines with Blitzer is fairly minor, even if it does give us something to talk about for a day or two.

CK MacLeod on September 16, 2008 at 1:20 PM

intelligent people do even if you libtards do not

bill30097 on September 16, 2008 at 1:18 PM

I don’t take hannity seriously. He’s a tool. Hume would have been a far better choice.

As for Couric. Look, if Palin doesn’t go a lot, and I mean a lot, better this interview, I’d watch McCain’s poll numbers start dropping. She needs to take this thing seriously.

lorien1973 on September 16, 2008 at 1:20 PM

Anita on September 16, 2008 at 1:14 PM

Looks like that whole “lack of experience” mantra isn’t working out so well. I guess it’s time to take the gloves off and really get tough with her.

a capella on September 16, 2008 at 1:20 PM

Count on Couric to ask about diaper changes and quality time. I’d expect nothing less from CBS. Hard hitting claptrap.

Why do you say that? I thought Couric asked Sen. Obama some good questions.

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:21 PM

A Palin and Tim Russert interview would have been nice to see :(

Marc01 on September 16, 2008 at 1:21 PM

I’m sure Couric will bring up the use of her comment in the McCain ad saying something about sexism in the presidential election race.

Dash on September 16, 2008 at 1:22 PM

Also- Why did they go with Sean Hannity instead of Brit Hume? No one will take Hannity seriously.

anniekc on September 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM

Awwww, I guess you’re just not a great American! In all seriousness, I agree with you–Hannity doesn’t exactly appeal to independents.

m064404 on September 16, 2008 at 1:22 PM

Hannity (I believe) recorded his interview this morning. At least from hearing him on radio Monday, the impression I had is that he’ll have stuff on the air the next couple of days.

either orr on September 16, 2008 at 1:23 PM

I was wondering the same thing. The video is no up at FoxNews.com

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:19 PM

To air in two parts, tonight and tomorrow, I believe.

CK MacLeod on September 16, 2008 at 1:23 PM

I know McCain reads Drudge everyday

lodge on September 16, 2008 at 1:17 PM

I thought he didn’t know how to use computers??

SARCASM

Rick on September 16, 2008 at 1:23 PM

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:21 PM

When Hillary was still chasing his bus, yes. Now? I expect a full on hit piece from CBS. They must give their flagship (kaf*hak) 60 Minutos some cannon fodder.

Limerick on September 16, 2008 at 1:23 PM

The interview on Hannity was originally scheduled for tonight (Tuesday), but got pushed back to Wednesday and Thursday. Not sure if it was originally scheduled for two days or not.

Todd Palin was on Greta last night.

mwdiver on September 16, 2008 at 1:23 PM

The campaign should insist on unedited video. What’s the MSM going to do, complain that they aren’t being allowed to censor her?

NellE on September 16, 2008 at 1:23 PM

I don’t take hannity seriously. He’s a tool. Hume would have been a far better choice.

lorien1973 on September 16, 2008 at 1:20 PM

The problem with Hannity is that it’s all talking points. There’s no depth to his arguments, and at times he shows a lot of intellectual dishonesty. He’s nowhere near as bad as KO, but his style is the other side of the same coin.

BadgerHawk on September 16, 2008 at 1:24 PM

m064404 on September 16, 2008 at 1:22 PM

Amazingly enough, Hannity is doing quite well these days with PUMAs.

either orr on September 16, 2008 at 1:24 PM

BTW, Gibson and now Couric? Did Team McCain think these people are going friendly or something? This is stupid, they should put her out in front of random reporters…

ninjapirate on September 16, 2008 at 1:25 PM

had biden been subjected to that many interviews? [granted, would anyone have given two craps if he was, but that's beside the point ... ]

Buckaroo on September 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM

Exactly my sentiments! O’Reilly was on with Newt last night and was suggesting that Palin is nothing but fluff or an unknown, untested commodity until she comes into The No Spin Zone! Where is the Biden demand from Bill? And all this doo-doo from Bill about Biden being a known quantity is just that, doo-doo! Many Americans do NOT know who Biden is, his voting history, his connections to lobbyists, his participation in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and not to mention his failures regarding foreign policy! If so many folks are more comfortable with Biden possibly being the POTUS and not THE ONE or Palin, then I suggest O’Reilly needs to hammer Biden while waiting for Palin.

Couric had also better watch it because the blow back from the Gibson interview is doing nothing but helping the McCain/Palin ticket. Palin must watch her responses because it could come across catty if she is too aggressive.

freeus on September 16, 2008 at 1:26 PM

Limerick on September 16, 2008 at 1:23 PM

No, Couric did the interview while Obama was in Iraq. It was after Hillary was out.

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:26 PM

BadgerHawk on September 16, 2008 at 1:24 PM

Yep. Hannity is totally unwatchable. He’s a terrible debater too. When the other side leaves him a great comeback, he moves on to another point. and looks stupid in the process.

It’s funny when liberals say that the show is all about hannity. Yeah, its all about Hannity looking stupid.

lorien1973 on September 16, 2008 at 1:26 PM

Is there any potential for b!tchslapping? I bet Sarah could give a mean right cross.

/sarc

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on September 16, 2008 at 1:28 PM

“What’s the MSM going to do, complain that they aren’t being allowed to censor her?”

well, they’re surely arrogant enough to, they jus’ prolly won’t use those exact words …
:-)

Buckaroo on September 16, 2008 at 1:28 PM

Did Team McCain think these people are going friendly or something? This is stupid, they should put her out in front of random reporters…

No. She has to do these interviews because the three major broadcast networks (ABC, NBC, CBS) get the most news viewers. If she doesn’t do the interviews it will appear she’s not ready to answer tough questions.

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:29 PM

“Dr.Cwac.Cwac on September 16, 2008 at 1:28 PM”

dream big dude!
:-)

Buckaroo on September 16, 2008 at 1:29 PM

freeus on September 16, 2008 at 1:26 PM

Couric is a woman. If Couric treats Palin the same way, ain’t gonna be no blowback. Palin needs to win this on her own. With what she believes and articulate it well.

lorien1973 on September 16, 2008 at 1:29 PM

I would not have given Couric an interview. I think it’s hard to shine when you’re being interviewed by someone who is both adversarial and not particularly bright. It’s like trying to land a punch on a cloud – you get no purchase. Same phenomenon happens when Republicans are interviewed by Colmes. He’s such a dim bulb that he can’t understand their points, so the interview quickly hits an impasse with the interviewee having to just shrug off his questions.

Hannity is a nice enough guy, I guess, but I would still prefer to see her interviewed by Brit Hume. He has gravitas and would conduct an intelligent interview that would give Palin a chance to shine.

Of the MSM media, I guess I would have chosen Bob Schieffer.

Y-not on September 16, 2008 at 1:30 PM

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:26 PM

I stand corrected! I must have missed it but will look for it. My apologies on the rant.

Limerick on September 16, 2008 at 1:30 PM

I know McCain reads Drudge everyday

lodge on September 16, 2008 at 1:17 PM

Nah uh! He can’t internet, didnt ya see Obama’s ad?
/

carbon_footprint on September 16, 2008 at 1:30 PM

“three major broadcast networks (ABC, NBC, CBS) get the most news viewers”

actually Foxnews outdrew them at least one nite during convention week, so that talking point is fading fast [!]

Buckaroo on September 16, 2008 at 1:30 PM

BadgerHawk on September 16, 2008 at 1:24 PM

At least he has a counter (albeit a weak one) with Colmes…Ko has no counter at all and no conservative guests…

joepub on September 16, 2008 at 1:31 PM

I believe Sarah is a strong woman and will have NO PROBLEM handling a twinkie like Katie Cupcake. The Gibson interview confirmed to Palin that the questions are not about informing the people about policy. The questions will be framed to put her in a negative light.

Would love to see SP tell Katie that she realizes now the MSM is an extension of the Obama campaign and call Katie out on her own obvious bias.

Couric’s square head would explode.

Good TV.

DeweyWins on September 16, 2008 at 1:32 PM

I think it’s hard to shine when you’re being interviewed by someone who is both adversarial and not particularly bright.

It’s exactly the opposite. If you can defend yourself, in the face of the adversary and come across well, you always win.

How do you think Reagan won all the time?

Palin needs to learn her stuff and say it. She didn’t in Gibson’s interview. Face facts people. If Palin had hit a home run during the Gibson interview, media coverage would be totally different this week re:palin. She’d be topic #1. Right now, she’s relegated to page 3 or 4.

lorien1973 on September 16, 2008 at 1:32 PM

I’m sure after the interview we can have a contrast/compare with Katie’s soft-porn interview with Hillary.

carbon_footprint on September 16, 2008 at 1:32 PM

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:29 PM

I’m glad someone else remembers Couric’s interview with Obama in Iraq. She was tough on him, and the nutroots hated her for it. She’s going to tough on Palin too to make up for it.

BadgerHawk on September 16, 2008 at 1:32 PM

Obama needs a cone of silence.
*
It’s called a dunce cap.

marklmail on September 16, 2008 at 1:32 PM

People still watch CBS News?

Mr_Magoo on September 16, 2008 at 1:33 PM

had biden been subjected to that many interviews? [granted, would anyone have given two craps if he was, but that's beside the point ... ]

Buckaroo on September 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM

Biden did the presidential debates and he is regular guest on ‘Meet the Press.’ So it’s not the same.

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:33 PM

Who’s watching Katie Couric’s kids. Whoooo?

vcferlita on September 16, 2008 at 1:33 PM

I’m sure after the interview we can have a contrast/compare with Katie’s soft-porn interview with Hillary.

carbon_footprint on September 16, 2008 at 1:32 PM

MY EYES! MY EYES!

Mr_Magoo on September 16, 2008 at 1:34 PM

At least he has a counter (albeit a weak one) with Colmes…Ko has no counter at all and no conservative guests…

joepub on September 16, 2008 at 1:31 PM

Which is why I said he is nowhere near as bad. I listened to his radio show every day when I lived down south, because it’s what was on. His arguments are shallow and talking point oriented, and I don’t think they do anything to persuade people who aren’t conservatives to begin with.

BadgerHawk on September 16, 2008 at 1:34 PM

Cat scratch fever.

Kini on September 16, 2008 at 1:35 PM

Oh that reminds she should probably go on Meet the Press right away and get those tough questions out of the way.

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:36 PM

Oh that reminds she should probably go on Meet the Press right away and get those tough questions out of the way.

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:36 PM

Tough call. Answer the really tough questions before you’re completely used to the interview circuit or risk having a major gaffe too close to election day…

BadgerHawk on September 16, 2008 at 1:37 PM

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:36 PM

She isn’t ready for that. She needs to ace a one on one before she can handle it with someone else sitting next to her.

I don’t want to be in a position where the VP candidate needs to coddled. Man. Why wasn’t she better prepared for Gibson?

I think that interview really threw McCain off his stride. He expected her to do better, I know it.

lorien1973 on September 16, 2008 at 1:38 PM

Great news on Palin agreeing to the Couric interview. It DOES keep her in the news and I Guarantee you.. JOE BIDEN wishes he was getting the airplay that the Governor is getting.

Sarah has time for a lot of prep work, after all, she’s had her kid population reduced by 20% with her son going off to war for us.

Maybe she should ask Katie if SHE is going to encourage HER children to join our military.

She handled herself favorably to Gibson and Couric CAN BE a tough interviewer when she doesn’t agree with their positions (read: Republicans) I’d bet Sarah is better this time than last. That’s the good thing, she get’s better every time and if you look at her debate work that’s out there, she is VERY GOOD.

originalpechanga on September 16, 2008 at 1:38 PM

intelligent people do even if you libtards do not

bill30097 on September 16, 2008 at 1:18 PM

bill30097,

I think a lot of us on this post aren’t impressed by Hannity. No need to call us libtards.

Personally, I like his radio show better than his tv schtick. Colmes is so dumb that it would be hard for W. F. Buckley to look good next to him.

Y-not on September 16, 2008 at 1:38 PM

Palin has to be herself and not let Couric rattle her.

Yes! Sarah must be prepared for questions like this:

Governor Palin, as the owner of a tanning bed, do you worry that you are only one melanoma away from the Presidency?

Buy Danish on September 16, 2008 at 1:43 PM

Also- Why did they go with Sean Hannity instead of Brit Hume? No one will take Hannity seriously.

anniekc on September 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM

Not enough vag mops.

exlibris on September 16, 2008 at 1:44 PM

This is a good move by the McCain/Palin team.

No it’s not. Just like McCain going on The View was a super stupid idea.

No communications professional would put their client in a situation where the interviewer would deliberately try to sandbag them. This what’s happening.

GOP listen up. The Gibson interview and editing is absolute proof that even the more mature members of the MSM are out to destroy this woman. She is their Moby Dick. Katie Couric is desperate to keep her $15M a year job and knows that the best way for her to improve her ratings is to be the person who tripped up Palin.

friendly-turf chats don’t count when arguing against the supposed “cone of silence” that McCain allegedly dropped on Palin.

And you think the “cone of silence” and the woman behind the curtain meme is gonna end? There is no end to this game. The press won’t drop this until Palin holds a daily press briefing every day.

Eventually, Palin will have to do an interview with NBC, either with Tom Brokaw or Brian Williams, and probably Wolf Blitzer at CNN.

It’s not in the constitution so she doesn’t have to do it. I wouldn’t put her on camera with Brokaw and his Jesus was a community organizer button.

CanadianGuy on September 16, 2008 at 1:44 PM

Palin took a shot in the Gibson interview. I know that’s not how the readers here might see it, but that’s the way the MSM sees it. The only thing that “stuck” from that interview was “Bush Doctrine, blah, blah, blah”. So the way they see it that was Charlie’s trophy.

You can be damn sure Katie wants her own trophy. I don’t know what it will be. There won’t be any “How does it feel to be the first Republican woman VP candidate? There will be no woman to woman sympathy. Katie may not play the role of professor trying to put the student in her place, but you can be damn sure she’ll be hostile.

rockhead on September 16, 2008 at 1:44 PM

I don’t want to be in a position where the VP candidate needs to coddled. Man. Why wasn’t she better prepared for Gibson?

I would say Gibson was not prepared either. I predict Couric will be the same. Her questions will be based on inaccuracies and, because she is not a particularly thoughtful person, when Palin corrects her or attempts to get her to clarify her questions (as she did several times with Gibson) Couric will react like Gibson did and behave defensively. The edited version will portray Palin as evasive.

I think that if you are a smart person it is always better to engage in a debate with another smart person.

Question for the group: Who is the smartest MSM person out there right now?

I think Andrea Mitchell thinks she’s smart, but I’ve seen her speak in person and she is sort of like Obama, wandering mind.

Y-not on September 16, 2008 at 1:49 PM

Also- Why did they go with Sean Hannity instead of Brit Hume? No one will take Hannity seriously.

anniekc on September 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM

Whatever your opinion of him, Hannity’s done significant work in exposing Obama’s highly questionable background, from Jeremiah Wright to William Ayers and more.

His core audience is very interested in Palin so even if it’s panned by the usual media suspects as a softer, less-hostile encounter it’s win-win for both him and the McCain campaign. Since this interview will surely lead to huge ratings there may also be an element of “thank you” involved due to the nonstop pressure Hannity’s kept up on the opposition.

Gilda on September 16, 2008 at 1:49 PM

The only real criticism I have of Palin from the Gibson interview is that she treated him civilly and with respect while he was openly hostile, condescending and inaccurate.

I expect more of this with Couric, who has been one of the lead “Palin Truthers” and openly spreading blatantly false accusations (aka BS straight fom Daily Kos without even rudimentary fact checking) and has continued to cites these accusation even after they are debunked.

Palin needs to get better about handling a hostile interview and beating the interviewer down when they are openly attacking her with false statements.

Someone on another site also pointed out that she needs to weave her counter argument together better to avoid the editing issue that was overtly obvious and slanted in the Gibson interview. She made the mistake there of giving an answer that supported Gibson’s statement, then elaborating on it, thus allowing it to be edited out to their “preferred” answer.

Damiano on September 16, 2008 at 1:50 PM

Well I hope she aces it. I think she will. Then Katie can go on after the segment and whine, “what happened?” like she did on Wed. morning after Kerry lost in 2004! HA!

JAM on September 16, 2008 at 1:51 PM

Question for the group: Who is the smartest MSM person out there right now?

Y-not on September 16, 2008 at 1:49 PM

Hume? I’d be tempted to say Kelly, but she hasn’t been around long enough to have the gravitas to match her smarts.

BadgerHawk on September 16, 2008 at 1:51 PM

Who is the smartest MSM person out there right now?

Chris Wallace

BacaDog on September 16, 2008 at 1:53 PM

Who is the smartest MSM person out there right now?

I don’t know who the smartest. However, from the major television news networks I think Tom Brokaw does decent job of interviewing. Too bad that had to pull out of retirement because NBC doesn’t have any decent political reporters to handle Meet the Press. It’s actually sorta sad.

terryannonline on September 16, 2008 at 1:55 PM

Question for the group: Who is the smartest MSM person out there right now?

Y-not on September 16, 2008 at 1:49 PM

From the traditional media: John Stossel. If cable news is included it’s either him or Brit Hume.

Gilda on September 16, 2008 at 1:55 PM

Hume? I’d be tempted to say Kelly, but she hasn’t been around long enough to have the gravitas to match her smarts.

BadgerHawk on September 16, 2008 at 1:51 PM

YES, I agree! Brit is the best. Abso-freekin-lootly! I wasn’t counting him because he’s on Fox.

Let me rephrase: Who is the smartest network (ABC, NBC, CBS) reporter/anchor/talking head?

Y-not on September 16, 2008 at 1:56 PM

I think Andrea Mitchell thinks she’s smart, but I’ve seen her speak in person and she is sort of like Obama, wandering mind.

Y-not on September 16, 2008 at 1:49 PM

Andrea Mitchell thinks she’s smart b/c she’s married to Alan Greenspan. She’s turned into the female version of Olbermann.

JAM on September 16, 2008 at 1:56 PM

I disagree that Palin has to interview with NBC or CNN.

In think that the McCain Palin ticket should simply ignore those networks unless and until they start providing objective journalism.

NBC has marginalized itself with its petulant teenage stepchild, MSNBC, and CNN is a continuous hit piece against Palin with no analysis of Obama Biden whatsoever.

Check out this Week’s National Review titled “Obama’s Pet Peacock” (with a picture of the NBC mascot).

If NBC and CNN choose to not behave like journalists are supposed to act, McCain and Palin shouldn’t grace them with interviews.

molonlabe28 on September 16, 2008 at 1:57 PM

“BacaDog on September 16, 2008 at 1:53 PM”
seconded!

Buckaroo on September 16, 2008 at 1:57 PM

Why does everyone believe that Biden needs to or will watch his condescending and “aggressive” behavior? (I put “aggressive” in quotes because he’s more a flailer than an attacker.) Because of what happened to Lazio? Um, look at all the media/left have been doing to Sarah since she walked on the national stage. If (rather when) Biden makes an ass of himself with his “nerd fighting” style of attacks the media/left will stand up and say, “She wanted to play with the big boys and got hit. Serves her right and good for him.”

srhoades on September 16, 2008 at 2:00 PM

Actually, if “Kouric is not especially bright”, that might let Sarah shine, as she points out what Katie missed. She would be less likely to be stumped by a “gotcha” question.

But Palin must INSIST that the entire interview be broadcast, without edits. From the transcript, she didn’t do badly in the Gibson interview, but the edits cut out some of her best and most detailed answers. In some cases, ABC showed a Gibson question, then edited out her answer and played her answer to a later question, which led the viewers to believe Palin wasn’t answering the question, when she was in fact answering a DIFFERENT question!

Katie Couric has interviewed Obama, in Iraq. She was surprisingly tough on his obstinate refusal to believe the “troop surge” was a good idea, even in hindsight, which made Obama look illogical, at best. Sarah Palin will probably look brilliant in comparison!

Steve Z on September 16, 2008 at 2:02 PM

Couric has been beaten up by the “boys” in her business. This is the time where she proves she can be just as corrupt and deceitful with no regards for the truth as they can be. Sarah, above all others, should know you can’t sit with a rabid dog without being bit. Couric, despite her diminutive stature, has very sharp teeth.

volsense on September 16, 2008 at 2:03 PM

srhoades on September 16, 2008 at 2:00 PM

Right. And that’s the way it should be. The last thing she needs is to be a victim.

BacaDog on September 16, 2008 at 2:04 PM

Comment pages: 1 2