Why the Hopemonger has faded
posted at 10:45 am on September 15, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | regular view
Politico notes a change in direction for Barack Obama that reeks of desperation, as well as a tendency to listen to the worst advice coming from his party. The Hopemonger has departed, Carrie Budoff Brown reports, replaced with a drearily recognizable Democratic presidential archetype, the kind that lost the last two elections to George Bush. Obama has traded in his one positive asset in this campaign, and for a very specific reason:
The “hopemonger” is gone.
Barack Obama sounds more like a man trying to shake a rain cloud these days, dispensing a teeth-clenching, I-get-your-pain stump speech in town after town that offers only snippets of the unbridled optimism that long permeated his campaign pitch.
Beginning in the days before his party’s convention, the inspirational has given way to the traditional: attacks on John McCain, a register of policy prescriptions and partisan language with the sting of a needle. …
“You assured voters in New Hampshire, as well as the rest of the country, that you would not tolerate the Republican attack ads and smear campaign that has come to really dominate politics,” doctoral student Glenn Grasso, 39, told Obama at a town hall meeting last week in Concord. “So for those of us who have given you our support and more importantly our money, when and how are you going to start fighting back?”
Acknowledging that some of his supporters were nervous, Obama responded that he was hitting hard but that he would not get into the mud.
He managed to blow that promise as well, issuing a remarkably stupid and poorly researched attack ad on McCain’s inability to send an e-mail, which hardly sounds like a deal-breaker for a man who flew Navy jets for decades in his nation’s defense. As it turned out, McCain knows how to send e-mail but can’t handle the keyboard duties because of his injuries from his torture as a POW in Vietnam. A simple Google search would have revealed this, and Team O’s failure to research it made them look like the Internet incompetents.
However, Brown misses a major point in this sudden ditching of the “Hopemonger”. Obama ran as an outsider, whose utter lack of experience got outweighed by his ability to bring change and reform. Unfortunately, Obama has never shown any evidence for that proposal, which has made that theme wear thin, and McCain has effectively attacked it. Obama himself and his Democratic allies stuck a stake through its heart by attacking Sarah Palin as inexperienced, when she had more relevant experience as an executive and done more to fight corruption than Obama ever has.
Sarah Palin sucked all of the oxygen out of the presidential campaign for more than two weeks, leaving Obama unable to answer at all, let alone effectively. Why has she dominated the news cycles? People forget that she’s the first new face in this 20-month campaign in over a year. Obama could have benefited from picking a fresh face as his running mate in a similar manner, such as Kathleen Sebelius or Tim Kaine. Instead, he bypassed the much more experienced Bill Richardson to pick Joe Biden, who wasn’t even a fresh face in 1987 when he plagiarized his way out of his first run for the Presidency.
Obama has had to turn back towards his base rather than make a play for independents and centrists. The base has begun to get dispirited, if not outright mutinous, and Obama needs an enthusiastic effort to win battleground states. Instead, he’s begun to fade in formerly safe states like Minnesota and New York, and Pennsylvania and Michigan may have already slipped through his fingers.
Make no mistake about it. Obama may claim this as going on the offensive, but this is a purely defensive move that ignores his one major theme: being different enough to transcend partisanship. John McCain has pushed him out of his comfort zone and forced him to play this election by McCain’s rules, and apparently he isn’t adept enough to figure that out for himself.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
You are making the presumption that whatever the Democrats and MSM pull as their October surprise will actually be based on facts. In 2004, as we all recall, they made their attack out of whole cloth…
18-1 on September 15, 2008 at 12:26 PM
That is because the argument flies in the face of the McCain everyone has known for all these years. For an attack to work there has to be an element of truth.
McCain=Bush just causes head scratching and puzzeled looks.
petunia on September 15, 2008 at 12:30 PM
It certainly seems like the Obama campaign has been doing everything in its power to get people to vote for McCain. McCain has plenty of faults, but attacking him for the injuries he received in the service of his nation? This is a new low in presidential politics.
In fact I seem to recall that Ann Coulter made a more mild version of this attack on a Dem legislator a few years ago, and the left went wild. Perhaps McCain should cut an add with Dem talking heads talking about that?
18-1 on September 15, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Yeah, but it didn’t work.
I think it’s one of the most amazing things that Bush was re-elected, despite the political forces aligned against him, the blatant dirty tricks pulled by the dems, and the challenges of being President in the post 9-11 era.
I guess I am at my core an optimist. I think people are connecting with Palin and McCain on a level that will help them recognize baseless smears for what they are. Palin has helped bring out McCain’s fatherly side. He beams when he looks at her, like a proud dad. It may sound trite, but people want to be protected. Thanks to some assinine things Michelle O! said early on, noone believes Obama will protect us. “He’ll make you work.”
Y-not on September 15, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Hopemonger is hilarious.
If BO still thinks he can win this election, he’s going to have to act like he’s going to win and offer something of substance. If he stays the same or keeps coming off as desperate and continues to lack confidence he will keep slipping.
MrsWeebork on September 15, 2008 at 12:34 PM
You know the oddest thing about the McSame attack line? Any number of leftists seem to actually believe it. I understand that the power of groupthink is strong on the left…but have they been asleep the last 8 years?
18-1 on September 15, 2008 at 12:35 PM
That’s true…but had Burkett/Rather/whoever made the fakes actually used a real typewriter the truth may not have gotten out in time. Picking a dead man’s correspondence as a means of attack was brilliant in many ways. Obviously, he couldn’t say these were fakes. And as we’ve seen with the Palin smears, the media has abandoned any pretense of objectivity they might have had in 2004…
18-1 on September 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM
I hope that article ends up having legs but I was doing some (is it called trolling?) And there are those that claim he didn’t do any of this secretly that he made a speech on the tarmack while he was still in Iraq out-lining what is in that article… so that may make a difference.
Although, to me going to a foreign country and saying publically that a sitting President is too weak politically to be trusted… is pretty much treason in and of itself.
What is the timing of that speech? Did Putin read it and decide it was the best time to invade Georgia? What other international consequences are there when a canidate for President announces to the world that our President is losing power over the government.
Obama pronounced Bush more than a lame duck… he said he is a dead duck… That’s got to slow progress on every diplomatic effort.
petunia on September 15, 2008 at 12:40 PM
Liberals cannot understand conservatives.
You might find this post at neoneocon of interest:
Y-not on September 15, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Okay, please excuse my idiotness. Somewhere someone said something about that NYPost article… I thought I copied and quoted it, but alas…. therefore, my above post makes contextual point. But I still like my points…
petunia on September 15, 2008 at 12:43 PM
They have been anything but asleep. They having been making up lies for eachother’s entertainment… and calling to impeach Bush randomly. They do believe what they are saying. They truly live in a fantasy world where Bush and Cheney are the absolute worst criminal element of society. I don’t know where the hate comes from. But it is real.
petunia on September 15, 2008 at 12:46 PM
It was an interesting paper. I followed up an filled out some of the surveys he links to. Two questions I found fascinating;
How do you think conservatives/liberals came to be conservatives/liberals? I would love to see his results there…heck, it would make a good Hot Air thread. :)
It is mystifying. Bush is not a liberal, obviously, so I can understand why they have policy disagreements with him, and even dislike him. But in office he hasn’t pursued a particularly conservative line, and he really did try and reach out to the other side, in fact about as much as one could hope for from a politican on the other side of the aisle.
And as for liberals drinking their own koolaide on “McSame” – can’t any of them take a step back…really?
18-1 on September 15, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Hardly. They won ‘06 on BDS. It’s the only thing they have. Someone should tell Bill Burton that it’s not working anymore though.
Connie on September 15, 2008 at 1:10 PM
Barack, The whiny One, is a the glass is half empty type guy.
TooTall on September 15, 2008 at 1:17 PM
The liberal democrats feel a sense of entitlement about holding power. They really cannot grasp that Bush won both elections fairly, so that’s why they hate him. They really believe that guys like Karl Rove are evil geniuses who steal elections on behalf of morons like Bush (W), Reagan, and now McCain-Palin.
Liberals live in a bubble of their own making. Clinton (and Global Warming Gore, too) was so popular overseas that they believed that he was equally popular here. Sure, they know that people voted for Bush but they dismiss those folks as unintelligent sheep who were manipulated by evil geniuses. They do not accept that an intelligent person can be conservative. That belief is never challenged because in day-to-day life, on the job or in social situations, the conservatives they do know keep their mouths shut rather than be ridiculed and worse.
I worked on my first political campaign when I was 10 years old (we can argue about how sophisticated my grasp of the issues was back then, but looking back, I think I had picked the right candidate) and continued working elections through college. 99% of my friends were liberals. We argued but listened to each other’s points of view and did not chalk up disagreements to lack of intelligence. Then, I went to graduate school (mid- to late-80’s) where I was surrounded by people who said the most condescending, outrageous things about anyone with a conservative viewpoint. During the 20 or so years while I was in academe I kept my mouth shut. Frankly, I did not want my career affected by my politics.
I think it is very telling that one of the biggest knocks on Reagan, and later Bush (W), was that they were mentally defective (senile, dumb). Now they are using that same theme against McCain and Palin — one is senile, the other is dumb.
If you underestimate your adversary, you are doomed to fail.
At least I hope so!
Y-not on September 15, 2008 at 1:20 PM
Has anyone read the NY Post story about how Obama tried to get the Iraqi’s to wait until after the election to talk about troop with drawl’s because he doesn’t want Pres. Bush to get any credit for a victory?
tee866 on September 15, 2008 at 1:50 PM
More and more, he’s turning into a glass jaw type of guy.
MarkTheGreat on September 15, 2008 at 1:54 PM
Aside from Michelle and his white, typical grandmother advising him, John Kerry is advising BO how to respond and attack the swiftboating smears. They always go back to losers for advice, like Bob Shrum, Kerry, Carter. Why is that?
George Clooney’s daily briefings don’t seem to be helping either. What a dolt.
luvstotango on September 15, 2008 at 1:58 PM
So far, relatively unsubstantiated. Wait for a second source to independently confirm this before running with it. If it’s true as written, there will be confirmation coming.
There’s not enough time left to afford many stumbles — if there’s a big outcry from the right about something that turns out to be a fake… we lose our credibility with the middle right when we need it the most.
ClintACK on September 15, 2008 at 2:51 PM
exactly, petunia. Lying about Bush and Repubs and conservatives is what gets them off. it’s catnip for……..them
Janos Hunyadi on September 15, 2008 at 3:32 PM
Look for Biden to find a way to “fall on his sword”, thus OBummer can (in desperation) tap someone else for the VP slot.
Look for it to happen just before the Oct. 2nd VP debate, so that the event will be conveniently canceled.
electric-rascal on September 15, 2008 at 10:09 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2