The latest Sarah Palin smear from the Left: teen molester
posted at 12:30 pm on September 13, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Just when you thought the Left could not possibly sink any lower in their bid to smear Sarah Palin, Nova M manages to provide what hopefully will be the nadir of their efforts. Randi Rhodes of Nova M Radio told her listeners that she knows Palin’s type — the type that can’t be trusted with teen boys in the neighborhood (via Brian Maloney):
She’s the woman who shows up at the kid’s birthday party and starts opining about everything from politics to lawn care. This is the woman that knows it all. Will shout you down, will get revenge on you. That’s who she is.
She’s friends with all the teenage boys. You have to say no when your kids say, ‘can we sleep over at the Palin’s? No! NO!’
Rhodes recently offered the novel claim that John McCain got treated like a “prince” by his captors in North Vietnam. Apparently her separation from reality has accelerated with this piece of character assassination. There’s really no other term for it; she accuses Palin of being at least a latent child molester.
Even apart from that despicable accusation, the rest of Rhodes’ argument sounds strangely like projection. What does Rhodes herself do for a living? She “opines about everything from politics to lawn care”. Rhodes also acts as though she “knows it all”, including Palin’s sexual proclivities. If Rhodes finds opinion from strong women so offensive, maybe she should find another line of work. After this bit of lunacy, perhaps her employer should expedite that change.
Update: Rhodes is exclusively on Nova M, and has been for several months. She is no longer on Air America.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
With the obvious support of Obama by the mainstream media and the unhinged attacks by the far left I think that we will not just see a movement to McCain in this election but also see a long-term swing towards conservatives for many years after this election is over.
dawgyear on September 13, 2008 at 1:58 PM
Awww, she’s just jealous of Rachael Meadows.
exdeadhead on September 13, 2008 at 1:58 PM
I enjoyed how Obama tried to justify his attendance at that convention in his O’Reilly interview.
Back to ads, McCain or some 527 needs to run a series of side-by-side comparisons of company that Obama and McCain keep with alternating authoritative voices echoing, “You will know them by the company that they keep.”
I’d enlist Fred Thompson, Gary Sinise (I think he’s conservative; he pro-military at least), Tammy Bruce, Michael Steele, chime in with others. For Obama, line up Wright, Ayers, Ayers’s wife, Rezko, Kwame Kilpatrick (worth a separate ad in Michigan). McCain’s can include immediately identifiable giants, including fellow POWs. If time permits, include the segment from the O’Reilly interview where Obama tried to hide behind knowing “thousands of people” and O’Reilly cut him off and said, “Senator, I know thousands of people and none of them are like these people.” And Obama sheepishly replied, “What can I tell you?”
Sorry, we all play guilt-by-association in our own relationships, and we evaluate our family members, friends, acquaitances, and especially our children along those lines. This kind of analysis helps us stay away from truly bad people. Having the welcome mat out for any and all is fine in a Christian ministry context, but taking such a naive approach to evaluating governmental leaders–heck, any leaders–is laughable. Democrats who expect anyone to buy the “give him the benefit of the doubt” argument need to join an encounter group. This is the United States, not Western Europe.
BuckeyeSam on September 13, 2008 at 1:58 PM
petunia:
This was the one thing that really concerned me about Palin, she has enemies and the whole Trooper thing is just sort of hanging out there. But I am not sure that anyone will perjure themselves just to harm her. I also doubt that McCain would have made her the VP candidate if he thought there was anything to this.
Terrye on September 13, 2008 at 1:59 PM
Damn she looks rough. Has she been getting in fights with sidewalks again?
thekingtut on September 13, 2008 at 1:59 PM
You know, that was the first thing that popped into my head…But this is ALPHIE after all….Probably got crossed up with the cherry picking/cut and paste thing…
BigWyo on September 13, 2008 at 2:00 PM
I know that politicians have a hard time suing, but this might be an exceptional case. Using public airwaves to call the state governor a child molester is no small potatoes, and should be immediately called out. This woman is an out-and-out scumbag. I really don’t like ad-hominem attacks, but that’s what she is: scum. I’ll bet she knows absolutely nothing about the governor (like Matt Damon), and yet she takes it upon herself to pronounce her a child molester, without a shred of evidence? No, she needs to see her day in court, and apologies shouldn’t cut it. Hopefully, she could get Mark Levin as her attorney.
Virus-X on September 13, 2008 at 2:01 PM
That’s all. Just leftist partisan craziness, not worthy of repeating.
Jaibones on September 13, 2008 at 2:02 PM
Cus’ lib geniuses think it wise to yank their feedbags off and give us a good look at them while they’re speaking?
Teddy on September 13, 2008 at 2:02 PM
20 yrs in Wright’s Church
Launched his political career at Bill Ayer’s House
Mentored by communists
JUDGMENT TO LEAD?
marklmail on September 13, 2008 at 2:03 PM
That’s all. Just leftist partisan craziness, not worthy of repeating.
Jaibones on September 13, 2008 at 2:02 PM
But they claim they are THE NEW MAINSTREAM! You mean, that’s not true??? ha ha ha ha
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 2:03 PM
Overstream’s Lie-ing King (different from the clip entitled Lyin’ King by HotAir):
http://www.overstream.net/view.php?oid=n1ronxelmtin
dtestard on September 13, 2008 at 2:04 PM
I have yet to hear Rhodes mention that Roger Mahony is running a CHILD SEX RING out of the L.A. Archdiocese….hmmmm
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 2:04 PM
Did someone say teen molester?
Obama’s mentor may know something about that.
heroyalwhyness on September 13, 2008 at 2:05 PM
…and nobody is supposed to use Barry’s middle name, huh?
Star20 on September 13, 2008 at 2:06 PM
Are Rachel Maddow and Randi Rhodes still………………………………………………………………….unmarried? ha ha ha
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 2:06 PM
Yes, and I think I must revise my quantification of how many it will take to turn publicly. I think if the Republicans remain a serious minority in either house, they will fall in line with McCain. At least publicly. They will want to maintain their constituents, but will enjoy a lot of publicity by being the fiscal conservative party. And, really, they won’t risk much because they will be so small.
However, if they are a bigger minority party (say in the 45% or greater) when they can get some of their own bills passed with some Democrat compatriots, they will be all about compromise. they will be protecting their seats by greasing the ear mark wheel and they will feel that stonewalling McCain is no risk. Even a good idea if they want Palin to get labeled with the “accomplish nothing” label that might have McCain/Palin on it. Worse, if they stick this crap in a supplemental bill at the very last moment, having run the military down to the dregs of its budget, they will force McCain to sign and reneg on his own promise of vetoing ear marks, painting Palin with it, too.
War would be over and they would not have to worry about a President Palin coming back in 2012 to do it all over again.
Kat_Mo on September 13, 2008 at 2:06 PM
Gallup and Rasmussen are up for today.
Gallup: McCain -1 to 47, Obama flat at 45
Rasmussen: steady on both sides
Polling through 9/12.
Damiano on September 13, 2008 at 2:08 PM
Look for Juan “Z-Visa” to drop if the AMNESTY ads continue…
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 2:09 PM
C’mon….she’s just making crap up out of thin air…..these are obviously her hackneyed impressions based on her ignorant hatred for Palin.
In other words…more please. This can only HELP Palin…..by hurting the other side…..
Joe Comment on September 13, 2008 at 2:09 PM
C’mon….she’s just making crap up out of thin air…..these are obviously her hackneyed impressions based on her ignorant hatred for Palin.
In other words…more please. This can only HELP Palin…..by hurting the other side…..
Joe Comment on September 13, 2008 at 2:09 PM
No….”The New Mainstream” is eating this stuff up like pi…hogs at the feeding trough…
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 2:12 PM
Piper’s Mom has got it goin’ on
She’s all I want and I’ve waited so long
Piper can’t you see
You’re just not the girl for me
I know it might be wrong but
I’m in love with Piper’s Mom…
Mr. Bingley on September 13, 2008 at 2:15 PM
I’m sorry. They are running out of ideas so badly they have to call on old TV super heroes to make pronouncements?
I guess the Obama camp is really feeling unable to defend themselves against Palin. they had to go tap Wonder woman to get it done. Apparently, the bionic woman and Super girl were too busy arm wrestling villainous space aliens.
Kat_Mo on September 13, 2008 at 2:16 PM
Randi Rhodes is one of the vilest creatures to ever hit the airwaves. This women literally oozes vitrol and hatred. I thought Air(head) America fired her a long while back. But then again, Air(head) America makes up in viciousness what HuffPo lacks.
pilamaye on September 13, 2008 at 2:18 PM
From the very first sentence of Ed’s post:
You seriously underestimate the cynicism of your audience, Ed. We ain’t seen nothin’ yet.
HerrMorgenholz on September 13, 2008 at 2:19 PM
…trying to cause infighting in the GOP?… like the friction between the real Democrats (Hillary Clinton supporters) and the far-left (Obama fans).
Do you think it’s working?
Today is a good day (wait, that’s every day since the announcement of Palin, but it just keeps getting better)
Moxie on September 13, 2008 at 2:20 PM
Didn’t Rachael Maddow get her PHD by doing a paper on….. are your ready….. AIDS in prison ….? Rachael and Randi…. two people who could make men put their eyes out. Ewwwww!
MNDavenotPC on September 13, 2008 at 2:22 PM
I’ve noticed this meme. She’s “scary”.
The liberals are “terrified” by sweet, pretty, capable Sarah Palin. And they’re right to be. She’s going to kick their jackasses.
capitalist piglet on September 13, 2008 at 2:23 PM
Why is it that all these liberal media women are so unattractive…hum…maybe that’s the explanation…
CCRWM on September 13, 2008 at 2:24 PM
Remember folks, if the Dems pass the Fairness Doctrine, the same stations that carry Rush, Hannity, etc., will be required to carry this dingbat and others of her ilk !!!
golfer39 on September 13, 2008 at 2:24 PM
For some reason, most women don’t care to be called the ‘c’ word. I’m trying to be humorous, but by and large they REALLY don’t like it. But if you call a guy a dick, not so bad. It’s like, “whatever”. And the left wants us to believe there are no differences between the genders!
Hehehehe. Ed said “female genitalia”. Hehehehehe.
Paul-Cincy on September 13, 2008 at 2:27 PM
Randi, your parents divorce WAS your fault.. now go get into therapy.. quick!
GoodBoy on September 13, 2008 at 2:31 PM
maybe Rodes all the details about being a child molester from 1st hand experience? maybe SHE’s the one who people need to protect their teenage boys from?
Remember the phrase :Take’s one to know one”
BruceB on September 13, 2008 at 2:33 PM
Here ya go, lean:
“Disparaging will not be tolerated—it is a form of child abuse,” the judge told a settlement hearing in October 2005, according to typed notes of the proceedings. The judge added: “Relatives cannot disparage either. If occurs [sic] the parent needs to set boundaries for their relatives.”
http://www.newsweek.com/id/158140
Quick!
Defend Palin’s child abuse!
alphie on September 13, 2008 at 2:36 PM
The Mitt Romney tantrums from the right don’t help either.
Happy Saturday to all.
redrock on September 13, 2008 at 2:37 PM
Stupid question time: Who was actually listening to this radio show to hear this rant?
darkpixel on September 13, 2008 at 2:40 PM
They suspended Rhodes after she called Hillary a “f-n’whore” at a radio station event in SF a few months ago, then she quit. Who listens to this garbage other than rabid America and conservative haters? In the NY Times Magazine article on Rush Limbaugh, Ira Glass of “This American Life” said he enjoys listening to Rush even though he disagrees with most everything he says, because Rush is entertaining.This woman couldn’t win amateur night at any comedy club, let alone host a national radio show.
ClericalGal on September 13, 2008 at 2:41 PM
Isn’t this the woman who got stumbling drunk one night then fell on her face and broke her teeth–then declared that she was attacked by conservative thugs and that is why her teeth are broken?
Ahh yes, the Liberals and their voice of reason.
Rhandi Rhodes
Michael Moore
Joy Behar
Jesse Jackson
Barack Obama
Montana on September 13, 2008 at 2:42 PM
alphie
I’ll defend it easily! badmouthing a slimy man who tasered his kid, is a drunk among established things is not child abuse. Because one lame brained judge says he/she thinks is could be is stupid, far reaching and not worth quoting. But , of course, you don’t have a problem with that. Oh, and Newsweek? give me a break. Troll and spout your venom elsewhere.
MNDavenotPC on September 13, 2008 at 2:42 PM
This has to be a Freudian accusation. Has to be.
econavenger on September 13, 2008 at 2:42 PM
Randi Rhodes to her teenage son,
“No, you can’t go to the Palin’s. You might be exposed conservative politics! You might be exposed to lawn care advice! You might be exposed to a normal family and realize what a freak your commie mother really is!”
Disturb the Universe on September 13, 2008 at 2:47 PM
Fugly Duckling, Fugly Thinking.
Western_Civ on September 13, 2008 at 2:47 PM
Or alphie was trying–and failing–to add to the Rhodes smear.
baldilocks on September 13, 2008 at 2:48 PM
You don’t really believe all the phony accusations Palin/Rove have made against her brother-in-law the cop to make her terrible behavior in this matter tolerable, do you MN?
Nice to see the right happy to piss all over yet another man in uniform whenever it suits their radical political agenda…
Support the troops!…hahahahahzaahhahahahaha.
You phonies.
alphie on September 13, 2008 at 2:48 PM
Stupid question time: Who was actually listening to this radio show to hear this rant?
darkpixel on September 13, 2008 at 2:40 PM
I heard her one time go off on White American Heterosexual Males for 20 minutes like I’ve never heard before.
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 2:50 PM
redrock on September 13, 2008 at 2:52 PM
I wonder what Alaskans think of all this leftie insanity.
ErinF on September 13, 2008 at 2:53 PM
Rhandi is like a slap in the fact to an hysteric — if it makes them worse, no loss, but it just may wake them up to the fact that the Dem party is just nuckin’ futs! They have no morals, ethics, code of conduct. No class, no meaning, can’t hold up to any smell test. Any scrutiny at all exposes them as frauds.
The allure of the left is based solely on feelings…and most of those feelings are of hatred. Hard to win the presidency based on that.
But if you actually looked beneath the surface, the truth of the Dem party is socialism.
stonemeister on September 13, 2008 at 2:54 PM
Actually, I’ll do you one better. All of the judges in every court proceeding involving the custody of children warn both sets of parents to keep their children out of the middle of their adult arguments. ALL.
Even two Obama supporters getting divorced arguing over their children’s custody would get the same lecture. That is without their being any real rancor or such interesting idiocy as tasering a 10 year old.
In other words, standard language across the board, but particularly when the custody battle is heated.
shall I get a judge on here to tell you that?
Frankly, and finally, you have no idea that the judge was aiming at Sarah Palin when he said that, mr. cut and paste. he could have been referring to Mr. Wooten’s family for that matter. I understand there is no love lost.
You are pretty pathetic, really.
Kat_Mo on September 13, 2008 at 2:54 PM
Randi Rhodes is jealous because there might be teenaged sons who would actually find Sarah Palin attractive vs. Randi Rhodes who would most commonly be referred to as a MIWNFEIWWTLPECDI, (mother I would never f— even if we were the last people on earth and civilization depended on it.)
foxforce91 on September 13, 2008 at 2:54 PM
That’s a pretty big leap from disparaging a child = child abuse to disparaging another relative in front of a child = child abuse.
Disturb the Universe on September 13, 2008 at 2:55 PM
McCain LOST a point? Any word on state polls? I understand a lot of these were in want of updating.
ManlyRash on September 13, 2008 at 2:57 PM
Lipstick and fishwrap…
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 2:57 PM
Oh, and Randi? Dyna Girl called. She wants her hairdo back.
foxforce91 on September 13, 2008 at 2:57 PM
The Dali Bama says I need to learn to speak english??
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 2:58 PM
Haha,
Where y’all from, kat?
Let me guess…The South?
Folks around my parts already know not to behave like freaks.
Palin being told by a judges not to abuse children ain’t that common outside of hillbilly territory…
alphie on September 13, 2008 at 2:59 PM
That was too funny! Thanks for the laugh in an otherwise depressing (due to subject matter) post…
CCRWM on September 13, 2008 at 3:00 PM
alphie, so the judge (quoted below), should have told the authorities that child abuse was occurring and that the perpetrators be apprehended. He did not do so, and therefore, he was either a) in the tank for the ex husband; or b) blowing smoke out of his black-robed ass.
If it’s child abuse, then action should have been taken, not this foolish whining BS.
A judge may have said it, but is sounds like he was simply BS-ing.
Sorry, alphie, wrong again.
john1schn on September 13, 2008 at 3:01 PM
Oh and alphie….. as a proud wearer of the uniform of theUSMC, I have every right to talk down a psuedo cop that was an embarrassment to his uniform. read the full court transcripts, they are public knowledge you know….. but, of course, you won’t do that…. you disgust me. Now I need to cool down, thanks alot, tool.
MNDavenotPC on September 13, 2008 at 3:01 PM
Palin being told by a judges not to abuse children ain’t that common outside of hillbilly territory…
alphie on September 13, 2008 at 2:59 PM
Certainly not at the L.A. Archdiocese…
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 3:01 PM
Are you 10? Seriously, you think the world in northern lib land only has well healed people who cooly decide on their children’s fate over a cup of Earl Grey?
You’re done. I don’t argue with children.
Kat_Mo on September 13, 2008 at 3:02 PM
Kat_Mo
I’m not a judge, but my dad is .. and I’m an attorney .. and you’re absolutely dead-on correct.
Personally, though, I hope these idiots and their 30 death squad members up there in Alaska keep it up. Making a lot of my moderate friends take a closer look at Obama .. they’re beginning to hold their noses.
cgoode777 on September 13, 2008 at 3:02 PM
Sorry dear, but when one of the members of those who are sworn to protect and serve goes bad, those of us who are committed to the truth want them punished. To not do so would tarnish the reputation of all uniformed personnel and make all of our motives suspect.
But you know that, of course; deep down. However, like the rest of your political kindred, you choose to dispense with the truth if it suits your political ends. The problem with habitual ignoring and/or denying the truth, however, it that it compromises one’s sanity.
Exhibit A.
You seem a little Borderline. There are medications for this, but the best remedy is prayer. I’ll help you out.
baldilocks on September 13, 2008 at 3:03 PM
I’m not putting too much stock in the polls…I think their primary purpose right now is to try to shape perception…someone said wait ’till closer to the election where they might be more accurate.
CCRWM on September 13, 2008 at 3:03 PM
Where Rhodes’ brain should be, there is the equivalent of dog turds and cat barf.
alteredbeat on September 13, 2008 at 3:06 PM
How is this woman still on the air? She is one of those people I love to hate.
amynorw on September 13, 2008 at 3:06 PM
Not likely. The only reason she has a job in the first place is because this is what her employers want out of her. They’re trying to supply what their customers are demanding and the customers they are deliberately targeting are the hate-drenched, psychotic lefties who read Daily Kos and watch Bill Maher. Give the people what they want.
Django on September 13, 2008 at 3:07 PM
Adolph Hitler was a Community Organizer….
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 3:07 PM
Alphie’s only purpose is to come on and try to hijack the thread and rile people up… I just ignore the stupidity and incendiary comments…
CCRWM on September 13, 2008 at 3:07 PM
Palin was not disparaging the child. She was disparaging the father, if anything. If that is what the Judge was alluding to.
Usually, what they are really talking about is that parents have a bad tendency to talk very badly about the other parent when in the middle of a hot divorce. Sometimes, they don’t even realize that the littlest comments about how the dad is never around or the mom worked too much, etc to a child can be detrimental to their esteem and mental health. Kids sometimes take that on themselves and it is already a hard time when parents are getting divorced. never mind if it is a really hard fought battle over custody and child support.
that is why, yes, that is common language of a judge to admonish the parents in the middle of a divorce or custody battle not to “disparage” one another in front of the children.
Kat_Mo on September 13, 2008 at 3:08 PM
I’m telling you, RR if she has not acted on urges of child molestation has certainly thought about.
You don’t talk about an issue like that the way she does.
This is an angry bitter woman, and it would not surprise me at all if she has tried to seduce or tempt a boy (or maybe a girl).
Sick people.
Get it out there and watch as Obama has to go back on defense to try to distance himself from this witch.
Sapwolf on September 13, 2008 at 3:08 PM
Rhodes must get this stuff from Michelle Obama’s sunday school class for kids….
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 3:08 PM
There should be no pressure placed on her employers directly. The companies that advertise on her station and her show affiliates are another matter entirely.
john1schn on September 13, 2008 at 3:09 PM
…which leads me to wonder: Why haven’t they hired her for “The View”?
She seems to be a woman (actually, she seems to be a weasel who’s been strategically shaved), which qualifies her per “View” standards to opine like a guru on all and sundry. She can take Whoopi’s job…or maybe even Behar’s job, once they’ve deloused her seat. Whoopi’s bright at least…Behar’d be useless cut up for bait!
Maybe she could get a job on PBS or bridge over to NPR, if she can modify her voice and assume one of those dripping, holier-than-thou public broadcasting whispers.
If McCain’s people could do an ad intro’d with “Here are what Obama supporters think of Gov. Palin”, and then string together a host of sound bites of Rhodes, Damon, Pam Anderson, etc. ad nauseum over pics of Sarah and the kids, Sarah on the fishing boat, Sarah in the governor’s office, etc…taking care to insert a many of them as they can find using the word “afraid” in them (Damon, etc.)…ending with “What are they afraid of?” Then, flash up “Palin degragement syndrome: the irrational fear of someone genuine.”
…it’d beat that one they did with the “pig in lipstick” (which had Katie Couric in it, ironically enough)….
Puritan1648 on September 13, 2008 at 3:10 PM
Alphie’s only purpose is to come on and try to hijack the thread and rile people up… I just ignore the stupidity and incendiary comments…
CCRWM on September 13, 2008 at 3:07 PM
Hey, Alphie is THE NEW MAINSTREAM! Just ask! ha ha ha
DfDeportation on September 13, 2008 at 3:10 PM
I know. I guess I did not make my point clear.
I was criticizing alphie for portraying her disparaging the father as “child abuse”.
Disturb the Universe on September 13, 2008 at 3:11 PM
Baldi,
You remind me of Murtha accusing the Haditha Marines without knowing the facts…
What do you really know about Palin’s brother-in-law the cop outside of what Palin and her lawyers have told you?
His boss seems to think he’s a stand up guy and the Palin sisters are just bitter, shrieking harpies…
Hmmm.
Why is the right soooo ready to trash him on command?
alphie on September 13, 2008 at 3:12 PM
Kat_Mo
I’m not a judge, but my dad is .. and I’m an attorney ..
Mmmm…I think some people will be appreciative of the ticket, but still vote Obama. He has been engraved in their minds for almost a year.
However, I do work in an office full of women. I would say that the attacks on Palin were so egregious that it did make the most Democrat ladies in the office wonder exactly what that was about. And, yes, I workd in a field where there are a lot of Democrat ladies.
Kat_Mo on September 13, 2008 at 3:14 PM
Or, my mind was on something else. Seems clear when I read it again. My apologies.
Kat_Mo on September 13, 2008 at 3:16 PM
Thank you. I try to see the humor in this stuff. The attacks have gotten to be absurd. How can anyone take them seriously? How can anyone take Randi Rhodes seriously? With that hair?!!
foxforce91 on September 13, 2008 at 3:17 PM
His boss would not likely be privy to what is going on in the home.
What do you really know?
You sound a little bitter yourself, alph. Have some “shrieking harpies” in your own life, have you?
Disturb the Universe on September 13, 2008 at 3:19 PM
…laughing on the outside…sometimes
Moxie on September 13, 2008 at 3:24 PM
My dear, I’ve witnessed your demonstrable inability to wield logic long before you began posting here so I’m not bothered by what I remind you of.
baldilocks on September 13, 2008 at 3:24 PM
O/T but worth reading in the wake of the effect Ike will have on gas prices.
ManlyRash on September 13, 2008 at 3:26 PM
Nice, Disturb
Maybe y’all ought to hold off pissing all over this man in uniform until all the evidence comes out, eh?
I think that, just like Haditha, you Murthas of the Right will have a lot of explaining to do…
alphie on September 13, 2008 at 3:27 PM
And FDR was once a…..governor. Hmmmmm.
ManlyRash on September 13, 2008 at 3:28 PM
alphie on September 13, 2008 at 3:27 PM
Thing is, Alphie, the Murtha of the left and his ilk have yet to explain their defamation of the Haditha Marines, so can your self-righteous indignation.
Disturb the Universe on September 13, 2008 at 3:32 PM
LOL,..snake woman strikes.ppfftt.
christene on September 13, 2008 at 3:33 PM
I’m only laughing on the outside;
My smile is just skin deep.
If you could see inside
I’m really crying –
You might join me for a weep.
ManlyRash on September 13, 2008 at 3:33 PM
i thought the lead guitarist for ozzy was dead
custer on September 13, 2008 at 3:34 PM
I just loved this when I saw it!
“‘Who am I?’
I’m under 45 years old, I love the outdoors, I hunt, I am a Republican reformer, I have taken on the Republican Party establishment, I have many children, I have a spot on the national ticket as vice president with less than two years in the governor’s office. Who am I?”
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Teddy Roosevelt in 1900. (You probably thought it was Governor Sarah Palin!)
2Nightmares on September 13, 2008 at 3:38 PM
No Offense Ed, but is it really wise to bring attention to the ranting of one clearly insane woman with a total national listenership smaller than the population of Wasilla?
Rhodes is nothing more than an angry attention whore. She says outrageous things because that is how she sustains her living. Better to ignore her, and maybe she’ll seek psychiatric help.
BKennedy on September 13, 2008 at 3:42 PM
Is it just me or when she’s wearing glasses does Raunchy Rhodes look like Al Franken?
TooTall on September 13, 2008 at 3:42 PM
She has the name of one of Ozzie’s ex-guitarists.. but she looks like present day Ozzie !! How ironic
… Alanis.
redrock on September 13, 2008 at 3:45 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »