I do wonder how Sean can keep a straight face when he has to converse with Mike Huckabeen, the slithering snake.

Hannity will be accused of making fun of the Apollo theater.

SouthernGent on September 13, 2008 at 12:17 PM

Yeah… either that or, it will force Carl Weathers out of quasi-retirement to endorse Barack Obama.

Juxtapose Obama ignoring the plight of his half brother living in destitution in Kenya with the charitable heart of McCain who welcomed into his family a baby from Mother Theresa’s orphanage.

Disturb the Universe on September 13, 2008 at 11:32 AM

Perhaps the McCains ought to offer to adopt him!

I am disappointed that there is no video available.

In 2004, the Obamas reported $207,647 in adjusted gross income, of which they contributed $2500 to charity (a little more than 1% of their AGI). In 2004, the Bidens reported $234,271 in adjusted gross income, on which they reported charitable contributions of a whopping $380. I guess Barry’s little bro better hope Sean Hannity sends him the check, because it doesn’t look like Barry or Joe are big believers in sharing the wealth (at least, not when it’s their own wealth).

It also doesn’t look like Barry or Joe know much about saving and/or investing money. Obama’s 2004 tax returns report no interest or dividend income whatsoever. Biden’s 2004 tax returns reported the grand sum of $129 in interest income, and zero dividend income. Both the Obamas and the Bidens were earning over $200,000 per year for several years prior to 2004. (The Obamas had adjusted gross income of over $240,000 and the Bidens had adjusted gross income of over $220,000 for each year in 2001, 2002 and 2003). Barry and Joe want to run our economy — apparently they just don’t want to invest in it themselves.

AZCoyote on September 13, 2008 at 4:12 PM

Good post AZ! The bit I bolded cracked me up xD.

How dare anyone call out the chosen “One.” Before Obama makes a move, Charlie Gibson should ask him how he feels about it.

whitetop on September 13, 2008 at 11:51 AM

Hey! You’re forgetting Michelle’s kids. Will it help them?

My point is LEAVE THE FRIGGIN FAMILIES OUT OF THIS CRAP. All families look weird from the outside…even yours.

I’m going to vote for McCain/Palin despite any issues I might have with their imperfect families.

he certainly made his point and got the conference energized to action.

What kind of action?
Campaign work?

Hannity, however, reaches a broad spectrum of viewers/listeners who don’t use Internet sources as much. He certainly meets the needs of audiences that would otherwise be inundated with the MSMs message and never hear a conservative point of view.

Without his repetition re Wright and its invective-filled message, many Americans would not be aware of the complete Obama biography. In fact, I believe that eventually ABC could no longer ignore the rants of Wright because broadcasters like Hannity brought the issue to the public’s attention.

I’d like Hannity to build on what is coming to light about Obama’s connections with Ayers regarding the huge amounts of money for educational purposes via the Annenberg Foundation. The generous grant eventually underwrote Marxist education-ideals programs, filtered to dubious projects, showed no educational gains, and went down the tubes into the black hole of memory. Efforts to research the issue have been stymied. It needs to be scrutinized.

Obama’s relation the Franklin Marshall Davis, CPUSA mentor to the young Obama must be presented to the public, as should the influence of Saul Alinsky’s teachings to a major presidential candidate.

When people say Hannity is hateful, I wonder what program they have ever heard. He is affable to all of his callers and guests. He presents a conservative viewpoint and offers his reasons why. If callers disagree with his point of view and offer reasons for that disagreement, he listens courteously and probes them to support their ideas. More often than not, his detractors offer no substantiation, only obvious talking points. If he doesn’t let his show(s) become platforms for bots, that is hardly hateful or polarizing behavior.

Charles Gibson and his ilk in the media and the Beltway need to be reminded of what makes America unique. It is not the self-annointed elite but the savvy people themselves who have a clear vision of their principles, who align them with principles of our Constitution, and who demonstrate executive skill.

I’ll watch him from time to time but get turned off by his ego and tabloidism. (Is that a word?)

Gee, I feel like Sigmund! Where is he when you need him?

Spirit of 1776 on September 13, 2008 at 11:28 AM

I agree for the most part. I don’t care to listen to either of them to be honest. If both would leave the ad hominem attacks aside, state their positions and actually argue, they, and “conservatives”, would be better off. Calling people “stupid” doesn’t do anything to advance one’s own argument. They’d be wise to learn this point.

Put Rush on TV.

That said, I don’t mind him being a cheerleader, I just wish he would change it up a bit more.

Chris Matthews was really down the middle in 1999 and 2000. He would call his liberal guests on his show on their BS and make them flesh out their views. I even bought his 1st book because I was so impressed with him. I don’t know what the heck happened but he sold out big time. Yeah, I know he worked for Tip O’Niel and for Carter but he really converted to the dark side. He’s just a weasely, butthead now!

Hannity offered to send Obama’s destitute half-brother in Kenya
Shouldn’t he just pull himself up by his own bootstraps or something? Maybe start a business, invest in some hedge funds.

crr6 on September 13, 2008 at 1:06 PM

Your facetious comment reminds me of something I read this morning about the Obamas’ (and the Bidens’) history of charitable giving, and their investments (before Barry was running for President and knew he’d have to release his tax returns).
In 2004, the Obamas reported $207,647 in adjusted gross income, of which they contributed $2500 to charity (a little more than 1% of their AGI). In 2004, the Bidens reported $234,271 in adjusted gross income, on which they reported charitable contributions of a whopping $380. I guess Barry’s little bro better hope Sean Hannity sends him the check, because it doesn’t look like Barry or Joe are big believers in sharing the wealth (at least, not when it’s their own wealth).

It also doesn’t look like Barry or Joe know much about saving and/or investing money. Obama’s 2004 tax returns report no interest or dividend income whatsoever. Biden’s 2004 tax returns reported the grand sum of $129 in interest income, and zero dividend income. Both the Obamas and the Bidens were earning over $200,000 per year for several years prior to 2004. (The Obamas had adjusted gross income of over $240,000 and the Bidens had adjusted gross income of over $220,000 for each year in 2001, 2002 and 2003). Barry and Joe want to run our economy — apparently they just don’t want to invest in it themselves.

Are they trying to elect a dunce?

Tough on them that they don’t get a “do-over” on their primary campaign, isn’t it?

{^_^}