FRC Action Summit: Bill Bennett

posted at 9:26 am on September 13, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

Bill Bennett brought his wit and charm to the FRC podium, starting off by digging at the media for its treatment of Sarah Palin as a rube.  Mocking their concern that Palin had never been to Europe, Bennett said that some CNN correspondents had probably never been to Texas.  “Frankly,” Bennett said, “Jefferson could have used a little less Paris.”

Bennett spoke about values, and the contrast between Barack Obama and Palin.  John McCain, he said, is a known quantity, the product of a life of service in defense of the nation and in the public sphere.  He quoted McCain’s line from the convention: “And so, I was no longer my own man; I was my country’s.”  Joe Biden is also a known quantity, a standard Democratic pol.  But Obama and Palin need more scrutiny.

Palin, Bennett says, is a woman of accomplishment.  She has raised a family while succeeding in a difficult career.  If the McCain campaign lets Palin be Palin, Bennett says, she’ll be fine.  She has already proven her mettle.  But what about foreign-policy experience, critics ask?  Bennett says the three most accomplished foreign-policy makers in the late 20th century were Ronald Reagan, Pope John Paul II, and Margaret Thatcher.  They came from humble origins and did remarkably well.

Bennett said that we have to tread carefully in our support of the Palins for the pregnancy of their teen daughter.  We need to applaud the way that they handled this family crisis, Bennett says, but we have to remain focused on preventing teen sex and fight an epidemic that creates these pregnancies.  We can do both, and we should.

Obama represents a different set of values, and Bennett warns that these could prove dangerous to the American way of life.  We shouldn’t question his patriotism, but we can certainly question his judgment.  Fred Thompson summed it up best, Bennett says.  “There are two questions we will never have to ask about John McCain: Who is this man, and can we trust him with the Presidency?”

He hit Obama on two specific points.  The first was his statement at the Barackopolis that he can make America the last, best hope for mankind once again.  Bennett asked, when did we stop being that hope, and who took our place?  The second was Obama’s assertion that we couldn’t criticize Russia well for its invasion of Georgia after we invaded Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and liberated Iraq from a brutal and dangerous dictatorship.

Obama seems engulfed in a blame-America-first mentality, which got an airing at the Saddleback Forum in his answer on the necessity of confronting evil.  Obama claimed that we perpetrated evil while operating on a pretense of fighting it.  When, Bennett asks?  When we liberated Dachau?  When we kept the world safe from an oppressive Communist totalitarianism?  Why is Obama focusing on our evil, instead of the real threats to our nation?

Bennett says he thought we’d gotten past the blame-America-first mentality, but Obama proves otherwise.  He can do that and run for President, but it expresses a value system that seems hostile to the America that most of us know.  “You, sir, are just too ambivalent about the United States to become its leader.”

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

“Jefferson could have used a little less Paris.”

…and Obama could have used a little less Germany (i.e., less Marx).

eea on September 13, 2008 at 9:41 AM

Bennett probably has to be diplomatic in speaking about Obama; I less so. According to a commentary in the Canada Free Press, Saul Alinsky’s son claims that “Obama has learned his father’s lessons well.” Obama’s pride in his community organizer history is a pride in using Communist techniques to spread an ideology.

To borrow from an idea in the thread on Obama’s use of personal attacks, one can conclude that the Dem presidential candidate is living in a glass house, easily shattered if the media would examine his history with more curiosity and less than hands-off adulation.

Obama is dangerous to our American liberties and way of life. He deserves a full vetting.

onlineanalyst on September 13, 2008 at 9:48 AM

Bennett is one of my favorite commentators, professional and mild mannered – his morning show on Sirius is one of the best.

dugan on September 13, 2008 at 9:52 AM

Bennet is a good guy with great oratory skills & an excellent conservative ideology, but…
all a liberal has to do to challenge Bennet on any point is to say,
“Wanna bet?”

eea on September 13, 2008 at 9:53 AM

I find the excitement over the Palin nomination refreshing and, at the same time, measure. Thus far, we have avoided over-the-top “lightworker”-brand goofy adulation, opting for a “Wow! What a nice surprise and a great idea” response.

It is not unforseeable that this ticket will mellow a bit and move happily and, yes, buoyantly to the election in November with a nice edge.

Frankly, this is a ticket that I’m completely comfortable with. It’s not platform-perfect, but, it’s the best game in town, and a darn sight better than the fatuous and transparent altenative!

heldmyw on September 13, 2008 at 9:54 AM

Except we have yet to hear from the Obama camp exactly what a community organizer IS or what specifically he DID as one. Or who he was associated with – presumably he worked with groups that are in existence. Under what umbrella did he work?

All we have heard from the left on community organizing is that it is code for “black” in the hopes of getting people to stop asking questions about it.

Queen0fCups on September 13, 2008 at 9:56 AM

The double-standard Gibson applied to Palin, compared with the uncritical media platforms repeatedly offered to Obama, who has had zero executive experience running anything, was especially striking. ABC and Gibson focused on Palin as if she were running right now for the presidency rather than the vice presidency. He and other media pundits, by contrast, have never asked the Democratic vice presidential nominee, Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, if he has ever had to make a decision on anything.

Gibson’s aggressive approach appeared to take Palin by surprise: He was clearly attempting to put her on point by presenting her as having extreme religious views. This again, however, appears to be a double-standard, as Palin grew up in the Assemblies of God, one of the largest Christian denominations in America with 16 million members, and is now a member of the Wasilla Bible Church. Even now, Obama has yet to receive any comparable grilling on his 20-year attendance in the congregation of the notoriously racist Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

http://www.upi.com/news/issueoftheday/2008/09/12/ABCs_Gibson_grilled_Palin_hard_but_it_may_backfire/UPI-81241221234472/

UPI gives a very pro Palin assessment. Read the whole thing.

Mr. Joe on September 13, 2008 at 10:08 AM

…and Obama could have used a little less Germany (i.e., less Marx).

eea on September 13, 2008 at 9:41 AM

True and clever.

EnglishMike on September 13, 2008 at 11:27 AM

Mocking their concern that Palin had never been to Europe, Bennett said that some CNN correspondents had probably never been to Texas.

Ha! Nice. I was gonna say Alaska.

I’ve been to Europe, I lived there for three years. I had a great time, but it only made me love America even more than I already did. I have lib friends who’ve been to France for a week and think they know all about it. But vacationing ther and LIVING there are two different things entirely. The 35 hour work week, the high unemployment, the roving gangs of ‘dissaffected youths’ (aka muslims) burning everything in sight. Nice place to visit (just the touristy spots, don’t go near the suburbs) but you wouldn’t wanna live there.

Tony737 on September 13, 2008 at 11:39 AM

I’ve been to Paris several times. It would be my favorite city if it weren’t for the French (and the car-burning “youths”, of course.)

Disturb the Universe on September 13, 2008 at 11:40 AM

Obama represents a different set of values, and Bennett warns that these could prove dangerous to the American way of life. We shouldn’t question his patriotism, but we can certainly question his judgment.

Dammit, why can’t we question his patriotism? The only reason these Dems whine about their patriotism being questioned is because they know they don’t have any and they cannot be reelected if the rest of the country knows it. If they had any patriotism, maybe their judgment wouldn’t be so bad. We make judgments, not in light of our knowledge alone, but tempered by our ideals and beliefs. If you have no ideals outside of yourself and you believe in nothing but yourself, then hell yes, you’re going to make bad judgments because all your judgments are centered on you, without regard for anyone else.

SKYFOX on September 13, 2008 at 12:49 PM

Bennett asked, when did we stop being that hope, and who took our place?

That’s bugged me for a long time about libs; they assume we’ve all lost hope somehow and end up appealing to the most self-pitying.

See, for example, Dennis Kucinich’s “Hope Begins” campaign slogan. Hope begins? With Dennis?

saint kansas on September 13, 2008 at 7:48 PM

Bennett is good,he can cut to the quick,with a low-key demeanor, and a disarming smile.Wow did a tough marine really use these words?Guess you CAN take the nam out of the marine!Semper Fi my brothers and sisters

Marines for Mccain on September 15, 2008 at 6:58 AM