Video: Shep jumps on Democrat for “age dig” at McCain

The liberal talking head says,”who cares what she has to say”.

Well genius,she is a democratic leader in SC and represents
your party,what she says goes straight to her abilities of leadership(or lack there of).
Hard to believe these are the same people who get their panties all up in a wad and blame it on Republicans if Jerry
Falwell says something they don’t like.

The democratic genius wants to make a big deal about McCain’s age and time in Washington.If age and time in Washington is such a negative,what the he!! does it say about Obama’s judgment by picking 66 yr.old Biden who has spent almost 40 years in the Senate:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/08/the_case_against_joe_biden.html

The central tenet of Obama’s campaign message is that if Americans want to change their government, then they have to change the people they send to Washington.
Picking Biden, who has served in the Senate for the better part of the last four decades, seems to run counter to that core message. Biden was elected to the Senate at age 29 and spent only four years after graduating from Syracuse Law School in 1968 working in the private sector before entering public life.

OOOHHHH MMMMYYY God!!Mr. no change is only a heartbeat away from the Presidency.

But have no fear,because a younger man is at the head of the democratic ticket and is ready to heal the world because
he was a community organizer that accomplished absolutely nothing:

What Did Obama Do As A Community Organizer?
And is it really a qualification to be president?
http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=OWMxNGUxZWJjYzg1NjA0MTlmZDZmMjUwZGU3ZjAwNmU=

Has any of that brought about the change Obama spoke of back in 1985? Not in any large sense. But if Obama doesn’t have much to show for his years as an organizer, it’s fair to say that many of the people he touched revere him deeply. Remember what Loretta Augustine-Herron said: Obama had such a powerful presence that he made her believe he could do the job, even though there was little in his résumé to suggest he could. Does that sound familiar to anyone who has watched the Obama campaign? When hope is the product, Obama can sell it with the best of them.

Just how far up your own a$$ does your head have to be for
a democrat to actually make sense?

Baxter Greene on September 10, 2008 at 11:07 PM

I am late to this thread, so sorry if it has been asked/answered:

Palin didn’t take per diem money when in her own house, she simply marked that she was in her own house and took no money. Surely this guy know this, as does Shep. Why did he get away with that remark?

Hunt035 on September 11, 2008 at 12:12 AM

I didn’t take on the last part of your question in my original post,but this is my best shot at it.

1. Shep saw that he was making a fool of himself enough without having to call him on it.When you watch the video,the liberal talking head makes several bogus statements one after the other,to call him on everyone would
have made the segment incoherent.

2.”surely this guy knows this”

Of course this guy knows what he is saying is bullsh!t,but liberals don’t care about the truth,it’s about staying on message and throwing enough against the wall to see what sticks.Every democrat talking head on the other networks is repeating the same talking points,over and over and over and
over,knowing that eventually it will stick with enough people that only watch a 5 minute news cycle and the help of
the MSM that will rarely refute the smear.

liberals used this tactic with the help of the MSM in branding Bush with the “Bush lied” label concerning the Iraq
war.

1.democrats spent most of the 90′s and up until most of them
voted for the Iraq war telling America that Saddam was a threat due to his WMD/Nuclear programs,ties to al-qaeda,massive genocide,and starting several wars.
……
2.Our own intelligence agencies,France,Germany,Britain,and the UN backed up most of our intelligence on Iraq with the final assessment being one of “high confidence”from the CIA concerning Saddam’s weapons programs and ties to al-qaeda.
…….
3.Every major investigation into the Bush Administration concerning pre-war intel has found that Bush did not lie.
(9/11 commission,Butler Report,2003 Senate intelligence report,2007 Senate intelligence report(a democratic partisan joke):

‘Bush Lied’? If Only It Were That Simple.
By Fred Hiatt
Monday, June 9, 2008; Page A17
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/08/AR2008060801687.html

Search the Internet for “Bush Lied” products, and you will find sites that offer more than a thousand designs. The basic “Bush Lied, People Died” bumper sticker is only the beginning.

WaPo: Bush “substantiated by intelligence” – UPDATED
http://theanchoressonline.com/2008/06/09/wapo-bush-substantiated-by-intelligence/

What a long, strange trip it’s been, and here, some years later, we finally get someone in the press to tell it straight: Bush did not lie.

4.Democrats have had control of Congress since 2006,have full control of the house.If Bush had lied,they could have
impeached in a heartbeat.He didn’t lie,thus no impeachment.
………
But none of this stops liberals from continuing to repeat this bogus drivel and with the help of the MSM,hollywood,and
democrats on the hill,a lot of people still believe that Bush lied to get America into the Iraq war.

Liberal lies concerning NSA wiretapping,Katrina,Haliburton,and Bush’s ties to “Big Oil”are basically repeated over and over and over until they
stick.
This is why duke of dumbsh!t was rattling off democratic talking points without the least bit of concern for the truth.
Liberals don’t want the truth,they just want their ideologies and opinions confirmed,no matter how much lying or cut and paste propaganda it takes.

Baxter Greene on September 11, 2008 at 2:08 AM