McCain ad: “Lipstick”; Flashback: Obama flips the bird at Hillary; Update: Sexist Memory Lane
posted at 8:00 am on September 10, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | regular view
It didn’t take Team McCain long to develop a new television spot from Barack Obama’s “lipstick on a pig” comment. They have rolled out this 30-second spot hammering Obama for his sexism, using a Katie Couric quote to remind viewers of Obama’s allegedly sexist campaign against Hillary Clinton. They also note that while Obama isn’t ready to lead, he seems ready to smear:
What’s interesting about this is the timing. Obama had just torpedoed himself with his Crackerquiddick comments in San Francisco about small-town Americans (like Palin!) bitterly clinging to guns and God. Hillary had just cleaned Obama’s clock in a Philadelphia debate two days earlier. He responded to the pressure with a crude gesture — not exactly the kind of intelligent response one would expect from the former editor of the Harvard Law Review.
Update II: A few more data points for those wondering about Obama’s insensitivity on sexist imagery:
- “She’s got the kitchen sink flying, and the china flying, and the, you know, the buffet is coming at me.” — April 20
- “You challenge the status quo and suddenly the claws come out.” — February, Tulane University
- “I understand that Senator Clinton, periodically when she’s feeling down, launches attacks as a way of trying to boost her appeal.” — February
Again, this is Obama’s turf. He started this line of thinking by accusing John McCain and Republicans on four separate occasions this summer of conducting racist attacks by coded subtext. If he wants to play that game, the McCain campaign just let him know that they can play it better.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
The image linked too above from Free: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinion/ssi/images/Toles/c_09052008_520.gif
Vizzini on September 10, 2008 at 9:16 AM
Mock Barry on it, say “is this the best you got?” and move on to our next manuever….
It is obvious what he does to anyone who cares and seems tedious to those who don’t.
The most powerful woman in America this morning is Hillary Clinton one press conference and she can destroy Barry….
if I were John I’d ask her what she wanted.
sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 9:17 AM
Widely known story? What’s widely know about an alliterative riff? Did you read the link or are you assuming you know what it says?
The cartoon appears on the 5th, he makes this speech on the 9th. 4 days later, he uses the exact same words. You call it “allusion” average people call it “plagiarism.”
TheBigOldDog on September 10, 2008 at 9:17 AM
Agreed. McCain shouldn’t bring it up at all, just let it spread across the country on its own.
BadgerHawk on September 10, 2008 at 9:18 AM
I think that Reps are overplaying this one. A better strategy would have been for Palin to make a simple public comment along the lines of:
Recently Senator Obama made a comment about lipstick that many think was intended as an insult to me. I have too much respect for the Senator to believe that he would deliberately choose this course and do not think that any apology is needed. I suspect that he simply did not think about how the words would be understood by others.
Sometimes rhetoric gets in the way. He has had this problem before. (Fill in an example). I hope he learns from these incidents. It does not serve our country for someone running for our highest office, yet alone the one holding it, to make public statements that could be seen as insulting or demeaning when that was not the intent.
Play up the stupidity of the statement and the implications rather than the content. He can argue that people are reading more into it than was meant but he can’t argue that they aren’t reading it. It also lampoons his rhetorical delivery.
OBQuiet on September 10, 2008 at 9:18 AM
ah…ummmm…that was “inartfull nuance” I take it.
wait for another “clarification” of what he really meant to say.
rebecca on September 10, 2008 at 9:19 AM
exactly…have her “uh uhm uh *insert joke* hahaha
then say…I don’t recall Reagan or JFK speaking that way.
sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 9:20 AM
Identity politics is nasty stuff. The best way to beat it is to turn it inward against itself. That’s one of the keys to success of Team McCain.
Here’s hoping it’s a lesson not lost on future GOP candidates.
petefrt on September 10, 2008 at 9:21 AM
Ed Morrissey on September 10, 2008 at 9:14 AM
But Ed, he never claimed Republicans have waged racist attacks on him this summer. He accurately said that some have used his name and false claims about his religion to stoke fears about him.
If you want to call those attacks racist, your more than welcome to. But, the bottom line, his claims were correct.
But, the irony is kind of funny. You consistently accuse Obama of playing the race card… then the second anything could maybe be taken as sexist, you contortions Cique De Ole would be proud off to accuse Obama of being a sexist.
Tom_Shipley on September 10, 2008 at 9:22 AM
It is UTTERLY IRRELEVANT if Obama “meant to” refer to Palin or not.
We’re talking POLITICS here…if it “sticks,” USE IT (of course, within reason, not to the point of backfiring..).
I am ALL FOR “pushing” the issues of
* Ayers/Woods Foundation/Annenberg
* Wright/Pfleger
* Rezko
among others, as far as reasonably possible.
YET, I see NO REASON this should EXCLUDE also going on the offensive with this matter, even if on the basis of “emotion” alone (I personally consider it a matter of greater concern, but you may disagree).
If it “sticks,” go with it.
Lockstein13 on September 10, 2008 at 9:22 AM
Tom Shipley –
Are you kidding me? Was it honorable to distort McCain’s 100 years in Iraq comment? This is the game. Don’t be a whiny little brat about it.
JAM on September 10, 2008 at 9:22 AM
The pig comment was clever, because as a standard idiom it provides plausible deniablity for Obama himself, and at the same time he knows perfectly well his audience will hear it as the red meat insult it was. The crowd obviously took it as a raw dig at Palin, and Obama didn’t correct them at all. He knew what he was doing. He knew who the “stinky fish” was too.
RBMN on September 10, 2008 at 9:23 AM
I think it was a careful and strategic distraction. Did anyone else watch the O’Reilly interview with Obama last night and come away thinking it was damaging to Obama? I did. I think Obama felt that segment would be damaging as well. Without the ‘pig/lipstick’ story, his stammering responses about his relationship with Ayers would have been a bigger story.
Oh, and also the NY Post broke the story about Rev. Wright’s alleged affair with a church secretary in Dallas.
carbon_footprint on September 10, 2008 at 9:24 AM
If it “sticks,” go with it.
You’ve just summed up the McCain strategy perfectly.
Tom_Shipley on September 10, 2008 at 9:25 AM
says the person fanboying the media circus on Palin….
*whiffle*
sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 9:26 AM
However this plays out, here’s the thing:
This guy is a a lousy candidate.
As someone–me–said back in the spring: by the fall, Obamamania will seem as dated as the macarena.
Well it’s fall and it is.
This guy’s not in his element in arenas and stadiums in front of the fainting faithful anymore. He’s not reading teleprompted texts offering up emptiness desguised as oratory to uplifted faces.
He can’t even wear his exquisitely tailored suits any longer.
No. Now he’s just a little man on little stages and for all the world he looks like nothing more than a struggling standup act.
And as the same prescient poster predicted back in the spring, now that this time has arrived, there’s nowhere for him to go. There’s nothing he can fall back on. There’s no record of achievement to which he can point to ask us to take another look and give him another chance.
Bye-bye, Barry.
Typhoon on September 10, 2008 at 9:27 AM
I dunno. It sounds to me like Palin is the lipstick, and the Republican Party generally is the pig. Opinions seem to be evenly split as to whether it is 100% obvious that the stinky fish was a reference to McCain’s age, and whether it is 100% obvious that it is a vulgar reference to a certain part of the female anatomy. I don’t think it’s either, but hey, if people get P.O.’ed at Obama for all the wrong reasons, I’ll take it. Better the right result for the wrong reasons than vice-versa.
Xrlq on September 10, 2008 at 9:27 AM
I did. My thoughts were posted here.
backwoods conservative on September 10, 2008 at 9:28 AM
Obama said the Republicans are going to use his skin color against him. Clear as day.
Paul-Cincy on September 10, 2008 at 9:29 AM
How bout just letting Todd, the snow machine racer, put a big ol can of whoop ass on the punk. 0′b0mba!
dhunter on September 10, 2008 at 9:29 AM
If there are any rational voters who would like a nuclear war as a result of Obama’s “diplomacy”, they are oxymorons.
Right_of_Attila on September 10, 2008 at 9:29 AM
Oh please… save your faux outrage (even though you say you aren’t).
I happen to agree that it’s very possible that Obama didn’t mean it the way it came out, but BOY OH BOY… his supporters sure did think that was what he was implying.
Watch the clip… the people in the audience “get it”.
The ads McCain have been running have been FACTUAL, TRUTHFUL, and SPOT ON. And effective too, based on how your fellow compatriots are foaming at the mouth with “righteous indignation”.
Just like McDonald’s… I’m Loving It!
Nineball on September 10, 2008 at 9:30 AM
Indeed, that is why we need to hope Annenburg breaks soon. Ayers and Barry KNOW they will soon be tied together as more than just “ships passing in the night” with documentary proof….when that happens Barry will die the death of a thousand 527s.
sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 9:32 AM
Wow.. that was a BAD post on my part. That was supposed to quote Tom Shipley.
Feel free to delete that one…
*Slinks away* Serves me right for trying to work and surf at the same time.. :-(
Nineball on September 10, 2008 at 9:33 AM
I agree that McCain-Palin should pivot to highlight both Obama’s stupidity, but I’d also highlight his childishness. I still do feel that Obama was flipping Hillary the bird back in the primaries. Though trying to be “cool” in doing so, he struck me as extraordinarily childish. Whatever the case, all should agree that Obama brought this on himself because in extemporaneous speaking situations he is simply a moron.
I do quibble with part of the second suggested paragraph:
I’m too lazy to rewrite the emphasized part, but I’ll just say that I wouldn’t let Obama off the hook regarding his intent. No one knows his actual intent, but he doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt given that everyone knows how it was taken–especially Obama’s cheering crowd. It’s his problem that he’s not more careful with what he says.
BuckeyeSam on September 10, 2008 at 9:34 AM
On a side note… if anyone in here wanted to know anything about the Apply Customer Entries window… well, there ya go!
It’s a freebie from me to you! :D *slinks away again*
Nineball on September 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM
+1… WOW! Now THAT would make an excellent commercial, especially if delivered by Sarah!
Team Maverick… are you listening?
dominigan on September 10, 2008 at 9:36 AM
Yup, you called it right. Personally, I wouldn’t have done the ad myself either, especially given that the two are going to be together at Ground Zero on September 11th.
That said, words mean things, and language can have unintended consequences if one isn’t careful. Do we really want as president a guy who doesn’t know how to chose his words well?
This bumpy ride to November is getting bumpier by the day…
itzWicks on September 10, 2008 at 9:36 AM
Michelle should write a coverstory for National Review titles “Why Does Obama hate Women?”
We have to frame the debate on our own terms.
promachus on September 10, 2008 at 9:36 AM
Correction!
The real irony:
Obama plays the race card with his fictional accounts of racist statements he claims are being made by McCain and the GOP. Then turns around and says that the McCain camp is playing the gender card against an actual, televised statement from Obama himself.
geckomon on September 10, 2008 at 9:38 AM
carbon-footprint
I watched it. He didn’t come off well at all. Tried to hit the “I was 8 yrs. old when he did those things.” BS line again. I thought O’Reilly did an excellent job. I really liked his response to Obama’s obsfucating “I know a thousand people.” O’Reilly, “I don’t know anyone like that.”
Gold!
JAM on September 10, 2008 at 9:39 AM
This is just as if McCain had said about Obama’s positions “let’s call a spade a spade”. Old, shop-worn phrase, similar in meaning to the “lipstick on a pig” saying, but insensitive when talking about someone who’s black, as “spade” can be seen as a racial slight, so rightly or wrongly he’d be nailed for it.
Paul-Cincy on September 10, 2008 at 9:40 AM
LOL
Don’t feel bad. That copy/paste has reared it’s ugly head here with me before.
carbon_footprint on September 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM
I agree. I’d maybe change that last line to something like…
dominigan on September 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM
Did you notice how Barry always tried to touch Bill on his left knee every time he felt the heat? Kind of like a female would do.
carbon_footprint on September 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM
McCain adviser Carly Fiorina said she was:
… appalled by the Obama campaign’s attempts to belittle Governor Sarah Palin’s experience. The facts are that Sarah Palin has made more executive decisions as a Mayor and Governor than Barack Obama has made in his life. Because of Hillary Clinton’s historic run for the Presidency and the treatment she received, American women are more highly tuned than ever to recognize and decry sexism in all its forms. They will not tolerate sexist treatment of Governor Palin.
I don’t recall Obama or any one in his camp claiming that attacks on his experience were racist. They’ve said some people will try to use race against him… and one can at least may a serious claim that mocking his name and making the false Muslim claims as an attempt to use his race to scare voters.
Again, after months of Ed and many on the Republican side accuse Obama of race-baiting, these claims of sexism are just laughable. Read that quote again by Fiorina. She overtly says that attacks on Palin’s experience are sexist.
Now you’re all having a hissy fit because Obama used the OLD “lipstick on a pig” analogy on McCain’s policy proposals.
It’s too funny to watch. Keep it up, seriously.
Tom_Shipley on September 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM
I don’t believe Obama meant to refer to Palin as the pig wearing lipstick. HOWEVER, his supporters took it that way by their reaction. This is where Obama should have made a comment that he wasn’t referring to her. Instead, he let the laughter and applause roll over him. Opportunity lost.
I would pull that ad at the RNC. It’s stupid. Let the media duke it out about what he meant instead.
moonsbreath on September 10, 2008 at 9:44 AM
Bill definitely wasn’t throwing him softballs. The in your face, don’t try to dance your way out of answering the question attitude is what made Bill so popular in the first place. It’s a pity he watered his show down so much with tabloid stuff and useless fluff.
backwoods conservative on September 10, 2008 at 9:45 AM
There is a string of incidents that Barry has perpetrated that hints of an awkwardness around white women:
-Calls white female reporter “sweetie”
-Sexist remarks and obscene gesture directed at Hillary
-Calls his white grandmother racist and a “typical white person”
-Makes the pig in lipstick comment about Gov. Palin
Could this be a deeply held prejudice against white women that stems from going through multiple divorces in his youth?
Hey if my governor, NY’s David Patterson, can go drilling for secret racism, can’t we go beach combing for expressed sexism?
scrub_oak on September 10, 2008 at 9:45 AM
Oh, that is a good catch, very astute. There is no doubt he took that from the cartoon…
right2bright on September 10, 2008 at 9:46 AM
I think the ad was and is the right way to go. This election, like it or not, is becoming about slip-ups and capitalizing on opponents gaffs.
Obama has used this tactic from Day 1 against Hillary and McCain.
Also, I agree with most here that Obama DID in fact mean to insult/demean Palin and McCain…which is all fine and dandy and you make your bed and all that. But my God, what kind of rookie mistake is it to use imagery from probably the most memorable line from EITHER convention.
Barack Obama: Ready To Lead (foot first)
Waterboy on September 10, 2008 at 9:46 AM
Well, maybe it was “clever.”
But it damn sure wasn’t smart.
I’m sure Barry thinks himself quite the clever little class clown, shooting Hillary the bird dusting off his shoulders and then even going on after this particular remark to say that his two daughters tire him and Michelle out, implying–no doubt–that five must just be too exhausting for anyone to handle and do anything else.
But we’re not going to elect Eddie Haskell President.
So I hope he enjoyed the laugh from the crowd. Because however Team Maverick plays it, this is a loser for Barry O.
Typhoon on September 10, 2008 at 9:47 AM
I think Ed and others are exhibiting a bit of Obama Derangement Syndrome over this quote.
jim m on September 10, 2008 at 9:48 AM
Two points. And I apologize for the second, but I’ll mention it because your comments regarding Obama’s playing the race card are simply lies.
First, Obama has whined about GOP racism throughout the summer. And now his supporters are citing the GOP’s ridicule of his Mickey Mouse position as a community organizer as code for black. Code for shakedown, maybe, but not code for black.
Second, Cique De Ole. Is that the new Hispanic acrobatic troupe patterned after Cirque du Soleil?
http://www.cirquedusoleil.com/cirquedusoleil/default.htm
BuckeyeSam on September 10, 2008 at 9:48 AM
Obama meant both lines as insults to our hockey mom barracuda. No doubt whatsoever. As I said last night, this man is a sociopath. He despises women. He COUNTS on decent people giving him the doubt. You cannot beat him if you do not see him clearly.
texette on September 10, 2008 at 9:48 AM
I completely disagree with pushing this any further. Back off it and play the high road now. The story’s got wings. Let the surrogates and media chew on it. McCain/ Palin will just lower themselves if they push it much further that a subtle dig in speeches.
This does, however, open the door the numerous Clinton accusations of sexism from the primaries. There is LOTS of mileage to be had from using Clinton as a video surrogate. It forces her to look like a hypocrite, blunts any speeches she gives and pits Dems against Dems on the ugly stuff, freeing McCain and Palin to talk about stuff that matters.
Plus, if Palin personally responds, it will be spun in to a “weak, crying woman who can’t handle the big kids game”
Damiano on September 10, 2008 at 9:48 AM
Thanks! I’m glad I’m not the only one who gets in too much of a hurry at times. Haha… :-)
Oh, and Ed… Thanks for the Update II. I think that really reinforces what happened with this current episode with Obama. Once might be an innocent gaffe… But that shows a clear and definite pattern of trying to be subtle (and not succeeding at all) using sexist references / comments.
I think it’s pretty clear what Obama is doing.
Nineball on September 10, 2008 at 9:50 AM
The ad is good. Whenever anyone says anything like, “Barack Hussein Obama,” McCain is quick to denounce such comments.
Obama clearly knew how his audience interpreted the comment, and said nothing. That is Obama’s character and integrity out in the open for everyone to see.
El_Terrible on September 10, 2008 at 9:50 AM
Team McCain’s communication team blows. There is no message consistency, they’re just flailing… They should resist playing the absolute morality card with sexism. This was just a simple insult… Don’t whine, don’t be Beta…
ninjapirate on September 10, 2008 at 9:52 AM
I don’t think McCain should play it up anymore. This ad can’t be for TV anyway, right? Mac doesn’t do the obligatory “My name…and I approve this msg”.
This story should be Drudge driven, if they overplay it it’ll look bad.
Spirit of 1776 on September 10, 2008 at 9:52 AM
I think he meant to do it.
I don’t want the McCain camp to go down this road.
MayBee on September 10, 2008 at 9:52 AM
Damiano 9:49am,
I agree it may be best to take a brief breather, having released this ad so quickly…good job!
Yet, the matter should not under any circumstances be dropped. Timing IS critical. As you suggest, it’s a good idea to let the public have it simmer in their own minds, and then assess whether it is of benefit to pursue it more aggressively or not.
Does Zerobama even HAVE “the foot” enough to shoot himself in?!
Lockstein13 on September 10, 2008 at 9:53 AM
That struck me too. If I had been O’Reilly, I would have told him to back off. Really, what was up with that? Obama has clearly been on too many shows like Oprah and The View. Maybe Obama is one of those “close talkers” like Judge Reinhold’s character on a memorable episode of Seinfeld.
Seriously, he is not the guy I want leading our country on important policy matters, leading the military, and making U.S. Supreme Court appointments.
BuckeyeSam on September 10, 2008 at 9:54 AM
i don’t know if it was mentioned already, but don’t forget about the time Obama called the reporter “sweetie”
darkegop on September 10, 2008 at 9:55 AM
Second, Cique De Ole. Is that the new Hispanic acrobatic troupe patterned after Cirque du Soleil?
LOL… I caught that after I wrote it. I really need to read posts before I publish them.
First, Obama has whined about GOP racism throughout the summer.
Claims of his being Muslim and Osama Hussein Obama monikers pre-date the summer.
ANd I don’t buy the belittling community organization stuff as racist… it was stupid and ignorant, but not racist.
Tom_Shipley on September 10, 2008 at 9:55 AM
Its not like he said Macacka cause that is really over the line, RIGHT?
Bicyea on September 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Update: Fox News is reporting that the moron junior/state senator from Illinois will be addressing the “Lipstick on a Pig” insult shortly.
Message Control, anyone?
Jaibones on September 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM
BHO : How’s the air up there ?
Fuquay Steve on September 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM
He was not belittled. The community organizer comparison by Palin was a response to the initial statement by Obama belittling Palin as just a mayor of “Wasilly.”
It’s apparent that you continue to leave out context for the sake of your argument.
geckomon on September 10, 2008 at 10:03 AM
I’d like to see Romney, Huck and all the female Republicans come out of the woodwork on this. The Gov. of Hawaii and the blonde Rep. from TN come immediately to mind.
McCain and Palin have got better things to do.
And the Truth Squad needs to light a fire under Obama’s butt about firing Howard Gutman.
Damiano on September 10, 2008 at 10:03 AM
OH LOOK !!!
Now, we’re gonna’ get a “Major Address” on the “pig” comment.
HAHHAHAHHAHAH!!!
franksalterego on September 10, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Well, ya…if the shoe fits, Uh-bam-uh will wear it.
Montana on September 10, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Tom S –
I don’t see how the “Muslim and Hussein” memes are racist, either. As best I can tell, the Muslim faith is a non-racially specific (and very large and diverse) religion.
My sense is that the only ones to perceive a benefit out of the campaign-related discussion of Obama’s self-declared African-Americanness are employed at this time by Obama.
Jaibones on September 10, 2008 at 10:06 AM
Now, we’re gonna’ get a “Major Address” on the “pig” comment.
Yeah, on Letterman.
Tom_Shipley on September 10, 2008 at 10:07 AM
carbon_footprint on September 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM
Yes! The touching is a “reassuring gesture” isn’t it? Like, “I hear you.” Not sure. Maybe someone w/body language knowledge knows that. I’m sure Tanya will dissect on Monday.
All I know is if Barry says, “now, now let’s be clear…” again, I’m going to explode. It’s as bad as “my friends”. Ugh!
JAM on September 10, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Come on people. You really think Obama was calling Palin a pig? Come on. This is nuts.
SoulGlo on September 10, 2008 at 10:07 AM
I don’t think anyone associated with the McCain team has implied Obama is racist. It’s come from a few far, far out blogs and a lot of the debunking has come from blogs like HotAir.
The sexist comments are coming straight out of Camp Obama.
BadgerHawk on September 10, 2008 at 10:08 AM
You really think he wasn’t? Come on.
Darksean on September 10, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Whoa – just looked at that Obama-flipping-the-bird-to-Hillary clip again. Holy cow – it was never more clear to me just how intentional that gesture was. Incredible -
RD on September 10, 2008 at 10:11 AM
As an Obama opponent, I will concede Tom’s point that Obama’s resume point as a “community organizer” has been widely belittled; I don’t think that’s debatable. There have been a variety of reasons for the ridicule, and let me just list a few:
- Obama cited this as relevant experience for his candidacy (ridicule-worthy? Check)
- Journalist investigations into the nature and success of his work as a community organizer on Chicago’s south side (ridicule-worthy? Check)
- His association with the criminal vote-fraud generating organization ACORN during this time (ridicule-worthy? Check)
The job was ridiculous, and I have joyfully belittled it. No sense hiding from that.
Jaibones on September 10, 2008 at 10:12 AM
Pig-gate. Or is it Lipstick-gate.
Paul-Cincy on September 10, 2008 at 10:12 AM
What Barack Hussein Obama meant to say is:
SaintOlaf on September 10, 2008 at 10:12 AM
The real problem is not that he smeared Palin . . . it’s that this was a stupid, “dumb-ass” comment that reflects directly on his character, judgement, good sense and intellect.
rplat on September 10, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Attn: SoulGlo on September 10, 2008 at 10:07 AM
+1
Come on.
Jaibones on September 10, 2008 at 10:13 AM
And yes I think we’re all aware of what he was referencing with his “stinky old fish” comment….and it wasn’t Mccain.
SaintOlaf on September 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM
the smug smile…we have a ten year old running for office….
I thought that junk was clever as an early teen…Barry is stuck at the point he figured out none of his parents gave a damn about him in development.
Were he not running for office I’d feel badly for him.
sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Dude! Where ya been?
Jaibones on September 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Wasn’t sure myself until I considered that the “old fish” remark makes no sense by itself, or in context, unless its second meaning somehow applies to John McCain.
If true, it would amount to one insult each for the two front-runners. Is there another, less damning, interpretation that holds up to scrutiny?
RD on September 10, 2008 at 10:15 AM
I really think this Oguy is VERY clueless/dangerous.
It’s obvious that his handlers fed him the phrases in the cartoon, believing it to be a clever way to make their point.
Then, suggesting he go with the lipstick comment to follow, they all sat around and guffawed and agreed to go with it.
From where I stand, the ‘hand around the face crap’ gives it away.. he KNEW the firestorm to ensue, and used it anyway.
Also, the Hillary video reveals his amateur status, too… the finger to Hillary.
Watch it carefully.. yes, he used his middle finger to touch his face, but I attribute that to his passive-aggressive INSTINCTS, and that it really wasn’t THOUGHTFULLY intentional. WHY ??
Because, as the vid continues, he really can’t figure out what made the audience respond to his statement with such ‘vigor’ and ‘enthusiasm’.
He’s completely lost, right ?? Anyone else see this ??
Utterly clueless.
God help us all if he ends up face-to-face with other world leaders !!
I agree with letting this drop.. let our ‘Cuda just swim past this garbage.
pambi on September 10, 2008 at 10:16 AM
1. He did it on purpose.
2. Team Obama wanted Team McCain to freak out and kneejerk with a play to the absolute moral authority card …
3. They wanted to get the dual message out there.
Hey Team McCain, way to walk into the trap and get your news cycle hijacked… you should have shrugged it off or mocked him back. Whining and being Outraged! only works if you have the press sympathetic to your concerns… You ended up empowering him. GG
ninjapirate on September 10, 2008 at 10:17 AM
I like your approach…maybe throwing in that “I hope that if he ever meets with a foreign dignitary he does not make the same mistake”…
right2bright on September 10, 2008 at 10:17 AM
I had never seen it. And yeah, it was intentional. That big grin on his face after he did it was a dead giveaway.
backwoods conservative on September 10, 2008 at 10:18 AM
Amen! Well, at least his unsupervised, butt-kick-free, smug adolescence brought us some other great comedy moments, such as the “Choom Gang…”
RD on September 10, 2008 at 10:18 AM
He can’t resist.
That IS the problem, they call McCain the psycho but BHO is a damned passive-aggressive compulsive.
sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 10:19 AM
I hope Obama is so marginalizing himself through his language that his crowds will begin to restrict themselves to those who hoot and holler at his snide comments and adolescent allusions. I have to think most people reject that schtick and so reject him.
Paul-Cincy on September 10, 2008 at 10:20 AM
I don’t see how they walked into a trap. Obama needing to address it on Letterman is evidence enough any trap wasn’t sprung correctly. They see it as a further bash on women, a constituency they’ve been losing badly in the past two weeks.
No, they meant to do it, if only for the benefit of the (situational) sexist crowd he was speaking to, but didn’t count on it getting noticed. Now, some women on the fence about Obama will leave. He’s bleeding female voters.
Darksean on September 10, 2008 at 10:20 AM
Two points.
First, he deserves derision because it’s a joke of a position–no responsibilities, no accomplishments, yet celebrated in his biography.
Second, he deserves derision because his campaign first ridiculed Palin for her service as a mayor of a small town. Obama cannot claim that that remark came from people over whom he has no control. The element of experience that he’s now so loudly lauding is his conduct of his presidential campaign. If Obama doesn’t have enough control over his own campaign to issue a civil welcome to the GOP VP candidate who is making a historic run of her own and on the day after McCain’s commendable ad congratulaing Obama on Obama’s nomination, he deserves what he gets.
Obama opened the door to ridicule and stood directly behind it. It’s his tough luck that Guiliani and Palin kicked it open and broke his nose. He was bloodied by their remarks, and he’ll remain bloodied by them because they drew a big red circle around what a joke his community organizing represents on his resume.
BuckeyeSam on September 10, 2008 at 10:21 AM
and recall the smarm…
“the PUMAs are too smart to vote for McCain”….
well Barry you are smart enough to drive them to either do so or stay at home or not donate….none of which aid YOU.
sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 10:22 AM
This man wants to be president of the United States: a job that requires a VERY thick skin and an exceptional ability to take the heat. Barack Obama is simply incapable of either; he is NOT qualified to be the president. The other thing is that he is clearly unable to pick his personal battles enough to leave room for the battles he has to fight as president; he is SO defensive and incapable of letting it all slide off his back that he will end up making a mess of everything at one of the most sensitive times in the history of the world. He is arrogance and lack of judgement are horrific…HE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. Period.
Nastaran on September 10, 2008 at 10:25 AM
Yes, I’m surprised the shift has been as pronounced as it currently seems. Perhaps the shift is more due to non-PUMA affiliated independents and conservative Dems than Hillary backers (though there’s evidence that’s happening as well).
Darksean on September 10, 2008 at 10:25 AM
Does anybody besides me remember that Bob Beckel, a Democrat strategist, blatantly and clearly called Palin a pig on Fox News this week? Does this not suggest a pattern?
fossten on September 10, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Is it just me, or does anyone else here think that in the last 11 days, this has de-evolved into the ugliest campaign in history.
Obama and his BS is bad enough, but the media IMO has gotten so bad as to be unwatchable. Especially CNN. MSNBC has always been pathetic, but at least they are nothing but left wing commentary, even by their own admission. CNN on the other hand is pulling news items directly from Huffpo and Daily Kos (even citing the sites by name) and reporting as news without even a feeble attempt at fact checking. Then they set 2 Democrats against 1 Republican on it for “commentary”.
Damiano on September 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Lol!
You must not understand that obama is finished now because of this…
He just insulted half of the population.
No way women will vote for Hussein O now.
SaintOlaf on September 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM
I like that approach.
And that’s what this is to me anyway. It’s not so much that he was probably backhandedly calling her a pig, it’s that he was so incompetent that he said that without realizing what people would see.
Tom, if you really believe he didn’t mean his skin color when he said that he doesn’t look like the guys on the dollar bills, then boy do I have a deal for you.
Esthier on September 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM
I’m just sayin’:
Palin says lipstick.
Obama says ‘My Muslim Faith’
Obama invokes a pig against lipstick.
Makes sense to me.
Just sayin’….. Nothing to do with sexism at all…..
http://www.countryaboveself.com
ilitigant on September 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »