<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rasmussen: Only 29% of Obama supporters think Supreme Court should decide cases based on Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 08:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Barton Bulletin &#187; The Constitution: Whatever Judges Appointed by The One Think It Should Be.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-2661649</link>
		<dc:creator>The Barton Bulletin &#187; The Constitution: Whatever Judges Appointed by The One Think It Should Be.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-2661649</guid>
		<description>[...] that the next time some LefTard brings-up their Talking Points on the matter &#8211; or as Allahpundit put it&#8230; Quote:  A friendly reminder from the Enlightened of how much more profound their respect [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the next time some LefTard brings-up their Talking Points on the matter &#8211; or as Allahpundit put it&#8230; Quote:  A friendly reminder from the Enlightened of how much more profound their respect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good news: Obama promises Souter&#8217;s replacement will be big on &#8220;empathy&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-2164478</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good news: Obama promises Souter&#8217;s replacement will be big on &#8220;empathy&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-2164478</guid>
		<description>[...] empathy&#8217;s a good thing, right? Right &#8212; but not when it&#8217;s being used as code. Refresh your memory; The One&#8217;s fans will know exactly what he means he says this: &#8220;I will seek somebody [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] empathy&#8217;s a good thing, right? Right &#8212; but not when it&#8217;s being used as code. Refresh your memory; The One&#8217;s fans will know exactly what he means he says this: &#8220;I will seek somebody [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Americans Against Obama</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1419044</link>
		<dc:creator>Americans Against Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1419044</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obama Supporters: Don&#8217;t Let Constitution Get in the Way of Judges Decisions...&lt;/strong&gt;


More proof that Obama supporters and cultists are nothing more than far left drones, we have this latest poll.
While 82% of voters who support McCain believe the justices should rule on what is in the Constitution, just 29% of Barack Obama’s support...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama Supporters: Don&rsquo;t Let Constitution Get in the Way of Judges Decisions&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>More proof that Obama supporters and cultists are nothing more than far left drones, we have this latest poll.<br />
While 82% of voters who support McCain believe the justices should rule on what is in the Constitution, just 29% of Barack Obama’s support&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Constitution: Whatever Judges Appointed by The One Think It Should Be. &#124; The Minority Report &#171; The Barton Bulletin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1403591</link>
		<dc:creator>The Constitution: Whatever Judges Appointed by The One Think It Should Be. &#124; The Minority Report &#171; The Barton Bulletin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1403591</guid>
		<description>[...] that the next time some LefTard brings-up their Talking Points on the matter - or as Allahpundit put it&#8230; Quote: A friendly reminder from the Enlightened of how much more profound their respect for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the next time some LefTard brings-up their Talking Points on the matter &#8211; or as Allahpundit put it&#8230; Quote: A friendly reminder from the Enlightened of how much more profound their respect for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Half of Obama supporters think SCOTUS rulings should not follow Constitution &#124; Conservative247</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1403521</link>
		<dc:creator>Half of Obama supporters think SCOTUS rulings should not follow Constitution &#124; Conservative247</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1403521</guid>
		<description>[...] Air reminds us that this is one reason that you must vote for McCain, who has promised to nominate judges who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Air reminds us that this is one reason that you must vote for McCain, who has promised to nominate judges who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montana</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1403503</link>
		<dc:creator>Montana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1403503</guid>
		<description>The problem is that Liberals are clueless. On all topics. Especially on History and how and why the United States was formed, structured and built. They do not understand the Constitution. They do not understand division of power.

Clueless. Moonbats.

This is why debating them is so very annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that Liberals are clueless. On all topics. Especially on History and how and why the United States was formed, structured and built. They do not understand the Constitution. They do not understand division of power.</p>
<p>Clueless. Moonbats.</p>
<p>This is why debating them is so very annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madmonkphotog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1403200</link>
		<dc:creator>madmonkphotog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1403200</guid>
		<description>Sounds like communism to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like communism to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dtestard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1402240</link>
		<dc:creator>dtestard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1402240</guid>
		<description>Obama on the Constitution.  From:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/9/0451/30890/148/591748

&quot;The reason that you have this principle is not to be soft on terrorism. It&#039;s because that&#039;s who we are. That&#039;s what we&#039;re protecting,&quot; Obama said, his voice growing louder and the crowd rising to its feet to cheer. &quot;Don&#039;t mock the Constitution. Don&#039;t make fun of it. Don&#039;t suggest that it&#039;s not American to abide by what the founding fathers set up. It&#039;s worked *pretty well* for over 200 years.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama on the Constitution.  From:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/9/0451/30890/148/591748" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/9/0451/30890/148/591748</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The reason that you have this principle is not to be soft on terrorism. It&#8217;s because that&#8217;s who we are. That&#8217;s what we&#8217;re protecting,&#8221; Obama said, his voice growing louder and the crowd rising to its feet to cheer. &#8220;Don&#8217;t mock the Constitution. Don&#8217;t make fun of it. Don&#8217;t suggest that it&#8217;s not American to abide by what the founding fathers set up. It&#8217;s worked *pretty well* for over 200 years.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1402162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1402162</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What is “social justice”?

BobMbx on September 9, 2008 at 12:52 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Quest-Cosmic-Justice-Thomas-Sowell/dp/0684864630&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Read &lt;/a&gt;it.  Understand it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What is “social justice”?</p>
<p>BobMbx on September 9, 2008 at 12:52 PM</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Quest-Cosmic-Justice-Thomas-Sowell/dp/0684864630" rel="nofollow">Read </a>it.  Understand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seixon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1402098</link>
		<dc:creator>Seixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1402098</guid>
		<description>Stop mocking the Constitution, ehm, Palin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop mocking the Constitution, ehm, Palin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So long as we&#8217;re comparing constitutionalists to the Taliban and Muslim extremists&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401703</link>
		<dc:creator>So long as we&#8217;re comparing constitutionalists to the Taliban and Muslim extremists&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401703</guid>
		<description>[...] h/t Dan. More, from Allah and the fine elites at TNR, whose Josh Patashnik complains: this [poll] reflects very poorly on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] h/t Dan. More, from Allah and the fine elites at TNR, whose Josh Patashnik complains: this [poll] reflects very poorly on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldwarrior</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401573</link>
		<dc:creator>coldwarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401573</guid>
		<description>Canadian Imperialist Running Dog on September 9, 2008 at 2:36 PM --

Add to that the willingness of so many Dems to sanction illegal imigration.  One would think the unions would be all over this.  Jobs are being lost daily because illegals easily undercut local wages in the building trades and a lot of other trades. Day laborers and longer term illegal employees most often paid in cash, most often do not demand health care coverage, most often make no bones about worker&#039;s comp, and all the rest.  Meanwhile, as one of the painters said, American workers, union members, are unemployed because there is no work for them.  

That&#039;s sounds like a real winning ticket...prevent investment and growth of industry and business, and then prevent employment of legal workers, non-union and union alike.

Yet, the Dems have the unions in their pockets and the unions have the Dems in their pockets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian Imperialist Running Dog on September 9, 2008 at 2:36 PM &#8211;</p>
<p>Add to that the willingness of so many Dems to sanction illegal imigration.  One would think the unions would be all over this.  Jobs are being lost daily because illegals easily undercut local wages in the building trades and a lot of other trades. Day laborers and longer term illegal employees most often paid in cash, most often do not demand health care coverage, most often make no bones about worker&#8217;s comp, and all the rest.  Meanwhile, as one of the painters said, American workers, union members, are unemployed because there is no work for them.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s sounds like a real winning ticket&#8230;prevent investment and growth of industry and business, and then prevent employment of legal workers, non-union and union alike.</p>
<p>Yet, the Dems have the unions in their pockets and the unions have the Dems in their pockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Imperialist Running Dog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401455</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Imperialist Running Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401455</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;…and these guys are union.

coldwarrior on September 9, 2008 at 2:11 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As a member of a union, I still don&#039;t understand why unions seem to want to continue to allign themselves with these useless tools.  Every time they propose a new regulation that makes it harder for corporations and small business owners to keep providing jobs, they are just shooting themselves in the foot. Hell, just take a look at what the greens are doing to the oil, gas and mining industries for an example, opposing new job creation because they &#039;believe&#039; that the great big fusion reactor in the sky has less of an effect on our climate than us humans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>…and these guys are union.</p>
<p>coldwarrior on September 9, 2008 at 2:11 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>As a member of a union, I still don&#8217;t understand why unions seem to want to continue to allign themselves with these useless tools.  Every time they propose a new regulation that makes it harder for corporations and small business owners to keep providing jobs, they are just shooting themselves in the foot. Hell, just take a look at what the greens are doing to the oil, gas and mining industries for an example, opposing new job creation because they &#8216;believe&#8217; that the great big fusion reactor in the sky has less of an effect on our climate than us humans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba Redneck</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401431</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba Redneck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401431</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What is “social justice”?
I’m sure it is among the things that black liberation theology demands from God before they will begin negotiations with Him.

snaggletoothie on September 9, 2008 at 2:02 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It ain&#039;t God&#039;s fault, it&#039;s Whitey&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What is “social justice”?<br />
I’m sure it is among the things that black liberation theology demands from God before they will begin negotiations with Him.</p>
<p>snaggletoothie on September 9, 2008 at 2:02 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It ain&#8217;t God&#8217;s fault, it&#8217;s Whitey&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba Redneck</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401424</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba Redneck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401424</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Just curious, how many of the 29% happened to have actually taken the time to read the Constitution?

pilamaye on September 9, 2008 at 1:57 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

None.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Just curious, how many of the 29% happened to have actually taken the time to read the Constitution?</p>
<p>pilamaye on September 9, 2008 at 1:57 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>None.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldwarrior</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401337</link>
		<dc:creator>coldwarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401337</guid>
		<description>Have to share this...

Have had a little home repair going on for the last two days.  One of the painters asked me what I was typing so feverishly on the computer.  I showed him that 1:27 post.  He showed the other guys.

Three more votes for McCain!

...and these guys are union.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to share this&#8230;</p>
<p>Have had a little home repair going on for the last two days.  One of the painters asked me what I was typing so feverishly on the computer.  I showed him that 1:27 post.  He showed the other guys.</p>
<p>Three more votes for McCain!</p>
<p>&#8230;and these guys are union.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: progressoverpeace</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401325</link>
		<dc:creator>progressoverpeace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401325</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Only 29% of Obama supporters think Supreme Court should decide cases based on Constitution&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I guess that means that 71% of Hussein&#039;s own supporters thought that he wasted his time in law school - (allegedly) studying a document that they don&#039;t even think means anything.  Hmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Only 29% of Obama supporters think Supreme Court should decide cases based on Constitution</p></blockquote>
<p>I guess that means that 71% of Hussein&#8217;s own supporters thought that he wasted his time in law school &#8211; (allegedly) studying a document that they don&#8217;t even think means anything.  Hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba Redneck</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401326</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba Redneck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401326</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What is “social justice”?
BobMbx on September 9, 2008 at 12:52 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


BobMbx:

Blaming one&#039;s problems on either: a) Whitey; b) &quot;The Man&quot;; c) your terrible childhood (so your parents in essence); d) the cops; e) Reagan, Bush I and Bush II; f) western civilization in general and the United States in particular; g) racism (both overt and subliminal); h) immigration policies that are actually enforced; i) lack of state run health care; j) lack of state run child care; k) anti abortionists that forced me to have unprotected sex with anyone, anytime; l) drug laws; m) corporate greed and multinationals; n) too little welfare; o) the military or; p) some combination of the above.  Note that the combination can and usually does change depending on the particular problem or moral failing.  As personal responsibility is &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; an issue fixing, or better yet eliminating, (a) through (p) above will lead to social justice.  This can only be done if wealth is redistributed, &lt;em&gt;not created mind you but redistributed&lt;/em&gt;, from those who worked hard for it to those that because of (a)-(p) above, have none.

In short: I have no money because I don&#039;t want to work and you have money which is your fault and an injustice to me.  I want money, I don&#039;t want to work, so I&#039;ll take yours by any means possible and that is justice for me.

This is, or some slight variation thereof, is what you pay huge sums of money to have liberal professors indoctrinate your children with.

For a recent example of this done on a large scale, take RushBaby&#039;s advice above and read &quot;The Gulag Archipelago&quot;. 

I hope this helps.

Next question.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What is “social justice”?<br />
BobMbx on September 9, 2008 at 12:52 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>BobMbx:</p>
<p>Blaming one&#8217;s problems on either: a) Whitey; b) &#8220;The Man&#8221;; c) your terrible childhood (so your parents in essence); d) the cops; e) Reagan, Bush I and Bush II; f) western civilization in general and the United States in particular; g) racism (both overt and subliminal); h) immigration policies that are actually enforced; i) lack of state run health care; j) lack of state run child care; k) anti abortionists that forced me to have unprotected sex with anyone, anytime; l) drug laws; m) corporate greed and multinationals; n) too little welfare; o) the military or; p) some combination of the above.  Note that the combination can and usually does change depending on the particular problem or moral failing.  As personal responsibility is <em>never</em> an issue fixing, or better yet eliminating, (a) through (p) above will lead to social justice.  This can only be done if wealth is redistributed, <em>not created mind you but redistributed</em>, from those who worked hard for it to those that because of (a)-(p) above, have none.</p>
<p>In short: I have no money because I don&#8217;t want to work and you have money which is your fault and an injustice to me.  I want money, I don&#8217;t want to work, so I&#8217;ll take yours by any means possible and that is justice for me.</p>
<p>This is, or some slight variation thereof, is what you pay huge sums of money to have liberal professors indoctrinate your children with.</p>
<p>For a recent example of this done on a large scale, take RushBaby&#8217;s advice above and read &#8220;The Gulag Archipelago&#8221;. </p>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
<p>Next question&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401321</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401321</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama says terrorist have “legitimate” claims.

(No, I’m not kidding)

Maxx on September 9, 2008 at 1:25 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ron Paul must&#039;ve influenced him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Obama says terrorist have “legitimate” claims.</p>
<p>(No, I’m not kidding)</p>
<p>Maxx on September 9, 2008 at 1:25 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ron Paul must&#8217;ve influenced him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snaggletoothie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401295</link>
		<dc:creator>snaggletoothie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401295</guid>
		<description>What is &quot;social justice&quot;?
I&#039;m sure it is among the things that black liberation theology demands from God before they will begin negotiations with Him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is &#8220;social justice&#8221;?<br />
I&#8217;m sure it is among the things that black liberation theology demands from God before they will begin negotiations with Him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q: What&#8217;s the difference between Dr Juan Cole and a pitbull?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401276</link>
		<dc:creator>Q: What&#8217;s the difference between Dr Juan Cole and a pitbull?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401276</guid>
		<description>[...] And it is this &#8212; more than the misdirection and scare tactics people like Cole like to raise about Palin&#8217;s &#8220;fundamentalist&#8221; religious convictions &#8212; that truly scares progressives, particularly those that recognize in Palin a walking rebuke to the idea of a &#8220;Living Constitution.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And it is this &#8212; more than the misdirection and scare tactics people like Cole like to raise about Palin&#8217;s &#8220;fundamentalist&#8221; religious convictions &#8212; that truly scares progressives, particularly those that recognize in Palin a walking rebuke to the idea of a &#8220;Living Constitution.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: locomotivebreath1901</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401274</link>
		<dc:creator>locomotivebreath1901</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401274</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;If we can find people who have life experience and they understand what it means to be on the outside, what it means to have the system not work for them, that&#039;s the kind of person I want on the Supreme Court.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Exit answer: existential angst.

Great big churning pools of relativism &amp; rebellion. It&#039;s at the heart of liberalism. Yet, ironically, only an anointed paternal/maternal figure can properly understand &amp; moderate.

A classic &#039;lost boys syndrome&#039;. 

The libs flock to it, and demand &#039;the one&#039;, or whomever to fix it all &#039;cause that&#039;s what mommy did. Only it&#039;s played out in a perverse worship of celebrity cult chic.

Sacrilege if you dare to criticize. And don&#039;t confuse the nutroots with facts.

I think there&#039;s a big disconnect between Barry&#039;s world of theory &amp; academics, and the mean street waltz that a lot of his followers dance. Mob rule. That is their constitution. Denver &amp; St. Paul were illustration of the principle. 

Contrary opinions or philosophies will not be tolerated. Nutroots shout. Demonstrate. Harass. Assault. Vandalize &amp; steal. Politics of personal destruction is the rule. Reasoned debate is the exception.

But Barry doesn&#039;t get it. He&#039;s expendable to them. Maddening crowds and adoring fans are fickle that way.

The rule of Law, not men used to be a high ideal proudly taught to school children everywhere. We have a Republic based on such things. Not perfect but the ideal is there to be played out by decent people. We have a Republic - if we can hold onto it, and not let the mean streets trample it under foot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;If we can find people who have life experience and they understand what it means to be on the outside, what it means to have the system not work for them, that&#8217;s the kind of person I want on the Supreme Court.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Exit answer: existential angst.</p>
<p>Great big churning pools of relativism &amp; rebellion. It&#8217;s at the heart of liberalism. Yet, ironically, only an anointed paternal/maternal figure can properly understand &amp; moderate.</p>
<p>A classic &#8216;lost boys syndrome&#8217;. </p>
<p>The libs flock to it, and demand &#8216;the one&#8217;, or whomever to fix it all &#8217;cause that&#8217;s what mommy did. Only it&#8217;s played out in a perverse worship of celebrity cult chic.</p>
<p>Sacrilege if you dare to criticize. And don&#8217;t confuse the nutroots with facts.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a big disconnect between Barry&#8217;s world of theory &amp; academics, and the mean street waltz that a lot of his followers dance. Mob rule. That is their constitution. Denver &amp; St. Paul were illustration of the principle. </p>
<p>Contrary opinions or philosophies will not be tolerated. Nutroots shout. Demonstrate. Harass. Assault. Vandalize &amp; steal. Politics of personal destruction is the rule. Reasoned debate is the exception.</p>
<p>But Barry doesn&#8217;t get it. He&#8217;s expendable to them. Maddening crowds and adoring fans are fickle that way.</p>
<p>The rule of Law, not men used to be a high ideal proudly taught to school children everywhere. We have a Republic based on such things. Not perfect but the ideal is there to be played out by decent people. We have a Republic &#8211; if we can hold onto it, and not let the mean streets trample it under foot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pilamaye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401264</link>
		<dc:creator>pilamaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401264</guid>
		<description>Just curious, how many of the 29% happened to have actually taken the time to read the Constitution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, how many of the 29% happened to have actually taken the time to read the Constitution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akzed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401229</link>
		<dc:creator>Akzed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401229</guid>
		<description>So many?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orlandocajun</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/rasmussen-only-29-of-obama-supporters-think-supreme-court-should-decide-cases-based-on-constitution/comment-page-2/#comment-1401215</link>
		<dc:creator>orlandocajun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=26212#comment-1401215</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Most American voters (60%) agrees and says the Supreme Court should make decisions based on what is written in the constitution, while 30% say rulings should be guided on the judge’s sense of fairness and justice.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m more stunned at the 60% number than I am the 29%. That pretty much means that 40% of the voters in this country don&#039;t believe in our constitution. That also means that the 40% are insane!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Most American voters (60%) agrees and says the Supreme Court should make decisions based on what is written in the constitution, while 30% say rulings should be guided on the judge’s sense of fairness and justice.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m more stunned at the 60% number than I am the 29%. That pretty much means that 40% of the voters in this country don&#8217;t believe in our constitution. That also means that the 40% are insane!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
