More disturbingly, it appears that the legislation was modified from its original form, in which it would apply to grades 6-12, but was re-drafted to include K-12. I just think that is completely ridiculous. Knowing how far left Obama is, we can infer that “age appropriate” is really cover for anything goes.El_Terrible on September 10, 2008 at 1:18 AM

I linked to the actual Bill itself in my quoting of you.

Unless there is some bevy of percieved sexual activity between K-6 I do not see any reason for the State to have to give briefings on sexual harassment to my child. I cannot think of any net benefit to any activity but educating a child about the sanctity of their own body and the fact no one has a right to manipulate them. Occam’s razor says that either the State of Illinois was unable to teach children this fact, OR there is some other purpose at work in lowering the age gate.

Sorry, but I don’t think the McCain ad was saying that Barry believes in how to manuals being required but I cannot disagree that he has made it possible.

Morality is my job, not the state’s…their job is reading, writing, and math.

sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 4:01 AM

Election ‘08: Democrats’ reintroduction of militant Michelle Obama in Denver was supposed to show her softer side. But it only highlighted a radical part of her resume: Public Allies.

Barack Obama was a founding member of the board of Public Allies in 1992, resigning before his wife became executive director of the Chicago chapter of Public Allies in 1993. Obama plans to use the nonprofit group, which he features on his campaign Web site, as the model for a national service corps. He calls his Orwellian program, “Universal Voluntary Public Service.”

Big Brother had nothing on the Obamas. They plan to herd American youth into government-funded reeducation camps where they’ll be brainwashed into thinking America is a racist, oppressive place in need of “social change.”

Check out the youtube about 16 and 23 minutes in

Barry sez:

Just as we must value and encourage military service across our society, we must honor and expand other opportunities to serve. Because the future of our nation depends on the soldier at Fort Carson, but it also depends on the teacher in East LA, or the nurse in Appalachia, the after-school worker in New Orleans, the Peace Corps volunteer in Africa, the Foreign Service officer in Indonesia. . . .

Today, AmeriCorps – our nation’s network of local, state and national service programs – has 75,000 slots. And I know firsthand the quality of these programs. My wife Michelle once left her job at a law firm at city hall to be a founding director of an AmeriCorps program in Chicago that trains young people for careers in public service. These programs invest Americans in their communities and their country. They tap America’s greatest resource – our citizens.

That’s why as President, I will expand AmeriCorps to 250,000 slots, and make that increased service a vehicle to meet national goals like providing health care and education, saving our planet and restoring our standing in the world, so that citizens see their efforts connected to a common purpose. People of all ages, stations, and skills will be asked to serve. Because when it comes to the challenges we face, the American people are not the problem – they are the answer.

So we are going to send more college graduates to teach and mentor our young people. We’ll call on Americans to join an Energy Corps to conduct renewable energy and environmental cleanup projects in their neighborhoods all across the country. We will enlist our veterans to find jobs and support for other vets, to be there for our military families. And we’re going to grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered, and double the size of Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy.

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

Don’t we have a national security force of civillians that’s just as powerful, just as strong, and just as well funded as the Active duty military?

We call them the US National Guard V…..

what does Barack need a politically trained, civillian “security force” for V?

Why is whether or not Sarah Palin fucked Todd’s business partner more important than THIS issue?

You keep on hitting Sarah because sooner or later 2 things are gonna happen….

1) in looking at Sarah closer they’ll look at everyone closer

2) the press in response to the backlash that we WILL generate will be forced to at least finally pay lip service to vetting Barack….

I am *certain* the vast majority of the American People will LOVE things like this.

at best he is wanting to nationalize several hundred functions, and give them “parity” with the military and draw them into the federal web….

at worst he is a dimestore Il Duce, who wants to politically indoctrinate people…..

Public Allies is a group of protestors for hire

is any of this sounding familiar?

for him to get financial parity even if this “national security force” is totally benign” he is asking for federalizing 1 trillion more dollars of new spending, and dear God if he uses this is any way to indoctrinate like people suspect Annenburg was engaging in….

oh well whatever….

Sarah’s a slut and bristol’s a whore…..quick let’s whistle up a civillian national security force and a blogstorm to get it.

Team Barry removed the National Security Force from the transcripts they released

“If we’re going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn’t this rather a big deal?” Farah wrote. “I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together?

“Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he mean?” Farah wrote.

He added that he wants the help of “every other journalist who still thinks the American people have a right to know the specifics about a presidential candidate’s biggest and boldest initiatives before the election.”

Since Farah reported the statement, it’s been the subject of intense discussions on the Internet.

In a post on FreeRepublic.com, Sean Robins explains why he believes it’s likely one of Obama’s handlers counseled him to remove the two lines from the speech and then the senator decided to put them back in.

“Most of the time, when Obama flubs a line and attempts to recover, you can easily spot it,” Robins writes, but in this case, the lines are “delivered clearly, concisely, and succinctly, without any hint that they emanate from a flub.”

Robins speculates the lines were prepared and rehearsed ahead of time, the handler or handlers counseled him to take them out, and “in the moment of the speech, he decided, ‘they’re back in.’”

Robins says that while this is speculation, it points to the need to “pay closer attention to Obama’s speeches, for what is off the cuff, for what his trainers and handlers might not want him to say, but which he will continue to say anyway. We know he’s really good on a fixed script. And we know that he’s really bad on his own.”

so yeah…Stasi may not be far off….

sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 4:25 AM

Check out this youtube at 16 and 23 minutes in

Barry Says:

Quote:

Just as we must value and encourage military service across our society, we must honor and expand other opportunities to serve. Because the future of our nation depends on the soldier at Fort Carson, but it also depends on the teacher in East LA, or the nurse in Appalachia, the after-school worker in New Orleans, the Peace Corps volunteer in Africa, the Foreign Service officer in Indonesia. . . .

Today, AmeriCorps – our nation’s network of local, state and national service programs – has 75,000 slots. And I know firsthand the quality of these programs. My wife Michelle once left her job at a law firm at city hall to be a founding director of an AmeriCorps program in Chicago that trains young people for careers in public service. These programs invest Americans in their communities and their country. They tap America’s greatest resource – our citizens.

That’s why as President, I will expand AmeriCorps to 250,000 slots, and make that increased service a vehicle to meet national goals like providing health care and education, saving our planet and restoring our standing in the world, so that citizens see their efforts connected to a common purpose. People of all ages, stations, and skills will be asked to serve. Because when it comes to the challenges we face, the American people are not the problem – they are the answer.

So we are going to send more college graduates to teach and mentor our young people. We’ll call on Americans to join an Energy Corps to conduct renewable energy and environmental cleanup projects in their neighborhoods all across the country. We will enlist our veterans to find jobs and support for other vets, to be there for our military families. And we’re going to grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered, and double the size of Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy.

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

Don’t we have a national security force of civillians that’s just as powerful, just as strong, and just as well funded as the Active duty military?

We call them the US National Guard…..

what does Barack need a politically trained, civillian “security force” for?

Why is whether or not Sarah Palin screwed Todd’s business partner more important than THIS issue?

I want the donks to keep on hitting Sarah because sooner or later 2 things are gonna happen….

1) in looking at Sarah closer they’ll look at everyone closer

2) the press in response to the backlash that we WILL generate will be forced to at least finally pay lip service to vetting Barack….

I am *certain* the vast majority of the American People will LOVE things like this.

all the best,
sven

sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 4:41 AM

The transcripts from that speech were doctored to moit his wanting the security force as well

sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 4:43 AM

never mind….he was before life before he was against it

Cleveland, OH (LifeNews.com) — Senator Barack Obama debated his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton on Tuesday night and said his biggest mistake was voting with a unanimous Senate to help save Terri Schiavo. Terri is the disabled Florida woman whose husband won the legal right to starve her to death.

In March 2005, just weeks before Terri died from a painful 14-day starvation and dehydration death, Congress approved legislation allowing her family to take its case from state courts to federal courts in an effort to stop the euthanasia from proceeding.

Terri was not on any artificial breathing apparatus and only required a feeding tube to eat and drink. Her family had filed a lawsuit against her former husband to allow them to care for her and give her proper medical and rehabilitative care.

Captain Euthenizer

sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 4:56 AM

For the logical conclusion of this political direction, see Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge.

Aylios on September 10, 2008 at 4:58 AM

Yup.

“there any guns in your home?”

“your mom and dad do anything against the rules?”

Communism-100+ million dead since inception…..

“we’re a work in progress pardon the mess”

sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 5:01 AM

Cheap Shot by McCain.

jim m on September 10, 2008 at 10:41 AM

who determines \”age appropriate”?

The same sorts of clowns that decided public school “jihadi for a fortnight” classes are the way to go….

sorry Jim no sale….

they want to fight fondling?

Great I’m on board I guess the democrat dominated state had never done that before?

They want to leave an opening to Heather Has Two Mommies?

No sale.

sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 11:27 AM