Party identification difference down to one point?
posted at 9:20 am on September 8, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | regular view
Allahpundit flagged an interesting point in an updated version of the USA Today story on their latest polling in the presidential race. According to the internals of the Gallup survey, McCain’s ascension to the leadership of the GOP may have healed the brand. Democrats lead Republicans in party identification by a single point:
In the new survey, more voters call themselves Republicans. Now 48% say they’re Democrats or lean to the Democratic Party; 47% say they’re Republicans or lean to the GOP.
Not since February 2005, right after Bush’s second inauguration, have Republicans been within a single point of Democrats in party identification.
What’s more, voters by 48%-45% support the Democratic candidate in their congressional district, the party’s narrowest advantage this year.
Needless to say, this has huge implications for the election, and not just at the presidential level. Democrats had hoped to ride their large advantage to big gains in both the House and Senate this year. Voters have apparently begun realizing that Democrats controlled one of the most useless Congressional sessions in recent history, and the 9% approval ratings have finally taken their toll on Democratic leadership.
Energy policy is the likely locus for this sea change. Nancy Pelosi’s early adjournment without taking action to increase domestic production of oil — a policy favored by 70% of voters — undoubtedly damaged the party’s support, already weakening over the summer. Republicans have hammered Democrats for their refusal to create American jobs and keep American wealth at home, especially with the House Oil Party, and voters have begun to notice.
It also calls into question Obama’s coattails, and suggests much stronger coattails for McCain than anyone might have guessed. Of course, those coattails may belong to Sarah Palin, but regardless, the Republican ticket appears to have caught the nation’s attention, which apparently has begun fatiguing on Obamamania. Obama was supposed to redefine American politics with enthusiasm for Democrats, but now it looks like the opposite may be happening; Democratic identification has declined since the primaries, and Republicans have closed to a virtual dead heat. His uninspired choice of a Washington insider for a running mate on a ticket of “change” probably hasn’t helped much, either.
Hold on to those November narratives. Republicans may just pull a surprise in the House if these numbers continue to move in the GOP’s favor. They have the momentum now, and they need to keep pushing energy policy to fuel it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
Gucci, rather than having a constant dull roar of hand extensions a lot of veterans of this current conflict seem to have this wild notion of not seeing all they sacrificed for rendered to naught.
Barry a member of the “over the horizon to Okinawawa” Mothra school of geopolitics seems to make that less likely.
sven10077 on September 9, 2008 at 3:34 AM
If it means getting rid of the likes of Ted Stephens and Mitch McConnell, sign me up.
philwynk on September 9, 2008 at 5:25 AM
AP – Please read us the riot act. The gang of 14 (?) can derail any energy policy advantage. Lindsay F’in Graham (and his good ole buddies)have no clue, but they are capable of de-railing this train.
Fuquay Steve on September 9, 2008 at 7:14 AM
As I’ve said before - Sen. McCain has a chance to change the political landscape if he can realize that the election isn’t about him. He is an imperfect vehicle for what is needed, but Gov. Palin is the one to bring the message home. Starting in MI was good, and CO also good… when Gov. Palin starts to tour throughout Appalachia and show that small businesses hae an affinity with those in the blue collar area, when good, strong family life leads to understanding that government can’t do everything for you… then will I start to see that he gets the message. Sen. McCain can shift a region and the Nation by doing that. But only with a strong ‘ground game’ and just plowing through that region not only to garner support of those who have not been traditional supporters but to solidify more traditional support.
That and lots of hard work by Republican incumbents running for office to realize that they are the problem, not the solution. Change your ways or leave and let people willing to adhere to the idea of limited government, less intrusive government, and smaller government that is fiscally responsible run. You can lose individual fights and still win the war – something that the mayflies in politics and the media have forgotten. That takes a strong party… perhaps Gov. Palin should have some say in how the upper echelons of it hold themselves accountable after the election… that would be a welcome change that would bring hope to the party.
ajacksonian on September 9, 2008 at 8:38 AM
sven, I believe even the Bush Boy is now following BHO’s plan.
He’s supposedly gonna pull 8000 out of Iraq and redeploy additional troops where Barack said they were sorely needed in Afghanistan…!
How about them apples…?
J_Gocht on September 9, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Oh, Ooo… may be not so much.
“…In a speech to be delivered Tuesday, Bush says more forces could withdraw in the first half of 2009. But for now, the situation isn’t changing significantly.
Apparently we can’t get the arse holes to stand up so we can stand down…?
Damn fine political and military leadership goin’ on there…!
J_Gocht on September 9, 2008 at 10:31 AM
Rassmussen has this out…just over a quarter of Obama supporters think Supreme Court rulings should be based solely on the Constitution.
Gives one pause as to how the Dems view the Constitution and the GOP views the Constitution.
This Election is about a lot more than McCain and Obama. It is also about the next 25 years of having a Supreme Court that will adhere to the Constitution or 25 years of leftist legislation from the Bench.
On this alone, even if one has a personal beef with McCain, it should convince one to vote for McCain in November.
coldwarrior on September 9, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Constitutional interpretation is a portion of its mandate, cw…
J_Gocht on September 9, 2008 at 11:48 AM
For all of you who are so enthusiastic about the latest polls, here’s what the polls were showing around this time in the 2004 presidential race.
Bottom line: McCain/Palin’s numbers are overall nowhere as good as Bush’s were (apart from one of Gallup’s poll) and he barely won by 1.5% at the end.
CBS News (931 LV) 9/20 – 9/22 Bush +9
AP/Ipsos (931 LV) 9/20 – 9/22 Bush +7
Pew Research (989 RV) 9/17 – 9/21 Bush +3
NBC News/WSJ (787 LV) 9/17 – 9/19 Bush +4
Zogby (1066 LV) 9/17 – 9/19 Bush +3
IBD/TIPP (650 LV) 9/14 – 9/18 Bush +3
ARG (LV) 9/7 – 9/21 Bush +1
CBS News (1048 RV) 9/12 – 9/16 Bush +9
CNN/USAT/Gallup (767 LV) 9/13 – 9/15 Bush +14
Battleground (1000 LV) 9/12 – 9/15 Bush +4
Pew Research (725 LV) 9/11 – 9/14 Bush +1
Harris (867 LV) 9/9 – 9/13 Kerry +1
Newsweek (1003 RV) 9/9 – 9/10 Bush +6
IBD/TIPP (674 LV) 9/7 – 9/12 TIE
Zogby (1018 LV) 9/8 – 9/9 Bush +4
Time (857 LV) 9/7 – 9/9 52% Bush +11
AP/Ipsos (899 LV) 9/7 – 9/9 Bush +5
FOX/Opin. Dyn. (1000 LV) 9/7 – 9/8 Bush +4
ABC News/Wash Post (LV) 9/6 – 9/8 Bush +9
Pew Research (745 LV) 9/8 – 9/10 Bush +16
CBS News (909 RV) 9/6 – 9/8 Bush +7
CNN/USAT/Gallup (778 LV) 9/3 – 9/5 Bush +7
Newsweek (1,008 RV) 9/2 – 9/3 Bush +11
jim m on September 9, 2008 at 8:13 PM
generating contra-precedentary law from the bench is hardly adhering to its mandate Gucci….
Roe was bad law based on no precedent, deferring to foreign law had no precedent Gucci…..that’s the difference between moonbat law and strict constructionist theory.
sven10077 on September 10, 2008 at 5:28 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3