Obama ad: “No Maverick”
posted at 6:45 pm on September 8, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
I guess Barack Obama doesn’t read Hot Air, nor listens to wisdom from our own Allahpundit. Team O got so flustered by today’s “Original Mavericks” ad that they rushed this new spot out today, apparently before doing some rudimentary fact-checking. Obama argues that the Bridge to Nowhere shows him to be the real Maverick:
It’s true that Palin didn’t start off opposing the bridge, but as Governor she made the decision to kill it. At least she moved in the right direction. Who voted for it in the first place? Not John McCain; he derided it on the Senate floor, despite it being a pet project from a Republican colleague. Two of the votes came from … Barack Obama and Joe Biden:
Though Gov. Palin originally supported the earmark spending on the Ketchikan bridge (“to nowhere), she eventually killed the project, chosing to spend Federal money on other infrasturcture programs.
However, Sen. Biden and Sen. Obama voted for funding the Bridge, even when given a second chance by Sen. Tom Coburn, who proposed shifting earmark funds to Katrina relief.
Let’s take a look at that amendment, too. Coburn, a real anti-pork reformer, tried to cancel earmarks and redirect funds to Hurricane Katrina relief. It gave the Senate a second chance to stop the Bridge to Nowhere and use the funds to help victims of the storm — which Obama likes to use as an example of his leadership. And yet, the supposed “maverick” of this ad and his running mate chose to support the ridiculous $200 million Bridge to Nowhere instead.
The most laughable hypocrisy about this and AP’s earlier post is Obama’s decision to use the Ketchikan bridge to attack Palin. He supported it; he failed to change his mind on it given a second chance; Obama owns that bridge right along with Ted Stevens. Yet he blames Palin for the earmark as if she isn’t as good as a reformer as he is, because she stopped it despite Obama’s best efforts to build the boondoggle.
You can’t make this up.
Hopefully, “Captain Earmark” ($740 million in pork and counting, and with its own shady connections) will continue doing two things all the way to Election Day: keep talking about earmarks and keep attacking Palin. The more he goes after the Republican running mate, the more he equates himself with her and makes McCain look presidential.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
That should be bullet # 1 for Palin in the debates. Prime time most watched Veep debate evah. And then Biden can rebut with his higher IQ speech.
Hog Wild on September 8, 2008 at 9:05 PM
Its becoming fairly obvious why Obama continues to try to diminish Palin and his actions have nothing to do with politics or ideology. Not too long ago Obama was basking in the glow with halos of light dancing around him. Then he made the Ocropolis speech and was on top of the world ready for the big bounce and press adulation for weeks. The along comes Palin and ruins all of that while becoming the new star. Obama’s ego just cannot take the slight so he goes after her foaming at the mouth all the while he leaves McCain alone and his own campaign is suffering.
JonPrichard on September 8, 2008 at 9:16 PM
Epic fail.
McCain needs to remember this one and call His Holiness out during the debates.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on September 8, 2008 at 9:21 PM
“No Maverick”, so what! Mr. BHO, bite me…
foxone on September 8, 2008 at 9:29 PM
Hillary must be having the mother of all schadenfreudes these days.
ex-Democrat on September 8, 2008 at 9:50 PM
O…M…G…
Somebody please, get this to the Mac campaign. This ad would win the election, it’s so catchy and it writes itself.
People all over the country would LOVE this ad.
fossten on September 8, 2008 at 10:01 PM
One other thought – people would be eagerly anticipating the next ad…this could be a clean sweep.
fossten on September 8, 2008 at 10:06 PM
WTF – video no longer available – again? Second HA video in two minutes that I’ve tried to view that ain’t workin’
Ugly on September 8, 2008 at 10:31 PM
My favorite part is that McCain and Palin have been going around saying “Obama has voted for nearly a billion dollars in pork-barrel spending.”
Now, that’s bending the truth a little. One billion is about 35% more than 740 million, but Obama isn’t going to even try to correct that figure because then he has to openly admit that he spent the $740 million. All he can do now is go home and pout…
I love it!!!
Glenn Jericho on September 8, 2008 at 11:38 PM
Hillary must be having the mother of all schadenfreudes these days.
ex-Democrat on September 8, 2008 at 9:50 PM
Oh yes, did you see how half-heartedly she stumped today? She’s got to be loving this!
Moxie on September 9, 2008 at 12:09 AM
In my adult lifetime I don’t remember a presidential candidate EVER going after a vice-presidential candidate. This is ridiculous. He is such a metrosexual wussy boy it’s embarrassing for the Dhimmicrats.
Mojave Mark on September 9, 2008 at 12:56 AM
Today we salute YOU, Mr. 1 billion in earmarks community organizer guy…
Damiano on September 8, 2008 at 7:00 PM
O…M…G…
Somebody please, get this to the Mac campaign. This ad would win the election, it’s so catchy and it writes itself.
People all over the country would LOVE this ad.
fossten on September 8, 2008 at
Brilliant, Damiano and fossten. I don’t know if you could get those two voice-over guys to do it, but it would be a hoot and would probably have Zerobama shooting arugula through his nose (if the coke hasn’t collapsed his nasal passages).
SKYFOX on September 9, 2008 at 5:04 AM
Sen. Obama is no Mr. Squeaky Clean on either earmarks or taking PAC money. In fact in many of his early campaigns he was a PAC Man, even running one campaign virtually on PAC donations.
So, please, Sen. Obama, tell us who is the man who came to light due to PAC and special interest spending and then using federal money to reward supporters. I suggest you hold up a mirror for that answer.
ajacksonian on September 9, 2008 at 8:47 AM
How do they get away with this?!
chiefeditor on September 9, 2008 at 4:16 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2