Video: When did Obama fight his own party?
posted at 11:12 am on September 7, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Chris Wallace puts David Axelrod on the hot seat this morning on Fox News to ask Barack Obama’s chief strategist to provide evidence of Obama’s post-partisanship. Axelrod sputters about a few co-sponsored bills that passed by unanimous consent, but fails to come up with any evidence at all. Instead, he comes up with a strange new smear about Sarah Palin:
Fox News’ Chris Wallace: Now, David, McCain and Palin do have records of going up against their own parties. When has Barack Obama ever gone up against the Democratic Party in the U.S. Senate?
Obama Senior Strategist David Axelrod: Well, first of all, I want to say this, Chris. Senator McCain on the biggest decision that he’ll ever make, uh, in public life, which is the choice of a vice-presidential nominee, decided not to go up against his own party and was told he couldn’t pick the person he thought was the best choice, amd he went with Governor Palin instead. So I think that’s important to know.
Wallace: Well, OK, but —
Axelrod: One of the first things that Senator Obama did when he came to the U.S. Senate was push for the most far-reaching ethics reforms that we’ve seen since Watergate. That didn’t please people on either side of the aisle, and he has done that consistently in his career. He’s reached across party lines to find consensus and he’s taken on his own party on issues like, like ethics reform. You know, what was interesting about these attacks about bipartisanship and so on is that people like Dick Lugar, the very respected Republican senator from Indiana, spoke out and said, These are just partisan attacks. I’ve worked with Barack Obama.’ They worked together on arms control. Senator Coburn in Oklahoma worked together with him on budget issues, like putting the budget on Google so we can see how our money is being spent, putting caps on the contracts around Katrina rebuilding. Senator Obama has a strong record of working across party lines to produce progress for people.
Wallace: But David, because you guys always talk about ethics legislation and the nuclear non-proliferation deal with Dick Lugar, I went back and looked — both of those measures passed by unanimous consent. They were so accepted by the Senate that there was not even a vote. In fact, ethics legislation was one of the campaign promises. These were not — if I may, if I may. These were not areas where Barack Obama went up against the leadership of his own party nearly in the way that John McCain did on campaign finance reform, on limiting interrogation of terror detainees, on immigration reform. He did not go up against his own party on either of those issues.
Axelrod refers to the idea that McCain wanted to pick Joe Lieberman as his running mate, but was too afraid to do so. That assumes two facts not in evidence at all — that Palin was a safe pick, and a darling of the party. I doubt seriously that McCain took very much advice from the RNC on any aspect of his campaign, let alone allow them to dictate his running mate. Palin has endeared herself to the party in Alaska in the same way McCain has endeared himself to it nationally. It’s an absurd statement and shows how desperate Axelrod has become.
As I mentioned earlier, this has to be a major attack line for Team McCain. Only one ticket in this race has a record of independent thought and action. Obama/Biden are machine politicians, never rocking the Democratic boat. Both McCain and Palin have actual experience doing what Obama only talks about. When pressed on this point, the only defense Team Obama has are a few co-sponsorships that didn’t even warrant a roll-call vote. Obama has never risked his standing in the party to champion any sort of reform or any kind of legislation at all.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Hillary “Party of one”
I guess Barry O can claim he stood up to his party when they wanted to fight on in Iraq and he was ready to surrender without conditions.
William Amos on September 7, 2008 at 11:17 AM
He’s all talk. He’s the furthest left member in the senate, so I have no idea how that is gonna win over conservatives.
lodge on September 7, 2008 at 11:19 AM
SLAP…SLAP…SLAP…SLAP…SLAP…!
Over.
1GooDDaDDy on September 7, 2008 at 11:20 AM
Sorry, Mr. Axelrod, sponsoring the “Save the Puppy Dog Act” is not challenging your base and reaching out to the other side.
It’s just not.
What did Obama do while working inside the Chicago political machine to clean up that corrupt system?
Well?
SteveMG on September 7, 2008 at 11:21 AM
Squealing pigs. If they weren’t worried about Palin, they would not be smearing and yelling. Looking for a Palin-Mania meter? Listen to the marxists squeal.
saved on September 7, 2008 at 11:21 AM
They are delusional at this point, so much so that I actually LOLd when I saw that Barry O said he could take Palin in a basketball game. As if.
bbz123 on September 7, 2008 at 11:22 AM
Help me understand… Doesn’t UNANIMOUS consent mean EVERYONE agrees? This doesn’t sound like BIG reform.
Getting the corrupt leaders of your own party KICKED OUT, sounds like reform.
Has OBama had dinner with Rostenkowsky?
Voting with the DEMS 97% of the time is NOT rocking the boat. He obviously stands with HARRY REID.
originalpechanga on September 7, 2008 at 11:22 AM
Of course Osama Obama has reached out across party lines!
He’s reached out to the communist party, the bomb-throwing party, the convicted-felon party, the race-hatred party, the destroy-America party of radical nations, and on and on.
And he’s done it so many times.
MrScribbler on September 7, 2008 at 11:23 AM
What Obama has not done is expend any political capital on anything other than himself. That’s the line of attack the R’s should use.
BJ* on September 7, 2008 at 11:23 AM
And WHERE does this meme of Joe Lieberman come to play?
McCain COULD NOT pick Joe. He stands with Harry Reid on most everything….
originalpechanga on September 7, 2008 at 11:23 AM
Ya know, from the get-go I’ve always thought Biden wasn’t Obama’s first choice. The timeline just didn’t fit. But as usual the MSM never batted an eyelash.
BTW – did anybody catch Obama during his ABC interview this morning? When asked about the he’s a muslim smears, Barack responded, “John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.”
George Stephanopoulos was quick to correct Obama only seconds later – “Christian faith” :D
dugan on September 7, 2008 at 11:24 AM
Sound of crickets chirping.
TooTall on September 7, 2008 at 11:24 AM
I think its funny alos that Barry is spening more time talking about Sarah than he is talking about McCain.
William Amos on September 7, 2008 at 11:24 AM
It’s rather amazing that we can wake up and find the GOP as the real party of “Change” while the Dems are the obvious guys in the “smoke filled room”.
As a Bush fan I’m not enamored with the idea of “Change”; but Let’s Just Win, Baby!
Shivas Irons on September 7, 2008 at 11:24 AM
Barack Obama, the NO RISK candidate, errr..make that the TAKES NO RISK candidate.
originalpechanga on September 7, 2008 at 11:24 AM
More strong evidence that McC’s pick , who ever decided upon her, was a STROKE of genius. Multiple small flanking attacks opened up on Obama … and BO has no answer.
Benjamin9 on September 7, 2008 at 11:24 AM
Who said that? Waiting……..
vcferlita on September 7, 2008 at 11:25 AM
“Well let me tell you about McCain…”
Wallace should have shut him up right there and made him answer. Axelrod bloviates about nothing almost as well as Biden, he said basically nothing for two minutes.
Bishop on September 7, 2008 at 11:25 AM
Barry is a go-along-get-along Cook County pol even if means hanging with Weathermen and beserk pasters.
Why doesn’t Axelrod get the hatred that Rove got?
If guess because Axel is not that good.
RobCon on September 7, 2008 at 11:25 AM
Axelrod is so GROSS !
stenwin77 on September 7, 2008 at 11:27 AM
He’s reached out to the communist party, the bomb-throwing party, the convicted-felon party, the race-hatred party, the destroy-America party of radical nations, and on and on.
Ahem…these are all constituencies of the larger DFL, so still no reaching by Baracky.
Bishop on September 7, 2008 at 11:28 AM
Good job, Chris.
Spirit of 1776 on September 7, 2008 at 11:31 AM
As far as I’m aware this is the first time the MSM has actually stood straight up and used facts to not only go after Barack’s record, but actually CALLED his spokesman on his obvious attempt to WEASEL out of the question but using a “DISTRACTION”.
I simply MUST have a copy of this video for my Ipod!
Anyone know where I could download a copy? AP, can you make it available?
I wish our MSM would be this straighforward about EVERY SINGLE SUBJECT with every candidate/politician they speak with!
KMC1 on September 7, 2008 at 11:31 AM
And the continual listing of his work with Coburn on the transparency act is a bit disingenuous, too. That’s been Coburn’s puppy for years. He, in an act of graciousness (which was waaaaaay more non-partisan than anything Obama’s done), offered to have Obama co-sponsor it in a friendly attempt to get Obama some props.
But Coburn did all the heavy lifting on that bill. He’s been beating the fiscal accountability drum for years, and anyone with any knowledge understands this. he deserves the credit, not Obama.
nukemhill on September 7, 2008 at 11:31 AM
I just don’t get how Obama’s campaign can be so incompetent. Not only do they keep focusing on Sarah Palin but they keep pushing lines of attack that will hurt Obama more than they will hurt McCain/Palin.
Even when they point out Obama’s accomplishments it seems prone to backfire, either showing McCain/Palin as being stronger (as in this case) or not really being an accomplishment at all (community organizer?).
Kronos on September 7, 2008 at 11:32 AM
It really seemed like a huge waste of time to bring him on the show at all. I watched the first question where Wallace asked him about Palin, and he refused to answer the question, and just repeated the democrat talking points. I really didn’t want to waste any more of my morning waiting for this puppet to honestly answer any questions.
I guess the only saving grace that Axelrod and some other democrats have is that they had the balls to come on the hated Fox News while Obama has avoided them like the plague.
wise_man on September 7, 2008 at 11:32 AM
What Axelrod means is that McCain didn’t choose one of the candidates that the dems thought he’d choose; thereby leaving them flat footed and showing themselves as the party of children they are.
bloghooligan on September 7, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Answer:NEV-UH !!!
Obama has been more interested in aligning himself with criminals, malcontents, terrorists, traitors, and all flavor of malcontents.
Far from “Bucking his Own Party, has instead been the master of Go along-Get along politics; the method taught at the school of Chicago machine politics…
This is yet another pack of lies being peddled by
Herr GoebblesDavid Axelrod and the Obama campaign…RocketmanBob on September 7, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Did state Senator Obama not see any need for reform in Il?
clghitis on September 7, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Whereas Governor Palin fought and defeated the corruption in her own party to get to where she is today, Senator Obama further his political career by embracing the corruption that is the Chicago political machine.
Palin smashed the corruption in the Alaska GOP with a closed fist. Obama embraced the corruption of Chicago democrats with open arms.
Case closed, as far as I’m concerned.
Bruce in NH on September 7, 2008 at 11:34 AM
I betcha Axelrod and the boy’s are having SERIOUS second thoughts on the Messiah now.
BallisticBob on September 7, 2008 at 11:34 AM
Does Axelrod really think we will buy that the VP choice came from GOP HQ?? I recall a lot of consternation a week ago about Gov. Palin’s selection upsetting entrenched Republican interests.
Peri Winkle on September 7, 2008 at 11:34 AM
Ahh….so they’re thinking that since they made their biggest decision ever on Biden, it’s all downhill now for Barrack?
He’s just bent because he knows it was a brilliant choice.
Patrick S on September 7, 2008 at 11:34 AM
It’s the accomplishments, stupid.
SteveMG on September 7, 2008 at 11:34 AM
They are delusional at this point, so much so that I actually LOLd when I saw that Barry O said he could take Palin in a basketball game. As if.
bbz123 on September 7, 2008 at 11:22 AM
The Bobby Riggs presidency???
DfDeportation on September 7, 2008 at 11:35 AM
The Dems won’t ever win the presidency again if they don’t reject the far Left wing of the party they’ve allowed to dictate who the nominee will be.
DerKrieger on September 7, 2008 at 11:36 AM
And the funny thing about Barry voting 97% party line???
The 3% he didn’t vote party line was because they were not far enough to the LEFT.
Romeo13 on September 7, 2008 at 11:36 AM
Another aside: Axelrod just looks the part of the greasy, slimy, used car selling, back-room dealing kinda guy.
And no I’m not inferring/implying anything from this – but Axelrod also looks a bit like Hitler.
dugan on September 7, 2008 at 11:36 AM
As long as Axelrod is such proponent of mindreading, I contend that Obama couldn’t pick his first choice either–Cornel West.
RBMN on September 7, 2008 at 11:37 AM
Beat me to it. To Obama’s credit, he was against the war that his party readily funded. Now, he didn’t actually to vote on it or anything — but technically he was against the war and the surge that worked.
LastRick on September 7, 2008 at 11:38 AM
SHAMELESS “Look you in the eye and lie” LIARS
marklmail on September 7, 2008 at 11:38 AM
As for Obama bucking his own party, why would he? He doesn’t have any positions that are out of step with the liberal Democrat orthodoxy. This is, of course, why he won the nomination. He’s true to the brand and if the Democrats are so convinced that their ideas are the right ones for the country then he shouldn’t try to justify his lack of reaching out to the other side or going against the party leadership. He should consider it a plus.
Bennett on September 7, 2008 at 11:39 AM
David Axelrod is the epitome of the typical Chicago Democratic Machine Politician, so whenever you hear anything, and I mean anything come out of his mouth short of a belch, I would take it with a grain of salt. Come to think of it, I would question the belch as well.
pilamaye on September 7, 2008 at 11:39 AM
I saw this on the TV and I wanted to slap Axelrod on the face.
This guy is a detestable flake.
jencab on September 7, 2008 at 11:40 AM
I would love to see every Republican challenge any reporter who brings up the “experience” question about Palin just as Newt did: “Name me one piece of legislation that Obama has ever written in his entire career.”
Follow up with “How does a person with a 97% liberal voting record claim to be bi-partison?”.
There is no better sight than a reporter gagging on his own liberalism.
chromium on September 7, 2008 at 11:40 AM
I am EXTREMELY happy with both candidate’s choices for Vice President. Unfortunately for Sen. Obama, I am happy for all the wrong reasons. Joe Biden is a lovely man but holy cow he’s a nut. At the risk of being mean he has a lot more in common with the perceived similarities of Eagleton than Gov. Palin.
Cindy Munford on September 7, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Godwin’s Law strikes again. Thanks a lot.
ManlyRash on September 7, 2008 at 11:45 AM
Axelrod: creepy tool of the DNC.
He looks like an English zombie-fop with his eyes half-closed.
Christine on September 7, 2008 at 11:45 AM
If he thinks Joe should have been selected for VP, why didn’t he pick Joe?
flyoverland on September 7, 2008 at 11:46 AM
Ah yes, Hitler comes to mind as well. It’s the ’stache and the hairdo(n’t).
Christine on September 7, 2008 at 11:46 AM
Sarah Palin is back to running 3 miles per day after having Trig earlier this year. In contrast, Obama has taken up smoking cigarettes again.
With basketball moves that led her high school team to a state championship, at 5′ 5″ Sarah would stomp is worthless 6′ 1″ butt on a basketball court.
Given the current media circus, accepting a basketball challenge could not hurt Sarah. If Obama backs down from townhall debate challenges AND playing basketball with a woman, his WIMP factor will go off the charts.
Right_of_Attila on September 7, 2008 at 11:54 AM
Didn’t Axelrod say later that many of the Democrats were secretly against the campaign finance reform? That would make a great ad.
aikidoka on September 7, 2008 at 11:55 AM
There is a distinction between the GOP establishment and the “base” of the Republican party that I don’t think the Democrats understand. The base is thrilled with Palin; the establishment–not so much.
Count to 10 on September 7, 2008 at 11:57 AM
Yeah, the choice of Biden is comical. He’s out there telling people that he picked someone who is ready to lead the nation in his stead (unlike McCain/Palin.) But how many times has Biden announced his own candidacy for Presidency? And how many Democrats believed it then?
Nice work, n00b.
fretless on September 7, 2008 at 11:57 AM
The article at Weekly Standard completely refutes the claim that McCain wanted Lieberman and had to be talked out of it. He wanted Palin and they tried to talk him out of it.
I have a fantasy about McCain being asked about his VP pick right out of the chite in the first debate, and before answering the question McCain demands that they ask the same question of Obama, why he rejected and did not even vet the person who won 18 million votes and had a devoted following in the party going back over 20 years. This argument too can be turned right back on Obama.
Axelrod is soooo screwed. Barack Obama’s giant ego and hatred of women prevented him from winning this election by taking Hillary Clinton as his running mate. Now he is not a change agent, he is not a post-partisan independent thinker, and he is not making good decisions when confronted with unexpected situations.
rockmom on September 7, 2008 at 12:02 PM
What was the smear? That Palin wasn’t the first choice?
They are really getting desperate, aren’t they…
Of course, McLame probably wanted to pick Kennedy ;)
I betcha Biden wasn’t Obamas first choice either.
Any speculation on who he really wanted to pick?
Timothy S. Carlson on September 7, 2008 at 12:05 PM
I’ve often wondered how tall she is. Is this stat confirmed?
ManlyRash on September 7, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Ed is correct, and McCain-Palin need to rip the hide of Obama for this. Frankly, all they need to do is go chapter by chapter through David Freddoso’s The Case Against Barack Obama and develop a separate set of attacks for each chapter. It’s about time Americans got to know the real Obama rather than the version that’s being marketed. Freddoso covers Capitol Hill for National Review Online. Of course, McCain-Palin should then recount their own real reform records.
BTW: There’s a reason that Axelrod is rarely used as a spokesman unless he’s on MSNBC, where they allow him to speak without challenge. I saw this exchange with Wallace, and Axelrod looked awful. Gibbs must have been taking the day off after doing so many appearances since Wednesday, trying to put some positive spin on Obama’s message. But tell me, would you ever take Gibbs seriously after he manipulated a planeload of media into taking off in a plane headed for Chicago before telling them that Obama remained behind in DC to meet with Hillary and Pelosi? I’ll never forget his excuse to those on the plane (paraphrased): “Well, we never intentionally meant to deceive you.”
BuckeyeSam on September 7, 2008 at 12:07 PM
I saw this. It irritates me that they keep saying “no one’s ever heard of her”. That’s simply not true, if you follow politics at all. Obama said that no one anticipated the success of the surge and Axelrod says “if you talk to anyone in the military, I think they would say that too”. Who has said that in the military? General Clark?
Moxie on September 7, 2008 at 12:08 PM
Axelrod’s claim that Palin was the pick of the GOP machinery is such a patent lie! These people cannot keep their stories straight:
Palin is an unqualified backwater hick!
Palin is a cog in the Republican machinery!
McCain shows poor judgement in choosing Palin!
MCCain wasn’t strong enough to choose Lieberman!
Which is it?
The fact is that McCain’s selection of Gov. Palin was the most brilliant act of political ju jitsu in living memory. The dems are so off their game they don’t even have a game. Obama has been reduced to running against McCain’s VP and Biden has been touting his friendship with McCain on campaign stops – pure McGenius.
muggedbyreality on September 7, 2008 at 12:08 PM
BuckeyeSam on September 7, 2008 at 12:07 PM
Gibbs is on CNN right now.
Moxie on September 7, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Each of these new attacks on Palin gives the McCain team just one more grenade to toss back in the O!’s lap. It’s gonna be hysterical. More popcorn, please.
JimK on September 7, 2008 at 12:10 PM
That’s it in a nutshell …
fretless — I assume Lieberman was busy when Obama was selecting Biden. I wonder how Biden being “in the pocket of corporate lobbyists” is going to play with Obama’s case. And note that most of those lobbyists are bank industry related.
Right now, I don’t think that team Obama knows it has made a VP choice.
tarpon on September 7, 2008 at 12:13 PM
The Obamassiah is so much for change in Washington that he chose for his running mate someone who’s been in the Senate since Gerald Ford was president. What, did Robert Byrd turn him down?
rbj on September 7, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Heh! +1
Neocon Peg on September 7, 2008 at 12:20 PM
BuckeyeSam on September 7, 2008 at 12:07 PM
Was Algore alerted to the jetting joyride? Wasted fuel, wasted flags, this guy has money to burn. Please let’s put him in charge.
Cindy Munford on September 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Wallace just keeps talking about facts. When it comes to the Dhimmicrats, facts are something to run from.
Mojave Mark on September 7, 2008 at 12:28 PM
Axelrod is full of it. I have never gotten the impression that McCain did not want Palin. In fact when he walked out on the stage at the convention after her speech..he was beaming. He said Well did we make the right choice?
In fact if he had picked Romney I think the case might have been made that McCain bowed to pressure, but Palin had to prove herself. It was by no means a safe or easy pick.
Terrye on September 7, 2008 at 12:32 PM
He was so laughably silly in his responses that I just went and got my morning coffee. There was absolutely no point in listening to his dribble.
They are running on fumes at Camp Berry.
(spelling changed to reflect appropriate degree of fruitiness)
TheCulturalist on September 7, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Greased weasel, comes to mind!
freeus on September 7, 2008 at 12:48 PM
Axelrod just LOOKS like a weenie. And he is.
SouthernGent on September 7, 2008 at 12:55 PM
Wallace staggers him with a right jab to the chin.
whitetop on September 7, 2008 at 1:02 PM
Arms control!
OMG.. Obama gonna steal GUNS!
Chakra Hammer on September 7, 2008 at 1:02 PM
Luger “respected Republican”?
Was he even at the Republican convention? I didn’t see him..
Chakra Hammer on September 7, 2008 at 1:03 PM
Fact: Obama voted with his 9% approval rating party 97% of the time over his entire Congressional career. McCain voted with Bush from 77% in 2005 to a high of 95% in 2007. All votes in the past 8 years have been lower than 90%.
For this argument to be credible, you would have to prove that Bush was wrong more than 90% of the time.
Damiano on September 7, 2008 at 1:08 PM
Tim Kaine was going to be his pick. But then Russia invaded Georgia and Obama f-ed up his response, and the Democratic elders demanded that he pick somebody with foreign policy chops who could speak intelligently if there were another world crisis before Election Day.
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it. Republicans should follow this meme and start spreading this story about Kaine. Obama was perfectly ready to pick someone whose resume was just as short as Sarah Palin’s.
rockmom on September 7, 2008 at 1:08 PM
No. 1 Strategy for the Obama campaign and chief strategist, Piston-rod Axel-grease:
Make stuff up.
whitetop on September 7, 2008 at 1:10 PM
It’s annoying to watch Axelrod make assertions about McCain’s desires.
How does Axelrod KNOW that McCain wanted Joe Liberman before any other candidate? Sure Joe was in the short list, but now that McCain’s actual pick is destroying Obama–and doing it with a sweet smile? Uh oh! Better start the spin Axelrod!
Axelrod is trying to suggest that Rush Limbaugh is running McCain’s campaign. The McCain/Palin ticket’s overt and proud pro-life position scares the secular-religious-figure out of these people.
Sorry punk, seems McCain is running a smart campaign at this stage and you’re in deep doo.
Montana on September 7, 2008 at 1:17 PM
Take a picture of that clip because it’s doubtful Axlerod will be coming back into that arena again anytime soon.
And Chris Wallace going back and checking facts…. reporters still do that? Cool.
Hog Wild on September 7, 2008 at 1:27 PM
I think this line of attack against Obama will be a pretty good one. It’s a completely hollow argumant on Obama’s part that he is either bipartisan or postpartisan. There is NO evidence of this. Combine this argument with actual evidence of his being a radical and you have a candidate the majority of Americans wiull not want to get behind.
davenp35 on September 7, 2008 at 1:29 PM
As condescending as Barry’s answer to the basketball question was….I understand she played some High School ball…..which is also what he’s done, better yet was when he said he wouldn’t go target shooting with her because she might have an advantage.
Might? I bet Obambi doesn’t even know which is the business end.
RW_theoriginal on September 7, 2008 at 1:36 PM
Barry is cornered, if he had to go against his own party leadership for ethics reform according to Nimrod what does that say about his party?
sven10077 on September 7, 2008 at 1:41 PM
Another Obama camp projection. Obama was told — by Michele — that he couldn’t pick the person that (his campaign) thought was the best choice, so he picked a loser and now they’re desparate.
I’m beginning to look at most of these Palin smears as projections — illegitimacy, corruption, drugs, irresponsibility, racism — and if you consider Obama’s fuzzy life story and associations, it begins to makes sense.
Nichevo on September 7, 2008 at 1:53 PM
Did anybody else see Biden use the “Above my pay grade” response to Brokaw this morning. I’m sure he thought he was being funny but I bet the campaign slapped hin good for reminding everybody about one of the worst responses ever.
That would make a great campaign ad – Biden and Obama both using the “Above my pay grade” response, tying it to Obama’s 130-some present votes in the Illinois state senate.
PatMac on September 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM
Fixed it for you.
platypus on September 7, 2008 at 3:08 PM
And Axelrod knows McCain wanted to pick some one else how? I’m looking forward to see that proof, but I’m not holding my breath for the media to press him on the issue. Same old same old.
oakpack on September 7, 2008 at 3:25 PM
Captain Ed:
Why, oh why doesn’t Chris Wallace or anyone else make the point that the ethics reform Obama voted for was JOHN MCCAIN’s bill? You know, the one where Barack backed out of McCain’s bi-partisan working group because the Democrats wanted to push a bill of their own? Hello?
Ethics “reform” in Chicago is what made it possible for Emil Jones (and all the other “borrowers”) to transfer $500,000 from his campaign treasure chest into his personal account before the new constraints kicked in.
JM Hanes on September 7, 2008 at 3:27 PM
You know, uh, uh, uh, what is interesting about these attacks…is uh, uh, that Sen. Obama, uh ,uh, has always been ready to work uh, with, uh, and uh, because he uh, uh…
revolution on September 7, 2008 at 4:01 PM
The question I want to ask is when the Media puts themselves on the hot seat? Their behavior during both conventions was intolerable and the public agrees based on the reactions in Wis yesterday.
Dr. Dog on September 7, 2008 at 4:02 PM
Ethics reform?
Give me a break. In the race to get superdelegates, Obama was buying them left and right. http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/02/15/buying-superdelegates/ He was also making large contributions to the respective state Democratic parties during the primary.
It may have been legal, but it is far from ethical.
I suppose that’s Obama’s way of rolling out “Etihcs Reform You Can Believe In.”
Jim M. on September 7, 2008 at 4:27 PM
OMFG, A member of the MSM did RESEARCH and used it to question a DEMOCRAT?
I think I may faint! Smelling salts! SMELLING SALTS!
Merovign on September 7, 2008 at 4:37 PM
Who does Axelrod remind you of ? I keep looking at him and he has an erie resemblance to someone.
jamc1316 on September 7, 2008 at 5:05 PM
This weasel filibustered the entire interview. I normally find Wallace’s interviews excellent, but he did not hold Axelrod’s feet to the fire this time.
The reform for which Obama takes credit is crap. Forbids accepting lunch unless you are campaigning, and does not prohibit accepting flights from lobbyists.
Of course it passed by unanimous consent.
RogerOnTheRight on September 7, 2008 at 5:39 PM
He did, however, voted Present.
Kini on September 7, 2008 at 5:40 PM
Axlerod also tried the old smear about McCains campaign being run by lobbyists. But Axelrod has some splainin to do about the other company run out of the same office here in Chicago that stages fake grass roots campaigns for his corporate clients.
JAW on September 7, 2008 at 5:48 PM
The fact McCain picked Palin justs ticks Axelrod off..gotta luv it.
malkinmania on September 7, 2008 at 6:11 PM
Axelrod is central casting Greyhound bus terminal creepy sleaze.
Teddy on September 7, 2008 at 6:15 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »