John McCain’s presidential address
posted at 8:02 am on September 5, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Yesterday, I wrote that John McCain had to give a substantially different speech than Sarah Palin did in her debut on the national stage. She needed to show that she could fight back against an onslaught of despicable smears and innuendo coming from the media without playing the victim or getting defensive. McCain needed to sound presidential. Palin needed to introduce herself to the nation; McCain needed to remind people who they already know him to be.
McCain accomplished this in a speech that took a little while to find its heart. Instead of a partisan attack on Barack Obama, McCain aimed a little higher. He sounded a message of reform that reached out to people across the political spectrum, and he challenged everyone — but specifically Republicans — to reform government and the way they do business in politics.
That’s not to say that he didn’t draw distinctions between himself and Obama, but he did so without rancor, a quality he attacked with more vigor than his opponent:
I will keep taxes low and cut them where I can. My opponent will raise them. I will open new markets to our goods and services. My opponent will close them. I will cut government spending. He will increase it.
My tax cuts will create jobs. His tax increases will eliminate them. My health care plan will make it easier for more Americans to find and keep good health care insurance. His plan will force small businesses to cut jobs, reduce wages, and force families into a government run health care system where a bureaucrat stands between you and your doctor. …
Senator Obama wants our schools to answer to unions and entrenched bureaucracies. I want schools to answer to parents and students.
Other than that, McCain didn’t focus on opposition talk at all during his speech. Instead, he focused on his own policies and put forward a positive, detailed vision of a McCain administration, based on one guiding principle: reform. That concept got applied not just to Washington, but also to education, where McCain made a surprising commitment to school choice, one not heard from his campaign for most of this cycle.
The new Republican leader did one critical thing in this speech to the national audience, too. He acknowledged the Republican failures during their control of Congress to act as a reform party. McCain used the moment to challenge his party to reclaim the mantle of reform as an act of penance for the past:
I fight to restore the pride and principles of our party. We were elected to change Washington, and we let Washington change us. We lost the trust of the American people when some Republicans gave in to the temptations of corruption. We lost their trust when rather than reform government, both parties made it bigger. We lost their trust when instead of freeing ourselves from a dangerous dependence on foreign oil, both parties and Senator Obama passed another corporate welfare bill for oil companies. We lost their trust, when we valued our power over our principles.
We’re going to change that. We’re going to recover the people’s trust by standing up again for the values Americans admire. The party of Lincoln, Roosevelt and Reagan is going to get back to basics.
This, I think, was absolutely critical to establish credibility. Yesterday, I asked Mitch McConnell about whether the party would accept the challenge of becoming a true reform agent, and he replied that Republicans had always been the party of reform. I understood what he meant, but the answer didn’t acknowledge the GOP lapse when they held power for more than a few years, post-Contract with America. McCain got to the heart of voter skepticism of the Republican brand better than anyone else at this convention, and voters needed that high-level apology for the sins of the past before they could begin to reconsider giving trust again to the GOP.
McCain used this to explain his choice of running mate. Leaving the contrast of Barack Obama’s choice of running mate to the viewer, McCain told America that he needed someone outside the system with a proven record of going after corruption at the risk of party and career to help him accomplish his mission. He also needed someone who didn’t have the stench of the previous Republican failure attached to her for America to trust his desire to accomplish real reform. No other potential candidate has that kind of credibility on reform, and Sarah Palin is McCain’s way of showing American voters he means business.
Most of this, though, didn’t necessarily make an emotional impact. McCain left that to the end, when he drew another implicit but strong contrast between himself and Obama. He told the story of his POW years, not to claim some special status but to explain how the experience humbled and matured him into abandoning his selfishness. Palin talked about a “servant’s heart,” but McCain gave that an emotional timbre that underscored his desire to serve his country rather than any other interest:
I fell in love with my country when I was a prisoner in someone else’s. I loved it not just for the many comforts of life here. I loved it for its decency; for its faith in the wisdom, justice and goodness of its people. I loved it because it was not just a place, but an idea, a cause worth fighting for. I was never the same again. I wasn’t my own man anymore. I was my country’s.
I’m not running for president because I think I’m blessed with such personal greatness that history has anointed me to save our country in its hour of need. My country saved me. My country saved me, and I cannot forget it. And I will fight for her for as long as I draw breath, so help me God.
He then gave a stirring call to service that transformed a quiet, workmanlike speech into something more inspiring, and recalled a spirit that had not yet been seen in this campaign:
I’m going to fight for my cause every day as your President. I’m going to fight to make sure every American has every reason to thank God, as I thank Him: that I’m an American, a proud citizen of the greatest country on earth, and with hard work, strong faith and a little courage, great things are always within our reach. Fight with me. Fight with me.
Fight for what’s right for our country.
Fight for the ideals and character of a free people.
Fight for our children’s future.
Fight for justice and opportunity for all.
Stand up to defend our country from its enemies.
Stand up for each other; for beautiful, blessed, bountiful America.
Stand up, stand up, stand up and fight. Nothing is inevitable here. We’re Americans, and we never give up. We never quit. We never hide from history. We make history.
Thank you, and God Bless you.
The final third of this speech made it memorable, and challenged us — all of us, not just Republicans — to do better, be better, and serve something greater than our own desires. McCain exhorted us to never give up, just as he never gave up, not last summer when his campaign collapsed, not after the 2000 campaign, and not after he broke from the torture of his enemies in a POW camp. Keep fighting for what’s right.
In a word, McCain was presidential. And that’s what the American people needed to see from its candidate.
All in all, I’d call this a very good moment for John McCain. He stuck to his guns, he didn’t make promises he couldn’t keep, and he stayed true to his own vision of America and the policies that come from that vision. While his speech didn’t have the fire and the surprise of Palin’s, it didn’t have to after her triumph on Wednesday.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
No problem…what is happening?
right2bright on September 5, 2008 at 9:16 AM
Not at all, Sh!tley. It was a splendid moment – one that the community organizer will never have for the rest of this campaign. Suck on it.
ManlyRash on September 5, 2008 at 9:17 AM
Among too many things, I’d argue that McCain needs to develop an easy, graphic way to demonstrate the differences between him and Obama on energy, taxes, and other economic issues that poll as significant.
On energy, just create a chart and work from there. It seems to me that McCain can blow Obama away here.
On taxes, McCain needs to provide some straight talk to voters because Obama isn’t.
First, he needs to explain how having large corporations pay a top tax rate of 35% prompts multinational companies to send operations overseas. And needs to emphasize that his reduction of the tax rate to 25% applies to all large corporations, not just oil companies.
Second, on individual taxes, he needs to explain that Obama’s tax break for 95% of the people is nothing more than a complicated welfare shell game. He’ll raise income and payroll taxes for the wealthy in order to redistribute money in the form of complicated refundable tax credits to others. The Wall Street Journal reported this week that Obama’s tax plan will increase the number of households that aren’t paying income tax from 38% to (I think) nearly 50%. Think about that.
Just as important, McCain needs to tie the redistribution-of-wealth aspects of Obama’s tax plan to Obama’s proposed increases in federal spending. Then, McCain needs to get some economists to show how Obama will invariably have to raise taxes to sustain his spending programs.
We’ll see.
BuckeyeSam on September 5, 2008 at 9:17 AM
On Wednesday, Governor Palin said that John McCain is the only person who’s REALLY fought for you, when the stakes were life and death. Last night, he explained that he fell in love with his country when he was a prisoner in someone else’s. The sincere devotion he has for America clear. I have found that success or failure always begins as an “inside job”.
Moxie on September 5, 2008 at 9:17 AM
Damn skippy. McCain just did a bit of political jujitsu. Ever heard that phrase before? The campaign that does that successfully usually wins.
rockmom on September 5, 2008 at 9:17 AM
What has Obama ever changed?
Did he fight the corruption in Chicago or Detroit, or was he part of it?
MarkTheGreat on September 5, 2008 at 9:18 AM
His positions almost daily.
carbon_footprint on September 5, 2008 at 9:18 AM
McCain an agent for change? Give me a break. What has he done all these years.
He ought to be looking forward to spending time with Sarah Palin’s husband, though. They can both talk about how they’ve been castrated by their wives.
jim m on September 5, 2008 at 9:19 AM
McCain an agent for change? Give me a break. What has he done all these years.
He ought to be looking forward to spending time with Sarah Palin’s husband, though. They can both talk about how they’ve been castrated by their wives.
jim m on September 5, 2008 at 9:20 AM
The last moments…
carbon_footprint on Sept 5,2008 at 9:08AM.
carbon_footprint:What McCain had last night was emotion,
passion,and very confident!
To be frank,In McCain past speech’s,he just
looked uncomfotable,and ridged!
Last night,he was relaxed,and in charge!
canopfor on September 5, 2008 at 9:20 AM
McCain an agent for change? Give me a break. What has he done all these years.
He ought to be looking forward to spending time with Sarah Palin’s husband, though. They can both talk about how they’ve been castrated by their wives.
jim m on September 5, 2008 at 9:20 AM
The last moments…
carbon_footprint on Sept 5,2008 at 9:08AM.
carbon_footprint:What McCain had last night was emotion,
passion,and very confident!
To be frank,In McCain past speech’s,he just
looked uncomfotable,and ridged!
Last night,he was relaxed,and in charge!
canopfor on September 5, 2008 at 9:20 AM
And you delight in all of this as only a liberal Democrat could. The only time you people feel good about yourselves in when the nation suffers. Sad. Very sad.
ManlyRash on September 5, 2008 at 9:21 AM
So McCain is now marketing himself as an agent for change in D.C? Give me a break. What has he been doing all this time in Washington?
He and Sarah Palin’s husband do have alot in common. They’ve both been castrated by their wives.
jim m on September 5, 2008 at 9:21 AM
LOL, anyone seen the drudge headline? Oprah is blocking Palin coming on the show but her staff disagree.
lodge on September 5, 2008 at 9:21 AM
Three times makes you a troll.
ManlyRash on September 5, 2008 at 9:23 AM
McCain isn’t a speechifier. He is much better in townhall settings where his succinct bluntness is an asset.
What we need in a president — and have sorely missed these past 8 years — is not a smooth orator but a straight talker. Bush seemed to avoid opportunities to communicate his message due to his lack of verbal confidence and the result was a failure of leadership.
McCain has the confidence of powerful convictions tested over a lifetime and no apparent fear of the press. Like his hero Teddy Roosevelt, I would expect him to make full use of the bully pulpit to advance his administration’s objectives.
Terrie on September 5, 2008 at 9:24 AM
Sorry about the repeats. There’s a problem with Word Press.
jim m on September 5, 2008 at 9:24 AM
Do you have a link? I’d like to see that.
Haven’t watched the speech yet, it’s recorded, but I did get a chance to see the Cindy McCain video and speech. The contrast between her and Michelle Obama is quite striking. Cindy has quietly helped people all over the world for decades while Michelle has been whining about how hard her life is.
Maybe if Michelle Obama had spent some time bringing medical aid to desperately needy children in faraway places she’d have a clearer perspective on the cost of her kids’ piano lessons. And perhaps a bit more gratitude towards the “downright mean” country that’s allowed her to suffer from these luxury problems.
Gilda on September 5, 2008 at 9:24 AM
HotAir was against change rhetoric and speeches lacking details before it was for them!
You know, there’s a little thing called “principle.” Here’s the definition:
“a guiding sense of the requirements and obligations of right conduct.”
When HotAir commentators mock Obama for offering change rhetoric without backing it up with details, then cheer McCain for offering change rhetoric without backing it up with details, it shows a glaring lack of principle and shows a dedication to politics.
Tom_Shipley on September 5, 2008 at 9:27 AM
Somewhat O/T:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080904/D93079DG4.html
Dudley Smith on September 5, 2008 at 9:27 AM
And you delight in all…
ManlyRash on sept 5,2008 at 9:21AM.
ManlyRash: Why are Liberals having a can-ip-tion fit over
the unemployment numbers!In Hopey and Changeys
speech ,Hopey says he’s going to create,
One Million jobs,and so if my maths right,the
Liberals will be up by 400,000 jobs,so why are
they whining,they should be Hopin!!!!!!!!!haha:)
canopfor on September 5, 2008 at 9:31 AM
Let’s see what the polls will say Tommy.
BTW, acceptance speeches full of details? Since when, they are acceptance speeches that outline what will be stated in debates and interviews. Where specifics can be addressed.
You little organ grinder monkeys, how early do you get your talking points?
right2bright on September 5, 2008 at 9:32 AM
In those moments of personal pause, I now have two role models to answer my question, “Will I be able to get through this?”
McCain / Palin 2008!!!!
EyesOpen on September 5, 2008 at 9:34 AM
BTW, acceptance speeches full of details? Since when, they are acceptance speeches that outline what will be stated in debates and interviews.
Go back and read the morning after thread on Obama’s speech. Apparently since then.
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/29/the-obama-speech-more-of-the-same-only-less/
Tom_Shipley on September 5, 2008 at 9:36 AM
You hit the nail right on the head, sir.
With the exception of his stance on immigration — which we have fought successfully before, and will fight again if necessary — McCain shows us that “hope” must be worked for and sometimes fought for, not held up as something people can have while sitting on their butts.
I heard a local radio talker this morning babbling about how McCain’s “work in the community” line vindicated Osama Obama for leaving a cushy law gig for “community organizing.” Somehow, I did not get the idea that McCain was suggesting we use the plight of the poor to line our own pockets and build a false image for future political gain.
The fact is, McCain decided he was ready to be president after years of military and government service. The Messiah decided he was ready after days in the Senate.
The choice this year is more important than we think. And while I’m not particularly impressed with McCain’s speechifying skills, his readiness is, to me, beyond question.
MrScribbler on September 5, 2008 at 9:36 AM
My first ever double post,oops.
canopfor on September 5, 2008 at 9:36 AM
And last week it went up by over 300 points. So what?
MarkTheGreat on September 5, 2008 at 9:37 AM
What “changes” will Obama bring about?
All he’s talked about are the same laundry list of worthless, unworkable social programs and socialist schemes Democrats have been proposing for 50 years.
And if he gets them, prepare for the inevitable “this program needs additional funding” every year, as an excuse for its abject failure in doing anything but provide funding to Democrat supporters and unionized government employees.
NoDonkey on September 5, 2008 at 9:38 AM
Good God, flip charts? Lets not go there.
MarkTheGreat on September 5, 2008 at 9:39 AM
Classy. Covered all the bases. Delivered okay, but he seemed to get tripped up from time to time.
I hope he’s in his groove by the time of the debates. We can’t afford Obama making him look like a bumbling fool. Oh, wait there are no teleprompters at the debates so Obama will be the bumbling fool!
“Uh… uh… ummmm… uh….” etc.
Woody on September 5, 2008 at 9:39 AM
Good Lord you are dense…we are Republican supporters, why would we give any credence to liberals?
You see, we know what McCain says is backed up by 20 plus years of record…Obama is a few years, and many of those great stands that he took were “present” not a yes or no.
Tommy, where was the one individual, liberal from the Democratic party, that Obama whistle blew, that Obama called out and had him investigated…or do you believe that Obama only hung out with pure untainted politicians and supporters like Resko or the Detroit mayor.
Otherwords Tommy, McCain and Palin have a track record, the other side doesn’t.
So now, back to the one question: Whom has Obama pointed his finger at in his own party for wrong doing? He was a senator, what Democrat has he taken to task?
right2bright on September 5, 2008 at 9:40 AM
5 kids? Doesn’t sound very castrated to me.
Snowmobile racer? Doesn’t sound very castrated to me.
I believe jim m, like most liberals, can’t handle strong women.
MarkTheGreat on September 5, 2008 at 9:41 AM
Cut it out already, T_S…
You gotta be kiddin’…?
That type of behavior and logic is only required if your bread isn’t buttered on the right side.
J_Gocht on September 5, 2008 at 9:42 AM
Among other things he’s been fighting against earmarks. While Obama has become one of the leading earmarkers in the senate.
MarkTheGreat on September 5, 2008 at 9:43 AM
One of the advantages of going through hell, is that forever after, everything else seems trivial by comparison.
After a Vietnamese torture chamber, facing the public in a townhall meeting is nothing.
MarkTheGreat on September 5, 2008 at 9:45 AM
If only McCain would get off that amnesty crap. He could do a million things right, but amnesty would be such a catistrophic disaster that it would trump any good the man did.
Until he comes clean on amnesty, he will have to get elected without me.
saiga on September 5, 2008 at 9:48 AM
Does that mean he’s gonna have to take Sarah to the woodshed…?
Oh to be a fly on the wall in that shed…!
J_Gocht on September 5, 2008 at 9:49 AM
The last minute of McCain’s speech was just about as memorable and stirring as any I’ve seen in my lifetime. Amid the sustain cheers of the crowd, “STAND UP! STAND UP!” Why is it that true passion seems to go unrecognized these days by the jaded punditry?
max1 on September 5, 2008 at 9:49 AM
Heh…that “shed” will be the Oval Office.
ManlyRash on September 5, 2008 at 9:50 AM
Obama’s wondering what to do with Palin.
Obama’s responses and lack of responses ALL exemplify his lack of ability, not merely lack of experience, to PROPERLY respond to a threat.
What we see is Obama’s DIPLOMACY OR LACK THEREOF!
This Obamatization of an opponent is NOT what will defy an international terrorist attack, or international aggression from Russia, or bombarding business piracy from China, or any difficulty facing America. What Obama had proven is that he will drag America down into the sewer, absolutely demolishing our credibility abroad. Obama is unable to produce his own accomplishment. EVERYONE HATES the loser who attempts to be king of the hill by assassinating all opposition rather than win an election on merit.
Nada Obama, Sayonara!
maverick muse on September 5, 2008 at 9:51 AM
I disagree. They have a dozen childrem between them. As for McCain in Washington, he has taken up some causes alright, and a fair number of them have been very bad. He screwed up campaign reform for sure along with other things.
saiga on September 5, 2008 at 9:53 AM
Here is Obama’s entire list
of his accomplishments,the
list will appear below the
line,every single one!
—————————
0.
canopfor on September 5, 2008 at 9:54 AM
Do you understand the logistical differences between a mayor and a legislator?
Of course not, your trying to score points, not sound logical.
MarkTheGreat on September 5, 2008 at 9:56 AM
Could anyone here explain the motivation or sensation needed for someone to hang out in the locker room of the home team? Is there some psychological impairment that inspires one to walk into a honky tonk filled with cowboys, and dressed like a punk just to get attention? Does it fill some emotional void to climb the fence of the country club to force your ideal of golf on those on the greens?
I’m curious.
carbon_footprint on September 5, 2008 at 9:57 AM
That great balloon drop was the best thing for me.
I know small minds can be influenced by dramatic, superfluous activity.
But that’s just me…
Luved it…!
J_Gocht on September 5, 2008 at 9:58 AM
You are not alone. Many of us felt that passion and it was truly a great moment after such a harsh year.
carbon_footprint on September 5, 2008 at 9:58 AM
I guess your talking about the code stink people interrupting.
Let me tell you something, in middle america we just gained votes because of that stunt.
Marxist can’t allow free speech and when they pull stunts like that on TV even people who are not poltical are repulsed and get it and identify that behavior with the Democrats
They are to stupid for there own good, how did all the demonstrating in 68 work out for them ? Richard Nixon landslide.
kangjie on September 5, 2008 at 10:01 AM
While Obama’s “change” is nebulous and scary (is it socialism? is it globalism?), McCain’s is transparency and fiscal conservatism. THAT is change I CAN believe in.
What the fans of Mr “Citizen of the World” do not grasp is that Americans do not want to have “the world” determine what they do with their money, their lives and their futures. I am always amazed that the Global Poverty Act he proposed gets no attention.
clnurnberg on September 5, 2008 at 10:05 AM
That and when he said “They broke me”
I will remember that for a long time.
Spirit of 1776 on September 5, 2008 at 10:06 AM
This is a shameful response to Palin’s speech from Doug Kmiec and the Matthew 25 Network — Obama supporters all. Please note that member Brian McLaren is a leader in the liberal emergent church movement that holds social works as more important and culturally relevant than the Bible itself.
Matthew 25:40 is the verse in which Jesus states, “as you did it to the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.” Kmiec, an avowed pro-lifer, has lost his credibility in support of the partial birth abortion candidate.
Terrie on September 5, 2008 at 10:06 AM
Amen to that. I didn’t like McCain before last night. But that speech was pretty powerful, and I’m confident that Palin will make him see it through.
Yes, I still put more money on Palin than I do McCain. But they do make a very solid Conservative team.
leetpriest on September 5, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Let’s look at it fairly, J. Compare McCain’s earmarks to Barrack’s. John’s take is, uh, Zero. Barrack? How many millions? Now compare Sarah Palin’s to Joe Biden. And Joe Biden’s son and brother, who are under investigation for some slippery practices. Gotta count the carry on baggage when summing the total bill. Want to go for listing REAL accomplishments, keeping in mind that coattail riding isn’t an accomplishment?
Patrick S on September 5, 2008 at 10:11 AM
Not only was John McCain’s speech right on target, but having listened to Cindy McCain’s speech on the radio, it’s obvious that her life experiences have made HER more qualified to be president than the community organizer at the top of the democratic ticket.
AndAwayWeGo on September 5, 2008 at 10:12 AM
What a speech!!!!!!!!!
Thanks to his selection of Sarah Palin this has gone from a ‘hold your nose’ election to an ‘only hold one nostril’ election.
Helloyawl on September 5, 2008 at 10:12 AM
That IS you, Small Mind. Think Greek Pillars.
Patrick S on September 5, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Gosh Patrick, I think you’ve nailed me.
I liked the pillars too…
See yah all later, gotta go to work.
J_Gocht on September 5, 2008 at 10:23 AM
Somebody should remind Kmiec of Obama’s brother living on a dollar a month in Africa, while Obama made millions writing “Dreams from my Father” about Africa and can’t spare him a dime.
Somehow, Bridget McCain shown at the convention last night doesn’t resemble John or Cindy McCain, but she is their daughter. Who is the REAL charitable candidate in this race?
Oh, and Sarah Palin who said on national television that parents of special-needs children will have an advocate in the White House if she’s elected? Been there, done that!
Saint James had it right. “Faith without works is dead.” This needs to be hammered home throughout this campaign.
Steve Z on September 5, 2008 at 10:25 AM
This was not the John McCain I thought I knew. I have discovered a new found respect for and understanding of John McCain.
http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/09/05/john-mccain-the-man-i-thought-i-knew/
Virginia Shanahan on September 5, 2008 at 10:35 AM
Having lived outside the US for 25 years I got a belly full of “hate America first.” The media everywhere are for moral equivalence, no standard of proper conduct and no mention of God except to cast aspersions on anyone dumb enough to follow him. People’s brains are soaked in this poison. The great compliment they tried to give me was ‘you don’t look American…you look more…European’ whatever that means.
Watching the GOP convention felt like a transfusion. Those are the real folks who live in the small towns across the nation – decent, hardworking and generous – coming together to cheer, to listen, to pray and to make up their own minds.
John McCain touched my heart. Maybe other people have seen too much of him, but I saw a lovable little fuzzball, tough as nails and sweet as pie at the same time. He made sense and exuded determination.
But at the end, when he exhorted everyone “Stand up, stand up, stand up and fight. Nothing is inevitable here. We’re Americans, and we never give up. We never quit. We never hide from history. We make history” – my face was wet with tears. He has got my vote.
rishika on September 5, 2008 at 10:45 AM
It IS just you…sadly enough.
ManlyRash on September 5, 2008 at 11:03 AM
Save the keystrokes, Jetboy. JG is a certified troll, which means he/she/it is to be abused and ridiculed whenever possible.
ManlyRash on September 5, 2008 at 9:06 AM
************************************************************
I’m new to this whole blog thing but now I get it, I think. My daughter, a student at Temple University in Philadelphia, gives me updates on the daily talking points (text messages) her peers are getting from the Obama campaign. Of course, they don’t talk to her, because she can think for herself and supports McCain, but they are very vocal about “the plan” for the day. They actually assign different people to be, I guess you would call it, “trolls”. It seems to me they would have to find people who have A LOT of free time and little original thinking…oh yeah, typical, entitled students who don’t have any grasp of economics (not my daughter, of course).
Moxie on September 5, 2008 at 11:03 AM
He hit a lot of strong points, I thought. Audio is up here.
chiefeditor on September 5, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Leave the damning of America to the doom and gloom crowd. This speech was the most public call to service since JFK and “Ask not”.
Also, it pulled at the heartstrings of patriotism like no spoken words since Ronald Reagan. It truly revealed Mav’s sincere love of country at a time when many express this affection; when in their heart of hearts they truly hate it and decry it’s underpinnings as flawed!
As you said, last night Mav revealed himself to be a true patriot, as well as Presidential…
Instead of the narcissistic Poseur that is at the essence of Mr. Obama’s being!
RocketmanBob on September 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM
The phrase we like to use is: Save a Keystroke…Stomp a Troll.
ManlyRash on September 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM
Here’s the vital portion that you’re missing:
John McCain has not been vague up to this point.
If you don’t already know the specifics … Then you’re not paying attention. I don’t think Ed or Allah are expecting every single speech, ever, to have specific policies laid out. But good god, the only specific policies Obama has laid out in the past (hardline troop withdrawl) he has flip flopped on.
So, try to compare apples to apples, yeah?
apollyonbob on September 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM
One thing I found notable for its absence was the list of huge new spending program that EVERY President in recent history has included in his innaugural address. For Republicans its hundreds of billions of dollars, for Democrats its trillians.
But McCain didn’t give one at all – or am I missing something.
I do remember him saying something about cutting 700 billion in foreign aid. That’s something I’d like to hear a LOT more detail about – but McCain used it as a throwaway line.
logis on September 5, 2008 at 12:37 PM
Agreed. I was hoping that the RNC as a whole would have pushed the Lexington Project, a plan that the Dems/ media are patently ignoring… since it actually makes sense. Drill here, drill now, pay less is a nice slogan, but it works into the Dem counter argument. I would LOVE to have seen McCain (or Palin!?!) do a Gore-esque Powerpoint presentation, defining the Lexington Project and a comprehensive plan for the future.
McCain started to go there with the opening line of his energy segment, but it didn’t go far enough. If he could work his plans individually in with the energy of the end of his speech and visuals, he would win in a landslide.
The media/ Dems are making a concerted effort to push that he has no plan. The argument needs to be shot like a moose within 250 yards of Sarah Palin.
Damiano on September 5, 2008 at 1:25 PM
If McCain wins this election and is sucessful as President the end of that speech could go down in history as one of the great calls for support we’ve seen.
The rest of the speech was pretty un-necessary.
eski502 on September 5, 2008 at 1:41 PM
Wow, Jim, that was, uh, quite a statement. I don’t know what your politics are, but I find liberal men usually like the disheveled women with hairy armpits. I guess Sarah and Cindy are just too purty for ya, huh? What a ridiculous statement.
Glynn on September 5, 2008 at 1:48 PM
Very well said.
Glynn on September 5, 2008 at 1:50 PM
No, Glynn.
Todd Palin has essentially become a stay-at-home dad. And McCain depends on his wife’s money.
Isn’t this the revenge of the feminists?
jim m on September 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM
I’m 100% with you on your concerns… but the reality is we need to chose which party will be in office the next 4 years that will be a firm foundation we can work from to resolve these and other matters of import; chiefly national security and the economy.
Hopefully, those conservatives that are going to “sit this one out” are becoming fewer and fewer. As I see it in this race, if you sit home and don’t vote for McCain you’ve just cast a vote for Obama.
Note: I am not in any way suggesting that you, tre, are sitting this one out – I’m speaking to those that are still upset that their favorite conservative isn’t on the ticket, and has decided to do nothing in November as their response.
Ya want one of my (many) Fred08 bumper stickers?
electric-rascal on September 5, 2008 at 3:03 PM
No, Jim. It’s the culmination of early, first-wave feminism, a.k.a. “equity feminism”, and the utter refutation of female-supremacist “gender feminism.”
Remember that the early feminists sought equality with men in certain specific areas: the rights to own property, take jobs outside the home, and vote. Far from bashing men to get those rights, the “suffragettes” argued their case with examples of strong female leaders in history (such as Elizabeth I, Joan of Arc, Catherine the Great, or Empress Jingū of Japan) and Biblical heroines (Deborah, Jael, Judith, Miriam). They didn’t commit acts of terrorism to gain their point: They chained themselves to buildings, or went on hunger strikes. And they never would have succeeded, if they had not been able to persuade men (who had the vote) that their arguments were just and fair.
Likewise, the feminists of the post-WWII period, who had just been in the workforce in unprecedented numbers during the War, sought equal access to jobs in all career fields and equal sharing of responsibility in the home between husband and wife. In the main, they were not anti-marriage per se (gender feminism came later), but attempting to change the expectations of marriage as they existed before.
This is the feminism to which Gov. Palin and Mrs. McCain belong. Mrs. McCain owns her own property which is not in any way under her husband’s control. Gov. Palin and her husband share responsibility for their children. Revenge? No — this is fulfillment. And it’s beautiful.
Mary in LA on September 5, 2008 at 3:12 PM
Rats! I had a great response to jim m’s comment, and Wordpress ate it. :-(
Mary in LA on September 5, 2008 at 3:39 PM
Ed:
That is a good post. McCain did look Presidential out there.
Terrye on September 5, 2008 at 4:13 PM
Here’s my take. For anyone who cares.
http://myriadscreed.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/mccains-performance-and-the-medias-silliness/
MyriadScreed on September 5, 2008 at 4:52 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2